'What can I do?' - SiCKO

Home

Columnists

Merchandise

Other Stuff

 

 Go Vote!


My site was nominated for Best Political Blog!
 

 Air America Radio

 Head-On Radio Network

 Search dubyaD40.com

Google


Search Web
Search dubyaD40.com

 Ads by The Google

 Take Action

 Advertisers

 Recent Posts

 Archives

 Today's Reason To Drink



 Want to link to us?


It's easy to do.  Right click on the image below and choose "Copy."  Then paste it on your site.


 

 
 Blogroll

 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 Today's Topics

 
Friday, August 31, 2007
Benchmarks? What benchmarks?
posted by Wally
1:00 PM

Benchmarks: Then And Now

Then
"America will hold the Iraqi government to the benchmarks it has announced."
~ Bush, January 10, 2007

"They have brought forward these benchmarks. And what the President is saying is, fine, we will judge you now less on your words and more on your performance."
~ Senior Bush Admin Official, January 10, 2007
Now
"...the standards were "designed to lock in failure."
~ internal White House memo, August 30, 2007

"A bar was set so high, that it was almost not to be able to be met."
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino, August 30, 2007

Oh, THOSE benchmarks...

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Is this why Fredo resigned? Even his own Department of Justice thinks he lied under oath
posted by Wally
8:23 AM

The Justice Department's inspector general indicated yesterday that he is investigating whether departing Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales gave false or misleading testimony to Congress, including whether he lied under oath about warrantless surveillance and the firings of nine U.S. attorneys.

The disclosure by Inspector General Glenn A. Fine in a letter to Congress signals an expansion of the department's internal investigations into Gonzales's troubled tenure, probes that were not previously known to be focused so sharply on the attorney general and his testimony.

Purjury and Obstruction of Justice

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

How's that surge working Senator?
posted by Clyde
8:10 AM

Plane carrying Shelby and Cramer fired on above Iraq

A C-130 aircraft carrying an Alabama senator and congressman was fired on this evening as it was flying from Baghdad to Amman, Jordan.

The airplane was carrying Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., and Rep. Bud Cramer, D-Huntsville, and two other senators.

Three rockets were shot at the plane and were "near misses," Shelby said in a telephone interview. He said the pilot took evasive maneuvers to avoid the rockets. The plane landed safely in Amman at about 4 p.m. central. "

I was looking out the window, a little small window, and I saw a shell or something," Shelby said. "And then I see a flare. Our plane started maneuvering and changing directions and shaking all around."

(Stay the course)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:25 AM

Use the "post a comment" link to submit your caption

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, August 30, 2007
New document reveals that the "NOT GAY" Senator from Idaho used Craigslist to find "dates"
posted by Wally
2:05 PM

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

GAO: We are not making progress in Iraq. Bush: Are too
posted by Wally
8:57 AM

Iraq has failed to meet all but three of 18 congressionally mandated benchmarks for political and military progress, according to a draft of a Government Accountability Office report. The document questions whether some aspects of a more positive assessment by the White House last month adequately reflected the range of views the GAO found within the administration.

The strikingly negative GAO draft, which will be delivered to Congress in final form on Tuesday, comes as the White House prepares to deliver its own new benchmark report in the second week of September, along with congressional testimony from Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, and Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker. They are expected to describe significant security improvements and offer at least some promise for political reconciliation in Iraq.
Of course the Bush administration denies that the GAO report is accurate, primarily because it isn't blowing glowing smoke rings up Great Leaders Bush's ass. That and the administration has a problem with the "accountability" part of the General Accountability Office.
Asked to comment on the GAO draft, White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said, "General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker are there on the ground every day in Iraq, and it's important to wait to hear what they have to say." He disputed any suggestion that the July White House assessment did not consider all internal views, noting that it resulted from "a lengthy and far-reaching process throughout the State and Defense departments and other agencies."
"Far Reaching" I'll believe. If there's one thing that the Bush administration is good at, it's "reaching" when it comes to things like "facts". Reaching up their asses mostly.
Johndroe emphasized that "while we've all seen progress in some areas, especially on the security front, it's not surprising the GAO would make this assessment, given the difficult congressionally mandated measurement they had to follow."
Oh now I get it. They're not blaming the GAO for the bad report. They're blaming Congress! Bad bad Congress, setting "standards" and "goals" and "benchmarks" so they could measure "progress". Those evil congresspeople. Don't they know they should just trust our Great Leader and everything will turn out just fabulous?

