|
Air
America Radio |
 |
|
|
|
|
Head-On
Radio Network |
 |
|
|
|
|
Search
dubyaD40.com |
 |
|
|
|
|
Ads by
The Google |
 |
|
|
|
Take
Action |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recent
Posts |
 |
|
|
|
|
Archives |
 |
|
|
|
|
Today's
Reason To Drink |
 |
|
|
|
|
Want to
link to us? |
 |
It's easy to do. Right click on the image
below and choose "Copy." Then paste it on
your site.

|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Today's
Topics |
 |
| |
|
Friday, August 31, 2007
|
Benchmarks? What benchmarks?
posted by
Wally
1:00 PM
Benchmarks: Then And Now
Then"America will hold the Iraqi government to the benchmarks it has announced." ~ Bush, January 10, 2007
"They have brought forward these benchmarks. And what the President is saying is, fine, we will judge you now less on your words and more on your performance." ~ Senior Bush Admin Official, January 10, 2007 Now"...the standards were "designed to lock in failure." ~ internal White House memo, August 30, 2007
"A bar was set so high, that it was almost not to be able to be met." White House Press Secretary Dana Perino, August 30, 2007 Oh, THOSE benchmarks...
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Is this why Fredo resigned? Even his own Department of Justice thinks he lied under oath
posted by
Wally
8:23 AM
The Justice Department's inspector general indicated yesterday that he is investigating whether departing Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales gave false or misleading testimony to Congress, including whether he lied under oath about warrantless surveillance and the firings of nine U.S. attorneys.
The disclosure by Inspector General Glenn A. Fine in a letter to Congress signals an expansion of the department's internal investigations into Gonzales's troubled tenure, probes that were not previously known to be focused so sharply on the attorney general and his testimony.
Purjury and Obstruction of Justice
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
How's that surge working Senator?
posted by
Clyde
8:10 AM
Plane carrying Shelby and Cramer fired on above Iraq
A C-130 aircraft carrying an Alabama senator and congressman was fired on this evening as it was flying from Baghdad to Amman, Jordan.
The airplane was carrying Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., and Rep. Bud Cramer, D-Huntsville, and two other senators.
Three rockets were shot at the plane and were "near misses," Shelby said in a telephone interview. He said the pilot took evasive maneuvers to avoid the rockets. The plane landed safely in Amman at about 4 p.m. central. "
I was looking out the window, a little small window, and I saw a shell or something," Shelby said. "And then I see a flare. Our plane started maneuvering and changing directions and shaking all around."
(Stay the course)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:25 AM
Use the "post a comment" link to submit your caption

Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
|
Thursday, August 30, 2007
|
New document reveals that the "NOT GAY" Senator from Idaho used Craigslist to find "dates"
posted by
Wally
2:05 PM

Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
GAO: We are not making progress in Iraq. Bush: Are too
posted by
Wally
8:57 AM
Iraq has failed to meet all but three of 18 congressionally mandated benchmarks for political and military progress, according to a draft of a Government Accountability Office report. The document questions whether some aspects of a more positive assessment by the White House last month adequately reflected the range of views the GAO found within the administration.
The strikingly negative GAO draft, which will be delivered to Congress in final form on Tuesday, comes as the White House prepares to deliver its own new benchmark report in the second week of September, along with congressional testimony from Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, and Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker. They are expected to describe significant security improvements and offer at least some promise for political reconciliation in Iraq. Of course the Bush administration denies that the GAO report is accurate, primarily because it isn't blowing glowing smoke rings up Great Leaders Bush's ass. That and the administration has a problem with the "accountability" part of the General Accountability Office.Asked to comment on the GAO draft, White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said, "General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker are there on the ground every day in Iraq, and it's important to wait to hear what they have to say." He disputed any suggestion that the July White House assessment did not consider all internal views, noting that it resulted from "a lengthy and far-reaching process throughout the State and Defense departments and other agencies." "Far Reaching" I'll believe. If there's one thing that the Bush administration is good at, it's "reaching" when it comes to things like "facts". Reaching up their asses mostly.Johndroe emphasized that "while we've all seen progress in some areas, especially on the security front, it's not surprising the GAO would make this assessment, given the difficult congressionally mandated measurement they had to follow." Oh now I get it. They're not blaming the GAO for the bad report. They're blaming Congress! Bad bad Congress, setting "standards" and "goals" and "benchmarks" so they could measure "progress". Those evil congresspeople. Don't they know they should just trust our Great Leader and everything will turn out just fabulous?
Quagmire
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
This didn't take long...
posted by
Wally
8:45 AM
Tap Three Times With Your Loafer....
(Those of you too young to remember, or who weren't born yet when the original came out, I can't recommend paying to download "Knock Three Times On the Ceiling" by Tony Orlando and Dawn. Free? Sure, for a laugh. But paying for it? Maybe not so much. )
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
So NOW they want "fairness"
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:12 AM
Fuggin' hypocrites about everything. Maybe if your candidates didn't suck so bad....
Morning Shows Focus On Democrats, Conservative Watchdog Group Says

