Home

Columnists

Merchandise

Other Stuff

 

 Go Vote!


My site was nominated for Best Political Blog!
 

 Air America Radio

 Head-On Radio Network

 Search dubyaD40.com

Google


Search Web
Search dubyaD40.com

 Ads by The Google

 Take Action

 Advertisers

 Recent Posts

 Archives

 Today's Reason To Drink



 Want to link to us?


It's easy to do.  Right click on the image below and choose "Copy."  Then paste it on your site.


 

 
 Blogroll

 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 Today's Topics

 
Friday, November 30, 2007
Rudy: Falsifying the numbers
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:42 PM

Citing statistics, Giuliani misses time and again

In almost every appearance as he campaigns for the Republican presidential nomination, Rudolph W. Giuliani cites a fusillade of statistics and facts to make his arguments about his successes in running New York City and the merits of his views.

Discussing his crime-fighting success as mayor, Mr. Giuliani told a television interviewer that New York was “the only city in America that has reduced crime every single year since 1994.” In New Hampshire this week, he told a public forum that when he became mayor in 1994, New York “had been averaging like 1,800, 1,900 murders for almost 30 years.” When a recent Republican debate turned to the question of fiscal responsibility, he boasted that “under me, spending went down by 7 percent.”

All of these statements are incomplete, exaggerated or just plain wrong. And while, to be sure, all candidates use misleading statistics from time to time, Mr. Giuliani has made statistics a central part of his candidacy as he campaigns on his record.

For instance, another major American city claims to have reduced crime every year since 1994: Chicago. New York averaged 1,514 murders a year during the three decades before Mr. Giuliani took office; it did not record more than 1,800 homicides until 1980. And Mr. Giuliani’s own memoir states that spending grew an average of 3.7 percent for most of his tenure; an aide said Mr. Giuliani had meant to say that he had proposed a 7 percent reduction in per capita spending during his time as mayor.

He does know 9-11 though!

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Impeachment
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:36 PM

Biden: Impeachment if Bush bombs Iran

Presidential hopeful Delaware Sen. Joe Biden stated unequivocally that he will move to impeach President Bush if he bombs Iran without first gaining congressional approval.

Biden spoke in front of a crowd of approximately 100 at a candidate forum held Thursday at Seacoast Media Group. The forum focused on the Iraq war and foreign policy. When an audience member expressed fear of a war with Iran, Biden said he does not typically engage in threats, but had no qualms about issuing a direct warning to the Oval Office.

"The president has no authority to unilaterally attack Iran, and if he does, as Foreign Relations Committee chairman, I will move to impeach," said Biden, whose words were followed by a raucous applause from the local audience. Biden said he is in the process of meeting with constitutional law experts to prepare a legal memorandum saying as much and intends to send it to the president.

When local resident Joel Carp asked Biden why not impeach now, given what has already been done, Biden said it was a valid point, but might not be constitutionally valid and potentially counterproductive. A case for impeachment must have clear evidence, Biden said, and blame should be directed at the right parties. "If you're going to impeach George Bush, you better impeach (Vice President Dick) Cheney first," said Biden, again drawing applause.

Biden said the best deterrent to prevent pre-emptive military action in Iran is to make it clear, even if it is at the end of his final term, action will be taken against Bush to ensure "his legacy will be marred for all time."...

Ya right

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Oh no you di'int!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:41 AM

African-Americans apparently used to blow themselves up and tried to take over the country, forcing the government to make them sit in the back of the bus:

Rice: I know what it's like to be Palestinian

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice reportedly said in Annapolis this week that her childhood in the segregated South had helped her to understand the suffering on both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

"I know what its like to hear that you can't use a certain road or pass through a checkpoint because you are a Palestinian. I know what it is like to feel discriminated against and powerless," Rice told a closed meeting of Arab and Israeli representatives, according to the Dutch representative at the summit, Franz Timmermans.

"Like Israelis, I understand what it's like to go to sleep not knowing if you will be hurt in an explosion, the feeling of terror walking around your own neighborhood, or walking to your house of prayer," Timmermans quoted Rice as saying, the Washington Post reported.

Rice described her childhood in Birmingham, Alabama, during the era of segregation and the killing of four young girls in a bombing at a Baptist church in 1963. She reportedly said the bombing, which killed one of her classmates, helps her understand the fear of terrorism felt by Israelis.

Make me a sammich, Condi!

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Goose meet Gander
posted by Clyde
5:26 AM

U.S. Special Counsel Says He Won't Provide Files
Official Calls Personal Records Not Relevant to OPM Probe

A U.S. official overseeing a probe of potential White House misconduct declared through a spokesman yesterday that he will not give federal investigators copies of personal files that he deleted from his office computer.

