Home

Columnists

Merchandise

Other Stuff

 

 Air America Radio

 Head-On Radio Network

 Search dubyaD40.com

Google


Search Web
Search dubyaD40.com

 Ads by The Google

 Take Action

 Recent Posts

 Archives

 Today's Reason To Drink



 Want to link to us?


It's easy to do.  Right click on the image below and choose "Copy."  Then paste it on your site.


 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 Today's Topics

 
Friday, November 30, 2007
Rudy: Falsifying the numbers
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:42 PM

Citing statistics, Giuliani misses time and again

In almost every appearance as he campaigns for the Republican presidential nomination, Rudolph W. Giuliani cites a fusillade of statistics and facts to make his arguments about his successes in running New York City and the merits of his views.

Discussing his crime-fighting success as mayor, Mr. Giuliani told a television interviewer that New York was “the only city in America that has reduced crime every single year since 1994.” In New Hampshire this week, he told a public forum that when he became mayor in 1994, New York “had been averaging like 1,800, 1,900 murders for almost 30 years.” When a recent Republican debate turned to the question of fiscal responsibility, he boasted that “under me, spending went down by 7 percent.”

All of these statements are incomplete, exaggerated or just plain wrong. And while, to be sure, all candidates use misleading statistics from time to time, Mr. Giuliani has made statistics a central part of his candidacy as he campaigns on his record.

For instance, another major American city claims to have reduced crime every year since 1994: Chicago. New York averaged 1,514 murders a year during the three decades before Mr. Giuliani took office; it did not record more than 1,800 homicides until 1980. And Mr. Giuliani’s own memoir states that spending grew an average of 3.7 percent for most of his tenure; an aide said Mr. Giuliani had meant to say that he had proposed a 7 percent reduction in per capita spending during his time as mayor.

He does know 9-11 though!

Permalink :: 7 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Impeachment
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:36 PM

Biden: Impeachment if Bush bombs Iran

Presidential hopeful Delaware Sen. Joe Biden stated unequivocally that he will move to impeach President Bush if he bombs Iran without first gaining congressional approval.

Biden spoke in front of a crowd of approximately 100 at a candidate forum held Thursday at Seacoast Media Group. The forum focused on the Iraq war and foreign policy. When an audience member expressed fear of a war with Iran, Biden said he does not typically engage in threats, but had no qualms about issuing a direct warning to the Oval Office.

"The president has no authority to unilaterally attack Iran, and if he does, as Foreign Relations Committee chairman, I will move to impeach," said Biden, whose words were followed by a raucous applause from the local audience. Biden said he is in the process of meeting with constitutional law experts to prepare a legal memorandum saying as much and intends to send it to the president.

When local resident Joel Carp asked Biden why not impeach now, given what has already been done, Biden said it was a valid point, but might not be constitutionally valid and potentially counterproductive. A case for impeachment must have clear evidence, Biden said, and blame should be directed at the right parties. "If you're going to impeach George Bush, you better impeach (Vice President Dick) Cheney first," said Biden, again drawing applause.

Biden said the best deterrent to prevent pre-emptive military action in Iran is to make it clear, even if it is at the end of his final term, action will be taken against Bush to ensure "his legacy will be marred for all time."...

Ya right

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Oh no you di'int!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:41 AM

African-Americans apparently used to blow themselves up and tried to take over the country, forcing the government to make them sit in the back of the bus:

Rice: I know what it's like to be Palestinian

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice reportedly said in Annapolis this week that her childhood in the segregated South had helped her to understand the suffering on both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

"I know what its like to hear that you can't use a certain road or pass through a checkpoint because you are a Palestinian. I know what it is like to feel discriminated against and powerless," Rice told a closed meeting of Arab and Israeli representatives, according to the Dutch representative at the summit, Franz Timmermans.

"Like Israelis, I understand what it's like to go to sleep not knowing if you will be hurt in an explosion, the feeling of terror walking around your own neighborhood, or walking to your house of prayer," Timmermans quoted Rice as saying, the Washington Post reported.

Rice described her childhood in Birmingham, Alabama, during the era of segregation and the killing of four young girls in a bombing at a Baptist church in 1963. She reportedly said the bombing, which killed one of her classmates, helps her understand the fear of terrorism felt by Israelis.

Make me a sammich, Condi!

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Goose meet Gander
posted by Clyde
5:26 AM

U.S. Special Counsel Says He Won't Provide Files
Official Calls Personal Records Not Relevant to OPM Probe

A U.S. official overseeing a probe of potential White House misconduct declared through a spokesman yesterday that he will not give federal investigators copies of personal files that he deleted from his office computer.

The decision by Special Counsel Scott J. Bloch escalates the confrontation between the Bush appointee and the White House, each of which is investigating the other.

Bloch's office is tasked with upholding laws against whistle-blower retaliation and partisan politicking in federal agencies. Earlier this year, Bloch directed lawyers in his office to look into charges that former Bush adviser Karl Rove inappropriately deployed government employees in Republican political campaigns.

Bloch had previously been targeted by the White House, which in 2005 asked the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to investigate allegations that Bloch had retaliated against whistle-blowers among his own staff members and improperly dismissed whistle-blower cases brought to the agency by others.

(Link)

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

No longer a matter of trust
posted by Clyde
4:57 AM

Virginia GOP Gets Strict on Voting
Demand for Loyalty Pledge at Primary Targets Crossovers, Independents

The loyalty pledge to the Republican Party that Virginia voters will be required to sign if they vote in the state's GOP presidential primary on Feb. 12 is another attempt by the party to police the open primary system.

On Feb. 12, a GOP primary voter will have to sign a piece of paper that says, "I, the undersigned, pledge that I intend to support the nominee of the Republican Party for President."

Party officials said Wednesday they are worried that Democrats and independents have infiltrated past GOP nominating contests. The state does not require voters to register by political party, which means a voter can decide on the day of the primary whether to participate in the Republican or Democratic primary.

Political analysts say it is rare for a partisan voter aligned with one party to vote in the other party's nominating contest. But some conservatives say Democrats and independents helped Sen. John W. Warner (R-Va.) win his 1996 primary against James C. Miller III. In 2000, Arizona Sen. John McCain (R) urged Democrats and independents to vote for him in Virginia's GOP presidential primary. But McCain lost to George W. Bush by 59,000 votes.

(Link)

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, November 29, 2007
This is why you don't let criminals police themselves
posted by Wally
8:15 AM

Bush appointee investigating Rove Used "Geeks on Call" to Delete Files On His Office Computer

The head of the federal agency investigating Karl Rove's White House political operation is facing allegations that he improperly deleted computer files during another probe, using a private computer-help company, Geeks on Call.

Scott Bloch runs the Office of Special Counsel, an agency charged with protecting government whistleblowers and enforcing a ban on federal employees engaging in partisan political activity. Mr. Bloch's agency is looking into whether Mr. Rove and other White House officials used government agencies to help re-elect Republicans in 2006.

Recently, investigators learned that Mr. Bloch erased all the files on his office personal computer late last year. They are now trying to determine whether the deletions were improper or part of a cover-up, lawyers close to the case said.

Mr. Bloch had his computer's hard disk completely cleansed using a "seven-level" wipe: a thorough scrubbing that conforms to Defense Department data-security standards. The process makes it nearly impossible for forensics experts to restore the data later. He also directed Geeks on Call to erase laptop computers that had been used by his two top political deputies, who had recently left the agency.

Mr. Bloch was a loyal member of the Bush administration, serving in the Justice Department's office of faith-based programs, when the president named him to head the Office of Special Counsel in 2003. Unlike many administration appointees, Mr. Bloch doesn't serve at the pleasure of the president. He has a fixed five-year term and may be removed only for malfeasance. That is supposed to ensure his agency has the independence to pursue any probe.
Cover-up

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Rudolph the red nosed adulterer
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:37 AM

Can you imagine if Clinton did this? They'd hang him.

City Said to Have Paid Bills as Giuliani Affair Began

Late in his tenure as mayor of New York, Rudolph W. Giuliani billed tens of thousands of dollars in travel expenses to little-known city agencies as he was beginning an extramarital affair, a political Web site reported yesterday.

The report, on the Politico Web site, cited documents obtained under the New York State Freedom of Information Law. But it was unclear from those documents whether Mr. Giuliani allocated those travel costs, from 1999 through 2001, to obscure city offices in an attempt to conceal expenses associated with the relationship or for some accounting purpose.

The administration of Mr. Giuliani's successor, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, said in 2002, several months after taking office, that the Giuliani administration had kept the budget for the mayor's office artificially low by paying more than $5 million in salaries through other city agencies. The agencies to which Mr. Giuliani billed the travel expenses were outside the mayor's office.

.....

The documents obtained by Politico, described as American Express bills and travel documents, detailed hotel, gas and other costs for the detectives on trips to Southampton, N.Y. The woman with whom Mr. Giuliani was having an affair, Judith Nathan, who became his third wife, had a condominium in the Long Island beach community.

Who played "the wife" during sex?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, November 28, 2007
Last one out, turn off the lights
posted by Wally
7:42 AM

Rat. Ship. You know the drill. This time it's Bush's top economic advisor and former classmate bailing out.
Al Hubbard, director of President George W. Bush's National Economic Council, will step down by the end of the year, two administration officials said today.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson will gain clout as a result of Hubbard's departure and pursue more pragmatic economic policies, including those dealing with the credit crisis, said Peter Morici, a professor of business at the University of Maryland. Hubbard was too ideologically driven, he said.

Hubbard's decision to resign as Bush's top economic adviser follows the departure of several other senior officials, including Homeland Security adviser Frances Fragos Townsend and Karl Rove, Bush's top political adviser.
This time, in a hilarious reversal of roles, a Republican is whining because the Democrats are being mean to him. Hubbard says he's quitting because the mean old Dems aren't just happily going along with all of Bush's oh so successful economic policies. If they're not going to play nice and do whatever the President says - you know, like the Republicans did through the Clinton Presidency - then he's just going to take his toys and go home.

Isn't is fun having 6 year olds running the country? If we can just make it through the next 418 days until they're gone....

And STAY Out!

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:35 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link below to submit your caption of Dubya listening to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.


Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Buh Bye Denny
posted by Wally
8:58 AM

Take one look at Rep. Denny Hastert (R-IL) and you realize that if there's gravy around, he's pushing his way to the trough. So it's no surprise that he's at the front of the Republican parade marching out of Congress and onto the lobbying gravy-train, getting out while the revolving doors are still spinning.

As of Monday night, Denny is no longer a Congresscritter, and available on K-Street.
Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert resigned from Congress on Monday, bringing to an end his nearly 21 years representing the Fox Valley in Washington, D.C.

The 69-year-old Kendall County Republican delivered his final speech on the House floor earlier this month, announcing that he would retire before year's end, though he did not offer specifics. This summer, Hastert announced that he would not seek re-election after his 11th term ends in January 2009.
He says, of course, that it's to spend more time with his family, but I doubt it.

Starting next year, according to new Congressional ethics rules, retiring congressmen will have to wait at least 2 years before moving into the extremely lucrative lobbying world. Currently, they don't even need to wait 2 minutes, leading to some blatant conflicts of interest, such as when Billy Tauzin (R-LA) wrote the Medicare drug law and then immediately quit congress to go work for the drug companies who will benefit from the new law. Then on Monday, Trent Lott (R-MS) suddenly announced that he's giving up his leadership positions to retire before the end of the year, amid suggestions that he too will be taking a high paid position with a lobbying firm.

Until Lott's announcement, I was naive enough to believe that maybe Denny Hastert actually was resigning early due to scandal and embarrassment, and to give the Republicans a better chance of winning his open seat because Illinois will have to hold a special election (rather than the GOP having their asses handed to them in the general election).
In his letter to Blagojevich, Hastert said that he had been advised to resign by Monday to allow Blagojevich time to call the special primary on Feb. 5, the same day as the scheduled primary. "This will minimize inconvenience to the voters and expense to the counties in the 14th Congressional District," Hastert wrote.
After seeing Lott's statement, however, I've changed my assessment. Denny is just smarter and/or faster than Lott - and how embarrassing is it to be slower than fat-Denny?

Any bets on how long until he's collecting a K-Street paycheck fat enough to be commensurate with his ass?

Good riddance

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Answer: "very nice, very cordial" Question: What's a polite way to call someone a "douchebag"?
posted by Wally
7:59 AM

Finally, Al Gore found himself in the Oval Office. Unfortunately, he was just there to visit the guy who stole the election from him, and not to take over his rightful position there.
The occasion was an annual tradition, the presidential photo opportunity with Nobel Prize winners. But Gore, who shared the Nobel Peace Prize for his work on the environment, was given special treatment: a private tête-à-tête with Bush, which lasted more than 30 minutes, provoking intense speculation about just what the two men talked about.

