Home

Columnists

Merchandise

Other Stuff

 

 Air America Radio

 Head-On Radio Network

 Search dubyaD40.com

Google


Search Web
Search dubyaD40.com

 Ads by The Google

 Take Action

 Recent Posts

 Archives

 Today's Reason To Drink



 Want to link to us?


It's easy to do.  Right click on the image below and choose "Copy."  Then paste it on your site.


 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 Today's Topics

 
Thursday, January 31, 2008
The 2008 Presidential Candidates...
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:43 PM

What will they look like in four years?

We've all seen how the Presidency can age someone. Here is a fast forward look as to what the Presidential Candidates might look like four years into the future.

Mitt Romney:


John Edwards:


Rudy Giuliani:


John McCain:


Barack Obama:


Mike Huckabee:


Ron Paul:


Hillary Clinton:


Credit: HolyJuan

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Montel Got Kicked Off FauxNews for Talking Troops
posted by Wally
1:07 PM

And those sonsabitches brag about how they support the troops? Way to go Montel - talk about what's really important. Show these liars and propagandists for what they are.
Montel Williams turned the question on live television when he choose to focus on the solders dying in Iraq rather than the passing of Heath Ledger. Montel did not return for a further segment.


Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

After 7 years of Bush, should we feel safer yet?
posted by Wally
12:46 PM

US military not adequately prepared for homeland attack, report says

The U.S. military isn't ready for a catastrophic attack on the country, and National Guard forces don't have the equipment or training they need for the job, according to a report.

Even fewer Army National Guard units are combat-ready today than were nearly a year ago when the Commission on the National Guard and Reserves determined that 88 percent of the units were not prepared for the fight, the panel says in a new report released Thursday.

The commission's 400-page report concludes that the nation "does not have sufficient trained, ready forces available" to respond to a chemical, biological or nuclear weapons incident, "an appalling gap that places the nation and its citizens at greater risk."

"Right now we don't have the forces we need, we don't have them trained, we don't have the equipment," commission Chairman Arnold Punaro said in an interview with The Associated Press. "Even though there is a lot going on in this area, we need to do a lot more.... There's a lot of things in the pipeline, but in the world we live in - you're either ready or you're not."
Maybe this is why we don't hear Gee Dubya saying "Bring 'em on" much lately.

Mission Accomplished

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Hillary's past comes a knockin'
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:38 AM

Clinton Remained Silent As Wal-Mart Fought Unions

In six years as a member of the Wal-Mart board of directors, between 1986 and 1992, Hillary Clinton remained silent as the world's largest retailer waged a major campaign against labor unions seeking to represent store workers.

Clinton has been endorsed for president by more than a dozen unions, according to her campaign Web site, which omits any reference to her role at Wal-Mart in its detailed biography of her.

Wal-Mart's anti-union efforts were headed by one of Clinton's fellow board members, John Tate, a Wal-Mart executive vice president who also served on the board with Clinton for four of her six years.

Tate was fond of repeating, as he did at a managers meeting in 2004 after his retirement, what he said was his favorite phrase, "Labor unions are nothing but blood-sucking parasites living off the productive labor of people who work for a living."

......

The tapes show Clinton in the role of a loyal company woman. "I'm always proud of Wal-Mart and what we do and the way we do it better than anybody else," she said at a June 1990 stockholders meeting.


Video & story here

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Now THIS is how you support the troops
posted by Wally
7:59 AM

A couple of South Carolina Democrats are talking about a simple, inexpensive, common sense way to show that they support our troops. Buy them a beer. Or at least allow them to buy their own.
COLUMBIA, S.C. - A state lawmaker wants to give members of the armed forces younger than 21 the right to buy alcohol even though it's in stark contrast to the military's efforts to diminish underage drinking and related accidents.

"I really don't think it should create a problem for the military. It might even enhance their morale," Rep. Fletcher Smith said Wednesday.

"It's absurd that people serving in the military are trained to kill on the battlefield but at the same time couldn't come back home and have a beer," the Greenville Democrat said. "If you're old enough to get training in the U.S. military, you should be old enough to get a beer. That training really matures a person."

"If a man is old enough to defend his country and die for his country," he shouldn't be told he's too young for a beer, said Rep. Grady Brown, D-Bishopville.
This is an idea we at dubyaD40 can really get behind, and have been advocating for years. These men and women out their risking their asses to defend us. Whether you (or they) agree with the conflict that the government sent them to fight or not, they go out and are willing to take a bullet to do thier duty and serve their country. What right do we have to tell them they're not "adult" enough to have a beer?

Cheers!

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

But Dubya said the Surge is Working?
posted by Wally
7:26 AM

Did he use these two reports as evidence?

Suicides Among Active-Duty Soldiers Reach Record High

Suicides among active-duty soldiers in 2007 reached their highest level since the Army began keeping such records in 1980, according to a draft internal study obtained by The Washington Post. Last year, 121 soldiers took their own lives, nearly 20 percent more than in 2006.

At the same time, the number of attempted suicides or self-inflicted injuries in the Army has jumped sixfold since the Iraq war began. Last year, about 2,100 soldiers injured themselves or attempted suicide, compared with about 350 in 2002, according to the U.S. Army Medical Command Suicide Prevention Action Plan.

The conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have placed severe stress on the Army, caused in part by repeated and lengthened deployments. Historically, suicide rates tend to decrease when soldiers are in conflicts overseas, but that trend has reversed in recent years. From a suicide rate of 9.8 per 100,000 active-duty soldiers in 2001 -- the lowest rate on record -- the Army reached an all-time high of 17.5 suicides per 100,000 active-duty soldiers in 2006.

Remember how the Republicans were squealing about how the military was broken and morale at an all time low back in 2001 after 8 years of Democratic Presidency? Looks like Bush and the Republicans did a "heck of a job" fixing that problem. That a great plan Dubya had - raising morale by giving those bored soldiers something to do - starting a couple of wars and sending them overseas to keep them busy and out of trouble.

It's working as well as anything else he and the Republicans have done in the past 7 years. What's that term again? Oh yeah - Miserable Failure.

Another sign of the the startling progress that's been made in Iraq comes from this report.
Million Iraqis dead since invasion

A new study estimates that more than 1 million Iraqis have died because of the war in Iraq since the US-led invasion of the country in 2003.

Data compiled by London-based Opinion Research Business (ORB) and its research partner in Iraq, the Independent Institute for Administration and Civil Society Studies (IIACSS) reveals a fifth of Iraqi households lost at least one family member between March 2003 and August 2007 due to the conflict.

"We now estimate that the death toll between March 2003 and August 2007 is likely to have been in the order of 1,033,000," ORB said in a statement.

The margin of error for the survey was 1.7 per cent, making the estimated range between 946,000 and 1.12 million fatalities.
Mission Accomplished!

Everything Bush touches turns to death and destruction. Can we end this occupation and bring our troops home now? Haven't we done enough damage yet?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, January 30, 2008
Willard loses by a whisker
posted by Wally
9:42 AM

Yesterday in the Florida GOP primary, John McCain edged out Willard "Mitt" Romney to become the solid front-runner in the Republican primary race.


John "StayPuft" McCain - 36%


Willard "Mitt" Romney - 31%


When asked to comment, Romney simply said "Rats!"

Meanwhile, Rudy 9ui11iani's campaign - in honor of the terrorist attack he can't stop talking about - collapsed and crumbled like a pair of plane-stricken burning skyscrapers.

With Rudy gone, the GOP race comes down to a battle between.....

Rats -vs- Sweets

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Giuliani drops out to spend more time with 9/11,
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
9:20 AM

Giuliani to Drop Out, Endorse McCain

ABC News' Jake Tapper and Rick Klein Report: Rudy Giuliani will board a plane to California on Wednesday morning, as planned. But, sources tell ABC News, once there, instead of participating in the GOP debate, he will drop out of the presidential race and endorse Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

Giuliani came down to greet supporters at the Loews Portofino Bay Hotel in Orlando. Responding to a friendly cheer from the audience, Giuliani laughed and quoted "that famous philosopher Yogi Berra, 'It's not over until it's over.'"

But it appeared over.

"Like most Americans, I love competition. I don't back down. . . but there must always be a purpose," Giuliani told supporters as his poor third-place showing became clear on the widescreen TVs. "Elections are about a lot more than candidates."

9/11

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Damn.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:41 AM

Thanks for getting your message out John. It's too bad you couldn't have stayed in longer.

Edwards is dropping out

"Democrat John Edwards is exiting the presidential race Wednesday, ending a scrappy underdog bid in which he steered his rivals toward progressive ideals while grappling with family hardship that roused voter's sympathies but never diverted his campaign," the Associated Press reports.

The wire service says "the two-time White House candidate notified a close circle of senior advisers that he planned to make the announcement at a 1 p.m. ET event in New Orleans that had been billed as a speech on poverty, according to two of his advisers. The decision came after Edwards lost the four states to hold nominating contests so far to rivals who stole the spotlight from the beginning -- Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama."

Update at 9:18 a.m. ET: A source within the Edwards campaign with direct knowledge of the candidate's plans has confirmed for us that the AP report is correct.

Update at 9:30 a.m. ET: ABC News' Political Radar blog writes that "news of a decision to drop out of the race ends speculation that Edwards was aiming to be a kingmaker at the convention by collecting a significant amount of delegates to be able to have a say in who would become his party's nominee. ... Edwards has not publicly said who he will throw his support behind, though he has had private conversations with both Clinton and Obama in recent days."

Edwards has at least 26 delegates for the Democratic National Convention. It takes 2,025 to get the party's nomination.

Update at 9:40 a.m. ET: No endorsement expected:

The AP adds that, "the former North Carolina senator will not immediately endorse either candidate in what is now a two-person race for the Democratic nomination, said one adviser, who spoke on condition of anonymity in advance of the announcement." USA TODAY's Kathy Kiely reports she also has been told that by a campaign aide with knowledge of what Edwards will do.

GObama?

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Lawmakers near immunity fight, extend spy bill
posted by Wally
7:45 AM

Amid a high-stakes battle over whether to grant telephone companies immunity, the U.S. House of Representatives agreed on Tuesday to extend for 15 days an expiring anti-terror surveillance law.

Bush and Republicans have pushed for passage of a bill that would replace a surveillance law, set to expire on Friday, that expanded the power of U.S. authorities last August to track suspected enemy targets without a court order.

The new measure would tighten controls on these expanded powers. It would also grant retroactive immunity from lawsuits to any telecommunication company that participated in Bush's warrantless domestic spying program, begun shortly after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

With the Senate tied up in knots over the legislation, Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, said, "The main issue is whether we have retroactive immunity to phone companies. That's what it all boils down to."
Reuters

Our good friend Nancy put the immunity issue into perfect perspective. To paraphrase what she said, "Bush and the Republicans are pushing for retroactive immunity for the telecomm companies, saying they should be immune from lawsuits and prosecution because they were just doing what the government told them to do. Meantime, soldiers like Lynndie England are rotting in prison for doing the exact same thing - doing what the government told them."

The big difference is, in Lynndie's case, since she was in the military, if she had refused to carry out her orders, she would have gotten into trouble anyway for insubordination. Damned if she did, damned if she didn't. The telecomm companies have no such dilemma.

It's simple. If they broke the law, they should face the consequences - and don't even try to tell me that they aren't fully aware of the nuances and subtleties of the law. Dookie and I both work for the phone company, as does my wife. When it comes to things like this, they don't blow their noses without consulting with a team of lawyers. They walked into this full well knowing they were violating the Constitution and breaking the law, and they did it anyway.

If Cheney walked up to you and told you to shoot an old man in the face, and you did it, it's a safe bet you wouldn't get away with it. In this case, Cheney and Bush are telling the phone companies to shoot us all in the face, and some of them have been listening to them.


Call and/or write your Congress-critters and tell them NO Immunity for Phone Companies!

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:32 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya at a "slave house" on Goree Island in Senegal in 2003.


Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Supporting the Troops: Army tried to stop VA from helping disabled Ft. Drum soldiers file for benefits
posted by Wally
1:59 PM

Army officials in upstate New York instructed representatives from the Department of Veterans Affairs not to help disabled soldiers at Fort Drum Army base with their military disability paperwork last year. That paperwork can be crucial because it helps determine whether soldiers will get annual disability payments and health care after they're discharged.

Now soldiers at Fort Drum say they feel betrayed by the institutions that are supposed to support them. The soldiers want to know why the Army would want to stop them from getting help with their disability paperwork and why the VA - whose mission is to help veterans - would agree to the Army's request.

One disabled soldier, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he fears retaliation from the military, says it feels like a slap in the face.

"To be tossed aside like a worn-out pair of boots is pretty disheartening," the soldier says. "I always believed the Army would take care of me if I did the best I could, and I've done that."

"Worn-out boots"

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

We went to war twice for WHAT?!
posted by Wally
8:11 AM

Iraq invaded Kuwait, and drew us into the first Gulf War, because of an insult.
Also, Saddam thought that Bin Laden was a threat to him and his regime.
And the WMD's were destroyed in the '90's.


The man who knew Saddam better than any other American is FBI agent George Piro. Over the course of months spent with Saddan while he was in prison, Piro interrogated him, got to know him, and in a strange way befriended him in order to gain his trust and get him to open up. In so doing, he was able to find out the answers about some troubling questions about such things as WMD's, connections with Al Qaeda, etc.

He talked with "60 Minutes" about what he learned. Much of what he had to say is disturbing, to say the least. To me, it's infuriating - not at Saddam - he's just a run of the mill megaolomaniacal sadistic evil dictator. That's what you expect from someone like that. What infuriates me is how the Bush administration reacted, and what they've done to our nation in the process.

Below are some key points. You can read the full story at the link above, or watch the video by clicking on the image below.