The decision by Special Counsel Scott J. Bloch escalates the confrontation between the Bush appointee and the White House, each of which is investigating the other.

Bloch's office is tasked with upholding laws against whistle-blower retaliation and partisan politicking in federal agencies. Earlier this year, Bloch directed lawyers in his office to look into charges that former Bush adviser Karl Rove inappropriately deployed government employees in Republican political campaigns.

Bloch had previously been targeted by the White House, which in 2005 asked the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to investigate allegations that Bloch had retaliated against whistle-blowers among his own staff members and improperly dismissed whistle-blower cases brought to the agency by others.

(Link)

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

No longer a matter of trust
posted by Clyde
4:57 AM

Virginia GOP Gets Strict on Voting
Demand for Loyalty Pledge at Primary Targets Crossovers, Independents

The loyalty pledge to the Republican Party that Virginia voters will be required to sign if they vote in the state's GOP presidential primary on Feb. 12 is another attempt by the party to police the open primary system.

On Feb. 12, a GOP primary voter will have to sign a piece of paper that says, "I, the undersigned, pledge that I intend to support the nominee of the Republican Party for President."

Party officials said Wednesday they are worried that Democrats and independents have infiltrated past GOP nominating contests. The state does not require voters to register by political party, which means a voter can decide on the day of the primary whether to participate in the Republican or Democratic primary.

Political analysts say it is rare for a partisan voter aligned with one party to vote in the other party's nominating contest. But some conservatives say Democrats and independents helped Sen. John W. Warner (R-Va.) win his 1996 primary against James C. Miller III. In 2000, Arizona Sen. John McCain (R) urged Democrats and independents to vote for him in Virginia's GOP presidential primary. But McCain lost to George W. Bush by 59,000 votes.

(Link)

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, November 29, 2007
This is why you don't let criminals police themselves
posted by Wally
8:15 AM

Bush appointee investigating Rove Used "Geeks on Call" to Delete Files On His Office Computer

The head of the federal agency investigating Karl Rove's White House political operation is facing allegations that he improperly deleted computer files during another probe, using a private computer-help company, Geeks on Call.

Scott Bloch runs the Office of Special Counsel, an agency charged with protecting government whistleblowers and enforcing a ban on federal employees engaging in partisan political activity. Mr. Bloch's agency is looking into whether Mr. Rove and other White House officials used government agencies to help re-elect Republicans in 2006.

Recently, investigators learned that Mr. Bloch erased all the files on his office personal computer late last year. They are now trying to determine whether the deletions were improper or part of a cover-up, lawyers close to the case said.

Mr. Bloch had his computer's hard disk completely cleansed using a "seven-level" wipe: a thorough scrubbing that conforms to Defense Department data-security standards. The process makes it nearly impossible for forensics experts to restore the data later. He also directed Geeks on Call to erase laptop computers that had been used by his two top political deputies, who had recently left the agency.

Mr. Bloch was a loyal member of the Bush administration, serving in the Justice Department's office of faith-based programs, when the president named him to head the Office of Special Counsel in 2003. Unlike many administration appointees, Mr. Bloch doesn't serve at the pleasure of the president. He has a fixed five-year term and may be removed only for malfeasance. That is supposed to ensure his agency has the independence to pursue any probe.
Cover-up

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Rudolph the red nosed adulterer
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:37 AM

Can you imagine if Clinton did this? They'd hang him.

City Said to Have Paid Bills as Giuliani Affair Began

Late in his tenure as mayor of New York, Rudolph W. Giuliani billed tens of thousands of dollars in travel expenses to little-known city agencies as he was beginning an extramarital affair, a political Web site reported yesterday.

The report, on the Politico Web site, cited documents obtained under the New York State Freedom of Information Law. But it was unclear from those documents whether Mr. Giuliani allocated those travel costs, from 1999 through 2001, to obscure city offices in an attempt to conceal expenses associated with the relationship or for some accounting purpose.

The administration of Mr. Giuliani's successor, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, said in 2002, several months after taking office, that the Giuliani administration had kept the budget for the mayor's office artificially low by paying more than $5 million in salaries through other city agencies. The agencies to which Mr. Giuliani billed the travel expenses were outside the mayor's office.

.....

The documents obtained by Politico, described as American Express bills and travel documents, detailed hotel, gas and other costs for the detectives on trips to Southampton, N.Y. The woman with whom Mr. Giuliani was having an affair, Judith Nathan, who became his third wife, had a condominium in the Long Island beach community.