The major television network's morning news shows have devoted considerably more time to reporting on the Democratic candidates than they have on the Republican contenders, according to a conservative media watchdog group.
Morning shows on ABC, CBS and NBC devoted 284 campaign segments to Democratic candidates through the end of July, 152 to Republicans, and 81 stories on a possible independent run by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, according to the Alexandria, Va.-based Media Research Center.
.....
"There is no pretense of political balance. They are actively rooting for a Democratic victory next year, and they have the power to make a real difference," said Media Research Center founder L. Brent Bozell in a column appearing on the group's Web site.
"You've got a former first lady and a black senator fighting for the nomination," said Jim Bell, executive producer of NBC's "Today" show, according to AP. "That's historic. We're not going to make apologies for covering that."
Dumbazz
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Fuzzy Math: $50 Billion for war good, $22 Billion for education, veterans' health care and border security too expensive
posted by
Wally
7:40 AM
Bush might be trying to act fiscally responsible, but he still can't do simple arithmatic. When the Democrats increased the size of his proposed budget for programs he didn't like, he held his ground (or at least his breath) and threatened to veto the bills because they were too expensive.The president has vowed to veto eight of the 12 spending measures needed to keep the government operating. Bush opposes Democrats' efforts to add $22 billion to the $933 billion the administration is seeking for the portion of the budget that is subject to annual appropriations.
Congressional Democrats want the extra funds for education, veterans' health care and border security contained within the budgets of various federal departments and agencies. That's mighty fiscally responsible of him, don't you think? Of course, no one should be surprised by the programs he's refusing to fund. He made it all the way to the Presidency without ever allowing himself to become educated. He needs those borders open so he has cheap labor to do the real (as opposed to photo-op) "brush-clearing" on his (ahem) ranch. And by the time the veterans need health care, they're of no use to him in his wars, so f*ck 'em. He's done with them and no longer has to care about them. There, that's $22 billion saved right there!
And what does he want to do with that savings? What else? WAR! Once again, Bush is asking for demanding another $50 Billion for his occupation of Iraq. This after the recent fight with cave-in by the Democrats on his last "supplemental blow the shiite out of Iraq" bill.The request -- which would come on top of about $460 billion in the fiscal 2008 defense budget and $147 billion in a pending supplemental bill to fund the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq -- is expected to be announced after congressional hearings scheduled for mid-September featuring the two top U.S. officials in Iraq. Army Gen. David H. Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker will assess the state of the war and the effect of the new strategy the U.S. military has pursued this year.
The request is being prepared now in the belief that Congress will be unlikely to balk so soon after hearing the two officials argue that there are promising developments in Iraq but that they need more time to solidify the progress they have made, a congressional aide said. In other words, Bush assumes that, like always, the Democrats will be pussies and give him everything he wants with no strings attached, no qualifications, and no direction. Here you go Mr. President. Here's your money. Do whatever you want with it, but please don't say any more mean things about us or give us angry looks." Even more pathetic, he's right. They will first talk tough and puff up their chests and say how they're going to demand this and insist on that, and then they'll give him whatever he asks for, and maybe a little more, just for good measure.
After all, they wouldn't want to balk after hearing about the "promising developments in Iraq". Oh yeah, those "promising developments" that they're going to hear about? The report that is being prepared by General Patreaus? It's actually being written by the White House.Supporters of the war in Iraq ask that Congress and the public wait until next month before judging whether the surge in U.S. troops is raising the level of security. By Sept. 15, Gen. David Petraeus, the U.S. commander on the ground, and U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker are to report on military and political progress in Iraq.
The problem with that request, as White House spokesmen repeatedly explained to the press last week, is that there isn't going to be a report by Petraeus and Crocker to Congress and the U.S. public. The Sept. 15 report will be written by the White House staff and sent to Congress above President Bush's signature. The president's report ostensibly will take into account suggestions made by Petraeus and Crocker, but the public will not know how closely the military assessment from the war zone tracks the political imperatives of the White House. They'll write whatever glowing, sun-shining-out-of-King-George's-asshole bullshit they can imagine, and then put Patreaus's initials on it to make it look official, and the Dems will buy it. For the full asking price of $50 Billion.
But hey, at least we're saving that $22 billion.
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Pentagon Gives Up; Hands War Over to Bush
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:35 AM
The Angry Rakkasan
Pentagon won't make surge recommendation to Bush
In a sign that top commanders are divided over what course to pursue in Iraq, the Pentagon said Wednesday that it won't make a single, unified recommendation to President Bush during next month's strategy assessment, but instead will allow top commanders to make individual presentations.
"Consensus is not the goal of the process," Geoff Morrell, a Pentagon spokesman, told reporters. "If there are differences, the president will hear them."
Military analysts called the move unusual for an institution that ordinarily does not air its differences in public, especially while its troops are deployed in combat.
White said it suggests that the military commanders want to be able to distance themselves from Iraq strategy by making it clear that whatever course is followed is the president's decision, not what commanders agreed on.
.....
At the same time, Morrell made it clear that the decision rests with the president, not the military.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
|
Buh-Bye Larry
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
3:29 PM
Sen. Craig temporarily resigns from committee posts

Idaho Sen. Larry Craig's political support eroded significantly Wednesday when three fellow Republicans in Congress called for his resignation.
Also on Wednesday, Craig agreed to temporarily step down from his Senate committee leadership responsibilities, the GOP officials said.
The White House expressed disappointment - and no support - for the 62-year-old lawmaker, who pleaded guilty earlier this month to a charge stemming from an undercover police operation in an airport men's room.
Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Norm Coleman of Minnesota and Rep. Pete Hoekstra of Michigan all said Craig should give up his seat in Congress.
but NOT GAY!
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
He's still "not gay."
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
2:00 PM
Maybe not Liberace gay, but definitely Clay Aiken kinda gay.
Senator Craig defends his "I'm not gay" speech citing the "Degrees of Gayness"