Quagmire

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

This didn't take long...
posted by Wally
8:45 AM

Tap Three Times With Your Loafer....




(Those of you too young to remember, or who weren't born yet when the original came out, I can't recommend paying to download "Knock Three Times On the Ceiling" by Tony Orlando and Dawn. Free? Sure, for a laugh. But paying for it? Maybe not so much. )

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

So NOW they want "fairness"
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:12 AM

Fuggin' hypocrites about everything. Maybe if your candidates didn't suck so bad....

Morning Shows Focus On Democrats, Conservative Watchdog Group Says

The major television network's morning news shows have devoted considerably more time to reporting on the Democratic candidates than they have on the Republican contenders, according to a conservative media watchdog group.

Morning shows on ABC, CBS and NBC devoted 284 campaign segments to Democratic candidates through the end of July, 152 to Republicans, and 81 stories on a possible independent run by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, according to the Alexandria, Va.-based Media Research Center.

.....

"There is no pretense of political balance. They are actively rooting for a Democratic victory next year, and they have the power to make a real difference," said Media Research Center founder L. Brent Bozell in a column appearing on the group's Web site.

"You've got a former first lady and a black senator fighting for the nomination," said Jim Bell, executive producer of NBC's "Today" show, according to AP. "That's historic. We're not going to make apologies for covering that."

Dumbazz

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Fuzzy Math: $50 Billion for war good, $22 Billion for education, veterans' health care and border security too expensive
posted by Wally
7:40 AM

Bush might be trying to act fiscally responsible, but he still can't do simple arithmatic. When the Democrats increased the size of his proposed budget for programs he didn't like, he held his ground (or at least his breath) and threatened to veto the bills because they were too expensive.
The president has vowed to veto eight of the 12 spending measures needed to keep the government operating. Bush opposes Democrats' efforts to add $22 billion to the $933 billion the administration is seeking for the portion of the budget that is subject to annual appropriations.

Congressional Democrats want the extra funds for education, veterans' health care and border security contained within the budgets of various federal departments and agencies.
That's mighty fiscally responsible of him, don't you think? Of course, no one should be surprised by the programs he's refusing to fund. He made it all the way to the Presidency without ever allowing himself to become educated. He needs those borders open so he has cheap labor to do the real (as opposed to photo-op) "brush-clearing" on his (ahem) ranch. And by the time the veterans need health care, they're of no use to him in his wars, so f*ck 'em. He's done with them and no longer has to care about them. There, that's $22 billion saved right there!

And what does he want to do with that savings? What else? WAR! Once again, Bush is asking for demanding another $50 Billion for his occupation of Iraq. This after the recent fight with cave-in by the Democrats on his last "supplemental blow the shiite out of Iraq" bill.
The request -- which would come on top of about $460 billion in the fiscal 2008 defense budget and $147 billion in a pending supplemental bill to fund the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq -- is expected to be announced after congressional hearings scheduled for mid-September featuring the two top U.S. officials in Iraq. Army Gen. David H. Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker will assess the state of the war and the effect of the new strategy the U.S. military has pursued this year.

The request is being prepared now in the belief that Congress will be unlikely to balk so soon after hearing the two officials argue that there are promising developments in Iraq but that they need more time to solidify the progress they have made, a congressional aide said.
In other words, Bush assumes that, like always, the Democrats will be pussies and give him everything he wants with no strings attached, no qualifications, and no direction. Here you go Mr. President. Here's your money. Do whatever you want with it, but please don't say any more mean things about us or give us angry looks." Even more pathetic, he's right. They will first talk tough and puff up their chests and say how they're going to demand this and insist on that, and then they'll give him whatever he asks for, and maybe a little more, just for good measure.

After all, they wouldn't want to balk after hearing about the "promising developments in Iraq". Oh yeah, those "promising developments" that they're going to hear about? The report that is being prepared by General Patreaus? It's actually being written by the White House.
Supporters of the war in Iraq ask that Congress and the public wait until next month before judging whether the surge in U.S. troops is raising the level of security. By Sept. 15, Gen. David Petraeus, the U.S. commander on the ground, and U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker are to report on military and political progress in Iraq.