Who played "the wife" during sex?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, November 28, 2007
Last one out, turn off the lights
posted by Wally
7:42 AM

Rat. Ship. You know the drill. This time it's Bush's top economic advisor and former classmate bailing out.
Al Hubbard, director of President George W. Bush's National Economic Council, will step down by the end of the year, two administration officials said today.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson will gain clout as a result of Hubbard's departure and pursue more pragmatic economic policies, including those dealing with the credit crisis, said Peter Morici, a professor of business at the University of Maryland. Hubbard was too ideologically driven, he said.

Hubbard's decision to resign as Bush's top economic adviser follows the departure of several other senior officials, including Homeland Security adviser Frances Fragos Townsend and Karl Rove, Bush's top political adviser.
This time, in a hilarious reversal of roles, a Republican is whining because the Democrats are being mean to him. Hubbard says he's quitting because the mean old Dems aren't just happily going along with all of Bush's oh so successful economic policies. If they're not going to play nice and do whatever the President says - you know, like the Republicans did through the Clinton Presidency - then he's just going to take his toys and go home.

Isn't is fun having 6 year olds running the country? If we can just make it through the next 418 days until they're gone....

And STAY Out!

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:35 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link below to submit your caption of Dubya listening to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.


Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Buh Bye Denny
posted by Wally
8:58 AM

Take one look at Rep. Denny Hastert (R-IL) and you realize that if there's gravy around, he's pushing his way to the trough. So it's no surprise that he's at the front of the Republican parade marching out of Congress and onto the lobbying gravy-train, getting out while the revolving doors are still spinning.

As of Monday night, Denny is no longer a Congresscritter, and available on K-Street.
Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert resigned from Congress on Monday, bringing to an end his nearly 21 years representing the Fox Valley in Washington, D.C.

The 69-year-old Kendall County Republican delivered his final speech on the House floor earlier this month, announcing that he would retire before year's end, though he did not offer specifics. This summer, Hastert announced that he would not seek re-election after his 11th term ends in January 2009.
He says, of course, that it's to spend more time with his family, but I doubt it.

Starting next year, according to new Congressional ethics rules, retiring congressmen will have to wait at least 2 years before moving into the extremely lucrative lobbying world. Currently, they don't even need to wait 2 minutes, leading to some blatant conflicts of interest, such as when Billy Tauzin (R-LA) wrote the Medicare drug law and then immediately quit congress to go work for the drug companies who will benefit from the new law. Then on Monday, Trent Lott (R-MS) suddenly announced that he's giving up his leadership positions to retire before the end of the year, amid suggestions that he too will be taking a high paid position with a lobbying firm.

Until Lott's announcement, I was naive enough to believe that maybe Denny Hastert actually was resigning early due to scandal and embarrassment, and to give the Republicans a better chance of winning his open seat because Illinois will have to hold a special election (rather than the GOP having their asses handed to them in the general election).
In his letter to Blagojevich, Hastert said that he had been advised to resign by Monday to allow Blagojevich time to call the special primary on Feb. 5, the same day as the scheduled primary. "This will minimize inconvenience to the voters and expense to the counties in the 14th Congressional District," Hastert wrote.
After seeing Lott's statement, however, I've changed my assessment. Denny is just smarter and/or faster than Lott - and how embarrassing is it to be slower than fat-Denny?

Any bets on how long until he's collecting a K-Street paycheck fat enough to be commensurate with his ass?

Good riddance

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Answer: "very nice, very cordial" Question: What's a polite way to call someone a "douchebag"?
posted by Wally
7:59 AM

Finally, Al Gore found himself in the Oval Office. Unfortunately, he was just there to visit the guy who stole the election from him, and not to take over his rightful position there.
The occasion was an annual tradition, the presidential photo opportunity with Nobel Prize winners. But Gore, who shared the Nobel Peace Prize for his work on the environment, was given special treatment: a private tête-à-tête with Bush, which lasted more than 30 minutes, provoking intense speculation about just what the two men talked about.

"Of course, we talked about global warming - the whole time," Gore, the former vice president, said as he and his wife, Tipper, emerged onto Pennsylvania Avenue, where they were mobbed by reporters and photographers.

No surprise there. Gore, whose documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth," won an Academy Award, is a staunch critic of the Bush administration's environmental policy. "He's constantly looking for opportunities to make an impact on this issue," said Michael Feldman, an adviser, "so being invited to the political center of the universe is a great thing for him."

"It was a private meeting," he said, "and I'm not going to say anything about it other than that it was very nice, very cordial. He was very gracious in setting up the meeting, and it was a very good and very substantive conversation. That's all."
Translation: Bush is as much of a tool as everyone thinks he is, and was too busy playing with his Wii to pay attention to anything he didn't want to hear - like "science" or "fact-based" reality. Imagine Al Gore trying to explain complex concept to Dubya - something difficult to comprehend, like "temperature" - being faced with that glazed-over Alfred E. Neumann blank stare, and realizing he'd be more successful talking to Barney.