What caused the first Gulf War? What caused Saddam to invade Kuwait? What was the reason for spending 7 Billions dollars and mobilizing 500,000 troops and marching across Kuwait to push Saddam back behind his own borders? What started the war that cost the region $676 Billion in 1990-91? It was all triggered by a personal insult.

From the 60 Minutes interview:
"What really triggered it for him, according to Saddam, was he had sent his foreign minister to Kuwait to meet with the Emir Al Sabah, the former leader of Kuwait, to try to resolve some of these issues. And the Emir told the foreign minister of Iraq that he would not stop doing what he was doing until he turned every Iraqi woman into a $10 prostitute. And that really sealed it for him, to invade Kuwait. He wanted to punish, he told me, Emir Al Sabah, for saying that," Piro explains.
He could have responded with a "so's your mother" joke, but no, he had to start a fucking war. What an asshole.

What about those WMD's that Dubya, and Unca Dick, and Colin Powell kept trying to scare the shit out of us with in order to drag us into the second Gulf War?
"He told me that most of the WMD had been destroyed by the U.N. inspectors in the '90s. And those that hadn't been destroyed by the inspectors were unilaterally destroyed by Iraq," Piro says.
Okay, so the WMD's were, as anyone paying attention suspected, as the inspectors tried to tell us, a non-issue, trumped up as an excuse to invade. But there were the ties to bin Laden, right? Right?
"He considered him to be a fanatic. And as such was very wary of him. He told me, 'You can't really trust fanatics,'" Piro says.

Piro says Saddam thought that Bin Laden was a threat to him and his regime.
So... tell me again... why did we just blow 4 years, 4,000 American lives, half a Trillion dollars, 100's of 1,000's of Iraqi civilian's lives, and the reputation of America? What the fuck are we doing over there?

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

W's SotU speech full of new exciting ideas, like "War and Taxes" - oh, and hints of "let's invade Iran"
posted by Wally
7:27 AM

Who would have thought, after 7 years of his Presidency, that Dubya could keep coming up with fresh and inspiring ideas like he proposed last night? Who could have predicted that he would have focused on such innovative proposals for his last year in office - something you never hear from the Republicans - as "war on terror" and "lower taxes".

Well, okay. Everyone. He delivered just what everyone has come to expect from him. Not much.
Bush, Facing Woes in '08, Focuses on War and Taxes

Facing an unstable economy and an unfinished war, President Bush used his final State of the Union address Monday night to call for quick passage of his tax rebate package, patience in Iraq and a modest concluding agenda that includes $300 million in scholarship money for low-income children in struggling schools.

Mr. Bush devoted relatively little of his 53 minute speech to the economy, the issue that is the top concern of voters during this election year. He spent far more time talking about the issue that has been his own primary concern, Iraq.
Most, if not all of what he said was the same old hashed over crap we've heard from him every year. An hour long nation-wide "yawn".

But not all of it. At one point he said something that made Mrs. Wally and I both sit up with a big WTF moment. It was another rehash of old crap, but it was pretty ominous rehash.
Our message to the people of Iran is clear. We have no quarrel with you. We have respect your traditions and your history. We look forward to the day when you have your freedom.

Our message to the leaders of Iran is also clear. Verifiably suspend your nuclear enrichment so negotiations can begin. And to rejoin the community of nations, come clean about your nuclear intentions and past actions. Stop your oppression at home. Cease your support for terror abroad.
To me, this sounds eerily similar to this little ditty from the State of the Union 5 years ago:
And tonight I have a message for the brave and oppressed people of Iraq: Your enemy is not surrounding your country, your enemy is ruling your country.
One other thing that struck me from his speech last night.
In Afghanistan, America, our 25 NATO allies and 15 partner nations are helping the Afghan people defend their freedom and rebuild their country.

Thanks to the courage of these military and civilian personnel, a nation that was once a safe haven for al Qaeda is now a young democracy where boys and girls are going to school. New roads and hospitals are being built. And people are looking to the future with new hope.

These successes must continue. So we're adding 3,200 Marines to our forces in Afghanistan, where they will fight the terrorists and train the Afghan army and police.
If things are going so great in Afghanistan, why the hell are we sending MORE troops there? If such great progress has been made (it hasn't), and if there is so much hope for the future (there isn't), then our job should be done there, right?

If the Warmonger in Chief hadn't pulled our troops out of Afghanistan and sent them into Iraq, he probably would have been able to stand there honestly and proudly and rightfully brag about what a great job he did rebuilding Afghanistan and freeing the Afghan people. But he didn't. So he can't. Once again, he's lying.

Nothing new to see hear. Same old thing.

Transcript at CNN

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, January 28, 2008
$19 Billion in Congressional earmarks: Bad. $70 Billion in Iraq earmarks: Critical
posted by Wally
11:05 AM

No wonder dubya is threatening vetoes and issuing executive orders to cut (or ignore) the $19 billion in earmarks in this year's budget. He needs that money - plus another 51 Billion on top of it - to play with his toy soldiers in Irag.
Bush to ask for $70 billion in partial 2009 war funding

The Bush administration will ask Congress next week for $70 billion to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and other related operations for part of the 2009 fiscal year, the Pentagon said on Monday.

The funding would be in addition to the administration's request for the regular Pentagon budget which is to be presented next week.

Since the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, Congress has approved $691 billion to pay for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and such related activities as Iraq reconstruction, the Congressional Budget Office said last week.

Of the total, the CBO estimated that $440 billion had been spent on the war in Iraq.
That $70,000,000,000.00 (look at all those zeroes) comes to another $233.33 for every man, woman, and child in America. For "partially" funding one year of his catastrophic invasion and occupation. We'd be better off taking $233 one dollar bills and lighting them on fire. At least that way they'll help keep us warm, which could come in handy since "In 2007, according to the Labor Department, gasoline and home heating prices rose 29.4 percent."

Remember, every dollar spent blowing things up and killing people in Iraq means another dollar that can't be spent on things like improving education, providing healthcare to poor kids, securing the future of Social Security. Another 70 Billion dollars that won't be spent taking care of the REAL threats to America, like fixing the crumbling roads and dangerous bridges, taking steps to prevent disasters like Katrina and cleaning up after they occur, protecting the environment, protecting the Civil Liberties guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, etc, etc, etc.

What will the Democratic leadership in congress say about it? If history is any indication, they'll talk tough and threaten to impose non-binding timelines and benchmarks - and then they'll give Chimpy McWarhardon yet another blank check, just like they always do.

Your tax dollars at work

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

For those keeping score at home
posted by Wally
9:19 AM

In Saturday's South Carolina primary, Obama beat the top two Republican candidates. Combined.

In last week's Republican primary, McCain got 147,283 votes and Huckabee got 132,440, for a total of 279,723 votes. In Saturday's Democratic primary, Obama got 295,091. You could have thrown 9iu11iani and Hunter into the tally for good measure, and Obama alone still would have beat their total.


Let's have some more fun with fuzzy math, just for kicks. Adding up the total votes we get:
GOP: 442,918 - or 45% of the total vote
Dems: 530,322 - or 55% of the total vote

What's that 10% difference called again? Oh yeah.

Landslide.

Or at least serious ass-kicking. You might expect these kinds of numbers in California, but this was South Carolina.

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

After 7 years, he finally decides pork is bad?
posted by Wally
8:30 AM

For the first 6 years of his presidency, Dubya couldn't seem to find his veto pen. Nor could he find the "fiscal conservatism" that he kept talking about. While the Republicans in Congress were dropping a billion here and a billion there into the budget at the last minute, or in the middle of the night, behind closed doors, he never seemed to see a problem with "earmarks". Just ask Ted Stevens (R-AK) about his "bridge to nowhere" for a perfect example of wasteful pork that Dubya thought was just a dandy idea.

Suddenly, with the Dems in charge, he's turned 180 degrees. When the GOP was in charge of Congress, he unquestioningly signed anything and everything they put in front of him. Now that the Dems are in charge, the opposite is the case - no matter how much they compromise, there is practically nothing they can do that he doesn't just reject outright, simply because they are Democrats and he is a Republican.

Now, in an extension of this childish game, he is trying to essentially revive the "line-item veto" - which was struck down by the Supreme Court - by issuing an "executive order".
President George W. Bush will begin "unprecedented steps" to trim billions of dollars earmarked by lawmakers for pet projects, a White House spokesman said.

Bush will issue an executive order tomorrow directing federal agencies to ignore any earmarks included only in committee reports, not in the text of legislation.
These steps are unprecedented because they are unconstitutional. Budgeting and funding the government is the responsibility of the Congress, not the President. By issuing this executive order, Bush is overstepping the bounds set by the Constitution that he took an oath to "defend and uphold". He is trying to sidestep the Constitution, again, by turning a signing statement into a line item veto.

Granted, we at DubyaD40 are not against cutting wasteful pork. In fact, we think it's a great idea. We're just pointing out the blatant abuse of power that Dubya is attempting, as well as the standard issue hypocricy to which we've become so accustomed.
Congress approved more than 11,700 earmarks valued at a total of more than $19 billion for the fiscal 2008 spending year, according to the Office of Management and Budget.
That's a lot of pork, but we wonder why Dubya didn't take issue with the 2005 budget, which, according to the Office of Management and Budget, contained "13,492 earmarks totaling $18,938,657,000". I wonder what that's worth in 2008 dollars, after inflation.

Oh, and by the way, in the 2008 budget that's making George throw a hissy fit, "About 40 percent of the money was for items requested by Republicans."

So much for fiscal conservatism.

EDIT: I've posted these before, but I couldn't resist doing it again to help illustrate the hypocricy of what Bush is saying.



Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Just in time for the State of the Union tonight. The SOTU Drinking Game 2008
posted by Wally
7:54 AM



"He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient." -- U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section III

"Madame Speaker, the President of the United States..."

The general rules of this game are no different from any other drinking game. A drink is either a shot or a good gulp from a beer (or cider). Different events call for different numbers of drinks and all you do is watch the speech and play along. If all goes well, you'll be unconscious by the time they show the other party's response.
GAME TIME
This year, President Bush's State of the Union address is scheduled for Monday, January 28, 2008 at 9pm (Eastern). It should be broadcast on all major networks and cable news/political networks. For online coverage, go to http://www.c-span.org/executive/stateoftheunion.asp.

Get this year's game card at http://www.drinkinggame.us/?2008

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:35 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption


Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, January 27, 2008
The death of the neo-con agenda
posted by Clyde
6:36 AM

Democrats come out in South Carolina

The South Carolina Democratic Party broke its own turnout record in Saturday's presidential primary and eclipsed the number of ballots cast by residents in the Republican primary the week before.

With 99 percent of precincts reporting, more than 532,000 votes had been tabulated in Barack Obama's commanding victory here. The returns easily eclipsed the 280,000 people who voted in the Democratic primary in 2004.

Democratic officials characterized the record-breaking vote as a sign that the party is resurgent in South Carolina.

"Even in this reddest of all states, Democrats can win," state party Chairwoman Carol Fowler said. "I hope it indicates Democrats are getting a new lease on life."

(YeeHaa!)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

One-sided Support
posted by Clyde
6:12 AM

Pakistan Rebuffs Secret U.S. Plea for C.I.A. Buildup

The top two American intelligence officials traveled secretly to Pakistan early this month to press President Pervez Musharraf to allow the Central Intelligence Agency greater latitude to operate in the tribal territories where Al Qaeda, the Taliban and other militant groups are all active, according to several officials who have been briefed on the visit.

But in the unannounced meetings on Jan. 9 with the two American officials - Mike McConnell, the director of national intelligence, and Gen. Michael V. Hayden, the C.I.A. director - Mr. Musharraf rebuffed proposals to expand any American combat presence in Pakistan, either through unilateral covert C.I.A. missions or by joint operations with Pakistani security forces.

Instead, Pakistan and the United States are discussing a series of other joint efforts, including increasing the number and scope of missions by armed Predator surveillance aircraft over the tribal areas, and identifying ways that the United States can speed information about people suspected of being militants to Pakistani security forces, officials said.

American and Pakistani officials have questioned each other in recent months about the quality and time lines of information that the United States has given to Pakistan to use in focusing on those extremists. American officials have complained that the Pakistanis are not seriously pursuing Al Qaeda in the region.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Don't you have to do something worthwhile to be modest?
posted by Clyde
6:02 AM

Bush plans modest final State of the Union speech

Beginning his final year in office with low approval ratings, a Democratic Congress and a nation fixated on choosing his successor, President Bush is preparing a State of the Union speech for Monday that will accentuate unfinished business and lay out modest goals.

In his radio address Saturday, Bush said he would use his speech to urge congressional action to stimulate the economy and to authorize a warrantless wiretapping program that provides legal immunity for telephone companies that cooperated with administration surveillance efforts before laws were changed.

White House Press Secretary Dana Perino said Bush's speech would be "focused on the future" rather than providing a review of the president's seven years in office and would "reflect the president's mind set that he is going to sprint to the finish."

But the central policy measures Bush plans to highlight, according to senior aides, are issues that have already run into major objections: extending the eavesdropping legislation; perpetuating the 2001 and '03 tax cuts, and renewing the 2002 overhaul of education programs encompassed in the No Child Left Behind law, among others.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, January 26, 2008
Hurry up to Baghdad and wait for healthcare!
posted by Clyde
7:33 AM

TBI task force identifies shortfalls in care

An Army report on the cause, diagnosis and treatment of traumatic brain injuries among soldiers and Marines who have been in combat cited a number of gaps in services and care for those suffering TBI.

One in five soldiers and Marines returning from Iraq and Afghanistan may have suffered mild TBI, the task force estimated, and some may not be aware they need treatment.

"Many of the mild cases are overlooked," Brig. Gen. Donald Bradshaw, commander of the Southeast Regional Medical Command and chairman of the TBI Task Force, said Jan. 17 at a press conference to release the report.