"Of course, we talked about global warming - the whole time," Gore, the former vice president, said as he and his wife, Tipper, emerged onto Pennsylvania Avenue, where they were mobbed by reporters and photographers.

No surprise there. Gore, whose documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth," won an Academy Award, is a staunch critic of the Bush administration's environmental policy. "He's constantly looking for opportunities to make an impact on this issue," said Michael Feldman, an adviser, "so being invited to the political center of the universe is a great thing for him."

"It was a private meeting," he said, "and I'm not going to say anything about it other than that it was very nice, very cordial. He was very gracious in setting up the meeting, and it was a very good and very substantive conversation. That's all."
Translation: Bush is as much of a tool as everyone thinks he is, and was too busy playing with his Wii to pay attention to anything he didn't want to hear - like "science" or "fact-based" reality. Imagine Al Gore trying to explain complex concept to Dubya - something difficult to comprehend, like "temperature" - being faced with that glazed-over Alfred E. Neumann blank stare, and realizing he'd be more successful talking to Barney.

Dammit Al, why didn't you run?

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

More Massive Bellyflops From The Republican Netroots
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:56 AM



The National Republican Campaign Committee recently held a contest to find the best pro-Republican YouTube videos. They promised to post the top-five videos submitted onto their site where the public could vote on the best one.

Then the deadline passed and the Republicans ran into a bit of a problem. Only five videos were submitted. The one posted above is one of them.

Will the Republicans honor their word to put the top five videos up for the public to vote on? Would you not love to see this made the official Republican "netroots" video?

Dumbazz's

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

All that bacon almost finally paid off
posted by Wally
7:21 AM

For the past 3 years we've been asking you to send bacon to Cheney. It almost paid off yesterday when doctors found that he had an irregular heartbeat and admitted him for treatment. After spending several hours searching for his heart - one that makes the Grinch's heart (before it grew 3 sizes) point and laugh at how small it is - they hit it with shock treatment to jumpstart it. Or maybe they were "rebooting" him. Either way, it's an encouraging sign that tbe bacon is working.
Doctors administered an electrical shock to Vice President Dick Cheney's heart and restored it to a normal rhythm during a 2 1/2 -hour hospital visit yesterday.

Cheney, who has a history of heart problems, was discovered to have an irregular heartbeat about 7 a.m. when he was seen by doctors at the White House for a lingering cough from a cold. He remained at work throughout the day, joining President Bush in meetings with Mideast leaders.

The irregular heartbeat was determined to be atrial fibrillation, an abnormal rhythm involving the upper chambers of the heart, said spokeswoman Megan Mitchell. He went to the hospital about 5 p.m. and was discharged about 7:30 p.m.

"He'll probably have other episodes," said Eldadah, who is not involved in Cheney's care. "Atrial fibrillation in and of itself is not threatening. The problem is that it has long term consequences. It increases the risk of stroke." He said Cheney probably would be put on the most potent blood thinner.
Are blood-thinners bad for vampires?

So close...

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, November 26, 2007
Republican economics...
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:29 PM

Reckoning: The Economic Consequences Of Mr. Bush

When we look back someday at the catastrophe that was the Bush administration, we will think of many things: the tragedy of the Iraq war, the shame of Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, the erosion of civil liberties. The damage done to the American economy does not make front-page headlines every day, but the repercussions will be felt beyond the lifetime of anyone reading this page...

...Bill Clinton had left President Bush in an ideal position to pursue such policies. Remember the presidential debates in 2000 between Al Gore and George Bush, and how the two men argued over how to spend America's anticipated $2.2 trillion budget surplus? The country could well have afforded to ramp up domestic investment in key areas. In fact, doing so would have staved off recession in the short run while spurring growth in the long run.

But the Bush administration had its own ideas. The first major economic initiative pursued by the president was a massive tax cut for the rich, enacted in June of 2001. Those with incomes over a million got a tax cut of $18,000-more than 30 times larger than the cut received by the average American. The inequities were compounded by a second tax cut, in 2003, this one skewed even more heavily toward the rich. Together these tax cuts, when fully implemented and if made permanent, mean that in 2012 the average reduction for an American in the bottom 20 percent will be a scant $45, while those with incomes of more than $1 million will see their tax bills reduced by an average of $162,000...

...In breathtaking disregard for the most basic rules of fiscal propriety, the administration continued to cut taxes even as it undertook expensive new spending programs and embarked on a financially ruinous "war of choice" in Iraq. A budget surplus of 2.4 percent of gross domestic product (G.D.P.), which greeted Bush as he took office, turned into a deficit of 3.6 percent in the space of four years. The United States had not experienced a turnaround of this magnitude since the global crisis of World War II.

Fiscally Conservative?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
8:23 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya hugging members of Virginia tribes after giving his Thanksgiving speech in Charles City, VA.

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Trent Lott to Bail on Senate - There's More Money on the Lobbying Gravy Train
posted by Wally
7:37 AM

Sen. Trent Lott to resign
NBC News: Minority whip would leave Senate before end of the year
NBC News has learned that Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., the minority whip is in the midst of informing close allies that he plans to resign his senate seat before the end of the year. It's possible a formal announcement of his plans could take place as early as today.
Now what would cause someone as powerful as Trent Lott - the number 2 Republican in the Senate - to step down. More telling, what would cause him to resign a year early, before his term is up and he is facing re-election? It could be that we're about to find out some really good dirt about his private life - although looking at the likes of Tom Delay and David "diaper-Dave" Vitter - ethical violations and criminal activity don't seem to have much impact within the Republican party.
While the exact reason Lott is stepping down before he finishes his term is unknown, the general speculation is that a quick departure immunizes Lott against tougher restrictions in a new lobbying law that takes effect at the end of the year. That law would require Senators to wait two-years before entering the lucrative world of lobbying Congress.
That explains it. He's a Republican, so more than service to country, or duty, or patriotism or loyalty or integrity, it's all about the money flowing into his pocket.

Good Riddance

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, November 25, 2007
Gee, isn't that what the Constitution mandates?
posted by Clyde
8:23 AM

Lawmaker wants stronger say in declaring war

Rep. William Delahunt says it's high time to start thinking about the next war.

Even as Congress wrestles with attempts to bring home U.S. troops from Iraq, the Massachusetts Democrat is teaming up with some Republican colleagues on legislation to give Congress a stronger say in when the country should go to war.

Delahunt recently joined Republican Reps. Walter Jones of North Carolina, Wayne Gilchrest of Maryland and 2008 presidential candidate Ron Paul of Texas on a measure that would limit the president's ability to go to war without Congress' approval.

The resolution would prohibit the president from ordering military action without congressional approval unless the U.S. or its troops were attacked, or if U.S. citizens abroad need to be protected or evacuated.

(Link)

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Nation building goes awry
posted by Clyde
7:57 AM

U.S. Notes Limited Progress in Afghan War
Strategic Goals Unmet, White House Concludes

A White House assessment of the war in Afghanistan has concluded that wide-ranging strategic goals that the Bush administration set for 2007 have not been met, even as U.S. and NATO forces have scored significant combat successes against resurgent Taliban fighters, according to U.S. officials.

The evaluation this month by the National Security Council followed an in-depth review in late 2006 that laid out a series of projected improvements for this year, including progress in security, governance and the economy. But the latest assessment concluded that only "the kinetic piece" -- individual battles against Taliban fighters -- has shown substantial progress, while improvements in the other areas continue to lag, a senior administration official said.

This judgment reflects sharp differences between U.S. military and intelligence officials on where the Afghan war is headed. Intelligence analysts acknowledge the battlefield victories, but they highlight the Taliban's unchallenged expansion into new territory, an increase in opium poppy cultivation and the weakness of the government of President Hamid Karzai as signs that the war effort is deteriorating.

The contrasting views echo repeated internal disagreements over the Iraq war: While the military finds success in a virtually unbroken line of tactical achievements, intelligence officials worry about a looming strategic failure.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, November 24, 2007
Could this be the beginning?
posted by Clyde
8:22 AM

U.S. Navy steps up fuel deliveries to Gulf forces

The U.S. military has stepped up chartering of tankers and requests for extra fuel in the U.S. Central Command area, which includes the Gulf, shipping and oil industry sources say.

A Gulf oil industry source said the charters suggested there would be high naval activity, possibly including a demonstration to Iran that the U.S. Navy will protect the Strait of Hormuz oil shipping route during tensions over Tehran's nuclear programme.

The U.S. Navy's Military Sealift Command (MSC) has tendered for four tankers in November to move at least one million barrels of jet and ship fuel between Gulf ports, from Asia to the Gulf and to the Diego Garcia base, tenders seen by Reuters show.

It usually tenders for one or two tankers a month to supply Gulf operations, which include missions in Iraq.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Another loss for the war mongers
posted by Clyde
8:16 AM

Howard concedes defeat in Australian elections

Opposition leader Kevin Rudd greeted jubilant supporters Saturday night, as he promised changes in environmental, education and workplace policies as Australia's new prime minister.

"I will be a prime minister for all Australians," he told the cheering crowd. "Let us be the generation that seizes the opportunity of today to invest in the Australia of tomorrow. That's the mission statement we have as the next government of this country."

He added, "I want to do it with all of us working together."

Rudd, 50, is the head of Australia's center-left Labor Party. Earlier Saturday, conservative Prime Minister John Howard officially conceded that the Labor Party had gained a majority of seats in parliament and would replace his center-right Liberal-National coalition as the government.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, November 23, 2007
These are our friends and allies?
posted by Wally
10:03 AM

The Bush family has long maintained close ties with the Saudi royal family, and Dubya continues to call the Saudi's allies and friends despite all the evidence to the contrary. While he may never have given a backrub to any of them, he is seen often enough holding hands with them.


(click picture for larger image from the White House website)

The fact that 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 came from Saudi Arabia never phased him. Nor did the fact that the mastermind of the Cole bombing was a Saudi. Or that at least 15 of the 19 people indicted in the Khobar Towers bombing were Saudis. At least 3 of those responsible for the 1998 Embassy bombings were Saudis. In spite of all of that, Bush has never stopped holding hands with the Saudi's, even while invading their neighbors.

Meanwhile, the Bush administration has been ramping up the rhetoric about invading Iran because they are probably interested in developing nukes some time in the future and 2) they are sending fighters into Iraq to help the insurgency. While the first of those is problematic - regardless of which nation - anyone developing nukes is a legitimate concern, the latter issue only serves to highlight the Middle East hypocricy regarding the Saudis.
More than 40% of the foreign fighters who entered Iraq to join the insurgency in the past year were citizens of Saudi Arabia, America's key partner in the Middle East, according to detailed information seized from a camp used by them. Documents and computers found by the US army at Sinjar, on the Iraqi-Syrian border, revealed that the other single largest group came from Libya, which is now being rehabilitated as a reliable western ally.
So, the two greatest sources of foreign insurgents in Iraq come from our "allies"? And we still call them our allies why?
The captured data has been described as an intelligence treasure trove that included biographical details and the hometowns of the more than 700 fighters who entered Iraq since August 2006. Of those 307, or 41%, were Saudis and 137, or 18%, Libyans, senior US military sources told the New York Times.
41%, that's higher than Bush's approval rating. Maybe that's why he likes them.
The documents, found in September, showed that the third-largest source of foreign fighters was Yemen, with 68, followed by Algeria, 64, Morocco, 50, Tunisia, 38, Jordan, 14, Turkey, six, and Egypt, two. These figures seem to corroborate suggestions of a worrying increase in jihadi activity across north Africa, where armed groups from Libya, Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco have united under the banner of al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb.
While I don't believe that there are zero Iranians fighting against us in Iraq, I find it strange that Bush and Cheney want to invade them, but have nothing but love and kisses for the Saudis, who are number one on that, and so many other "terror" lists.

What could possibly be the motivation for this Overwhelming Insane Loyalty?

Why does Bush love terrorists?

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:30 AM

Looks like Dubya finally found something he's qualified to do. Come up with a caption or a slogan for him to use as spokesman for Bush's baked beans.


Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, November 22, 2007
Money with a conscience
posted by Clyde
5:30 AM

The future of the corporation

LAST WEEK, superinvestor Warren Buffett, America's second richest man, testified before the Senate Finance Committee on the subject of why people like him can well afford to pay taxes. In fact, Buffett is ceasing to be among the very wealthiest because he is giving most of his fortune away to philanthropies while he is still alive.

"Dynastic wealth, the enemy of a meritocracy, is on the rise," Buffett told the senators. "Equality of opportunity has been on the decline. A progressive and meaningful estate tax is needed to curb the movement of a democracy toward a plutocracy."

Buffett also proposed higher taxes on the wealthy in order to give working people a break on their payroll taxes, which now cost three Americans in four more than they pay in income taxes. And he supports taxing hedge fund bonuses at the same rate as ordinary income, so that billionaire hedge fund managers don't pay taxes at a lower rate than the people who clean their offices.