The problem with that request, as White House spokesmen repeatedly explained to the press last week, is that there isn't going to be a report by Petraeus and Crocker to Congress and the U.S. public. The Sept. 15 report will be written by the White House staff and sent to Congress above President Bush's signature. The president's report ostensibly will take into account suggestions made by Petraeus and Crocker, but the public will not know how closely the military assessment from the war zone tracks the political imperatives of the White House.
They'll write whatever glowing, sun-shining-out-of-King-George's-asshole bullshit they can imagine, and then put Patreaus's initials on it to make it look official, and the Dems will buy it. For the full asking price of $50 Billion.

But hey, at least we're saving that $22 billion.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Pentagon Gives Up; Hands War Over to Bush
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:35 AM

The Angry Rakkasan

Pentagon won't make surge recommendation to Bush

In a sign that top commanders are divided over what course to pursue in Iraq, the Pentagon said Wednesday that it won't make a single, unified recommendation to President Bush during next month's strategy assessment, but instead will allow top commanders to make individual presentations.

"Consensus is not the goal of the process," Geoff Morrell, a Pentagon spokesman, told reporters. "If there are differences, the president will hear them."

Military analysts called the move unusual for an institution that ordinarily does not air its differences in public, especially while its troops are deployed in combat.

White said it suggests that the military commanders want to be able to distance themselves from Iraq strategy by making it clear that whatever course is followed is the president's decision, not what commanders agreed on.

.....

At the same time, Morrell made it clear that the decision rests with the president, not the military.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, August 29, 2007
Buh-Bye Larry
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
3:29 PM

Sen. Craig temporarily resigns from committee posts

Idaho Sen. Larry Craig's political support eroded significantly Wednesday when three fellow Republicans in Congress called for his resignation.

Also on Wednesday, Craig agreed to temporarily step down from his Senate committee leadership responsibilities, the GOP officials said.

The White House expressed disappointment - and no support - for the 62-year-old lawmaker, who pleaded guilty earlier this month to a charge stemming from an undercover police operation in an airport men's room.

Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Norm Coleman of Minnesota and Rep. Pete Hoekstra of Michigan all said Craig should give up his seat in Congress.

but NOT GAY!

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

He's still "not gay."
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:00 PM

Maybe not Liberace gay, but definitely Clay Aiken kinda gay.

Senator Craig defends his "I'm not gay" speech citing the "Degrees of Gayness"

In an exclusive interview with myfoxnewsonline.com , Senator Larry Craig tonight defended his stance on not being gay. Senator Craig showed up for the interview with his beard wife in tow.

Senator Craig stated that there are "degrees of gayness", and that according to these degrees, he is not gay.

When pressed for details on these "degrees of gayness", Senator Craig responded by saying:

"Well you see, there are numerous degrees of gayness, which can help you determine if you are gay or not. Let's say you're married, like me, for instance. By general decree my marriage to a female makes me not gay. The fact that I like sex with other men has nothing to do with this".

Senator Craig then went on to list the degrees of gayness:

1st degree: You're married, and Republican, but like getting sex from other men. Notice the key word from other men. If you receive oral sex from another man, or if you perform anal sex on another man, that doesn't make you gay because you're not the one sucking that dick or taking it in the ass.

2nd degree: You're married, and Republican, but like performing sex on other men. Since you're married it means you aren't gay, and besides, your wife only said she'd leave you if she caught you with another woman.

3rd degree: Here's where we draw the line at not being gay. The 3rd degree is any sexual contact with another man if you are unmarried and/or not a Republican. This makes you totally GAY!"
Satire

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Happy Anniversary
posted by Wally
9:14 AM

Two Years After Katrina - What's Been Said, and What's Been Done?

"I want to assure the folks at the state level that we are fully prepared to not only help you during the storm, but we will move in whatever resources and assets we have at our disposal after the storm to help you deal with the loss of property."
~Bush - August 28th FEMA briefing


August 30 - the day after Katrina drowned the Gulf... this is what our fearless leader was doing.

"I don't think anyone can tell you with confidence right now whether the levees will be topped or not, but that's obviously a very, very great concern."
~National Hurricane Center Director Max Mayfield - August 28, 2005

"I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees."
~Bush September 1, 2005

"Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job. The FEMA Director is working 24 -- they're working 24 hours a day. Again, my attitude is, if it's not going exactly right, we're going to make it go exactly right. If there's problems, we're going to address the problems. And that's what I've come down to assure people of."
~Bush September 2, 2005



"Tonight I also offer this pledge of the American people: Throughout the area hit by the hurricane, we will do what it takes, we will stay as long as it takes, to help citizens rebuild their communities and their lives. And all who question the future of the Crescent City need to know there is no way to imagine America without New Orleans, and this great city will rise again."
~Bush September 15, 2005 (oh, this whole speech is a beauty)

~~~ A year later ~~~

"It's a time to remember that people suffered and it's a time to recommit ourselves to helping them. But I also want people to remember that a one-year anniversary is just that, because it's going to require a long time to help these people rebuild."
~Bush August 23, 2006

~~~ Two years later ~~~



Don't be like Bush. Do Something

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Stop me if you've heard this before.....
posted by Wally
8:29 AM

Bush: We have to stop Iraqn before we see the smoking gun in the form of a mushroom cloud nukyooler holocaust.