The task force of 17 medical professionals, writers and researchers from the Army, Marine Corps and Air Force conducted a review of policies governing TBI patient care, including diagnosis, education, research and case management.

(About F'ing Time!)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wiretapping + NSA + Dubya = Nervous Yet?
posted by Clyde
7:18 AM

Bush Order Expands Network Monitoring

President Bush signed a directive this month that expands the intelligence community's role in monitoring Internet traffic to protect against a rising number of attacks on federal agencies' computer systems.

The directive, whose content is classified, authorizes the intelligence agencies, in particular the National Security Agency, to monitor the computer networks of all federal agencies -- including ones they have not previously monitored.
(What government agency isn't monitored - Sounds like a loophole to me)

Until now, the government's efforts to protect itself from cyber-attacks -- which run the gamut from hackers to organized crime to foreign governments trying to steal sensitive data -- have been piecemeal. Under the new initiative, a task force headed by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) will coordinate efforts to identify the source of cyber-attacks against government computer systems. As part of that effort, the Department of Homeland Security will work to protect the systems and the Pentagon will devise strategies for counterattacks against the intruders.

There has been a string of attacks on networks at the State, Commerce, Defense and Homeland Security departments in the past year and a half. U.S. officials and cyber-security experts have said Chinese Web sites were involved in several of the biggest attacks back to 2005, including some at the country's nuclear-energy labs and large defense contractors.

(1 inch = 1 mile)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, January 25, 2008
Top Ten Barack Obama Campaign Promises
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:17 AM

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
8:07 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya talking about his economic stimulus package with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.


Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

"Just forget what I said!"
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:46 AM

Because Iraq was more important:

President Bush Says Usama Bin Laden May Not Be Captured During His Time in Office

Capturing Usama bin Laden has been one of President Bush's top priorities during his time in office, but the president now seems to doubt the Al Qaeda mastermind will be found before his term ends next January.

Speaking about his goals for his last year in the White House, Bush tells FOX News in an exclusive interview to air this weekend that if U.S. military and intelligence knew where bin Laden was, they would have apprehended him already.

"If we could find the cave he is in, I promise you - he would be brought to justice or wherever he's hiding," he tells FOX News in "George W. Bush: Fighting to the Finish," a documentary scheduled to air Sunday, Jan. 27, at 8 p.m. ET.

...

"For the country, it's a matter of closure in many ways for those who suffered under the attacks," Bush said. "He's hiding. He's isolated. He's not out there leading any parades."

Dead or Alive?

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Give it up for Dodd!
posted by Clyde
6:48 AM

Filibuster Threatened Over Wiretap Law
Senate Debates Competing BIlls Overseeing Surveillance Of Americans

A Senate filibuster is promised against a bill that would grant immunity from lawsuits against telecommunication companies that participated in the Bush administration's warrantless wiretapping of U.S. citizens.

Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., reiterated his intent to block the Intelligence Committee's version of a renewed surveillance law known as FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) if it includes immunity.

The bill is S.2248. There is a competing FISA bill from the Judiciary Committee which does not grant immunity.

An amendment by Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., which would have stripped immunity from the Judiciary Committee version, was tabled this afternoon, by a vote of 60-34.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Now that's judicial activism!
posted by Clyde
6:27 AM

Judge wants answers on CIA videotapes

A federal judge said Thursday that CIA interrogation videotapes may have been relevant to his court case and he gave the Bush administration three weeks to explain why they were destroyed in 2005 and say whether other evidence was also destroyed.

Several judges are considering wading into the dispute over the videos, but U.S. District Judge Richard W. Roberts was the first to order the administration to provide a written report on the matter.

The tapes showed harsh interrogation tactics used by CIA officers questioning al-Qaida suspects Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri in 2002. The Justice Department and Congress are investigating the destruction of the tapes.

When they were destroyed, the government was under various court orders to retain evidence relevant to terrorism suspects at U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. After it became public in December that the tapes had been destroyed, lawyers for several detainees went to court demanding to know more.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

And then there were three.
posted by Wally
12:37 AM

Kucinich to Drop Bid and Focus on Re-election

Representative Dennis J. Kucinich has decided to end his long-shot presidential bid, thinning the Democratic field, and allowing him to focus on a contested race for re-election in his Ohio Congressional district.

Mr. Kucinich, who campaigned on a strong antiwar message, was never able to gain much traction in the polls. He was excluded from the recent Democratic debates in New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina as networks tightened the rules for participation. The televised debates had been the main venue for getting out his campaign's message.

Mr. Kucinich, a former mayor of Cleveland and a six-term congressman, has a tough primary fight on his hands in Ohio's 10th Congressional District. Four other Democrats are trying to defeat him on March 4.

One of his rivals, Joe Cimperman, a member of the Cleveland City Council, has been running commercials calling Mr. Kucinich a "part-time congressman" more interested in seeking higher office. And Mr. Kucinich recently posted an "urgent personal appeal" for contributions on his Congressional re-election Web site.
Click on the link to his website above to help him out. If we can't have him as President, let's make damn sure we still have him fighting for us in Congress.

With Dennis gone, we're left with... The Mod Squad?




Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, January 24, 2008
Bush: Congress is so cute when they try to use that "separation of powers" thing
posted by Wally
8:18 AM

It might be just a "god damn piece of paper" to Bush, but to most Americans, the Constitution actually means something. If only Congress felt the same way.

Once again, Bush is trying an end-run around the Constitution, and almost nobody is paying attention. This time, he's attempting to commit the U.S. into entering into a treaty with the Iraqi government - something that, according to the U.S. Constitution, must be ratified by Congress. Of course, it also says that only Congress can declare war - something they have yet to do in Iraq - so we see how much weight that damn peice of paper really carries over in the halls of the government allegedly outlined and defined by that same Constitution.
President Bush and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki issued a joint letter in November. On the surface, the "Declaration of Principles" appears as a mutual "expression of friendship," as it has been characterized by administration officials.

The "Declaration of Principles" includes language that seems run-of-the-mill. The United States will help get Iraq into the World Trade Organization. The two countries will engage in scientific and cultural exchanges.

But it also includes a provision that promises to maintain the stability of Iraq's government from "internal and external threats." This sentence is raising alarms for some U.S. lawmakers.

Any such agreement would be considered a treaty by many legal experts. And under the U.S. Constitution, treaties have to be ratified by Congress.

"The declaration of principles would appear to commit the United States to keeping the elected Iraqi government in power against internal threats," says Kenneth Katzman, a Middle East analyst at the Congressional Research Service. "I leave it to the lawyers to determine whether that's the definition of a treaty or not but it certainly seems to be - is going to be - a hefty U.S. commitment to Iraq for a long time."

Such a hefty commitment would be unprecedented in the history of American foreign policy.
Maybe Bush ignoring Congress and violating the Constitution has become so commonplace that it doesn't even raise an eyebrow anymore. But come on Congress. This is your job. Every single freaking one of you, just like Dubya, swore an oath of office to "defend the Constitution of the United States." Surprise us all and do your fucking job for a change. Stop letting this traitorous son of a bitch wipe his ass with our Constitution.

Full story at NPR

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

The Bush Legacy, in a nutshell
posted by Wally
7:51 AM

The House Democratic Caucus put together this handy chart comparing the state of the nation at the beginning of Dubya's presidency to the state of the nation after 7 years with him in office.

Click the image for a larger version.

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Republicans: "Screw 'em, they're too young to vote, and too poor to donate"
posted by Wally
7:27 AM

That's what the GOP essentially said about poor and lower middle class kids yesterday when they sided with Bush's veto of the SCHIP (State Children's Health Insurance Program) expansion. As health care and health insurance rates skyrocket, Bush and the Republicans refuse to increase payments into the program to even keep up.

With the economy spiralling into recession, more people unemployed or underemployed (losing your job as an electrical engineer and out of desperation taking a new one flipping burgers means you are officially "employed" - but it's hardly the same thing), with gas prices and food prices rising with no end in sight, with health care costs going through the roof, what do the Republicans think we should do about health care for those 9 million uninsured kids? Not a damn thing, apparently.
House Democrats failed for the second time in three months Wednesday to override President Bush's veto of a proposed $35 billion expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program.

The 260-152 tally left backers of the legislation about 15 votes short of the two-thirds majority of lawmakers voting necessary to override the president's Dec. 12 veto. Forty-two Republicans supported the override attempt, two fewer than in the previous effort to reject Bush's Oct. 3 veto of an earlier version of the bill.

"With the economy taking a sour turn, now is not the time to deny the most innocent and helpless Americans - children whose parents can't afford health insurance - what they so desperately need," said Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.

The vetoed bills would have expanded the $5 -billion-a-year program by an average of $7 billion a year over the next five years, for total funding of $60 billion over the period. That would have boosted enrollment to 10 million children, up from 6.6 million, and substantially reduced the ranks of the nation's 9 million uninsured children, supporters said.
Seven billion a year. That's about a week's worth of war in Iraq. Republicans are climbing over each other to throw money into that quagmire of violence, chaos and slaughter, but refuse to provide basic health care to poor children here at home.

That's all you need to know about what is really important to the GOP.

Republican Priorities

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Shocker!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:02 PM

Cheney wants surveillance law expanded

Vice President Dick Cheney prodded Congress on Wednesday to extend and broaden an expiring surveillance law, saying "fighting the war on terror is a long-term enterprise" that should not come with an expiration date.

"We're reminding Congress that they must act now," Cheney told the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. The law, which authorizes the administration to eavesdrop on e-mails and phone calls to and from suspected terrorists, expires on Feb. 1. Congress is bickering over terms of its extension.

On Tuesday, Senate Republicans blocked an effort by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to extend the stopgap Protect America Act without expanding it, raising stakes for an expected showdown in the Senate later this week on a new version of the law.

"This cause is bigger than the quarrels of party and the agendas of politicians," Cheney said. "And if we in Washington, all of us, can only see our way clear to work together, then the outcome should not be in doubt."

Dems will cave

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Why couldn't this have been Limbaugh?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
12:59 PM

Bush cancels event after Ledger's death

The death of Heath Ledger prompted the White House to postpone President Bush's event Wednesday promoting an ad campaign aimed at preventing prescription drug abuse.

Ledger, 28, who was nominated for an Oscar for "Brokeback Mountain," was found dead Tuesday in his New York apartment. There were sleeping pills near him, but the cause of his death remains under investigation.

The president was to make a statement in the Roosevelt Room on the Office of National Drug Control Policy's television advertisement about preventing prescription drug abuse. A federally financed study released in December at the White House showed illicit drug use by teens continued to gradually decline overall this year, but the use of prescription painkillers remained popular among young people.

D.A.R.E.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:52 AM

Use the "post a comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya at the library.


Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Independent Study Finds Bush "Unequivocally" Lied U.S. into War with Iraq
posted by Wally
7:37 AM

A nonprofit collaboration of two independent, non-governmental organizations has concluded that President Bush used at least 532 misleading and deceptively false statements to justify military action against Iraq. In all, the Bush administration as a whole used a mind-numbing 935 false statements to goad America into war with Iraq. Calling their findings "an orchestrated deception on the path to war," the partnership report may very well be the first fully comprehensive investigation that incontrovertibly proves the Bush administration lied this nation into an unfounded war.

The Center for Public Integrity and the Fund for Independence in Journalism determined, through a collective study and breakdown of Bush administration speeches, press briefings and interviews, that Bush and other top officials "led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information."

According to the report, Bush alone lied more than 259 times, including 232 false statements "about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq" and "28 about Iraq's links to al-Qaida." Quoting Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith of the Fund for Independence in Journalism, "It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to al-Qaida." Furthermore, the shared study noted, "the statements were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses."

In what may be the first true, categorical "War Report Card" that separates fact from fiction, fine tunes mass distortion into utter clarity, the Center for Public Integrity makes a compelling case that "Following 9/11, President Bush and seven top officials of his administration waged a carefully orchestrated campaign of misinformation about the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq."
This leads to two obvious questions: 1) They had to do a study to figure this out? Next they'll do a study to find out that the sun rises in the east and grass is green. 2) Can we finally put impeachment back on the table?

"War crimes" begin with Dubya

You can read the full report at the Center For Public Integrity

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, January 22, 2008
The second coming of Reagan drops out!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
3:39 PM

Goodbye Grandpa Fred:

Thompson abandons White House bid


Former Sen. Fred Thompson on Tuesday ended his run for the presidency, coming off the heels of a disappointing third-place finish in South Carolina's GOP primary and heading into the showdown state of Florida next week.

"Today I have withdrawn my candidacy for president of the United States," Thompson said in a statement.

"I hope that my country and my party have benefited from our having made this effort. Jeri and I will always be grateful for the encouragement and friendship of so many wonderful people."

Thompson entered the race in September, long after his Republican rivals had announced their candidacies and began raising money. His campaigning style was criticized as lackluster, and he was never able to capitalize on the anticipation supporters had built before he announced that he was getting into the race.

Thompson was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1994 and represented Tennessee for eight years.

Naptime!

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Guess who else isn't paying his campaign workers
posted by Wally
3:36 PM

No, it's not 9iu11iani. That's so last week. Everyone knows that Willard "Mitt" Romney lights cigars with $100 bills, so it's not him. Fred finally gave up and dropped out - not that anyone would notice. And McCain has become the "comeback kid" - he's not even carrying his own luggage anymore.

Nope, this time it's the Huckster's turn to grovel for help and for volunteers.
In a sign of the financial difficulties facing Republican Mike Huckabee, his presidential campaign said Tuesday that top advisers are working without pay and some aides have left.

Campaign contributions continue to come in, he said. But he acknowledged that the former Arkansas governor is stretched thin as he tries to compete in Florida's primary next Tuesday and many of the two dozen states holding contests Feb. 5.