The conservatives on the committee were somewhat nonplussed, since Buffett is a poster boy for capitalist entrepreneurship. He isn't supposed to hold such views. And indeed, few Americans of great wealth do.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Republicans don't win elections, they have to steal them
posted by Clyde
5:22 AM

Opponents of California Ballot Initiative Seek Inquiry

The chairman of a committee formed to fight a ballot initiative to change how California's electoral college votes are apportioned has asked the city attorney here to investigate a report that a group collecting signatures for the initiative has offered food to homeless people in exchange for signing the petitions.

The Republican-supported initiative would replace California's winner-take-all system of allocating its 55 electoral college votes with one that allots the votes by Congressional district.

(snip)

Mr. Steyer's letter, dated Nov. 19, stems from an article in The Los Angeles Downtown News that detailed reporters' observations of signature gatherers asking homeless people on the city's notorious Skid Row for their signatures to help qualify the electoral vote initiative and three others, as well as asking them to fill out voter registration cards.

In exchange, the paper reported, homeless people and those in nearby shelters were given Snickers bars, instant noodles and other snack foods.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, November 21, 2007
How Bush's Pentagon Supports the Troops
posted by Wally
3:36 PM

By making them pay back their "Signing Bonus" if they fail to complete their tour of service due to things like bullet wounds, missing limbs, brain damage, etc. You can't make this shit up. Nobody is heartless and evil enough to pull shit like this, with the exception of Pentagon policy-makers and ditto-head freepers supporting the troops by slapping yellow ribbons on the back of their SUVs.
Jordan Fox received a $10,000 signing bonus when he joined the Army. The Mt. Lebanon man served his country in Iraq, where as a sniper he survived machine gun battles and a roadside bomb that knocked him unconscious and blinded him in his right eye.

The injury forced the military to send him home. A few weeks later, Fox received a bill from the Department of Defense, saying he owes the military nearly $3,000 from his original enlistment bonus because he couldn't fulfill three months of his commitment.

This is apparently not an isolated bureaucratic foul-up. The military is allegedly demanding that thousands of wounded service personnel give back signing bonuses because they are unable to serve out their commitments.

To get people to sign up, the military gives enlistment bonuses - up to $30,000 in some cases. Now men and women who have lost arms, legs, eyesight, hearing and can no longer serve are being ordered to pay some of that money back.
Aside from being a purely evil thing to do, what the fuck are these military bureaucrats and policy-makers thinking? Do they think soldiers are going to still be enticed to re-up in order to get a signing bonus that they'll have to repay if they get shot up or blown up? Do they think kids are going to sign up based on this?

I know a lot of high ranking military leaders have resigned or been forced out because of Bush, Cheney and Rummy Axis of Idiocy, but are the remaining leaders really that fucking stupid to think this is a good way to cut expenses? If so, let's bring our front line soldiers back home and put them in charge, and put the Caseys and Patreauses on the front line. Let them take the bombs and bullets. They make much more money and much higher bonuses, so the military will save even more money when they have to pay them back.

Support the Troops. Bring them home. In one piece.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

What are the conservatives most interested in?
posted by Wally
9:17 AM

For those of you who may not have heard of it, Conservapedia is just like Wikipidia, except without that pesky "unbiased, fact-based" slant that Wiki for the most part adheres to. If you're a freeper, neo-con, or ditto-head, Conservapedia is the place to go for rightwing information.

So what is it that these good upstanding god-fearing family-values pro-life christian patriots are most interested in? According to Conservapedia's own statistics, the top 10 most viewed pages are:

Larry Craig must be proud.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Pop Quiz: 77 = a) Bush's IQ. b) Percent of Americans worried about the country. C) All of the above
posted by Wally
7:31 AM

According to a recent survey, most Americans are happy in their personal lives, but over 3/4 are worried about the country.
Most in the U.S. say they are personally happy and feel in control of their lives and finances, according to an extensive Associated Press-Yahoo! News survey on the mood of voters. Beneath the surface, though, personal and political discontent is bubbling.

There is a widespread unease—shared by 77 percent - that the country has meandered off in the wrong direction. Nearly all Democrats and more than six in 10 Republicans think the country has taken the wrong course. And although almost half express interest and hope in the upcoming elections, a third voice frustration—particularly Republicans

Stirred in are warning signs for Republican candidates: Democrats seething after nearly seven years under President Bush are happier and more psyched up about this election than Republicans.

More Democrats than Republicans say they are hopeful about the voting, 54 percent to 39 percent, and more of them are interested in it. Republicans are more likely to say the election leaves them frustrated and bored.
1/20/2009

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:27 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link below to submit your caption of this turkey and the bird he's looking at.


Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Freedom Watch spent $15 Million selling "the surge" to the American people. Now they're test marketing a new "Invade Iran" campaign
posted by Wally
8:09 AM

Like Yogi Berra said, "it's like deja vu all over again". The administration sold us the Iraq invasion the same way advertising firms sell us the idea that "Coke adds life" or that wearing Axe will make you irresistable to women - using focus groups and massive marketing campaigns with no regard for the truth. Since it worked so well there, of course they're using the same techniques again to sell us on their next adventure.
The hawkish advocacy group (Freedom Watch) recently rolled out a multi-million dollar ad blitz in support of the troop surge in Iraq. It's now test marketing language that could be used to sell a war with Iran.

Laura Sonnenmark is a focus group regular. "I've been asked to talk about orange juice, cell phone service, furniture," the Fairfax County, Virginia-based children's book author and Democratic Party volunteer says. But when she was called by a focus group organizer for a prospective assignment earlier this month, she was told the questions this time would be about something "political."

On the appointed day, she drove to the offices of Martin Focus Groups in Alexandria, Virginia, knowing she would be paid $150 for two hours of her time. After joining a half dozen other women in a conference room, she found, to her surprise, that she had been called in to help some of the country's most prominent hawks test-market language that could be used to sell a war against Iran to the American public. "The whole basis of the whole thing was, 'we're going to go into Iran and what do we have to do to get you guys to along with it,'" Sonnenmark, 49, tells Mother Jones.

The client paying for the focus group session, according to Sonnemark, was Freedom's Watch, a high-powered, well-connected advocacy group that launched a $15 million ad campaign this summer in support of the surge of American troops in Iraq. Among the group's leadership: former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer and Bradley A. Blakeman, a former deputy assistant to President Bush. The focus group session suggests that Freedom's Watch may be looking beyond Iraq and expanding its mission to building support for military action against Iran.
Anyone paying attention shouldn't be surprised by this, but what is most frightening is the idea that the American people might very well be gullible enough to fall for it again. We know Congress is that stupid, but will we, as Americans, allow them to let it happen? Will the media finally stand up and do their jobs and inform the general populace of what's really going on? Unfortunately, I doubt it.

War begins with Dubya

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Snotty Scotty Comes Clean
posted by Wally
7:42 AM

Scott McClellan's Book Coming in April -- Admits Wrongdoing in Clearing Rove and Libby in CIA Leak Case

To no one's surprise in a world where top White House aides with any president eventually write a book about it, former Press Sectetary Scott McClellan will be coming out with his volume in April.

"The most powerful leader in the world had called upon me to speak on his behalf and help restore credibility he lost amid the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. So I stood at the White house briefing room podium in front of the glare of the klieg lights for the better part of two weeks and publicly exonerated two of the senior-most aides in the White House: Karl Rove and Scooter Libby.

"There was one problem. It was not true.

"I had unknowingly passed along false information. And five of the highest ranking officials in the administration were involved in my doing so: Rove, Libby, the vice President, the President's chief of staff, and the president himself."
For his admitted complicity in lying the country into an illegal war and obstructing the investigation into this lying, what will his punishment be? He's going to make millions off of his book and speaking tours, of course. That'll sure be a great deterrent for the next guy. The only ones who will ever pay any price for the crimes of this administration will be the innocents who were victimized by it.

On the other hand, after having the temerity to come clean and expose the truth about these guys, I would advise Scotty to watch his back and avoid flying in small planes.

LIARS

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, November 19, 2007
Despite the lack of balls, Dems are still popular.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:55 PM

Democratic Party's Image More Positive Than GOP's

According to the latest USA Today/Gallup poll, Americans are much more positive in their assessments of the Democratic Party than of the Republican Party -- consistent with a trend Gallup has measured since April 2006. Over the past several months, the public's ratings of the Republican Party have grown slightly more positive. The vast majority of Republicans and Democrats rate their respective parties favorably, while independents have a more positive than negative view of the Democratic Party, and a more negative than positive view of the Republican Party.

One more year!

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

I feel safer already
posted by Wally
7:43 AM

Every time another one of Dubya's appointees abandons ship, it makes me feel a little better about the state of the nation. I'd rather go without a government - let things slip into anarchy, chaos, and pandemonium - than have the Bush/Cheney people snooping through my email, credit records, phone calls, medical records, etc, whittling away at my Constitutionally guaranteed rights and freedoms, and having their thugs taze me and haul me away for questioning why these rights are being violated.

This time is especially comforting, since it's Bush's top advisor on Homeland Security who is bailing out. My homeland feels more secure in her absence.
Fran Townsend, President Bush's top White House-based adviser on terrorism and homeland security, has resigned, it was announced Monday.

Her departure continues an exodus of key Bush aides and confidants, with his two-term presidency in the final 15 months. Top aide Karl Rove, along with press secretary Tony Snow and senior presidential adviser Dan Bartlett, left earlier this year.
Like a hurricane alley resident watching "Brownie" resign, or a soldier hearing about Rummy walking out, or an attorney seeing Gonzo being shoved out the door, I feel a reprieve from the ineptitude and cronyism, if only temporarily. I suspect that they'll be replaced with another incompetent retarded Bush loyalist, but at least there is the brief interlude when there is a vacuum - when nobody is there to fuck things up even worse than they already are.

Rat. Ship. You know the drill.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:38 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption.

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

4 years later
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:37 AM

U.S. struggles to restore Iraq water

The water tankers arrive twice a week in this parched village surrounded by fallow fields stretching into the horizon. The town's wells still pump out a flow, but few villagers dare drink from it unless in desperation.

At the gate of Kayria Fayhan's home, 250 gallons of the trucked-in cargo fill a metal tank for cooking and drinking, sometimes for washing up if itching from the groundwater becomes unbearable.

Even the "clean" water from the tanker is a gamble on some weeks. "They say the water is clean, but sometimes the water is green," Fayhan said. "Sometimes, there's rust floating in it."

Despite the fact that Iraq and U.S. officials have made water projects among their top priorities, the percentage of Iraqis without access to decent water supplies has risen from 50 percent to 70 percent since the start of the U.S.-led war, according to an analysis by Oxfam International last summer. The portion of Iraqis lacking decent sanitation was even worse -- 80 percent.

Stay the course!!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, November 18, 2007
But at least they had their freedom right?
posted by Clyde
7:36 AM

Suffer the Children - Number of children dying higher than when the country was under sanctions.

Child mortality in Iraq has spiralled because of the tense security situation, deteriorating health services and lack of medical supplies, say experts.

According to a report released in May 2007 by aid agency Save the Children, "Iraq's child mortality rate has increased by a staggering 150 per cent since 1990, more than any other country."

The report, entitled State of the World's Mothers 2007, said that some 122,000 Iraqi children - the equivalent of one in eight - died in 2005, before reaching their fifth birthday. More than half of the deaths were among newborn babies in their first month of life.

"Even before the latest war, Iraqi mothers and children were facing a grave humanitarian crisis caused by years of repression, conflict and external sanctions," said the report.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Another rat to jump ship
posted by Clyde
7:31 AM

Poland to end Iraq mission in 2008: defence minister

Poland will end next year its mission in Iraq, where it currently deploys 900 soldiers, new Polish Defence Minister Bogdan Klich said Saturday.

"I can confirm that in 2008 the Polish military contingent in Iraq will be withdrawn," the minister, who took up his post in the new liberal government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk on Friday, told public radio Jedynma.

He said the details of the withdrawal would be announced next Friday when Tusk outlines his government's policies in parliament.

Warsaw has been one of the closest US allies over Iraq. Polish troops took part in the 2003 invasion, sparking a bitter verbal battle with anti-war European Union members, notably France.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Victims without recourse
posted by Clyde
7:04 AM

As Owners Feel Mortgage Pain, So Do Renters

In the foreclosure crisis of 2007, thousands of American families are losing their homes without ever missing a payment. They are renters in houses whose owners default on their mortgages - a large but little noticed class of casualties.

Some live in big apartments, others in houses owned by small investors who got in over their heads.