Dammit Al, why didn't you run?

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

More Massive Bellyflops From The Republican Netroots
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:56 AM



The National Republican Campaign Committee recently held a contest to find the best pro-Republican YouTube videos. They promised to post the top-five videos submitted onto their site where the public could vote on the best one.

Then the deadline passed and the Republicans ran into a bit of a problem. Only five videos were submitted. The one posted above is one of them.

Will the Republicans honor their word to put the top five videos up for the public to vote on? Would you not love to see this made the official Republican "netroots" video?

Dumbazz's

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

All that bacon almost finally paid off
posted by Wally
7:21 AM

For the past 3 years we've been asking you to send bacon to Cheney. It almost paid off yesterday when doctors found that he had an irregular heartbeat and admitted him for treatment. After spending several hours searching for his heart - one that makes the Grinch's heart (before it grew 3 sizes) point and laugh at how small it is - they hit it with shock treatment to jumpstart it. Or maybe they were "rebooting" him. Either way, it's an encouraging sign that tbe bacon is working.
Doctors administered an electrical shock to Vice President Dick Cheney's heart and restored it to a normal rhythm during a 2 1/2 -hour hospital visit yesterday.

Cheney, who has a history of heart problems, was discovered to have an irregular heartbeat about 7 a.m. when he was seen by doctors at the White House for a lingering cough from a cold. He remained at work throughout the day, joining President Bush in meetings with Mideast leaders.

The irregular heartbeat was determined to be atrial fibrillation, an abnormal rhythm involving the upper chambers of the heart, said spokeswoman Megan Mitchell. He went to the hospital about 5 p.m. and was discharged about 7:30 p.m.

"He'll probably have other episodes," said Eldadah, who is not involved in Cheney's care. "Atrial fibrillation in and of itself is not threatening. The problem is that it has long term consequences. It increases the risk of stroke." He said Cheney probably would be put on the most potent blood thinner.
Are blood-thinners bad for vampires?

So close...

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, November 26, 2007
Republican economics...
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:29 PM

Reckoning: The Economic Consequences Of Mr. Bush

When we look back someday at the catastrophe that was the Bush administration, we will think of many things: the tragedy of the Iraq war, the shame of Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, the erosion of civil liberties. The damage done to the American economy does not make front-page headlines every day, but the repercussions will be felt beyond the lifetime of anyone reading this page...

...Bill Clinton had left President Bush in an ideal position to pursue such policies. Remember the presidential debates in 2000 between Al Gore and George Bush, and how the two men argued over how to spend America's anticipated $2.2 trillion budget surplus? The country could well have afforded to ramp up domestic investment in key areas. In fact, doing so would have staved off recession in the short run while spurring growth in the long run.

But the Bush administration had its own ideas. The first major economic initiative pursued by the president was a massive tax cut for the rich, enacted in June of 2001. Those with incomes over a million got a tax cut of $18,000-more than 30 times larger than the cut received by the average American. The inequities were compounded by a second tax cut, in 2003, this one skewed even more heavily toward the rich. Together these tax cuts, when fully implemented and if made permanent, mean that in 2012 the average reduction for an American in the bottom 20 percent will be a scant $45, while those with incomes of more than $1 million will see their tax bills reduced by an average of $162,000...

...In breathtaking disregard for the most basic rules of fiscal propriety, the administration continued to cut taxes even as it undertook expensive new spending programs and embarked on a financially ruinous "war of choice" in Iraq. A budget surplus of 2.4 percent of gross domestic product (G.D.P.), which greeted Bush as he took office, turned into a deficit of 3.6 percent in the space of four years. The United States had not experienced a turnaround of this magnitude since the global crisis of World War II.

Fiscally Conservative?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
8:23 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya hugging members of Virginia tribes after giving his Thanksgiving speech in Charles City, VA.

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Trent Lott to Bail on Senate - There's More Money on the Lobbying Gravy Train
posted by Wally
7:37 AM

Sen. Trent Lott to resign
NBC News: Minority whip would leave Senate before end of the year
NBC News has learned that Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., the minority whip is in the midst of informing close allies that he plans to resign his senate seat before the end of the year. It's possible a formal announcement of his plans could take place as early as today.
Now what would cause someone as powerful as Trent Lott - the number 2 Republican in the Senate - to step down. More telling, what would cause him to resign a year early, before his term is up and he is facing re-election? It could be that we're about to find out some really good dirt about his private life - although looking at the likes of Tom Delay and David "diaper-Dave" Vitter - ethical violations and criminal activity don't seem to have much impact within the Republican party.
While the exact reason Lott is stepping down before he finishes his term is unknown, the general speculation is that a quick departure immunizes Lott against tougher restrictions in a new lobbying law that takes effect at the end of the year. That law would require Senators to wait two-years before entering the lucrative world of lobbying Congress.
That explains it. He's a Republican, so more than service to country, or duty, or patriotism or loyalty or integrity, it's all about the money flowing into his pocket.

