Home

Columnists

Merchandise

Other Stuff

 

 Air America Radio

 Head-On Radio Network

 Search dubyaD40.com

Google


Search Web
Search dubyaD40.com

 Ads by The Google

 Take Action

 Recent Posts

 Archives

 Today's Reason To Drink



 Want to link to us?


It's easy to do.  Right click on the image below and choose "Copy."  Then paste it on your site.


 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 Today's Topics

 
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
What's $150 Billion between friends?
posted by Wally
9:19 AM

And who is Cheney's friend, if not Halliburton subsidiary KBR?
GAO: Army improperly awarded $150B contract

The Army improperly awarded one of its largest contracts — a 10-year, $150 billion deal to support U.S. troops around the world — and should reconsider its decision, a government agency said Tuesday.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) ruled the Army didn't give enough weight to Pentagon auditors' concerns about the past performance of KBR, which has been the only company providing troop support for six years under the current contract. It was one of three companies selected to share the new contract, which was awarded in June and was supposed to take effect this month.

The GAO said the Army also gave Fluor Corp. "unequal treatment" when awarding the new contract. The Army approved Fluor's proposal even though the proposal relied on different assumptions than those listed in the contract solicitation — a shortcoming that hurt other bidders' proposals, the GAO said.

Government auditors have repeatedly criticized KBR for overcharging and other mismanagement of its work in Iraq. KBR also is a favorite target of congressional Democrats because it used to be a subsidiary of Halliburton, which Dick Cheney once headed.
Your tax dollars at work

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Same ship, new rat
posted by Wally
8:36 AM

Longtime Bush Adviser Karen Hughes Leaving State Dept
Karen Hughes, who led efforts to improve the U.S. image abroad and was one of President Bush's last remaining advisers from the close circle of Texas aides, will leave the government at the end of the year.

Hughes told The Associated Press that she plans to quit her job as undersecretary of state and return to Texas, although improving the world's view of the United States is a "long-term challenge" that will outlast her.

"This will take a number of years," Hughes said in an interview Tuesday.
I'm guessing that the world's view of the United States will begin to improve on or about January 21, 2009. It will take a long time, but that will be the beginning.
She worked with Bush since the 1990s, first as director of communications while he was governor of Texas, from 1995 to 2000.
Another long-timer like Fredo Gonzales, she was kept around far more because of her fawning puppy-like loyalty and bject adoration of Dubya than for her competence.

Good riddance

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Justifying Torture
posted by Wally
6:34 AM

You CAN'T justify torture. There is no justification for torture. The Constitution explicitly forbids torture in this country. That long haired bearded hippie guy who's teachings this administration and most Republicans allegedly follow - you know, the one who's book they quote from ad infinitum - could never, ever, justify torture, even though he was on the receiving end of it himself. He couldn't even justify it for those at who's hands he suffered so violently - preferring to "turn the other cheek". Perhaps the teachings of Jesus no longer apply? Perhaps that book is outdated? That could have some serious ramifications across the political spectrum.

But I digress. To my point, Bush feels that neither Jesus's teachings nor the Constitution, nor the basic rules of humanity apply to him or his chosen people. To him, torture is just fine and dandy as long as it's done to other people, and it helps him achieve his ends. Granted, no one is quite certain what those ends are, but both his CIA appointee and his new nominee to replace Gonzo as Attorney General think torturing people is completely acceptable and a normal way of doing business.
The director of the US Central Intelligence Agency has defended the administration's rendition program, in which terrorism suspects are transported to secret prisons in countries with less stringent interrogation rules.
Translation: where they don't have a problem torturing people.
"Our programs are as lawful as they are valuable," said General Michael Hayden.

"These rendition, detention, and interrogation programs are small, carefully run operations," he said, adding that less than a third of the detainees "have required any special methods of questioning".
So torture is not only acceptable, it's "valuable" too? Amazing. How many is "less than a third"? Is that more than zero? Is even one acceptable?

That's the current head of the CIA, already in office. Bush's nominee to head up the Dept of Justice (the group that oversees domestic law enforcement - that's you and me) isn't much better. In his job interview with a Senate committee, he dodged and weaved and danced around it, but ultimately refused to clarify his stance on the issue of torture.
Atty. Gen.-designate Michael B. Mukasey, adopting a middle ground on an issue that has become central to his nomination, said coercive interrogation methods, including a form of simulated drowning, were "over the line" and "repugnant." But he declined to say whether he thought so-called water-boarding was a form of torture that would be illegal in all cases.
Oh? Are there cases where torture is legal in this country? Do tell Mr. Mukasey, we're all ears.
"Mukasey was nominated to be the chief law enforcement officer, not the nation's ethics advisor," said Jennifer Daskal, U.S. advocacy director for Human Rights Watch. "He should not be confirmed if he cannot say that water-boarding, a form of mock drowning that has been prosecuted as torture since 1902, is illegal."

"Judge Mukasey makes the point that in the law, precision matters. So do honesty and openness. And on those counts, he falls far short," said Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.).
Perhaps he would be more forthcoming with more specific answers if he were asked these questions using more "enhanced interrogation techniques?

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:26 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of the Dick and Curious George on a video-teleconference about the CA wildfires.

Permalink :: 6 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Giving Blackwater immunity over here so we don't have to over there?
posted by Wally
12:20 PM

Last month we were given a glimpse of how things work at Condoleeza Rice's State Department. When Blackwater guards went on a shooting rampage and killed 17 Iraqi civilians, and were immediately airlifted out of the country and brought back home - not to be punished for the crimes they committed, but to protect them from being punished.

Yesterday we learned that not only were these men brought home to protect them from Iraqi prosecution, but that the State Department also gave them immunity from prosecution here. According to this Wash Post story
Potential prosecution of Blackwater guards allegedly involved in the shooting deaths of 17 Iraqi civilians last month may have been compromised because the guards received immunity for statements they made to State Department officials investigating the incident, federal law enforcement officials said yesterday.

FBI agents called in to take over the State Department's investigation two weeks after the Sept. 16 shootings cannot use any information gleaned during questioning of the guards by the department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security, which is charged with supervising security contractors.

Some of the Blackwater guards have subsequently refused to be interviewed by the FBI, citing promises of immunity from State, one law enforcement official said.
Unfortunately for the Blackwater (and other private and military) personnel still in Iraq, the Iraqi parliament doesn't have such a dim regard for Iraqi civilian life, nor such high regard for the foreigners occupying their land acting above the law.
The Iraqi government on Tuesday approved draft legislation lifting immunity for foreign private security companies, sending the measure to parliament, a spokesman said.

The government's decision followed reports that the State Department has promised Blackwater bodyguards immunity from prosecution in its investigation of last month's shooting.

Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said the draft law approved Tuesday would overturn an immunity order known as Decree 17 that was issued by L. Paul Bremer, who ran the American occupation government until June 2004.

Al-Dabbagh did not single out Blackwater but said: "According to this law, all security companies will subjected to the Iraqi criminal law and must obey all the country's legal regulations such as: registration, customs, visas, etcetera."
Boy, you'd almost think they were a sovereign nation. Now might be a good time for any Blackwater (or other private security company) employees to start updating their resumes and looking for work elsewhere. Only problem is, when they come home it will mean we'll be facing Bush's own personal mercenary militia over here instead of over there. And Bush's administration has just granted them immunity....

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Start the draft. NOW!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
12:16 PM

I swear to God, we must be the single dumbest fucking country on the planet. Hands down:

Bomb Iran, majority of Americans says in new poll

Despite President Bush's perpetually abysmal approval ratings, his increasingly hostile rhetoric against Iran has drummed up enough fear of a "nuclear holocost" or a World War III that a majority of Americans are in favor of a US strike against the country aimed a curtailing its apparent nuclear ambitions, a new poll shows.

The Zogby International survey shows 52 percent of Americans would support a strike on Iran, while 53 percent expect President Bush to launch such an attack before the end of his second term. Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton is voters' No. 1 choice to deal with Iran, with 21 percent saying they would like to see her take on Tehran from the White House. Republican Rudy Giuliani was voters' second choice, with 15 percent.

Just 29 percent of Americans think the US should not attack Iran, with one in five people unsure about military action. Of those who would support a strike, 28 percent believe military action should wait until the next president is in office, while 23 percent want to see Bush let lose US missiles against Iran.

. . .

"It is utterly stunning that, after the great difficulties we have clearly faced in Iraq (a situation far from finished, by the way), that an absolute majority would favor a strike on Iran at this time," writes Dr. Steven Taylor at PoliBlog. "Even if we assume that the die-hard 25%-30% who still approve of the way the President is doing his job also are in favor of such a strike, where do the other 27%-22% come from to get the pro-strike total to 52%?"

Retarded

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

A Bargain At Any Price?
posted by Clyde
8:11 AM

2007 Spying Said to Cost $50 Billion

The director of national intelligence will disclose today that national intelligence activities amounting to roughly 80 percent of all U.S. intelligence spending for the year cost more than $40 billion, according to sources on Capitol Hill and inside the administration.

The disclosure means that when military spending is added, aggregate U.S. intelligence spending for fiscal 2007 exceeded $50 billion, according to these sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the total remains classified.

Adm. Mike McConnell will announce that the fiscal 2007 national intelligence program figure, classified up to now, is being made public at the urging of the Sept. 11 commission and the insistence of Congress, which turned the commission's recommendation into law. The commission's plan was to have the president make the figure public each year.

While the budget figure released by McConnell excludes intelligence programs for the separate military services, it includes the budgets of the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the FBI's intelligence programs, the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research and the major Defense Department intelligence collection agencies.

(No Privacy Left Behind)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, October 29, 2007
HaHaHa!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
3:40 PM

What goes around...

FEMA Spokesman John P. ''Pat'' Philbin Loses Spy Job Offer

The man who staged a fake Federal Emergency Management Agency new conference has lost a chance to be National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell's top public information officer.

John P. ''Pat'' Philbin, FEMA's external affairs director, who had been scheduled to move into the new job on Monday, will not be getting it after last week's phony news conference. The staged question-and-answer session was harshly criticized by both the White House and Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, whose department oversees FEMA.

''We do not normally comment on personnel matters,'' DNI spokesman Ross Feinstein said Monday. ''However, we can confirm that Mr. Philbin is not, nor is he scheduled to be, the director of public affairs for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.''

Feinstein said earlier that Philbin's job change had been put on hold while McConnell reviewed his record....

A half-dozen questions were asked at the event -- by FEMA staff members posing as reporters. Philbin was among the six questioners, according to The Washington Post. The questions included: ''Are you happy with FEMA's response so far?''...

Heckuva Job!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

The Surge is working!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:20 PM

Ummm....nevermind:

U.S. General injured in Iraq

U.S. Army Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Dorko was injured when a roadside bomb exploded near his vehicle in Baghdad, Pentagon sources said.

Dorko is believed to the be the highest-ranking military officer injured in the war. He suffered shrapnel wounds and has been evacuated to Germany, the sources said.

Dorko took command of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Gulf Region Division in Baghdad on October 10, according to the Corps of Engineers Web site.

Iraq'd

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

More retirements...
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
12:18 PM

Tancredo will not seek re-election

A spokesman for Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) confirmed Monday that the congressman will not seek another term in Congress in 2008, regardless of his fate in the presidential race.

Tancredo's exit, first reported by the Rocky Mountain News after the Colorado Rockies lost baseball's World Series on Sunday night, adds another GOP retirement to a growing list.

Tancredo's district is conservative, with President Bush having taken 60 percent of the vote there in 2004, but the state has trended toward Democrats in recent years.

2008

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

'I Don't Think This Place Is Worth Another Soldier's Life'
posted by Wally
6:52 AM

After 14 months in a Baghdad district torn by mounting sectarian violence, members of one U.S. unit are tired, bitter and skeptical.

The streets of Sadiyah are deserted again. To the right, power lines slump down into the dirt. To the left, what was a soccer field is now a pasture of trash, combusting and smoking in the sun. Packs of skinny wild dogs trot past walls painted with slogans of sectarian hate.

A bomb crater blocks one lane, so they cross to the other side, where houses are blackened by fire, shops crumbled into bricks. The remains of a car bomb serve as hideous public art. Sgt. Victor Alarcon's Humvee rolls into a vast pool of knee-high brown sewage water -- the soldiers call it Lake Havasu, after the Arizona spring-break party spot -- that seeps in the doors of the vehicle and wets his boots.

"When we first got here, all the shops were open. There were women and children walking out on the street," Alarcon said this week. "The women were in Western clothing. It was our favorite street to go down because of all the hot chicks."

(snip)

Asked if the American endeavor here was worth their sacrifice -- 20 soldiers from the battalion have been killed in Baghdad -- Alarcon said no: "I don't think this place is worth another soldier's life."

We don't think it's worth an other civilian's life either. It's way past time to bring them home. Reid, Pelosi, get with the program and pretend you're in the majority. End the damn war or step down and let someone else do the job before one more life is wasted in Bush's foolish adventure.

3,840

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:31 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya entering the Roosevelt Room of the White House.

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, October 28, 2007
Show me zie papers old man!
posted by Clyde
7:04 AM

Feds Strike ID Deal Over NY Licenses

The Bush administration and New York agreed Saturday on a compromise creating a more secure driver's license for U.S. citizens and allowing illegal immigrants to get a version.

New York is the fourth state to reach such an agreement, after Arizona, Vermont and Washington. The issue is pressing for border states, where new and tighter rules are soon to go into effect for crossings.

The deal comes about one month after New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer announced a plan whereby illegal immigrants with a valid foreign passport could obtain a license.

The agreement with the Homeland Security Department will create a three-tier license system in New York, the largest state to sign on so far to the government's post-Sept. 11 effort to make identification cards more secure.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Choosing up sides!
posted by Clyde
6:55 AM

Iran courting Arab countries to blunt U.S. hostility

Iran is intensifying its efforts win over its Arab neighbors with a campaign of high-level diplomatic visits, lucrative investment deals and a series of public statements that call for Muslim unity in the face of U.S. and Israeli "aggression" in the Middle East .

The goal, experts say, is to reassure Sunni Muslim leaders that they have nothing to fear from their Shiite Muslim neighbor's ascension as a regional power- and to make sure no Arab state backs a U.S. strike on Iranian nuclear facilities.

So far, the campaign has achieved mixed results: While Arab rulers publicly support stronger Arab-Persian ties, they still harbor deep-seated fears about Iran's long-term ambitions. They also face strong U.S. pressure to keep Tehran isolated.

"If the U.S. struck Iran , the Arab world would take a position of 'positive neutrality'— they would observe, but they wouldn't join because the Arabs know Iran's reaction could harm them in their own countries," said Mohamed el Said Abdel Mo 'men, a professor of Iranian studies at Ain Shams University in Cairo . "They believe the Iranian threat, in its current size, is more manageable than it would be after a strike."

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, October 27, 2007
Tell us again about how the military is not stretched to the breaking point!
posted by Clyde
6:09 AM

MRAPs going to Iraq on Russian cargo planes

The Air Force has been forced to use Russian commercial cargo jets to rush mine-resistant ambush-protected vehicles from the U.S. to Iraq because it does not have enough C-5 and C-17 planes to do the job, the service's top civilian official said recently.

Air Force Secretary Michael W. Wynne said at an Oct. 24 House Armed Services Committee hearing that American reliance on Russian Antonov jumbo jets to move critical war supplies indicates that the Air Force may need more than its current 300 C-5s and C-17s.

"We are now sharing the mission of flying MRAPs over to Iraq between C-17s and Antonov airplanes," Wynne said. "Did [we] truly envision that we would fly war supplies with Russian-made airplanes? I don't know."

MRAP vehicles are the Defense Department's top procurement priority, and the department this month ordered an additional 2,400 to help protect American servicemembers from roadside bombs in Iraq. The department has said it needs 15,274 MRAPs for all the services.

(Link)

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Looks like the Republicans are getting their Cold War back
posted by Clyde
5:21 AM

Russia could quickly resume missile output: general

Russia is capable of quickly resuming production of short and medium-range nuclear missiles, the commander of Russia's rocket forces said on Friday.

"If there is a political decision to make such a class of missile, then it is obvious that they will be made in Russia in the near future because we have everything we need," Colonel- General Nikolai Solovtsov was quoted by RIA news agency as saying.

"Today we are in (arms control) agreements so we act strictly within those agreements."

President Vladimir Putin told U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice this month that Russia would find it difficult to stay in the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), signed by Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan in December 1987.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wouldn't want a little thing like the truth getting in the way of a good time
posted by Clyde
5:14 AM

US Intelligence officials clamping down on release of intelligence estimates

National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell has reversed the recent practice of declassifying and releasing summaries of national intelligence estimates, a top U.S. intelligence official said Friday.

Knowing their words may be scrutinized outside the U.S. government chills analysts' willingness to provide unvarnished opinions and information, said David Shedd, a deputy to McConnell.