Huckabee told reporters late Monday he would evaluate the situation in Florida daily and decide whether to keep campaigning in the state. His campaign has stopped arranging charter flights, hotel reservations and other means of helping journalists keep up with his movements. News organizations pay their own expenses, but empty seats on charter planes were costing the campaign money.

Rollins said the campaign plans to run some ads on cable stations in Florida, but it cannot afford broadcast rates. Huckabee is splitting time between Florida, Georgia and Arkansas this week.
Meantime, the Democrats are rolling in it. Remember when it was the Republicans who had more money than they could spend, and the Dems still at least came close in the elections (they just didn't have enough to afford the legal fights to get the votes counted accurately). Let's see how well the GOP does now that the tables are turned.

Poor Poor Huckabee

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Captain Kangaroo Calls on Israel to Invade Iran
posted by Wally
2:18 PM

Now that the NIE has come out with it's intelligence assessment saying that Iran doesn't have a nuclear program, and hasn't had one since 2003, the Bush administration has lost momentum on their headlong drive to start their third war.

Josh Bolton, Bush's former ambassador to the U.N., has a way around pesky things like "facts" and "intelligence" and "sanity". Since it doesn't look like the U.S. is going to invade Iran on it's own any time soon, he's calling for the next best thing. Have Israel do our dirty work. Let them invade Iran and then draw us into the conflict.
"One can say with some assurance that in the next year the use of force by the United States is highly unlikely," Bolton told AFP on the sidelines of the Herzliya conference on the balance of Israel's national security.

"That increases the pressure on Israel in that period of time... if it feels Iran is on the verge of acquiring that capability, it brings the decision point home to use force," he said.


The hawkish former diplomat said that after a US intelligence report published late last year that claimed Iran had suspended a nuclear weapons programme in 2003, the US was unlikely to take military action against it.

"The pressure is on Israel now after the National Intelligence Estimate because, I think, the likelihood of American use of force has been dramatically reduced," he said.
What the fuck is wrong with these people that they are so determined to go to war? Hey Josh, I have an idea. Grab a gun and a helmet and march your walrus-looking ass into Iran and invade that country yourself. I'll be home cheering for you. Hell Josh, I might even slap a ribbon on my car in support of your effort.

Can't spell War without Dubya

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Happy Anniversary Roe -v- Wade
posted by Wally
8:10 AM

35 years ago today, the Supreme Court gave women control over their own bodies

100 years ago, women couldn't even get contraceptives. Hell, they couldn't even vote in most places. They were essentially "property" of their husbands. Today thanks to the dedicated efforts and decades or centuries of hard work, American women are in charge of their own lives and their own bodies. At least for now.
"Prior to Roe," said David Garrow, a law professor at Cambridge University, and a longtime Supreme Court scholar, "whether one could obtain a legal abortion in the face of an unwanted pregnancy was a crapshoot. For 30 years now, it's been a constitutionally guaranteed right."

But the ruling was a qualified one, as many anti-abortion supporters have noted over the years, and that fact has been used by them in their efforts to narrow the scope of other abortion provisions. Blackmun noted the state's "important interests in safeguarding health, maintaining medical standards, and protecting potential life" are compelling enough to justify regulation "at some point in pregnancy."

They found success last year when the justices in a sharply divided 5-4 ruling upheld a federal ban on a controversial a late-term procedure, rejecting concerns the law didn't take into account the physical safety of the mother.

The swing vote, as in previous cases, came from Kennedy. In angry dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the lone woman on the high court since O'Connor stepped down, called the majority's conclusions "alarming" and said they "cannot be understood as anything other than an effort to chip away a right declared again and again by this court, and with increasing comprehension of its centrality to women's lives."
The battle continues. This is another very important reason to make sure we have a Democratic President and Congress - the remaining Supreme Court justices who support a woman's right to choose aren't getting any younger. The next appointees will play a vital role in this fight for a generation. We've seen who Dubya has picked for that role. We can't afford to allow the right wing to choose another.

Happy Anniversary

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, January 21, 2008
Mark Your Calenders
posted by Wally
9:20 AM

One year from today, we will have a new President. Whether it's Obama or Hillary or John, on January 20th 2008, a new President will be in augurated, and this assclown will be gone. In 365 days, America will wake up with a new commander in chief, and the world will be a better place.



Don't let the door hit you in the ass Dubya. Assuming you can figure out how to operate such a complex mechanism.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
8:39 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya driving a standing landmower towards members of the press during his tour of Wright Manufacturing, Inc., Friday, Jan. 18, 2008, in Frederick, Md.

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Fact: Time waits for no man.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:07 AM

Unless that man is Chuck Norris.

Norris says McCain too old for president

Campaigning for Mike Huckabee, actor Chuck Norris said Sunday that Sen. John McCain is too old to handle the pressures of being president.

"I didn't pick John to support because I'm just afraid that the vice president would wind up taking over his job in that four-year presidency," said Norris, who was hosting a fundraiser for Huckabee at his Lone Wolf Ranch.

"So we need to find someone that can handle it for four years or eight years ... that has the youth and vision and communication skills to make that work." Norris, 67, is four years younger than McCain, who will be 72 in August.

Huckabee will be 52 in August.

Delta Farce

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

I Have a Dream
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:51 AM

Saw this on DailyKos. LOL!

Mitt Romney wishes you a happy Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day. [Kagro X]

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, January 20, 2008
Isn't that convenient
posted by Clyde
6:06 AM

White House missing CIA, Iraq e-mails

Apparent gaps in White House e-mail archives coincide with dates in late 2003 and early 2004 when the administration was struggling to deal with the CIA leak investigation and the possibility of a congressional probe into Iraq intelligence failures.

The gaps - 473 days over a period of 20 months - are cited in a chart prepared by White House computer technicians and shared in September with the House Reform and Government Oversight Committee, which has been looking into reports of missing e-mail.

Among the times for which e-mail may not have been archived from Vice President Dick Cheney's office are four days in early October 2003, just as a federal probe was beginning into the leak of Valerie Plame's CIA identity, an inquiry that eventually ensnared Cheney's chief of staff.

Contents of the chart - which the White House now disputes - were disclosed Thursday by Rep. Henry Waxman, a California Democrat who chairs the House committee, as he announced plans for a Feb. 15 hearing.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

So much for the pardon route
posted by Clyde
5:56 AM

In Legal Cases, C.I.A. Officers Turn to Insurer

When Jose A. Rodriguez Jr. came under investigation for ordering the destruction of Central Intelligence Agency interrogation videotapes, one of his first calls was to a small Virginia insurance company that thrives on government trouble.

Like a growing number of C.I.A. employees, Mr. Rodriguez, former head of the agency's clandestine service, had bought professional liability insurance from Wright & Company. The firm, founded in 1965 by a former F.B.I. agent, is now paying his mounting legal bills.

The standard Wright policy costs a little less than $300 a year. The government pays half the premium for all supervisors and certain other high-risk employees, a group that includes hundreds of C.I.A. officers, including everyone at the agency involved in counterterrorism or counterproliferation.

The more scandal official Washington produces, the better for Wright's niche business for federal employees. Every whiff of investigation or litigation drives additional nervous federal workers to the company's door.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Nothing is for free when you're Republican
posted by Clyde
5:42 AM

Charity draws fire for paying generals

Retired Army Gen. Tommy Franks was paid $100,000 - out of donations made to wounded veterans - for allowing his name to be used on fundraising appeals by a charity that has come under increasing scrutiny for the way it handles its money.

Lawmakers questioned the ethics of the Coalition to Salute America's Heroes Foundation not only for using donors' money to pay Franks, but for failing to disclose to potential donors who received the mail solicitations that Franks was paid for his endorsement.

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said Franks has now disassociated himself from the Coalition and asked that his name not be used in connection with the solicitations.

Franks' endorsement helped the charity raise "millions of dollars more" than it otherwise could have, said Roger Chapin, president of Help Hospitalized Veterans and the Coalition to Salute America's Heroes Foundation. At a hearing Thursday, Chapin said he is also paying retired Air Force Brig. Gen. Arthur "Chip" Diehl III $5,000 a month for similar assistance.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, January 19, 2008
I Like These Odds
posted by Wally
1:52 PM

9 out of 10 of the "most likely seats to change party control" in both houses of Congress are currently held by Republicans.

That's 9 out of 10 in the House, and 9 out of 10 in the Senate.

Top 10, starting with the Most Vulnerable:
SENATE
10. Mississippi (OPEN Republican-held seat; Lott resigned)
9. Alaska (Republican Sen. Ted Stevens running for re-election)
8. Oregon (Republican Sen. Gordon Smith running for re-election)
7. Maine (Republican Sen. Susan Collins running for re-election)
6. Minnesota (Republican Sen. Norm Coleman running for re-election)
5. Colorado (OPEN Republican-held seat; Sen. Wayne Allard retiring)
4. Louisiana (Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu running for re-election)
3. New Hampshire (Republican Sen. John Sununu running for re-election)
2. New Mexico (OPEN Republican-held seat; Sen. Pete Domenici retiring)
1. Virginia (OPEN Republican-held seat; Sen. John Warner retiring)

House
10. Louisiana's 6th district (OPEN Republican-held seat; Baker resigning)
9. California's 11th district (Democratic Rep. Jerry McNerney running for re-election)
8. Minnesota's 3rd district (OPEN Republican-held seat; Rep. Jim Ramstad retiring)
7. New Mexico's 1st district (OPEN Republican-held seat; Rep. Heather Wilson running for Senate)
6. Ohio's 15th district (OPEN Republican-held seat; Rep. Deborah Pryce retiring)
5. New Jersey's 7th district (OPEN Republican-held seat; Rep. Mike Ferguson retiring)
4. Illinois' 11th district (OPEN Republican-held seat; Rep. Jerry Weller retiring)
3. Arizona's 1st district (OPEN Republican-held seat; Rep. Rick Renzi retiring)
2. New Jersey's 3rd district (OPEN Republican-held seat; Rep. Jim Saxton retiring)
1. Ohio's 16th district (OPEN Republican-held seat; Rep. Ralph Regula retiring)
If we get 60 in the Senate, it's a filibuster-proof majority. Still work to do to reach that goal, but it's within sight.

Don't Forget Congress!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Rat, ship. You know the drill. Bonus: It's Bush's Top Negogiator to Iran
posted by Wally
1:39 PM

Nicholas Burns is latest in the exodus of U.S. diplomats over the past year

Nicholas Burns, one of the most high-profile diplomats at the State Department, is resigning and will be replaced by U.S. Ambassador to Moscow William Burns, the State Department said Friday.

As undersecretary of state for political affairs, Nicholas Burns dealt with many of the most controversial issues facing the Bush administration, including negotiations with India on its nuclear weapons program and the future of Kosovo. He is the top negotiator on Iran, spearheading the effort to break the deadlock on a U.N. resolution imposing new sanctions on Iran.

Burns, 51, is the latest of almost 20 top diplomats to depart over the past year. He is leaving for personal reasons and has not committed to another job, U.S. officials said.
"Personal reasons" huh? I'm sure that there are literally million$ of per$onal rea$on$ for his departure. As for not having "committed" to another job - that means he's still negotiating his $alary.

And stay out!

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Dueling Headlines - The Occupation
posted by Clyde
5:16 AM

Military: 75% of Baghdad areas now secure

Nationalists Stirring in Iraq

Iraq forces could control all provinces this year - US

Power cuts plague Iraq, hurt oil production

Praise, but no Iraq timeline

Southern Iraq clashes leave at least 40 dead

Despite dropping violence, Gates calls for extended U.S. presence in Iraq

Heavy security for Iraq Shi'ite ritual

The Surge Works! Well Kinda

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Only 7/8 required in the "Army of One"
posted by Clyde
5:00 AM

Report: Troops to war despite broken leg, torn rotator cuffs

Soldiers who were medically unfit or considered borderline have been sent to the Middle East to meet Army goals for "deployable strength," The Denver Post reported Thursday.

Quoting internal Army e-mails and a Fort Carson soldier, the newspaper said that more than 50 troops were deployed to Kuwait en route to Iraq while they were still getting medical treatment for various conditions. At least two have been sent home.

Capt. Scot Tebo, the surgeon for Fort Carson's 3rd Brigade Combat Team, wrote in an e-mail obtained by the newspaper that "We have been having issues reaching deployable strength, and thus have been taking along some borderline soldiers who we would otherwise have left behind for continued treatment."

Master Sgt. Denny Nelson said he was sent to Kuwait last month despite a severe foot injury. He was sent back to Fort Carson after a military doctor in Kuwait wrote that he never should have been shipped out.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Another "go f*ck youself" moment?
posted by Clyde
4:44 AM

Denver lawyer seeks to depose Cheney in assault case

Secret Service agents have given such varied accounts of what led to the 2006 arrest of a Denver man accused of assaulting Vice President Dick Cheney, the man's attorney says there may be only one way to clear things up - depose the vice president.

David Lane, lawyer for Steven Howards, said he plans to file a motion in federal court in Washington, D.C., next week to question Cheney under oath. Attorneys for the vice president have refused repeated requests for a deposition, he said.

"Given the wide differences of view, he is the only one with certain knowledge," Lane said, according to a story in Friday's New York Times.

According to depositions already taken of the five Secret Service agents involved in the Beaver Creek arrest, only some of the agents saw the encounter, in which Howards critized the administration's policies in Iraq.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, January 18, 2008
Unlike George H.W. Bush's son
posted by Wally
8:32 AM

Bin Laden son wants to be peace activist

Omar Osama bin Laden bears a striking resemblance to his notorious father - except for the dreadlocks that dangle halfway down his back. Then there's the black leather biker jacket. The 26-year-old does not renounce his father, al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, but in an interview with The Associated Press, he said there is better way to defend Islam than militancy: Omar wants to be an "ambassador for peace" between Muslims and the West.