Good Riddance

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, November 25, 2007
Gee, isn't that what the Constitution mandates?
posted by Clyde
8:23 AM

Lawmaker wants stronger say in declaring war

Rep. William Delahunt says it's high time to start thinking about the next war.

Even as Congress wrestles with attempts to bring home U.S. troops from Iraq, the Massachusetts Democrat is teaming up with some Republican colleagues on legislation to give Congress a stronger say in when the country should go to war.

Delahunt recently joined Republican Reps. Walter Jones of North Carolina, Wayne Gilchrest of Maryland and 2008 presidential candidate Ron Paul of Texas on a measure that would limit the president's ability to go to war without Congress' approval.

The resolution would prohibit the president from ordering military action without congressional approval unless the U.S. or its troops were attacked, or if U.S. citizens abroad need to be protected or evacuated.

(Link)

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Nation building goes awry
posted by Clyde
7:57 AM

U.S. Notes Limited Progress in Afghan War
Strategic Goals Unmet, White House Concludes

A White House assessment of the war in Afghanistan has concluded that wide-ranging strategic goals that the Bush administration set for 2007 have not been met, even as U.S. and NATO forces have scored significant combat successes against resurgent Taliban fighters, according to U.S. officials.

The evaluation this month by the National Security Council followed an in-depth review in late 2006 that laid out a series of projected improvements for this year, including progress in security, governance and the economy. But the latest assessment concluded that only "the kinetic piece" -- individual battles against Taliban fighters -- has shown substantial progress, while improvements in the other areas continue to lag, a senior administration official said.

This judgment reflects sharp differences between U.S. military and intelligence officials on where the Afghan war is headed. Intelligence analysts acknowledge the battlefield victories, but they highlight the Taliban's unchallenged expansion into new territory, an increase in opium poppy cultivation and the weakness of the government of President Hamid Karzai as signs that the war effort is deteriorating.

The contrasting views echo repeated internal disagreements over the Iraq war: While the military finds success in a virtually unbroken line of tactical achievements, intelligence officials worry about a looming strategic failure.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, November 24, 2007
Could this be the beginning?
posted by Clyde
8:22 AM

U.S. Navy steps up fuel deliveries to Gulf forces

The U.S. military has stepped up chartering of tankers and requests for extra fuel in the U.S. Central Command area, which includes the Gulf, shipping and oil industry sources say.

A Gulf oil industry source said the charters suggested there would be high naval activity, possibly including a demonstration to Iran that the U.S. Navy will protect the Strait of Hormuz oil shipping route during tensions over Tehran's nuclear programme.

The U.S. Navy's Military Sealift Command (MSC) has tendered for four tankers in November to move at least one million barrels of jet and ship fuel between Gulf ports, from Asia to the Gulf and to the Diego Garcia base, tenders seen by Reuters show.

It usually tenders for one or two tankers a month to supply Gulf operations, which include missions in Iraq.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Another loss for the war mongers
posted by Clyde
8:16 AM

Howard concedes defeat in Australian elections

Opposition leader Kevin Rudd greeted jubilant supporters Saturday night, as he promised changes in environmental, education and workplace policies as Australia's new prime minister.

"I will be a prime minister for all Australians," he told the cheering crowd. "Let us be the generation that seizes the opportunity of today to invest in the Australia of tomorrow. That's the mission statement we have as the next government of this country."

He added, "I want to do it with all of us working together."

Rudd, 50, is the head of Australia's center-left Labor Party. Earlier Saturday, conservative Prime Minister John Howard officially conceded that the Labor Party had gained a majority of seats in parliament and would replace his center-right Liberal-National coalition as the government.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, November 23, 2007
These are our friends and allies?
posted by Wally
10:03 AM

The Bush family has long maintained close ties with the Saudi royal family, and Dubya continues to call the Saudi's allies and friends despite all the evidence to the contrary. While he may never have given a backrub to any of them, he is seen often enough holding hands with them.


(click picture for larger image from the White House website)

The fact that 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 came from Saudi Arabia never phased him. Nor did the fact that the mastermind of the Cole bombing was a Saudi. Or that at least 15 of the 19 people indicted in the Khobar Towers bombing were Saudis. At least 3 of those responsible for the 1998 Embassy bombings were Saudis. In spite of all of that, Bush has never stopped holding hands with the Saudi's, even while invading their neighbors.