If Bush/Cheney have their way, it's game-on in Iran. Now that things are stabilized and we've made such startling progress in Iraq (just like we did in Afghanistan before), it's apparently time to move on to the next order of business. Blowing the Shiite out of Iran.

In a speech yesterday at the VFW in Reno (again only speaking to "friendly" crowds, of course), Bush raised the stakes again with Iran.
Mr Bush said: "Iran's pursuit of technology that could lead to nuclear weapons threatens to put a region already known for instability and violence under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust.
In Iraq we were just worried about a single mushroom cloud. With Iran we have to worry about a whole "holocaust". Should we practice our "stop, drop, and roll" drills? Teach our kids to hide under the desks at school? Build bomb shelters in the back yard? Please George, your threats and accusations have become laughably predictable. Problem is, this time you're starting with "holocaust". How are you going to escalate that threat to try to sell another war to the American people and our allies? Will we soon find out that they're developing death rays? Aiming photon torpedos at our cities? Infesting our coastal waters with sharks with laser beams on their heads? Please...
"Iran's actions threaten the security of nations everywhere, and the United States is rallying friends and allies (we still have friends and allies?) to isolate Iran's regime to impose economic sanctions. We will confront this danger before it is too late."
Before the sharks learn how to aim those laser beams?
"I have authorised our military commanders in Iraq to confront Tehran's murderous activities."
There's your exit strategy. Heading east into Iran.

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

"I am not gay. I never have been gay,"
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:26 AM

Riiiiiiiight, Larry. And this site supports the Republican party.

GOP Sen. Larry Craig tells reporters 'I am not gay'

"First let me please apologize to my family, friends and staff and fellow Idahoans for the cloud placed over Idaho," he says. "I did nothing wrong at the Minneapolis airport. I did nothing wrong and regret the decision to plead guilty."

Craig blames the Idaho Statesman, his local paper, for mounting an intensive investigation into reports that the GOP lawmaker was a homosexual who trolled public restrooms for sexual partners. The paper didn't publish anything about Craig's sexual orientation until this morning, after the arrest was reported by Roll Call.

"In June, I overreacted and made a poor decision," he tells reporters. "While I was not involved in any inappropriate conduct at the Minneapolis airport or anywhere else I chose to plead guilty in the hope of making it go away."

Craig says he didn't seek counsel from his family, friends or attorney while deciding how to deal with the arrest. He has asked his attorney to review the matter and advise him on how to proceed.

How did he know about the foot tap then?

Gay.Old.Perverts.:

Mark Foley (R-FL): Resigned amid reports that he had sent sexually explicit Internet messages to at least one underage male former page.

Bob Allen (R-FL): Charged with offering to perform a sex act on an undercover male police officer.

Glenn Murphy (OH-Chairman of the Clark County Republican Party): Charged with performing an unwanted sex act on a man while he slept in a relative's Jeffersonville home.

Ted Haggard (CO-Pastor of New Life Church): Haggard admitted he had received a massage from a Denver man who claimed the prominent pastor had paid him for sex over three years.

Jeff Gannon (White House Correspondent-Gay Hooker): Has a male escort service on the side.
Honorable mention in a Republican sex scandal:

David Vitter (R-LA): Had an affair with the D.C. Madam's hookers while wearing diapers.

Randall Tobias (R-Bush appointed Global AIDS Ambassador): Same as Vitter.
I'll give the last two a break. At least they're not gay hypocrites like the others. The smartest thing a gay Republican can do right now is come out of the closet. Then there would be no issue. But when these guys vote against gay rights, civil unions, etc., THAT'S what creates the scandal.

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:26 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of the decider with some community leaders in New Orleans yesterday.