In an exclusive interview with myfoxnewsonline.com , Senator Larry Craig tonight defended his stance on not being gay. Senator Craig showed up for the interview with his beard wife in tow.
Senator Craig stated that there are "degrees of gayness", and that according to these degrees, he is not gay.
When pressed for details on these "degrees of gayness", Senator Craig responded by saying:
"Well you see, there are numerous degrees of gayness, which can help you determine if you are gay or not. Let's say you're married, like me, for instance. By general decree my marriage to a female makes me not gay. The fact that I like sex with other men has nothing to do with this".
Senator Craig then went on to list the degrees of gayness:
1st degree: You're married, and Republican, but like getting sex from other men. Notice the key word from other men. If you receive oral sex from another man, or if you perform anal sex on another man, that doesn't make you gay because you're not the one sucking that dick or taking it in the ass.
2nd degree: You're married, and Republican, but like performing sex on other men. Since you're married it means you aren't gay, and besides, your wife only said she'd leave you if she caught you with another woman.
3rd degree: Here's where we draw the line at not being gay. The 3rd degree is any sexual contact with another man if you are unmarried and/or not a Republican. This makes you totally GAY!" Satire
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Happy Anniversary
posted by
Wally
9:14 AM
Two Years After Katrina - What's Been Said, and What's Been Done?
"I want to assure the folks at the state level that we are fully prepared to not only help you during the storm, but we will move in whatever resources and assets we have at our disposal after the storm to help you deal with the loss of property." ~Bush - August 28th FEMA briefing
 August 30 - the day after Katrina drowned the Gulf... this is what our fearless leader was doing. "I don't think anyone can tell you with confidence right now whether the levees will be topped or not, but that's obviously a very, very great concern." ~National Hurricane Center Director Max Mayfield - August 28, 2005
"I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees." ~Bush September 1, 2005
"Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job. The FEMA Director is working 24 -- they're working 24 hours a day. Again, my attitude is, if it's not going exactly right, we're going to make it go exactly right. If there's problems, we're going to address the problems. And that's what I've come down to assure people of." ~Bush September 2, 2005

"Tonight I also offer this pledge of the American people: Throughout the area hit by the hurricane, we will do what it takes, we will stay as long as it takes, to help citizens rebuild their communities and their lives. And all who question the future of the Crescent City need to know there is no way to imagine America without New Orleans, and this great city will rise again." ~Bush September 15, 2005 (oh, this whole speech is a beauty)
~~~ A year later ~~~
"It's a time to remember that people suffered and it's a time to recommit ourselves to helping them. But I also want people to remember that a one-year anniversary is just that, because it's going to require a long time to help these people rebuild." ~Bush August 23, 2006
~~~ Two years later ~~~
Don't be like Bush. Do Something
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Stop me if you've heard this before.....
posted by
Wally
8:29 AM
Bush: We have to stop Iraqn before we see the smoking gun in the form of a mushroom cloud nukyooler holocaust.
If Bush/Cheney have their way, it's game-on in Iran. Now that things are stabilized and we've made such startling progress in Iraq (just like we did in Afghanistan before), it's apparently time to move on to the next order of business. Blowing the Shiite out of Iran.
In a speech yesterday at the VFW in Reno (again only speaking to "friendly" crowds, of course), Bush raised the stakes again with Iran. Mr Bush said: "Iran's pursuit of technology that could lead to nuclear weapons threatens to put a region already known for instability and violence under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust. In Iraq we were just worried about a single mushroom cloud. With Iran we have to worry about a whole "holocaust". Should we practice our "stop, drop, and roll" drills? Teach our kids to hide under the desks at school? Build bomb shelters in the back yard? Please George, your threats and accusations have become laughably predictable. Problem is, this time you're starting with "holocaust". How are you going to escalate that threat to try to sell another war to the American people and our allies? Will we soon find out that they're developing death rays? Aiming photon torpedos at our cities? Infesting our coastal waters with sharks with laser beams on their heads? Please... "Iran's actions threaten the security of nations everywhere, and the United States is rallying friends and allies (we still have friends and allies?) to isolate Iran's regime to impose economic sanctions. We will confront this danger before it is too late." Before the sharks learn how to aim those laser beams? "I have authorised our military commanders in Iraq to confront Tehran's murderous activities." There's your exit strategy. Heading east into Iran.
Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
"I am not gay. I never have been gay,"
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:26 AM
Riiiiiiiight, Larry. And this site supports the Republican party.
GOP Sen. Larry Craig tells reporters 'I am not gay'
"First let me please apologize to my family, friends and staff and fellow Idahoans for the cloud placed over Idaho," he says. "I did nothing wrong at the Minneapolis airport. I did nothing wrong and regret the decision to plead guilty."
Craig blames the Idaho Statesman, his local paper, for mounting an intensive investigation into reports that the GOP lawmaker was a homosexual who trolled public restrooms for sexual partners. The paper didn't publish anything about Craig's sexual orientation until this morning, after the arrest was reported by Roll Call.
"In June, I overreacted and made a poor decision," he tells reporters. "While I was not involved in any inappropriate conduct at the Minneapolis airport or anywhere else I chose to plead guilty in the hope of making it go away."
Craig says he didn't seek counsel from his family, friends or attorney while deciding how to deal with the arrest. He has asked his attorney to review the matter and advise him on how to proceed.
How did he know about the foot tap then?  Gay.Old.Perverts.:
Mark Foley (R-FL): Resigned amid reports that he had sent sexually explicit Internet messages to at least one underage male former page.
Bob Allen (R-FL): Charged with offering to perform a sex act on an undercover male police officer.
Glenn Murphy (OH-Chairman of the Clark County Republican Party): Charged with performing an unwanted sex act on a man while he slept in a relative's Jeffersonville home.
Ted Haggard (CO-Pastor of New Life Church): Haggard admitted he had received a massage from a Denver man who claimed the prominent pastor had paid him for sex over three years.
Jeff Gannon (White House Correspondent-Gay Hooker): Has a male escort service on the side. Honorable mention in a Republican sex scandal:
David Vitter (R-LA): Had an affair with the D.C. Madam's hookers while wearing diapers.
Randall Tobias (R-Bush appointed Global AIDS Ambassador): Same as Vitter. I'll give the last two a break. At least they're not gay hypocrites like the others. The smartest thing a gay Republican can do right now is come out of the closet. Then there would be no issue. But when these guys vote against gay rights, civil unions, etc., THAT'S what creates the scandal.
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:26 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of the decider with some community leaders in New Orleans yesterday.