He told congressional aides and reporters that McConnell recently issued a directive making it more difficult to declassify the key judgments of national intelligence estimates, or NIEs, which are forward-looking analyses prepared for the White House and Congress that represent the consensus of the nation's 16 spy agencies on a single issue. The analysis comes from various sources including the CIA, the military and intelligence agencies inside federal departments.

Referring to the public release of the reports, Shedd said during a congressional briefing: "It affects the quality of what's written."

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, October 26, 2007
NY: Dutchess County on high alert this weekend
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
9:22 AM

Cheney to hunt in Dutchess County again

Vice President Dick Cheney is coming to Dutchess County again to go hunting, according to two sources familiar with his plans. Cheney will arrive Sunday night and head to a hunting club in Dutchess Monday morning.

Cheney is expected to arrive Sunday night at Stewart airport and travel to a hotel in Poughkeepsie, sources said.

On Monday morning, he is expected to leave Poughkeepsie and head to the Clove Valley Rod & Gun Club in LaGrangeville.

Motorists can expect road closures and considerable associated delays on Interstate 84 and Route 9 Sunday night, and on Route 55 and again on Interstate 84 on Monday. Depending on what time he travels Monday morning, his trip could disrupt school bus service in affected areas.

Cheney last visited Dutchess County in December, 2003, when he attended a fundraiser at the Pawling Mountain Club. His arrival shut down Interstate 84 for about an hour, including many crossings. On his departure, I-84 was closed again for about 20 minutes.

Gun control begins with Cheney

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Taking propaganda to the next level
posted by Wally
7:59 AM

When things are so bad that they can't trust even Fox News to give the side of the story exactly as they want it to, what does the Bush administration do? They make a phony press conference with their own phony reporters asking phony questions - and try to pawn it off as "news".
FEMA Meets the Press, Which Happens to Be . . . FEMA

FEMA has truly learned the lessons of Katrina. Even its handling of the media has improved dramatically. For example, as the California wildfires raged Tuesday, Vice Adm. Harvey E. Johnson, the deputy administrator, had a 1 p.m. news briefing.

Reporters were given only 15 minutes' notice of the briefing, making it unlikely many could show up at FEMA's Southwest D.C. offices. They were given an 800 number to call in, though it was a "listen only" line, the notice said -- no questions. Parts of the briefing were carried live on Fox News, MSNBC and other outlets.

(snip)

"And so I think what you're really seeing here is the benefit of experience, the benefit of good leadership and the benefit of good partnership," Johnson said, "none of which were present in Katrina." (Wasn't Michael Chertoff DHS chief then?) Very smooth, very professional. But something didn't seem right. The reporters were lobbing too many softballs. No one asked about trailers with formaldehyde for those made homeless by the fires. And the media seemed to be giving Johnson all day to wax on and on about FEMA's greatness.

Of course, that could be because the questions were asked by FEMA staffers playing reporters. We're told the questions were asked by Cindy Taylor, FEMA's deputy director of external affairs, and by "Mike" Widomski, the deputy director of public affairs. Director of External Affairs John "Pat" Philbin asked a question, and another came, we understand, from someone who sounds like press aide Ali Kirin.
While the Gulf Coast residents are still trying to piece together what's left of their former lives, while much of New Orleans is still uninhabitable after 2 years, while the wildfires continue to rage and Bush's photo-ops tie up traffic and interfere with firefighting and relief efforts and prevent people from trying get home or get aid - we know that FEMA has learned at least one lesson from Katrina. Why talk to "real" reporters who might ask uncomfortable questions when you can just stage the news. That way you can tell them exactly what you want them to hear, and let them broadcast it for you just like "real" news. Goebbels would be proud.

Heck of a job Harvey

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:24 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption


Permalink :: 6 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, October 25, 2007
Making a disaster area a disaster.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
3:36 PM

President's visit snarls traffic for RB returnees

Rancho Bernardo residents began their journey back home with a surprise today.

They were stuck in traffic for two to three hours sitting in their cars at a standstill because of President Bush's visit to their community.

Police and the CHP had blocked off Interstate 15 ramps to West Bernardo Drive, which leads to the recovery center that was opened yesterday. Cars lined up for miles on the freeway.
. . .

Fed up with waiting, Barbara Gandre said she needed to drive her 87-year-old mother home to pick up medication for her 89-year-old husband. Her mother just recovered from pneumonia in September and the family did not have masks to wear over their faces. They sat in their car with the windows rolled down because they only had a quarter tank of gas left.

Mr. Photo-op

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Somebody should buy Bush a map and uh such as...
posted by Wally
1:59 PM

Bush shows off his brilliant statesmanship by signing a Maritime Pact with Mongolia

Did Miss Miss SC, Teen USA contestant Caitlen Upton have Dubya specifically in mind when she said "uh, some, uh, people out there in our nation don't have maps and, uh, I believe that our, uh, education like such as...?" Like such as... Bush is in dire need of a freaking globe?

The State Department with great fanfare on Tuesday signed an agreement with landlocked Mongolia that will allow Mongolian ships to be boarded and searched if they are suspected of carrying weapons of mass destruction.

Mongolian ships? Below is a map of Mongolia.

Mongolia -- a vast land that's home to the Gobi Desert, windswept steppes and largely populated by nomadic yak herders -- has no navy at all and lies thousands of miles from open waters.
Those dastardly Mongols and their WMD carrying yaks!

Brilliant!

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Cold. Heartless. B@stard.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:58 AM

Cheney Nods Off During Meeting On Calif. Wildfires

Vice President Dick Cheney was caught on tape and caught off guard during a meeting with President Bush.

A news crew was taping a cabinet meeting at the White House as the president was giving a briefing on the California wildfires.

The news crew caught Cheney as he appeared to be nodding off.

Perhaps even the vice president needs a power nap once in awhile.

With video

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

$2.4 TRILLION
posted by Wally
7:02 AM

$8,000 for every man, woman, and child in America
That's your money literally being blown up in Iraq and Afghanistan
The cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could total $2.4 trillion in the next decade, according to a nonpartisan budget analysis issued Wednesday.

"We are on an unsustainable fiscal path, and something has to give," CBO director Peter Orszag said in presenting the estimates to the House Budget Committee at the request of its chairman, Rep. John Spratt, a South Carolina Democrat.

For the first time, the Congressional Budget Office also included interest in its calculations, because the wars have essentially been paid for with federal borrowing. Interest payments on spending so far would total $415 billion. Under the first scenario, there would be an additional $175 billion in interest payments, and under the second scenario, $290 billion in debt service would be added.
That's a total of $590 to $705 Billion in interest, or about 2,000 to 2,350 for every American. That's just the freaking interest on the loans. The Republicans and the White House refused to even consider that part of the cost of the war when they were selling us the war over the past 4 years. How happy are you with the idea of paying 2 grand to the Chinese for the money we borrowed so we could blow it up halfway around the world?

How excited are you about starting another one in Iran that will certainly be even more expensive?

So much for the "no more than $50 billion" worst case scenario the White House painted before we invaded. But they're hoping you'll forget about that rosey little prediction. In fact, as White House spokesbimbo Dana Perino said "What I can tell you is I'm not worried about the number." Of course not Dana, the people in the White House are making shitpiles of money off of this war through their stocks in companies like Halliburton, Blackwater, etc. They're not worried about driving the economy, or the country over a cliff. They can afford to pack up and move (perhaps to Bush's new 100,000 acre ranch in Paraquay).

The White House answer, aside from "not worrying about" blowing $8,000 of your money was quick to predictably to blame the outlandish cost on the Democrats, and in a backhanded way, the troops.
"Congress got a predictable answer to its leading question, which was clearly intended to artificially inflate war costs (by) politicians in Washington trying to manage our military commanders," said Sean Kevelighan, press secretary for the White House budget office.
One, it wasn't the Democrats who started the war (although they are complicit in that they haven't done anything to stop or slow it). Two, the CBO is a completely non-partisan organization. Even if it weren't, based on the way this administration's history of manipulating science, if anything, the numbers were fudged to make Bush's war look better than it really is. Third, he's suggesting that the military commanders mismanaged us into this mess, when in fact the politicians in Washington are supposed to manage the military commanders. That's why the Commander in Chief is a civilian and not a General. The military follows the policy of the civilian government, not the other way around. That's how it's supposed to work.

Or is Mr. Kevelighan suggesting that we live in a military dictatorship, and that Dubya is, in fact, a dictator? Just wondering.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Women tells Condi, "The blood of millions of Iraqis is on your hands"
posted by Wally
6:18 AM

Condoleezza Rice received a hostile greeting on Capitol Hill yesterday when an anti-war protester waved blood-coloured hands in her face and shouted "war criminal".

The secretary of state, America's top diplomat and one of the architects of President George W Bush's Iraq policy, had arrived to attend a Congressional hearing on developments in the Middle East.

Police hustled the woman away and she was one of three people detained and charged with disrupting the US Congress.
Of course, one of the others was arrested for holding up a "peace sign" with her hand. She didn't hold up a "sign". She didn't disrupt the hearing. She didn't say a word. All she did was hold up her hand with her two fingers extended in a peace sign.
Medea Benjamin remained in the hearing room and was asked to leave after flashing a peace sign with her fingers. She collected her belongings, left and was walking down the hall when 2 Capitol Police approached her and cuffed her.
That's all it takes to get arrested in America nowadays. What more needs to be said?

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Not a fake picture
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
3:45 PM

See it yourself at NY Times

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Guess who Fox News is blaming for the CA wildfires
posted by Wally
1:25 PM

Amazingly, this time it's NOT Bill Clinton's fault.
Nope, according to Fox News, the fires were started by (tell me you saw this coming) al Qaeda
As more than a million people escaped the flames, Fox News anchors couldn't help speculating about a terrorism link to the blazes ravaging southern California.

"I've heard some people talk about this a little bit to me, but have you heard anybody suggest that this could be some form of terrorism," Fox & Friends co-host Steve Doocy asked Wednesday morning.

Fox anchors returned to fanning the terror fears, digging up a four-year-old FBI memo and presenting it as new information relating to an al Qaeda link to the fires.

The memo was first reported by the Arizona Republic in July 2003, although a Fox anchor said it was reported "five days ago."
Just this one time, let's assume for the sake of argument that Fox is right, and it was al Qaeda that started the fires. Doesn't that shoot the hell out of Bush's argument about "fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them here"? What kind of an indictment is it on the Bush administration's ability to protect our homeland from terrorism if they've had this memo for over 4 years and couldn't stop the terror attack from happening?

Or could it just be that once again, Fox news is full of shit, stooping to another new low, using this natural disaster to fan the flames (so to speak) of fear in order to drum up support for their little god-king George.

It's Clinton's al Qaeda's Fault

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Conservative?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:17 PM

My ass:

Bush is the biggest spender since LBJ


George W. Bush, despite all his recent bravado about being an apostle of small government and budget-slashing, is the biggest spending president since Lyndon B. Johnson. In fact, he's arguably an even bigger spender than LBJ.

"He's a big government guy," said Stephen Slivinski, the director of budget studies at Cato Institute, a libertarian research group.

The numbers are clear, credible and conclusive, added David Keating, the executive director of the Club for Growth, a budget-watchdog group.

"He's a big spender," Keating said. "No question about it."

Borrow and spend Republican

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tap or Treat!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
11:22 AM

Wanna dress up like Larry Craig for Halloween? Here you go:


Just copy the above image, courtesy of these spooky tricksters, to your favorite image editing software program, enlarge, print, cut, and then tape or glue to a brown paper bag (this PDF version also works quite well). Complete the look with a pair of shiny wingtips, and you're ready to scare the hell out of every boy in your neighborhood!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

California is screwed
posted by Wally
7:52 AM

FEMA Vows Aggressive Effort on Wildfires
The Bush administration's disaster assistance chief promised no repeat of the Hurricane Katrina experience Wednesday, saying "this is a new FEMA" as Washington weighed options to help California wildfire victims.

"We're going to make sure this operation runs as smoothly as possible given the size of this disaster," David Paulison, head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, said when asked if people who lost homes can expect a more aggressive response than when Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast in late summer 2005.
Of course they can expect a more aggressive response from Bush - they're mostly white.

I can see the little tiny wheels spinning in Dubya's head "Hey, I got a idea. Get Brownie on the phone. Ya see, what we'll do is we'll pump the floodwaters from the gulf coast to California. hehheh. Ya see, we can use them to put out the fires."

Heck of a job

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

It's okay if Bush does it
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:39 AM

Saddam? Not so much...

Bush offers to bomb Kurds

The Bush Administration is considering air strikes, including cruise missiles, against the Kurdish rebel group PKK in northern Iraq.

The move would be an attempt to stave off a Turkish invasion of that country to fight the rebels.

President George Bush spoke with Turkish President Abdullah Gul by phone yesterday in an effort to ease the crisis.

And Prime Minister John Howard says the tensions on the Turkey-Iraq border will not help the west's battle for democracy in Iraq.

Mr Howard said there was some recent evidence that US forces were making headway in their battle against al-Qaeda in Iraq following the US troop surge.

Clusterfuckitall

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

White House cuts 10 out of 14 pages of CDC testimony on climate change - because who do you trust with your health more than the Bush administration?
posted by Wally
6:44 AM

The White House severely edited congressional testimony given Tuesday by the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on the impact of climate change on health, removing specific scientific references to potential health risks, according to two sources familiar with the documents.

"It was eviscerated," said a CDC official, familiar with both versions, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the review process.

The official said that while it is customary for testimony to be changed in a White House review, these changes were particularly "heavy-handed," with the document cut from its original 14 pages to four. It was six pages as presented to the Senate committee.

The White House in the past has said it has only sought to provide a balanced view of the climate issue.
Just like Fox news provides a balanced view. Balanced in the palms of oil executives' and defense contractors' hands.

Redacted

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:23 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya getting wet.


Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, October 23, 2007
John Fogarty on Letterman
posted by Wally
2:39 PM

John Fogarty started writing protest songs for Credence Clearwater Revival during the Vietnam War (Fortunate Son, Who'll Stop the Rain, etc). It's good to see that he hasn't lost his touch, or his passion, after more than 35 years.


Long Dark Night - John Fogerty

George is in the jungle
knockin' on the door
come to get your children
wants to have a war

Come on, lord you'd better run,
be a long dark night before this thing is done

Brownie's in the outhouse
Katrina on the line
government's a disaster
but George, he says it's fine

Come on, lord you'd better run,
be a long dark night before this thing is done

Rummy's in the kitchen messin' with the pan
Dickie's in the back stealing everything he can
Come on, Lord you'd better run,
be a long dark night before this thing is done

You better run, you better run,
Lord you better run, Lord you better run,

Runnin' down the highway
shoutin' to the Lord
George's got religion
and you know he can't afford more, yeah

Come on, Lord you'd better run
be a long dark night before this thing is done
be a long dark night before this thing is done, oh Lord


I Can't Take It No More - John Fogerty

I can't take it no more
I can't take it no more
I'm sick and tired of your dirty little war
I can't take it no more

You know you lied about the casualties
You know you lied about the WMD's
You know you lied about the detainees
All over this world

Stop talking about staying the course
You keep a-beating that old dead horse
You know you lied about how we went to war
I can't take it no more

I can't take it
I can't take it

I bet you never saw the old school yard
I bet you never saw the national guard
Your daddy wrote a check and there you are
Another fortunate son

I can't take it no more
I can't take it no more
I'm sick and tired of your dirty little war
I can't take it no more

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Amen!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:30 AM

Giuliani Defends, Employs Priest Accused of Molesting Teens


Presidential candidate Rudolph Giuliani hired a Catholic priest to work in his consulting firm months after the priest was accused of sexually molesting two former students and an altar boy and told by the church to stop performing his priestly duties.

The priest, Monsignor Alan Placa, a longtime friend of Giuliani and the priest who officiated at his second wedding to Donna Hanover, continues to work at Giuliani Partners in New York, to the outrage of some of his accusers and victims' groups, which have begun to protest at Giuliani campaign events.

"This man did unjust things, and he's being protected and employed and taken care of. It's not a good thing," said one of the accusers, Richard Tollner, who says Placa molested him repeatedly when he was a student at a Long Island, N.Y. Catholic boys high school in 1975.

At a campaign appearance in Milwaukee last week, Giuliani continued to defend Placa, who he described to reporters as a close friend for 39 years.

Bless you my son!

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

A tale of two decisions (or, how the FBI gets you to confess)
posted by Wally
7:48 AM

FBI threatens to have man's family tortured unless he confesses to crime he did not commit. Court orders torture threat kept secret and asks that nobody mention it in public.
The long and the short of it was that an Egpytian national, Abdallah Higazy, was staying in a hotel in New York City on September 11 and the hotel emptied out when the planes hit the towers. The hotel later found in the closet of his room a device that allows you to communicate with airline pilots. Investigators thought this guy had something to do with 9/11 so they questioned him. According to Higazi, the investigators coerced him into confessing to a role in 9/11. Higazi first adamantly denied any involvement with 9/11 and could not believe what was happening to him. Then, he says, the investigator said his family would go through hell in Egypt, where they torture people like Saddam Hussein. Higazy then realized he had a choice: he could continue denying the radio was his and his family suffers ungodly torture in Egypt or he confesses and his family is spared. Of course, by confessing, Higazy's life is worth garbage at that point, but ... well, that's why coerced confessions are outlawed in the United States.