Permalink :: 6 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, August 28, 2007
Time to go Mr. Wide Stance
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
3:36 PM

Watchdog group files ethics complaint, seeks Senate investigation

A private watchdog group filed an ethics complaint against Sen. Larry Craig Tuesday following the Idaho Republican's guilty plea to misdemeanor charges stemming from complaints of lewd conduct in a men's room.

Craig arranged an afternoon appearance in Boise to address the issue. Aides said he would not answer questions.

The conservative three-term senator, who has represented Idaho in Congress for more than a quarter-century, is up for re-election next year. He hasn't said if he will run for a fourth term in 2008 and is expected to announce his plans this fall.

.....

The married Craig, 62, has faced rumors about his sexuality since the 1980s, but allegations that he has engaged in gay sex have never been substantiated. Craig has denied the assertions, which he calls ridiculous.

Can he even get it up?

Update: He says he's NOT GAY! That must mean he is.

Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

But, but, but, CLINTON!!!!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:37 PM

That didn't take long:

Romney links Craig with Bill Clinton

In his interview on CNBC's Kudlow & Company (which will air later this afternoon), Mitt Romney had some sharp words for Sen. Larry Craig, who had endorsed the former Massachusetts governor's presidential campaign and was his Idaho chairman. "Once again, we've found people in Washington have not lived up to the level of respect and dignity that we would expect for somebody that gets elected to a position of high influence. Very disappointing. He's no longer associated with my campaign, as you can imagine... I'm sorry to see that he has fallen short."

And Romney also included this jab at Bill Clinton as he continued to talk about Craig: "I think it reminds us of Mark Foley and Bill Clinton. I think it reminds us of the fact that people who are elected to public office continue to disappoint, and they somehow think that if they vote the right way on issues of significance or they can speak a good game, that we'll just forgive and forget. And the truth of the matter is, the most important thing we expect from elected--an elected official is a level of dignity and character that we can point to for our kids and our grandkids, and say, 'Hey, someday I hope you grow up and you're someone like that person.' And we've seen disappointment in the White House, we've seen it in the Senate, we've seen it in Congress. And frankly, it's disgusting."

At least he got a b.j. from a WOMAN!
Uhhhh, Mitt:

Foley is a REPUBLICAN! Craig is a REPUBLICAN! Vitter is a REPUBLICAN! Bob Allen is a REPUBLICAN! Glenn Murphy is a REPUBLICAN! Jeff Gannon is a REPUBLICAN! Pastor Ted Haggard is a REPUBLICAN!

Other than being REPUBLICAN, what do they have in common Mitt? Most of them are gay hypocrites.
Know your role and shut your mouth. You're just jealous you don't have 7 wives or little boys to f*ck.

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Chickenhawk pussy
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:13 PM

Facing a draft, Nugent bravely wet his pants

So Ted Nugent roams a concert stage while toting automatic weapons, calls Barack Obama "a piece of -----" and says he told Obama to suck on one of his machine-guns. He also calls Hillary Clinton a "worthless bitch" and Dianne Feinstein a "worthless whore."

That Nugent, he's a man's man. He talks the talk and walks the walk, right?

Except when it was time to register for the draft during the Vietnam era. By his own admission, Nugent stopped all forms of personal hygiene for a month and showed up for his draft board physical in pants caked with his own urine and feces, winning a deferment. Creative!

Ah, but that was a long time ago. Nugent isn't just a washed-up rocker -- he's a right-wing madman who's not afraid to call out some of the leading Democrats in language so vile it makes the Dixie Chick Natalie Maines' comments about President Bush sound like a love poem.

Cat Scratch Pussy

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bless you, my son!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:33 AM

Sick

U.S. Says Pope Immune From Molestation Lawsuit

The U.S. Justice Department has told a Texas court that a lawsuit accusing Pope Benedict XVI of conspiring to cover up the sexual molestation of three boys by a seminarian should be dismissed because the pontiff enjoys immunity as head of state of the Holy See.

Assistant U.S. Attorney General Peter Keisler said in Monday's filing that allowing the lawsuit to proceed would be "incompatible with the United States' foreign policy interests."

There was no immediate ruling from Judge Lee Rosenthal of the U.S. District Court for the southern district of Texas in Houston. However, U.S. courts have been bound by such "suggestion of immunity" motions submitted by the government, Keisler's filing says.

A 1994 lawsuit against Pope John Paul II (search), also filed in Texas, was dismissed after the U.S. government filed a similar motion.

Values

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

What is it with homophobic Republicans and men's bathrooms?
posted by Wally
6:36 AM

Maybe they want to be like Superman?