There are no exact figures for how many renters have been evicted because of foreclosures, but a survey taken this year by the Mortgage Bankers Association found that one in eight foreclosures was non-owner-occupied. This figure probably underestimates the problem, according to the association, because buildings receive tax benefits if they are registered as owner-occupied. More than one million properties are expected to enter foreclosure this year.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, November 17, 2007
Pervez plays Condi
posted by Clyde
7:35 AM

Pakistan's Musharraf warns on nuclear weapons

President Pervez Musharraf, defending his decision to declare emergency rule, has said Pakistan's nuclear weapons could fall into the wrong hands if elections led to disturbances.

The comments, in a BBC interview broadcast on Saturday, come as U.S. envoy John Negroponte visited Pakistan to put pressure on Musharraf to revoke the two-week-old emergency, make peace with opposition leader Benazir Bhutto and hold fair elections.

Musharraf said that if elections were held in a "disturbed environment", it could bring in dangerous elements who might pose a risk to control of Pakistan's nuclear weapons.

"They cannot fall into the wrong hands, if we manage ourselves politically. The military is there -- as long as the military is there, nothing happens to the strategic assets, we are in charge and nobody does anything with them," he said.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Booming economy alert - Lenders leery on loans
posted by Clyde
7:06 AM

Economist: $2 trillion lending crunch may be ahead

The mortgage wipeout could result in a $2 trillion cutback in lending and have dramatic implications for the U.S. economy, according to Wall Street investment bank Goldman Sachs.

The housing slump is expected to end up costing banks, hedge funds and other lenders an estimated $400 billion as defaults on home loans rise, according to Goldman economist Jan Hatzius.

A $400 billion loss is equal to just about 2.5 percent of U.S. stock market capitalization - or a bad day on Wall Street, he wrote in a commentary on Thursday.

But most stock investors don't react aggressively to capital losses the way banks and other lenders do. A bank that aims to maintain a capital ratio of 10 percent would need to shrink its balance sheet by $10 for every $1 in credit losses, the note said.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, November 16, 2007
Reid to Keep Senate in Session to Prevent Recess Appointments
posted by Wally
2:18 PM

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has decided to keep the chamber in session over the Thanksgiving break to block President Bush from making any unsavory recess appointments while Senators are out of town.

In a statement inserted in the record Friday, the Majority Leader said he will hold the Senate in a series of pro forma or nonvoting sessions to prevent the controversial practice. In the statement, Reid argued that nominations need to get on track, and that Bush has not met the Democrats "halfway" in agreeing to Democratically backed nominees to "important commissions."

(snip)

"With the Thanksgiving break looming, the administration informed me that they would make several recess appointments," Reid said.
Congress doesn't deserve recess anyway

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
8:07 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya with German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Permalink :: 13 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Congress approves the Constitution for a change
posted by Clyde
6:46 AM

Who'd a thunk it? Congress actually passes legislation that protects Americans.

Under bill, companies could face privacy suits

Congress appeared headed toward a confrontation with President Bush on Thursday over House and Senate plans to require that telecommunication firms that aided the administration's warrantless surveillance program be subject to lawsuits from American customers.

The House of Representatives approved Thursday night a Democrat-sponsored foreign surveillance bill that would block retroactive immunity from lawsuits for telecoms that facilitated wiretapping or shared customer information with the federal government from the Sept. 11 attacks until this past January. The bill passed 227-189.

Bush has promised to veto any measure that does not include such immunity. In a statement, the White House said, "House Democrats passed legislation that would dangerously weaken our ability to protect the Nation from foreign threats."

"The House Democrat's bill to reauthorize the Protect America Act (PAA) fails to give our intelligence community the tools it needs, and it fails to protect companies facing massive lawsuits for allegedly stepping up and answering the nation's call for help after the 9/11 terrorist attacks," the statement read.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Democrats emerge from primordial ooze and begin development on a spine?
posted by Clyde
6:25 AM

It's almost like watching monkeys use tools for the first time!

Congress to hold off on Iraq war money

Congress likely will hold off on sending President Bush money for Iraq until early next year, pushing the Pentagon to the brink of an accounting nightmare and deepening Democrats' conflict with the White House on the war.

Democrats say the tough approach is needed.

"Everybody knows that the president is stuck in his place, a place where he wants a 10-year war," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said.

This week, the House passed, 218-203, a $50 billion bill that would pay for combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan - about one-fourth of the amount Bush wants - but require that troops start coming home. The measure sets a goal of ending combat by Dec. 15, 2008.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, November 15, 2007
Those dirty dirty Republicans
posted by Wally
1:59 PM

The way the hits just keep on coming, I'm starting to feel like we're running a sex scandal sheet around here lately. And it makes me feel all icky.

This time they're calling Sen "Diaper-David" Vitter (R-LA) to testify in the DC Madam case.
The "D.C. Madam" served a subpoena Tuesday on Sen. David Vitter, R-La., requiring him to testify about his use of the Washington, D.C., escort service federal prosecutors say was a prostitution ring.


The subpoena calls on the freshman senator to testify at a federal court hearing Nov. 28 looking into the business operations of the $2 million escort service Deborah Jeane Palfrey operated in the nation's capital for 13 years.

Vitter has acknowledged being a client of Palfrey's company, Pamela Martin & Associates, and his telephone number appeared six times in the firm's phone records between 1999 and 2001, when he was a member of the House of Representatives. He was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2004.
Another Republican gets his day in court - his chance to explain, under oath and under penalty of perjury, exactly what it was that he was doing with Ms. Paltrey's escorts. Whether it was illegal or not, it will still be fun to watch.

They impeached Clinton for getting a simple straight-forward, heterosexual, consensual blowjob, and he didn't even have to pay for it. Vitter repeatedly went to a prostitute and paid her to put him in diapers (and I don't even want to know what else) - but that's okay. Larry Craig was caught trying to tap-dance his way into strange men's pants in the airport bathroom - but that's not a problem. They did nothing wrong and are just being persecuted by the liberal media. That's all you need to know about Republican family values.

I feel dirty just writing about these guys. I think I need a shower.

GOP=Greedy Old Perverts

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

With Larry Craig, guys got blown. Rep McHenry (R-NC) upped the ante - guys got blown, and blown away
posted by Wally
8:41 AM

The best part about this is that it's in the "North Carolina Conservative" - who's tag line is "God : Country : Common Sense". Not exactly what you'd call a "liberal media" outlet.
JUDGED BY THE COMPANY YOU KEEP?


The North Carolina Conservative first reported last week that Congressman Patrick McHenry had ties to persons involved in a double murder/suicide in Florida. Sources told us that one of the men killed was Ralph Gonzalez, a gay Republican political consultant, an associate of McHenry who "helped on his campaign." The same source told us that the shooter, Robert Drake who is reportedly connected with a gay escort service and another murder in Virginia, was "tight with McHenry and ran elections for him." McHenry's office has reportedly admitted that the congressman had an unspecified relationship with Drake.

(snip)

As the old saying goes, "you are judged by the company you keep." Patrick McHenry has been keeping some very strange company indeed. Perhaps it is time that he come home before a major scandal develops that could embarrass the 10th District of North Carolina and damage the Republican Party.
The full article is loaded with fun information about Rep. McHenry. This guy is a real piece of work. A glowing representative of the "moral majority".

Hypocrite

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Guantanamo operating manual posted on Internet
posted by Wally
7:56 AM

If you want to know what you'll be facing if you are caught doing something deemed unAmerican and unpatriotic by the Bush administration (like reading this type of website, for instance), now you can find out with a click of your mouse. The 238 page Gitmo operating manual can now be found on Wikileaks.org. Get your copy while it's hot - or at least before it's taken down and classified by Dubya. (on edit, it might already be blocked - I can't open Wikileaks this morning).

The manual has such fun little tidbits of information as:
Incoming prisoners are to be held in near-isolation for the first two weeks to foster dependence on interrogators and "enhance and exploit the disorientation and disorganization felt by a newly arrived detainee in the interrogation process."

Styrofoam cups must be confiscated if prisoners have written on them, apparently because prisoners have used cups to pass notes to other captives. "If the cup is damaged or destroyed, the detainee will be disciplined for destruction of government property," the rules say.

It contains instructions as only the military can write them, such as how to use pepper spray on unruly prisoners. "Aim at the eyes, nose and mouth when possible. Use a 1/2 to 1 second burst from a distance of 36 to 72 inches away."

The manual spells out in minute detail how captives should be shackled, searched and moved and how the chains should be collected afterward.
Perhaps the most damning bit of information, however, is that "some prisoners were designated as off limits to visitors from the International Committee of the Red Cross, something the military has repeatedly denied." Also something that is expressly forbidden by the Geneva Convention. I'm sure this will be some fun reading for those groups and countries intent on capturing American troops and civilians.

But remember, we don't torture. Depending, of course, on how narrowly and specifically you define torture.

Gitmo Rules!

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Spoiled brat with a credit card
posted by Wally
2:52 PM

Report Puts Hidden War Costs at $1.6 Trillion


That's over $5,000 for every American man woman and child.
Bush literally "blew" over $5 grand of YOUR money. Or should I say he literally "blew it up".

Yet he has the balls to call Democrats "college kids with credit cards"? Come to think of it, that might be apt, since at least they want to spend money on things like education. All Dubya wants to spend it on is pyrotechnics. And guess who gets to pay back the bills on his fun. You and your kids and grandkids and great-grandkids. Unless, that is, our nation goes tits up and we all find ourselves speaking Chinese and making lead painted toys to sell to kids in the remaining "first world" nations that can afford to buy them.

The economic costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are estimated to total $1.6 trillion - roughly double the amount the White House has requested thus far, according to a new report by Democrats on Congress' Joint Economic Committee.

The $1.6 trillion figure, for the period from 2002 to 2008, translates into a cost of $20,900 for a family of four, the report said. The Bush administration has requested $804 billion for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined, the report stated.

For the Iraq war only, total economic costs were estimated at $1.3 trillion for the period from 2002 to 2008. That would cost a family of four $16,500, the report said.

Future economic costs would be even greater. The report estimated that both wars would cost $3.5 trillion between 2003 and 2017. Under that scenario, it would cost a family of four $46,400, the report said.
$1.6 Trillion comes to over $58,000 for every Iraqi man woman and child. We could have bought a very nice house, with high def satellite tv and air conditioning for every single Iraqi family. Then we could have paid for excellent schools so every Iraqi child could get an education, and probably paid for their medical care too.

Instead, what we got for our money is 3,863 dead and 28,451 wounded US soldiers, 100's of 1,000's of dead and millions of wounded Iraqi civilians, and millions of Iraqi refugees. We got a completely decimated infrastructure that needs to be completely rebuilt - if it can ever be safely rebuilt after our military littered the landscape with thousands of tons of depleted uranium that is now blowing in the radioactive dust covering that nation.

What do you think is the better way to win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people, and get them on our side in the endless "war on terra"? How would the money have been better spent to make us safe?

That being said, could you imagine what the American people, not to mention Pigboy Rush, Falafel-Bill, Ann-thrax, Hann-job-ity, and the crew at FoxNews would have said if Bush tried to convince them to use American tax dollars to pay the loan from China to buy new houses for the entire Iraqi population. Come to think of it, the sonsabitches might have gone along with it, as long as Bush promised that they'd all get FoxNews on their new satellite dishes.

Running up YOUR credit card

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

'Nuff said
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:51 PM

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Oh snap!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:46 PM

This is getting funner and funner to watch:

Huckabee Fires Back at Romney on Immigration

Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee is firing back at fellow contender Mitt Romney over questions about illegal immigration.

Huckabee suggests the former Massachusetts governor wants to keep immigrants working on his lawn.

Romney criticized Huckabee over his plans to offer tuition breaks for children of illegal immigrants while serving as governor in Arkansas. Huckabee, appearing on Fox News Channel, said, "I guess Mitt Romney would rather keep people out of college so they can keep working on his lawn."

Mitt-slaped!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Arlen Specter, Gynecologist
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:16 PM

Specter Spends Nearly $1 Mil To Harm Children

I never really thought I'd see anything new from Arlen Specter. He's been in the Senate since Andrew Jackson was president and I figured he'd be content to simply coast in what is possibly his last term.

Whoops! It turns out Arlen Specter has an earmark in a recently vetoed spending bill that spends nearly a million dollars to hurt Pennsylvania children!

Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, secured 25 earmarks providing $882,000 for abstinence education programs around the state.

"There are people who say that abstinence education doesn't work," Mr. Specter said, but "I've seen a lot of indicators that it does work." In addition, he said, "I have 12 million people in Pennsylvania, they have a lot of different ideas," some of them strongly favor abstinence education, and their values "ought to be recognized."
He's seen indicators it does work. I can only assume that means he's traveled the commonwealth checking teenage girls to see if their hymens are still intact. Icky.

Shocker!!_!