Meanwhile, the Bush administration has been ramping up the rhetoric about invading Iran because they are probably interested in developing nukes some time in the future and 2) they are sending fighters into Iraq to help the insurgency. While the first of those is problematic - regardless of which nation - anyone developing nukes is a legitimate concern, the latter issue only serves to highlight the Middle East hypocricy regarding the Saudis.
More than 40% of the foreign fighters who entered Iraq to join the insurgency in the past year were citizens of Saudi Arabia, America's key partner in the Middle East, according to detailed information seized from a camp used by them. Documents and computers found by the US army at Sinjar, on the Iraqi-Syrian border, revealed that the other single largest group came from Libya, which is now being rehabilitated as a reliable western ally.
So, the two greatest sources of foreign insurgents in Iraq come from our "allies"? And we still call them our allies why?
The captured data has been described as an intelligence treasure trove that included biographical details and the hometowns of the more than 700 fighters who entered Iraq since August 2006. Of those 307, or 41%, were Saudis and 137, or 18%, Libyans, senior US military sources told the New York Times.
41%, that's higher than Bush's approval rating. Maybe that's why he likes them.
The documents, found in September, showed that the third-largest source of foreign fighters was Yemen, with 68, followed by Algeria, 64, Morocco, 50, Tunisia, 38, Jordan, 14, Turkey, six, and Egypt, two. These figures seem to corroborate suggestions of a worrying increase in jihadi activity across north Africa, where armed groups from Libya, Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco have united under the banner of al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb.
While I don't believe that there are zero Iranians fighting against us in Iraq, I find it strange that Bush and Cheney want to invade them, but have nothing but love and kisses for the Saudis, who are number one on that, and so many other "terror" lists.

What could possibly be the motivation for this Overwhelming Insane Loyalty?

Why does Bush love terrorists?

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:30 AM

Looks like Dubya finally found something he's qualified to do. Come up with a caption or a slogan for him to use as spokesman for Bush's baked beans.


Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, November 22, 2007
Money with a conscience
posted by Clyde
5:30 AM

The future of the corporation

LAST WEEK, superinvestor Warren Buffett, America's second richest man, testified before the Senate Finance Committee on the subject of why people like him can well afford to pay taxes. In fact, Buffett is ceasing to be among the very wealthiest because he is giving most of his fortune away to philanthropies while he is still alive.

"Dynastic wealth, the enemy of a meritocracy, is on the rise," Buffett told the senators. "Equality of opportunity has been on the decline. A progressive and meaningful estate tax is needed to curb the movement of a democracy toward a plutocracy."

Buffett also proposed higher taxes on the wealthy in order to give working people a break on their payroll taxes, which now cost three Americans in four more than they pay in income taxes. And he supports taxing hedge fund bonuses at the same rate as ordinary income, so that billionaire hedge fund managers don't pay taxes at a lower rate than the people who clean their offices.

The conservatives on the committee were somewhat nonplussed, since Buffett is a poster boy for capitalist entrepreneurship. He isn't supposed to hold such views. And indeed, few Americans of great wealth do.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Republicans don't win elections, they have to steal them
posted by Clyde
5:22 AM

Opponents of California Ballot Initiative Seek Inquiry

The chairman of a committee formed to fight a ballot initiative to change how California's electoral college votes are apportioned has asked the city attorney here to investigate a report that a group collecting signatures for the initiative has offered food to homeless people in exchange for signing the petitions.

The Republican-supported initiative would replace California's winner-take-all system of allocating its 55 electoral college votes with one that allots the votes by Congressional district.

(snip)

Mr. Steyer's letter, dated Nov. 19, stems from an article in The Los Angeles Downtown News that detailed reporters' observations of signature gatherers asking homeless people on the city's notorious Skid Row for their signatures to help qualify the electoral vote initiative and three others, as well as asking them to fill out voter registration cards.

In exchange, the paper reported, homeless people and those in nearby shelters were given Snickers bars, instant noodles and other snack foods.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, November 21, 2007
How Bush's Pentagon Supports the Troops
posted by Wally
3:36 PM

By making them pay back their "Signing Bonus" if they fail to complete their tour of service due to things like bullet wounds, missing limbs, brain damage, etc. You can't make this shit up. Nobody is heartless and evil enough to pull shit like this, with the exception of Pentagon policy-makers and ditto-head freepers supporting the troops by slapping yellow ribbons on the back of their SUVs.
Jordan Fox received a $10,000 signing bonus when he joined the Army. The Mt. Lebanon man served his country in Iraq, where as a sniper he survived machine gun battles and a roadside bomb that knocked him unconscious and blinded him in his right eye.