Like Clark Kent slipping into a phone booth and donning red tights to secretly become Superman, Republican politicians have been slipping into men's rooms and secretly becoming pole-smoking perverts. Not that there's anything wrong with being a pole-smoker, or pervert. But when you make a career of vilifying and demonizing gays, and then you're found in the closet (or bathroom stall) with something other than your foot in your mouth, well.... It's not what you put into your mouth that's the problem. It's what has been coming out of your mouth all these years.

Just last month, we saw Florida Republican Bob Allen, who had "recently sponsored a bill to crack down on soliciting sex in public parks.", arrested for soliciting sex in a public park. Before that we had Mark Foley hitting on male pages. And of course who can forget Jeff Guckert - the gay male prostitute who managed somehow to slip into the White House press corp repeatedly - sitting a few feet from the President himself, using a false name and false credentials (makes you wonder who he was blowing to get that gig?)

This time it's Idaho Senator Larry Craig - you can guess which party - who was busted in June in a Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport men's room trying to solicit sexual favors from an undercover police officer.
According to the incident report, Sgt. Dave Karsnia was working as a plainclothes officer on June 11 investigating civilian complaints regarding sexual activity in the men's public restroom in which Craig was arrested.

Karsnia entered the bathroom at noon that day and about 13 minutes after taking a seat in a stall, he stated he could see "an older white male with grey hair standing outside my stall."

"I could see Craig look through the crack in the door from his position. Craig would look down at his hands, 'fidget' with his fingers, and then look through the crack into my stall again. Craig would repeat this cycle for about two minutes," the report states.

Craig then entered the stall next to Karsnia's and placed his roller bag against the front of the stall door.

"At 1216 hours, Craig tapped his right foot. I recognized this as a signal used by persons wishing to engage in lewd conduct. Craig tapped his toes several times and moves his foot closer to my foot. I moved my foot up and down slowly. While this was occurring, the male in the stall to my right was still present. I could hear several unknown persons in the restroom that appeared to use the restroom for its intended use. The presence of others did not seem to deter Craig as he moved his right foot so that it touched the side of my left foot which was within my stall area," the report states.

Craig then proceeded to swipe his hand under the stall divider several times, and Karsnia noted in his report that "I could ... see Craig had a gold ring on his ring finger as his hand was on my side of the stall divider."
Craig called the incident a "misunderstanding. Sure Senator, of course it was a misunderstanding. That's why you plead guilty to the charge.

What makes the case funnier is when you look at Craig's voting record:
Voted YES on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. (Jun 2006)
Voted NO on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes. (Jun 2002)
Voted NO on expanding hate crimes to include sexual orientation. (Jun 2000)
Voted YES on prohibiting same-sex marriage. (Sep 1996)
Voted NO on prohibiting job discrimination by sexual orientation. (Sep 1996)
Well Larry, I guess you can't complain when you're fired from Congress for your sexual orientation then, can you?

Oh, and about that Clinton/Monica thing? Remember back on January 24, 1999, on Meet The Press, when you said:
Well, I don't know where the Senate's going to be on that issue of an up or down vote on impeachment, but I will tell you that the Senate certainly can bring about a censure resolution and it's a slap on the wrist. It's a, "Bad boy, Bill Clinton. You're a naughty boy." The American people already know that Bill Clinton is a bad boy, a naughty boy.

I'm going to speak out for the citizens of my state, who in the majority think that Bill Clinton is probably even a nasty, bad, naughty boy. The question issue now is simply this: Did he lie under oath? Did he perjure himself and did he obstruct justice? And that's where we're trying to go now in this truth-seeking process.
You were talking about impeaching him for what? Being a naughty boy? If he was a "naughty boy" for what he did, what does that make you? You talk about "lying under oath and obstruction of justice" and yet you were vocally and vehemently outraged when the exact same charges were levelled against your guy Scooter Libby? Republicans wonder why they keep getting accused of hypocrisy?

I don't care if you're gay, or a pervert, or hiding in your wife's closet, or what you do in your spare time among consenting adults. But when you berate, degrade, and discriminate against others for the exact same thing you are guilty of doing, it makes you a hypocrite and a liar and unfit for public office. STFU, pack your shit (oh yeah, that's already been done, hasn't it?), and go home you flaming hypocrite.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, August 27, 2007
Just can't stop watching...
posted by Wally
2:04 PM

As much as these two men have damaged our nation, as much of an embarrassment as they both are, I can't stop watching. It's like a train-wreck in slow motion. This time the train is the Bush presidency...