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

24%
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
11:09 AM

Voters Unhappy With Bush and Congress


Deepening unhappiness with President George W. Bush and the U.S. Congress soured the mood of Americans and sent Bush's approval rating to another record low this month, according to a Reuters/Zogby poll released on Wednesday.

The Reuters/Zogby Index, which measures the mood of the country, also fell from 98.8 to 96 -- the second consecutive month it has dropped. The number of Americans who believe the country is on the wrong track jumped four points to 66 percent.

Bush's job approval rating fell to 24 percent from last month's record low for a Zogby poll of 29 percent. A paltry 11 percent gave Congress a positive grade, tying last month's record low.

"There is a real question among Americans now about how relevant this government is to them," pollster John Zogby said. "They tell us they want action on health care, education, the war and immigration, but they don't believe they are going to get it."

The base

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush: Blowing people up is more fun than teaching or healing 'em.
posted by Wally
8:22 AM

For the first 6 years of his presiduncy, Dubya didn't veto a single bill handed to him by the Republican controlled Congress, no matter how "porky" it was. Now that the Dems are in control, Dubya finally figured out how to use his veto pen - trying to play the "fiscal responsibility" card.

Nice try dubya, but when you're signing off on a 9% increase for the Pentagon and asking for another 200 billion for the wars you lied us into, it's hard to take you seriously when in the next breath you complain about too much pork in a bill to take care of the things you've been neglecting here at home for the past 6 years.
Bush uses sixth veto to reject health-labor bill

President George W. Bush on Tuesday vetoed a measure to fund education, job training and health programs, marking the sixth veto of his presidency and the latest salvo in a fight with congressional Democrats over domestic spending.

Bush signed a separate bill to give the Pentagon about $460 billion for the fiscal year that began on Oct. 1, even though he was disappointed the military bill had less money than he had sought. Even so, the Pentagon would get about $40 billion more than last year, a 9 percent increase.

The White House said the bill to fund labor and human services was bloated and filled with special projects. The $600 billion measure was about $10 billion more than what Bush requested.
Meantime another major highway bridge in Ohio (and others elsewhere I'm sure) has been found to be in danger of imminent and catastrophic collapse, like the one in Minneapolis. Public schools are struggling to buy supplies and pay teachers. College tuition has gone through the roof. 50 million Americans can't afford to get sick, because they can't afford insurance. Jobs are being sent to China and India - making it even tougher for people to be able to afford college so they can try to get better jobs here....

Every day we see exactly where Dubya's priorities lie, and they are not with the American people.

Override

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:43 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya and Pickles with American Idol singer Melinda Doolittle and the World Children's Choir.

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Water is wet. The sky is blue. Clyde loves beer.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:23 PM

Duh!

POLL: Liberals More Open To Opinions That 'Reflect Values Other Than Their Own'

A new poll by the Norman Lear Center and Zogby International finds that liberals are more open to opposing viewpoints than conservatives, who tend to rely on Fox and Fox News for their entertainment and news. Some highlights from their findings:

- Conservatives were the most "likely to watch only two channels out of the 24 highest-rated networks: Fox and Fox News."

- "Fox News wins the prize for the most politically divisive TV channel (70% of conservatives watch it daily and only 3% of liberals)."

- "While 22% of conservatives said they "never" enjoy entertainment that reflects values other than their own, just 7% of liberals felt the same way. In other words, Limbaugh's potential audience is larger than that of liberal competitors because more liberals say they will listen to conservatives than vice versa."

- Conservatives think "fictional TV shows and movies are politically biased" and "overwhelmingly (76%) believe that TV shows and movies 'very often' contain political messages, but they are the least likely to learn anything about political issues from them. Just 4% say they learn lessons from movies."

Watching too much Fox News may be bad news for conservatives. An April Pew Research Study survey found that viewers of the conservative Fox News channel had the lowest knowledge of national and international affairs.

A recent AP-Ipsos poll also found that liberals read more books than conservatives do. In the past year, 34 percent of conservatives have not read a book within the past year, compared with just 22 percent of liberals and moderates.

But, but, but LIBERAL MEDIA!!1!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Warning shots
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:00 PM

They talk a good game during the primaries and election time but fold when they get inside the beltway. I think it's time for consequences and repercussions:

Anti-War Voters Lash Out at Democrats They Helped Put in Office

When the Democratic Party called up recently to ask Myrna Burgess for a campaign contribution, she answered with an emphatic "no."

"Nothing has been done as far as the war is concerned," said Burgess, 72, an Amtrak worker from Levittown, Pennsylvania.

More than a year after anti-war voters like Burgess helped give Democrats control of Congress, there are more troops in Iraq, lawmakers have approved almost $100 billion in new war spending and congressional approval ratings are at record lows.

Democrats now worry that their inability to make good on campaign promises to end or slow the war in Iraq will have consequences. The disaffection has already fueled at least four anti-war primary challenges to party incumbents, raising fears among some lawmakers of an intra-party fight that could drain momentum before next year's elections.

No balls. No money. No votes
Update: Reid: No new war funds without timetable

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Tuesday that Democrats won't approve more money for the Iraq war this year unless President Bush agrees to begin bringing troops home.

By the end of the week, the House and Senate planned to vote on a $50 billion measure for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The bill would require Bush to initiate troop withdrawals immediately with the goal of ending combat by December 2008.

If Bush vetoes the bill, "then the president won't get his $50 billion," Reid, D-Nev., told reporters at a Capitol Hill news conference.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., made a similar statement last week in a closed-door caucus meeting.
Ten bucks says Pelosi and Reid wet their pants and give Mr. 24% what he wants.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Hypocrisy at its best.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:57 AM

I can't believe President ChuckleNuts has the balls to make statements like this:

Bush pushes budget fight with Democrats

President Bush, escalating his budget battle with Congress, on Tuesday vetoed a spending measure for health and education programs prized by congressional Democrats.

He also signed a big increase in the Pentagon's non-war budget although the White House complained it contained "some unnecessary spending."

The president's action was announced on Air Force One as Bush flew to New Albany, Ind., on the Ohio River across from Louisville, Ky., for a speech criticizing the Democratic-led Congress on its budget priorities.

In excerpts of his remarks released in advance by the White House, Bush hammered Democrats for what he called a tax-and-spend philosophy:

"The Congress now sitting in Washington holds this philosophy," Bush said. "Their majority was elected on a pledge of fiscal responsibility, but so far it is acting like a teenager with a new credit card.
-----

Huge procurement costs are driving the Pentagon budget ever upward. Once war costs are added in, the total defense budget will be significantly higher than during the typical Cold War year, even after adjusting for inflation.

Veto Crayon
So let me get this straight, it's not okay for Democrats to "tax-and-spend?" But it's okay for him and the Repukes to borrow-and-spend? From, oh lets say, China!

What a god-damnned hypocrite!!! Calling "us" a teenager with a new credit card!? Sorry jackass, that's you when you had the Republican Congressional majority for 6 years!

Why do you hate America, Mr. Bush? It's okay to spend billions, if not trillions, in Iraq but not here at home? We have an entire region wiped out by a hurricane, another region destroyed by wildfires, bridges collapsing everywhere, low water supplies in the South-East, etc. Why won't you spend money here? Oh wait, there's not as much oil there as there is in Iraq, right? You just want your glorious photo-op with a bullhorn like 9/11.

No wonder why your dumbass is less popular than Nixon. You keep vetoing bills that are popular with Americans. Flashback

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Honoring our Veterans on Veterans day - by Arresting Them
posted by Wally
7:48 AM

US Veterans Arrested on Veteran's Day, During Veteran's Day Parade

Eighteen people total were arrested in Boston yesterday after holding a peaceful protest during the Boston Veterans Day Parade, sponsored by the American Legion. After being told they could not carry antiwar signs, members of the group Veterans for Peace added gags around their mouths, and clenched tightly to their signs that oppose the Iraq War. The gags were to symbolize the violation of their right to free speech, they said.

"We were exercising our First Amendment rights," one protestor stated. "The First Amendment protects free speech, even when you don't agree with what's being said." When some demonstrators refused to move from the frong of the podium, they were placed in plastic handcuffs and led away, during the Boston Firemen's Band's Marine Hymn.

"Our free speech and civil rights are being abridged here," said a Vietnam veteran who was taken into custody. "We are veterans, too, and we should be allowed to express our opposition to this war."

Police charged all of them - 15 men and 3 women - with Disturbing a Lawful Assembly of People. The Veterans for Peace are notorious for their nonviolence, and the arrests have sparked anger on the day that we were meant to honor our veterans. Notoriously violence-free, their site contains 198 ideas for non-violent action, as well as a full pageful of ways to contact lawmakers and participate in meetings and events peacefully.
They fought to make sure that we can express our opinions and ideas, just as long as our opinions and ideas agree with those in charge, or we stay quietly and securely in our little roped off "free speech zones". These men are still fighting for our country and our freedoms. These men are still heroes.

Show some Respect

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

We're pulling out!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:48 AM

WoooHoo! Yeah! Sweet! Our boys are coming home! WooHoo!

Hey, wait a minute:

U.S. Reversing Troop Surge in Iraq

The first of 30,000 American troops who were part of a surge ordered to Iraq by President Bush in January are being withdrawn, in what observers say will be the first test of the progress Iraqi forces have made in securing their own country.

The 3rd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, operating in volatile Diyala province, is being withdrawn - one of 20 combat brigades currently in Iraq.

Then, between January and July, the force will shrink to 15 brigades. The withdrawal schedule has not yet been made public, for security purposes.

The total number of U.S. troops will likely go from 167,000 now to 140,000-145,000 by July - six months before President Bush leaves office and a new commander-in-chief takes over.

......

More U.S. troops have died in Iraq this year - some 856 - than in any year since the war began. But troop deaths per month have dramatically decreased since summer. Also, Iraqi civilian deaths have declined.

Methinks they were scheduled to come home anyway
Speaking of "The Surge," does anybody remember how long it was supposed to last anyway? 3, 4 months?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Go shopping!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:35 AM

Report: Wars cost average U.S. family $20,000

WASHINGTON - A new study by congressional Democrats says "hidden costs" have driven the price of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to about $1.5 trillion, The Washington Post reported on Tuesday.

That figure is nearly double the $804 billion the White House has spent or requested, according to the report by the Democratic staff of Congress's Joint Economic Committee, which examines the hidden costs of the wars, the Post said.

According to the panel, the hidden costs include higher oil prices, the expense of treating wounded veterans and interest payments on money borrowed to pay for the wars, the newspaper said.

Wasted

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, November 12, 2007
Too much comedy in one article.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:50 PM

Classic! This is a keeper:

GOP staffers sensed Pelosi plot in temporary Fox News blackout

When Fox News programming mysteriously disappeared last week from televisions at the US Capitol, some Republican Congressional aides were quick to suspect foul play, according to a DC newspaper.

"Staffers looking for their daily dose of 'We report, you decide' coverage on Wednesday flipped to the usual channel, only to be surprised to find dead air," report Roll Call's Emily Heil and Anna Palmer. "Conspiracy theories, unsurprisingly, abounded."

Eyeing Democrats as likely culprits, some Republicans on the Hill suggested a far-ranging plot reaching even the highest levels of majority leadership. "I sense Pelosi's behind this," one finger-pointing GOP staffer told Roll Call of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).

Another Republican aide described the horrors of being compelled to watch other networks' news coverage during the work day.

"I was just forced to watch an MSNBC segment on going green by shopping at farmers markets," the withdrawal-afflicted staffer told the paper. "We need Fox back, stat."

"A Fox engineer explained that there was a technical glitch as the network shifted its feeds from analog to digital," reports Roll Call. "The receivers in the Capitol are being upgraded, too, he said, contributing to the problems. But all, he promises, is right again."

The Horror!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sex, Lies, and Iraq Contracts
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:09 PM

Sex Determined Army Iraq Contracts

A former employee of a Tennessee defense company is accused of sleeping with an Air Force contracting officer to secure Iraq contracts.

Eric W. Barton, who worked for EOD Technology Inc., which won at least $2.5 million in Iraq contracts, is accused of having a six-month relationship with Air Force Capt. Sherrie Remington, who at the time was in charge of awarding some contracts for work in Iraq, The San Antonio Express-News reported Nov. 11.

A report by the U.S. Army urges the company be debarred, which means the company -- which has been escorting military supply convoys in Iraq -- would not be allowed to get any more government contracts, the newspaper said.

From 2005 through spring 2006, when the affair was allegedly taking place, the company's contracts increased from $3.8 million to $106 million.

69

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Rudy! Rudy! Rudy! Rudy! Rudy!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:37 AM

Christian Right Threatens to Ditch the GOP If the Nominee Is Like Giuliani

James Dobson and Religious Right allies threaten to dump the Republican Party if the presidential nominee fails "family values" test.