So Higazy "confesses" and he's processed by the criminal justice system. His future is quite bleak. Meanwhile, an airline pilot later shows up at the hotel and asks for his radio back. This is like something out of the movies. The radio belonged to the pilot, not Higazy, and Higazy was free to go, the victim of horrible timing. Higazi was innocent! He next sued the hotel and the FBI agent for coercing his confession. The bottom line in the Court of Appeals: Higazy has a case and may recover damages for this injustice.
The opinion was posted on a couple of legal blogs (see link below for the full article and details), and very shortly thereafter the Court of Appeals pulled the opinion from their site, and called the legal blogs and told them to pull down the posts. The blogs (thankfully) refused.

The next day the opinion was re-issued online, this time omitting the part about how the FBI used the threat of torture in order to get the false confession.
That's how they do it, folks. If a foreign national is suspected of terrorist activity, the FBI will threaten to have a brutal foreign government punish his family. And punishment in a place like Egypt is not like punishment here. Punishment here consists of solitary confinement and a very long prison term. Punishment over there is torture.
You can find links to both versions of the entire opinion, or just read the good parts (i.e. what got redacted) at the link below.

We Don't Do Torture

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

$1.2 Billion missing in Dyncorp contract in Iraq. So guess what company is slated to replace Blackwater?
posted by Wally
6:32 AM

At least they weren't going around shooting people

Condi and George have more in common every time you look at them. This time we find yet another example of complete lack of oversight by the State Department over a private contractor in Iraq. Dyncorp is $1.2 Billion dollars richer, and nobody knows where the money went.
Just as the State Department is trying to work its way clear of its Blackwater troubles, a scathing federal audit released Tuesday exposes a glaring lapse in oversight of another federal contractor in Iraq, DynCorp. DynCorp was supposed to train and equip Iraqi police, but the report says the State Department doesn't know how most of the money in the billion-plus-dollar program was spent.

The State Department "does not know specifically what it received for most of the $1.2 billion in expenditures under its DynCorp contract for the Iraqi Police Training Program," the audit says. The federal watchdogs, with the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, or SIGIR, said that they even had to suspend their audit because there wasn't enough data to check the books, which were in "disarray."
Read that again. The books are so screwed up they stopped the audit. That's not to say they cancelled the contract, of course. They just threw up their hands and said "screw it, we have no idea where the money went" and stopped looking.
But with invoices paid without being checked, and with no one tracking what they were for, auditors say it's impossible to determine what money was spent on. The State Department admits that it was unable to reconcile the books for the entire period of February 2004 to October 2006 but says since then it has made tremendous improvements. A spokesperson disputes that "most" of the $1.2 billion was not accounted for and suggests it should be "some" rather than "most." The spokesperson said that "INL is committed to considerable improvement. We've already made considerable staffing and process changes to improve our contract oversight."
Well la-dee-frikking-da, they "already" made staffing and process changes. "Already"?! It's been 4 frikking years. What the hell do they mean "already"? But at least it's nice to hear that, according to Condi's ever so trustworthy and honest State Department, it's only "some" and not "most" of the money that went missing. Based on the use of the English language they've "already" demonstrated, I wonder what they mean by "some" and not "most".

And how the hell does an entire 2 1/2 years of payments go missing, with no way to reconcile where the money went? Try that with your taxes for the next couple years and see how understanding the IRS is about it.

If the Bush administration's response to Dyncorp is any indication, they'll end up giving you even more money. Yes, Dyncorp is slated to replace Blackwater when they pull are kicked out of Iraq.

When the Republicans start whining about taxes like they love to do, the State Department and Bush's private war profiteers might be a nice place to start. Before they start crying about "welfare moms" and having to pay for health care for kids that are slightly above dirt poor, all I can say is, I want my $1.2 Billion back, bitches.

How Bush Spends Your Tax Dollars

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, October 22, 2007
No wonder the Bush administration likes wiretapping so much
posted by Wally
2:42 PM

It's not just illegal and unconstitutional, it's also good for business - $1000 a pop
Although the scope of surveillance conducted under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act remains shrouded in secrecy, newly disclosed documents show the costs one company charges the government to eavesdrop on customers.

Comcast, which is among the nation's largest telecommunication companies, charges $1,000 to install a FISA wiretap and $750 for each additional month authorities want to keep an eye on suspects, according to the company's Handbook for Law Enforcement. Secrecy News obtained the document and published it Monday.

"I was actually surprised that this was such a routine transaction that it would have a set fee," said Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists' Project on Government Secrecy.
Your tax dollars at work

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bin Laden releases new hit single "The Surge Is Working"
posted by Wally
1:50 PM

It's working alright, but it's not working how you think. Likewise, Bush actually turned out to be "a uniter, not a divider" - but not how he meant it when he said it.

Bush succeeded as a "uniter" when he united the entire Muslim world (and most of the rest of the world) against him and against the United States, and when he united 76% of the nation against him and the Republican party.

Similarly, "the surge is working" to help al Qaeda recruiters continue grow and expand their numbers and the popularity of their organization in the Muslim world. The surge is working to legitimize what used to be a radical fringe group and bring it into acceptance in the mainstream Muslim world.
Osama bin Laden called on insurgent groups in Iraq to unify their ranks, in an audio recording aired by Al Jazeera television on Monday.


"The interest of the Islamic nation surpasses that of a group ... the interest of the (Islamic) nation is more important than that of a state," said the speaker who sounded like the leader of al Qaeda.

"The strength of faith is in the strength of the bond between Muslims and not that of a tribe, nationalism or an organization."

The speaker also warned against attempts by the enemy to drive a wedge between different groups by planting agents in them.
Six years and 600 Billion dollars later, with 180,000 troops running around the Middle East, and the world's tallest Arab is wandering around free, dragging a dialysis machine, putting out hit after hit, and taunting us and our inability to find him.

You think maybe we're looking in the wrong place for this guy?. Remember, this is the guy who's actually responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Meanwhile, we continue to destroy the lives, homes, businesses, and families of millions of Iraqis who did nothing to us and meant us no harm. The results of this is that now they DO mean us harm - in numbers beyond Osama's wildest dreams. You see? The surge is working. Just not how you think.

Osama bin who?

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

But caring for poor sick kids is "too expensive"
posted by Wally
12:53 PM

Earlier this month, Bush vetoed the SCHIP bill that would have provided insurance for an additional 4 million uninsured low and middle income children. He waved his new-found veto pen proudly, as if to show off that he does know how to print his name, and said he was vetoeing the bill because the $35 billion price tag spread over 5 years was too expensive. $7 billion a year is too much to spend to keep 4 million kids healthy.

What could be more important to Bush than taking care of our own children? How many guesses do you really need?

Bush Wants $46 Billion More for Wars

President Bush will ask Congress for another $46 billion to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and finance other national security needs.

The figure, which Bush was expected to announce later Monday at the White House, brings to $196.4 billion the total requested by the administration for operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere for the budget year that started Oct. 1. It includes $189.3 billion for the Defense Department, $6.9 billion for the State Department and $200 million for other agencies.

The Iraq war, now in its fifth year, already has cost more than $455 billion, with stepped-up military operations running about $12 billion a month. The war has claimed the lives of more than 3,830 members of the U.S. military and more than 73,000 Iraqi civilians.

The White House originally asked for $141.7 billion for the Pentagon to prosecute the Iraq and Afghanistan missions. The latest request includes $42.3 billion more for the Pentagon.

What Bush is saying in essence is that it is more important to spend nearly $200 Billion of our tax dollars to blow up other people's kids than to spend $7 billion to take care of our own.

That's all you need to know about what Bush means when he uses phrases like "compassionate conservatism" and "culture of life".

Republican Priorities

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Betrayal of the highest order. Bush, Plame, and national security.
posted by Wally
7:39 AM

After revealing Valerie Plame's name and blasting the cover off of the covert CIA operation charged with preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons, the Bush administration further left her out to dry by refusing to provide protection from assassination threats.
Valerie's problem is her decency and humanity. She has reasons most Americans don't know to be really angry with George Bush and George Tenet but she has contained her rage. In a new tasty nugget in her book, Fair Game, she gives some details on the 2004 Al Qaeda threat to kill her. The response of the Administration, or more accurately, the lack of any response, is enough to make the Pope curse. What the Bush Administration failed to do and what George Tenet, CIA Director, failed to do, goes beyond cowardice.

What am I talking about? In 2004 the FBI received intelligence that Al Qaeda hit teams were enroute to the United States to kill Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, and Valerie Plame. The FBI informed Valerie of this threat. This was just more "good" news piled on the fact that her intelligence career was in shambles, that intelligence assets she had recruited/managed were destroyed, and that she was unable to rebut publicly false and malicious smears of her character and reputation by a bunch of partisan Republican hacks. As the mother of two pre-school children, her first thoughts were about protecting her kids. She took the threat seriously and asked for help.

When the White House learned of these threats they sprung into action. They beefed up Secret Service protection for Vice President Cheney and provided security protection to Karl Rove. But they declined to do anything for Valerie. That was a CIA problem.

Valerie contacted the office of Security at CIA and requested assistance. They told her too f*cking bad and to go pound sand. They did not use those exact words, but they told her she was on her own.
They wanted her dead. They wanted to make an example of her to get back at her husband, Joe Wilson, and national security be damned. Whenever you hear Bush and the neo-cons talk about the threats of Iran getting nukes, remember (and remind them) that by outing Plame, they intentionally broke up the operation that was working to prevent that from happening.

They betrayed her, and they betrayed the nation. Can we please put impeachment back on the table? How about imprisonment?

Treason

Here's part of her interview with Katie Couric for "60 Minutes"


Here's the full 60 Minutes interview (in two parts).




Couric: When all is said and done, the top aides to both the president and the vice president leaked your name to reporters. Do you think President Bush was in on this?

Plame: I don't know about that, but I like most other Americans saw President Bush say on TV that he would fire anyone from his administration found to be involved in the leak of my name. It turns out the President is not a man of his word.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:11 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of dubya and this wise bird


Permalink :: 7 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, October 21, 2007
Mercenaries can be like that sometimes
posted by Clyde
6:33 AM

State Department Struggles To Oversee Private Army

Last Christmas Day in Baghdad, U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad received a furious phone call from Iraqi Vice President Adel Abdul Mahdi. An American -- drunk, armed, wandering through the Green Zone after a party -- had shot and killed one of his personal bodyguards the night before, Mahdi said. He wanted to see Khalilzad right away.

At the vice president's home, Khalilzad found the slain guard's family assembled. Mahdi demanded the names of the American and his employer. And he wanted the man turned over to the Iraqi government.

After consulting with the embassy's legal officer, Khalilzad identified the shooter as Andrew J. Moonen, an employee of Blackwater USA, the company that provides security for U.S. diplomats in Baghdad. But he would not deliver Moonen himself. Within 36 hours of the shooting, Blackwater and the embassy had shipped him out of the country.

"As you can imagine," the embassy's Diplomatic Security office said in an e-mail to its Washington headquarters the day of Moonen's departure, "this has serious implications."

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Shotgun diplomacy and one basket with all the eggs will get us killed
posted by Clyde
6:17 AM

In Pakistan Quandary, U.S. Reviews Stance

The scenes of carnage in Pakistan this week conjured what one senior administration official on Friday called "the nightmare scenario" for President Bush's last 15 months in office: Political meltdown in the one country where Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and nuclear weapons are all in play.

White House officials insisted in interviews that they had confidence that their longtime ally, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan's president, would maintain enough influence to keep the country stable as he edged toward a power-sharing agreement with his main rival, Benazir Bhutto.

But other current and former officials cautioned that six years after the United States forced General Musharraf to choose sides in the days after the Sept. 11 attacks, American leverage over Pakistan is now limited. And General Musharraf is weakened.

His effort at conciliation in Pakistan's tribal areas, where Al Qaeda and the Taliban plot and train, proved a failure. His efforts to take them on militarily have so far proved ineffective and politically costly. Almost every major terror attack since 9/11 has been traced back to Pakistani territory, leading many who work in intelligence to believe that Pakistan, not Iraq, is the place Mr. Bush should consider the "central front" in the battle against terrorism. It was also the source of the greatest leakage of nuclear arms technology in modern times.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, October 20, 2007
Insane? Or just stupid? We can attack Iran, says US commander
posted by Wally
10:34 AM

America's top military officer said the country does have the resources to attack Iran, despite the strain of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Adm Michael Mullen, who took over as chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff three weeks ago, said diplomacy remained the priority in dealing with Iran's suspected plans to develop a nuclear weapon and its support for anti-US insurgents in Iraq.

But at a press conference he said: "there is more than enough reserve to respond (militarily) if that, in fact, is what the national leadership wanted to do".

Adm Mullen did not elaborate on what size of assault would be feasible, but earlier reports have said the Pentagon had laid out contingency plans for a major aerial campaign against suspected nuclear targets in Iran.
How about both, insane AND stupid.

War starts with dubya

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Pillage and Plunder - When do we hear about the Rape?
posted by Clyde
4:27 AM

Blackwater tried to take aircraft out of Iraq

Blackwater USA tried to take at least two Iraqi military aircraft out of Iraq two years ago and refused to give the planes back when Iraqi officials sought to reclaim them, according to a congressional committee investigating the private security contractor.

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, wants the company to provide all documents related to the attempted shipment and to explain where the aircraft are now.

In a letter sent Friday to Erik Prince, Blackwater's top executive, Waxman said he learned of the 2005 attempt from a military official who contacted the committee. That official is not identified in the letter, nor is the type of aircraft.

Waxman also is seeking a sweeping amount of information about Blackwater's business, including its contracts with the federal government, profits made since the company was founded a decade ago, Prince's personal earnings since 2001 and details about the payments to the families of Iraqis killed by Blackwater personnel.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Over Deployed - Over Stretched and Over Stressed
posted by Clyde
4:06 AM

Veteran stress cases up sharply

The number of Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans seeking treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder from the Department of Veterans Affairs jumped by nearly 20,000 - almost 70% - in the 12 months ending June 30, VA records show.

More than 100,000 combat veterans sought help for mental illness since the start of the war in Afghanistan in 2001, about one in seven of those who have left active duty since then, according to VA records collected through June. Almost half of those were PTSD cases.

The numbers do not include thousands treated at storefront Vet Centers operated by the department across the country. Nor do they include active-duty personnel diagnosed with the disorder or former servicemembers who have not sought VA treatment.

About 1.5 million U.S. troops have served in Iraq or Afghanistan. Of those, 750,000 have left the military and are eligible for VA health care.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, October 19, 2007
Iraq to Cheney: "GTF Out of Our Country"
posted by Wally
2:26 PM

The message was "delivered directly to Vice President Dick Cheney at the White House" by Iraqi National Security Adviser Mowaffak Al-Rubaie:
"The people of Iraq, the Parliament, the Council of Representatives, and the government of Iraq, they all say no, big fat no, N - O for the bases in Iraq. No military bases for Iraq because we believe that is in direct encroachment to our sovereignty, and we don't need it."



They've told us in writing. Now they've told us in person. They don't want us there. Can our troops take their toys and come home now?

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Another repuke down..
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:13 PM

Martinez quits as RNC chairman

Mel Martinez, the public face of the Republican National Committee as its general chairman, announced Friday he was stepping down from his post after serving only 10 months.

"I believe that our future as a party and nation is bright and I have every intention of continuing to fight for our president, our party, and our candidates," the Florida senator said in a statement.

He said he was relinquishing the post to spend more time focusing on his constituents, and because the RNC reached the objective it set out to when he assumed the role last fall.

"It was my goal as general chairman to lead the party as it established the structure and raised the resources necessary to support our presidential candidate and ensure Republican victories next November. I believe we have accomplished those goals," Martinez said.

Darn

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Gonzo's replacement: Bush is above the law, and waterboarding's cool.
posted by Wally
8:11 AM

He may not have used those exact words, but in Thursday's Senate confirmation hearing, Michael Mukasey (Bush's nominee for Attorney General), made that point clear enough.
On the second day of confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Mr. Mukasey went further than he had the day before in arguing that the White House had constitutional authority to act beyond the limits of laws enacted by Congress, especially when it came to national defense.

He suggested that both the administration's program of eavesdropping without warrants and its use of "enhanced" interrogation techniques for terrorism suspects, including waterboarding, might be acceptable under the Constitution even if they went beyond what the law technically allowed. Mr. Mukasey said the president's authority as commander in chief might allow him to supersede laws written by Congress.
According to Mukasey's non-answers, the President isn't required to obey either U.S. law or international law (i.e. Geneva Convention). The law simply does not apply to him.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't (or wasn't) the United States a "nation of laws"? Didn't we break away from the King specifically because we didn't want any "man" to be above the law? If the law no longer applies to Bush, doesn't that make him, by definition, no longer President, but Dictator? Doesn't that go directly against the Constitution as laid out by the Founding Fathers?