Omar - one of bin Laden's 19 children - raised a tabloid storm last year when he married a 52-year-old British woman, Jane Felix-Browne, who took the name Zaina Alsabah. Now the couple say they want to be advocates, planning a 3,000-mile horse race across North Africa to draw attention to the cause of peace.

"It's about changing the ideas of the Western mind. A lot of people think Arabs — especially the bin Ladens, especially the sons of Osama - are all terrorists. This is not the truth," Omar told the AP last week at a cafe in a Cairo shopping mall.

Of course, many may have a hard time getting their mind around the idea of "bin Laden: peacenik."
It's a lot easier to get our mind around bin Laden as a peacenik than Dubya. Will Jenna and Barbara heed this lesson and try to become ambassadors of peace too? If not, the best way for them to demonstrate their continued support for their daddy's policies is to enlist. Maybe then they can help find Osama. Remember Osama?

bin Laden: peacenik

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:26 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya watching children dance at the Sheikh Saeed Al Maktoum House in Dubai.

Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, January 17, 2008
Have we hit bottom yet?
posted by Wally
2:28 PM

Canada puts U.S. on torture watch list

CTV News has learned that, as part of a "torture awareness workshop," diplomats are now being told where to watch for abuse.

The aim of the workshop: to teach diplomats who visit Canadians in foreign jails how to tell if they've been tortured. It also listed countries and places with greater risks of torture. The list includes Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, and China. But surprisingly, it also included the United States, Guantanamo Bay, and Israel.

It notes specific "U.S. interrogation techniquies," which include "forced nudity, isolation, and sleep deprivation." The U.S. has repeatedly denied allegations by international groups that it tortures prisoners captured in places like Afghanistan and Iraq. However, U.S. officials have refused to comment on the Canadian list.

Even the Canadians are pissed off at us

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Suddenly, the Bush White House turns "green"?
posted by Wally
7:58 AM

The White House is once again getting creative - like a kid who didn't do his homework - in coming up with excuses for defying yet another direct court order. The Bush administration is now pointing the blame for losing millions of emails on - I'm not making this up - "recycling.
E-mail messages sent and received by White House personnel during the first three years of the Bush administration were routinely recorded on tapes that were "recycled," the White House's chief information officer said in a court filing this week.

During the period in question, the Bush presidency faced some of its biggest controversies, including the Iraq war, the leak of former CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson's name and the CIA's destruction of interrogation videotapes.

White House spokesman Tony Fratto said he has no reason to believe any e-mails were deliberately destroyed.
No reason to believe they were deliberately destroyed? Come on Tony, how about these three for starters: "the Iraq war, the leak of former CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson's name and the CIA's destruction of interrogation videotapes."
Two federal statutes require presidential communications, including e-mails involving senior White House aides, to be preserved for the nation's historical record, and some historians responded to the court disclosure yesterday by urging that the White House's actions be thoroughly probed.
In other words, by stating that these emails were destroyed, the White House is publicly confessing to committing a federal offense. Accidental or not, destroying these records is a crime. The statutes are very clear and unambiguous in stating that all presidential records must be protected and saved. "My dog ate my homework" didn't work in third grade, and it sure as hell shouldn't work for high crimes in high public office. We have the crime. We have the confession.

Arrest these men.

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Think they'll send him to Gitmo?
posted by Wally
7:38 AM

Isn't that what Bush does to people who give money to Al Qaeda and the Taliban? Oh, never mind, he's a Republican ex-congressman, so he'll be pardoned.
A federal grand jury on Wednesday indicted a former congressman originally from Chicago on charges that he was connected to a terrorist funding network that channeled money to an Afghan warlord who supported Al Qaeda and the Taliban.

Mark Siljander, 56, a former Republican member of the U.S. House representing Michigan who was raised and educated in Chicago and the suburbs, faces charges of money laundering, conspiracy and obstruction of justice.

Authorities allege that Siljander lied about lobbying on behalf of a Missouri-based Islamic charity accused of sending funds to terrorists. Authorities further allege that Siljander accepted a payment of $50,000 for his efforts to lobby senators to restore the charity's eligibility to receive government work. The money Siljander was paid turned out to be stolen from the U.S. Agency for International Development, according to the indictment.
I thought the GOP was strong on defense and tough on terror. Now we get to see just how tough on terror they really are, when it's one of their own.

Waterboard him

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush wins again.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:28 AM

The Dems are squandering their opportunity in 2008:

Congress reaches deal on new defense bill after Bush veto

Congress has reached a compromise with the White House over a defense authorization bill provision that had drawn complaints from the Iraqi government.

Those complaints prompted President Bush to veto the defense bill last month. He complained that a provision in the bill that allowed victims of terrorism to be awarded compensation from frozen foreign assets of state sponsors of terror could have crippled the fledgling Iraqi government with billions of dollars in liability.

Under the compromise, Iraq is excluded from the provision, but other state sponsors of terrorism, such as Iran and Syria, could see frozen assets used as compensation. The compromise is likely to leave American victims taken hostage and tortured by Saddam Hussein's regime during the first Gulf War without recourse in U.S. federal court.

The new language allows the president to waive the entire provision with regards to claims against Iraq for acts of terrorism that happened before or on the date of the enactment of the 2008 defense authorization bill. The president is required to make a national security determination before issuing a waiver and must notify Congress 30days prior to issuing it.

Pussies

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, January 16, 2008
We must remain vigilant against Luxembourgian terrorism!
posted by Clyde
12:56 PM

US fears Europe-based terrorism

One of the biggest threats to US security may now come from within Europe, US Homeland Security head Michael Chertoff has told the BBC.

He said militant attacks and plots in Europe over recent years had made the US aware of the "real risk that Europe will become a platform for terrorists".

Mr Chertoff said it was likely security checks on travellers from Europe would be increased.

But he said steps would be taken to ensure travel and trade were not hit.

(Link)

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

She looks like a husky!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:52 AM

I can't stand Katie Couric, but this is funny:

Couric caught making unguarded comments during N.H. primary coverage

My Damn Channel brings us behind the scenes at CBS News, showing untold numbers of web surfers what anchor Katie Couric had to say about the presidential candidates in between live shots from the New Hampshire primaries.

"Give me one interesting exit poll please," she yells in between segments. Couric makes a cutting motion across her neck when she refers to former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani and acknowledges that she doesn't know much about former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.

Later, Couric offers an assessment of Cindy McCain, the wife of Arizona Sen. John McCain.

"She has pretty eyes. They're freaking me out a little," Couric says of McCain's wife, adding: "She looks like a husky. You know, those weird blue eyes. ... Cindy McCain has the most intense eyes, they're like light ice blue. And she had a purple suit on and I mean they were so intense I couldn't stop staring at her. She must have thought I was weird."

Husky

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wexler Calls For Cheney's Impeachment
posted by Wally
7:50 AM

Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Fla.) is urging the House Judiciary Committee to begin impeachment hearings against Vice President Dick Cheney, despite opposition from House Democratic leaders.

"There's a litany of issues that need to be heard," Wexler said. "This administration has abused the power of executive privilege. This administration has completely avoided testifying before Congress on any one of a host of six, seven, eight issues.

"Whether we are talking about the manipulation of intelligence on Iraq," he went on, "whether we are talking about the outing of a covert CIA agent, whether we're talking about the illegal use of torture, whether we're talking about the potentially unlawful firing of U.S. prosecutors - on all of these issues, the administration has thus far successfully used the power of executive privilege."

"In an impeachment hearing, the administration does not have the power of executive privilege," Wexler said, noting that the secret tapes that helped bring down President Richard Nixon did not surface until the House Judiciary Committee began impeachment hearings.

Thank you Rep. Wexler

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Miners aren't rich enough to donate millions to campaigns, so screw 'em
posted by Wally
7:39 AM

Bush threatens to veto House mine-safety bill

President Bush threatened yesterday to veto a bill aimed at improving safety in the nation's coal mines, a day before the House was scheduled to vote on it.

"It is absolutely unacceptable that the White House is threatening to further impede safety efforts and continue endangering the lives of innocent miners right here in Kentucky and throughout the nation," the Louisville congressman John Yarmuth said.

(snip)

Rep. George Miller, D-CA rejected the criticisms, saying "Congress has been forced to act to improve mine safety because of the Bush administration's total failure to work aggressively to keep miners safe on the job."

"The Bush administration has never made mine safety a priority, even going so far as to appoint former industry executives to key positions in the Mine Safety and Health Administration -- a clear case of the fox guarding the hen house," he said.

Miners get the shaft

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:22 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" Link to submit your caption of Dubya eyeballing the Crown Prince of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi Sheikh Mohammed Bin Zayed al-Nahayan's falcon.


(thanks to our old friend Bob Kincaid at Head-On Radio for the picture)

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Dubya's ongoing "War on Intelligence"
posted by Wally
9:48 AM

Bush prefers his own "faith-based" intelligence over the CIA's and NIE's "fact-based" intelligence. Or, as Reagan once said "Facts are stupid things".
Artificial Intelligence
President Bush's cavalier dismissal of the NIE undermines our credibility, again.

President George W. Bush hasn't accomplished much on his voyage to the Middle East, but he did take the time to inflict another wound on the entire U.S. intelligence community - and on the credibility of anything he might ever again say about the world.

In the latest Newsweek, Michael Hirsh reports that, during a private conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Bush "all but disowned" the agencies' Dec. 3 National Intelligence Estimate on Iran. A "senior administration official who accompanied Bush" on the trip confided to Hirsh that Bush "told the Israelis that he can't control what the intelligence community says, but that [the NIE's] conclusions don't reflect his own views."

The NIE - which was signed by all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies - concluded "with high confidence" that Iran had "halted its nuclear weapons program" back in the fall of 2003. The estimate, released to the public in sanitized form, seriously undercut efforts by the Bush-Cheney White House to portray Iran's nuclear ambitions as an imminent threat - and left the world either relieved or (especially in Israel's case) alarmed that the option of a U.S. airstrike on Iran was pretty much off the table.

(snip)

Now President Bush is splashing doubt not just on the CIA, but on all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies, simply because their judgments are out of synch with his policies.
Same story, different agency. Any time anyone disagrees with Bush and his administration, they are marginalized and ignored, or they end up "spending more time with their family". Fortunately for the U.S. and for the world, Dubya can't kick out all 16 intelligence agencies. In a "he said/they ALL said" situation, Bush is now, finally, standing on the losing side.

Artificial Intelligence

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

I thought Bush was a fan of "free market" forces
posted by Wally
7:45 AM

Ever since Bush took office - even as governor of Texas, he's been a big fan of unrestrained capitalism and free market forces. Any time the question of government regulation over industry has arisen, whether about fuel ecomony for cars and trucks, unrestricted oil drilling and mining in places like our national parks and seashores, minimum wage and workers rights, etc, Dubya has claimed that the best way to settle the issue is to let "market forces" do their thing to come to the best and fairest conclusion.

Now he is getting a taste of his own medicine, begging the Saudis to start pumping more oil to help the U.S. economy. Seriously. He actually said that.
"OPEC should understand that if they can put more supply on the market it will be helpful," Bush told reporters when asked what the producer group could do to alleviate high oil prices.

"I will say to Abdullah that high energy prices can affect economic growth because it's painful for our consumers ... could cause the U.S. economy to slow down."
Reuters
As if the Saudis, or anyone in the Middle East nowadays, gives a rat's ass about American consumers or the U.S. economy. How hard is Osama bin Laden laughing now?

The Saudis' response was predictable, and comes directly from the GOP and Gee Dubya Bush playbook. "Market Forces, biatch!
"Saudi Arabia will raise oil production only when the market justifies it, the kingdom's oil minister said Tuesday, in response to President Bush's request that OPEC nations increase output to reduce world oil prices.

"Our interest is to keep oil supplies matching demand with minimum volatility in the oil market," Oil Minister Ali Naimi told reporters. "We will raise production when the market justifies it. This is our policy."
It sucks when your own words and your own policies come back to slap you in the face, doesn't it.

Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, January 14, 2008
He must not like his job...
posted by Wally
7:40 AM

... because Joint Chief of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen is apparently doing his best to lose it.

After seeing the long line before him of those who have questioned or disagreed with the Bush administration, and have then been unceremoniously replaced, he should know that anything other than utter and complete obsequious compliance is grounds for dismissal.
Joint Chiefs chairman: Close Guantanamo

The chief of the U.S. military said he favors closing the prison here as soon as possible because he believes negative publicity worldwide about treatment of terrorist suspects has been "pretty damaging" to the image of the United States.

"I'd like to see it shut down," Adm. Mike Mullen said Sunday in an interview with three reporters who toured the detention center with him on his first visit since becoming chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff last October.

His visit came two days after the sixth anniversary of the prison's opening in January 2002. He stressed that a closure decision was not his to make and that he understands there are numerous complex legal questions the administration believes would have to be settled first, such as where to move prisoners.

Mullen, whose previous visit was in December 2005 as head of the U.S. Navy, noted that President Bush and Defense Secretary Robert Gates also have spoken publicly in favor of closing the prison. But Mullen said he is unaware of any active discussion in the administration about how to do it.
Now that the Defense Secretary, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and the freaking President have all said they want to close it, what are they waiting for? Why don't they just go ahead and close it. Is Bush really that weak and powerless? Who's stopping him?

Oh, never mind, there's still the dark one lurking in his undisclosed bunker. He doesn't like this kind of talk. It would be bad for his heart, if he had one. I wonder how long the Vegas bookies are giving Mullen before he decides to "spend more time with his family".