The injury forced the military to send him home. A few weeks later, Fox received a bill from the Department of Defense, saying he owes the military nearly $3,000 from his original enlistment bonus because he couldn't fulfill three months of his commitment.

This is apparently not an isolated bureaucratic foul-up. The military is allegedly demanding that thousands of wounded service personnel give back signing bonuses because they are unable to serve out their commitments.

To get people to sign up, the military gives enlistment bonuses - up to $30,000 in some cases. Now men and women who have lost arms, legs, eyesight, hearing and can no longer serve are being ordered to pay some of that money back.
Aside from being a purely evil thing to do, what the fuck are these military bureaucrats and policy-makers thinking? Do they think soldiers are going to still be enticed to re-up in order to get a signing bonus that they'll have to repay if they get shot up or blown up? Do they think kids are going to sign up based on this?

I know a lot of high ranking military leaders have resigned or been forced out because of Bush, Cheney and Rummy Axis of Idiocy, but are the remaining leaders really that fucking stupid to think this is a good way to cut expenses? If so, let's bring our front line soldiers back home and put them in charge, and put the Caseys and Patreauses on the front line. Let them take the bombs and bullets. They make much more money and much higher bonuses, so the military will save even more money when they have to pay them back.

Support the Troops. Bring them home. In one piece.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

What are the conservatives most interested in?
posted by Wally
9:17 AM

For those of you who may not have heard of it, Conservapedia is just like Wikipidia, except without that pesky "unbiased, fact-based" slant that Wiki for the most part adheres to. If you're a freeper, neo-con, or ditto-head, Conservapedia is the place to go for rightwing information.

So what is it that these good upstanding god-fearing family-values pro-life christian patriots are most interested in? According to Conservapedia's own statistics, the top 10 most viewed pages are:

Larry Craig must be proud.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Pop Quiz: 77 = a) Bush's IQ. b) Percent of Americans worried about the country. C) All of the above
posted by Wally
7:31 AM

According to a recent survey, most Americans are happy in their personal lives, but over 3/4 are worried about the country.
Most in the U.S. say they are personally happy and feel in control of their lives and finances, according to an extensive Associated Press-Yahoo! News survey on the mood of voters. Beneath the surface, though, personal and political discontent is bubbling.

There is a widespread unease—shared by 77 percent - that the country has meandered off in the wrong direction. Nearly all Democrats and more than six in 10 Republicans think the country has taken the wrong course. And although almost half express interest and hope in the upcoming elections, a third voice frustration—particularly Republicans

Stirred in are warning signs for Republican candidates: Democrats seething after nearly seven years under President Bush are happier and more psyched up about this election than Republicans.

More Democrats than Republicans say they are hopeful about the voting, 54 percent to 39 percent, and more of them are interested in it. Republicans are more likely to say the election leaves them frustrated and bored.
1/20/2009

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:27 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link below to submit your caption of this turkey and the bird he's looking at.


Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Freedom Watch spent $15 Million selling "the surge" to the American people. Now they're test marketing a new "Invade Iran" campaign
posted by Wally
8:09 AM

Like Yogi Berra said, "it's like deja vu all over again". The administration sold us the Iraq invasion the same way advertising firms sell us the idea that "Coke adds life" or that wearing Axe will make you irresistable to women - using focus groups and massive marketing campaigns with no regard for the truth. Since it worked so well there, of course they're using the same techniques again to sell us on their next adventure.
The hawkish advocacy group (Freedom Watch) recently rolled out a multi-million dollar ad blitz in support of the troop surge in Iraq. It's now test marketing language that could be used to sell a war with Iran.

Laura Sonnenmark is a focus group regular. "I've been asked to talk about orange juice, cell phone service, furniture," the Fairfax County, Virginia-based children's book author and Democratic Party volunteer says. But when she was called by a focus group organizer for a prospective assignment earlier this month, she was told the questions this time would be about something "political."

On the appointed day, she drove to the offices of Martin Focus Groups in Alexandria, Virginia, knowing she would be paid $150 for two hours of her time. After joining a half dozen other women in a conference room, she found, to her surprise, that she had been called in to help some of the country's most prominent hawks test-market language that could be used to sell a war against Iran to the American public. "The whole basis of the whole thing was, 'we're going to go into Iran and what do we have to do to get you guys to along with it,'" Sonnenmark, 49, tells Mother Jones.