Permalink
::
6 comments
::
|
|
|
Tuesday, August 28, 2007
|
Time to go Mr. Wide Stance
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
3:36 PM
Watchdog group files ethics complaint, seeks Senate investigation 
A private watchdog group filed an ethics complaint against Sen. Larry Craig Tuesday following the Idaho Republican's guilty plea to misdemeanor charges stemming from complaints of lewd conduct in a men's room.
Craig arranged an afternoon appearance in Boise to address the issue. Aides said he would not answer questions.
The conservative three-term senator, who has represented Idaho in Congress for more than a quarter-century, is up for re-election next year. He hasn't said if he will run for a fourth term in 2008 and is expected to announce his plans this fall.
.....
The married Craig, 62, has faced rumors about his sexuality since the 1980s, but allegations that he has engaged in gay sex have never been substantiated. Craig has denied the assertions, which he calls ridiculous.
Can he even get it up?  Update: He says he's NOT GAY! That must mean he is.
Permalink
::
5 comments
::
|
|
But, but, but, CLINTON!!!!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
2:37 PM
That didn't take long:
Romney links Craig with Bill Clinton
In his interview on CNBC's Kudlow & Company (which will air later this afternoon), Mitt Romney had some sharp words for Sen. Larry Craig, who had endorsed the former Massachusetts governor's presidential campaign and was his Idaho chairman. "Once again, we've found people in Washington have not lived up to the level of respect and dignity that we would expect for somebody that gets elected to a position of high influence. Very disappointing. He's no longer associated with my campaign, as you can imagine... I'm sorry to see that he has fallen short."
And Romney also included this jab at Bill Clinton as he continued to talk about Craig: "I think it reminds us of Mark Foley and Bill Clinton. I think it reminds us of the fact that people who are elected to public office continue to disappoint, and they somehow think that if they vote the right way on issues of significance or they can speak a good game, that we'll just forgive and forget. And the truth of the matter is, the most important thing we expect from elected--an elected official is a level of dignity and character that we can point to for our kids and our grandkids, and say, 'Hey, someday I hope you grow up and you're someone like that person.' And we've seen disappointment in the White House, we've seen it in the Senate, we've seen it in Congress. And frankly, it's disgusting."
At least he got a b.j. from a WOMAN! Uhhhh, Mitt:
Foley is a REPUBLICAN! Craig is a REPUBLICAN! Vitter is a REPUBLICAN! Bob Allen is a REPUBLICAN! Glenn Murphy is a REPUBLICAN! Jeff Gannon is a REPUBLICAN! Pastor Ted Haggard is a REPUBLICAN!
Other than being REPUBLICAN, what do they have in common Mitt? Most of them are gay hypocrites. Know your role and shut your mouth. You're just jealous you don't have 7 wives or little boys to f*ck.
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Chickenhawk pussy
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
2:13 PM
Facing a draft, Nugent bravely wet his pants

So Ted Nugent roams a concert stage while toting automatic weapons, calls Barack Obama "a piece of -----" and says he told Obama to suck on one of his machine-guns. He also calls Hillary Clinton a "worthless bitch" and Dianne Feinstein a "worthless whore."
That Nugent, he's a man's man. He talks the talk and walks the walk, right?
Except when it was time to register for the draft during the Vietnam era. By his own admission, Nugent stopped all forms of personal hygiene for a month and showed up for his draft board physical in pants caked with his own urine and feces, winning a deferment. Creative!
Ah, but that was a long time ago. Nugent isn't just a washed-up rocker -- he's a right-wing madman who's not afraid to call out some of the leading Democrats in language so vile it makes the Dixie Chick Natalie Maines' comments about President Bush sound like a love poem.
Cat Scratch Pussy
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Bless you, my son!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:33 AM
Sick
U.S. Says Pope Immune From Molestation Lawsuit