You're Fired!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:30 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya with United Arab Emirates President Sheik Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan in Abu Dhabi


Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, January 13, 2008
Politics can be a blood sport
posted by Clyde
7:33 AM

Take a break and fight your candidate all the way to the White House!


Careful, this can be addictive!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Torture - It's just a matter of perspective
posted by Clyde
7:29 AM

McConnell weighs in on waterboarding

The nation's intelligence chief says waterboarding "would be torture" if used against him or if someone under interrogation actually was taking water into his lungs.

But Mike McConnell, in a magazine interview, declined for legal reasons to say whether the technique categorically should be considered torture.

"If it ever is determined to be torture, there will be a huge penalty to be paid for anyone engaging in it," McConnell told The New Yorker, which published a 16,000-word article Sunday on the director of national intelligence.

The comments come as the House Intelligence Committee investigates the CIA's destruction of videotaped interrogations of two al-Qaida suspects. The tapes were made in 2002 and destroyed three years later, over fears they would leak. They depicted the use of "enhanced" interrogation techniques against two of the three men known to have been waterboarded by the CIA.

(Link)

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Pot - Meet Kettle
posted by Clyde
7:24 AM

Bush: Iran threatens global security

President Bush said Sunday that Iran is threatening the security of the world, and that the United States and Arab allies must join together to confront the danger "before it's too late."

Bush said Iran funds terrorist extremists, undermines peace in Lebanon, sends arms to the Taliban, seeks to intimidate its neighbors with alarming rhetoric, defies the United Nations and destabilizes the entire region by refusing to be open about its nuclear program.

"Iran is the world's leading state sponsor of terror," Bush said in a speech he delivered about mid-way through his eight-day Mideast trip that began with a renewed push for an Israeli-Palestinian peace pact - an accord he said whose "time has come."

"Iran's actions threaten the security of nations everywhere," Bush said. "So the United States is strengthening our long-standing security commitments with our friends in the Gulf, and rallying friends around the world to confront this danger before it is too late."

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, January 12, 2008
First hand testimony doesn't count in Bushmerika!
posted by Clyde
5:53 AM

Army: No evidence of random firing at Iraqis

A soldier's claim that he and another soldier randomly fired at Iraqi civilians while they patrolled neighborhoods in Baghdad is unfounded, Army investigators said Thursday.

"To date, our investigative processes that we have used have not been able to uncover any credible information or evidence to substantiate the recent allegations," said Chris Grey, spokesman for the Army Criminal Investigation Command.

Pfc. Bruce Bastien Jr. told investigators he and another soldier used stolen AK47s to fire on civilians, saying the distinct sound of the rifle favored by insurgents allowed them to claim they had come under fire.

Bastien faces first-degree murder charges in the slayings of two soldiers and made the allegations after his December arrest in one of the slayings. He and two former soldiers face charges in the December shooting death of Spc. Kevin Shields, while Bastien and one of those former soldiers face charges in the Aug. 4 shooting death of Pfc. Robert James.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

No worries, it's only life or death!
posted by Clyde
5:42 AM

Bush says no decision on troop levels

Facing another decision about U.S. troop levels in Iraq by spring, President Bush said Saturday it's "fine with me" if generals recommend no more reductions than those already planned to take the force posture down to about 130,000.

Traveling for the next few days among Sunni Arab-ruled states jittery about the rising influence and ambitions of Shiite-majority Iran, Bush used part of remarks here that were focused on Iraq to put Tehran on notice - again.

"Iran's role in fomenting violence has been exposed," he said as he listed successes the U.S. is helping to bring about in Iraq. "Iranian agents are in our custody, and we are learning more about how Iran has supported extremist groups with training and lethal aid."

After spending a day in Kuwait meeting with its leaders and addressing U.S. troops based here, Bush was traveling to Bahrain, an oil-refining and banking island in the Arabian sea that is host to the headquarters of the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, January 11, 2008
Because only 4 of the 19 hijackers were not from Saudi Arabia
posted by Wally
11:25 AM

It's bad enough that Bush is pushing through a $20 Billion arms sale to the country that brought you Osama bin Laden and 15 of the 19 September 11 hijackers. What's worse is that he's using it as a political stunt, timing it to coincide with his photo-op with his close friends in the Saudi royal family.
Administration Times $20 Billion Arms Sale With Saudi Visit

Bush administration will notify Congress on Monday of its intent to sell $20 billion in weapons, including precision-guided bombs, to Saudi Arabia, moving up the announcement to coincide with the president's arrival in Riyadh, The Associated Press has learned.

The official said the new timing was "appropriate" and "symbolic" as it would come within hours of Bush's arrival in Saudi Arabia, the penultimate stop on his current Middle East trip. Air Force One is scheduled to land in Riyadh on Monday after a stop in Dubai.

Although administration has staunchly defended the sale as critical to U.S. interests, its desire to sell Saudi Arabia sophisticated weaponry has raised eyebrows from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle who say the transfer of Joint Direct Attack Munitions technology would lend it highly accurate targeting abilities that could threaten Israel.

Those concerns have not been assuaged by the administration's plan to counterbalance the Saudi sale with $30 billion in military assistance to Israel - a more than 25 percent increase over the next 10 years - and statements from Israeli officials who say they understand the rationale for the sale and will not oppose it.
That's the way to "nudge" the old peace process along there George. Good plan.

You know who really loves this idea? Arms dealers. While their boy Georgie is mugging for the camera, starting wars, and supplying our enemies with weapons, the munitions manufacturers are making a killing, in every sense of the word. The rest of us pay the price.

Traitor!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Ma Bell gives the FBI a "time-out" for being naughty
posted by Wally
7:54 AM

Want to know who's really in power in this country? Here's a hint. The phone companies just did what Congress and the Courts couldn't do
.FBI Wiretap Cut Off After Feds Fail To Pay Telecom Spying Bills

Phone companies repeatedly cut off wiretaps used by the FBI to eavesdrop on criminal and terror suspects because the bureau failed to pay bills totalling tens of thousands of dollars, an audit showed today.

The US Justice Department audit showed that, in one office alone, an unpaid wiretap bill reached $66,000.

The audit - of which only a heavily-edited version has been released - painted a chaotic picture of financial mismanagement at the agency.

In addition to more than half of 990 wiretap bills in five FBI offices not being paid on time, it highlighted the FBI's lax oversight of money used in undercover investigations, which it also said had allowed one employee to steal $25,000.
Deadbeats

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:47 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya playing with fire


Permalink :: 8 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, January 10, 2008
2008: It's more than just America
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:00 AM

Europeans watch U.S. elections with heightened interest

You'd think they were electing their own president the way Europeans are following the U.S. presidential primaries this year.

The prospect of a first woman or African-American to become the U.S. commander in chief, tight races and a desire by many east of the Atlantic for a new direction from Washington is prompting Europeans to watch developments such as New Hampshire's primary far more closely than in other elections.

"There is a difference here so far this time," says Christian Hacke, a professor of foreign policy and U.S. relations at the University of Bonn. "It has become more and more an election for all of us."

.....

Another reason for the early attention here - in what former U.S. Defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld called "old Europe" - is that President Bush and his foreign policy are unpopular.

"There's much less interest in who the Republicans have running," says Cox, who teaches international relations at the London School of Economics. "I think that's a reaction against Bush."

Ding!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Surge! 3.0
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:54 AM

That "other" country:

U.S. may send 3,000 Marines to Afghanistan

The Pentagon is preparing to send at least 3,000 Marines to Afghanistan in April to bolster efforts to hold off another expected Taliban offensive in the spring, military officials said Wednesday.

The move represents a shift in Pentagon thinking that has been slowly developing after months of repeated insistence that the U.S. was not inclined to fill the need for as many as 7,500 more troops that commanders have asked for there. Instead, Defense Secretary Robert Gates pressed NATO allies to contribute the extra forces.

Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell said Wednesday that a proposal will go before Gates on Friday that would send a ground and air Marine contingent as well as a Marine battalion - together totaling more than 3,000 forces - to southern Afghanistan for a "one-time, seven-month deployment."

Gates, he said, will want to review the request, and is not likely to make a final decision on Friday.

"One time" my azz

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, January 9, 2008
Cheney will not be happy
posted by Wally
9:29 AM

Bush Restricts Gun Access For Mentally Deranged

President Bush finally decided to take action and sign a law meant to prevent the severely mentally ill from purchasing a gun. The state will grant $1.3 billion to improve the tracking and reporting of individuals who do not have the right to buy a gun. It is for the first time in 14 years that gun-control measures are being taken, following the tragic events at Virginia Tech, when gunman Seung-Hui Cho had unrestricted access to buying fire weapons despite him being declared mentally ill.

Furthermore, Rep. Carolyn McCarthy wants to put and end to the so-called 'gun show loophole' that allows dealers to sell firearms without background checks. Her efforts, together with those of New York Democrats Sen. Chuck Schumer, started five years ago, in 2002, after a priest and a parishioner were killed that year in a Lynbrook church.

"No one imagined it would take five years" said Schumer after President Bush signed the bill. "Had it become law earlier, it may have saved the lives of 32 students at Virginia Tech by another mentally ill gunman." Sen. Schumer is decided to take the law further and require background check for every gun sale, but unfortunately that will be a long fight, as the National Rifle association strongly opposes.
When is Dick going to take George hunting?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Gilligan would be proud
posted by Wally
8:35 AM

These are the leaky tubs that Bush says posed a "provocative threat" to U.S. Navy warships.

US President George W. Bush on Tuesday blamed Tehran for a "provocative" weekend face-off between US and Iranian ships as he prepared to take his warning that "Iran is a threat" to the Middle East.

"We viewed it as a provocative act. It is a dangerous situation and they should not have done it, pure and simple," Bush declared in his first public remarks on Sunday's incident in the Strait of Hormuz.

"My message today to the Iranians is, they shouldn't have done what they did," he added. "I don't know what their thinking was, but I'm telling you what I think it was, I think it was a provocative act.
If these are the kinds of boats that pose a serious threat to our Naval fleet, where the fuck are we spending all that Defense budget money?
For 2007, the budget rose to US $532.8 billion. This does not include many military-related items that are outside of the Defense Department budget, such as nuclear weapons research, maintenance and production (which is in the Department of Energy budget), Veterans Affairs or the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (which are largely funded through extra-budgetary supplements, e.g. $120 billion in 2007).

The 2005 U.S. military budget was larger than that of the next 14 biggest spenders combined, and over eight times larger than the official military budget of China. Military discretionary spending accounts for more than half of the U.S. federal discretionary spending.
What's worse, not only do we spend half of our available funding on a military that, according to the Commander in Chief, can't defend itself against leaky little speedboats armed with "boxes", it turns out that this "provocation" was quite possibly a hoax.
Iran's Revolutionary Guards say the US navy fabricated evidence that a convoy of its ships was harassed by Iranian speedboats in Gulf waters on Sunday.

"The footage released by the US Navy are file pictures and the audio has been fabricated," Iranian state-run TV quoted a Revolutionary Guards source as saying.
Granted, it's the Iranians claiming that the footage was a fake, which makes the claims dubious at best. But after the stories of WMDs and Iraq's connection to 9/11 and ability to strike the U.S. at a moment's notice and all the other excuses that led us to war and turned out to be wrong, who's the bigger liar? And the more dangerous one.

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:26 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya boarding Air Force One.

Permalink :: 6 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Leg two of the horserace goes to the Senator from New York
posted by Wally
1:39 AM

Proving the media cares more about covering their own asses than covering the story, rather than admitting they blew it and once again missed the obvious, they're trying to make it look like Hillary's NH victory was an unprecedented surprise. The headlines are calling it everything from a "surprise" to an "upset" to a "stunner" to calling her a "comeback kid" to (my personal favorite) "Clinton returns from political graveyard". Political graveyard? There was one freaking caucus. This is the first primary. What were they drinking that they think this is a "stunner", or she was in the "political graveyard"? Where can I get some?

Let's call it like it is:
Clinton Wins NH. Congratulations Hillary!

With 91 percent of Democratic precincts reporting Tuesday night amid record turnout for the state's primary, Clinton had 39 percent of the vote to 36 percent for Obama, who is seeking to become the nation's first black president.

Former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina trailed with 17 percent. Former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson had 5 percent and Rep. Dennis Kucinich had 1 percent.

"I come tonight with a very, very full heart, and I want especially to thank New Hampshire," Clinton told a jubliant crowd in Manchester. "Over the last week, I listened to you, and in the process I found my own voice.
MSNBC
The real story, and real surprise, just like in Iowa, is the turnout.
Voter turnout in New Hampshire sets new primary record

Voters excited about competitive races in both parties set a record for turnout in New Hampshire's primary Tuesday.

With ballots from 6 percent of voting precincts still to be counted, about 506,000 residents had cast votes, breaking the previous primary turnout record of 396,385 ballots cast in 2000.

voting officials in several towns briefly ran out of ballots and substituted unused absentee ballots or photocopied ballots.

"We're overwhelmed. We had to use extra paper ballots that we hadn't anticipated," said Salem moderator Charles Morse.
Boston Globe
They're talking 50% turnout for a primary election. We barely hit numbers like that in this country for a full-blown presidential election most of the time. People are pissed! I hate to get excited this early in the game, or get overconfident about these things, but in this case, like Dookie said in his post below, can you say "Landslide".

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, January 8, 2008
Why should they obey the courts this time?
posted by Wally
3:51 PM

Once again, as has happened so often in the past, the White House has been ordered by the courts to provide information. Once again, the White House is stone-walling, and if history is any indication, they'll simply blow off the courts and cry "executive privilege" and "national security".
White House told to provide e-mail info

A federal magistrate ordered the White House on Tuesday to reveal whether copies of possibly millions of missing e-mails are stored on computer backup tapes.