The client paying for the focus group session, according to Sonnemark, was Freedom's Watch, a high-powered, well-connected advocacy group that launched a $15 million ad campaign this summer in support of the surge of American troops in Iraq. Among the group's leadership: former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer and Bradley A. Blakeman, a former deputy assistant to President Bush. The focus group session suggests that Freedom's Watch may be looking beyond Iraq and expanding its mission to building support for military action against Iran.
Anyone paying attention shouldn't be surprised by this, but what is most frightening is the idea that the American people might very well be gullible enough to fall for it again. We know Congress is that stupid, but will we, as Americans, allow them to let it happen? Will the media finally stand up and do their jobs and inform the general populace of what's really going on? Unfortunately, I doubt it.

War begins with Dubya

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Snotty Scotty Comes Clean
posted by Wally
7:42 AM

Scott McClellan's Book Coming in April -- Admits Wrongdoing in Clearing Rove and Libby in CIA Leak Case

To no one's surprise in a world where top White House aides with any president eventually write a book about it, former Press Sectetary Scott McClellan will be coming out with his volume in April.

"The most powerful leader in the world had called upon me to speak on his behalf and help restore credibility he lost amid the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. So I stood at the White house briefing room podium in front of the glare of the klieg lights for the better part of two weeks and publicly exonerated two of the senior-most aides in the White House: Karl Rove and Scooter Libby.

"There was one problem. It was not true.

"I had unknowingly passed along false information. And five of the highest ranking officials in the administration were involved in my doing so: Rove, Libby, the vice President, the President's chief of staff, and the president himself."
For his admitted complicity in lying the country into an illegal war and obstructing the investigation into this lying, what will his punishment be? He's going to make millions off of his book and speaking tours, of course. That'll sure be a great deterrent for the next guy. The only ones who will ever pay any price for the crimes of this administration will be the innocents who were victimized by it.

On the other hand, after having the temerity to come clean and expose the truth about these guys, I would advise Scotty to watch his back and avoid flying in small planes.

LIARS

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, November 19, 2007
Despite the lack of balls, Dems are still popular.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:55 PM

Democratic Party's Image More Positive Than GOP's

According to the latest USA Today/Gallup poll, Americans are much more positive in their assessments of the Democratic Party than of the Republican Party -- consistent with a trend Gallup has measured since April 2006. Over the past several months, the public's ratings of the Republican Party have grown slightly more positive. The vast majority of Republicans and Democrats rate their respective parties favorably, while independents have a more positive than negative view of the Democratic Party, and a more negative than positive view of the Republican Party.

One more year!

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

I feel safer already
posted by Wally
7:43 AM

Every time another one of Dubya's appointees abandons ship, it makes me feel a little better about the state of the nation. I'd rather go without a government - let things slip into anarchy, chaos, and pandemonium - than have the Bush/Cheney people snooping through my email, credit records, phone calls, medical records, etc, whittling away at my Constitutionally guaranteed rights and freedoms, and having their thugs taze me and haul me away for questioning why these rights are being violated.

This time is especially comforting, since it's Bush's top advisor on Homeland Security who is bailing out. My homeland feels more secure in her absence.
Fran Townsend, President Bush's top White House-based adviser on terrorism and homeland security, has resigned, it was announced Monday.

Her departure continues an exodus of key Bush aides and confidants, with his two-term presidency in the final 15 months. Top aide Karl Rove, along with press secretary Tony Snow and senior presidential adviser Dan Bartlett, left earlier this year.
Like a hurricane alley resident watching "Brownie" resign, or a soldier hearing about Rummy walking out, or an attorney seeing Gonzo being shoved out the door, I feel a reprieve from the ineptitude and cronyism, if only temporarily. I suspect that they'll be replaced with another incompetent retarded Bush loyalist, but at least there is the brief interlude when there is a vacuum - when nobody is there to fuck things up even worse than they already are.

Rat. Ship. You know the drill.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:38 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption.

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

4 years later
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:37 AM

U.S. struggles to restore Iraq water

The water tankers arrive twice a week in this parched village surrounded by fallow fields stretching into the horizon. The town's wells still pump out a flow, but few villagers dare drink from it unless in desperation.

At the gate of Kayria Fayhan's home, 250 gallons of the trucked-in cargo fill a metal tank for cooking and drinking, sometimes for washing up if itching from the groundwater becomes unbearable.

Even the "clean" water from the tanker is a gamble on some weeks. "They say the water is clean, but sometimes the water is green," Fayhan said. "Sometimes, there's rust floating in it."

Despite the fact that Iraq and U.S. officials have made water projects among their top priorities, the percentage of Iraqis without access to decent water supplies has risen from 50 percent to 70 percent since the start of the U.S.-led war, according to an analysis by Oxfam International last summer. The portion of Iraqis lacking decent sanitation was even worse -- 80 percent.

Stay the course!!

Permalink :: 0 comments ::