When the man hand chosen by the President to uphold and enforce the law flatly states that he will not enforce those laws against the President who chose him, isn't he clearly stating that he will not do the job he is being hired to do? This is his version of a "job interview", and in it he is clearly stating that he will be insubordinate to his oath of office and that he will refuse to carry out the duties central to his job. Try that next time you're interviewing for a job and let me know how that works out for you. Can it be any more clear that this man is not qualified for the position?

Unfortunately, the H.R. team that is the Senate is incompetent when it comes to vetting qualified applicants. In spite of Mukasey's forthright admission of his intent to not do his job, he'll be approved, and we'll end up with another Gonzo - only smarter - which only makes him more dangerous to the country, and makes Congress even more impotent and irrelevant.

Hail King George

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

BetrayUs
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:52 AM

So much for the surge.

Report says buildup in Iraq gained little
U.S. military, civilian officials warn progress will require years of work
By David Wood
October 19, 2007

WASHINGTON - Despite hopes that the U.S. military "surge" in Iraq would encourage economic and political headway and sap the strength of the insurgency, very little lasting progress has been achieved, according to a new U.S. report.

The study, based on the assessments of dozens of U.S. military and civilian officials working at local levels across Iraq, runs counter to the optimistic forecasts by the top U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus, and Ambassador Ryan Crocker. It said that with the exception of Anbar province, there has been "little progress" toward political reconciliation, a key U.S. goal in Iraq.

Withdrawal of U.S. troops would produce "open battlegrounds of ethnic cleansing" in some Baghdad neighborhoods and elsewhere in Iraq, the report said.

In high-profile congressional hearings last month, Petraeus and Crocker testified that the addition of 28,000 American troops in Iraq, ordered last winter by President Bush, was reducing violence and providing opportunity for economic projects, government reform and political reconciliation.

Quagmire

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:27 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya and the Dalai Lama

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, October 18, 2007
Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA) = The man
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
3:28 PM

And of course the Repukes are upset. They should be upset at themselves instead:

Republicans Object To Stark Comments On War

House Republicans objected today to comments made by outspoken liberal Democratic Rep. Pete Stark of California on the Iraq war during debate on the override of President Bush's veto of the children's health program.

Speaking on the House floor, Stark said, "Under the Republican plan, by 2017, we probably will have killed 20,000 soldiers in Iraq, spending $200 billion."

Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) rose to protest the remark and asked that Stark's words be taken down, a formal procedure to punish a member of Congress for breaching the House's standards of decorum.

The chair later ruled that Stark's comment did not refer to any specific House member and thus were appropriate.

Earlier in the SCHIP debate, Stark had made other spirited remarks.

"You don't have money to fund the war or children,'' he said. "But you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement."

Responding promptly and harshly to Stark, the National Republican Congressional Committee declared he had "trampled on the sacrifice of our troops."

Slam!

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

S-CHIP
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:26 PM

House Fails to Override Child Health Bill Veto

Supporters of a bill to provide health insurance for 10 million children failed this afternoon, as expected, to muster enough support in the House to override President Bush's veto.

The vote to override the veto was 273 to 156, or 13 votes short of the necessary two-thirds majority of those present and voting; the bill was originally approved by a 265 to 159 vote on Sept. 25.
in other news...

Republicans hate your kids

81 Percent Support Expanding S-CHIP, but not House Republicans.

More generally, the poll finds that only about one in five Americans (22 percent) approve of the president's handling of health care. That's lower even than his approval rating on Iraq (26 percent).


UPDATE: Only 2 Democrats voted against the bill. Write or call them and let them know how you feel about their vote.

  • Jim Marshall 8th District in GA
    504 Cannon House Office Building
    Washington, DC 20515
    Phone: 202/225-6531
    Fax: 202/225-3013

  • Gene Taylor 4th District in MS
    2269 Rayburn House Office Building
    Washington, DC 20515-2405
    phone: 202 225-5772
    fax: 202 225-7074

Or go here to email either or both of them.

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

"Stay the course"
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:52 PM

Into the meat grinder they go...

Army to Keep Extending Troops' Service

The U.S. Army will continue to rely on an unpopular program that forces some soldiers to stay on beyond their retirement or re-enlistment dates, despite repeated pressure from Defense Secretary Robert Gates to reduce and eventually eliminate the practice.

Lt. Gen. Michael Rochelle, deputy chief of staff for personnel, said Thursday that the number of soldiers kept on duty has actually increased in recent months as a result of President Bush's orders to increase troop levels in Iraq this year to help quell the violence.

The number of those being kept on beyond their commitment - through a program known as "stop loss" - is about 9,000 now, compared to about 7,000 before the troop buildup began in late January, he said.

"Until there is some reduction in the demand, we're going to have to rely, unfortunately ... on stop loss," Rochelle told reporters. "Until the demand comes down a bit, we can't do it without it."

Drafty

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Larry Craig isn't gay, but his pants are flaming
posted by Wally
11:51 AM

Larry Craig continues to insist that he is not in any way gay or bisexual or that he in any way approves of any of that kind of sick vile evil perverted disgusting hot man-on-man action. Nope, apparently he's just a misunderstood conservative christian married straight guy. One who just happens to enjoy playing with other men's peeners. But he's not gay or bi!

He also said that he didn't consult with an attorney before issuing a guilty plea in the Minneapolis Airport bathroom gay toe-tapping scandal, and that he made the decision to plead guilty spontaneously while under extreme duress (one might think they were waterboarding him, or holding him in a "stress position" - perhaps something akin to leaning under an airport men's room stall to play with another man's peener). His ideas of spontaneousness, extreme duress, and not consulting an attorney are apparently quite different than most people's, since after his arrest, he went home and thought about it for a few weeks and talked to his lawyer before driving himself back to the courthouse to file his guilty plea.

Then he swore that he would resign if he couldn't rescind his guilty plea. He couldn't, and he didn't.

Tuesday, in a move certain to further enhance his infallible credibility, he gave an interview to NBC's Matt Lauer on Tuesday night, and said "Matt, you won't believe this. But I don't use the Internet. I don't have a computer at my desk. I've never used the Internet."

Oh really Larry? Never huh? Then what about all this?
  • In an op-ed he wrote this summer on the SCHIP health care program, Craig refers to doing a Google search on the term "mission creep."
  • He's a member of the Congressional Internet Caucus.
  • He co-sponsored a bill designating June 2007 as National Internet Safety Month.
  • He was presented with the 2007 Internet Keep Safe Coalition Award.
  • On his Web site, he lists as a top accomplishment a Silver Mouse Award given to his site by the Congressional Management Foundation in 2003 and 2006.
  • When he endorsed Mitt Romney for president, he did so on YouTube.
Is there anything this man won't lie about? Oh yeah, he's a Republican. That explains it.

Pants on Fire

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Who's idea was this?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
9:26 AM

There's something about the Rockettes kicking their legs for the legless troops at Walter Reed that just seems awkward. No?

Rockette's Radio City Spectacular Returns for Holidays

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Good riddance
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
9:03 AM

Sources: Brownback to drop White House bid

Republican Sam Brownback will drop out of the 2008 presidential campaign on Friday, people close to the Kansas senator said Thursday.

Brownback, a longshot conservative contender, had trouble raising money to compete in the race. He is expected announce his withdrawal in Topeka, Kan.

He raised a little more than $800,000 in the third quarter of this year, his lowest quarterly amount since entering race. He has brought in more than $4 million overall and is eligible for $2 million in federal matching funds.

.....

Brownback, who is in his second term, had said in his first Senate campaign he would serve no more than two terms in Senate. He is widely expected to seek the Kansas governor's office in 2010.

Wingnut

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Nice comeback!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:59 AM

I'm only posting this because of Obama's comeback (in bold). Pretty classic:

Obama and Cheney, Making Connections

At least that was the stunning announcement made yesterday by Lynne Cheney, who said that the very white vice president from Wyoming is in fact the eighth cousin of Obama, the Senate's only African American member. She said she discovered the link, traced back to a Huguenot who figured prominently in Maryland history, while researching her latest book.

"This is such an amazing story," Cheney said in an interview on MSNBC, "that one ancestor, a man that came to Maryland, could be responsible down the family line for lives that have taken such different and varied paths as Dick's and Barack Obama's." Cristina Allegretti, Lynne Cheney's research and project manager at the American Enterprise Institute, said the vice president's wife did an exhaustive genealogical search of her family while working on "Blue Skies, No Fences." Her research led her to an early Cheney settler named Richard Cheney, whose granddaughter married Samuel Duvall, whose mother, Mareen Duvall, is distantly related to Obama. Lynne Cheney read a story that said Obama wa s related to Mareen Duvall, and realized the link.

Obama, whose mother was white, did not immediately comment on the revelation. But his campaign made light of the tie, without confirming it. "Obviously, Dick Cheney is the black sheep of the family," Obama spokesman Bill Burton said.

Darth

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Rat. Ship. You know the story.
posted by Wally
6:54 AM

Maybe former House Speaker Denny Hastert (R-Ill) has finally realized how impotent he has become. Or maybe there's something going on that we don't know about, and that he doesn't want us to know about. Whatever the reason, he's resigning his seat in the House. Perhaps tellingly, and suspiciously, he's decided that he is not even going to finish out his term.
The Roll Call newspaper in Washington reported on its website last night that former House Speaker Dennis Hastert of Illinois intends to resign his House seat later this year.

The subscription-only site said Hastert, who had already announced he would not seek reelection in 2008, was calling friends and associates and telling them of his decision. His early departure would create the need for a special election in his exurban Chicago district, possibly on Illinois' Feb. 5 presidential primary day.
I wonder if his connections to Jack Abramoff played any role in this decision? Or maybe the fact that his long time roommate in D.C., Scott Palmer is an old pal of Mark Foley has something to do with it. Not that I'm insinuating anything - after all, it's unlikely that Denny could even fit in a closet. A bathroom stall on the other hand....

And Stay Out!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, October 17, 2007
"24" -- No, not that 24.
posted by Wally
10:06 AM

How low can Bush go? Apparently even some of the "29%ers" have been struck by reality, and have given up on him, dropping his approval rating to somewhere between O.J. Simpson and jock itch.
Deepening unhappiness with President George W. Bush and the U.S. Congress soured the mood of Americans and sent Bush's approval rating to another record low this month, according to a Reuters/Zogby poll released on Wednesday.

Bush's job approval rating fell to 24 percent from last month's record low for a Zogby poll of 29 percent.
With those kind of numbers, he has beaten everyone except Nixon during Watergate (tied) and Truman (22%). And he still has 17 months left in his Presidency - plenty of time to strive for that record!

Of course, Congress has nothing to celebrate either, having only pulled an 11% rating. Maybe they should try something different, like standing up to the worst president in U.S. history. What's the worst that could happen? It's not like they could be any more unpopular.

Two Dozen

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Gore out. Colbert in.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:57 AM

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Dammit Al.....
posted by Wally
6:30 AM

Not that we won't support whichever of the others wins the primary, but it would have been nice to see him hop into the race and stir things up in the race. If nothing else, his presence would have invigorated the primary race and pushed environmental issues, not to mention the concept of "peace" into the debate, both of which have been conspicuously absent. He would have but a bit of excitement into politics again - especially among younger people. But, it's not to be.
Gore: no plans to run for presidency

Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore has ruled out joining the U.S. presidential race after winning the Nobel Peace Prize for his work fighting climate change.

"I don't have plans to be a candidate again so I don't really see it in that context at all," Gore said when asked in an interview with Norway's NRK public television aired on Wednesday about how the award would affect his political future.

"I'm involved in a different kind of campaign, it's a global campaign," Gore said. "It's a campaign to change the way people think about the climate crisis."
After losing the vote 5-4 in 2000, and putting up with all the b.s. before and after, I can hardly blame him. He's having fun now, following his passion, making a difference. But oh what a difference he could have made from the White House, with a friendly house and senate.

How inconvenient

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:24 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption


(click image for bigger pic and article)

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Bush 2.0: Judy Riuliani
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:19 PM

Giuliani sends sharp warning on Iran

"Republican Rudolph Giuliani on Tuesday bluntly guaranteed that if he is the next US president, Iran will not get nuclear weapons, even if it takes a military strike to stop it.

The former New York mayor's hawkish warning came as the 2008 election campaign raced towards first party nominating contests in less than three months, and the US nuclear showdown with Iran emerged as a premier foreign policy issue.

"We have seen what Iran will do with ordinary weapons," Giuliani told a forum of presidential candidates organized by the Republican Jewish Coalition.

"If I am President of the United States, I guarantee you, we will never find out what they will do if they get nuclear weapons, because they are not going to get a nuclear weapon."

9/11

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Private Health Insurance Company Profits Trump Poor Kids' Healthcare Needs
posted by Wally
8:37 AM

That $25 Billion for the SCHIP children's health insurance program that Bush vetoed as being too expensive? Henry Waxman just found a nice chunk of the money to pay for it. Not suprisingly, it's in the private health insurance sector.
Report criticizes Medicare drug plan costs

U.S. taxpayers and Medicare patients could have saved almost $15 billion in 2007 if private health insurers had cut expenses for prescription drug coverage and negotiated bigger discounts, a report from Democratic staff of a House of Representatives panel said on Monday.

(snip)

The companies failed to negotiate significant rebates from drug makers, the report also said. Insurers did get discounts in the form of rebates that reduced spending by 8.1 percent in 2007. But that was less than the 26 percent the Medicaid program secured from drug manufacturers. Medicaid is a state and federal insurance program for the poor.

When a Republican-led Congress created the Medicare drug coverage in 2003, supporters said using private insurers would promote competition and cost savings. The benefits took effect in 2006.

"Privatizing the delivery of the drug benefit has enriched the drug companies and insurance industry at the expense of seniors and taxpayers," Waxman said in a statement on Monday. He released the report with 12 Democrats on his committee.
Oh Mr. Waxman, you should know by now the Bush White House doesn't care about seniors or taxpayers, just like they don't care about the health of poor children. They have different priorities.

Profit and greed

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Romney's "Republican Stool"
posted by Wally
7:36 AM

Mitt Romney is not so good with words, is he?

First it was this ad, with that awkward line about terrorists wanting to "collapse freedom-loving nations like us."

Now it's this press release.
STRATEGY FOR A STRONGER AMERICA:
THE THREE-LEGGED REPUBLICAN STOOL

"I believe that to win the White House that our candidate has to be somebody who can represent and speak for all three legs of the conservative stool or conservative coalition that Ronald Reagan put together - social conservatives, economic conservatives and defense conservatives." - Governor Romney (Governor Mitt Romney, Press Availability, Grand Rapids, MI, 10/13/07)
Maybe it's just me, but a three-legged stool is one of the least inspiring political metaphors I've ever heard. "A Bridge to the 21st Century," I can understand; a bridge implies progress, movement, connection. A stool just implies sitting down.

Also, it's probably not too smart to put the words "Republican" and "stool" right next to each other like that. Some snarky headline writer could, you know, take it out of context.
Maybe he's thinking of ways to triple the seating capacity at the Republican Convention.

Flip the stool over

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

"America, it has been five years. It's time to make a choice."
posted by Wally
6:30 AM

12 former Army captains: The Real Iraq We Knew
Today marks five years since the authorization of military force in Iraq, setting Operation Iraqi Freedom in motion. Five years on, the Iraq war is as undermanned and under-resourced as it was from the start. And, five years on, Iraq is in shambles.

As Army captains who served in Baghdad and beyond, we've seen the corruption and the sectarian division. We understand what it's like to be stretched too thin. And we know when it's time to get out.

(snip)

This is Operation Iraqi Freedom and the reality we experienced. This is what we tried to communicate up the chain of command. This is either what did not get passed on to our civilian leadership or what our civilian leaders chose to ignore. While our generals pursue a strategy dependent on peace breaking out, the Iraqis prepare for their war -- and our servicemen and women, and their families, continue to suffer.

There is one way we might be able to succeed in Iraq. To continue an operation of this intensity and duration, we would have to abandon our volunteer military for compulsory service. Short of that, our best option is to leave Iraq immediately. A scaled withdrawal will not prevent a civil war, and it will spend more blood and treasure on a losing proposition.
How many more of these "phony soldiers" will the great war hero Rush Limbaugh have to chastise before they stop speaking out and telling the truth about what they experienced? How many more men, as that draft-dodging pussy John Kerry said, will have "to die for a mistake?" One more is too many.

Bring them home

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, October 15, 2007
Still Hope!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:15 PM

Run Al, run!

Gore uploads three campaign-style videos on Current.com

This will be a short, hit-and-run diary. People need to go to Current.com and view the three short videos Gore uploaded last night, one entitled Healthcare is a right, one called Americans deserve more protection and the third entitled Get the troops home. All Gorites and those with an open-mind, head over to Current.com and view the clips! Then sign up to the site so you can discuss them.