The U.S. Justice Department has told a Texas court that a lawsuit accusing Pope Benedict XVI of conspiring to cover up the sexual molestation of three boys by a seminarian should be dismissed because the pontiff enjoys immunity as head of state of the Holy See.
Assistant U.S. Attorney General Peter Keisler said in Monday's filing that allowing the lawsuit to proceed would be "incompatible with the United States' foreign policy interests."
There was no immediate ruling from Judge Lee Rosenthal of the U.S. District Court for the southern district of Texas in Houston. However, U.S. courts have been bound by such "suggestion of immunity" motions submitted by the government, Keisler's filing says.
A 1994 lawsuit against Pope John Paul II (search), also filed in Texas, was dismissed after the U.S. government filed a similar motion.
Values
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
What is it with homophobic Republicans and men's bathrooms?
posted by
Wally
6:36 AM
Maybe they want to be like Superman?
Like Clark Kent slipping into a phone booth and donning red tights to secretly become Superman, Republican politicians have been slipping into men's rooms and secretly becoming pole-smoking perverts. Not that there's anything wrong with being a pole-smoker, or pervert. But when you make a career of vilifying and demonizing gays, and then you're found in the closet (or bathroom stall) with something other than your foot in your mouth, well.... It's not what you put into your mouth that's the problem. It's what has been coming out of your mouth all these years.
Just last month, we saw Florida Republican Bob Allen, who had "recently sponsored a bill to crack down on soliciting sex in public parks.", arrested for soliciting sex in a public park. Before that we had Mark Foley hitting on male pages. And of course who can forget Jeff Guckert - the gay male prostitute who managed somehow to slip into the White House press corp repeatedly - sitting a few feet from the President himself, using a false name and false credentials (makes you wonder who he was blowing to get that gig?)
This time it's Idaho Senator Larry Craig - you can guess which party - who was busted in June in a Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport men's room trying to solicit sexual favors from an undercover police officer. According to the incident report, Sgt. Dave Karsnia was working as a plainclothes officer on June 11 investigating civilian complaints regarding sexual activity in the men's public restroom in which Craig was arrested.
Karsnia entered the bathroom at noon that day and about 13 minutes after taking a seat in a stall, he stated he could see "an older white male with grey hair standing outside my stall."
"I could see Craig look through the crack in the door from his position. Craig would look down at his hands, 'fidget' with his fingers, and then look through the crack into my stall again. Craig would repeat this cycle for about two minutes," the report states.
Craig then entered the stall next to Karsnia's and placed his roller bag against the front of the stall door.
"At 1216 hours, Craig tapped his right foot. I recognized this as a signal used by persons wishing to engage in lewd conduct. Craig tapped his toes several times and moves his foot closer to my foot. I moved my foot up and down slowly. While this was occurring, the male in the stall to my right was still present. I could hear several unknown persons in the restroom that appeared to use the restroom for its intended use. The presence of others did not seem to deter Craig as he moved his right foot so that it touched the side of my left foot which was within my stall area," the report states.
Craig then proceeded to swipe his hand under the stall divider several times, and Karsnia noted in his report that "I could ... see Craig had a gold ring on his ring finger as his hand was on my side of the stall divider." Craig called the incident a "misunderstanding. Sure Senator, of course it was a misunderstanding. That's why you plead guilty to the charge.
What makes the case funnier is when you look at Craig's voting record: Voted YES on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. (Jun 2006) Voted NO on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes. (Jun 2002) Voted NO on expanding hate crimes to include sexual orientation. (Jun 2000) Voted YES on prohibiting same-sex marriage. (Sep 1996) Voted NO on prohibiting job discrimination by sexual orientation. (Sep 1996) Well Larry, I guess you can't complain when you're fired from Congress for your sexual orientation then, can you?
Oh, and about that Clinton/Monica thing? Remember back on January 24, 1999, on Meet The Press, when you said: Well, I don't know where the Senate's going to be on that issue of an up or down vote on impeachment, but I will tell you that the Senate certainly can bring about a censure resolution and it's a slap on the wrist. It's a, "Bad boy, Bill Clinton. You're a naughty boy." The American people already know that Bill Clinton is a bad boy, a naughty boy.
I'm going to speak out for the citizens of my state, who in the majority think that Bill Clinton is probably even a nasty, bad, naughty boy. The question issue now is simply this: Did he lie under oath? Did he perjure himself and did he obstruct justice? And that's where we're trying to go now in this truth-seeking process. You were talking about impeaching him for what? Being a naughty boy? If he was a "naughty boy" for what he did, what does that make you? You talk about "lying under oath and obstruction of justice" and yet you were vocally and vehemently outraged when the exact same charges were levelled against your guy Scooter Libby? Republicans wonder why they keep getting accused of hypocrisy?
I don't care if you're gay, or a pervert, or hiding in your wife's closet, or what you do in your spare time among consenting adults. But when you berate, degrade, and discriminate against others for the exact same thing you are guilty of doing, it makes you a hypocrite and a liar and unfit for public office. STFU, pack your shit (oh yeah, that's already been done, hasn't it?), and go home you flaming hypocrite.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Monday, August 27, 2007
|
Just can't stop watching...
posted by
Wally
2:04 PM
As much as these two men have damaged our nation, as much of an embarrassment as they both are, I can't stop watching. It's like a train-wreck in slow motion. This time the train is the Bush presidency...
Gonzo Resigns...
Bush whines...
The power of this administration declines...
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Who will replace Fredo?
posted by
Wally
9:14 AM
Alberto Gonzales has officially announced his resignation, making the following statement - one that is as moving, insigtful, and thought provoking as one would expect from a man of Fredo's stature and intellect.
Good morning.
Thirteen years ago I entered public service to make a positive difference in the lives of others. And during this time I have traveled a remarkable journey, from my home state of Texas to Washington, D.C., supported by the unwavering love and encouragement of my wife Rebecca and our sons Jared, Graham and Gabriel.
Yesterday I met with President Bush and informed him of my decision to conclude my government service as attorney general of the United States effective as of September 17th, 2007.
Let me say that it's been one of my greatest privileges to lead the Department of Justice. I have great admiration and respect for the men and women who work here. I have made a point as attorney general to personally meet as many of them as possible, and today I want to again thank them for their service to our nation.
It is through their continued work that our country and our communities remain safe, that the rights and civil liberties of our citizens are protected, and the hopes and dreams of all of our children are secured.
I often remind our fellow citizens that we live in the greatest country in the world and that I have lived the American dream. Even my worst days as Attorney General have been better than my father's best days.
Public service is honorable and noble. And I am profoundly grateful to President Bush for his friendship and for the many opportunities he has given me to serve the American people.
Thank you, and God bless America. Yup, that was it. Fortunately, it was short enough where 1) you probably didn't fall asleep and 2) you didn't have time to get annoyed or offended at the lies, arrogance, and stupidity of this man to hurl anything heavy at the TV (or in this case, monitor).
Now that he's gone, rumors are swirling about who will be the next Attorney General. Speculation centers around this man:

That's Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff, not Skeletor - though I understand the confusion. But I have a much better suggestion:

Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Gonzales Resigns as Attorney General
posted by
Wally
6:29 AM
Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, whose tenure has been marred by controversy and accusations of perjury before Congress, has resigned. A senior administration official said he would announce the decision later this morning in Washington.
Mr. Gonzales, who had rebuffed calls for his resignation, submitted his to President Bush by telephone on Friday, the official said. His decision was not immediately announced, the official added, until after the president invited him and his wife to lunch at his ranch near here.
Mr. Bush has not yet chosen a replacement but will not leave the position open long, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the Attorney General's resignation had not yet been made public. Time for Harry Reid to call in that "emergency session" of the Senate, because I don't even want to think of who Bush will replace Fredo with if he is allowed a "recess appointment".
Meantime... if you were looking for a reason to celebrate....

...And STAY out!!
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:19 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Bush at the microphones.

Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Sunday, August 26, 2007
|
Progress in Iraq is getting progressively worse
posted by
Clyde
5:26 AM
Iraq Body Count Running at Double Pace
This year's U.S. troop buildup has succeeded in bringing violence in Baghdad down from peak levels, but the death toll from sectarian attacks around the country is running nearly double the pace from a year ago.
Some of the recent bloodshed appears the result of militant fighters drifting into parts of northern Iraq, where they have fled after U.S.-led offensives. Baghdad, however, still accounts for slightly more than half of all war-related killings -- the same percentage as a year ago, according to figures compiled by The Associated Press.
The tallies and trends offer a sobering snapshot after an additional 30,000 U.S. troops began campaigns in February to regain control of the Baghdad area. It also highlights one of the major themes expected in next month's Iraq progress report to Congress: some military headway, but extremist factions are far from broken.
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Telling the truth has consequences
posted by
Clyde
5:11 AM
Iraq Whistleblowers Vilified, Demoted Those Who Speak Out Against Corruption In Iraq Reconstruction Say U.S. Gov't Treats Them Like Criminals
One after another, the men and women who have stepped forward to report corruption in the massive effort to rebuild Iraq have been vilified, fired and demoted.
Or worse.
For daring to report illegal arms sales, Navy veteran Donald Vance says he was imprisoned by the American military in a security compound outside Baghdad and subjected to harsh interrogation methods.
There were times, huddled on the floor in solitary confinement with that head-banging music blaring dawn to dusk and interrogators yelling the same questions over and over, that Vance began to wish he had just kept his mouth shut.
(link)
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
|
Saturday, August 25, 2007
|
We losing our privacy for this?
posted by
Clyde
5:11 AM
Terror Suspect List Yields Few Arrests
The government's terrorist screening database flagged Americans and foreigners as suspected terrorists almost 20,000 times last year. But only a small fraction of those questioned were arrested or denied entry into the United States, raising concerns among critics about privacy and the list's effectiveness.
A range of state, local and federal agencies as well as U.S. embassies overseas rely on the database to pinpoint terrorism suspects, who can be identified at borders or even during routine traffic stops. The database consolidates a dozen government watch lists, as well as a growing amount of information from various sources, including airline passenger data. The government said it was planning to expand the data-sharing to private-sector groups with a "substantial bearing on homeland security," though officials would not be more specific.
Few specifics are known about how the system operates, how many people are detained or turned back from borders, or the criteria used to identify suspects. The government will not discuss cases, nor will it confirm whether an individual's name is on its list.
(Big Brother)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Booming economy alert - Major lenders close too collapse
posted by
Clyde
4:56 AM
Fed bends rules to help two big banks
In a clear sign that the credit crunch is still affecting the nation's largest financial institutions, the Federal Reserve agreed this week to bend key banking regulations to help out Citigroup and Bank of America according to documents posted Friday on the Fed's web site.
The Aug. 20 letters from the Fed to Citigroup and Bank of America state that the Fed, which regulates large parts of the U.S. financial system, has agreed to exempt both banks from rules that effectively limit the amount of lending that their federally-insured banks can do with their brokerage affiliates. The exemption, which is temporary, means, for example, that Citigroup's Citibank entity can substantially increase funding to Citigroup Global Markets, its brokerage subsidiary. Citigroup and Bank of America requested the exemptions, according to the letters, to provide liquidity to those holding mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, and other securities.
This unusual move by the Fed shows that the largest Wall Street firms are continuing to have problems funding operations during the current market difficulties, according to banking industry skeptics. The Fed's move appears to support the view that even the biggest brokerages have been caught off guard by the credit crunch and don't have financing to deal with the resulting dislocation in the markets. The opposing, less negative view is that the Fed has taken this step merely to increase the speed with which the funds recently borrowed at the Fed's discount window can flow through to the bond markets, where the mortgage mess has caused a drying up of liquidity.
(Corporate Welfare anyone?)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Friday, August 24, 2007
|
iRan
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
2:35 PM
US 'poised to strike Iran'

