|
Air
America Radio |
 |
|
|
|
|
Head-On
Radio Network |
 |
|
|
|
|
Search
dubyaD40.com |
 |
|
|
|
|
Ads by
The Google |
 |
|
|
|
Take
Action |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recent
Posts |
 |
|
|
|
|
Archives |
 |
|
|
|
|
Today's
Reason To Drink |
 |
|
|
|
|
Want to
link to us? |
 |
It's easy to do. Right click on the image
below and choose "Copy." Then paste it on
your site.

|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Today's
Topics |
 |
| |
|
Monday, December 31, 2007
|
Why does Dubya hate the troops?
posted by
Wally
7:52 AM
After all the crap he gave Congress for not getting him a bill to fund the military, and after all the caving in to him the Democrats did to make it palatable enough for him to sign (i.e. giving him every freaking thing he asked for and then some), the sonofabitch is going to veto it anyway. For months, President George W. Bush harangued Democrats in Congress for not moving quickly enough to support U.S. troops and for bogging down military bills with unrelated issues.
And then on Friday, with no warning, a vacationing Bush announced that he would veto a sweeping military policy bill because of an obscure provision that could expose the new Iraqi government to billions of dollars in legal claims dating to Saddam Hussein's rule.
The decision left the Bush administration scrambling to promise that it would work with Congress quickly in January to restore dozens of new military and veterans' programs. Those included an added pay raise for service members, which would have taken effect on Tuesday, and improvements in veterans' health benefits, which few elected officials on either side want to be seen opposing.
Bush's veto surprised and infuriated Democratic lawmakers and even some Republicans, who complained that the White House had failed to raise its concerns earlier. John Kerry summed it up best, saying "Only George Bush could be for supporting the troops before he was against it."
Flip Flop
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:24 AM
Use the "post a comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya and Barney

Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
|
Sunday, December 30, 2007
|
Bin Laden Studios' New Release - Just in time for Bush Doctrine of perpetual war
posted by
Clyde
7:47 AM
Bin Laden warns Iraq Sunnis not to fight
Osama bin Laden warned Iraq's Sunni Arabs against fighting al-Qaida and vowed to expand the terror group's holy war to Israel in a new audiotape Saturday, threatening "blood for blood, destruction for destruction."
Most of the 56-minute tape dealt with Iraq, apparently al-Qaida's latest attempt to keep supporters in Iraq unified at a time when the U.S. military claims to have al-Qaida's Iraq branch on the run.
The tape did not mention Pakistan or the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, though Pakistan's government has blamed al-Qaida and the Taliban for her death on Thursday. That suggested the tape was made before the assassination.
Bin Laden's comments offered an unusually direct attack on Israel, stepping up al-Qaida's attempts to use the Israeli-Arab conflict to rally supporters. Israel has warned of growing al-Qaida activity in Palestinian territory, though terror network is not believed to have taken a strong role there so far.
(Rated PG)
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
The ebb and flow of occupation
posted by
Clyde
7:35 AM
Iraq suicide attacks on the rise
Although overall violence in Iraq has dropped to levels not seen on a sustained basis since the summer of 2005, suicide bombings appear to be making a comeback, according to figures released Saturday by the top U.S. commander in Iraq.
Responsibility for such attacks typically is claimed by the Sunni militant group Al Qaeda in Iraq, which Gen. David H. Petraeus said remained the greatest threat in the country.
Underscoring the threat posed by the group, the U.S. military announced the discovery of three bodies at a site north of Baghdad that a resident said contained a mass grave.
The discovery Friday about eight miles northwest of Baqubah coincided with reports that Al Qaeda in Iraq had used a nearby shack to hold and torture kidnapped victims, said Lt. Col. Patrick Mackin, intelligence officer for the 4th Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division.
(Link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Saturday, December 29, 2007
|
Bush wants carrier group to intervene!
posted by
Clyde
6:34 AM
Vermont town seeks Bush, Cheney arrests
President Bush may soon have a new reason to avoid left-leaning Vermont: In one town, activists want him subject to arrest for war crimes.
A group in Brattleboro is petitioning to put an item on a town meeting agenda in March that would make Bush and Vice President Cheney subject to arrest and indictment if they visit the southeastern Vermont community.
"This petition is as radical as the Declaration of Independence, and it draws on that tradition in claiming a universal jurisdiction when governments fail to do what they're supposed to do," said Kurt Daims, 54, a retired machinist leading the drive.
As president, Bush has visited every state except Vermont.
(Link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
No Crony Left Behind
posted by
Clyde
5:52 AM
Bush to veto defense bill after Iraq objects
President George W. Bush intends to veto defense legislation after Iraq objected to a provision that could freeze its assets in the United States if Americans sue the country, the White House said on Friday.
Iraqi officials raised their concerns with U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker about 10 days ago and when administration officials took a closer look at the provision they agreed that it could pose "grave financial risk" for Iraq, tying up assets needed for reconstruction, the White House said.
Iraq also discussed with the United States the possibility of pulling its assets, about $20 billion to $30 billion, out of U.S. institutions if the defense policy bill became law, a senior administration official said on condition of anonymity.
"The new democratic government of Iraq, during this crucial period of reconstruction, cannot afford to have its funds entangled in such lawsuits in the United States," White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said.
(Link)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Friday, December 28, 2007
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:44 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya signing the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007.

Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
Bush readies his veto crayon
posted by
Clyde
7:00 AM
Protection for Endangered Whistle-Blowers
Congress is finally ready to stand up to the Bush administration and for those courageous federal workers who dare to reveal waste and abuse in government. The Senate has passed strong reforms to the 1989 whistle-blower protection law, counteracting the gag orders, retaliatory investigations and other harassments that have become shamefully standard practice during the last seven years.
The reforms would provide stronger outside review protection for whistle-blowers and would make it more difficult for their security clearances to be revoked, a common shunning device. Workers would also be freer to share classified information with Congress - when necessary to reveal the details of abuse and fraud - and would have a strengthened court review process for appealing disputed cases.
More than 400 workers a year make firsthand allegations of on-the-job waste and fraud, risking their careers in the process. In response, too many administration political appointees have flouted the law, demoting and demeaning workers who speak up, even subverting the inspector general system in the process.
The House has passed an even stronger version, and negotiators will begin meeting soon after Congress returns. The White House, predictably, is threatening a veto. Both chambers of Congress have registered a veto-proof commitment, and the next priority should be to steer the strongest possible final measure into law.
(Link)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
A Crisis of Conscience
posted by
Clyde
6:41 AM
Navy JAG Resigns Over Torture Issue
"It was with sadness that I signed my name this grey morning to a letter resigning my commission in the U.S. Navy," wrote Gig Harbor, Wash., resident and attorney-at-law Andrew Williams in a letter to The Peninsula Gateway last week. "There was a time when I served with pride ... Sadly, no more."
Williams' sadness stems from the recent CIA videotape scandal in which tapes showing secret interrogations of two Al Qaeda operatives were destroyed.
The tapes may have contained evidence that the U.S. government used a type of torture known as waterboarding to obtain information from suspected terrorists.
Torture, including water-boarding, is prohibited under the treaties of the Geneva Convention.
(Link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Thursday, December 27, 2007
|
Bush: $70 Bil to blow things up in Iraq is necessary. But $10 Bil for infrastructure here in U.S. is wasteful.
posted by
Wally
9:07 AM
Bush signed a $555 Billion dollar spending bill on Wednesday, not noticing the hypocrisy involved in bitching about the 10 billion in earmarks put in by Congress (roughly equal parts Dem and Repub) to be spent here at home, after holding his breath and throwing a temper tantrum until he got 7 times that much for his ill-advised and miserably executed adventure in Iraq.
"I am disappointed in the way the Congress compiled this legislation, including abandoning the goal I set early this year to reduce the number and cost of earmarks by half," the president said in a statement. "Instead, the Congress dropped into the bill nearly 9,800 earmarks that total more than $10 billion. These projects are not funded through a merit-based process and provide a vehicle for wasteful government spending."
Bush, who had used his veto power to remain relevant in the debate with Democrats on national spending priorities, had agreed to sign the spending measure, which includes $70 billion for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, after winning concessions on Iraq and other budget items. The bill bankrolls 14 Cabinet departments and federal agencies and funds foreign aid for the budget year that began on Oct. 1. Fiscal conservatism my ass Aside from the pure hypocrisy of demanding 70 billion to literally "blow up" and then whining about how 10 billion is wasteful, let's look at the earmarks in this bill in historical perspective. When taking this stroll down memory lane, remember the "fiscal conservatives" who have been in charge of Congress since 1994, and the White House since 2000.

 Click the images above for more details thanks to Citizens Against Government Waste. You can also find more fun information like this to share with your friends and family at the CAGW website.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Their JFK:
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:13 AM
Sad. Will all hell break loose in Pakistan?
Pakistan's Bhutto assassinated

RAWALPINDI, Pakistan - Pakistan opposition leader Benazir Bhutto was assassinated Thursday in a suicide bombing that also killed at least 20 others at a campaign rally, a party aide and a military official said.
"At 6:16 p.m. she expired," said Wasif Ali Khan, a member of Bhutto's party who was at Rawalpindi General Hospital where she was taken after the attack.
"She has been martyred," added party official Rehman Malik. Bhutto was 54.
A party security adviser said Bhutto was shot in the neck and chest as she got into her vehicle, then the gunman blew himself up.
F Musharraf!
Permalink
::
5 comments
::
|
|
Terrorists' new mission: Protect President Bush
posted by
Wally
7:47 AM
No, that's not a headline from The Onion. The World Net Daily is a slightly more reputable news source than the Onion, although it is debatable how much more reputable. Most active West Bank militant group in security team for Middle East visit
JERUSALEM - Members of the most active West Bank terror organization are set to participate in security forces being deployed to protect President Bush during his visit to the Palestinian territories next month, WND has learned.
Bush is due in the region Jan. 9 as part of a follow-up to last month's U.S.-led Israeli-Palestinian Annapolis summit.
According to Israeli security officials coordinating deployments of forces with the PA for Bush's Ramallah visit, members of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, Fatah's declared military wing, have been called upon by the PA to participate in the protection of Bush's convoy and in securing the parameter during the meeting with Abbas.
The Brigades is listed as a terror organization by the U.S. State Department. The group took credit along with the Islamic Jihad terror organization for every suicide bombing in Israel between 2005 and 2006, and is responsible for thousands of shootings and rocket firings. Statistically, the Al Aqsa Brigades perpetuated more terrorism from the West Bank than Hamas, according to the Israeli Defense Forces. Draw your own conclusions. Personally, based on the breaking news that former Pakastan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto was killed this morning in a suicide bombing, and it looks like things are about to get very ugly in the middle east (even moreso than they already are) I can't see this turning out well.
It is interesting that Bush will suddenly find himself protected by the very people he has sworn to eliminate. It will speak volumes if he accepts them in their security role and suddenly calls them allies and friends. I wonder what Rush and falefel Bill will have to say about this.
Strange bedfellows
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
|
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
|
Will GOP Caging lead to GOP "caging"?
posted by
Wally
3:25 PM
Now that GOP Chair Kris Kobach has publicly admitted to illegal voter caging - in writing - will he be spending time visiting some of his GOP friends in the Graybar Hotel? Kobach admits to coordinated voter supression 
Earlier today Kris Kobach, chairman of the Kansas GOP, sent out a self-congratulatory litany of accomplishments. Among them was one particularly eye-catching item: To date, the Kansas GOP has identified and caged more voters in the last 11 months than the previous two years! We're going to move past the fact that any amount of voter identification would be more than the amount the GOP has done in the last two years, or four for that matter. The practice of caging is what caught out eye.
Caging is a particularly devious and underhanded method of purging likely Democratic voters from the pollbooks. It's also illegal. Blue Tide Rising has the story.
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Help Rep. Wexler put it back on the table
posted by
Wally
9:06 AM
Rep. Robert Wexler is taking on the Bush administration - in cyberspace.
The Florida Democrat has launched a Web site - wexlerwantshearings.com - and is gathering signatures calling for impeachment hearings against Vice President Dick Cheney.
"Our constitution mandates that the House of Representatives hold presidents and vice presidents accountable when they commit high crimes," Wexler says in a video on the site, which suggests, among other things, that Cheney manipulated intelligence to boost the case for war against Iraq and was involved in the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame.
Wexler, a veteran member of the House Judiciary Committee, hopes to deliver the signatures to the committee in January when Congress returns to Washington.
Read more Sign Wexler's petition
Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
Military vote go bye bye
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:08 AM
Military family members share public's division on Iraq war, Bush

Close family members of U.S. troops are split on whether the Iraq invasion was a mistake, and 55% disapprove of President Bush's job performance, according to USA TODAY/Gallup Polls focusing on immediate relatives of servicemembers.
"They've maxed out on the troops. You've got guys who are over there on their fourth or fifth tours. It's ridiculous," says Jeanette Knowles, 40, of Mountain Home, Idaho, whose brother, Jeff, served a tour in Iraq with the Oregon National Guard.
Knowles, who calls herself a Democratic-leaning moderate, says her disapproval of Bush stems from his handling of the war.
....
Among military families, 55% disapprove of Bush's performance compared with 64% of Americans without relatives in the service in the latest USA TODAY/Gallup Poll. Men in military families are more approving of Bush (47%) than female relatives (36%).
Yellow Ribbon
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:49 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption

Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
|
Tuesday, December 25, 2007
|
Happy Holidays!
posted by
Clyde
7:47 AM

Permalink
::
9 comments
::
|
|
The consequences of truth
posted by
Clyde
7:39 AM
War strain in Iraq may speed troop cuts
The strain of the war in Iraq is increasingly forcing senior Pentagon leaders to be blunter about the military's inability to sustain war operations indefinitely, a shift in tone that may mean more troops come home sooner.
The change comes as the security situation in Iraq looks much improved over even six months ago. It also comes under the leadership of Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who has welcomed candor from his commanders. As a result, senior leaders have taken advantage of the situation to make a more public case that the military, especially the Army, can no longer afford the luxury of sustained military operations in Iraq.
The Pentagon is already taking steps to draw down forces. Currently, there are about 165,000 American troops in Iraq, which includes about 20 combat brigades. By next summer, the plan is to return five combat brigades, or about 20,000 troops.
But a push is under way to bring home even more by the end of next year. Last Friday, Secretary Gates reiterated his hope that five additional combat brigades could be sent home by December 2008.
(Link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Just because he has no need for oxygen doesn't mean real people don't!
posted by
Clyde
7:23 AM
Cheney accused of blocking Californian bid to cut car fumes
The US vice-president, Dick Cheney, was behind a controversial decision to block California's attempt to impose tough emission limits on car manufacturers, according to insiders at the government Environmental Protection Agency.
Staff at the agency, which announced last week that California's proposed limits were redundant, said the agency's chief went against their expert advice after car executives met Cheney, and a Chrysler executive delivered a letter to the EPA saying why the state should not be allowed to regulate greenhouse gases.
EPA staff members told the Los Angeles Times that the agency's head, the Bush appointee Stephen Johnson, ignored their conclusions and shut himself off from consultation in the month before the announcement. He then informed them of his decision and instructed them to provide the legal rationale for it, they said.
"California met every criteria ... on the merits," an anonymous member of the EPA staff told the Times. "The same criteria we have used for the last 40 years ... We told him that. All the briefings we have given him laid out the facts."
(Link)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Monday, December 24, 2007
|
The Uniter strikes again
posted by
Wally
11:49 AM
First, Dubya managed to do something that had been thought impossible for centuries - uniting the Shias and Sunnis against the U.S. occupying force. Now he has taken the next step towards completing the unification of all Iraqis against us.
The Iraqi Kurds have been our only solid ally in Iraq, with us since the glorious "shock and awe" days - helping us "accomplish our mission" - whatever that mission might have been. Not for long. Not now that he has publicly hung them out to dry. Bush backs Turkish strikes on Kurdish rebels
US President George Bush has spoken with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip and gave his backing for military strikes by Ankara on Kurdish rebel rear bases in Iraq.
The two men hailed the cooperation in the battle against the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), which has seen Turkey launch air raids and a limited ground incursion into northern Iraq.
They agreed to continue sharing intelligence and again classed the PKK as a "common enemy", press agency Anatolia said. "Common enemy" huh? I'm sure our soldiers fighting side by side with them will disagree. At least until those weapons they've been providing to the Kurds are turned against them.
Good plan George
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:39 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Bush with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the Rose Garden.

Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
Let the smear begin!
posted by
Clyde
5:38 AM
CIA chief to drag White House into torture cover-up storm
THE CIA chief who ordered the destruction of secret videotapes recording the harsh interrogation of two top Al-Qaeda suspects has indicated he may seek immunity from prosecution in exchange for testifying before the House intelligence committee.
Jose Rodriguez, former head of the CIA's clandestine service, is determined not to become the fall guy in the controversy over the CIA's use of torture, according to intelligence sources.
It has emerged that at least four White House staff were approached for advice about the tapes, including David Addington, a senior aide to Dick Cheney, the vice-president, but none has admitted to recommending their destruction.
Vincent Cannistraro, former head of counterterrorism at the CIA, said it was impossible for Rodriguez to have acted on his own: "If everybody was against the decision, why in the world would Jose Rodriguez - one of the most cautious men I have ever met - have gone ahead and destroyed them?"
(Rut - Roh)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Cheney contemplates pork products over new Iranian development!
posted by
Clyde
5:25 AM
Iran Cited In Iraq's Decline in Violence Order From Tehran Reined In Militias, U.S. Official Says
The Iranian government has decided "at the most senior levels" to rein in the violent Shiite militias it supports in Iraq, a move reflected in a sharp decrease in sophisticated roadside bomb attacks over the past several months, according to the State Department's top official on Iraq.
Tehran's decision does not necessarily mean the flow of those weapons from Iran has stopped, but the decline in their use and in overall attacks "has to be attributed to an Iranian policy decision," David M. Satterfield, Iraq coordinator and senior adviser to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, said in an interview.
U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan C. Crocker said that the decision, "should [Tehran] choose to corroborate it in a direct fashion," would be "a good beginning" for a fourth round of talks between Crocker and his Iranian counterpart in Baghdad. Although the mid-December date scheduled for the talks was postponed, Crocker said he expects that the parties will convene "in the next couple of weeks."
The Pentagon has been more cautious in describing Iran's role in changes on the ground in Iraq. A Defense Department report released Wednesday emphasized that support for militia groups by Tehran's Shiite government remains "a significant impediment to progress." And Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said Friday that "the jury is out" on whether Iran is playing a less-destructive role.
(Curses!)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Sunday, December 23, 2007
|
"One man, one vote" - Fact or Fiction?
posted by
Clyde
6:50 AM
Now I know that they don't need to vote because they have already bought our government but, does anyone think we would have these laws if corporations could vote? Hell No!
Voter ID laws fuel debate ahead of primaries
Choosing a 2008 presidential candidate might be confusing enough, but some voters will face an additional challenge next year - remembering to bring the right identification to the polls.
In some states, voters will have to show a current, government-issued photo ID. Other states want to impose the same requirement but are waiting on a Supreme Court ruling before moving ahead.
The court is expected to rule next year on the constitutionality of an Indiana law requiring voters to show a photo ID - like a driver's license - issued by a state or federal agency. If it lets the law stand, other states could adopt similar measures, election experts say.
"I don't think Indiana will be the last by any stretch," said Tim Vercellotti, an assistant professor at the Eagleton Institute of Politics at Rutgers University.
(Link)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
The occupation of two countries can be such a bother!
posted by
Clyde
6:34 AM
No troop 'surge' for Afghanistan
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates ruled out a large "surge" of U.S. forces in Afghanistan but said Friday that a small number of additional troops were needed to counter increasing violence and train Afghan forces.
"You're talking about probably somewhere in the neighborhood of 7,500 troops," Gates said. "So it's not like moving 100,000 troops from one place to the other or something like that."
Commanders in Afghanistan, seeking to augment the 26,000 U.S. troops in the country, have asked for 3,500 police trainers and about 3,000 combat troops in addition to more helicopters and pilots and some smaller units.
Gates has been pressuring Washington's North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies for more troops for the Afghan mission.
(Osama Bin Forgotten)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Saturday, December 22, 2007
|
Big Brother gets a woody!
posted by
Clyde
7:15 AM
FBI Prepares Vast Database Of Biometrics $1 Billion Project to Include Images of Irises and Faces
The FBI is embarking on a $1 billion effort to build the world's largest computer database of peoples' physical characteristics, a project that would give the government unprecedented abilities to identify individuals in the United States and abroad.
Digital images of faces, fingerprints and palm patterns are already flowing into FBI systems in a climate-controlled, secure basement here. Next month, the FBI intends to award a 10-year contract that would significantly expand the amount and kinds of biometric information it receives. And in the coming years, law enforcement authorities around the world will be able to rely on iris patterns, face-shape data, scars and perhaps even the unique ways people walk and talk, to solve crimes and identify criminals and terrorists. The FBI will also retain, upon request by employers, the fingerprints of employees who have undergone criminal background checks so the employers can be notified if employees have brushes with the law.
"Bigger. Faster. Better. That's the bottom line," said Thomas E. Bush III, assistant director of the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services Division, which operates the database from its headquarters in the Appalachian foothills.
The increasing use of biometrics for identification is raising questions about the ability of Americans to avoid unwanted scrutiny. It is drawing criticism from those who worry that people's bodies will become de facto national identification cards. Critics say that such government initiatives should not proceed without proof that the technology really can pick a criminal out of a crowd.
(Peek-a-Boo)
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Merry Christmas for... Some!
posted by
Clyde
7:08 AM
Bonuses on Wall Street surge 14 percent
This might have been one of Wall Street's most dismal years in a decade, but that hasn't stopped bonus checks from rising an average of 14 percent.
Four of the biggest U.S. investment banks - Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Bear Stearns Cos. - will pay out about $49.6 billion in compensation this year. Of that, bonuses are traditionally estimated to represent 60 percent, or almost $30 billion.
But that might not sit well with investors who held on to investment bank stocks this year - and watched them plunge by up to 45 percent. Investment houses have been slammed by the credit crisis, and top executives this past week said they've yet to see a bottom.
Further, some of those executives have even agreed to forgo their bonuses this year to reflect the poor performance. Morgan Stanley CEO John Mack and Bear Stearns CEO Jimmy Cayne won't be collecting their payouts.
(Bah Humbug)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Friday, December 21, 2007
|
Iowa for John?
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:06 PM
Democrat Edwards looks to pull a surprise in Iowa
While all eyes are on the heavyweight Democratic bout in Iowa between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, a revamped John Edwards is looking to steal the presidential campaign's first big prize.
Edwards, the former North Carolina senator, has eased off his attacks on rivals, dusted off the populist rhetoric of his 2004 race and primed his campaign for the sort of late charge that carried him to a strong second-place finish in Iowa four years ago.
Edwards probably needs a win or a strong second to stay in the race. Either would dramatically reshape a Democratic contest dominated for months by the showdown between Clinton, a New York senator, and Obama, an Illinois senator.
"When the caucus-goers in Iowa rise up, there is going to be a wave across America that absolutely nobody can stop," Edwards said at a recent rally in Des Moines.
Go John!
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Glad he's on our side
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:57 AM
Colbert chosen AP Celebrity of the Year

Colbert failed to get onto the primary ballot in his home state of South Carolina, dooming his hopes for the White House. And his show went 0-for-4 at the Emmy Awards, including an especially painful loss to Barry Manilow.
But Colbert did win one honor: He was voted AP Celebrity of the Year by newspaper editors and broadcast producers who said Colbert had the biggest impact on pop culture in 2007.
.....
"In receiving this award, I am pleased that I was chosen over two great spinners of fantasy - J.K. Rowling and Al Gore. It is truly an honor to be named the Associated Press' Celebrity of the Year. Best of all, this makes me the official front-runner for next year's Drug-Fueled Downward Spiral of the year. P.S. Look for my baby bump this spring!"
Congrats Stephen!
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Politics Trumps Science Again
posted by
Wally
8:55 AM
Quick poll: raise your hand if you're surprised that Bush sided with big automotive makers and oil companies and against the environment and "states' rights" when he rejected California's request to raise fuel economy standards in the state. All you people with your hands raised, you've either been asleep for 7 years, or you're stupid.
The fact that he sided with multi-national mega-corporate profits and against creatures with lungs was expected. The fact that his hand-picked crony that heads up the EPA outright rejected and ignored the scientific and legal findings presented to him by his staff was... well, really, that was expected too. "Science" and "facts" have no place in Bush's reality. EPA administrator Stephen L. Johnson announced Wednesday that because President Bush had signed an energy bill raising average fuel economy that there was no need or justification for separate state regulation. He also said that California's request did not meet the legal standard set out in the Clean Air Act.
But his staff, which had worked for months on the waiver decision, concluded just the opposite, the sources said Thursday. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk with the media or because they feared reprisals.
California Air Resources Board Chairwoman Mary Nichols said....Johnson's decision showed "that this administration ignores the science and ignores the law to reach the politically convenient conclusion."
Some staff members believe Johnson made his decision after auto executives met with Vice President Dick Cheney and after a Chrysler executive delivered a letter to the White House outlining why neither California nor the EPA should be allowed to regulate greenhouse gases, among other reasons. The Detroit News reported Wednesday that chief executives of Ford and Chrysler met with Cheney last month. So much for all that "Of the People, By the People, For the People" crap. That's been changed to "Of the Corporation, By the Corporation, For the Corporation".
We The People are screwed
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
GOP wins elections the old fashioned way. They steal them.
posted by
Wally
8:01 AM
Justice Department intentionally delayed prosecuting GOP official for jamming Democrats' phones until after the 2004 election.
The Justice Department delayed prosecuting a key Republican official for jamming the phones of New Hampshire Democrats until after the 2004 election.
An official with detailed knowledge of the investigation into the 2002 Election Day scheme said the inquiry sputtered for months after a prosecutor sought approval to indict James Tobin, the Northeast regional coordinator for the Republican National Committee.
(snip)
A Manchester, N.H., policeman had quickly traced the jamming to Republican political operatives in 2003 and forwarded the evidence to the Justice Department for what ordinarily would be a straightforward case.
However, senior Justice Department officials slowed the inquiry, the official told McClatchy Newspapers. The official didn't know whether top department officials ordered the delays or what motivated those decisions. The GOP can't stand a level playing field. Thus all the whining about how rich white christian males are being oppressed and abused. About how there's a "war on Christmas". About the (ahem) "liberal" media. By constantly bitching about how unfair it is for them to have to play fair, they've managed to convince nearly 30% of the people to believe them. Since the other 70% are onto their game, there's only one way Republicans can win.
Cheating
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:26 AM
Use the "post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya struggling through a news conference Thursday Dec. 20.

Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
|
Thursday, December 20, 2007
|
A Yuletide Clyde's Corner
posted by
Clyde
1:13 PM
THE "REAL" NIGHT BEFORE CHRISTMAS
'Twas the night before Christmas, and across the land Look out! It's Matthews' hormonal gland;
At Greta and Rita we were forced to stare, Of Natalee's plight, they nightly, did air;
There's a War on Christmas O'Reilly has said, With portions of hummus and flatbread he uses in bed;
There's Sean in his jackboots and Ingraham in his lap, Poor Alan Colmes, still comes off as a sap,
In studios, at once they all did chatter, They call this debate, is there anything sadder?
With fury and spittle their teeth did gnash, Forget principles, they're in it for cash.
Of Cheney and Bush the scandals did grow When asked to report, they said "Oh Hell No!",
With Paris or Britney there's no need for fear, There's time for real news, sometime next year,
For now it's the story of the pretty white chick, and there's always the story of Falcon Mike Vick.
The studios are different,, but the talk is the same, They bristled, and shouted, and called them by name;
"Now, Kristol! now, Gibson! now, King and Blitzer! On, Beck! on Grace! on, Scarborough and Tucker!
With viewers and ratings your numbers did fall! Can't you tell by now, that we loathe you all?"
On issues of import, the people did try, yet busy were you, with the airport bathroom guy.
Defense of Limbaugh, of course they flew, Like Delay, Rove and Libby too.
Attacked Kerry and Durbin, for their verbal goof Yet with Savage and Coulter, they remained aloof.
Doocy and Kilmeade, the alarm they did sound, Of Obama's "real" faith, they thought was found.
Wrapped in the flag from head to foot, While victims of Katrina still clad in ashes and soot;
Likes wolves in forest, they travel in pack, Ready to stab a Democrat, right in the back.
Bush lies - go unchallenged! Cheney's crimes how many? The story of Terri, was better than any!
Lou Dobbs and Cavuto are having a row, It's the fault of the immigrants or didn't you know?
Republican talking points, is what they bequeath, The Democrats outnumbered, three too one seat;
Their arguments are foul and smelly, Serves as the fare, upon radio and telly.
Put the war and its death upon the shelf, Instead, let's talk, some more about that Teacher Milf;
No mention of soldiers, shot in the head, Would much rather blame Liberals, for it instead;
The truth not needed, for this type of work, If spoken on air, is removed with a jerk,
The lies into war, must lay in repose, for it's time for commercial, this segment is closed;
Free speech for all, is from the constitution they say, But only as long, as it is said their way.
The show is over and the host says good-night, as he flips you off, upon dimming the light!
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
"Do-nothing Congress"? Here's why.
posted by
Wally
8:43 AM
Over the holidays, when you're trapped at the dinner table listening to your Republican Bush-league brother-in-law whining about how the Democrats haven't done anything since they've been in control of Congress, here's a couple terms to drop to turn the tables: "Up or down vote". "Nuclear option". Haven't heard either of those very much since the Republicans have been relegated to the minority, have we? How about this one: "Obstructionism".
Not only have they done a 180 degree flip-flop on the topic of obstructing any legislation that they don't like by filibustering it, they have taken it to unprecedented levels and turned it from an art form into a habit, and then to an addiction. The GOP in the 110th Congress has set the record for the most filibusters ever in the history of Congress.
New Report Shows How Conservative Minority Rules by Filibuster, Preventing Up or Down Vote on a Record Number of Bills
The Republican Senate minority today filibustered an omnibus budget bill, setting a modern-day record for blocking the most legislation during a congressional session. A new report released today by the Campaign for America's Future details the 62 times conservatives have used the filibuster to block legislation (or force modification of bills) in the first session of the 110th Congress. In just the first year of this two-year Congress, their use of the filibuster in the Senate topped the previous record, reached during the entire 107th Congress.
"In just one session, a minority in Congress has prevented a mind-blowing 62 pieces of legislation from going to the floor for an up or down vote," said Campaign for America's Future co-director Roger Hickey. "Our report shows how over and over again, the uncompromising minority has thwarted the will of majorities in Congress and of the American people, holding the Senate floor hostage to a radical right-wing agenda."
Sixty votes are needed to invoke cloture and end a filibuster. The 62nd cloture vote of the session is more than any single session of Congress since at least 1973, the earliest year cloture votes are available online from the Senate. Republicans are on pace to force 134 cloture votes to cut off a filibuster, according to the Campaign for America's Future analysis, more than double the historical average of the last 35 years. 
Even pieces of legislation that have made it past the Senate filibuster blockade have been obstructed by President Bush. Last week the President vetoed for the second time a popular bill that would expand health coverage for 10 million American children. According to the Campaign for America's Future report, Bush has threatened to veto 84 bills and has vetoed six as of December 17. In contrast, during the period when the Republicans were in the congressional majority, Bush went the longest time without vetoing a bill since President Arthur Garfield. You can read the full report at The Campaign for America's Future (CAF) (.pdf format)
For those of you keeping score at home, that comes to about one Republican filibuster for every two days that Congress was in session. But unlike when the Democrats were in the minority and every hint at a filibuster was reason for front page outrage and talking head invective, you'll never read about this in the newspaper headlines or hear it on the nightly news.
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
This is how much Bush/Cheney administration cares about the law
posted by
Wally
8:02 AM
I wonder what page of the KBR / Halliburton handbook these instructions are on, and did Dick Cheney put them there himself when he was CEO? - Step 1) Drug a young attractive American woman and gang rape her vaginally and anally
- Step 2) Lock her in a trailer under armed guards with no food and water for 24 hours so she can't talk to anybody about it.
- Step 3) Destroy evidence of the crime
- Step 4) 2 years later, after failing to investigate, don't even bother to show up to testify at Congressional hearings
It sounds like something out of a far-fetched mystery/crime novel. Unfortunately for the woman involved (and the other women who have since come forward with similar allegations), it's all too real. Appearing before a hearing on the enforcement of laws to protect Americans working in Iraq, Ms Jones said that on her fourth day in Baghdad some co-workers, who she described as Halliburton-KBR firefighters, invited her for a drink. "I took two sips from the drink and don't remember anything after that," she said.
The next morning she woke up groggy and confused, and with a sore chest and blood between her legs. She reported the incident to KBR and was examined by an army doctor, who said she had been repeatedly raped vaginally and anally.
"The KBR security took me to a trailer and then locked me in a room with two armed guards outside my door," Ms Jones said. "I was imprisoned in the trailer for approximately a day. One of the guards finally had mercy and let me use a phone."
An army doctor collected DNA evidence, including vaginal swabs and scrapings from her fingernails, and placed them in a box for evidence. Ms Jones said the doctor gave the box to a KBR security officer but it went missing. A State Department diplomatic security agent recovered the kit in May 2007, but the doctor's notes and photographs are now inexplicably missing, undermining any chances of bringing the case through the criminal courts. Destruction of evidence at Cheney's old company? Get out. Now, more than 2 years and no investigation and no charges pressed against the men who raped her, the Dept of Justice - you know, the agency charged with "upholding the law" - didn't even bother to show up at the Congressional hearing on the matter. The Department of Justice refused to send a representative to answer questions from Congress today on the investigations into allegations of rape and sexual assault on female American contractors.
"I'm embarrassed that the Department of Justice can't even come forward," said the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee John Conyers, D-Mich.
"This is an absolute disgrace," said Conyers. "The least we could do is have people from the Department of Justice and the Defense over here talking about how we're going to straighten out the system right away."
"The Department of Justice has not informed Jamie or me of the status of a criminal investigation against her rapist if any investigation exists," Poe said today. "It is interesting to note that the Department of Justice has thousands of lawyers but not one from the barrage of lawyers is here to tell us what if anything they are doing. Their absence and silence speaks volumes about the hidden crimes in Iraq. Their attitude seems to be one of blissful indifference to American workers in Iraq," said Poe. Speaks volumes just like all the missing evidence, the lack of oversight, and the failure to bother investigating a heinous crime. It's not speaking, it's SHOUTING. And what it's shouting is guilt.
Remember, this is Cheney's old company. He was CEO, and he still holds hundreds of thousands of shares. What does he have to say about all this? You know he'd have plenty to say if it was Clinton's old company, or Gore, or Edwards. That's all we'd hear day and night from Cheney and Bush and the vulgar pigboy and falafel Bill and Hannity and.... Let's hear from old Darth. What's up with your old company Dick? You were CEO. Tell us WTF is going on over there.
Or was that "trailer" they locked her up in actually one of Cheney's secret bunkers, in the hopes that he could get a crack at her too?
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Wacko
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:34 AM
Paul keeps white supremacist donation

Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul has received a $500 campaign donation from a white supremacist, and the Texas congressman doesn't plan to return it, an aide said Wednesday.
Don Black, of West Palm Beach, recently made the donation, according to campaign filings. He runs a Web site called Stormfront with the motto, "White Pride World Wide." The site welcomes postings to the "Stormfront White Nationalist Community."
"Dr. Paul stands for freedom, peace, prosperity and inalienable rights. If someone with small ideologies happens to contribute money to Ron, thinking he can influence Ron in any way, he's wasted his money," Paul spokesman Jesse Benton said. "Ron is going to take the money and try to spread the message of freedom."
"And that's $500 less that this guy has to do whatever it is that he does," Benton added.
Cuckoo bananas
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
As if anyone in Bush's administration cares about a subpoena
posted by
Wally
7:27 AM
Congress is preparing subpoenas for several CIA officials to force them to testify about the destruction of the torture enhanced interrogation technique videotapes. If the history of this administration is any indication, Bush's boys in the CIA are laughing about it, drinking beers, lighting cigars with the documents they're burning, and practicing keeping a straight face while saying "I don't recall".The chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, directed the Committee to prepare subpoenas to seek testimony about the CIA destroying the interrogation tapes of two al Qaeda operatives.
According to an aide to Rep. Reyes some subpoenas have already been completed. The subpoenas include requests for Acting General Counsel John Rizzo and former CIA Operations Chief Jose Rodriguez to testify before the Committee.
The subpoenas also include requests for documents relating to the tape's destruction. According to an aide to Rep. Reyes, CIA staff met with the Committee yesterday and were shown copies of the subpoenas.
In a joint letter to the House Intelligence Committee last week, the Justice Department and the CIA asked that the Committee ease the pace of their investigation. "We fully appreciate the committee's oversight interest in this matter but want to advise you of our concerns that action responsive to your requests would present significant risks to our preliminary inquiry." Translation: "Shut your pie hole and leave us alone while we us take our time and 'investigate' ourselves and decide if we did anything wrong. We need time to find all the incriminating evidence against us and destroy it before even thinking of testifying before Congress."
But now Congress can stand there and pretend that they're taking strong action while they're being mocked and having their self-imposed powerlessness rubbed in their faces. The next question is, what will Congress do about it when Bush and his boys flagrantly defy them and their subpoenas yet again? Will they do anything this time, or just wring their hands and let them get away with it again?
Thugs -vs- wimps
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
|
More document destruction?
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
11:01 AM
Fire out at building next to White House

Firefighters quickly doused a two-alarm fire Wednesday in the historic Eisenhower Executive Office Building, which houses the vice president's ceremonial offices and the majority of the White House staff.
Firefighting crews used axes to break windows on the third floor of the ornate building shortly after the two-alarm blaze broke out after 9 a.m.
The fire started near the vice presidential offices, CNN's Kathleen Koch reported.
Vice President Dick Cheney's working offices are in the West Wing of the White House, where he was at the time of the fire.
What are they hiding?
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Colorado Sec.of State Calls for Fair Elections in .08
posted by
Wally
10:58 AM
The evidence is in. Electronic touch screen voting machines lose, fair elections win in Colorado. At least for now. Colorado's looming primary and presidential elections were thrown into turmoil Monday when many of the state's electronic voting machines were deemed unreliable and unsecure by Secretary of State Mike Coffman.
It is clear that Coffman's decision to "decertify" machines made by three of four manufacturers - Sequoia Voting System, Hart InterCivic and Election Systems and Software, or ES&S - will have far-reaching impact, Coffman and others said.
"The results today will have national repercussions across the country," Coffman said during a news conference, adding that other states are likely to take a look at new certification standards Colorado has put in place. We assume that the decision will be overturned in the next 30 days, based on how much money is involved. We all know that money trumps everything else. On the other hand, we hope there are significant repurcussions on a national level. Elections are too important to leave in the hands of computer programmers and hackers.
Having worked in the computer industry for over 30 years between us, Dookie and I know exactly how easy it would be for an unscrupulous (or well paid) programmer to slip a couple lines of code in the box that would totally change the outcome of an election, and how easy it would be to hack into one and change the results.
Our suggestion? Go low tech. Paper, pen, locked ballotbox, and human eyes to do the counting. Instead of paying $60,000 per machine to count the votes, just pay a group of poll workers to keep an eye on the polling places - making sure you have some from each party at each polling place to keep them from stuffing the ballot box. You have to pay the poll workers anyway, so that cost is a wash. This way you don't have to train them to fix the p.o.s. computers when they crash, and you don't have to worry about a ballot box "crashing" and losing all the votes in it - a definite concern with electronic machines. It eliminates a whole lot of confusion, since everyone knows how to use paper and pen, and it doesn't take a half hour to "boot up" a ballot box or a Bic. Last, and certainly not least, you have a paper trail, making recounts just as easy as the original count.
Sometimes Low Tech Rules
(Thanks to our good friend Nancy for sending us this story)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Spending more time with his Klan?
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
10:54 AM
Trent Lott Resigns from U.S. Senate

The number two Republicane in the Senate, Trent Lott, has resigned after two decades of service in Washington.
Lott stated from his home state on November 26th that he would resign by the end of the year. The 66-year-old Lott officially resigned from the U.S. Senate on Tuesday. He has been in the Senate since 1988.
Lott is the former Senate Majority Leader and apparently has many things in front of him which he still wants to do.
There are reports that he may be going into the lobbying business with a friend of his, former Sen. John Breaux.
Buh Bye!
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Destruction of Evidence is a Felony
posted by
Wally
9:19 AM
We should start a pool: how many pardons will Bush have to make? Tie breaker goes to whoever can guess the most names of people he'll pardon. And the list is growing fast.
It appears that several high ranking officials in the White House were directly involved in making sure the CIA "torture" videos were destroyed, even after the courts ruled that the tapes were to be preserved. At least four top White House lawyers took part in discussions with the Central Intelligence Agency between 2003 and 2005 about whether to destroy videotapes showing the secret interrogations of two operatives from Al Qaeda, according to current and former administration and intelligence officials. The accounts indicate that the involvement of White House officials in the discussions before the destruction of the tapes in November 2005 was more extensive than Bush administration officials have acknowledged.
Those who took part, the officials said, included Alberto R. Gonzales, who served as White House counsel until early 2005; David S. Addington, who was the counsel to Vice President Dick Cheney and is now his chief of staff; John B. Bellinger III, who until January 2005 was the senior lawyer at the National Security Council; and Harriet E. Miers, who succeeded Mr. Gonzales as White House counsel.
One former senior intelligence official with direct knowledge of the matter said there had been "vigorous sentiment" among some top White House officials to destroy the tapes. The former official did not specify which White House officials took this position, but he said that some believed in 2005 that any disclosure of the tapes could have been particularly damaging after revelations a year earlier of abuses at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. More cover ups. More crimes. More destruction of evidence sanctioned at the highest levels of government. It doesn't matter who you are, "spoilation of evidence" is a crime. Just ask Dick Nixon. So is Obstruction of Justice. Just ask Scooter Libby.
The rest of the people involved may get lucky if Dubya is feeling nice. Unfortunately for him, Bush can't pardon himself.
Arrest these men
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:30 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya at the Little Sisters of the Poor charity.

Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
|
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
|
How the mighty have fallen
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
2:22 PM
Frist Segways past White House Thirsty for work

As he segues into private life, former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was seen out in front of the White House Monday on a Segway. Frist, we hear, is filming a new commercial for Coca-Cola. He joins Bob Dole as a former Republican pol turned pitchman after his party's fortunes went south.
Former Prez-wannabe
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Judge to DOJ: Fah-Q!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:12 PM
Judge Orders Hearing On CIA Interrogation Tapes
A federal judge has ordered a hearing on whether the Bush administration violated a court order by destroying CIA interrogation videos of suspected terrorists.
U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy rejected calls from the Justice Department to stay out of the matter. He ordered lawyers to appear before him Friday morning.
In June 2005, Kennedy ordered the administration to safeguard "all evidence and information regarding the torture, mistreatment, and abuse of detainees now at the United States Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay."
Five months later, the CIA destroyed the interrogation videos. The recordings involved suspected terrorists Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri. The Justice Department argued that the videos weren't covered by the order because the two men were being held in secret CIA prisons overseas, not at the Guantanamo Bay prison.
Obstruction
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Do as he says, not as he does
posted by
Wally
7:57 AM
Bush is still threatening to veto the omnibus spending bill approved by the House on Monday if it doesn't include money for his war in Iraq (it currently doesn't). While the Democrats have made a number of concessions in an effort to compromise with the White House, Bush hasn't given anything in return. To Dubya, "compromise" means "you give me every damn thing I want".Bush issued a veto threat because of the lack of Iraq funds. Still, the administration noted "recent progress on the substance" of the measure, indicating that Bush may accept the legislation if Iraq funds are added by the Senate.
House Republicans said they were being forced to vote on a bill they hadn't been given enough time to read. "This is no way to run a railroad," Representative Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican, said last night. Bloomberg Poor poor Paul Ryan. Somebody call a waaaambulance. He didn't have enough time to read the bill. I feel so bad for the Republicans in Congress being abused by the Democrats, since we all know the GOP would never ever think of doing such things. Or would they? Of course they would.
Adding to Bush's veto threat, he came up with a typically irresponsible weaselly suggestion - one that would divert all accountability away from himself. One that would prevent him from actually having to face the possibilty of a "real" showdown - one that he might lose. One that would prevent him from having to give up anything, back down an inch, or admit that his ideas aren't perfect in every way - something the guy is physically incapable of doing.Bush added, "If the Congress can't get the job done - in other words, those jet fumes'll start to be moving out ... pretty soon here, later on this week - if they can't get the job done, then I've got a suggestion for them, and just pass a one-year continuing resolution. That's all they've got to do. If they can't get the job done, like I'm hopeful they will, then all they've got to do is just take what's called a continuing resolution, get the people's business done that way and go on home. They've got to make sure they fund the troops, though, on the way out of town." That's easy for him to say
I'm not even sure what he's talking about. How about next time we elect a President who speaks English? What I think he's saying is, "instead of challenging my ultimate God-given King-like authority, why don't they just throw up their hands, give up and let me get back to clearin' brush at the ranch. This presidentin' is hard work ya' know. What I mean is, it hurts my brain when I have to think and stuff. heh heh". Nice plan there boss. No wonder every one of your business ventures failed. I can see Dubya in a board meeting, "I don't want to work on the budget. It's got all them what are they called - "numbers" on it. It's boring. That's like math. I hate math. Let's go biking instead, and just do what we did last year again."
In the same speech, while telling Congress to fuck it and just to a repeat and stop bothering him, he tried to convince someone that he's really paying attention to detail.Even though Congress has bowed to his spending wishes, Bush warned lawmakers that he will be "watching very carefully as the Congress works through how to spend your money coming down the stretch before Christmas. They can't have any gimmicks - accounting gimmicks - in there." Hey George, do you mean the kind of "accounting gimmick" that makes $275.5 Billion deficit turn into $162.8 Billion?The new report said that the federal budget deficit would have been 69 percent higher than the $162.8 billion reported two months ago if the government had used the same accounting methods as private companies. Under the accrual method of accounting, the deficit would have totaled $275.5 billion for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30.
The deficit on a cash-flow basis of $162.8 billion represented the lowest imbalance in five years. The administration noted the decline in the deficit under both measurements. The Budget is Screwed It's okay for Bush to use accounting tricks to cook his books, but nobody else is allowed to do so. He also thinks it's something to brag about that last year he only lost $162 Billion dollars.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Mitt The Bitch
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:41 AM
Island tax havens factor into Romney's business success Involvement hasn't previously come to light

While in private business, Mitt Romney utilized shell companies in two offshore tax havens to help eligible investors avoid paying U.S. taxes, federal and state records show. Romney gained no personal tax benefit from the legal operations in Bermuda and the Cayman Islands. But aides to the Republican presidential hopeful and former colleagues acknowledged that the tax-friendly jurisdictions helped attract billions of additional investment dollars to Romney's former company, Bain Capital, and thus boosted profits for Romney and his partners.
Romney has based his White House bid, in part, on the skills he learned as co-founder and chief of Bain Capital, one of the nation's most successful private equity groups. His campaign cites his record while governor of Massachusetts of closing state tax loopholes; his involvement with foreign tax havens had not previously come to light.
In the Cayman Islands, Romney was listed as a general partner and personally invested in BCIP Associates III Cayman, a private equity fund that is registered at a post office box on Grand Cayman Island and that indirectly buys equity in U.S. companies. The arrangement shields foreign investors from U.S. taxes they would pay for investing in U.S. companies.
Romney still retains an investment in the Cayman fund through a trust. Campaign disclosure forms show the investment paid him more than $1 million last year in dividends, interest and capital gains.
In Bermuda, Romney served as president and sole shareholder for four years of Sankaty High Yield Asset Investors Ltd. It funneled money into Bain Capital's Sankaty family of hedge funds, which invest in bonds and other debt issued by corporations, as well as bank loans. Like thousands of similar financial entities, Sankaty maintains no office or staff in Bermuda. Its only presence consists of a nameplate at a lawyer's office in downtown Hamilton, capital of the British island territory....
Ruh Roh!
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
News you won't see on the MSM
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:37 AM
'Army Times' Article Describes U.S. Troop 'Mutiny' in Iraq
At Old Mod, Charlie Company was called back in for weapons training, DeNardi said. They were told it was an accident. Then they were told it was under investigation. And then they were told it was a suicide. Reynolds confirmed that McKinney took his own life.
.... 2nd Platoon had gathered for a meeting and determined they could no longer function professionally in Adhamiya - that several platoon members were afraid their anger could set loose a massacre.
"We said, 'No.' If you make us go there, we're going to light up everything," DeNardi said. "There's a thousand platoons. Not us. We're not going."
They decided as a platoon that they were done, DeNardi and Cardenas said, as did several other members of 2nd Platoon. At mental health, guys had told the therapist, "I'm going to murder someone." And the therapist said, "There comes a time when you have to stand up," 2nd Platoon members remembered. For the sake of not going to jail, the platoon decided they had to be "unplugged."
F Dubya's War
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Senator Dodd shows the Democrats what a spine looks like
posted by
Wally
7:24 AM
It's not "Mr. Smith Goes To Washington", but Sen. Christopher Dodd stood up to Bush, stood up the corporate owned Republicans, and stood up to his own sack-less party Monday in an effort to prevent them from giving immunity to the phone companies that broke the law and gave our personal phone records to the government in direct violation of the Constitution. He stood there for 10 hours, alone, and refused to budge on sacrificing the rights of all Americans for the sake of Bush and Bush's buddies at the telecomm companies.
To the surprise of Democrats everywhere who haven't seen a Democratic politician sporting balls in recent memory, it worked. At least for now.Connecticut senator Christopher Dodd's threatened filibuster of a bill giving immunity to telecoms that helped the government spy on Americans unexpectedly carried the day Monday, as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid decided to postpone the vote on the measure until after the winter break.
The announcement was an unexpected victory for civil liberties groups, whose anti-immunity fortunes looked grim this morning as the Senate looked primed to pass an expansive spying bill that would free telecoms like AT&T and Verizon from privacy lawsuits.
Dodd showed his moxie and determination all day, as he held the floor for long stretches, railing against an administration-backed bill that would have freed telecoms from 40-odd lawsuits pending against them in federal court.
The presidential candidate threatened to filibuster and hold the Senate floor if the Senate shot down his amendment to strip immunity from the bill. That threat moved Reid to postpone a vote on the bill, so that the Senate could take up war funding bills, a massive domestic spending bill and changes to the Alternative Minimum Tax before the winter break. WIRED What will happen in January when the bill comes back to the floor is anybody's guess. Dodd blocked it this time, but will he be able to do so again, or will the Democrats cave again under Dubya's mean smirk and threat of a veto? With history as my guide, I know where I'm putting my money.Interestingly, President Bush threatened to veto any FISA bill that did not include retroactive telecom immunity, saying that the FISA bill was essential to saving American lives.
Senator Ted Kennedy commented, "So if we take the president at his word, he's willing to let Americans die to protect the phone companies." Kennedy continued, angrily, "The president's insistence on immunity as a precondition for any FISA reform is yet another example of disrespect for honest dialogue and the rule of law." Filibusters Work
Maybe a few Dem politicians were paying attention yesterday. Maybe one or two learned a lesson. Maybe Santa will leave a backbone in their stockings for Christmas.
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Monday, December 17, 2007
|
Coalition of the shrinking: Brits and Aussies go home. Turkey crashes the party.
posted by
Wally
8:33 AM
When you walk into a holiday party, or any party really, you can usually tell at a glance whether you want to be there, or if you would rather just say hello, stay long enough to be polite and then leave. Depending on who's there, who's leaving, and who's showing up, you can guess whether it's likely to be a fun-filled night of laughter, friendship, and good cheer, or just another out of control drunk-fest accentuated by a fight or two and a visit by the police. Guess what kind of party is happening in Iraq.
The Brit and Aussies, our loyal friends and allies are bailing out and heading home.Nearly five years into the occupation of Iraq, the 'coalition of the willing' is about to lose two of its key supporters.
The British handover to Iraqi forces is seen as the beginning of the end for Britain, which plans to cut its troop numbers dramatically.
With Australia planning to withdraw its combat troops, the United States will soon be the only country left. Coalition of the Shrinking Well, not the "only" country. While our friends are leaving the party and heading home, the Turks - who we've been telling to stay the hell out - have just come bursting through the door and are already drunk and angry and itching for a fight.Turkey yesterday launched the biggest attack on Iraq since the US invasion in 2003, sending more than 50 warplanes to bomb suspected Kurdish insurgent bases inside Iraqi territory, accompanied by long-range artillery shelling. Kurdish officials reported at least one civilian fatality, a woman, and two others injured.
The head of Turkey's military said last night it had US approval for the air strikes. "America last night opened Iraqi airspace to us. By opening Iraqi airspace to us last night America gave its approval to the operation," the Anatolian state news agency quoted General Yasar Buyukanit as saying.
But a US official said: "We have not approved any decision. It is not for us to approve. However, we were informed before the event (the air strikes)."
At a meeting in Washington George Bush persuaded Erdogan to put off a full-scale land invasion of northern Iraq. In return, the US agreed to accept limited cross-border strikes and to provide US intelligence on Kurdish rebel movements. But Turkey still has tens of thousands of troops massed along the mountainous border with northern Iraq, along with tanks and artillery. This will end well It's going to be one hell of a nasty hangover.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:45 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya doing what he does best, mugging for the camera.

Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
Smokin' Joe Trader
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:38 AM
Strip this S.O.B. of his chairmanships!
Sen. Joe Lieberman endorses John McCain for president
 Sen. Joe Lieberman is crossing party lines and endorsing Republican Sen. John McCain for president.
"Being a Republican is important. Being a Democrat is important. But you know what's more important than that? The interest and well-being of the United States of America," the Democrat-turned Independent said in announcing his decision Monday morning in New Hampshire.
"Let's put the United States first again, and John McCain is the man as president who will help us do that," he said.
Lieberman was the Democrats' vice presidential nominee in 2000.
The Connecticut senator decided to endorse McCain because he considers him "the most capable to be commander in chief on day one of his administration, and the most capable of uniting the country so that we can prevail against Islamic extremism," a Lieberman aide said earlier.
Joe Sucks!  3some?
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Sunday, December 16, 2007
|
Pistol Packing Corruption
posted by
Clyde
5:48 AM
Coast Guard Employee Alleges Retaliation Whistle-Blower Seeks Probe of His Charges Against Staff of DHS Inspector General
A civilian U.S. Coast Guard employee was placed on paid administrative leave, threatened with a criminal investigation and confronted by guards at gunpoint in retaliation for disclosing information embarrassing to the service's troubled fleet replacement program, his attorney said.
Anthony D'Armiento, a former Northrop Grumman systems engineer working for the Coast Guard's acquisitions department, asked the Bush administration to appoint an independent inspector general to investigate his allegations against staff members of Richard L. Skinner, inspector general of the Department of Homeland Security. D'Armiento's attorney called their actions "an egregious act of intimidation and excessive force" against a government whistle-blower.
(Snip)
D'Armiento cooperated, but after he was told he could retrieve his office and home computers from Skinner's offices in Rosslyn on Oct. 29, Paul Weare, an investigator for the DHS inspector general, attempted to question D'Armiento. When D'Armiento refused to answer, three guards appeared, one pointed a gun at his chest, denied him his equipment and threatened him with arrest if he returned, Katz said.
(Snip)
Katz wrote that when D'Armiento declined to speak with Weare in an interrogation room and said, "I want my computer back now," Weare told him to "back off" and "get out of [his] face." After a guard drew his handgun, prompting D'Armiento to say he would call the police, a guard replied, "We are the police," Katz wrote.
(Link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
The story within the story
posted by
Clyde
5:26 AM
While the story is important, it is the story within that caught my eye. How long have the Bushies been beating their chest talking about how the surge is working. Yet, the "purpose" of the surge was supposed to be the Iraqi government getting their shit together. Seems their interests lie elsewhere.
Pro-U.S. Volunteer Force Attacked in Iraq
A wave of violence, including attacks on a pro-American Sunni volunteer force, left eight people dead in Iraq on Saturday, police officials said.
The assaults came as the U.S. military reported the death of an American soldier, killed by small-arms fire in the northern province of Nineveh on Friday.
In the mostly Sunni neighborhood of Adhamiyah in northern Baghdad, a member of the volunteer force Sahwa -- or "Awakening" -- was killed and three were injured when a man delivered a bomb, placed inside a car anti-theft device, to guards at the front gate.
(Snip)
"We expect that attacks against us would increase unless the government would help us," Rashid said. "The government is hiding inside the Green Zone, and we are fighting in the hot zones. Only Americans are assisting us."
(Link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
How much more love are the troops willing to take?
posted by
Clyde
5:00 AM
Feds ask judge to reject suit over treatment of combat vets
The government asked a San Francisco federal judge on Friday to dismiss a high-profile lawsuit challenging the system of treatment and benefits for returning combat veterans.
The government's lawyers argued that civil courts have no authority over the Department of Veterans Affairs' medical decisions or how it handles grievances and claims.
"If plaintiffs are not happy with the way the system is currently working, their remedy is to take it up with Congress" or with the veterans department, Justice Department attorney Daniel Bensing told U.S. District Judge Samuel Conti.
He said that in 1988, Congress created a system of reviewing veterans' claims and it can't be second-guessed by regular courts. It was the first hearing on the nationwide lawsuit that is being closely watched by veterans, their families and advocacy groups.
(Shameful)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Saturday, December 15, 2007
|
Bush Loves Torture
posted by
Wally
10:34 AM
Dubya threatens to veto bill that ban's torture - which is stupid, because as he said "the U.S. doesn't do torture"
The House of Representatives has adopted a bill requiring US intelligence agencies to renounce all forms of torture by following explicit rules set out by the US military.
The provision passed by the House, part of a 2008 intelligence budget, says the military's rules on interrogation methods must apply to civilians as well, including CIA staff.
The measure still needs to be passed by the Senate and the White House warned President George W. Bush would veto the bill. Democrats in Congress apparently lacked enough votes to overcome the expected veto, with the House bill passed by a vote of 222 to 199.
The White House said Tuesday the text "would prevent the US from conducting lawful interrogations of senior al Qaeda terrorists to obtain intelligence needed to protect Americans from attack." No dumbass, the bill would prevent the US from conducting UNlawful interrogations. It says nothing about lawful ones.
Since Bush likes torture so much, let's try it on him and his administration. Try all sorts of "enhanced interrogation" methods on them. Any tactic that they can take for 3 or 4 months without renouncing, we'll keep. Anything that gets them to piss their pants, plead for mercy, and/or cry like a French soccer player, we'll reserve just for them, for their hearings in front of Congress or at the Hague.
Can't spell "Waterboard" without a Dubya
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Mukasey tells Congress "Trust us, we'll investigate ourselves and let you know if we did anything wrong."
posted by
Wally
10:14 AM
Attorney General Michael Mukasey refused Friday to give Congress details of the government's investigation into interrogations of terror suspects that were videotaped and destroyed by the CIA. He said doing so could raise questions about whether the inquiry is vulnerable to political pressures.
In letters to leaders of the House and Senate Judiciary committees that oversee the Justice Department, Mukasey said there is no need right now to appoint a special prosecutor to lead the investigation. The preliminary inquiry is being handled by the Justice Department and the CIA's inspector general.
"I am aware of no facts at present to suggest that department attorneys cannot conduct this inquiry in an impartial manner," Mukasey wrote Friday to Sens. Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, the top Democrat and Republican, respectively, on the Senate Judiciary Committee. "If I become aware of information that leads me to a different conclusion, I will act on it." In other words, "Trust me" - because who do you trust more than a Bush appointed Attorney General to investigate the crimes committed in his own organization? So what are the Dems in Congress going to do about it? My guess is that they'll write a harshly worded letter, and then wring their hands and pretend to act tough while they let Mukasey rub it in their faces and laugh. Just like Fredo did before him. Just like we all warned them he would do if they approved him."We are stunned that the Justice Department would move to block our investigation," Reyes and Hoekstra said. "Parallel investigations occur all of the time, and there is no basis upon which the Attorney General can stand in the way of our work. ... It's clear that there's more to this story than we have been told, and it is unfortunate that we are being prevented from learning the facts. The executive branch can't be trusted to oversee itself." No shit Dick Tracy. That's some mighty fine detective work there, figuring out they can't be trusted. I'm stunned that Reyes and Hoekstra are stunned. What the hell else did they expect? These are the kind of guys that stick a fork in a socket and get shocked - and after doing it for the 100th time, they are still shocked that they get shocked.
The Bush administration has been doing this exact same thing for 7 years. Anyone who thinks they are going to do anything differently now, without being forced, is a moron. Without calling for a special investigator, Mukasey will stall for a while while talking about how his people are investigating (while they're sitting around in back rooms drinking and laughing about all the fun they had torturing people while they destroy more evidence), and then he'll come out and say "nope, we're clean. See ya".
Criminals and morons
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Dems roll over into dying cockroach position again
posted by
Clyde
5:20 AM
Congress authorizes war funds and sends bill to Bush
The Democratic-led Congress authorized more Iraq war spending on Friday, sending President George W. Bush a defense bill requiring no change in strategy after failing again to impose a timetable for U.S. troop withdrawals.
The defense policy bill, approved 90-3 by the U.S. Senate, also expanded the size of the U.S. Army and set conditions on the Bush administration's plan to build a missile defense system in Europe.
The measure already had passed the House of Representatives and now goes to Bush, who is expected to sign it into law. It authorizes Pentagon programs expected to cost $506.9 billion during fiscal 2008, which began in October.
The bill authorized another $189.4 billion for the Iraq and Afghan wars, for which Congress has already approved some $600 billion. But it does not deliver the new money. That is done by appropriations legislation at the center of a big dispute on Capitol Hill.
(Wimps)
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Why do our vets need to go to court to get what they deserve?
posted by
Clyde
4:56 AM
Court rules vets home lawsuit can go forward
The residents of the Armed Forces Retirement Home in the nation's capital got an early shot of holiday cheer Friday: the possibility of better medical care sometime down the road.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed a lower-court ruling that dismissed a class-action lawsuit filed by residents over the quality of medical care provided at the home. The reversal means that the suit will go forward in the lower court.
In 2005, residents of the home sued the chief operating officer and the secretary of defense, asking for an injunction to compel the home to provide a primary treatment room staffed by an on-location physician and primary health care for residents 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
It also asked that the home be able to provide "the medications required for the treatment of residents ... X-ray, electrocardiogram, lab work and other services"; annual physical and mental exams; and other services, such as transportation.
(Link)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Friday, December 14, 2007
|
Arthur Andersen, Enron, Bush Administration
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:05 PM
Bush Secret Shredding Soars
 HELL BENT ON DESTRUCTION Shredding contracts during Bush/Cheney
Behold, the Bush Administration in chart form: Federal spending on paper shredding has increased more than 600 percent since George W. Bush took office. This chart, generated by usaspending.gov, the U.S. government's brand spanking new database of federal expenditures, shows spending on "contracts for paper shredding services" going back to 2000. Click here for the full, heartbreaking breakdown. In 2000, the feds spent $452,807 to make unpleasant truths go away; by 2006, the "Cheney Effect" had bumped that number up to $2.9 million. And by halfway through 2007, the feds almost matched that number, with $2.7 million and counting. Pretty much says it all.
I see a trend
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
They're partying in oil company boardrooms today
posted by
Wally
9:02 AM
Dems Cave, and Big Oil Gets To Stay On Welfare
Senate Dems pussed out again and caved to a Bush veto threat - this time it was the Energy bill. While they managed to bump up fuel economy standards for cars and trucks, but failed to take the big oil companies off the welfare rolls. While poor people and single mothers are being kicked off of welfare and having to abandon their kids at home alone to do that "uniquely American" thing and work second or third jobs so they can "put food on their families" and pay for that $3/gallon gas, multinational mega-conglomo-oil companies like Exxon-Mobile and BP-Amoco are getting billions in government assistance.
The republicans think this is fair, and the Dems are too big of pussies to call them out on it.Last January, House Democrats inaugurated their control of Congress by picking a fight with Big Oil, moving to repeal the industry's tax breaks within the first 100 days of the new Congress. On Thursday, the battle ended - and Big Oil won.
Facing a veto threat from the White House, Senate Democrats were defeated in an attempt to raise more than $12 billion for alternative energy by revoking production tax breaks and raising other taxes on oil and gas producers.
Earlier in the day, after Republicans blocked the bill that included the rollback of tax breaks, Mr. Reid's top lieutenant, Sen. Richard Durbin, lashed out at oil companies that opposed the bill.
"Oil companies are now celebrating in their boardrooms," said Mr. Durbin, D-Ill. "They continue to have a death grip on this Senate." Dick, it's not the fault of the oil companies that they have that death grip. They are doing what they are expected to do to maximize profits, doing the same thing they've been doing for decades. If the oil companies have a death grip on the Senate, it's the fault of the Senate. The dems are in charge now - supposedly. The Dems need to go to the "spine" store and buy a backbone, and then put it to use to and remove themselves from the oil industry death grip.
While they're at it, maybe they can loosen the pharmaceutical industry, insurance industry, and banking industry death grips too.
Not likely
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:44 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya and Barney.

Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Thursday, December 13, 2007
|
Contempt
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:30 PM
U.S. lawmakers vote to hold Bolten and Rove in contempt
The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee voted on Thursday to hold two top aides to President George W. Bush in contempt of Congress for refusing to cooperate in its probe of fired federal prosecutors.
On a largely party-line vote of 11-7, the Democratic-led panel sent contempt citations against White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten and former Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove to the full Senate for consideration.
As with many of Bush's battles with the Democratic-led Senate, the president may ultimately prevail since his fellow Republicans may be able to block the citations with a procedural hurdle.
Bush has claimed executive privilege to protect aides from complying with congressional subpoenas demanding documents or testimony in an investigation into the firing last year of nine U.S. attorneys. The committee has rejected his privilege claim as unfounded.
Gitmo their azz
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Guess who's blocking progress at the climate meetings in Bali
posted by
Wally
9:55 AM
There was a time when the United States was a global leader in innovation and technology. When we, as a nation, strove to be at the forefront of worldwide trends - trying to advance the betterment of humanity. At least that's what we were told growing up. It's a shame we won't be able to tell our kids the same thing. Now, under Bush's (ahem) leadership, instead of leading the charge, we're standing in the way of it. U.S. blocks global plan to cut emissions
U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon conceded Wednesday that the United States had succeeded in achieving one of its key objectives at the climate conference here, blocking a proposal that called on industrialized nations to cut their greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent to 40 percent by 2020. Chicago Tribune What the hell is wrong when the only remaining superpower's main role is getting in the way of world progress? That's like Superman using his powers to block the doors at the police station so the cops can't get out and fight crime. Way to be a hero!
On the other hand, the guy who actually got more votes than George in the 2000 election is once again stepping up to the plate, and once again speaking truth to power, calling out the U.S. stance for what it is - obstructionist, arrogant, counterproductive, selfish, and stupid."My own country the United States is principally responsible for obstructing progress in Bali," spurring rapturous applause and cheers.
Arriving fresh from Oslo, where he had collected the Nobel Peace Prize, Gore urged governments to forge a "new path" towards a global climate change agreement in spite of what he described as an obstructive United States.
"I don't know how you can navigate around this enormous elephant in the room which I've been undiplomatic enough to name. But I'm asking you to do it," he said. Gore was defeated by President George W. Bush in the 2000 presidential race.
Earlier on Thursday, the EU accused the United States of climate inaction, saying the rest of the world was still waiting for U.S. leadership, and threatened to boycott a U.S.-hosted climate meet of major economies next month. Reuters There's an old phrase "lead, follow, or get out of the way". The U.S. used to lead - using it's wealth and resources to develop technologies to improve the plight of man (communications, agriculture, medicine, science, etc.). Even Reagan at least pretended to take a leadership role - when he was awake. With Bush and the neo-con republicans in charge, that "leadership" has stalled, and now we're rolling backwards.
They won't lead. They're too arrogant to follow, and too stupid or lazy or greedy or power-hungry to get out of the way. So I'm going to add "or get run over" to the end of that. If the U.S. won't lead, follow, or get out of the way - if we continue to stand in the way of progress - we're going to be run over and left behind. The rest of the world won't wait. They're no longer impressed by the elephant in the room. And they're sick of cleaning up it's shit.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Bush Priorities on Display
posted by
Wally
7:40 AM
Bush: $196 Billion a year to bomb Iraqi kids = Vital. $5 Billion a year for American kids healthcare = Veto
After spending the past couple months ranting and raging about the Democrats not giving him another $196 Billion blank check for 2008 for his wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Bush yesterday vetoed, for the second time, the SCHIP bill, which would spend less than 3% that much for children's health care here at home. For the second time in three months, President Bush on Wednesday vetoed legislation that would have expanded the State Children's Health Insurance program by $35 billion over five years and would have boosted its enrollment to about 10 million children.
Bush cited the same reasons that led him to veto a version of the bill on Oct. 3 - that it raised cigarette taxes and provided coverage for children of middle-class families instead of focusing on the working poor. Remember that. Whenever you hear freepers and ditto-heads use the phrase "class warfare" they are talking about the war that the super rich and powerful are waging on the middle class. In this case, they're not even man enough to go after the working middle class. They're picking on their kids.
Priorities
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
|
Are you sitting down?
posted by
Clyde
2:10 PM
For a minute there I thought it was too many drugs in the 80's!
Gonzales named lawyer of the year
Negative news coverage may have cost former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales his job, but it won him a dubious honor Wednesday from a magazine published by the American Bar Association: Lawyer of the Year.
Additionally, the ABA Journal named Gonzales' successor, Attorney General Michael Mukasey, as its top lawyer for 2008 - mostly in anticipation of how often he'll be in the media spotlight for trying to repair the beleaguered Justice Department.
The monthly magazine gave the awards to lawyers who made the most news, said editor and publisher Edward A. Adams.
"Think about Time magazine's Person of the Year," Adams said in an interview. "In years past they've named people like Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin. So we're not suggesting by these awards that these are the best lawyers in any sense of the word. We are saying they are the most newsworthy - and perhaps also the best."
(Whew!)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
7 years ago today
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:21 PM
Bush v. Gore
Docket: 00-949 Citation: 531 U.S. 98 (2000) Petitioner: Bush Respondent: Gore
Facts of the Case
Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, and concurrent with Vice President Al Gore's contest of the certification of Florida presidential election results, on December 8, 2000 the Florida Supreme Court ordered that the Circuit Court in Leon County tabulate by hand 9000 contested ballots from Miami-Dade County. It also ordered that every county in Florida must immediately begin manually recounting all "under-votes" (ballots which did not indicate a vote for president) because there were enough contested ballots to place the outcome of the election in doubt. Governor George Bush and his running mate, Richard Cheney, filed a request for review in the U.S. Supreme Court and sought an emergency petition for a stay of the Florida Supreme Court's decision. The U.S. Supreme Court granted review and issued the stay on December 9. It heard oral argument two days later.
Conclusion
Noting that the Equal Protection clause guarantees individuals that their ballots cannot be devalued by "later arbitrary and disparate treatment," the per curiam opinion held 7-2 that the Florida Supreme Court's scheme for recounting ballots was unconstitutional. Even if the recount was fair in theory, it was unfair in practice. The record suggested that different standards were applied from ballot to ballot, precinct to precinct, and county to county. Because of those and other procedural difficulties, the court held that no constitutional recount could be fashioned in the time remaining (which was short because the Florida legislature wanted to take advantage of the "safe harbor" provided by 3 USC Section 5). Loathe to make broad precedents, the per curiam opinion limited its holding to the present case.
Rehnquist (in a concurring opinion joined by Scalia and Thomas) argued that the recount scheme was also unconstitutional because the Florida Supreme Court's decision made new election law, which only the state legislature may do.
Breyer and Souter (writing separately) agreed with the per curiam holding that the Florida Court's recount scheme violated the Equal Protection Clause, but they dissented with respect to the remedy, believing that a constitutional recount could be fashioned. Time is insubstantial when constitutional rights are at stake.
Ginsburg and Stevens (writing separately) argued that for reasons of federalism, the Florida Supreme Court's decision ought to be respected. Moreover, the Florida decision was fundamentally right; the Constitution requires that every vote be counted.
Decision (12/12/2000)
Enjoy having a pineapple shoved up your ass everyday at 1pm by Satan when you're in hell Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas!
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Checks and Balances? Those are only for Democratic Presidents
posted by
Wally
10:07 AM
Like when he issues signing statements saying that the bill he's signing into law doesn't apply to him, Dubya had no qualms about ignoring the rulings of the courts as well. Those two branches of government? They are there to serve him, aren't they? What is that phrase the Republicans kept using about Gonzo and Rummy and Karl? Oh yeah, as far as Bush is concerned, the Congress and the Courts "serve at the pleasure of the President."
Unfortunately, the Constitution has something different to say about that, but that's just a "goddamn piece of paper" anyway. Bush has no problem ignoring his oath to uphold and defend that goddamn piece of paper, and ignoring what it says. There's no pictures in the Constitution anyway, and he can't even color in it, so it's of no interest to him.
You ask, what did he do this time? Remember those CIA torture interrogation tapes that were destroyed? Yup, the court explicitly ordered that they be saved.CIA Destroyed Tapes Despite Court Order
The Bush administration was under court order not to discard evidence of detainee torture and abuse months before the CIA destroyed videotapes that revealed some of its harshest interrogation tactics.
The CIA destroyed the tapes in November 2005. That June, U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy Jr. had ordered the Bush administration to safeguard "all evidence and information regarding the torture, mistreatment, and abuse of detainees now at the United States Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay."
U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler issued a nearly identical order that July.
"It's logical to infer that the documents were destroyed in order to obstruct any inquiry into the means by which statements were obtained," Remes said. That's what they got Scooter for - obstruction. Who's going to take the fall this time (so that they can be pardoned by Bush before they have to do time).
Imbalance of Power
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
No George, it's "do it FOR the children" not "do it TO them"
posted by
Wally
9:49 AM
Why does Bush hate the children? Or is it just poor children that he hates? Either way, he's determined to make sure that when they get sick, they stay sick.Bush ready with children's health-care veto No. 2
President Bush is ready to veto -- again -- a bill offering an expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program.
Bush vetoed the first $35-billion S-CHIP expansion that crossed his desk, complaining that it covered middle-class children at the expense of the poor. And his veto was sustained.
Democratic congressional leaders insist the expansion of a popular program which assists low-income families with health care could offer insurance to nearly 10 million children whose families cannot afford coverage on their own. But the White House says Congress still lacks the votes to override another S-CHIP veto -- which will be penned today.
"We have the votes still to sustain the veto," Dana Perino, the White House press secretary, said this morning. "We'll get that done today, because the deadline is today. It's as if Perino and Dubya are eager to tell the kids to fuck off. I can picture them sitting together giggling as he picks up his veto pen and once again kills a bill to provide them with health insurance.
Sick
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Pretty impressive credentials for a president: "I wasn't a knee-walking drunk"
posted by
Wally
7:51 AM
Now there's something to put on your resume to impress people. Maybe print it out and hang it over your desk at work. Bush: 'I Doubt I'd Be Standing Here If I Hadn't Quit Drinking Whiskey'
"I had too much to drink one night, and the next day I didn't have any," Bush said. "The next day I decided to quit and I haven't had a drink since 1986."
"I wasn't a knee-walking drunk," Bush said. "It's a difficult thing to do, which is to kick an addiction." While I give him credit for kicking his alcohol habit, I have to ask, where the hell was this story in 1999? The mass media was too busy making fun of Gore for "inventing the internets" to notice that the man who's ass they were protecting was an alcoholic and a coke-head. Of course that didn't stop them from making drunk jokes about Ted Kennedy, but Dubya was somehow immune from even casual scrutiny. But that's okay, because at least he wasn't a "knee-walking drunk." At least not that he remembers.
Cheers!
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:41 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of dubya with Jewish leaders (L-R) Dr. Vladimir Kvint, President of the International Academy of Emerging Markets; Yuli Edelstein, Deputy Speaker of the Knesset; and Rabbi Gershom Sizomu, Abayudaya Jews of Uganda.

Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
|
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
|
Bush is making a strong impression on young people. That impression is "Vote Democrat"
posted by
Wally
9:51 AM
President George W. Bush has made a strong impression on younger Americans; it's not the one Republicans wanted.
Faster than you can say "Facebook," the under-30 set is moving toward the Democratic Party. That is forcing Republicans to redouble their appeals to these voters, who are heading to the polls in bigger numbers, reversing years of declining participation. The shift may have implications for Republicans beyond 2008.
"Younger voters are critical," said Whit Ayres, a Republican pollster who isn't affiliated with any candidate. "There's a good deal of evidence that partisan inclinations reached when you first go through your formative political years tend to be reasonably stable."
Forty-four percent of 18-to-29-year-olds consider themselves Democrats, while 23 percent identify with the Republican Party, according to a Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll. It wasn't always this way: President Ronald Reagan won 59 percent of the youth vote in his 1984 bid for a second term. This gives me hope for the future - whatever future is left after this administration leaves office.
Bush the Uniter
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
We tried telling you people to send more bacon!
posted by
Wally
9:14 AM
Nurses' Union: Cheney Would Be Dead By Now
Some might view it as distasteful - Vice President Dick Cheney's office calls it "outrageous" - but a nurses union is sticking by its eye-popping ad running in 10 different Iowa newspapers today. The ad features a cut-out newspaper article about Cheney's latest hospitalization for heart treatment with the boldface words: If he were anyone else, he'd probably be dead by now.
Click image for full ad in .pdf format Showing why you don't mess with people who put up with the kind of shit that nurses put up with, a spokesman for the California Nurses Association and the National Nurses Organizing Committee tells the Washington Post's The Sleuth blog that it's Cheney and the Bush administration who are outrageous:"What's outrageous is we have an administration that sits on its hands while we have 47 million people who are uninsured ... This administration has ignored this health care crisis," says Charles Idelson, spokesman for the California Nurses Association and the National Nurses Organizing Committee. "They're indifferent to pain and suffering."
The group is advocating proposed universal government-run health care legislation, one of whose 88 co-sponsors includes Democratic presidential underdog candidate Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio). There's more about the unions' claims and its ad campaign here.
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Even Republicans don't like the GOP candidates
posted by
Wally
8:31 AM
According to the latest NY Times/CBS News poll, Rudy leads the pack among Republicans, with 41% of them viewing him favorably. Everyone else fares even worse.Poll Finds G.O.P. Field Isn't Touching Voters (Which is a nice change from the usual headline about Republicans touching voters' poles)Three weeks before the Iowa caucuses, Republican voters across the country appear uninspired by their field of presidential candidates, with a vast majority saying they have not made a final decision about whom to support, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.
Not one of the Republican candidates is viewed favorably by even half the Republican electorate, the poll found. And in a sign of the fluidity of the race, former Gov. Mike Huckabee of Arkansas, who barely registered in early polls several months ago, is now locked in a tight contest nationally with Rudolph W. Giuliani and Mitt Romney.
On the Republican side, in contrast, Mr. Giuliani is viewed favorably most frequently, and that is by only 41 percent. Senator John McCain is viewed favorably by 37 percent, and Mr. Romney by 36 percent. Mr. Huckabee is viewed favorably by 30 percent, and 60 percent say they do not know enough about him to offer an opinion, suggesting that he may be vulnerable to the kind of attacks that his opponents have already been mounting against him. Personally, I'm hoping Giuliani wins the nomination, because he'd be the funniest one to campaign against. Any one of them will be hilarious, but Rudy would be pure comedy gold.
Tell me about that "permanent Republican majority" again, Unka Karl
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Have the Democrats found a ball?
posted by
Wally
7:47 AM
Bush said he'd veto their bill because, in addition to trying to compromise with him by giving him even more money for his war in Iraq, it also includes spending money at home. The Dems reply to his veto threat by finally saying "Fine, fuck you. You get nothing."
Okay, so it's a lot more than nothing, but it includes nothing for his war. The Dems are changing their "compromise" by pulling the excess spending that Georgie doesn't like, and also yanking ALL funding for the Iraq war. A Democratic deal to give President Bush some war funding in exchange for additional domestic spending appeared to collapse last night after House Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.) accused Republicans of bargaining in bad faith.
Instead, Obey said he will push a huge spending bill that would hew to the president's spending limit by stripping it of all lawmakers' pet projects, as well as most of the Bush administration's top priorities. It would also contain no money for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
"Absent a Republican willingness to sit down and work out a reasonable compromise, I think we ought to end the game and go to the president's numbers," Obey said. "I was willing to listen to the argument that we ought to at least add more for Afghanistan, but when the White House refuses to compromise, when the White House continues to stick it in our eye, I say to hell with it."
(snip)
"It is extraordinary that the president would request an 11 percent increase for the Department of Defense, a 12 percent increase for foreign aid, and $195 billion of emergency funding for the war while asserting that a 4.7 percent increase for domestic programs is fiscally irresponsible," Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert C. Byrd (D-W.Va.) said. What is extraordinary about it Sen. Byrd? It's the same thing he he's been pulling since he took office.
The more I hear from Rep. Obey, the more I like him. How can we get him to replace Pelosi for the Speaker seat, because, with her in charge, I will be amazed if the Dems don't back down and give Little Boots every thing he wants, just like they always do.
For now, it's nice to see at least one Democrat stand up to the spoiled sonofabitch and tell him "no".
A spine? or a charade?
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Monday, December 10, 2007
|
The Real Reason for Bush's Mortgage Bailout
posted by
Wally
9:00 AM
Interest rate 'freeze' - the real story is fraud Bankers pay lip service to families while scurrying to avert suits, prison
New proposals to ease our great mortgage meltdown keep rolling in. First the Treasury Department urged the creation of a new fund that would buy risky mortgage bonds as a tactic to hide what those bonds were really worth. (Not much.) Then the idea was to use Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to buy the risky loans, even if it was clear that U.S. taxpayers would eventually be stuck with the bill. But that plan went south after Fannie suffered a new accounting scandal, and Freddie's existing loan losses shot up more than expected.
Now, just unveiled Thursday, comes the "freeze," the brainchild of Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. It sounds good: For five years, mortgage lenders will freeze interest rates on a limited number of "teaser" subprime loans. Other homeowners facing foreclosure will be offered assistance from the Federal Housing Administration.
But unfortunately, the "freeze" is just another fraud - and like the other bailout proposals, it has nothing to do with U.S. house prices, with "working families," keeping people in their homes or any of that nonsense.
The sole goal of the freeze is to prevent owners of mortgage-backed securities, many of them foreigners, from suing U.S. banks and forcing them to buy back worthless mortgage securities at face value - right now almost 10 times their market worth. Read more here Now why would anyone accuse a Bush administration of being complicit in fraud in the banking industry? Maybe Neil Bush could answer that (Google "savings and loan scandal"). A more important question is, since it was written by the banking industry, who is Bush's plan designed to help and protect?
Just like the Medicare Plan B Prescription drug plan, written by the pharmaceutical industry was designed to make shitloads for the pharmaceutical industry (screw the senior citizens). Just like Cheney's energy policy, written by the oil and coal industries was designed to make metric shitloads of money for the oil and coal industries (screw the people trying to fill their gas tank or heat their homes). This bailout plan is designed to save the asses of the banking industry, and screw the people that the banks already screwed.
The same think happened in the '80's when the taxpayers paid to bail out the criminals running the S&L's. Why should it be different this time?
Fraud
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:33 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya and Laura with some elves.

Permalink
::
5 comments
::
|
|
|
Sunday, December 9, 2007
|
Wouldn't want to do anything for this country now would you George?
posted by
Clyde
7:33 AM
Bush Would Veto More Domestic Spending Tied to War
President George W. Bush would veto a Democratic proposal to tie war funding to billions of dollars of additional domestic spending, White House budget director Jim Nussle said.
Democrats are drafting a spending bill that would provide as much as $70 billion in new war spending linked to about $11 billion more in domestic spending than Bush requested in his budget. The war funds wouldn't be tied to Iraq troop withdrawals as they have been in prior measures.
"Instead of trying to leverage troop-funding for more pork-barrel spending, Congress ought to pass responsible appropriations bills,'' Nussle said in a statement today. If Congress approved the proposed spending deal, "the president would veto it,'' Nussle said.
Democrats, who have a majority in both houses of Congress, are in a standoff with Bush over $190 billion in war funding requested by the administration. A $50 billion spending bill linked to troop withdrawals was blocked by Senate Republicans this month, and Democrats had said they won't approve any more money this year.
(Link)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
How are those sanctions working out for ya George?
posted by
Clyde
6:56 AM
Iran, China set to sign major oil deal: minister
Iran and China's Sinopec could, as early as Sunday, sign a final multi-billion dollar agreement for the development of the Yadavaran onshore oil field, the Iranian oil minister said.
"Iran could probably sign a contract this evening with China's Sinopec to develop Yadavaran," Oil Minister Gholam Hossein Nozari told reporters on the sidelines of an oil conference.
"If not today, it will be in two weeks time. We are still in talks," he said.
In late October 2004, Iran and Sinopec inked an initial agreement to develop the Yadavaran onshore field, southwestern Iran, which is estimated to hold more than three billion barrels of recoverable crude.
(Link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Saturday, December 8, 2007
|
Big Brother can't handle dissent
posted by
Clyde
7:40 AM
Here come the thought police
With overwhelming bipartisan support, Rep. Jane Harman's "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" passed the House 404-6 late last month and now rests in Sen. Joe Lieberman's Homeland Security Committee. Swift Senate passage appears certain.
Not since the "Patriot Act" of 2001 has any bill so threatened our constitutionally guaranteed rights.
The historian Henry Steele Commager, denouncing President John Adams' suppression of free speech in the 1790s, argued that the Bill of Rights was not written to protect government from dissenters but to provide a legal means for citizens to oppose a government they didn't trust. Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence not only proclaimed the right to dissent but declared it a people's duty, under certain conditions, to alter or abolish their government.
In that vein, diverse groups vigorously oppose Ms. Harman's effort to stifle dissent. Unfortunately, the mainstream press and leading presidential candidates remain silent.
(Link)
Permalink
::
7 comments
::
|
|
Dems assume dying cockroach position on Iraq funding again!
posted by
Clyde
7:29 AM
Hill Close To Deal on War Funds Democrats Would Drop Iraq Timeline
House Democratic leaders could complete work as soon as Monday on a half-trillion-dollar spending package that will include billions of dollars for the war effort in Iraq without the timelines for the withdrawal of combat forces that President Bush has refused to accept, House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) said yesterday.
In a complicated deal over the war funds, Democrats will include about $11 billion more in domestic spending than Bush has requested, emergency drought relief for the Southeast and legislation to address the subprime mortgage crisis, Hoyer told a meeting of the Washington Post editorial board.
If the bargain were to become law, it would be the third time since Democrats took control of Congress that they would have failed to force Bush to change course in Iraq and continued to fund a war that they have repeatedly vowed to end. But it would also be the clearest instance yet of the president bowing to a Democratic demand for more money for domestic priorities, an increase that he had promised to reject.
"The way you pass appropriations bills is you get agreement among all the relevant players, among which the president with his veto pen is a very relevant player," Hoyer said. "Everybody knows he has no intention of signing anything without money for Iraq, unfettered, without constraints. I think that's ultimately going to be the result."
(pussies)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Friday, December 7, 2007
|
Olbermann Special Comment - "President Chicken Little"
posted by
Wally
3:41 PM
"We have either a president who is too dishonest to restrain himself from invoking World War III about Iran, at least 6 weeks after he had to have known that that analogy would be fantastic irresponsible hyperbole. Or, we have a president too transcendently stupid not to have asked, at what now appears to have been a series of opportunities to do so, whether the fairy tales he either created or was fed, were still even remotely plausible.
The Pathological Presidential Liar or Idiot in Chief.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
8:07 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya at his press conference on Tuesday.

Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
Worst Jobs
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:29 AM
White House Hopefuls Name Worst Jobs
The Associated Press asked major presidential candidates a series of questions about their personal tastes, traits and backgrounds. Today's question - first in a series - and their answers:
What was your worst job?
DEMOCRATS:
New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton: "Sliming fish in a fish cannery in Valdez, Alaska."
.....
REPUBLICANS:
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee: "Washing windows at JCPenney's and stocking shelves when I was 14 years old. It was a great job and it was a great company but they worked me hard. Just as I'd get all the fingerprints wiped off the door, somebody would come and they'd put their hands all over the glass. To this day, I'm still very sensitive about never touching the glass, but touching the handles because I had to wipe those windows so many times."
Former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson: "I've worked in a factory, I was a bouncer at my uncle's drag strip, I worked at the post office, I sold children's shoes, I sold ladies', I sold men's clothing, I was a night clerk at a motel. I can't think of a job that I had that I wasn't thankful for at the time."
Fred, meet Rudy. Rudy, Fred.

Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
The spin starts now
posted by
Clyde
5:22 AM
Leave it to the "librul" media to step in and help Bush justify an attack on Iran.
Report on Iran fuels Arab fears
The dwindling possibility of a U.S. attack on Iran is changing the dynamics of Middle East politics and raising Arab concern that Tehran may now feel emboldened to strengthen its military, increase its support for Islamic radicals and exert more influence in the region's troubled countries.
Saudi Arabia and other Arab nations opposed military action against Iran's nuclear program. But, analysts said, those governments were privately relieved that U.S. threats helped to further preoccupy Tehran, which had irritated much of the Arab world with its deep involvement in the politics of Iraq and Lebanon and support for the radical Palestinian group Hamas.
The U.S. intelligence report released Monday, which says Iran does not have an active nuclear weapons program, has eased international pressure for sanctions and invigorated the Islamic Republic's hard-liners. This comes as the Arab world has been trying to counter Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's rhetoric and his government's influence over the presidential turmoil in Lebanon, the politics in Syria and the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.
The report did not allay Arab fears over Iran's nuclear intentions and its program to enrich uranium.
(Link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
And now from the "No Sh*t" File
posted by
Clyde
5:15 AM
Bush loses ground with military families A majority disapprove of the president's handling of the war in Iraq and are more in line with the views of the general public.
Families with ties to the military, long a reliable source of support for wartime presidents, disapprove of President Bush and his handling of the war in Iraq, with a majority concluding the invasion was not worth it, a Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll has found.
The views of the military community, which includes active-duty service members, veterans and their family members, mirror those of the overall adult population, a sign that the strong military endorsement that the administration often pointed to has dwindled in the war's fifth year.
Nearly six out of every 10 military families disapprove of Bush's job performance and the way he has run the war, rating him only slightly better than the general population does.
And among those families with soldiers, sailors and Marines who have served in Iraq or Afghanistan, 60% say that the war in Iraq was not worth the cost, the same result as all adults surveyed.
(Duh)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Thursday, December 6, 2007
|
Republicans' response to the new NIE report, as told by Dr. Seuss
posted by
Wally
9:11 AM
Intelligence reports now say Irani's nukes have gone away. They stopped you see back in '03 and ended their bomb-making spree 'cause sanctions and diplomacy had worked to keep Iran nuke free.
Georgie saw the new report and sputtered out an old retort, "Iran is still so bad bad bad. They're lying and that makes me mad. They're scary and they want us dead. We'll bomb them, then I'll go to bed."
Cheney's heart went on the fritz when the media began it's blitz. They showed what the report had found so Dick came up from underground. He left his undisclosed location. "they're lying" was his declaration.
While Bush was spinning and complaining the candidates were out campaigning. Mitt and Rudy, Huck and Ron and don't forget there's Fred and John. What did they think? What would they say? About the new report today.
Huckabee said "huh? who me? I haven't heard a thing, you see." Ronnie sounded almost sane when he attempted to explain "why can't we just be rational and get some international cooperation and advice. Let's call our friends and all play nice"
Freddy said "they're stupid-heads, instead I'd rather trust my mom." Rudy cried out "9/11" then he said "we have to bomb. Shock and awe them, use our force like I did with my last divorce."
Mitt and John were inconclusive. Their answers both were quite elusive. We must be tough, and have resolve but remember humans did not evolve! We're both pro-life, oh can't you see although we didn't used to be. The new report just proves we're right to use our military might.
What that means I cannot say. Republicans are strange that way.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Another Republican "Moral Values" Myth Busted
posted by
Wally
7:45 AM
The government is spending 1.5 Billion of our tax dollars (and asking for more) to promote "abstinence only" education in our schools. Rather than teaching about such immoral and embarrassing subjects like std's, pregnancy and other risks involved in having sex, and how to mitigate those risks by doing such immoral things as using rubbers properly, these programs avoid those topics (or gloss over them by saying things like "condoms don't work") and teach teenagers (pronouonce "walking hormones who don't give a rat's ass what adults think anyway) only one thing - don't have sex.
Problem is, abstinence-ony programs don't work. Like so many other things that the Republicans and the Moral Majority have implemented, that $1.5 Billion is a complete waste of our taxpayer money. Let's look at three recent studies.
Report:Abstinence Only Programs Don't Work
Programs that focus exclusively on abstinence have not been shown to affect teenager sexual behavior, although they are eligible for tens of mil lions of dollars in federal grants, according to a study released by a nonpartisan group that seeks to reduce teen pregnancies.
"At present there does not exist any strong evidence that any abstinence program delays the initiation of sex, hastens the return to abstinence or reduces the number of sexual partners" among teenagers, the study concluded.
The study found that while abstinence-only efforts appear to have little positive impact, more comprehensive sex education programs were having "positive outcomes" including teenagers "delaying the initiation of sex, reducing the frequency of sex, reducing the number of sexual partners and increasing condom or contraceptive use." Like so many studies in the past, one more time the findings are that these programs simply do not work to prevent or even slow down teens from having sex. Even if they did, the next study sheds new light on the "who cares" factor. While the christian fundies are lurking in our bedrooms telling us how evil we are for wanting to do what comes naturally (when they're not lurking in men's rooms doing what they claim doesn't), a new study has found that teen sex might actually be "good" for kids.
Study Debunks Theory On Teen Sex and Delinquency New Analyses Challenging Many Old Assumptions
Other things being equal, a more probing study has found, youngsters who have consensual sex in their early-teen or even preteen years are, if anything, less likely to engage in delinquent behavior later on.
The team looked at identical twin pairs in which one twin initiated sex younger than the other, then team members tallied subsequent problem behaviors. If sex really adds to the chances of delinquency, then early-sex teens should end up delinquent more often than their later-sex twins.
"It turns out that there was no positive relationship between age of first sex and delinquency," Harden said.
Perhaps most surprising, the Virginia study found that adolescents who had sex at younger ages were less likely to end up delinquent than those who lost their virginity later. Many factors play into a person's readiness for sex, but in at least some cases sexual relationships may offer an alternative to trouble, the researchers say. So by teaching kids to "abstain at all costs" we're wasting money on a program that is not only completely ineffective, but might have the exact opposite effect from what it proposes. We're spending billions of dollars on a program that is actually turning our kids into worse delinquents.
It gets worse. By not providing them with adequate information to be safe when they are having all that sex that they're told not to have in the abstinence-only lessons, we are turning them into pregnant delinquents.
Teenage Birth Rate Rises for First Time Since '91
The birth rate among teenagers 15 to 19 in the United States rose 3 percent in 2006, according to a report issued Wednesday, the first such increase since 1991. The finding surprised scholars and fueled a debate about whether the Bush administration’s abstinence-only sexual education efforts are working.
Teenage birth rates are driven by rates of sex, contraception and abortion. In the 1990s, teenage sex rates dropped and condom use rose because teenagers were scared of AIDS, said Dr. John S. Santelli, chairman of the department of population and family health at Columbia University.
But recent advances in AIDS treatments have lowered concerns about the disease, and AIDS education efforts, which emphasized abstinence and condom use, have flagged.
Perhaps as a result, teenage sex rates have risen since 2001 and condom use has dropped since 2003. Abortion rates have held steady for a decade, although numbers from 2005 and 2006 are not available. Just like they have since the first human teenage boy looked at the first human teenage girl and had to hold a fig leaf in front of him to hide his boner (just like every one of you guys out there had to occasionally do with your books in school), kids are going to be ruled by their raging hormones, and are going to do what they do.
Not that I'm advocating or encouraging teen sex, or even saying it's a good idea, but isn't it time to use some common sense? It's always happened. It's always going to happen. It's happening now. Let's go back to giving kids the information they need and deserve so they at least know how to be safe when they do it. The little brats deserve the knowledge, just like they deserve to be creeped out the same way we were when we had to listen to the old fat bald gym teacher/football coach try not to act embarrassed as he stammered his way through lessons about anatomy and reproduction and STD's. They deserve the chance to mess with him even more by asking him really embarrassing questions that they already know the answer to, just like we did when we were in school. Let's give them that chance.
If nothing else, let's at least stop wasting all that money to make things worse.
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Wednesday, December 5, 2007
|
Just like when daddy saved brother Neil's ass in the Savings and Loan bail-out
posted by
Wally
11:49 PM
Mr. "I got a B in Economics 101" comes up with a plan to bail out the subprime mortgage lending situation
Pretending to have the vaguest clue what the hell he's talking about, gee Dubya has a plan to solve the sub-prime lending / foreclosure / housing bubble burst. In other words, his high dollar friends in the banking community are in a panic, and he's riding to their rescue, with a plan written specifically with them in mind (probably written by them - though he may have glanced at some of the pictures). President George W. Bush is expected to outline on Thursday a plan to freeze mortgage rates for five years for many U.S. homeowners facing sharp increases in their monthly payments, industry sources said on Wednesday.
Final details of the plan are still being worked out after a trade group that represents large mortgage investors presented its framework for implementing a broad rate freeze to the Treasury Department late on Tuesday, the sources said. Like I said, written by the banking industry. So you just know this is going to help out the little guy, just like every other Republican (or Bush) plan.Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has worked closely with the investor trade group - the American Securitization Forum - as well as mortgage servicers and lenders to hammer out a comprehensive plan to modify troubled loans.
The backing of mortgage investors is important to the success of any rate freeze plan as it would give some cover to mortgage servicers and others in the industry who could face lawsuits from bondholders if they began to tinker with loans. There you go - take care of the shysters who marketed cheap loans, low payments, and the "American dream" of owning a home to people who couldn't afford it, using the same tactics they use to sell you pills to make your dick bigger. As for the rest of us - who are either responsible with our money, or aren't educated enough to wade through the legalese language of contracts - we're fucked.
Another Bush Banking Bailout
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Where in the World Is Osama bin Laden?
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
3:28 PM
Did Morgan Spurlock find Osama bin Laden? 15 minutes of footage shown at film fest sparks bidding war, speculation
 Rumors are flying that filmmaker Morgan Spurlock of "Super Size Me" fame may have done what the United States government has failed to do for the last six years - find Osama bin Laden.
The speculation first began at the Berlin International Film Festival in February, where Spurlock showed a select group of potential buyers 15 minutes of footage from his new documentary, "Where in the World Is Osama bin Laden?" The film follows Spurlock through the Middle East in his search for the elusive leader of al-Qaida. According to Slashfilm.com, The Weinstein Co. quickly snapped up the picture after seeing the clips.
Adding to the belief, Daniel Marracino, the film's director of photography, is quoted in Variety, saying of the movie, "We've definitely got the Holy Grail."
Mr. Super Size Me still cares about OBL
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
First daughter calls president during "Ellen."
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:41 PM
Shockingly, he wasn't busy:
First Daughter Calls President During 'Ellen' Show

During Wednesday's "Ellen Degeneres Show," first daughter Jenna Bush demonstrates just how easy it is for her to get through to her famous father.
Jenna Bush's appearance on the show was taped on Tuesday. During the conversation that ranged from living as a celebrity to Jenna's recent engagement, Ellen asked how easy it is to call her parents.
So Jenna called President George W. Bush from the set to show her.
"This is the Ellen Degeneres Show," Jenna tells the president when he gets on the line.
"Well, that's great!" the president said.
"How's it going?" Ellen asked.
"It's going great, Ellen. How's my little girl doing?"
Bush talked to a lesbian! OMG!
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
To those who say our government never does anything worthwhile...
posted by
Wally
10:08 AM
74 years ago today, Congress ratified, and President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed into law the 21st amendment repealing prohibition, saying "I think this would be a good time for a beer."
As if there is ever a bad time for a beer.
Raise a toast to honor Prohibition Repeal DayThere are no outfits to buy, costumes to rent, rivers to dye green. Simply celebrate the day by stopping by your local bar, tavern, saloon, winery, distillery, or brewhouse and having a drink. Pick up a six-pack on your way home from work. Split a bottle of wine with a loved one. Buy a shot for a stranger. Just do it because you can.The 21st Amendment Ratified December 5, 1933 Section 1. The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.
Section 2. The transportation or importation into any State, Territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use there in of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited.
Section 3. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by conventions in the several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.
Happy Repeal Day
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
For once I can say: Go Pelosi!!!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:37 AM
Pelosi targets oil firms in energy push
Defying a threat of a presidential veto, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi intends to push ahead with a $21 billion tax package, including repeal of tax breaks for major oil companies, as part of an energy bill, aides to the speaker said Tuesday.
Democratic leaders circulated a summary of the legislation that includes the new taxes as well as a requirement for a 40 percent increase in automobile fuel efficiency, a huge increase in the use of ethanol as a motor fuel, and a mandate for utilities to use renewable fuels.
Republicans earlier this year blocked Senate attempts to pass new energy taxes, contending they would hinder domestic oil and gas production. Democratic supporters of the taxes said that with oil hovering near $90 a barrel and the industry making large profits, the tax breaks aren't needed.
The White House has said repeatedly that if the energy legislation singles out the oil companies for new taxes, advisers would recommend that President Bush veto the bill.
Advisers = Exxon, Shell, Chevron, etc.
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:18 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya waxing eloquent at Tuesday's press conference.

Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
|
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
|
Supporting the Troops the Bush way. Until they come home, then the hell with 'em
posted by
Wally
11:42 AM
Arab-American paratrooper faces deportation when he returns from Afghan service
A highly decorated Arab-American sergeant in the US army, who is currently serving as a paratrooper in Afghanistan, faces deportation on his return to the United States because of an irregularity in his immigration papers.
Sgt Hicham Benkabbou has been served with an order to stand trial for deportation as soon as he arrives home, despite the fact that he has been on active service in Afghanistan for almost two years with the 508th parachute infantry regiment, known as the Red Devils. His lawyers say his treatment illustrates the harsh justice meted out to Arab-Americans by the US immigration authorities.
"This is a very disturbing case. This man has been serving our nation, putting his life on the line on behalf of America. This is a setback to attempts to encourage recruitment to the military," said the ADC's Imad Hamad.
His lawyer in Atlanta, Georgia, Paul Ford, said the only explanation he could find was that his client was a Muslim, "which sets off all the buzzers. There is no question that Arab-Americans are given a totally different treatment."
Ford said that Benkabbou had been accused of being a terrorist by officials from the immigration enforcement agency, ICE. "In court, ICE lawyers called Morocco a terrorist country, which I found astonishing." Of course he's a terrorist. He has brown skin and a funny name, and has been seen in middle eastern nations carrying loaded weapons and associating with roving gangs of heavily armed militants. The fact that those militants are U.S. soldiers, and he was sent to those middle eastern nations by the U.S. Army is beside the point.
I wonder how many of those ICE lawyers have yellow ribbons on the back of their SUV's.
Support the Troops
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Bush: Intelligence reports are for pussies. I still want to bomb Iran
posted by
Wally
9:37 AM
Contrary to the U.S. intelligence assessment that came out this week stating that Iran punted it's nuke program at least 4 years ago due to diplomatic pressure, Dubya is still refusing to give up his plan to play with his toy soldiers and planes and bombs over there.President George W. Bush said on Tuesday that Iran remains a danger despite a U.S. intelligence report that Tehran halted its atomic weapons program four years ago.
Bush also said "all options" are on the table for dealing with Iran. He was speaking at a news conference a day after intelligence agencies released an assessment that contradicted his administration's earlier assertions that Iran was developing a nuclear bomb. They might have the desire to one day develop nuclear weapons related program activities, so we have to kill them all.
You can't spell War without Dubya
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
This time Bush and Cheney got caught lying before we invade
posted by
Wally
8:19 AM
Sorry Dick, Iran has not had "nuclear weapons related program activities" since 2003. You'll have to make up another excuse to invade.
Anyone that was paying attention knew that Dick and George were lying and making stuff up before we invaded Iraq. It was made obvious by the constantly changing stories and reasons for going to war, and by the weak evidence they presented to support the constantly changing reasons - when they bothered to present any evidence at all. Those who weren't paying attention, along with the major news media didn't catch on until it was too late. Fox news viewers are still clueless.
This time it looks like someone is paying closer attention.A new assessment by American intelligence agencies concludes that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and that the program remains frozen, contradicting judgment two years ago that Tehran was working relentlessly toward building a nuclear bomb.
The new estimate declares with "high confidence" that a military-run Iranian program intended to transform that raw material into a nuclear weapon has been shut down since 2003, and also says with high confidence that the halt "was directed primarily in response to increasing international scrutiny and pressure."
Rather than painting Iran as a rogue, irrational nation determined to join the club of nations with the bomb, the estimate states Iran's "decisions are guided by a cost-benefit approach rather than a rush to a weapon irrespective of the political, economic and military costs." The administration called new attention to the threat posed by Iran earlier this year when President Bush had suggested in October that a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to "World War III" and Vice President Dick Cheney promised "serious consequences" if the government in Tehran did not abandon its nuclear program. Sorry Dick, you and Halliburton can't have your war this time. You'll just have to resort to getting your jollies by shooting old men in the face.
Give Peace a Chance
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Monday, December 3, 2007
|
Bush:"Congress needs to stop stalling and pass a spending bill. But not like the ones they already passed that I vetoed."
posted by
Wally
1:17 PM
Bush is whining about Congress not getting him his spending bills, claiming the whole country will grind to a halt if he doesn't have a spending bill on his desk before the Christmas recess. I wonder if it will be as catastrophic as it was when the GOP controlled Congress failed to pass 9 out of 11 spending bills last year? I'm not talking about failing to pass them before recess, I'm talking about failing to pass them, period. The Republicans just left them hanging out there, unfinished, for the Democrats to hammer out when they took control - maybe as a roadblock to prevent the Dems from being able to pass any other legislation until they finished cleaning up after the Republican mess. What should be more embarrassing about that for the GOP, if the Republicans could be embarrassed about incompetence and lack of ethics, is that the GOP controlled congress didn't even have to worry about a veto threat - since Bush didn't veto a single spending bill they handed him in 6 years, no matter how much pork was piled onto it. Not one.
He's also bitching about not getting the Iraq occupation financing bill that he wants, saying the troops will have to starve and go naked and without bullets if Congress doesn't pass a bill giving them all the money he asked for. Of course, he vetoed a bill giving him MORE money than he asked for, but that's beside the point. He's crying like a spoiled brat about not getting every single thing he wants and not getting it all RIGHT NOW.
The president demanded that legislators authorize funding for the war in Iraq without requiring troop withdrawals; permanently approve legislation that allows eavesdropping in terrorism probes while also prohibiting private lawsuits against telecommunications companies that have provided the data; adjust the alternative minimum tax to reflect wage inflation; and pass 11 pending government spending bills without loading them down with pork. What he's not saying is that Congress has already given him much of what he has asked for, and more, but he's been veto-happy and rejected much of what Congress has given him.
Bush excoriated Congress for enacting only one of 12 government spending bills. Congress has actually approved two bills, but the president vetoed one. Congress has also given him the money for Iraq, but he vetoed it because there were conditions on the money - namely a "non-mandatory" timetable for beginning to bring the troops home. Dubya can't stand that. The bratty little snot can't ever let anyone tell him what to do, ever. He must have been just a bundle of joy to raise as a kid. No wonder Barbara is such a bitch.
The way I see it is, dude, you don't want the money for your war? Fine. Fuck you. You don't get the money. Bring the troops home. To paraphrase Rummy, "you don't always go to war with the supplementary spending bill you want, you go to war with the supplementary spending bill you have." If Dubya doesn't like the spending bills Congress sends him because they aren't EXACTLY the bill he requested, to the penny? Fine. Give him nothing. Congress should simply take the bill he vetoed, hand it back to him and let him veto it again. And again. And again. Let him keep refusing to accept the money, and then laugh at him when he whines about not having enough to run the government.
Take it or leave it.
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
How bad do you have to screw up....?
posted by
Wally
11:17 AM
Paul Wolfowitz is like a boomerang. More accurately, he's like a mongrel dog that keeps coming back and knocking over the garbage cans and trashing the neighborhood no matter how many times he's chased away.
Don't ever say the Bush administration doesn't take care of its own. Nearly three years after Paul Wolfowitz resigned as deputy Defense secretary and six months after his stormy departure as president of the World Bank-amid allegations that he improperly awarded a raise to his girlfriend-he's in line to return to public service. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has offered Wolfowitz, a prime architect of the Iraq War, a position as chairman of the International Security Advisory Board, a prestigious State Department panel, according to two department sources who declined to be identified discussing personnel matters. The 18-member panel, which has access to highly classified intelligence, advises Rice on disarmament, nuclear proliferation, WMD issues and other matters. "We think he is well suited and will do an excellent job," said one senior official. 
Wolfowitz, now a visiting scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, will replace former senator Fred Thompson, who quit over the summer to run for president. Although officials declined to say how Rice came to choose him, Wolfowitz began his government career in the 1970s in the State Department as an arms-control expert; he forged a relationship with Rice during the 2000 presidential campaign, when they both served as top foreign-policy advisers to the then candidate Bush. But his selection has raised more than a few eyebrows within State because he'll be providing advice on some of the same issues that critics say the administration got spectacularly wrong when Wolfowitz was pushing the case for the Iraq War at the Pentagon. (One of the department sources called the appointment "amazing.") At least Wolfowitz, who did not return calls seeking comment, will have like-minded company: other panel members include Robert Joseph, the former National Security Council official in charge of Iraq WMD intelligence, and ex-CIA director James Woolsey, both strong allies during the Iraq debate.
The sources said Wolfowitz has already accepted Rice's offer to fill the part-time position, though it won't be announced until the completion of a standard check for conflicts of interest. But he won't have to worry about any complaints from pesky Democrats. The position doesn't require Senate confirmation. I'm a tree-hugger, but even I agree that sometimes problem wolves need to be culled from the pack. But if you think about it, he's a perfect fit in the Bush administration. He's been wrong on everything he's done. He blames everyone else for his shortcomings and wrongdoings and never admits to anything. And every time he screws up they invite him back to screw up again. Also, being a good neo-con Republican, Wolfie might be providing other "benefits" that make Bush want him to keep him around.
He'll huff and puff and...
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:57 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya with German Chancellor Angela Merkel

Permalink
::
5 comments
::
|
|
Shock and ?
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:52 AM
Moldova nearly doubles Iraq troop presence

Nearly doubling its current troop presence in the occupation of Iraq, Moldova's government has announced that it is increasing from 11 to 20 the sixth group of soldiers that it is sending to the troubled country.
. . .
In return for their loyalty, Moldova's national army is being armed by the American military with new equipment that will help it launch a new war against Transdniestria (officially, Pridnestrovie). In 1992, Moldova attempted to take control of Transdniestria but the attack failed in part due to the low quality of its outdated Soviet-era military hardware.
Today, the United States is actively equipping Moldova with "high-quality equipment, the latest equipment" for winning what some now fear could be a future war against Transdniestria.
" - Thanks to the United States- assistance, our troops - particularly those who deal with explosives - have high-quality equipment, the latest equipment," says Alexei Carasiov, a ranking Moldovan officer. "We have it in our hands," he confirms.
Lawn dart army
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Sunday, December 2, 2007
|
Iraqi security more important than American security
posted by
Clyde
7:42 AM
White House seeks to slash anti-terror funds Homeland Security grants may be cut by more than half, documents show
The Bush administration intends to slash counterterrorism funding for police, firefighters and rescue departments across the country by more than half next year, according to budget documents obtained by The Associated Press.
The Homeland Security Department has given $23 billion to states and local communities to fight terrorism since the Sept. 11 attacks, but the administration is not convinced that the money has been well spent and thinks the nation's highest-risk cities have largely satisfied their security needs.
The department wanted to provide $3.2 billion to help states and cities protect against terrorist attacks in 2009, but the White House said it would ask Congress for less than half - $1.4 billion, according to a Nov. 26 document.
The plan calls outright elimination of programs for port security, transit security, and local emergency management operations in the next budget year. This is President Bush's last budget, and the new administration would have to live with the funding decisions between Jan. 20 and Sept. 30, 2009.
(Link)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
The "not so subtle" cover-up
posted by
Clyde
7:32 AM
Secrecy invoked on Abramoff lawsuits
The Bush administration is laying out a new secrecy defense in an effort to end a court battle about the White House visits of now-imprisoned lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
The administration agreed last year to produce all responsive records about the visits "without redactions or claims of exemption," according to a court order.
But in a court filing Friday night, administration lawyers said that sometime in the past year the Secret Service identified a category of highly sensitive documents that might contain information sought in a lawsuit about Abramoff's trips to the White House.
The Justice Department declared that the contents of the "Sensitive Security Records" cannot be publicly revealed even though they could show whether Abramoff made more visits to the White House than those already acknowledged.
(Link)
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Keeping your friends close
posted by
Clyde
6:54 AM
US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
AMERICA has told Britain that it can "kidnap" British citizens if they are wanted for crimes in the United States.
A senior lawyer for the American government has told the Court of Appeal in London that kidnapping foreign citizens is permissible under American law because the US Supreme Court has sanctioned it.
The admission will alarm the British business community after the case of the so-called NatWest Three, bankers who were extradited to America on fraud charges. More than a dozen other British executives, including senior managers at British Airways and BAE Systems, are under investigation by the US authorities and could face criminal charges in America.
Until now it was commonly assumed that US law permitted kidnapping only in the "extraordinary rendition" of terrorist suspects.
(Link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Saturday, December 1, 2007
|
Tempting the addict with another needle
posted by
Clyde
8:20 AM
Bush handed blueprint to seize Pakistan's nuclear arsenal
The man who devised the Bush administration's Iraq troop surge has urged the US to consider sending elite troops to Pakistan to seize its nuclear weapons if the country descends into chaos.
In a series of scenarios drawn up for Pakistan, Frederick Kagan, a former West Point military historian, has called for the White House to consider various options for an unstable Pakistan.
These include: sending elite British or US troops to secure nuclear weapons capable of being transported out of the country and take them to a secret storage depot in New Mexico or a "remote redoubt" inside Pakistan; sending US troops to Pakistan's north-western border to fight the Taliban and al-Qaida; and a US military occupation of the capital Islamabad, and the provinces of Punjab, Sindh and Baluchistan if asked for assistance by a fractured Pakistan military, so that the US could shore up President Pervez Musharraf and General Ashfaq Kayani, who became army chief this week.
"These are scenarios and solutions. They are designed to test our preparedness. The United States simply could not stand by as a nuclear-armed Pakistan descended into the abyss," Kagan, who is with the American Enterprise Institute, a thinktank with strong ideological ties to the Bush administration, told the Guardian. "We need to think now about our options in Pakistan,"
(Idiots All)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
His hypocrisy has no bounds
posted by
Clyde
8:05 AM
Tom Tancredo Hired Illegal Laborers to Renovate His McMansion
When Republican Representative Tom Tancredo isn't railing against the "scourge" of illegal immigration on the presidential campaign trail, he relaxes in the 1053 square foot basement recreation room of his Littleton, Colorado McMansion. There, he and his family can rack up a game of billiards on their tournament size pool table, play pinball, or enjoy their favorite movies in the terraced seating area of a home theater system. Tancredo, who dodged the draft during the Vietnam War by producing evidence that he suffered from mentally illnesses, especially likes entertaining his buddies with classic war movies.
"We have friends over and I have now shown Pearl Harbor about six times," Tancredo boasted to the Rocky Mountain News about his 102-inch television. "But I mainly just show the attack scene because the sound is so good."
When Tancredo hired a construction crew to transform his drab basement into a high-tech pleasure den in October 2001, however, he did not express concern that only two of its members spoke English. Nor did he bother to check the workers' documentation to see if they were legal residents of the United States. Had Tancredo done so, he would have learned that most of the crew consisted of undocumented immigrants, or "criminal aliens" as he likes to call them. Instead, Tancredo paid the crew $60,000 for its labor and waited innocently for the completion of his elaborate entertainment complex.
(Ole')
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headlines
& Comments |
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Store |
 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Amazon.com |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|