Gonzo Resigns...



Bush whines...



The power of this administration declines...

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Who will replace Fredo?
posted by Wally
9:14 AM

Alberto Gonzales has officially announced his resignation, making the following statement - one that is as moving, insigtful, and thought provoking as one would expect from a man of Fredo's stature and intellect.
Good morning.

Thirteen years ago I entered public service to make a positive difference in the lives of others. And during this time I have traveled a remarkable journey, from my home state of Texas to Washington, D.C., supported by the unwavering love and encouragement of my wife Rebecca and our sons Jared, Graham and Gabriel.

Yesterday I met with President Bush and informed him of my decision to conclude my government service as attorney general of the United States effective as of September 17th, 2007.

Let me say that it's been one of my greatest privileges to lead the Department of Justice. I have great admiration and respect for the men and women who work here. I have made a point as attorney general to personally meet as many of them as possible, and today I want to again thank them for their service to our nation.

It is through their continued work that our country and our communities remain safe, that the rights and civil liberties of our citizens are protected, and the hopes and dreams of all of our children are secured.

I often remind our fellow citizens that we live in the greatest country in the world and that I have lived the American dream. Even my worst days as Attorney General have been better than my father's best days.

Public service is honorable and noble. And I am profoundly grateful to President Bush for his friendship and for the many opportunities he has given me to serve the American people.

Thank you, and God bless America.
Yup, that was it. Fortunately, it was short enough where 1) you probably didn't fall asleep and 2) you didn't have time to get annoyed or offended at the lies, arrogance, and stupidity of this man to hurl anything heavy at the TV (or in this case, monitor).

Now that he's gone, rumors are swirling about who will be the next Attorney General. Speculation centers around this man:


That's Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff, not Skeletor - though I understand the confusion. But I have a much better suggestion:


Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Gonzales Resigns as Attorney General
posted by Wally
6:29 AM

Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, whose tenure has been marred by controversy and accusations of perjury before Congress, has resigned. A senior administration official said he would announce the decision later this morning in Washington.

Mr. Gonzales, who had rebuffed calls for his resignation, submitted his to President Bush by telephone on Friday, the official said. His decision was not immediately announced, the official added, until after the president invited him and his wife to lunch at his ranch near here.

Mr. Bush has not yet chosen a replacement but will not leave the position open long, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the Attorney General's resignation had not yet been made public.
Time for Harry Reid to call in that "emergency session" of the Senate, because I don't even want to think of who Bush will replace Fredo with if he is allowed a "recess appointment".

Meantime... if you were looking for a reason to celebrate....



...And STAY out!!

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:19 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Bush at the microphones.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, August 26, 2007
Progress in Iraq is getting progressively worse
posted by Clyde
5:26 AM

Iraq Body Count Running at Double Pace

This year's U.S. troop buildup has succeeded in bringing violence in Baghdad down from peak levels, but the death toll from sectarian attacks around the country is running nearly double the pace from a year ago.

Some of the recent bloodshed appears the result of militant fighters drifting into parts of northern Iraq, where they have fled after U.S.-led offensives. Baghdad, however, still accounts for slightly more than half of all war-related killings -- the same percentage as a year ago, according to figures compiled by The Associated Press.

The tallies and trends offer a sobering snapshot after an additional 30,000 U.S. troops began campaigns in February to regain control of the Baghdad area. It also highlights one of the major themes expected in next month's Iraq progress report to Congress: some military headway, but extremist factions are far from broken.

(link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Telling the truth has consequences
posted by Clyde
5:11 AM

Iraq Whistleblowers Vilified, Demoted
Those Who Speak Out Against Corruption In Iraq Reconstruction Say U.S. Gov't Treats Them Like Criminals

One after another, the men and women who have stepped forward to report corruption in the massive effort to rebuild Iraq have been vilified, fired and demoted.

Or worse.

For daring to report illegal arms sales, Navy veteran Donald Vance says he was imprisoned by the American military in a security compound outside Baghdad and subjected to harsh interrogation methods.

There were times, huddled on the floor in solitary confinement with that head-banging music blaring dawn to dusk and interrogators yelling the same questions over and over, that Vance began to wish he had just kept his mouth shut.

(link)

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, August 25, 2007
We losing our privacy for this?
posted by Clyde
5:11 AM

Terror Suspect List Yields Few Arrests

The government's terrorist screening database flagged Americans and foreigners as suspected terrorists almost 20,000 times last year. But only a small fraction of those questioned were arrested or denied entry into the United States, raising concerns among critics about privacy and the list's effectiveness.