Focus on the Family Chairman James C. Dobson emerged from a top-secret, closed-door meeting of the Religious Right in Salt Lake City with some tough talk for the Republican Party: If you nominate a candidate who is pro-choice on abortion, I will walk.

Dobson does not plan to be alone. The New York Times reported Oct. 1 that the FOF head was among a collection of Religious Right leaders who met during a gathering of the Council for National Policy (CNP) Sept. 29. Movement leaders pledged to back a third party if the GOP nominates Rudy Giuliani, the former mayor of New York City.

.....

The story went on to say, "Almost everyone present at the smaller group's meeting expressed support for a written resolution stating that 'if the Republican Party nominates a pro-abortion candidate we will consider running a third-party candidate,' participants said. The participants said that the group chose the qualified term 'consider' because it had not yet identified an alternative candidate, but that it was largely united in its plans to bolt the party if Mr. Giuliani, the former New York mayor, became the nominee."

Judy Riuliani

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, November 11, 2007
Any bets on who gets blamed?
posted by Clyde
7:31 AM

The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced

When the U.S. Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, it takes the security of its aircraft carriers very seriously indeed.

At least a dozen warships provide a physical guard while the technical wizardry of the world's only military superpower offers an invisible shield to detect and deter any intruders.

(snip)

American military chiefs have been left dumbstruck by an undetected Chinese submarine popping up at the heart of a recent Pacific exercise and close to the vast U.S.S. Kitty Hawk - a 1,000ft supercarrier with 4,500 personnel on board.

By the time it surfaced the 160ft Song Class diesel-electric attack submarine is understood to have sailed within viable range for launching torpedoes or missiles at the carrier.

(OOPS)

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Trumping up the charge
posted by Clyde
7:26 AM

Iraqi fighters 'grilled for evidence on Iran'
Interrogator says US military seeks evidence incriminating Tehran

US military officials are putting huge pressure on interrogators who question Iraqi insurgents to find incriminating evidence pointing to Iran, it was claimed last night.

Micah Brose, a privately contracted interrogator working for American forces in Iraq, near the Iranian border, told The Observer that information on Iran is 'gold'. The claim comes after Washington imposed sanctions on Iran last month, citing both its nuclear ambitions and its Revolutionary Guards' alleged support of Shia insurgents in Iraq. Last week the US military freed nine Iranians held in Iraq, including two it had accused of links to the Revolutionary Guards' Qods Force.

Brose, 30, who extracts information from detainees in Iraq, said: 'They push a lot for us to establish a link with Iran. They have pre-categories for us to go through, and by the sheer volume of categories there's clearly a lot more for Iran than there is for other stuff. Of all the recent requests I've had, I'd say 60 to 70 per cent are about Iran.

'It feels a lot like, if you get something and Iran's not involved, it's a let down.' He added: 'I've had people say to me, "They're really pushing the Iran thing. It's like, shit, you know." '

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, November 10, 2007
God's warriors run from fight
posted by Clyde
7:11 AM

Christian Coalition to bypass primaries

As Republican White House hopefuls tout endorsements from faith leaders, the once-powerful Christian Coalition of America will bypass the presidential primary contests entirely, the head of the South Carolina-based group said Thursday.

"We're going to be focusing on congressional races," president Roberta Combs told the Associated Press by telephone. "I think it's more important that we focus on the congressional races and getting more conservatives in office because that's who makes the laws that govern our land."

The conservative voting bloc is particularly important in early voting South Carolina, where one-third of Republican primary voters in 2000 described themselves as part of the white, religious right.

On Wednesday, the coalition's founder and televangelist Pat Robertson endorsed Rudy Giuliani. Robertson founded the coalition in 1998 as he ran for president, but severed ties in 2001.

(Hallelujah)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Believe it when you see it
posted by Clyde
6:58 AM

New Law May Spell End To Iraq Contractors

The government of Iraq has notified private security firms their immunity from Iraqi law is about to end, CBS News national security correspondent David Martin reports.

The title of a letter sent by the interior ministry - and obtained exclusively CBS News - says it all: "Removing the legal immunity." Until now, security firms like Blackwater have operated under a grant of immunity issued in 2004 by the then-top American in Iraq, L. Paul Bremer.

But the draft of a new law says "all immunities ... shall be cancelled."

That law still must be ratified by the Iraqi parliament, and if and when it is, private security firms would almost certainly pull out of Iraq.

(Cheney's pissed)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, November 9, 2007
Oh give me a home.....
posted by Wally
2:47 PM

Guess where good'ol Texas cowboy brush-clearin' Gee Dubya is NOT going to live after the White House

If you said "Crawford" you're right.
One thing is for certain about the post-presidency of George W. Bush: "Under no circumstances" will first lady Laura Bush spend her retirement years living at the much-ballyhooed Texas ranch that she and the president have been "escaping" to for the past seven years.

The new Bush home, our source assures us, will be far more extravagant and certainly less dusty. In fact, Mrs. Bush yesterday commented three times in one sentence about the infamous Texas dust during a visit to Amarillo and Midland, both in western Texas.
He'll have to find someplace else to play dress-up, fall off his bicycle, and play video games while continuing to slack off through his retirement just like he's doing through his presidency. There won't be any need for the make believe "ranch" with no animals once there's no need for...

photo-ops

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Oh, NOW you see the light?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:00 PM

Bush's 2000 recount lawyer set to blast Bush in speech.

Barry Richard, the lawyer who "achieved fame for his successful representation of George Bush in the Bush v. Gore recount suits, is set to give a speech blasting the Bush administration Saturday night" at the National Association of Former U.S. Attorneys' (NAFUSA) annual conference. There will also be a panel discussion featuring two of the ousted U.S. attorneys. The National Law Journal reports:

"I'm sure people will see my name on the program and expect I will be defending the administration," said Richard, a Tallahassee, Fla., lawyer.

"But I'm a constitutional lawyer. I am concerned with the Bush administration's assault on American liberties ... how the administration deals with habeas corpus and the administration's posture on electronic surveillance. This administration has gone farther than any other."
Rot in hell Barry

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Another Republican to retire
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:48 PM

Dropping like flys this year:

New Jersey Rep. Saxton to Retire

Rep. Jim Saxton, the twelve-term Republican from New Jersey's 3rd District, plans to retire after his current term, an announcement that could come as early as today, according to sources familiar with his decision.

Saxton's retirement opens up a seat he has held since 1984 and creates another vulnerable open seat for House Republicans. President Bush narrowly carried the district with 51 percent in 2004, and Democrats had been making noise about a potential challenge to Saxton in 2008.

Saxton is the 15th House Republican to decide against seeking reelection; just three Democrats have announced this will be their last term.

The swing nature of Saxton's seat places in it a highly vulnerable category along with open GOP seats in Illinois's 11th District, Arizona's 1st, Minnesota's 3rd, New Mexico's 1st and Ohio's 15th and 16th.

2008

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Believe it when I see it.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:35 AM

They'll cave, like always:

Pelosi's New Plan: No War Funding Bill If Bush Vetoes Iraq Withdrawal

Pelosi Announces Iraq Withdrawal Vote Friday

Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the House will vote as early as Friday on legislation that would spend $50 billion on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan but require that President Bush start bringing troops home.

The money is about a quarter of the $196 billion requested by Bush. It would finance about four months of combat in Iraq, Pelosi told reporters on Thursday.

"This is not a blank check for the president," she said at a Capitol Hill news conference.

"This is providing funding for the troops limited to a particular purpose, for a short time frame," she added.

Wussies

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:35 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya and Pfc. Clark at the Brooke Army Medical Center.


Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Boy Scouts are always prepared
posted by Clyde
5:52 AM

Officials push up-to-date plan for Iran

U.S. defense officials have signaled that up-to-date attack plans are available if needed in the escalating crisis over Iran's nuclear aims, although no strike appears imminent.

The Army and Marine Corps are under enormous strain from years of heavy ground fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Still, the U.S. has ample air and naval power to strike Iran if President Bush decided to target nuclear sites or to retaliate for alleged Iranian meddling in neighboring Iraq.

Among the possible targets, in addition to nuclear installations such as the centrifuge plant at Natanz: Iran's ballistic missile sites, Republican Guard bases and naval warfare assets that Tehran could use in a retaliatory closure of the Straits of Hormuz, a vital artery for the flow of Gulf oil.

The Navy has an aircraft carrier in the Gulf area with about 60 fighters and other aircraft that likely would feature prominently in a bombing campaign. And a contingent of about 2,200 Marines are on a standard deployment to the Gulf region aboard ships led by the Kearsarge, an amphibious assault ship.

(Bomb Bomb Bomb)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Another enlistment incentive?
posted by Clyde
5:41 AM

Jobless returning troops blame government

Strained by extended tours in Iraq, growing numbers of military reservists say the government is providing little help to soldiers who are denied their old jobs when they return home, Defense Department data shows.

The Pentagon survey of reservists in 2005-2006, obtained by The Associated Press, details increasing discontent among returning troops in protecting their legal rights after taking leave from work to fight for their country.

It found that 44 percent of the reservists polled said they were dissatisfied with how the Labor Department handled their complaint of employment discrimination based on their military status, up from 27 percent from 2004.

Nearly one-third, or 29 percent, said they had difficulty getting the information they needed from government agencies charged with protecting their rights, while 77 percent reported they didn't even bother trying to get assistance in part because they didn't think it would make a difference.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, November 8, 2007
Somebody must have lost the rubber stamp
posted by Wally
3:38 PM

For possibly the first time in his life, somebody told George W. Bush "NO!" Amazingly, it was Congress. We didn't think they had it in them.
Senate overrides veto on water bill

President George W. Bush suffered his first veto override Thursday as the Senate approved a $23 billion water resources bill despite his protest that it was filled with unnecessary projects.

The vote was 79 to 14. The outcome was a foregone conclusion, but it still marked a milestone for a president who spent his first six years with a much friendlier Congress controlled by the Republican Party. Now he confronts a more hostile, Democratic-controlled Congress, and the vote showed that even many Republicans would defy him on spending matters important to their political careers.

The bill will finance hundreds of Army Corps of Engineers projects, like dams, sewage plants and beach restoration, that are important to local districts and their representatives. It also includes money for the Gulf Coast, which is still recovering from Hurricane Katrina, and for Florida Everglades restoration efforts.

On Tuesday, the House voted 361 to 54 to override the veto. Both votes easily exceeded the two-thirds majority needed in each chamber to negate a presidential veto. The last such veto override happened when Congress gave President Bill Clinton the second of his two overrides in November 1998.
For Bush, water boarding is okay, but water projects, not so much. Now that Congress found the backbone to say "YES" to the water bill, will they be able to say "NO" to waterboarding? I'm not holding my breath, but it is refreshing to finally see the spoiled brat not get his own way. Maybe now he'll take his toys and go home. Or at least just go home.

Override!

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

There's some spare rooms in the White House
posted by Wally
10:20 AM

I'm sure George and Laura would be happy to show how much they support the troops by inviting them in to stay with them.
Veterans make up 1 in 4 homeless in US

Veterans make up one in four homeless people in the United States, though they are only 11 percent of the general adult population, according to a report to be released Thursday.

And homelessness is not just a problem among middle-age and elderly veterans. Younger veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan are trickling into shelters and soup kitchens seeking services, treatment or help with finding a job.

Some advocates say such an early presence of veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan at shelters does not bode well for the future. It took roughly a decade for the lives of Vietnam veterans to unravel to the point that they started showing up among the homeless. Advocates worry that intense and repeated deployments leave newer veterans particularly vulnerable.

"We're going to be having a tsunami of them eventually because the mental health toll from this war is enormous," said Daniel Tooth, director of veterans affairs for Lancaster County, Pa.
I suggest that homeless vets everywhere take those yellow ribbons at their words, and use them as invitations to move in and camp out in the back seat. Then we'll find out just how serious all those SUV owners are about really "supporting the troops".

Or maybe it's time for another "Bonus Army" march on Washington to get these veterans what they were promised by their government and what they so richly deserve.

Whatever happened to the GI Bill?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

We all owe Rep. Wexler a call or letter of thanks
posted by Wally
7:49 AM

Rep. Wexler Will Urge the Judiciary Committee to Hold Immediate Hearings on Impeachment
Rep. Robert Wexler sent his constituents this beautiful and admirable Email today:
As a person who supports holding this Administration accountable for their deceptive actions, you may be interested to know about the recent votes in the House regarding H.Res. 333, "Impeaching Richard B. Cheney, Vice President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors."

I share your belief that Vice President Cheney must answer for his deceptive actions in office, particularly with regard to the preparations for the Iraq war and the revelation of the identity of covert agent Valerie Plame Wilson as part of political retribution against her husband. That is why I voted against the motion to table debate on H.Res. 333. Along with only 85 other Democrats, I opposed tabling the measure and supported beginning immediate debate and a vote on the Cheney impeachment resolution. The vote on tabling the Kucinich resolution was rejected, and the House subsequently voted to refer the matter to the Judiciary Committee.

