Home

Columnists

Merchandise

Other Stuff

 

 Air America Radio

 Head-On Radio Network

 Search dubyaD40.com

Google


Search Web
Search dubyaD40.com

 Ads by The Google

 Take Action

 Advertisers

 Want to link to us?


It's easy to do.  Right click on the image below and choose "Copy."  Then paste it on your site.


 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 Inside Ed's Head

   


E-mail Ed!

Bigger Balls, Bush or Jane Fonda?
By Ed
Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Ed here,

Jane has nuts the size of quart-jars. Bush has one the size of a hay-seed, and the other one is just a little bitty sucker. The proof is in his actions. Bush wasn't man enough to serve his country, and Jane was against an unjust military action.

First Jane

Jane did what she did because she felt strongly about what was happening in Viet Nam. Granted, she probably could have done it in a different way. The fact is that 58,000 Americans died for what? Jane Fonda was against losing these fine Americans for politics. You also have to remember that Jane was young when she did that. Sometimes young people do things they aren't so proud of when they get older, even if they had good intentions when they did it. If anyone reading this can tell me that you never did anything out of anger for an unjust cause, I'll kiss your ass. Just remember she was a young girl that took it upon herself to make a statement. At least she made a statement.

Now Bush

When W was a young man, he didn't have balls enough to make a statement. In fact, W made it a point to use daddy's influence to beat the system. W hid behind his old-man's political influence to evade the time he should have spent in Viet Nam. For that, G.H.W. Bush, you are just as big of a scum-bag as your son. How this country allowed W to be the president of this great land is beyond me. Let alone that fact that he was re-elected.

Now that he is 60, W has decided to go to Viet Nam to shore up relations for free trade. Where's the free trade you piece of shit? Viet Nam is in a state that they can't afford to buy our goods. The USA is in a state that we can't afford not to buy theirs. What do we have that a country like Viet Nam can afford to buy? Free trade under W is free money for big business in America. Wal-Mart is all for it. Maybe they can profit from free trade like this, but real Americans can't. But since when has W been for real Americans?

I can hear the Vietnamese President telling Bush; "Misser Bush, you very good man. You big pussy, but you very good man. You no come to Viet Nam and kill my people because you big pussy. We have free trade so you and Wal-Mart makes lots of money, me too". And then W says, "That's the plan".

The Democrats have 2 years to put this sorry piece of shit in his place. I hope they are smart enough to do it. We need to bring fairness to free trade. We need to put a stop to out-sourcing. We need to stop the tax breaks for millionaires. We need to have health care. We can't let them use gays and guns against us. We need to put a stop to Religion controlling this country. We can't allow Bush and his party to shit on the Constitution. If we can do these things, we can't lose in 08.

Remember, opinions are like ass-holes. I just showed you mine.
Ed

Permalink

 

 

 
 Recent Posts

 
 Archives

 
 Amazon.com


 
 
 
 
 
 

dubyaD40.com

Site Meter