Current.com

Permalink :: 6 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Mission Accomplished Again!
posted by Wally
8:24 AM

The Surge Worked! U.S. Military Reports That Al-Qaeda In Iraq Has Been Crippled

The U.S. military believes it has dealt devastating and perhaps irreversible blows to al-Qaeda in Iraq in recent months, leading some generals to advocate a declaration of victory over the group, which the Bush administration has long described as the most lethal U.S. adversary in Iraq.


Hooray! We won! That means we can bring the troops home, right? Right?

"I think it would be premature at this point," a senior intelligence official said of a victory declaration over AQI, as the group is known. Despite recent U.S. gains, he said, AQI retains "the ability for surprise and for catastrophic attacks." Earlier periods of optimism, such as immediately following the June 2006 death of AQI founder Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in a U.S. air raid, not only proved unfounded but were followed by expanded operations by the militant organization.
Oh sure, it's all sunshine and rainbows and bunny rabbits over there, until the talk turns to bringing the troops home and ending the occupation. Then it's back to "stay the course."
Recent suicide bombings in northern Iraq have convinced some officials that AQI has moved its operations in that direction. But the officials said they do not know whether AQI militants have permanently decamped from Baghdad and Anbar province, or whether they are merely lying low in anticipation of a U.S. departure or the failure of Shiite Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to end the sectarian divisions that AQI fostered and now feeds upon.
Translation: it's not so much "declaration of victory" as "declaration of sort of winning this round of whack-a-mole". So what do we win, a stuffed teddy bear?
While a victory declaration might have the "psychological aspect" of discouraging recruitment to a perceived lost cause, the White House official said, advantages overall would be minimal. "I recognize that there are pros to saying, 'Hey, listen, the bad guys are on the run.' " But if AQI were later able to demonstrate residual capabilities with a series of bombings, "even though it was temporary," he said, "the question becomes: How does this play out in terms of public opinion?"
That's what it always comes down to with the Bush administration - public opinion. They're hoping that by blowing more smoke up our asses and telling us we're winning in Iraq it will give us a warm fuzzy feeling. Sort of like winning a stuffed teddy bear.

Just don't ask what it's stuffed with.

Victory!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Buh-Bye Republican Party!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:39 AM

They hate the poor, the blacks, the arabs, the mexicans, the atheists, the french, the 9/11 heroes, and now children who need health insurance. No wonder why their party is dying:

Younger voters giving GOP the cold shoulder
Frustration with war, strong views on social issues initiate new trend

Conrad Camit of Houston is the son of committed Republican immigrants from the Philippines. A former political independent, the Texas A&M University graduate, 33, said the war sealed his conversion to the Democratic Party.

Also, he said, "growing up in an immigrant family, you tend to be supportive of a pro-immigrant stance, which is definitely a Democratic ideal," said Camit, now communications vice president of the Harris County Young Democrats.

These Lone Star State voters reflect a national trend: Exit polls from recent elections and survey research show the nation's young people are less likely to embrace the Republican Party than any generation since the '60s.

The reasons for the GOP's woes among under-30 Americans include frustration with the long-running Iraq war, libertarian or liberal views on social issues, which clash with Republican social conservative orthodoxy, and changing demographic trends that have created the most ethnically and racially diverse group of young people in American history.

The numbers are stark: Voters under 30 were the only age group to favor Democrat John Kerry for president in 2004, 54 percent to 45 percent, according to CNN exit polls. The party's support among young voters surged by 7 percentage points from 2000, when Democrat Al Gore led George W. Bush 48-46 among young voters.

Among under-30 adults, Kerry was backed by 88 percent of blacks, 65 percent of Asian-Americans, 58 percent of Latinos and 44 percent of Anglos, according to CIRCLE, the University of Maryland election research center.

.....

Turnout among younger voters is historically much lower than that of older Americans, but it climbed in the past two elections, jumping 9 points in 2004 and between 2 and 4 points in 2006, according to CIRCLE data.

Thank you Karl Rove?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:02 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya at a UN Security Council meeting.

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, October 14, 2007
See Rush, soldiers CAN think for themselves!
posted by Clyde
5:33 AM

At an Army School for Officers, Blunt Talk About Iraq

FORT LEAVENWORTH, Kan. - Here at the intellectual center of the United States Army, two elite officers were deep in debate at lunch on a recent day over who bore more responsibility for mistakes in Iraq - the former defense secretary, Donald H. Rumsfeld, or the generals who acquiesced to him.

"The secretary of defense is an easy target," argued one of the officers, Maj. Kareem P. Montague, 34, a Harvard graduate and a commander in the Third Infantry Division, which was the first to reach Baghdad in the 2003 invasion. "It's easy to pick on the political appointee."

"But he's the one that's responsible," retorted Maj. Michael J. Zinno, 40, a military planner who worked at the headquarters of the Coalition Provisional Authority, the former American civilian administration in Iraq.

No, Major Montague shot back, it was more complicated: the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the top commanders were part of the decision to send in a small invasion force and not enough troops for the occupation. Only Gen. Eric K. Shinseki, the Army chief of staff who was sidelined after he told Congress that it would take several hundred thousand troops in Iraq, spoke up in public.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Quick, someone tell Malkin
posted by Clyde
5:07 AM

Families held hostage by health-care costs

Single parent Donna Johnson, an office manager for a private school near Baltimore, lives on $42,000 a year and counts herself lucky that she doesn't have to work two jobs to afford health insurance for her children.

The reason, she says, is that for $57 a month, Maryland allows her to enroll her son Evens Cross, 12, and daughter Josie Cross, 9, in the state's version of the State Children's Health Insurance Program, or SCHIP, which accepts families earning as much as three times the poverty level: $51,510 for a family of three.

That's a lot cheaper than adding the kids to her individual HMO policy, which she said would jack up her monthly $200 premium to $500 or more.

"It helps out abundantly," said Johnson, who owns a town house. "It covers their eye exams, it covers their annual physicals, and if they get sick, it covers that. Their doctor knows them. If there is a problem, the doctor will take my call. ... You sleep better, because anything can happen. And if you don't have insurance coverage, who are you going to turn to?"

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, October 13, 2007
The Army of 1608945
posted by Clyde
4:51 AM

Felons helped Army meet recruitment goal

The Army made its recruiting goal last year despite an increasingly unpopular war by turning to people convicted of serious crimes.

Recruiters signed up people who had committed such felonies as arson, burglary, aggravated assault, breaking and entering and driving while intoxicated.

The Army Recruiting Command said "moral" waivers for 1,620 felons were approved in the 2007 federal fiscal year, which ended Sept. 30. That was far above the 2006 mark of 1,002.

The Army called giving waivers "the right thing to do" for those who want to serve. But a former Vietnam-era combat commander warned the service has cut a Faustian bargain it has made in the past and came to regret.

(Link)

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

How long before Rush dubs him a phony soldier?
posted by Clyde
4:38 AM

Ex-general: 'No end in sight' in Iraq

The U.S. mission in Iraq is a "nightmare with no end in sight" because of political misjudgments after the fall of Saddam Hussein that continue today, a former chief of U.S.-led forces said Friday.

Retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, who commanded coalition troops for a year beginning June 2003, cast a wide net of blame for both political and military shortcomings in Iraq that helped open the way for the insurgency - such as disbanding the Saddam-era military and failing to cement ties with tribal leaders and quickly establish civilian government after Saddam was toppled.

He called current strategies - including the deployment of 30,000 additional forces earlier this year - a "desperate attempt" to make up for years of misguided policies in Iraq.

"There is no question that America is living a nightmare with no end in sight," Sanchez told a group of journalists covering military affairs.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, October 12, 2007
"Post 9/11 World" My Ass - Bush was pushing for Dictator long before then
posted by Wally
2:35 PM

NSA Domestic Surveillance Began 7 Months Before 9/11, Convicted Qwest CEO Claims
Did the NSA's massive call records database program pre-date the terrorist attacks of 9/11?

That startling allegation is in court documents released this week which show that former Qwest CEO Joseph Nacchio -- the head of the only company known to have turned down the NSA's requests for Americans' phone records -- tried, unsuccessfully, to argue just that in his defense against insider trading charges.

Nacchio was sentenced to 6 years in prison in 2007 after being found guilty of illegally selling shares based on insider information that the company's fortunes were declining. Nacchio unsuccessfully attempted to defend himself by arguing that he actually expected Qwest's 2001 earnings to be higher because of secret NSA contracts, which, he contends, were denied by the NSA after he declined in a February 27, 2001 meeting to give the NSA customer calling records, court documents released this week show.

AT&T, Verizon and Bellsouth all agreed to turn over call records to an NSA database, according to reporting in the USA Today in 2006. At that time, Nacchio's lawyer publicly stated that Nacchio declined to participate until served with a proper legal order.
When Bush says we need this information to stop terrorists in a post 9/11 world, he's using 3,000 dead bodies as an excuse to further the agenda he's wanted all along. The same dead bodies he used to drag us into an illegal and unnecessary war against the man who "tried to kill his daddy". The same dead bodies he uses for every damn thing. Bush doesn't give a rat's ass about a single one of them, except as convenient excuses to do whatever the hell he wants - as an excuse to do what he couldn't have done if they were still alive.

It's not the "Post 9/11 world" that's the problem, it's the "Post January 20, 2001 world" that's so worrisome.

They convicted the wrong criminal

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

You need a scorecard to keep track of all the retiring Republicans
posted by Wally
2:01 PM

And then there were 11. After 35 years in the House of Representatives, Ohio Republican Rep. Ralph Regula is calling it quits at the end of this term, leaving yet another Republican House seat up for grabs.
He is the 13th House member, and 11th Republican, to announce plans to depart then. Five senators, all Republicans, also are retiring.

Regula, 82, was first elected in 1972. He has served longer than all but one other House Republican — Florida’s C.W. Bill Young, with whom he serves on the powerful Appropriations Committee. Regula, a member of the committee since his second term, currently is the ranking Republican on its Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee.

A highly competitive race is expected in Ohio’s 16th, which includes Canton and usually has a modest Republican lean; President Bush won 54 percent of the district vote in the 2004 election, when he was more popular than he is today.

The presumptive Democratic nominee is state Sen. John Boccieri, an Iraq war veteran.
Remember that name. It's getting harder and harder for the GOP to call themselves the "strong on defense" party - or at least harder for anyone to take them seriously when they call themselves that - with all the Vets running as Democrats.

Who's Next?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Blackwater: Out of control
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
9:54 AM

The Blackwater File
The Confidential Iraqi Incident Report

Oct. 15, 2007 issue - The colonel was furious. "Can you believe it? They actually drew their weapons on U.S. soldiers." He was describing a 2006 car accident, in which an SUV full of Blackwater operatives had crashed into a U.S. Army Humvee on a street in Baghdad's Green Zone. The colonel, who was involved in a follow-up investigation and spoke on the condition he not be named, said the Blackwater guards disarmed the U.S. Army soldiers and made them lie on the ground at gunpoint until they could disentangle the SUV. His account was confirmed by the head of another private security company. Asked to address this and other allegations in this story, Blackwater spokesperson Anne Tyrrell said, "This type of gossip has led to many soap operas in the press."

.....

Responsible for guarding top U.S. officials in Iraq, Blackwater operatives are often accused of playing by their own rules. Unlike nearly everyone else who enters the Green Zone, said an American soldier who guards a gate, Blackwater gunmen refuse to stop and clear their weapons of live ammunition once inside. One military contractor, who spoke anonymously for fear of retribution in his industry, recounted the story of a Blackwater operative who answered a Marine officer's order to put his pistol on safety when entering a base post office by saying, "This is my safety," and wiggling his trigger finger in the air. "Their attitude was, 'We're f---ing security; we don't have to answer to anybody'."

Go to hell Blackwater

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
8:35 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya taking credit for the shrinking(?) budget deficit (which has "shrunk" to only $163 Billion larger than it was last year).

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Gore Wins!
posted by Wally
6:26 AM

Al Gore and U.N. climate panel win Nobel Peace Prize


Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and the U.N. climate panel won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for their part in galvanising international action against global warming before it "moves beyond man's control".



Gore and the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) won "for their efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change", the Norwegian Nobel Committee said.

"He is probably the single individual who has done most to create greater worldwide understanding of the measures that need to be adopted," the committee said of Gore.
In response to Gore's win, the White House said "Of course we're happy for Vice President Gore and the IPCC for receiving this recognition." This is the same White House that has of course been working tirelessly to subvert and undermine his ideas and suggestions - you know, all that "sciencey" stuff.

Now that he's won the Nobel, he has to answer the inconvenient (yet incessant) question - will he run for President? Please?!

That's not an idle question. A whole lot of people are asking, and would really like the answer to be a resounding "yes". On Wednesday, the organization DraftGore.com ran a full page ad in the New York Times. So far they have over 167,000 signatures on their petition / letter to Al (up 30,000 since they ran the ad). Click on the image below to view the ad in .PDF format. Click here to sign the petition.

If only.....

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, October 11, 2007
Ruh Rove... They're talking about Karl in Congressional hearings again.
posted by Wally
7:44 AM

GOP lawyer links him to another case of the White House politically interfering in Dept of Justice investigations

Karl might be gone, but he's not forgotten. Oh the fond memories. What fun it is to sit around with the House Judiciary Committee and listen to the stories of the good times when Rove was still "Bush's Brain", pulling the strings of power to politically assassinate his rivals.
A Republican lawyer claims she was told that Karl Rove - while serving as President Bush's top political advisor - had intervened in the Justice Department's prosecution of Alabama's most prominent Democrat. Longtime Alabama GOP activist Dana Jill Simpson first made the allegation in June, but has now provided new details in a lengthy sworn statement to the House Judiciary Committee. The Committee is expected to hold public hearings on the Alabama case next week as part of its investigation of possible political interference by the Bush Administration in the activities of the Department of Justice.

Simpson said in June that she heard a close associate of Rove say that the White House political adviser "had spoken with the Department of Justice" about "pursuing" Don Siegelman, a former Democratic governor of Alabama, with help from two of Alabama's U.S. attorneys. Siegelman was later indicted on 32 counts of corruption, convicted on seven of them, and is currently serving an 88-month sentence in Federal prison.

If Simpson's version of events is accurate, it would show direct political involvement by the White House in federal prosecutions - a charge leveled by Administration critics in connection with the U.S. attorney scandal that led to the resignation of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. But her account is disputed; those who she alleges told her about Rove's involvement during a G.O.P. campaign conference call claim that no such conversation took place. Rove himself has not responded to Simpson's allegations, which are clearly based on second-hand information, and the White House has refused to comment while Siegelman's case remains on appeal.

Simpson also claims Riley, Jr., named the judge who would eventually be assigned to the case, and says Riley told her the judge would "hang Don Siegelman" because of a grudge against the former governor. She says he also specified one of the exact charges that Siegelman would later face. She says Riley, Jr., told her that Siegelman had conceded the close 2002 governor's race to his father only after being told he would no longer be subject to possible federal corruption charges.


Note that this isn't some partisan political hack - this is a long time GOP activist and lawyer. From the Sworn On-the-Record Interview of Dana Jill Simpson by the House Judiciary Committee Staff:
Ms. Simpson testified that she is a lifelong Republican, who has worked on political campaigns for Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, Judge Roy Moore of Alabama, and Governor Bob Riley of Alabama, among others.
Maybe it's time to bring Karl Rove's happy ass back to D.C. and park it in front of Congress for a little bit of those "enhanced interrogation techniques" that he so strongly espouses. Of course nobody seriously expects anything to come of this, or for Karl to spend a day in prison, if even in court (you know Bush would pardon him - and of course squeal "executive privilege" - in a heartbeat if it ever came to that. Yet, it's still fun to see his name still being bandied about the courtroom and the halls of Congress, and splashed across the headlines again, keeping thoughts of Bush cronyism and Republican corruption fresh in the minds of any voters vaguely paying attention.

As for Dana Jill Simpson, I hope she avoids flying in small planes, and watches her back. It's dangerous to be honest around this administration.

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Good thing Halliburton moved to Dubai
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:42 AM

Democrats Pass Bipartisan Bill To Stop War Profiteering

By a vote of 375-3, the House has passed the War Profiteering Prevention Act, H.R. 400. The bill makes war profiteering a felony. If this legislation becomes law, anyone found guilty of profiting excessively from military action or reconstruction may be subject to 20 years in prison and fines up to $1 millionor as much as twice the illegal profits of their crime.

Last week, the Democratic Congress also passed legislation that would bring all United States government contractors in the Iraq war zone under the jurisdiction of American criminal law. The measure would require the F.B.I. to investigate any allegations of wrongdoing.

Bush WILL veto
Halliburton stock since the beginning of the Iraq occupation:

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, October 10, 2007
A hint of ball sweat.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:39 PM

Democrats defy Bush, approve spy bill

In defiance of U.S. President George W. Bush, Democrats on Wednesday voted to bolster civil-liberty safeguards in his anti-terror spying program and refused to shield phone companies from pending lawsuits.