Vice President Dick Cheney and the Bush Administration have demonstrated a consistent pattern of abusing the law and misleading Congress and the American people. We see the consequences of these actions abroad in Iraq and at home through the violations of our civil liberties. The American people are served well with a legitimate and thorough impeachment inquiry. I will urge the Judiciary Committee to schedule impeachment hearings immediately and not let this issue languish as it has over the last six months. Only through hearings can we bring begin to correct the abuses of Dick Cheney and the Bush Administration; and, if it is determined in these hearings that Vice President Cheney has committed High Crimes and Misdemeanors, he should be impeached and removed from office. It is time for Congress to expose the multitude of misdeeds of the Administration, and I am hopeful that the Judiciary Committee will expeditiously begin an investigation of this matter.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions or concerns. I sincerely appreciate your input and hope that you will feel free to contact me anytime I may be of assistance to you. In addition, I hope you find my website (http://wexler.house.gov) a valuable resource in keeping up with events in Washington and in South Florida.

With warm regards,

Congressman Robert Wexler
Send him an email or give him a call and thank him for keeping impeachment ON the table where it belongs. While you're at it, contact your own Congress-critters and let them know how you feel about it. It's easy - just look at the left side of this web page and scroll down to "Take Action", enter your zip code and click GO.

Thanks to AfterDowningStreet for the news.

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

$29,945.01
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:43 AM

Time to pay up.

US debt tops $9 trillion for first time-Treasury

The U.S. Treasury Department said on Wednesday publicly held U.S. debt breached $9 trillion this week for the first time ever, just five weeks after Congress had raised the statutory borrowing limit.

At the end of September, U.S. President George W. Bush signed a measure to increase the debt limit ceiling to $9.815 trillion from $8.965 trillion, allowing the government to keep issuing debt.

The increase in the debt limit is the fifth since Bush took office in January 2001. The U.S. debt stood at about $5.6 trillion at the start of his presidency.

In approving the debt limit increase, Congressional lawmakers said the $850 billion increase should be large enough to allow the government to continue borrowing into 2009, well beyond next year's presidential and congressional elections.

Conservative?
$9,088,233,366,164.87

The estimated population of the United States is 303,471,651
so each citizen's share of this debt is $29,945.01.

The National Debt has continued to increase an average of
$1.44 billion per day since September 29, 2006

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, November 7, 2007
Bush's America: Made in China
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:16 AM

Did China just fire a warning shot at the Fed?

The full faith and credit of the United States are under a lot of stress these days, so much so that the public comments of an obscure Chinese official -- obscure to most Americans, at least -- are enough to spark big jumps in commodities, and equally big slides in stocks and the dollar to boot.

Cheng Siwei, vice chairman of the standing committee of the National People's Congress, reportedly suggested Wednesday that China might need to diversify its $1 trillion-plus holdings of foreign reserves because of the precipitous slide in the value of the dollar.

It's hard to know what Siwei, a UCLA-educated economist, hoped to accomplish by choosing this particular juncture to make his comments. Perhaps it was just an innocent academic observation on the rapid decline of the U.S. currency and the fact that any entity stuck holding huge levels of dollars would have to rethink their approach in such circumstances.

However, Siwei's position and previous history suggest otherwise. After all, his comments about the dubious quality of equities on the Shanghai Stock Exchange earlier this year helped spark a temporary swoon that hit U.S. markets at the end of February.

So a more realistic reading, perhaps, is that China wanted to send a warning shot across the bow of the Federal Reserve. The message: the U.S. central bank shouldn't think about cutting interest rates again. In a sense, it's a game of economic "chicken" played on a geopolitical scale.

Souplines

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Kucinich introduces resolution to impeach Cheney
posted by Wally
7:21 AM

Pussies in the Dem leadership immediately kill it
The House voted today to send a resolution considering the impeachment of Vice President Cheney to the Judiciary Committee, a move that embarrassed Democratic leaders who were forced into the parliamentary tactic to avoid a floor debate on impeachment.

Led by Rep. Dennis Kucinich, the long-shot anti-war candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, scores of Democrats were joined by scores of Republicans in initially supporting a Kucinich resolution that would have prompted a full debate on impeaching Cheney.

Democratic leaders long ago rejected any consideration of impeaching Cheney and President Bush as an irresponsible move supported only by the far left, so they tried today to table Kucinich's impeachment resolution. After initially having more than enough votes to kill the resolution - the "yea" tally to table impeachment topped out at 291 - Republicans decided they had a chance to politically shame Democrats into a full debate on the sensitive issue. Republicans gleefully said they wanted the debate to show the public how many Democrats would actually support impeaching Cheney, which they consider a move supported only by a fringe element of anti-war activists.

More than 120 members, predominantly Republicans, then switched their votes in favor of holding a one-hour debate on the issue, with a final vote of 251-162 supporting a debate on impeachment. Rather than allow a debate fraught with political risk, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) moved to send the Kucinich resolution to the Judiciary Committee, whose chairman, Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), has publicly speculated about impeaching the president or vice president but has declined taking any action since taking the gavel in January.
For a few brief moments, impeachment made an appearance on the table, before being swept back under the rugs. When are we going to get an opposition party that is actually willing to do their jobs?

Put it on the table

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:12 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya and French President Nicolas Sarkozy

Permalink :: 6 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, November 6, 2007
Oh the sweet smell of irony
posted by Wally
11:15 AM

White House Tells Musharraf: Never 'Restrict Constitutional Freedoms' To Fight Terrorism

During today's White House press briefing, spokeswoman Dana Perino condemned Gen. Pervez Musharraf's declaration of "emergency rule" in Pakistan. She said that the administration is "deeply disappointed" by the measure, which suspends the country's constitution, and believes it is never "reasonable" to "restrict constitutional freedoms in the name of fighting terrorism".

The Bush administration never suspended the U.S. Constitution; instead, it interpreted the document so broadly as to provide all the powers they desired. A look at some of the ways the White House has overstepped its constitutional powers in the name of national security:
(read some of the details at Think Progress)
Musharraf also complained of "judicial activism" to justify his declaration of emergency rule. Despite Perino"s comments, Musharraf seems to have taken a page from the White House playbook.

Read the full story and watch the video of the White House spokes-bimbo at ThinkProgress

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Senate Judiciary Committee says Torture Guy is OK with them
posted by Wally
10:58 AM

Approves Mukasey for a full Senate vote.
A divided Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday approved Michael Mukasey as U.S. attorney general despite concerns about the retired judge's refusal to denounce simulated drowning as unlawful torture.

On an 11-8 vote, with two Democrats joining all nine Republicans, the committee sent President George W. Bush's nomination of Mukasey to the full Democratic-led Senate for anticipated confirmation as chief U.S. law enforcement officer. The vote is likely to take place next week.

Bush's selection of Mukasey to replace former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales initially drew broad and bipartisan support. But Mukasey ran into trouble at his confirmation hearing when he declined to say if he considered the so-called waterboarding interrogation technique illegal torture.
Another day, another Democratic cave-in to Bush.

No Balls

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Olbermann Special Comment on Waterboarding
posted by Wally
7:27 AM

It is a fact startling in it's cynical simplicity and it requires cynical and simple words to be properly expressed. The presidency of George W. Bush has now devolved into a criminal conspiracy to cover the ass of George W. Bush. All the petulancy, all the childish threats, all the blank stare stupidity, all the invocations of World War III, all the sophistic questions about which terrorist attacks we wanted him not to stop, all the phony secrets, all the claims of executive privilidge, all the stumbling tap dancing of his nominees, all the verbal flatulence of his apologists, ALL of it is now, after one revelation last week, transparently clear for what it is: the pathetic and desperate manipulation of the government, the refocusing of our entire nation towards keeping this mock president, and this unstable vice-president, and this departed wildly self over-rating attorney general, and all the others from potential prosecution for having approved or ordered the illegal torture of prisoners being held in the name of our country.


Full Transcript at the MSNBC News Hole

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, November 5, 2007
Hope For The Future
posted by Wally
1:41 PM

It gives me hope for this country when I see young people taking chances and sticking their asses on the line for what is right. When I see them standing up to authority and at least trying to think for themselves instead of marching lockstep like good little brownshirts. It's discouraging to see the way they were treated, but it's heartening to see how they handled themselves, and knowing that this is going to backfire in a big ugly way on school administrators all across the country.
Scores of H.S. Students Face Expulsion Following Antiwar Sit-In

Over 30 anti-war protestors at Morton West High School in Berwyn face expulsion for a demonstration at the school on Thursday.

Over 70 students participated in a sit-in against the Iraq War on All Saint's Day, Thursday, November 1st. It began third hour when dozens of student gathered quietly in the lunchroom at Morton West High School and refused to leave. Administrators and police became involved immediately and locked down the school for a half hour after class ended. Students report that they were promised that there would be no consequences besides cutting classes if they took their protest outside so as not to disturb the school day. The students agreed and were led to a corner outside the cafeteria where they sang songs and held signs while classes resumed. "At first they tried to make us like leave the school, " said Jerry Petrack, who was with the protest from the beginning. Petracek referred to the massive walk-out for immigrant rights in 2006 that guided their decisions that morning. "They were like, 'march the streets' or whatever and we were like 'no we don't wanna leave the school because last time there was a protest outside the school and kids got arrested,' and we remembered that."

Deans, counselors and even the Superintendent tried to change the minds of a few, mainly those students with higher GPA scores to abandon the protest. The school called the homes of many of the protestors. Those whose parents arrived before the end of school and took their students home, or left before the protest ended at the final bell, received 3-5 days suspension. All others, an estimated 37 received 10 days suspension and expulsion papers. Parents report that Nowakowski stated those who are seventeen will also face police charges.

Parents who are frantically trying to spare their child's expulsion flooded the school yesterday to file appeals on the matter. So far, Superintendent Nowakowski has held firm on the punishments. They are expected to find out the results of the appeals on Tuesday. Parents and students report and the school's videotape shown to some of the parents confirms that the students were non-violent in their action and there was no damage to property.
If I was a parent of one of these kids, or if I was one of the parents who "arrived before the end of school and took their students home", I would have parked my car, gotten out, and taken great pride in sitting down and joining my son or daughter in the protest.

The full story has the superintendent's statement, along with contact information for the school administration and board, if you'd like to drop them a line and let them know what you think of their reaction to a "peace" protest. You know how school authorities feel about "peace".

Question Authority

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

What is it that Republicans keep saying about supporting the troops again?
posted by Wally
8:02 AM

Almost two million veterans lack health insurance coverage

Just under two million veterans (12.7 percent of non-elderly veterans) were uninsured in 2004, up 290,000 since 2000, the study published in the December, 2007 issue of the American Journal of Public Health found. An additional 3.8 million members of their households were also uninsured and ineligible for VA care.

"The number of uninsured vets has skyrocketed since 2000, and eligibility has been cut, barring hundreds of thousands of veterans from care," said Dr. David Himmelstein, lead author of the study, a physician at Cambridge Health Alliance, and Associate Professor of Medicine at Harvard. "We need a solution that works for veterans, their families, and all Americans - single payer national health insurance," he said.

"I see uninsured vets in my clinic every week," said Dr. Jeffrey Scavron, a former Navy Physician in Springfield, Massachusetts. "In many cases, they're too sick to work, but not yet sick enough for full disability which would qualify them for Medicare. Only the government can put men and woman into military service and only the government can guarantee that they are covered after they serve."
Skyrocketed since 2000? What was it that happened in 2000 that might have precipitated such an increase? Who would have thought that the "pro-military" "strong on defence" Republicans in complete control of things would have cut eligibility for our soldiers and veterans? Okay, so most of the people reading this site would have thought that. It's the same as children's health care - the GOP loves the soldier just like they love the fetus. But once the kid leaves the birth canal, or the soldier comes home from the battlefield (and is no longer valuable as cannon-fodder), they're on their own.

Whenever you hear a Republican talking about the troops remind them to recite the entire GOP motto and not just the first half. When they say "support the troops" the really mean "support the troops...

...until they become veterans

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:28 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya and Condi watching Karen Hughes sign the affadavit announcing her retirement from the State Dept.


Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, November 4, 2007
What's a little smoke between friends?
posted by Clyde
7:44 AM

Thompson Adviser Has Criminal Past

Republican presidential candidate Fred D. Thompson has been crisscrossing the country since early this summer on a private jet lent to him by a businessman and close adviser who has a criminal record for drug dealing.

Thompson selected the businessman, Philip Martin, to raise seed money for his White House bid. Martin is one of four campaign co-chairmen and the head of a group called the "first day founders." Campaign aides jokingly began to refer to Martin, who has been friends with Thompson since the early 1990s, as the head of "Thompson's Airforce."