A range of state, local and federal agencies as well as U.S. embassies overseas rely on the database to pinpoint terrorism suspects, who can be identified at borders or even during routine traffic stops. The database consolidates a dozen government watch lists, as well as a growing amount of information from various sources, including airline passenger data. The government said it was planning to expand the data-sharing to private-sector groups with a "substantial bearing on homeland security," though officials would not be more specific.

Few specifics are known about how the system operates, how many people are detained or turned back from borders, or the criteria used to identify suspects. The government will not discuss cases, nor will it confirm whether an individual's name is on its list.

(Big Brother)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Booming economy alert - Major lenders close too collapse
posted by Clyde
4:56 AM

Fed bends rules to help two big banks

In a clear sign that the credit crunch is still affecting the nation's largest financial institutions, the Federal Reserve agreed this week to bend key banking regulations to help out Citigroup and Bank of America according to documents posted Friday on the Fed's web site.

The Aug. 20 letters from the Fed to Citigroup and Bank of America state that the Fed, which regulates large parts of the U.S. financial system, has agreed to exempt both banks from rules that effectively limit the amount of lending that their federally-insured banks can do with their brokerage affiliates. The exemption, which is temporary, means, for example, that Citigroup's Citibank entity can substantially increase funding to Citigroup Global Markets, its brokerage subsidiary. Citigroup and Bank of America requested the exemptions, according to the letters, to provide liquidity to those holding mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, and other securities.

This unusual move by the Fed shows that the largest Wall Street firms are continuing to have problems funding operations during the current market difficulties, according to banking industry skeptics. The Fed's move appears to support the view that even the biggest brokerages have been caught off guard by the credit crunch and don't have financing to deal with the resulting dislocation in the markets. The opposing, less negative view is that the Fed has taken this step merely to increase the speed with which the funds recently borrowed at the Fed's discount window can flow through to the bond markets, where the mortgage mess has caused a drying up of liquidity.

(Corporate Welfare anyone?)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, August 24, 2007
iRan
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:35 PM

US 'poised to strike Iran'

Bob Baer, the former Middle East CIA operative whose first book about his life inspired the oil-and-espionage thriller Syriana, is working on a new book on Iran, but says he was told by senior intelligence officials that he had better get it published in the next couple of months because things could be about to change.

Baer, in an interview with The Weekend Australian, says his contacts in the administration suggest a strategic airstrike on Iran is a real possibility in the months ahead.

Washington's intelligence community is abuzz about possible military action against Iran, which is being weighed at the highest levels of the Bush administration. While the guessing game has become "will they or won't they?", at least some experienced and trusted intelligence sources have told The Weekend Australian that the possibility of a strike in the next 12 months remains remote.

.....

A case for a strike became more prominent last week when The New York Times reported the Bush administration was preparing to declare the Revolutionary Guard Corps a foreign terrorist organisation.

"If imposed, the declaration would signal a more confrontational turn in the administration's approach to Iran and would be the first time that the United States has added the armed forces of any sovereign government to its list of terrorist organisations," the Times reported.

The Revolutionary Guard is said to be the largest branch of Iran's military.

Exit Strategy

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Somewhere in the Massachusetts countryside...
posted by Wally
9:34 AM

...someone had a message for anyone flying overhead.

The hell with crop circles, this guy had something more important to mow into his field. This was found on Google Earth. Run your mouse over the image to see the "zoomed in" version.

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Cut and Run Republicans? Or Just Flip-Floppers?
posted by Wally
6:53 AM

Key Republican Senator Calls For Troop Withdrawal From Iraq
An influential U.S. Senate Republican says President Bush should announce an initial withdrawal of troops from Iraq on September 15. Senator John Warner of Virginia made his comments to reporters Thursday, just days after visiting Iraq.

Senator Warner, a member and former chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, says he is recommending that President Bush announce the beginning of a troop withdrawal from Iraq on September 15 as a way to press the Iraqi government into taking steps toward political reconciliation.

"Take into consideration the need to send a sharp and clear message throughout the region, to the United States, and one that people can understand; I think [there is] no clearer form of that than for the president to announce on the 15th, that in consultation with senior military commanders, he has decided to initiate the first step in a withdrawal of our forces," said Senator Warner.

Voice of America

Permalink :: 0 comments ::