Just hours after Bush warned Democrats they would be rolling back efforts to protect against another Sept. 11-type attack, the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee approved legislation to ensure congressional and secret-court oversight of the surveillance of enemy targets. The vote was 20-14.

The measure would require the administration to obtain one-year "blanket warrants" from the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to monitor telephone calls or e-mails of suspected terrorists when they involve a U.S. citizen.

It would not require individual warrants to listen in on Americans communicating with terrorists, unless the U.S. citizen is also a specific target of the surveillance. No warrant would be needed to monitor foreign suspects speaking to each other overseas.

"The legislation before us today seeks to once again strike the appropriate balance between needed government authority and our precious rights and liberties," said House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, a Michigan Democrat.

They'll cave

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Smokin' (pole) in the boys room
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:12 AM

Another Republican caught toe tapping in a bathroom...

Joey DiFatta withdraws from Bayou State senate race, caught in gay sex sting

Another elected official was caught toe-tapping in the boys room. The Times-Picayune reports yet another Republican was caught soliciting in a public restroom.

Joey DiFatta is the chairman of St. Bernard Parish Council and a prominent Republican leader (until 2004 on the GOP state party Executive Committee).

He just withdrew from his state senate race, after his arrests for lewd behavior in a public restroom were made public.

.....


The deputy inside the stall, Detective Wayne Couvillion, responded by tapping his foot, and DiFatta reached under the partition and began to rub the deputy's leg, the report states.

The detective asked DiFatta, 'What do you want?' according to the report, and he replied, 'I want to play with you.' "

Playtime!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

I thought Bush said we were winning?
posted by Wally
7:31 AM

"Five years after September the 11th, 2001, America is safer -- and America is winning the war on terror." ~ Dubya September 7, 2006

"Absolutely, we're winning. Al Qaeda is on the run" ~Dubya
October 25, 2006

That was so last year, and boy how times have changed. The White House is singing a different tune in a new report released yesterday.
Al Qaeda remains the "most serious and dangerous" terrorism threat and is expected to increase attempts to place agents inside the United States, a White House report said Tuesday.

The report, titled "National Strategy for Homeland Security," said Al Qaeda had protected its top leadership, replenished operational lieutenants and "regenerated a safe haven" in Pakistan's tribal areas.
Apparently we're not winning. What could have caused the sudden change in rhetoric? It wouldn't be another occurance of Bush using terrorism and fear for purely political purposes, to get his way and quash reasoned debate, would it? What could possibly be the reason for the sudden flip flop?
Some questioned the timing of the dire warnings in the strategy, which has information already available from several sources, including a July national intelligence estimate and a February presidential directive.

It was released just as Democrats began debate on President George W. Bush's push to make permanent a law allowing warrantless eavesdropping on phone calls and e-mails between people in the United States and suspected terrorists abroad.

And it came out the same day as a complaint from a private security firm that an administration leak ruined efforts to monitor al-Qaida activities.
And you thought Rove was gone, didn't you.

On a positive note, at least the White House has finally learned one thing - it's not just terrorists that can raise hell in the "homeland". It only took 2 years after Katrina drowned the Gulf Coast, but in the report, the administration finally admits that maybe "security" includes security from natural disasters. The report doesn't give any real guidelines about how to handle natural disasters, but at least Bush is finally admitting that they happen.
Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, said, however, that the document "provides little guidance for the deficiencies already taxing our homeland security capacity, while at the same time, it attempts to define successes ... which have not yet been realized."

"It reads more like a legacy document than a forward-leaning strategy," said Frank Cilluffo, a former Bush adviser who is now head of George Washington University's Homeland Security Policy Institute. "To some extent, it was a missed opportunity," he said.

David Heyman, director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies homeland security program, noted that the 208,000-worker Department of Homeland Security remains short of key managers and its deputy secretary, Michael Jackson, recently announced his resignation.

"It's a surprising time ... to come up with a new strategy," Heyman said. "My concern is that, even if this is a better or best strategy, without the effective leadership, human resources, processes and operations to support it, they are not going to set down roots."
Is Heyman suggesting that perhaps Brownie wasn't, in fact, "doing a heck of a job"? No medal of freedom for you Mr. Heyman!

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:27 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya with the families of fallen firefighters.


Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, October 9, 2007
Mitt Romney Runs From Wheelchair Questioner
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:21 PM

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Do "the Google" for R-etard
posted by Wally
9:47 AM

With nothing more pressing to worry about, now that they've solved all other problems and cleaned up their party to ensure that no Republican or conservative organizations are doing anything unethical or immoral or worrisome, the right-wing has turned it's attention to.... the Google?

Google Inc. occasionally features light-hearted doodles on its colorful home-page logo to commemorate special occasions. But now they are drawing criticism from conservatives for not being more patriotic.

The Mountain View, Calif., company bathes its logo in stars and stripes every Independence Day, but last week's decision to honor the 50th anniversary of the Sputnik launch -- the second "g" in Google was replaced with a drawing of the Soviet satellite -- is being blasted by some conservatives.



Not only did Google honor an achievement by a totalitarian regime that was our Cold War enemy, they griped, but it did so without having ever altered its logo to commemorate U.S. military personnel on Memorial Day or Veterans Day.

"It's a kick to your belly," said conservative blogger Giovanni Gallucci, 39, a social media consultant from Dallas. "I understand these guys are scientists and engineers and they have their quirks and want to make sure people are recognized who might not normally be recognized . . . but why not celebrate the struggles that we've come through as a people?"
Doing the Google on Mr. Gallucci, all I can say is, wtf does a rich soft well manicured white Microsoft computer geek know about "the struggles we've come through as a people"? I'm willing to bet that this guy doesn't even mow his own lawn. I'm willing to bet even more that few if any of these people stop using the Google to do their porn web surfing.

Hey people, there's a frikking WAR going on. Our troops are being abused abroad, and wounded veterans are being abandoned at home. Hundreds of people are being killed every day in a war that's costing American taxpayers $500,000 a minute. And you're worried about a cartoon commemoration of a great scientific milestone? Oh yeah, it's that "science" stuff. That explains why the right wing is afraid of it.

Republican Priorities

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush's Supreme Court Agrees That Kidnapping and Torture Are Okay
posted by Wally
8:51 AM

Toss out German man's lawsuit claiming abduction and torture by CIA.

Three guesses what was the grounds for dismissing the case.

If you guessed "national security reasons" you were right. Apparently, nobody can hold the government liable for any illegal or unconstitutional actions against them, or any violations of their fundamental rights, because the government can just claim "state secrets" and poof, the case goes away.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday terminated a lawsuit from a man who claims he was abducted and tortured by the CIA, effectively endorsing Bush administration arguments that state secrets would be revealed if the case were allowed to proceed.

Khaled el-Masri, 44, alleged that he was kidnapped by CIA agents in Europe and held in an Afghan prison for four months in a case of mistaken identity.

The administration has not publicly acknowledged that el-Masri was detained, and lower courts dismissed his suit after the administration asserted that state secrets would be revealed if the lawsuit were not blocked. The justices rejected his appeal without comment.
THIS is why the Courts are so important. THIS is why we were so pissed when the Democrats caved to Bush and refused to filibuster these douchebags. This is Bush's new Amerikkka. As long as we all behave ourselves, watch our mouths, and stay inside the marked lines, we'll all enjoy our stay.

Whatever happened to "open government"?

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

1,000-plus war protesters in Berkeley spell out opposition to Bush
posted by Wally
8:23 AM

It all began with a simple conversation around the kitchen table on a Saturday afternoon. Sarah Newsham, 9, asked her dad if he knew about Google Earth. Taking one look at the satellite images, Brad Newsham had an epiphany: The anti-war movement needed visuals.

On Sunday, nearly one year later, Newsham directed more than 1,000 people to lie on the grass at the Berkeley Marina to spell out "IMPEACH!" while photos were taken from helicopters whirring above.

'Nuff said

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush Administration is Still Busy "Outing" Our Spies
posted by Wally
6:25 AM

White House's reckless leaking of Bin Ladin video destroyed a secret link to Al Qaeda's secrets

Once again, the president who keeps bragging about how he's doing such a great job keeping us safe from terr'ists has blown the cover off a secret source of intelligence. Whether through stupidity, or laziness, or carelessness, or arrogance (or all of the above), the Bush administration has "Valerie Plamed" another intelligence source, revealing their identity and their methods, making them essentially useless.
A small private intelligence company that monitors Islamic terrorist groups obtained a new Osama bin Laden video ahead of its official release last month, and around 10 a.m. on Sept. 7, it notified the Bush administration of its secret acquisition. It gave two senior officials access on the condition that the officials not reveal they had it until the al-Qaeda release.

Within 20 minutes, a range of intelligence agencies had begun downloading it from the company's Web site. By midafternoon that day, the video and a transcript of its audio track had been leaked from within the Bush administration to cable television news and broadcast worldwide.

The founder of the company, the SITE Intelligence Group, says this premature disclosure tipped al-Qaeda to a security breach and destroyed a years-long surveillance operation that the company has used to intercept and pass along secret messages, videos and advance warnings of suicide bombings from the terrorist group's communications network.

"Techniques that took years to develop are now ineffective and worthless," said Rita Katz, the firm's 44-year-old founder, who has garnered wide attention by publicizing statements and videos from extremist chat rooms and Web sites, while attracting controversy over the secrecy of SITE's methodology. Her firm provides intelligence about terrorist groups to a wide range of paying clients, including private firms and military and intelligence agencies from the United States and several other countries.
It looks like they were trying to show how effective and on top of things they are - "lookey, we got a sneak preview of the new Osama video". Like usual, they're shameless ploy backfired, and they reiterated how incompetent and untrustworthy they are. What's even worse is that they didn't even try to hide the source of where they got the video. "A copy posted around 3 p.m. on Fox News's Web site referred to SITE and included page markers identical to those used by the group." They did everything except reveal names, addresses and photographs (maybe they did that too).

We're supposed to trust this administration to keep us safe from terrorists? We're supposed to trust this administration for anything? Is there nothing that these clowns can't fuck up? And they wonder why American citizens don't want them spying on our private lives. They keep reminding us how cavalier they are about leaking any information they find - no matter how sensitive - into the public domain. Unless it's about them or what they're doing or what undisclosed location they're hiding or who they're meeting while running the country (into the ground) - then it's top secret.

FAIL!

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, October 8, 2007
The Coalition of the Shrinking
posted by Wally
12:28 PM

Even the Brits are bailing out on Bush's Iraq occupation, planning to cut troop levels by 50%
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has said the number of UK troops in Iraq will fall from the current level of 5,500 to 2,500 by next spring.

Speaking in the House of Commons, Brown said Britain plans to move from leading Iraqi troops into an "overwatch" role in the next two months and then reduce the numbers from 5,500 to 4,500 "immediately after provincial Iraqi control, and then to 4,000."

He said that "in the second stage of overwatch in the spring, and guided as always by advice of military commanders" the reduction will be to 2,500 troops -- "with a further decision about the next phase made then."
How much does George miss his little lap-dog Tony lately? I can almost picture him in his little Paul Revere costume, riding his hobby-horse around the Oval Office shouting....

The British are leaving! The British are leaving!


Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Escalating the war - pushing closer to war with Iran
posted by Wally
6:58 AM

Last month the Congress passed a resolution calling the Iranian Elite Revolutionary Guard a "terrorist" group. Of those who noticed, many (including us) saw this as one more step on the road to fulfilling Bush and Cheney's dream of invading Iran.

On Sunday, another step was taken, as they U.S. tried to associate Iranian government officials with the Revolutionary Guard - thereby inferring by association that the Iranian Government is also a terrorist organization.
The American military command here increased its criticism of Iran on Sunday, accusing that country's ambassador of undisclosed membership in a Revolutionary Guard force and announcing the arrests of three men it described as Iranian agents responsible for kidnappings and weapons smuggling.

The United States has increasingly accused Iran of involvement in planning and executing attacks against Iraq's government and American military operations in Iraq - accusations that the Iranian government has repeatedly denied.

But Sunday appeared to be the first instance in which the Americans had publicly asserted that Iran's top diplomat in Iraq was himself a member of the Revolutionary Guard.

"The Quds Force controls the policy for Iraq; there should be no confusion about that either," General Petraeus said. "The ambassador is a Quds Force member. Now he has diplomatic immunity and therefore he is obviously not subject - and he is acting as a diplomat."
Of course Patraeus wouldn't give details about the "absolute assurance" that he had that the ambassador was a member of the force, or about why there should be "no confusion" about the Quds controlling the policy. Apparently, we're just supposed to trust him, just like we were expected to trust Colin Powell back in 2002 when he showed us a vial of talcum powder and some cartoon pictures of "mobile weapons labs" and tried to scare the shit out of us about anthrax and mushroom clouds.

Note that the U.S. hasn't come flat out and called the Iranian government terrorists. At least not yet. But this is another step down that road. To anyone who's been paying attention, and who paid even passing attention to the build-up to the Iraq war, this should be fairly transparent.

War begins with Dubya

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
6:15 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya visiting a mosque.

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, October 7, 2007
When will Rush attack their service?
posted by Clyde
6:36 AM

New military leaders question Iraq mission

Four and a half years after the nation's top military leaders saluted and fell in behind President Bush's pre-emptive invasion of Iraq, their replacements are beginning to question the mission and sound alarms about the toll the war is taking on the Army and the Marine Corps.

The change at the Pentagon is striking but little-noticed, in part because Defense Secretary Robert Gates, a longtime veteran of the CIA, is quiet where his predecessor Donald H. Rumsfeld was not.

"It's part of a sea change," said Loren Thompson, a military analyst at the Lexington Institute, a national-security research center in Washington. "The ideologues have been replaced by managers who view Iraq not as a cause, but a problem to be solved."

Gates, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Michael Mullen, Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England, Undersecretary for Intelligence Gen. James Clapper and other top officials also are concerned that the war may be crippling the military's ability to respond to other crises. They have allies in the congressional Democratic leadership - particularly House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Ike Skelton of Missouri - who've been speaking out about that for months.

(Link)

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Apartheid - It's not just for South Africa anymore
posted by Clyde
6:17 AM

S. Africa's silent war in Iraq

Andre Durant, a burly policeman from this leafy African capital, was kidnapped 10 months ago by unidentified gunmen in Iraq. Apart from one brief phone call, in which Durant managed to shout a strangled "I love you" to his wife, he hasn't been heard from since.

Yet there are no yellow ribbons trimming Durant's quiet suburban Pretoria house, as hopeful ribbons might adorn the home of a U.S. soldier missing in Iraq. There has been no drumbeat of sympathetic news coverage about his case, as one would expect when a local man gets sucked into a global story in the world's most notorious war zone. Indeed, Durant's family, like the families of three other South Africans who were snatched with Durant in a Baghdad ambush in December, has maintained an anguished and puzzling silence for the better part of a year.

And in that hush lies a clue to this African nation's murky and angst-ridden participation in America's military adventure in the Middle East: Durant is one of thousands of South African police officers and soldiers, most of them white veterans of the old apartheid regime, who have left their jobs to work as private security contractors in Iraq -- a semiclandestine exodus of hired guns that has alternately embarrassed and alarmed the pacifist government here.

(Link)

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, October 6, 2007
Take this job and shove it!
posted by Clyde
6:40 AM

War-Crimes Prosecutor Quits in Pentagon Clash

In the latest disruption of the Bush administration's plan to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for war crimes, the chief military prosecutor on the project stepped down yesterday after a dispute with a Pentagon official.

It was not clear what effect the departure would have on the problem-plagued effort to charge and try detainees.

The prosecutor, Col. Morris D. Davis of the Air Force, was to leave his position immediately, a Defense Department spokeswoman said. But the spokeswoman, Cynthia O. Smith, said officials were working to minimize interruption in the work of the prosecution office, which includes military lawyers supplemented by civilian federal prosecutors.

"The department is taking measures to ensure a prompt and orderly transition to another chief prosecutor without interrupting the key mission of prosecuting war crimes via military commissions," Ms. Smith said.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

He fought the law and the law... won?
posted by Clyde
6:25 AM

Watada Court-Marshal Delayed

A federal judge in Tacoma has delayed the court-martial of 1st Lt. Ehren Watada, a Fort Lewis Army officer who refused to deploy to Iraq.

In a rare intervention of a civilian court in the military justice system, U.S. District Court Judge Benjamin Settle granted the emergency stay to stop the court-martial.

Watada's trial, slated to begin at 9 a.m. Tuesday, is now postponed until at least Oct. 26, the judge ruled.

In granting the stay at 4:48 p.m. Friday, Settle wrote, "The court concludes as a preliminary matter, that it has jurisdiction over the petition and the petitioner's double jeopardy claim is not frivolous."