The order by U.S. Magistrate Judge John Facciola comes amid an effort by the White House to scuttle two lawsuits that could force the Executive Office of the President to recover any e-mail that has disappeared from computer servers where electronic documents are automatically archived.

In their lawsuits, the National Security Archive and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington suggest the e-mails were improperly deleted from White House computer servers. Over 5 million White House e-mails are missing, CREW alleged. Recently, the group said it has been told by reliable sources that the actual figure of missing e-mail is over 10 million.

In asking that the complaints be dismissed, the Bush administration says the president's record keeping practices under the Presidential Records Act are not reviewable by the courts. Also, the Federal Records Act does not allow the far-reaching action the two private groups are demanding, the administration contends.
The administration, by deleting these emails, broke the law at least 5 million times, and maybe as many as 10 million times. I wonder what the Vegas bookies are giving as odds that anyone actually gets punished.

10 million to one?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

L.A.N.D.S.L.I.D.E.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:31 PM

New Hampshire Turnout 'Absolutely Huge'

ABC News' Karen Travers Reports: New Hampshire Deputy Secretary of State Dave Scanlan told ABC News that turnout among primary voters today is "absolutely huge" -- and there are concerns about running out of ballots in towns like Portsmouth, Keene, Hudson and Pelham.

"Turnout is absolutely huge and towns are starting to get concerned that they may not have enough ballots," Scanlan said. "We are working on those issues. Everything else seems to be going smoothly."

Scanlan said that the Secretary of State's office is sending additional ballots to Portsmouth and Keene (traditionally Democratic strongholds), Hudson (Republican leaning with significant numbers of independents) and Pelham (large number of independents).

According to Scanlan, the ballot strain seems to be on Democratic ballots, which suggests that the undeclared voters are breaking for the Democratic primary. New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner predicted that 90,000 undeclared voters would vote in the Democratic primary compared to 60,000 voting in the Republican primary.

Down with the G.O.P.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

$2 Trillion
posted by Wally
9:12 AM

To paraphrase the late Senator Everett Dirksen "A trillion here, a trillion there, pretty soon we're talking real money." In this case, we're talking real money spent on health care. In fact, we're talking a whopping 16% of our gross domestic product (GDP) spent on health care.
The nation's health-care bill climbed above $2 trillion in 2006, averaging a record $7,026 per person, according to a government report released today. The report is likely to intensify the debate over curbing costs and covering the nation's 47 million uninsured people.

Costs increased 6.7 percent over 2005, according to the report by Medicare's actuaries - only slightly higher than the 6.5 percent rate in 2005. But it was still well above the overall rate of inflation.

"Many people involved in health care will say, 'Hey, wait a minute, 6.7 percent ... things are moderating,' but for average people ... they don't see this as moderation," said Ron Pollack, director of Families USA, a liberal advocacy group that promotes coverage for all.
Houston Chronicle
When you're getting a 1.5% pay increase, a 6.7% bill increase is NOT "moderating". An increase of 8.5% is even less moderate.
In one area, there was a pretty dramatic increase. Spending on prescription drugs went up 8.5 percent. That's $16 billion.

Health care consultant Bob Lasziewski says it's like a ship sinking at a reduced rate from how it was sinking before. "Health care is still increasing at twice the rate of inflation," he says. "Five years ago, it was four times the rate of inflation."

Paul Ginsburg sees other problems. He's president of the Center for Studying Health Systems Change, which has been studying health care costs in 25 communities around the country. For one thing, Ginsburg says if the economy hits a downturn and wages slump, health care costs will take a bigger bite out of every paycheck.
NPR
What does that bigger bite get us? It gets us last place in the "Preventable Deaths" category among developed nations.

If only we could translate that real money and that 16% of GDP into real good health care for everyone.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Mr. Franklin would like to have a word with you.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
9:02 AM

Some Free Speech On Mayor's Words

Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani discussed his philosophy of what freedom means in a democracy yesterday at a forum on urban crime, and his remarks left a civil libertarian puzzled and worried.

The Mayor, a former United States Attorney in Manhattan, said New Yorkers were inclined to "see only the oppressive side of authority."

"What we don't see is that freedom is not a concept in which people can do anything they want, be anything they can be," he said at the forum, sponsored by The New York Post. "Freedom is about authority. Freedom is about the willingness of every single human being to cede to lawful authority a great deal of discretion about what you do."

Asked later about his remarks, Mr. Giuliani said governmental authorities in American society had fallen into disrepute in the last 30 years. He said anarchy would result if everyone were allowed to behave exactly as he wanted and cited Oliver Wendell Holmes's adage that freedom of expression does not include shouting 'Fire!' in a crowded theater.

9/11


"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
~Benjamin Franklin

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Why Does New Orleans likes Edwards?
posted by Wally
8:12 AM

Democrats need a tough candidate who won't hesitate to kick the Republicans in the balls

It is not often we wish we lived in New Hampshire (nice place to visit), but we sorely wish we could be there on Tuesday to 'vote early and often' for John Edwards. Although we do not at all dislike the prospect of a President Obama, and though the nation would be in good hands if any one of the four Democratic candidates in Saturday's New Hampshire debate were to win the White House, we have long preferred the 2004 Democratic vice presidential candidate and former senator from North Carolina. (Edwards/Obama? In what order? The 'change' candidates could alternate being president/vice president.)

It is not only that John Edwards had the good sense and correct priorities to launch his campaign for the presidency from New Orleans (take note, presidential debate site committee). And it's not just Edwards' plan to remove all U.S. troops from Iraq within 10 months-something his competitors haven't offered. We don't favor Edwards only because he alone has spoken consistently as a populist public defender against the 'iron grip' of corporate special interests on Washington. Nor is he our favorite merely because he has the best health care plan (Paul Krugman's praise-'Edwards Gets It Right'-sounds right to us).

We vote for John Edwards for all of these reasons, but especially because Democrats need a tough, combative lead candidate to whip the Republicans, who are vicious fighters in a presidential campaign-especially when they're desperate. Barack Obama is marvelous and would also be a good president, but we worry he doesn't have the aggressiveness to kick the Republican operatives in the balls, the way they always do to Democrats.
That also explains why Ann Coulter is so afraid of him.

Bag-shot

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

A Woman's Place.....
posted by Wally
7:28 AM

... is in the House. Or the Senate. Or the White House.

Not that we agree with the sentiment, or that Hillary wouldn't make a fine president (we'll support any of the Dems currently running - regardless of which of them wins the nomination), but we thought this was pretty funny.
Protesters ask Clinton to iron shirts

Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign stop was interrupted Monday when two men stood in the crowd and began screaming, "Iron my shirt!" during one of her final appearances before the New Hampshire primary.



Clinton, a former first lady running to become the nation's first female president, laughed at the seemingly sexist protest that suggested a woman's place is doing the laundry and not running the country.

"Ah, the remnants of sexism - alive and well," Clinton said to applause in a school auditorium.
While we don't agree with everything she's done and stands for (just like all the candidates), we like the fact that she's a tough broad with a sense of humor. That and the fact that she knows how to iron a shirt.
"If there's anyone left in the auditorium who wants to learn how to iron a shirt, I'll talk about that," she said with a smile.
And make me a sammich too

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, January 7, 2008
Maybe he should stick to "Willard"
posted by Wally
9:37 AM

For a guy who goes by the name "Mitt", he sure throws like a girl.


In spite of his pus-arm, Willard "Mitt" Romney managed to win the Wyoming GOP caucus on Saturday. In other news, there was a GOP caucus in Wyoming on Saturday. (Click the picture for the full story on CNN)

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Dubya is "makin' the world safe for democracy" - so why does he need 10,000 armed guards?
posted by Wally
8:10 AM

That's not a typo. In spite of his 7 year effort to promote peace and stability and spread freedom to the region, the level of success of his efforts, and the size of his balls can be deduced from the preparations being made for his 2 day visit to Israel. It's an inverse relationship, obviously - massive failure and massive cowardice on Dubya's part require massive mobilization to protect him from such hazards as assassins and reality.
Israeli officials in Jerusalem are to deploy more than 10,000 police officers in a vast security operation ahead of the arrival this week of George Bush, the first US president to visit in a decade. Graffiti are being cleaned off walls, road markings are being repainted and hundreds of American flags are being put up across the city. The floodlights which illuminate the stone ramparts of the Old City will stay on for an extra two hours every night, until 2am, to give the president the chance to catch the view.

Bush, who arrives on Wednesday for his first visit as president, will stay at the King David hotel. Eight truckloads of equipment have already arrived in advance of his two-night stay. All the hotel's rooms will be taken by his entourage - tourists have had their bookings cancelled.

The security precautions, dubbed Operation Clear Skies by the Israeli security services, are immense. Roads around the hotel will be blocked, despite the huge traffic jams that will entail. A force of 10,500 police and security staff will be deployed and Bush will be flown in to the hotel by helicopter from the airport near Tel Aviv. "There will be so much security nobody will be able to get anywhere near the president," said Micky Rosenfield, Israel's police spokesman.
Overprotected spoiled brat
What is the expected outcome of Dubya's Middle East visit? While he is still talking about "transforming the Middle East through democratic reform", his host nations are talking about who's next - waiting for an adult to replace the boy-king next year.
The official Arab view of Bush was summed up inadvertently by a diplomat from a major Arab state, who indicated disbelief that Bush is to use the trip to renew his drive for Middle East democracy.

"Is that still on?" the Arab official asked. He spoke on condition of anonymity because of diplomatic sensitivities.

Nonetheless, Bush appears unlikely to alter his rhetoric during the trip, which is scheduled to take him to Israel, the Palestinian territories and five Arab countries -- Kuwait, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
Of course he's not going to alter his rhetoric. That would probably involve "reading", and he would have to memorize new words and soundbites after spending all this time memorizing the 3 or 4 he already knows.
Meanwhile, Al Qaeda's U.S.-born spokesman urged fighters to meet Bush with bombs when he visits the Middle East, according to a new video posted Sunday on the Internet.

Bush spokesman Gordon Johndroe said the threats won't alter the president's travel plans.
Master of low expectations
Of course not. With 10,500 armed guards defending his specially built cocoon, why should he alter his plans? Besides, with a mobilization that big, his plans aren't really "his" at all. Bush is just along for the ride - doing what his handlers tell him to do and smiling and waving at the cameras, just like he's been doing since he was governor of Texas.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:51 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya slipping out of the Oval Office.

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Crazy Grandpa McCain
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:46 AM

Say goodbye to your presidential run:

McCain: I would have started Iraq war regardless of WMD


According to presidential candidate John McCain, only the handling of the Iraq war was a mistake -- not the war itself.

"It's not American presence that bothers the American people, it's American causalities," said McCain in an interview with Tim Russert on NBC's "Meet The Press" on Sunday.

The validity of this conjecture is questionable, as fifty-nine percent of Americans say the U.S. should "stick to a withdrawal timetable." But McCain said in a recent New Hampshire debate -- and reasserted as much on Sunday -- that as long as Americans aren't dying, he sees nothing wrong with US troops staying as many as 100 years in Iraq.

"What I believe we can achieve is a reduction in casualties to the point where the Iraqis are doing the fighting and dying [and] we're supporting them," McCain said.

DipShit

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, January 6, 2008
Edmonds Speaks
posted by Clyde
6:55 AM

For sale: West's deadly nuclear secrets

A WHISTLEBLOWER has made a series of extraordinary claims about how corrupt government officials allowed Pakistan and other states to steal nuclear weapons secrets.

Sibel Edmonds, a 37-year-old former Turkish language translator for the FBI, listened into hundreds of sensitive intercepted conversations while based at the agency's Washington field office.

She approached The Sunday Times last month after reading about an Al-Qaeda terrorist who had revealed his role in training some of the 9/11 hijackers while he was in Turkey.

Edmonds described how foreign intelligence agents had enlisted the support of US officials to acquire a network of moles in sensitive military and nuclear institutions.

(Treason)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Fox Renews Lease on Henhouse
posted by Clyde
6:16 AM

President to appoint Stickler acting MSHA head

Richard Stickler is still running the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), but his job title sounds a little less secure.

President Bush announced Friday his intent to designate Stickler as the "acting" assistant secretary of labor over MSHA, four days after the expiration of Stickler's recess appointment as the temporary agency boss.

"I'd like to thank the president for his designation today, which will allow us to continue our progress on completing the implementation of Congress' safety improvements,'' Stickler said.

(Snip)

Those criticisms intensified during and after August's Crandall Canyon mine disaster, when nine Utah miners died in a pair of violent implosions of the mine's walls. The soft-spoken Stickler seemed to retreat into the background as mine operator and co-owner Robert Murray made disputable statements about the disaster's cause and conducted a failed rescue operation that included taking members of the news media underground.

(Un-freaking-believable)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, January 5, 2008
Well that didn't take long!
posted by Clyde
4:50 AM

Remember when Helmet Head said he wasn't leaving the Senate 5 years early so he could cash in as a lobbyist?

Lott and Breaux Open Bipartisan Lobbying Firm
Former Senators Say They Will Confront the Gridlock That Grips Congress

Former senators John Breaux (D-La.) and Trent Lott (R-Miss.) are opening a new, all-in-the-family lobbying firm, saying the capital and its corporate suitors are "yearning" for bipartisan solutions to gridlock.

Revealing what had been one of the worst-kept secrets in town, the senators said in an interview that they would officially launch the Breaux-Lott Leadership Group next week, with both their sons and Lott's former top aide joining them.

Breaux and Lott, who together have more than 70 years of experience in the House and Senate, first talked about such a partnership decades ago when they lived across the street from one another in Annandale. The families remain very close, with Chet Lott and John Breaux Jr. serving as groomsmen in each other's weddings.