Thompson's frequent flights aboard Martin's twin-engine Cessna 560 Citation have saved him more than $100,000, because until the law changed in September, campaign-finance rules allowed presidential candidates to reimburse private jet owners for just a fraction of the true cost of flights.

Martin entered a plea of guilty to the sale of 11 pounds of marijuana in 1979; the court withheld judgment pending completion of his probation. He was charged in 1983 with violating his probation and with multiple counts of felony bookmaking, cocaine trafficking and conspiracy. He pleaded no contest to the cocaine-trafficking and conspiracy charges, which stemmed from a plan to sell $30,000 worth of the drug, and was continued on probation.

(Link)

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Remember, Bush thinks Pakistan is a democracy
posted by Clyde
7:28 AM

Straying Partner Leaves White House in a Lurch

For more than five months the United States has been trying to orchestrate a political transition in Pakistan that would manage to somehow keep Gen. Pervez Musharraf in power without making a mockery of President Bush's promotion of democracy in the Muslim world.

On Saturday, those carefully laid plans fell apart spectacularly. Now the White House is stuck in wait-and-see mode, with limited options and a lack of clarity about the way forward.

General Musharraf's move to seize emergency powers and abandon the Constitution left Bush administration officials close to their nightmare: an American-backed military dictator who is risking civil instability in a country with nuclear weapons and an increasingly alienated public.

Mr. Bush entered a delicate dance with Pakistan immediately after the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, when General Musharraf pledged his cooperation in the fight against Al Qaeda, whose top leaders, including Osama bin Laden, are believed to be hiding out in the mountainous border region between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, November 3, 2007
Along came a story...
posted by Clyde
7:28 AM

A soldier's story: Nowhere to go

More service members killed themselves while serving in the Iraq war last year than in any year since the war began, and the suicide count for 2007 is on track to surpass that. The dead are generally junior enlisted soldiers who are single, white and male. They are Mike Crutchfield.

It's two days before Christmas 2006, but it doesn't feel much like the holidays in "The Suck," what soldiers sometimes call Iraq, where the days blend together -- broken up only by brilliant sunrises and sunsets.

Michael Crutchfield taps out a final e-mail to his family 7,392 miles away in Stockton. It is a suicide note -- to his mother, brother, sister and nephew. He hits "send" at 12:13 p.m. Then the 21-year-old Army specialist picks up his military-issued M9 Beretta. He presses it to his chest. And he fires.

Two soldiers passing Mike's office in the Balad motor pool hear the gunshot and a shell hit the floor. Then groaning. They kick the door in and there's Mike, sitting in his chair, his arms hanging limp, his head tilted back.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Oh those wacky Republicans
posted by Clyde
6:39 AM

Rudy's bogus healthcare stats
Giuliani claims he might not have survived prostate cancer under "socialized medicine," yet he was covered by a government-provided plan.

To a politician pandering to his party's right wing, a role that Rudolph Giuliani plays every day now, citing his own recovery from prostate cancer as an argument against "socialized medicine" must have seemed like pure genius. The radio ad that went up this week in New Hampshire suggests that Giuliani not only faced down the 9/11 terrorists -- or something like that -- but triumphed over a terrifying disease as well, without the help of any government bureaucrats.

Or as Giuliani himself says in the controversial ad: "I had prostate cancer five, six years ago. My chance of surviving cancer -- and thank God I was cured of it -- in the United States: 82 percent. My chances of surviving prostate cancer in England: only 44 percent under socialized medicine."

Yes, it's another inspiring and instructive story -- or would be, perhaps, if only it were true.

The former New York mayor did survive prostate cancer, but otherwise his statistical claims were not difficult to debunk, as reporters for the New York Times, the Washington Post, MSNBC and other news outlets quickly discovered. Giuliani had picked up his numbers from an article in City Journal, a publication of the right-wing Manhattan Institute, and simply repeated them in public without bothering to check their validity. Unfortunately, they were essentially fraudulent figures, extrapolated inaccurately from old data (by a doctor who also advises the Giuliani campaign on healthcare).

(Link)

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Why worry about terrorists when you have Homeland Security?
posted by Clyde
6:06 AM

DHS Relaxes Chemical Plant Storage Rules

The Department of Homeland Security yesterday eased rules requiring tens of thousands of U.S. chemical plants to protect their stockpiles from terrorists, pleasing chemical industry lobbyists but disappointing environmentalists and some Democratic lawmakers, who said they will beef up requirements next year.

The regulations will touch a wide range of U.S. industry, including pulp and paper mills, petroleum plants, food and agriculture facilities, and manufacturing and industrial cleaning sites.

The measure has been delayed for years by disagreements within the Bush administration over the need for new regulations after the 2001 terrorist attacks. Partisan battling is likely to intensify in the Democratic Congress because the chemical security legislation expires in September 2009.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff described the rules as "a critical piece" of federal efforts to diminish the threat posed by large private stockpiles of dangerous chemicals.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, November 2, 2007
Bob Kincaid talks with Scott Ritter
posted by Wally
8:18 AM

Last week, the former Chief UN weapons inspector in Iraq ('91 - 98) Scott Ritter spoke at West Virginia State University. Afterwards he paid a visit to our good friend Bob Kincaid at the Head-On Radio Network and spent some time talking about his recent visits to Iran and the reality on the ground in that country, about the media, and the responsibility of all Americans to pay attention to what's going on in the world, and the absolute need for us to take action to keep our government from doing insanely stupid things (like invading Iran).

Not a lot of flash, and certainly no "fox-like" shouting (thank you Bob), just a very insightful, intelligent, informative discussion with someone who's been there, and who has the inside experience, knowledge, and contacts to really know what the hell is going on beyond the spin and propaganda being spewed by the administration and parrotted by the mainstream media. It's 27 minutes long, and definitely worth the listen.

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Fine with me
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:28 AM

America's brat throws another tantrum


Bush: No attorney general if not Mukasey

President Bush sought to save Michael Mukasey's troubled nomination for attorney general Thursday, defending the retired judge's refusal to say whether he considers waterboarding torture and warning of a leaderless Justice Department if Democrats do not confirm him.

"If the Senate Judiciary Committee were to block Judge Mukasey on these grounds, they would set a new standard for confirmation that could not be met by any responsible nominee for attorney general," Bush said in a speech at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.

"That would guarantee that America would have no attorney general during this time of war," the president said.

The comment raised questions about whether Bush would nominate anyone else to succeed Alberto Gonzales as the nation's top law enforcer. Bush could bypass Congress by filling the job with someone serving in an acting capacity over the last 14 months of his administration.

Whaaaaa Whaaaaa

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:21 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya with a bag of BBQ


Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Fox guards hen house
posted by Clyde
6:09 AM

Gates: Army contracting needs will be met

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday the Pentagon intends to pursue a number of recommendations by a panel that said the Army needs another 2,000 military and civilian personnel to better manage contracts after years of waste, fraud and abuse.

Now, the Army doesn't have enough personnel or training to adequately supply its soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to the panel's report obtained by The Associated Press.

Providing forces on the move with ever-changing technologies is not as simple as it once was, says the report by an independent panel, and the Army "lacks the leadership and personnel [military and civilian] to provide sufficient contracting support."

These shortcomings "have significantly contributed to the waste, fraud and abuse" by Army personnel in Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan, the panel said.

(Believe it when you see it)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Way to state the obvious Einstein!
posted by Clyde
6:03 AM

Ex-Saudi ambassador: Kingdom could have helped U.S. prevent 9/11

Saudi Arabia could have helped the United States prevent al Qaeda's 2001 attacks on New York and Washington if American officials had consulted Saudi authorities in a "credible" way, the kingdom's former ambassador said in a documentary aired Thursday.

The comments by Prince Bandar bin Sultan are similar to the remarks this week by Saudi King Abdullah that suggested Britain could have prevented the July 2005 train bombings in London if it had heeded warnings from Riyadh.

Speaking to the Arabic satellite network Al-Arabiya on Thursday, Bandar -- now Abdullah's national security adviser -- said Saudi intelligence was "actively following" most of the September 11, 2001, plotters "with precision."

"If U.S. security authorities had engaged their Saudi counterparts in a serious and credible manner, in my opinion, we would have avoided what happened," he said.

(Gee Ya Think)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, November 1, 2007
The most qualified
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:01 PM

Colbert Files for South Carolina Primary

Comedian Stephen Colbert's fanciful White House bid took a real step Thursday.

It's up to South Carolina Democrats to decide whether to take him seriously.

Colbert, who poses as a conservative talk show host on the Comedy Central cable network, filed to get on the ballot as a Democratic candidate in his native South Carolina. His campaign paid a $2,500 filing fee just before the noon deadline, said state Democratic Party Chairwoman Carol Fowler.

Whether he'll appear on the ballot will be decided by party officials later Thursday.

Colbert/Stewart '08

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Olbermann parses Bush's "temper tantrum"
posted by Wally
8:19 AM

Who knew when he pushed the No Child Left Behind Act that George W. Bush was really looking out for himself? The President's petulance against Congress, against Democrats, against anyone else he sees thwarting his own ID devolving from last week's buffoonish door slamming to a level meriting the use of the word "tantrum".

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Rudy for the Republican nominee!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:49 AM

Clinton would cream Giuliani, poll finds: GOP at lowest level in a generation

One year before voters go to the polls to select the next president, the Republican Party is as weak as it has been in a generation, a detailed new poll suggests. In a hypothetical match-up between Hillary Clinton and Rudy Giuliani, bloc after bloc of traditionally Republican voters break for Clinton: She wins the South. She polls evenly with voters who attend church at least once a week. She splits families with a household income above $100,000. She loses rural voters and men - but only by a narrow margin. All are constituencies Republicans have dominated for decades; George W. Bush won each by double-digit margins.

The findings from The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press remain preliminary, considering even the primaries are still two months off. But Pew questioned an unusually large number of voters to try to paint the most accurate picture possible of where the presidential contest stands today.

Should the race continue down its current trajectory, the poll finds Clinton defeating Giuliani by eight percentage points. Other recent polls, however, have placed Giuliani ahead of Clinton in a head-to-head race. But those polls predict Clinton would beat Fred Thompson, John McCain or Mitt Romney. And Barack Obama would defeat Giuliani - though narrowly - according to at least four polls taken in October...

In July 2004, the Democratic Party had a slight lead as the party "better able to manage the federal government" and as the party that is "more honest and ethical." Today Democrats lead both categories by double-digit margins. By even larger margins, Democrats are seen as the party "more concerned about people like me" (by 29 percentage points) and the party best able to bring about "needed change" (by 22 percentage points). Other polling has also showed that for the first time in decades Americans now see the two parties as equally qualified to face down national security threats - erasing the "security advantage" Republicans have long relied on...

9/11

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Time to start handing out recruiting forms to all your Republican warmongering friends
posted by Wally
6:31 AM

I'm talking to you O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Coulter, Hannity, Savage, Beck, all you freepers.... You all think this war is so important? Now's your chance to prove it. Your country needs you. Grab a uniform and a weapon and head to Iraq. Put up or shut up, bitches.

Last month, the Pentagon loudly announced that they "all branches of the armed forces met or exceeded their recruitment goals for the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30". So what's all this about then?
Army Has Record Low Level of Recruits

The Army began its recruiting year Oct. 1 with fewer signed up for basic training than in any year since it became an all-volunteer service in 1973, a top general said Wednesday.

Gen. William S. Wallace, whose duties as commander of Army Training and Doctrine Command include management of recruiting, told reporters at the Pentagon that the historic dip will make it harder to achieve the full-year recruiting goal — after just barely reaching it in the year ended Sept. 30.

Making it even tougher is the decline in what the Army calls its delayed entry pool, which is the group of enlistees who have signed contracts to join the Army but want to wait before shipping off to basic training. Normally the Army tries to start its recruiting year with a delayed entry pool equal to about 25 percent of its full-year goal, which in this case would equate to 20,000 recruits.
What it looks like is that they are following the examples set by the Commander in Chief and his cast of handlers and cronies. They appear to have cut corners and bent over backwards and changed recruiting procedures strictly to meet last years' goals - something you would expect from an Enron administration - essentially "stealing" from this year so they could claim that last year was a success. How they'll meet this years' goal is anybody's guess, but I'm beginning to feel a draft - especially if Bush invades Iran like everyone seems to think he will do. In fitting with a Bush presidency, one way they met last year's goal was by lowering expectations for both quantity and quality of new recruits - taking a greater percentage of high school dropouts, criminals, etc. Heck, I bet they'll even take people with anal cysts.

Uncle Sam Wants You

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

 

 

 Headlines & Comments

 
 True! by Daryl Cagle

See more TRUE cartoons by Daryl Cagle
 

Kansas City's own...
dubyaD40.com

Site Meter