(Link)

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, October 5, 2007
Jealous of our freedom? What freedom is that, exactly?
posted by Wally
3:05 PM

Submitted by: Jenna

OK, so Ahmadinejad was allowed to speak at Columbia recently and rightly so. We are a nation of free speech and not allowing him a forum to speak would have been hypocritical since we claim to want the same freedoms for Middle Eastern countries like Iran. It sparked protests (both for and against) but in the end certainly nobody took him seriously as he denied the Holocaust and claimed there are no gay people in Iran.

Let's move now to peaceful, idyllic Minnesota. A youth group planning a peace conference at the University of St. Thomas invites Nobel Peace Prize winner Desmond Tutu to speak about peace and peacemaking. University leaders have decided they would not allow Tutu on campus because of criticisms he has made about Israel's treatment of Palestinians and the powerful Jewish lobby in the United States. This also sparked protest - from a Jewish adjunct professor who was 'incensed at the decision' and a professor in St. Thomas' Justice and Peace Studies Program, who was then stripped of her leadership post. Huh - a professor of Justice and Peace Studies punished for pointing out the injustice of not allowing the speech. How 'ironical'.

So in our twisted American world, we have managed to treat the nutty dictator Ahmadinejad better than a Nobel Peace Prize winner and opponent of apartheid. And we have the nerve to say that anyone who does not respect our country is simply jealous of our freedom. What freedom is that, exactly?

University of St. Thomas won't let Desmond Tutu speak on campus

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush "We don't torture people. But you can't see those memos defining how we don't torture people"
posted by Wally
2:35 PM

Dubya came out on Friday and took excruciating pains to make his stance on torture - and it's a wide one - as clear as he possibly could - which, being who he is, isn't very. (okay, so he didn't go through any pain at all, but it's Friday afternoon and I can't resist a bad pun.)
"This government does not torture people." Bush said his administration sticks to "U.S. law and our international obligations."

He said, "The techniques that we use have been fully disclosed to appropriate members of the United States Congress."

CIA spokesman George Little issued a statement saying all interrogations are conducted "in strict accord with U.S. law."

"The agency's terrorist detention and interrogation program has been conducted lawfully, with great care and close review, including extensive discussion within the executive branch and oversight from Congress," Little said.
My question to Mr. Little is this: In strict accordance with which U.S. law? The "official" law that was so ceremoniously released to the public, or the law in the secret Justice Department memos that have NOT been "fully disclosed to ... the United States Congress"? If there has beem such great "oversight from Congress" why are they still waiting for the White House to release the top secret "torture" memos?
The New York Times disclosed the memos in Thursday's editions. It reported that the first 2005 legal opinion authorized the use during terrorism interrogations of slaps to the head, freezing conditions and simulated drownings, known as water-boarding.

That secret opinion explicitly allowed using the painful methods in combination and was issued "soon after" Alberto R. Gonzales became attorney general in February 2005, the New York Times reported. In a December 2004 opinion, the Justice Department had publicly declared torture "abhorrent," and the administration seemed to back away from claiming authority for such practices.

A second secret Justice Department opinion was issued later in 2005, as Congress was working on an anti-torture bill. That opinion said none of the CIA's interrogation practices would violate the legislation's bans on "cruel, inhuman and degrading" treatment of detainees, the New York Times said, citing interviews with unnamed current and former officials.

The memos....do not reverse the administration policy issued in 2004 that publicly renounced torture, White House and Justice Department spokespeople said.
In that case, the White House and the Dept of Justice should be falling over each other in an effort to immediately release the memos in their entirety in order to clarify the issue, eliminate any misunderstanding or doubt, and prove that everything is above board - above waterboard even. While they're at it, maybe they can explain why you're still secretly holding prisoners in "black sites" overseas:
The New York Times on Thursday reported the CIA was again holding prisoners at "black sites" overseas, and that the Justice Department under then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales had issued a secret opinion in 2005 that endorsed the harshest interrogation techniques ever used by the CIA.

The detention program, first revealed by The Washington Post in late 2005 and then acknowledged by Bush in September 2006, provoked an international outcry, with critics accusing the administration of secretly using torture to interrogate terrorism suspects.

Bush said all 14 high-level terrorism suspects held at that time had been transferred to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. But the Defense Department said in April it had taken custody of a suspected al Qaeda leader who had spent months in CIA custody before his transfer.
If everything is on the up and up, why do these secret revelations keep percolating to the surface? If they don't torture and never approved of torture, then why don't they let us see the memos stating that policy? To use a Republican talking point, if they haven't done anything wrong, they have nothing to worry about. Let us search their files and their houses and their computer records, just like they do to us. Come on George, come on Republicans, you say you're innocent. You have nothing to worry about, right?
Right?
Yeah, I thought so.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

How bad is it?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:14 PM

You're the President of the United States and at one time had an approval rating close to 90%. Now, you're rating is almost half that as a President who was impeached over a b.j.

In Latest Poll, Good News for Both Clintons

Former president Bill Clinton has emerged as a clear asset in his wife's campaign for the White House, with Americans offering high ratings to his eight years in office and a solid majority saying they would be comfortable with him as first spouse, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

But Americans said they would not regard the election of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) as simply the resumption of her husband's presidency. Instead, two-thirds said she would take her presidency in a different direction, and half of all Americans said they believed that would be a good development. About half of those who said it would be a resumption described that as positive.

.....

The former president is very much at the center of his wife's campaign -- helping to raise money, muscling endorsements, providing strategic and policy advice, and joining her on the trail. But, after the political and personal turbulence that occurred during his two terms in the White House, there have been persistent questions about whether the nation is eager for what could amount to a third Clinton presidential term.

At this point, however, the former president is seen in favorable terms. Two-thirds of Americans said they approve of the job he did while he was in office -- virtually the reverse of President Bush's current approval rating, which stands at 33 percent. Clinton remains overwhelmingly popular among Democrats, and 63 percent of independents and even a third of Republicans also gave him positive marks.

33% = "The Base"

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Screw 'em. They're too young to vote.
posted by Wally
8:37 AM

It's not just Dubya that hates children, it's become a Republican mantra. All four of the leading GOP candidates think that poor and middle class children neither need nor deserve adequate health care. All of them support Bush's veto of the SCHIP bill expanding coverage to help make sure that more kids have health insurance.

McCain:
"I certainly would favor an increase, but I think that a $35 billion increase which is funded by a bogus proposal which is a, quote, one dollar increase tax on cigarettes and somewhere around 2012 it basically disappears is not an unfunded liability I think we ought to lay on the next generation."
What McCain is saying is that asking the next generation to pay 35 billion for their own healthcare is bad, but asking them to pay 20 times that much (nearly 700 billion and counting) to kill people in Iraq is good. Making his analogy worse is that this is not an "unfunded liability", since the bill proposes a way to pay for it in the form of a the tax increase on cigarettes.

Guiliani:
"typical Democratic, Clinton kind of thing." and "Half to two-thirds of the children that they're going to take care of already have private insurance."
Thank you for calling it a Democratic Clinton thing - reminding us all of those 8 years of peace and prosperity. If "1/2 to 2/3" of 4.5 million kids are already covered (a number, by the way, that he reached deep into his anus to come up with), that still leaves 1.5 to 2.25 million kids who are NOT covered. Why do you hate all those children, Rudy?

Romney:
"Can you imagine doing something like that in your enterprise, saying we want to get a new customer, so we're going to lower the price to get this new account by 10 percent but then we're going to go to all of our old customers and all give them 10 percent off too?"
Actually Mitt, I can imagine that. It's called a "Sale" and it happens all the time. But you wouldn't know about that, because you send your hired help out to do the shopping so you don't have to mingle with the unwashed masses. All that aside, however, here is Mitt trying to tell us how much better privatization works than government oversight. Think of Enron (privatized utility) and Blackwater (privatized military) for a nice illustration of his point. While we're at it, why not privatize our fire departments and police and water and sewage utilities.

Thompson:
He probably mumbled something vaguely coherent - or not - but nobody was paying attention. Then he asked his audience if he could have a round of applause and all 3 of them complied.

4.5 million children left behind

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:39 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of dubya hugging South Africa's President Thabo Mbeki at the UN Security Council meeting.


Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, October 4, 2007
Sen. Craig (R-ID) vows to serve out Senate term
posted by Wally
2:45 PM

Idaho Sen. Larry Craig defiantly vowed to serve out his term in office on Thursday despite losing a court attempt to rescind his guilty plea in a men's room sex sting.

"I have seen that it is possible for me to work here effectively," Craig said in a written statement certain to disappoint fellow Republicans who have long urged him to step down.
What, exactly, did he see in the Senate that made him think so?


(I don't know who this is, but.....)

Personally, we couldn't be happier about him staying in the Senate to serve out his term rather than resigning. This way it will keep this story in the news through the 2008 campaign season, will play against the Republican running to replace Craig in that open Senate seat, and will prevent a Republican from claiming incumbency in that seat (which is a huge advantage in Senate races). This story is the gift that keeps on giving.

Thank you Larry

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

MN Judge Says No Flip-Flop for Larry Craig.
posted by Wally
12:45 PM

Which is good, since it seems like it would be harder - and creepier - for him to tap his toes in flip-flops than in wing-tips.

A Minnesota judge told Senator Larry Craig (R-ID) that he can't change his stance, refusing to allow him to withdraw his guilty plea for soliciting sex in the Minneapolis airport men's room.
"Because the defendant's plea was accurate, voluntary and intelligent, and because the conviction is supported by the evidence ... the Defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea is denied," Hennepin County Judge Charles Porter wrote.

Craig was arrested June 11 by an airport police officer in a bathroom sex sting. The officer said Craig had looked into his bathroom stall, and tapped his foot and moved his hand under the divider in a way that suggested he was looking for a sexual partner.

When the charges first surfaced, Craig said he would resign by Sept. 30. But then he decided to attempt to reopen his legal case, and said he would stay at least until he found out whether he could withdraw his plea.
Pleads guilty, then says he's not-guilty. Says he will resign, then won't resign, then maybe will resign again. And the Republicans called John Kerry a flip flopper?

Not Gay

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Another GOP Senate Seat Up For Grabs - Pete "fire prosecutor Iglesias for not prosecuting Democrats" Domenici (R-NM) to retire
posted by Wally
8:44 AM

Yet another Republican senator is retiring at the end of his term in 2008, leaving another seat up for grabs. Unless the Democrats royally screw up, there is a very real possibility that they could win a filibuster-proof majority in the 2008 elections. With the current state of the Democratic party leadership, we're not stupid enough to bet against the Democrats royally screwing up, but we're still happy to see Domenici gone.
A fifth Republican senator intends to retire at the end of his term next year, Republican officials said. The development increases the possibility of a wider Democratic majority in the Senate.

The officials said 75-year-old Sen. Pete Domenici, a senator for 36 years, intends to retire at the end of his term next year for health reasons.

He is expected to say in a formal announcement Thursday that he suffers from frontotemporal lobar degeneration, a progressive disease that in some forms can cause dysfunction in the parts of the brain important for organization, decision-making and control of mood and behavior.

Int'l Herald Tribune
That explains a lot. Makes me wonder how long he's had the disease. Maybe for the past three decades or so. (in order to pre-empt the inevitable flames for making fun of a sick guy, I have this to say - fuck him. Tell it to the troops he keeps voting to keep in Iraq. Tell it to the widows and orphans and wounded soldiers and innocents both here and in Iraq. Until very recently he was a big proponent of the war. He's complicit in the war and in all the crimes committed in the name of the war, right along with Bush and Cheney and the entire administration and nearly all of Congress. There is a sea of blood on his hands. My wish for him is for that thought to haunt him every minute of every day for as long as his brain continues to function).

Aside from being a shill for mining and oil interests for the majority of his career, Pete is most famous, at least recently, for his role in the Department of Justice attorney firings scandal - the one that finally cost Fredo Gonzalez his job. It seems his brain malfunction is not the only thing on his mind.
In addition to health concerns, Domenici's legal and political fortunes soured last winter when the senator -- known as "St. Pete" back home -- was caught up in the controversy involving the sudden firings of U.S. attorneys by the Bush administration.

Iglesias testified at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that his onetime patron, who had helped him to secure the federal post, angrily called him in late October asking about his corruption investigation of Albuquerque Democrats. When Domenici learned that no indictments were pending, he hung up on the prosecutor, Iglesias said. A week or so later, Iglesias's name was added to a dismissal list compiled by top staff at the Justice Department.

The incident prompted the Senate ethics committee seven months ago to investigate Domenici's actions. The probe remains ongoing. Domenici was forced to hire a high-priced criminal defense lawyer to handle the ethics case.

Republican Ethics = contradiction in terms
Whether the real reason is health, or the sting of ethics investigation, or to "spend more time with family", or a combination of these and other things, all I can say is, Pete, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush's Dept of Justice's secret fight to be able to legally torture people
posted by Wally
6:33 AM

I know most of you will find this hard to believe, but when Dubya famously said "we don't do torture" back in 2005, he was lying. Can you believe it? George Dubya Bush not being completely open and truthful with the American people. As hard as that may be to fathom, it's unfortunately true. It turns out that Bush is not only capable of lying, but he also thinks that torturing fellow human beings is just fine and dandy.

This New York Times article gives some new details about Bush's Justice Department not only approving "enhanced interrogation techniques" (according to Bush's DOJ, these techniques not torture "unless they produce pain equivalent to organ failure or even death") they actually "endorsing" them.
The debate over how terrorism suspects should be held and questioned began shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, when the Bush administration adopted secret detention and coercive interrogation, both practices the United States had previously denounced when used by other countries. It adopted the new measures without public debate or Congressional vote, choosing to rely instead on the confidential legal advice of a handful of appointees.

Never in history had the United States authorized such tactics. While President Bush and C.I.A. officials would later insist that the harsh measures produced crucial intelligence, many veteran interrogators, psychologists and other experts say that less coercive methods are equally or more effective.

With virtually no experience in interrogations, the C.I.A. had constructed its program in a few harried months by consulting Egyptian and Saudi intelligence officials and copying Soviet interrogation methods....
What a fabulous example to be emulating! That's like your kid telling you he wants to be like Jeffrey Dahmer or John Wayne Gacy when he grows up. What the hell were these people thinking? I thought we had worked all this out decades ago, and signed onto a rather straightforward "Convention" in Geneva that spelled out how captors are to be treated (i.e. "humanely").
The administration had always asserted that the C.I.A.'s pressure tactics did not amount to torture, which is banned by federal law and international treaty. But officials had privately decided the agency did not have to comply with another provision in the Convention Against Torture - the prohibition on "cruel, inhuman, or degrading" treatment.
How sick and twisted are these people that they are parsing words and juggling "legalize" to rationalize torturing people? The fact that they worked so hard to find legal justification for being cruel and inhumane makes me sick. This doesn't surprise me coming from Bush or Gonzalez or Cheney or any of those people. As James Comey said (he's the guy who stood by Ashcroft's hospital bed and refused to let Gonzales strong-arm him into signing off on allowing illegal wiretapping) "It takes far more than a sharp legal mind to say 'no' when it matters most. It takes moral character."

Moral character is a commodity sorely lacking in the Bush administration and the Republican party of late. But I still find it disturbing that torture was and is allowed to happen. I find it even more frightening that torture was and is officially "endorsed" at the highest level of government. Worst of all, nobody is being held accountable for it.

Can we please put impeachment back on the table?

Who would Jesus torture?

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, October 3, 2007
"Hindsight is 50/50"? Maybe for republicans.
posted by Wally
9:11 AM

According to Katherine Harris, voters should educate themselves on the issues through conservative blogs because newspapers are biased.

Former U.S. Rep. Katherine Harris told guests at a family values conference that she is "catching up" after devoting her life to politics for the last 12 years.

Speaking about the war in Iraq, she said that some mistakes were made, but that "hindsight is 50/50."
Well, for her it probably is.
She said she thanks God for "unanswered prayers."
What about the ones that were answered?

Crazy-ass psycho-biatch

(props to Jenna for the great catch - I mean the story, not the possum)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush Hates Children
posted by Wally
8:46 AM

Does Does this qualify as "compassonate conservatism" or "culture of life"

Bush vetoes bill on children's health care

U.S. President George W. Bush on Wednesday vetoed a measure to expand a popular children's health care program, launching the first in a series of major battles with Democrats over domestic spending.

The legislation would have provided an extra $35 billion over five years for the health program, which is administered by the states. Taxes on tobacco products would have been raised to pay for the increase.

The health bill enjoyed bipartisan support. The veto is likely to anger a number in Bush's own Republican Party who fear the issue will cost them votes in the congressional and presidential elections.

Supporters of the bill said it would have helped provide health coverage for some 10 million children.

Just like Bush's attitude towards the soldiers, they're not his kids, so fuck 'em.

Pro-life my ass

Not only did he veto it, he didn't have the sack to do it publicly.
It was only the fourth veto of Bush's presidency, and one that some Republicans feared could carry steep risks for their party in next year's elections. The Senate approved the bill with enough votes to override the veto, but the margin in the House fell short of the required number.