The professional marriage had been assumed a foregone conclusion among K Street insiders since Lott announced Nov. 26 that he was retiring from the Senate less than a year after starting a six-year term. Days later, Breaux announced he was leaving the large lobbying firm Patton Boggs to form his own small shop.

(Link)

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

The Solution to every problem?
posted by Clyde
4:42 AM

Administration Considering Tax Cuts

The Bush administration, faced with a deteriorating economy and a big jump in unemployment, said Friday it was considering an economic stimulus package that might include tax cuts to ward off a recession.

On Friday, the Labor Department reported that unemployment was at a two-year high of 5 percent in December, while employers clamped down on hiring for the month. The amount of new jobs employers added to their payrolls was at a four-year low.

Officials stressed that President Bush has not decided yet to offer a proposal but was looking at a variety of options with a plan possibly being unveiled around the time of his Jan. 28 State of the Union address.

"The president is always looking at options ... always talking to people and looking at data," Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez said in an interview with The Associated Press.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, January 4, 2008
"A noun, a verb, and 9/11."
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:14 PM

For the love of God and all that is holy, will you please stop with the 9/11 references! Jeezus!

Giuliani positive despite weak campaign

He flatlined in Iowa and he's struggling in New Hampshire, but Rudy Giuliani shook off the early-state blues Thursday as only he can.

"None of this worries me - Sept. 11, there were times I was worried," Giuliani said.

"We're sitting in a pretty good position right now. So we're not worried and not concerned," he told a news conference here. "Maybe other people acted nervous in a situation like this, but this is not unexpected."

Drag Queen

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Trickle down my azz!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
11:10 AM

Jobless Rate Hits 5 Percent, 2-Year High

Hiring practically stalled in December, driving the nation's unemployment rate up to a two-year high of 5 percent and fanning fears of a recession.

Employers last month added the fewest new jobs to their payrolls in more than four years, according to the employment report released Friday by the Labor Department. The report showed that employment conditions are deteriorating, strained by a housing slump and credit crunch that are sapping economic strength.

"The economy is getting hit by some body blows. The big question is whether the economy can withstand it or will it take a fall," said Ken Mayland, president of ClearView Economics.

The unemployment rate jumped from 4.7 percent in November to 5 percent in December, the highest since November 2005 after the Gulf Coast hurricanes dealt the country a mighty blow. Total payrolls - both private employers and government - grew by just 18,000 last month, the worst showing since August 2003, when the economy suffered job losses as it struggled to recover from the 2001 recession.

Party like it's 1929


Flashback - December 17th, 2007: Bush says economy is sound

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Iowa: More importantly....
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
11:02 AM

Did anyone notice how g-damn white Chuck Norris' teeth were? Or his loony plastic wife?


Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

2008 landslide?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:38 AM

From Group News Blog:

Total Voter Turnout (approximate)

356,000

Percentage of total vote

24.5% Obama
20.5% Edwards
19.8% Clinton
11.4% Huckabee (R)

Ruh roh republicans!

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Barack you like a hurricane
posted by Wally
12:40 AM

Obama turns back Clinton to win Iowa caucuses

DES MOINES, Iowa - Sen. Barack Obama, bidding to be the first black president in American history, won the Iowa caucuses Thursday night, pushing Sen. Hillary Clinton back to third place in the opening test of the race for the Democratic presidential nomination.

On the Republican side, Mike Huckabee rode a wave of support from evangelical Christians to victory over Mitt Romney.

Obama, 46, told a raucous victory rally his triumph showed that in "big cities and small towns, you came together to say, 'We are one nation, we are one people and our time for change has come.'"

Final Democratic returns showed the first-term lawmaker gaining 38 percent support. Former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina gained second, barely edging out Clinton, the former first lady.

Obama for Change; Huckabee for Jesusland


Results:

Dems:

1,781 of 1,781 districts reporting

Obama 37.58
Edwards 29.75
Clinton 29.47
Richardson 2.11
Biden 0.93
Uncommitted 0.14
Dodd 0.02

Cons:

1,546 of 1,781 districts reporting

Huckabee 34
Romney 25
Thomspon 13
McCain 13
Paul 10
Giuliani 3

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, January 3, 2008
Remember the days when you used to read about this happening in "other" countries?
posted by Wally
8:11 AM

This is supposed to be America. Land of the free, home of the brave. Let freedom ring. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. What the hell happened to all of that? What have we, as a nation, become, when federal officers feel justified in kicking down doors and storming into peoples' bedrooms at 5 am without so much as a warrant?
"They're armed agents showing up at 5 a.m., banging on doors, kicking them in, going into people's bedrooms, ripping covers off people in their beds, asking them questions when they're half asleep, and seizing them and taking them away," said Patrick Gennardo of Englewood, one of several area attorneys who have filed suits recently asking that such ICE practices be found unconstitutional. "These aren't fine lines between consent and storming in; these are scary, major violations of the Constitution."

(snip)

"Immigration officials have every right to place people in deportation proceedings," said Bassina Farbenblum, an attorney with Seton Hall University's Center for Social Justice. "And if they're not entitled to stay in the United States, they should remove them. But there have to be constitutional limitations on the way in which immigration officials locate and arrest them."

"It's very dangerous to go down a path where we say the Constitution doesn't matter for a certain group of people," Farben-blum said. "This isn't a cowboy state."
It's disturbing enough to read about our soldiers doing this kind of thing to homes and families in Iraq, where it might somehow be justified in a twisted way. Now it's happening here, at home, and there can be no justification for it other than that we've become a police state. I guess that "fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here" shit didn't work out so well.

How long until the old Soviets are looking at us the same way we used to look at them? Or do they already?

Welcome to the USSA

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Conyers agrees, the DOJ shouldn't investigate itself
posted by Wally
8:00 AM

Conyers Demands that DOJ Appoint Real Special Counsel

In response to the Attorney General's announcement that he would be tasking the Assistant United States Attorney from the District of Connecticut to investigate matters involving the destruction of tapes of detainee interrogations, congressman John Conyers, Jr., Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, issued the following statement:
While I certainly agree that these matters warrant an immediate criminal investigation, it is disappointing that the Attorney General has stepped outside the Justice Department's own regulations and declined to appoint a more independent special counsel in this matter. Because of this action, the Congress and the American people will be denied - as they were in the Valerie Plame matter - any final report on the investigation.

Equally disappointing is the limited scope of this investigation, which appears limited to the destruction of two tapes. The government needs to scrutinize what other evidence may have been destroyed beyond the two tapes, as well as the underlying allegations of misconduct associated with the interrogations.

The Justice Department's record over the past seven years of sweeping the administration's misconduct under the rug has left the American public with little confidence in the administration's ability to investigate itself. Nothing less than a special counsel with a full investigative mandate will meet the tests of independence, transparency and completeness. Appointment of a special counsel will allow our nation to begin to restore our credibility and moral standing on these issues.
Thank you Rep. Conyers

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

The Financial Cost of the Bush Administration - $109,000 per American
posted by Wally
7:39 AM

What we as American taxpayers have suffered financially since Bush assumed office is 165% of what the debt was for the previous 200 years of the United States. When Bush took office the debt was $20 Trillion. It is now $53 Trillion.

In a report, "2007 Financial Report of the U. S. Government", released to the Public on the 17th of December 2007, David M. Walker, the Comptroller General of the United States and Head of the GAO, released a statement concerning the Long Term Accrued Debt of the United States. You can find this statement on Page 162 of the 182-page report.

As of September 30, 2007 the Long Term Accrued debt of the United States Government had grown to $53 Trillion dollars. When George Bush came into office the Long Term Debt stood at $20 Trillion.

This debt currently amounts to about $175,000 for every person alive in the United States. So, that means your long term debt has increased about $109,000 since Bush came into office. That figures to about $18,160 for each year he has been in office. And if you are a parent with two children, you and your wife are now obligated to an accrued debt of approximately $700,000 dollars.
Is that what the GOP means by fiscal conservative?

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, January 2, 2008
Justice Dept. to Open Criminal Probe in CIA's Destruction of Tapes
posted by Wally
2:40 PM

Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey announced today that the Justice Department will open a criminal investigation of the CIA's destruction of videotapes that showed harsh interrogation tactics of suspected terrorists.

"Following a preliminary inquiry into the destruction by CIA personnel of videotapes of detainee interrogations, the Department's National Security Division has recommended, and I have concluded, that there is a basis for initiating a criminal investigation of this matter," Mukasey said in a statement this afternoon.

The prosecutor who will head the investigation, John H. Durham, is the second-in-command at the U.S. attorney's office in Connecticut. He will serve as an acting U.S. attorney for the purposes of the probe, and will report to the deputy attorney general, Mukasey said. The post is currently held by acting Deputy Attorney General Craig Morford.

Durham is well-known in New England legal circles as a tough, publicity-averse prosecutor who has specialized in organized crime cases. Former attorney general Janet Reno named Durham as a special prosecutor to investigate allegations that FBI agents and police officers in Boston had ties to mafia informants. He is a registered Republican, according to Connecticut voter records.
While it looks good at first glance, the more you dig, the more it looks likely to be just more foot-dragging and obfuscation. Let Bush's Justice Dept. investigate their own misdeeds and decide if they did anything wrong. I wonder what the Vegas bookies are laying for odds on the DOJ finding anything they deem worth prosecuting. Meantime, they're laying cover and leading interference on anybody else doing their own investigation into the matter.

I'd like to think that it's a start, but I think it's a stall instead. I'd much rather see Congress appoint an independent special investigator to look into it. It was a good idea when the Republican led Congress hired Ken Starr to investigate Clinton's weener, and it's an even better idea now.

Criminals

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

$100 a barrel.
posted by Wally
2:04 PM

One year ago today, oil was 58 bucks a barrel. When Dubya took office in Jan 2001, it was $23 a barrel. Today it hit $100.
The price of oil surged past $100 per barrel for the first time Wednesday, the first trading day of the new year.

Several Mexican oil export ports were closed due to rough weather. And, unrest in Nigeria, a major oil producer, also spooked concerns about supply.

Further fueling the rally was a report that OPEC may not be able to meet its share of global oil demand by 2024.

Consumers are feeling the brunt of the spike at the pump too. Gas prices were up 0.6 cent Wednesday to a national average of $3.049 a gallon, according to AAA and the Oil Price Information Service.
Good job George

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

24,000
posted by Wally
8:30 AM

On September 11, 2001, 19 terrorists (none of Iraqi descent) killed nearly 3,000 people. In response, we shocked and awed Afghanistan (where al Qaeda was based) and Iraq (for still unexplained reasons.

The results? Osama bin Laden still hasn't been caught. We have found exactly zero WMD's or WMD making programs in Iraq. And we've won the hearts and minds of millions of Iraqi's by killing their friends and family members and destroying their homes and cities.
24,000 civilian Iraqi deaths in 2007

US-LED coalition and paramilitary forces in Iraq were responsible for some 24,000 violent civilian deaths in 2007, according to an independent group monitoring casualties in the war-ravaged country.

The Iraq Body Count (IBC) whose figures are tallied from media reports, morgue and hospital data, non-governmental and other sources, said in a report that there were between 22,586 and 24,159 violent civilian deaths in Iraq during the past year.

"For some 24,000 Iraqi civilians, and their families and friends, the year was one of devastating and irreparable tragedy," the IBC said.
Somebody remind me again, who are the real terrorists?

24,000

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:57 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya planting one on Ruth Pearl at a Hanukkah reception at the White House.


Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, January 1, 2008
Dookie, Wally and I wish you all a
posted by Clyde
8:59 AM


Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

NYTimes finally extracts head from ass!
posted by Clyde
8:49 AM

Looking at America

There are too many moments these days when we cannot recognize our country. Sunday was one of them, as we read the account in The Times of how men in some of the most trusted posts in the nation plotted to cover up the torture of prisoners by Central Intelligence Agency interrogators by destroying videotapes of their sickening behavior. It was impossible to see the founding principles of the greatest democracy in the contempt these men and their bosses showed for the Constitution, the rule of law and human decency.

It was not the first time in recent years we've felt this horror, this sorrowful sense of estrangement, not nearly. This sort of lawless behavior has become standard practice since Sept. 11, 2001.

The country and much of the world was rightly and profoundly frightened by the single-minded hatred and ingenuity displayed by this new enemy. But there is no excuse for how President Bush and his advisers panicked - how they forgot that it is their responsibility to protect American lives and American ideals, that there really is no safety for Americans or their country when those ideals are sacrificed.

Out of panic and ideology, President Bush squandered America's position of moral and political leadership, swept aside international institutions and treaties, sullied America's global image, and trampled on the constitutional pillars that have supported our democracy through the most terrifying and challenging times. These policies have fed the world's anger and alienation and have not made any of us safer.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Cheney urges invasion
posted by Clyde
8:32 AM

Oil in North Dakota Brings Job Boom and Burdens

At dawn, people from faraway states huddle outside the Mountrail County courthouse here, the coldest ones leaving briefcases and books to secure their spots for the moment it opens.

It is a peculiar sight in Stanley, population roughly 1,200, one in a constellation of isolated and, in some cases, shrinking farm towns along North Dakota's wide open western edge where few residents recall a traffic jam.

The early morning line hints at the sudden fortune that has arrived: Oil companies, saying that they located what may prove to be one of the largest recent oil finds in the United States, have begun drilling all through these parts. Fifty-two drilling rigs were at work in the state at the end of December; a count taken in October showed that 198 new wells had been drilled in a year, state officials said.

At the courthouse, the crush of people, known as landmen in the world of oil, spend their days scouring enormous old binders of deeds, each trying to sort out who owns the mineral rights to land that once seemed valuable mainly for growing durum wheat or peas.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

 

 

 Headlines & Comments

 
 True! by Daryl Cagle

See more TRUE cartoons by Daryl Cagle
 

Kansas City's own...
dubyaD40.com

Site Meter