The White House sought as little attention as possible, with the president wielding his veto behind closed doors without any fanfare or news coverage.
CoWard

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

At 83, Carter still has more balls than Bush ever will
posted by Wally
6:32 AM

While Dubya is sneaking in and out of foreign countries like Iraq in the middle of the night, or making unscheduled trips to "friendly" nations to avoid actually seeing the unwashed public masses (remember when he flew into Australia 2 days early for the APEC meeting?), while he's travelling, even in his own country, hidden away in convoys of armored limosines, with anyone who resembling a dissident or protestor being sequestered off out of sight and out of earshot in "free speech zones" in order to avoid conflict, while Bush is being an overprotected pussy, 83 year old Jimmy Carter is walking, yes, "walking" into places like a war-torn Darfur town, and telling the Sudanese security officials that are trying to keep him out to suck it. (wow, run on sentence from hell).
Jimmy Carter faces down Darfur officials

Former President Carter got in a shouting match Wednesday with Sudanese security officials who blocked him from a town in Darfur where he was trying to meet representatives of ethnic African refugees from the ongoing conflict.

The 83-year-old Carter walked into this highly volatile pro-Sudanese government town to meet refugees too frightened to attend a scheduled meeting at a nearby compound.

"You can't go. It's not on the program!" the local national security chief, who only gave his first name as Omar, yelled at Carter, who is in Darfur as part of a delegation of respected international figures known as "The Elders."

"We're going to anyway!" an angry Carter retorted, telling security officers they didn't have the authority to stop him.
This is what America is supposed to be about. Facing the world - the difficult, wartorn, hopeless places - and trying to help people and bring peace and hope - that is the American way. Talking tough while launching "shock and awe" air assaults halfway around the world from the safety of the Oval Office is NOT the American way - at least not the way I was brought up.

And the Republicans still call President Carter weak. Morans.

Bring 'em on

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:26 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya and outgoing chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Peter Pace.

Permalink :: 12 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, October 2, 2007
Promises Promises
posted by Wally
12:57 PM

In 2006, Americans elected a Democratic majority in both the House and the Senate, in hopes that the Democrats would stand up to Bush and end the war. Now they are apparently beginning to realize that Bush is too stubborn or too stupid to pull out of Iraq, no matter what Congress or the American people do (not that either has done much of anything, really) and that the only way to end Bush's war is to cut off funding. It also appears that they are overwhelmingly in favor of this idea:
Most Americans want Iraq war funding cut: poll

Most Americans oppose fully funding President George W. Bush's $190 billion request to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan while a majority supports expanding a children's health care program he has threatened to veto, a Washington Post-ABC News poll shows.

Only about 25 percent of Americans support the administration's $190 billion war funding request; 70 percent want the proposed allocation reduced, the Post said.
70 percent! That's way beyond a "landslide" percentage. That's a serious mandate right there. So what are the Democrats in Congress doing with this "political capital"? What are they doing to meet the demands of the overwhelming majority of Americans who want them to cut funding for the war?

In the House, they're proposing a method to provide funding for the war. Not just any funding method. They chose one particularly salient to the right wing spin machine: They are proposing new taxes:
Three senior House Democrats are proposing a new tax to pay for the Iraq war, as well as vowing to oppose any funding bill for Iraq that does not include a policy for ending the conflict.

House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D-Wis.), Rep. Jack Murtha (D-Pa.), chairman of the Defense subcommittee on House Appropriations, and Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), will soon unveil a "surtax" on taxes owed by Americans to help cover the cost of the war, the trio announced this morning.

The tax is designed to raise $140 billion to $150 billion annually, and would range from a 2% surtax on low-income Americans to as much as 15% for wealthy taxpayers.
Granted, their intentions are good - they are hoping that the tax "will generate additional opposition in the American public against the war." But seriously, have they not been watching the neo-con playbook for the past 20 years? I can already hear the 24/7 talking points on Fox news - "those tax crazy Democrats are wanting to steal your hard earned money again". If Murtha and Obey and McGovern haven't figured this out yet, maybe someone needs to lift the rock they'be been under and drag them out.

But it's even worse in the Senate. They're not even pretending anymore. They didn't just cave, they rolled over like good puppies so Georgie could rub their collective bellies. They took that 70% majority to heart, and voted 92-3 in favor of continuing to fund the wars:
Thwarted in efforts to bring troops home from Iraq, Senate Democrats on Monday helped pass a defense policy bill authorizing another $150 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Hoping the political landscape changes in coming months, Democratic leaders say they will renew their fight when Congress considers the money Bush wants in war funding.

While the Senate policy bill authorizes the money to be spent, it does not guarantee it; Bush will have to wait until Congress passes a separate appropriations bill before war funds are transferred to military coffers.

"I think that's where you're going to see the next dogfight," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., of the upcoming war spending bill.
Oh please Harry, give it a rest. "Next dogfight" my ass. George has his "fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here", Cheney has his "reconstituted nuclear weapons programs", Giuliani has his "9/11 9/11 9/11", and you have your "next dogfight".

If it wasn't so damn disastrous for the country and the world, it would be laughable.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Only if they all sign "loyalty oaths"...
posted by Wally
12:26 PM

...and promise not to ask any hard questions.
Iranian University Invites Bush to Speak

An Iranian university has invited US leader George W Bush to speak following his Iranian counterpart's hostile reception at a US college last week.

"We're not taking it too seriously," said a White House spokeswoman.

She said Mr Bush might have considered the invitation if Iran allowed freedom of expression, did not have nuclear ambitions, and did not threaten Israel.
Of course Bush is refusing to show up. One, he'd have to learn to pronounce long names instead of just using stupid nicknames like he does to the press corp. Two, he wouldn't be able to plant "rally squads" in the audience to shout down anyone who disagreed with him or held up a sign or wore a t-shirt he didn't like. Three, he might actually be faced with a difficult question, and then a follow-up question asking him to clarify his bumbling rambling non-answer. Four, and most importantly, he's just flat out too much of a pussy to go anywhere even vaguely dangerous - and don't give me any shit about him going to Baghdad to serve plastic turkey to the troops. He snuck in like a rat under cover of darkness and was back on his way home again before anyone even knew he left Crawford - or to go anywhere that he can't be absolutely guaranteed to have a fawning adoring audience.

He's probably justified on the fourth point - being afraid to go, since he is wildly, even dangerously despised in much of the world and especially the Middle East. Unlike our former Presidents (Carter, Bush the smarter, Clinton), it would quite possibly be life-threatening for Little Boots to show his face in that part of the world. That's not to say that he shouldn't go anyway. As the leader of the free world, that's part of his job. If he's too much of a pussy to do his job, he should resign.

So I say, do it George. Man up and go to Iran. Speak at the University. Heck, you can use it as a forum to try to talk them into giving up nukes and thereby begin the peace process. Show them what a wise and brilliant and courageous "leader" you are. I dare you.

Can't spell "coward" without "W"

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

A couple "Phony Soldiers" respond to Rush "anal cyst" Limbaugh
posted by Wally
8:13 AM

Brian McGough, Iraq War Vet and Purple Heart Recipient


Major General (Ret.) John Batiste

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Last one out turn off the lights
posted by Wally
6:22 AM

With all these major Republican Bush-loving core groups swinging left. Who's going to be left to support the GOP?

White Christian Fundies:
Young White Evangelicals: Less Republican, Still Conservative

White evangelicals are typically analyzed as a group, but an examination of the younger generation (those ages 18-29) provides evidence that white evangelicals may be undergoing some significant political changes. An analysis of surveys conducted between 2001 and 2007 by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press suggests that younger white evangelicals have become increasingly dissatisfied with Bush and are moving away from the GOP.

In 2002, for example, an overwhelming majority (87%) approved of Bush's job performance. By August 2007, however, Bush's approval rating among this group had plummeted by 42 percentage points, with most of the drop (25 points) coming since 2005.
Big Business:
GOP Is Losing Grip On Core Business Vote

The Republican Party, known since the late 19th century as the party of business, is losing its lock on that title.

New evidence suggests a potentially historic shift in the Republican Party's identity -- what strategists call its "brand." The votes of many disgruntled fiscal conservatives and other lapsed Republicans are now up for grabs, which could alter U.S. politics in the 2008 elections and beyond.

Some business leaders are drifting away from the party because of the war in Iraq, the growing federal debt and a conservative social agenda they don't share. In manufacturing sectors such as the auto industry, some Republicans want direct government help with soaring health-care costs, which Republicans in Washington have been reluctant to provide. And some business people want more government action on global warming, arguing that a bolder plan is not only inevitable, but could spur new industries.

Polling data confirm business support for Republicans is eroding. In the Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll in September, 37% of professionals and managers identify themselves as Republican or leaning Republican, down from 44% three years ago.
The Military:
Military contributions shift - away from the GOP

Since the start of the Iraq war in 2003, members of the U.S. military have dramatically increased their political contributions to Democrats, marching sharply away from the party they've long supported.

The shift is more than just a few percentage points. In 2002, the last full cycle before Bush launched the Iraqi invasion, the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics found that 23% of military members' contributions went to Democrats. So far in 2007, that number is 40%.

More specifically, the drop-off for Republican support within the Army is striking. Before the war, 71% of Army campaign contributions went to the GOP. This year, that number is down to 51%. So, the GOP's advantage went from more than 2-to-1 before the war, to near-parity now.
With the "base" leaving, is the GOP starting to collapse? Now it's up to the Democrats to show some balls and/or brain to take advantage of this trend and actually DO something.

Hey, I can dream, can't I?

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, October 1, 2007
Dana Perino, dumb shit
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
3:15 PM

This chick makes Tony Snow look smart. Oh, and is Bush slamming his Lord and saviour Ronald Reagan and holy son Fred Thompson?

Bush attacks 'Hollywood values'

US President George W. Bush ripped into "Hollywood values" on Monday, in a surprise attack at the entertainment industry that overwhelmingly backs his Democratic foes.

Bush's rhetorical broadside came as he paid tribute to the new chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, US Navy Admiral Mike Mullen, noting that his parents were well regarded behind-the-scenes players in the US movie industry.

"Many people are surprised when told about the admiral's show business roots. After all, he is humble, well-grounded and filled with common sense. Not exactly what one thinks about when they think of Hollywood values," said Bush.

...

Asked whether this was a veiled snub aimed at Republican presidential hopeful Fred Thompson, a former senator with a long career as an actor, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino incredulously replied: "No."

"I don't know how you're drawing that connection," she said.

Fred=Law & Order=Actor=Hollywood
Perino is a dumb shit.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Actions speak louder than lies words
posted by Wally
1:11 PM

Especially when those lies words are coming from Bush or anyone in his administration.

Words:
White House dismisses report of Iran attack plans

The White House today is dismissing the report of a seasoned journalist that the Bush administration, intent on attacking Iran, has shifted its target from a developing nuclear program in Iran to the supply lines of Iranians reinforcing insurgent fighters inside Iraq.

She (Dana Perino) declined to address, however, the basic contention that U.S. miltiary planners and intelligence gathers have turned their focus to a "shifting target" in Iran.

"We don't discuss such things," she said. "What we have said is that we are working toward a diplomatic solution in Iran... What we also have said is that the president, and any commander in chief would, not take any option off the table.

"I'm not going to comment on any possible scenario that an anonymous source continues to feed into Sy Hersh," she said -- also resisting repeated questions about whether the president would attack Iran without seeking congressional approval. "We are pursuing a diplomatic solution in Iran."
So Dana, explain to us how this "diplomatic" solution involves this:

Actions:
US trains Gulf air forces for war with Iran

The American air force is working with military leaders from the Gulf to train and prepare Arab air forces for a possible war with Iran, The Sunday Telegraph can reveal.

An air warfare conference in Washington last week was told how American air chiefs have helped to co-ordinate intelligence-sharing with Gulf Arab nations and organise combined exercises designed to make it easier to fight together.

Gen Michael Mosley, the US Air Force chief of staff, used the conference to seek closer links with allies whose support America might need if President George W Bush chooses to bomb Iran.

Pentagon air chiefs have helped set up an air warfare centre in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) where Gulf nations are training their fighter pilots and America has big bases. It is modelled on the US Air Force warfare centre at Nellis air force base in Nevada.
We're training them so they are prepared to fight against us in the next war, just like we trained and armed Bin Laden, just like we trained and armed Saddam Hussein. Good plan Dubya.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

"It is the official, considered position of the state of Texas that President Bush is a constitutionally ignorant power-grabber."
posted by Wally
8:27 AM

An unusual case that the Supreme Court will hear as it begins its new term features Texas accusing its former chief executive of overstepping his office, by ordering Texas judges to comply with an International Court of Justice ruling involving a condemned killer from Mexico.

"It is, in my judgment, a breathtaking order," the state's chief appeals lawyer, Solicitor General Ted Cruz, said a few days ago as he previewed his arguments for the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group. "This president's exercise of this power is egregiously beyond the bounds of presidential authority."

(snip)

Imagine, he argued, what President Dick Cheney might do, or President Hillary Rodham Clinton - a boogeyman for each side - if they were free to "flick state laws off the books on a simple assertion of international comity."

"A president could say it would further international comity 'big time' - that's a technical legal term, 'big time' - if we set aside the death penalty laws," Mr. Cruz said. "Those scenarios are downright scary. That is not the legitimate constitutional role of the president."
It took them this long to figure out that "Bush is a constitutionally ignorant power-grabber"? We've been saying this for years.

It's just a goddamn peice of paper

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush's Reason du Jour for Invading Iran
posted by Wally
7:37 AM

Just like in the run-up to the Iraq invasion, the story keeps changing, with one reason after another being proposed for why we have no choice but to invade. Apparently, now the Bush White House is moving from the "They're building nukes! There's gonna be a holocaust! Everybody panic!" rationale to a more toned down, but wildly self-contradictary and illogical "we have to invade Iran to protect our troops" logic. I'm not shitting you. Somehow, in Bush's mind, sending troops into yet another theater of war (this time against an actual "army" with real weapons) will protect them.
In a series of public statements in recent months, President Bush and members of his Administration have redefined the war in Iraq, to an increasing degree, as a strategic battle between the United States and Iran. "Shia extremists, backed by Iran, are training Iraqis to carry out attacks on our forces and the Iraqi people," Bush told the national convention of the American Legion in August. "The attacks on our bases and our troops by Iranian-supplied munitions have increased. . . . The Iranian regime must halt these actions. And, until it does, I will take actions necessary to protect our troops." He then concluded, to applause, "I have authorized our military commanders in Iraq to confront Tehran's murderous activities."

The President's position, and its corollary-that, if many of America's problems in Iraq are the responsibility of Tehran, then the solution to them is to confront the Iranians-have taken firm hold in the Administration. This summer, the White House, pushed by the office of Vice-President Dick Cheney, requested that the Joint Chiefs of Staff redraw long-standing plans for a possible attack on Iran, according to former officials and government consultants. The focus of the plans had been a broad bombing attack, with targets including Iran's known and suspected nuclear facilities and other military and infrastructure sites. Now the emphasis is on "surgical" strikes on Revolutionary Guard Corps facilities in Tehran and elsewhere, which, the Administration claims, have been the source of attacks on Americans in Iraq. What had been presented primarily as a counter-proliferation mission has been reconceived as counterterrorism.

(snip)

At a White House meeting with Cheney this summer, according to a former senior intelligence official, it was agreed that, if limited strikes on Iran were carried out, the Administration could fend off criticism by arguing that they were a defensive action to save soldiers in Iraq. If Democrats objected, the Administration could say, "Bill Clinton did the same thing; he conducted limited strikes in Afghanistan, the Sudan, and in Baghdad to protect American lives."
The old "But...but...but... Clinton" defense. Republicans sure do love that one.
The former intelligence official added, "There is a desperate effort by Cheney et al. to bring military action to Iran as soon as possible. Meanwhile, the politicians are saying, 'You can't do it, because every Republican is going to be defeated, and we're only one fact from going over the cliff in Iraq.' But Cheney doesn't give a rat's ass about the Republican worries, and neither does the President."
Cheney and Bush don't give a rat's ass about anything except clinging to power and lining their pockets.
"They're moving everybody to the Iran desk," one recently retired C.I.A. official said. "They're dragging in a lot of analysts and ramping up everything. It's just like the fall of 2002"-the months before the invasion of Iraq, when the Iraqi Operations Group became the most important in the agency. He added, "The guys now running the Iranian program have limited direct experience with Iran. In the event of an attack, how will the Iranians react? They will react, and the Administration has not thought it all the way through."
They don't think anything through. What do they care, they're never held accountable for anything anyway. It's someone else's kids being sent halfway around the world to be killed, and to kill a bunch of poor brown people, and it's making Bush and friends tanker-loads of money. To them it's profit. To the rest of the world, it's a bad remake of a bad movie.

Shifting Targets - The Administration's plan for Iran

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
6:23 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya toasting drinks with U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon and Finland's President Tarja Halonen


Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

 

 

 Headlines & Comments

 
 True! by Daryl Cagle

See more TRUE cartoons by Daryl Cagle
 

Kansas City's own...
dubyaD40.com

Site Meter