Bob Baer, the former Middle East CIA operative whose first book about his life inspired the oil-and-espionage thriller Syriana, is working on a new book on Iran, but says he was told by senior intelligence officials that he had better get it published in the next couple of months because things could be about to change.
Baer, in an interview with The Weekend Australian, says his contacts in the administration suggest a strategic airstrike on Iran is a real possibility in the months ahead.
Washington's intelligence community is abuzz about possible military action against Iran, which is being weighed at the highest levels of the Bush administration. While the guessing game has become "will they or won't they?", at least some experienced and trusted intelligence sources have told The Weekend Australian that the possibility of a strike in the next 12 months remains remote.
.....
A case for a strike became more prominent last week when The New York Times reported the Bush administration was preparing to declare the Revolutionary Guard Corps a foreign terrorist organisation.
"If imposed, the declaration would signal a more confrontational turn in the administration's approach to Iran and would be the first time that the United States has added the armed forces of any sovereign government to its list of terrorist organisations," the Times reported.
The Revolutionary Guard is said to be the largest branch of Iran's military.
Exit Strategy
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Somewhere in the Massachusetts countryside...
posted by
Wally
9:34 AM
...someone had a message for anyone flying overhead.
The hell with crop circles, this guy had something more important to mow into his field. This was found on Google Earth. Run your mouse over the image to see the "zoomed in" version.

Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Cut and Run Republicans? Or Just Flip-Floppers?
posted by
Wally
6:53 AM
Key Republican Senator Calls For Troop Withdrawal From Iraq
An influential U.S. Senate Republican says President Bush should announce an initial withdrawal of troops from Iraq on September 15. Senator John Warner of Virginia made his comments to reporters Thursday, just days after visiting Iraq.
Senator Warner, a member and former chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, says he is recommending that President Bush announce the beginning of a troop withdrawal from Iraq on September 15 as a way to press the Iraqi government into taking steps toward political reconciliation.
"Take into consideration the need to send a sharp and clear message throughout the region, to the United States, and one that people can understand; I think [there is] no clearer form of that than for the president to announce on the 15th, that in consultation with senior military commanders, he has decided to initiate the first step in a withdrawal of our forces," said Senator Warner. Voice of America
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:38 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption

Permalink
::
5 comments
::
|
|
|
Thursday, August 23, 2007
|
Jon Stewart - America To The Rescue!
posted by
Wally
2:23 PM
Jon gives a quick lesson in America's foreign policy in the Middle East, and why it's turned out so well, in a way that only he can. Watch, and learn.
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
All New Clyde's Corner: "The Least of Our Worries"
posted by
Wally
8:11 AM
Clyde takes a good hard look at the Chinese steel industry, and doesn't like what he sees. With over 700,000 tons of structural metal pipe (the kind used in power plants, chemical refineries, etc) coming from China - fully 60% of our imports of this type of product - Clyde has spent enough time in the industry to know that there's reason for concern.Recently, a lot of focus has been placed upon goods coming from China because they pose serious health risks for both humans and animals. This problem exists because of lackadaisical quality control, inexperience and outright indifference by Chinese manufacturers. Compound that with an import system that does little to no inspection, as well as a Chinese government that places little value on human life, and it becomes a recipe for destruction.
While lead based paint on toys or seafood laced with antibiotics are of great concern, they could only be the tip of the iceberg and something far more sinister could be lying just below the surface.
Evidence is mounting that cheaply made goods from China do not meet the levels of safety that the American people expect and deserve. With that in mind, the question becomes a matter of not if a catastrophic event will occur, but when and how bad.
(snip)
For example, below are two pictures of a ruptured piece of pipe that was installed in the Huadian Datong Power Station in the Qinghai Province of China.  (click images for MUCH larger versions)
(snip)
What industries do not use metal of some type? Chemical refineries, water treatment and waste water facilities, natural gas/petroleum tank farms and pipelines are all susceptible to having these products installed as integral parts of their production and distribution systems. When you include other areas where steel is being used (buildings, railroads, bridges, and the automotive industry), one must wonder when and to what magnitude a crisis will happen.
(snip)
What is not as well known is that because of quality concerns, the Chinese government will not allow Chinese made goods to be used in critical areas of their power plants. Hence, you have the scenario that was presented above. So if the Chinese government is concerned enough to place a ban on Chinese goods, shouldn't we? Read the whole story in this week's Clyde's Corner
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Asinine
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:50 AM
Yesterday, President Chucklenuts paid a visit to us in KC. He spoke to the VFW and compared Iraq to the war in Viet-fucking-nam. Funny how he can do that since he never spent a single minute in the jungle. Anyway, the people of KC were not happy with his visit yesterday. Secret Service shut down two major interstates in the downtown area yesterday. Talk about traffic hell. But you think that's bad, getta load what happend to this poor guy:
Bush's visit leaves some residents angry, but not over politics
KANSAS CITY, Mo. - Towed and ticketed, several people on the Country Club Plaza are griping about President Bush's visit to the metro.
The president's motorcade made many in the metro smile Wednesday, as he was seen breakfasting with dignitaries and made a speech at the VFW convention.
Bill Cary was not among them, but it had nothing to do with politics.
"What angered me was the fact that I didn't have any notice," said Cary.
He is angry because at midnight Wednesday morning, the city towed his car because it was parked in front of his Plaza apartment on Roanoke Parkway. The problem was that the president's motorcade used Roanoke Parkway. As a result, so for security reasons, police made it an emergency no-parking zone and towed several cars overnight - including Bill's.
"I thought it was stolen," said Cary.
Wednesday morning, on his way to work, Cary said, he and several other unaware neighbors were forced to pay $145 to retrieve their cars from tow lots.
Adding insult to injury, Cary got a $38 ticket for parking in a no-parking zone.
"We park here everyday," Cary said. "It would have been easy to put up a notice saying you have 24 hours to remove your vehicle... We had no notice at all. My car was ticketed right after midnight and towed minutes after the ticket was written."
The city did not return our phone calls seeking comment, Cary said he is hoping in the spirit of the presidential visit the city will offer pardons for parking offenders.
"I would like to have the city reimburse people the towing expense and waive the ticket," he said.
Thanks Bush 
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
John "Captain Kangaroo" Bolton: I 'Absolutely' Hope The U.S. Will Attack Iran In The Next 'Six Months'
posted by
Wally
6:30 AM
Not content to just beat the drums for war and try to get Americans to crap their pants in fear at the evil Iranian WMD's (just like they did a few years ago for that other country that begins with the letters I-R-A) so we'll all support a war if it happens, Bushies are actually HOPING for war with Iran. Yesterday, Raw Story pointed out that former CIA operative Bob Baer told Fox News that the Bush administration will likely attack Iran in the coming months. "Iran policy is on close hold, but the feeling is we will hit the Islamic Revolutionary Guard corps sometime next six months or so," said Baer. (read what Baer said in this Time Magazine article)
Today, former U.N. ambassador John "the moustache" Bolton appeared on Fox News and responded. He said that while he couldn't confirm Baer's statements, he "absolutely" hoped they were true:
HEMMER: One final step here, too, that I want to take with you. You told one of our producers earlier today that you don't know if it's true - and you've made that clear in our interview here, that you don't know what the odds are or are not against that - but you hope it's true. Why do you hope it's true?
BOLTON: Absolutely. I hope Iran understands that we are very serious, that we are determined they are not going to get a nuclear weapon capability, and unless they change the strategic decision they've been pursuing for close to 20 years, that that's something they better factor into their calculations.
Read more of the story and (some of) the transcript at ThinkProgress.org
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
|
Wednesday, August 22, 2007
|
Is it because he ate too much lead paint as a kid?
posted by
Wally
10:16 AM
Why does George Bush hate children?
For the past couple months, Bush has been fighting to prevent the expansion of health insurance for low income children, threatening to veto SCHIP bills allowing for more children to be covered. Now we find out that he has been actively fighting efforts to protect them from dangerous toys from China (and other places).The Bush administration and China have both undermined efforts to tighten rules designed to ensure that lead paint isn't used in toys, bibs, jewelry and other children's products.
Both have fought efforts to better police imported toys from China.
The Bush administration has hindered regulation on two fronts, consumer advocates say. It stalled efforts to press for greater inspections of imported children's products, and it altered the focus of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, moving it from protections for consumers to a more manufacturer-friendly approach.
"The overall philosophy (of the administration) is regulations are bad, and they are too large a cost for industry, and the market will take care of it," said Rick Melberth, director of regulatory policy at OMBWatch, a government watchdog group formed in 1983. "Too large a cost"? And what's the cost of poisoning our children? Oh, never mind, with private health insurance (for those who can affort it), "the market will take care of" that too.
Eat Lead, Sucker
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
George Bush cares about brown people
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
10:02 AM
Bush concerned about hurricane victims 
MONTEBELLO, Quebec - President Bush, at a North American summit on Tuesday, offered U.S. assistance and expressed his concern for the citizens of Mexico and elsewhere whose lives were affected by Hurricane Dean.
"We stand ready to help," said Bush, standing alongside Mexican President Felipe Calderon and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. "The American people care a lot about the human condition in our neighborhood and when we see human suffering we want to do what we can."
Security and trade issues dominated talks among the North American leaders who met at a posh chateau along the Ottawa River. The three leaders began talks Tuesday with a council of corporate executives, who are pushing for broader coordination across North America, from regulatory standards to emergency planning.
But not the blacks!
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
The State of the Union is strong!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:32 AM
POLL: Consumer Confidence Tanks in Sharpest Drop in 20 Years

The consumer confidence decline is blamed on the stock market fall, gasoline prices and the Iraq war.
Consumer confidence sustained its steepest one-week drop in more than 20 years of ongoing polls this week, falling to its lowest level since the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in late October 2005.
The ABC News/Washington Post Consumer Comfort Index lost an extraordinary nine points to -20 on its scale of +100 to -100, down from -11 last week, and a summertime high of -5 four weeks ago. Before now, the index never has fallen by more than seven points in a single week in 1,130 weeks of consecutive polling.
The decline is broadly based among population groups, and there seems not to be a single negative event to blame, but a confluence: the stock market's fall, troubled housing and credit markets, the Fed's expressions of concern about an economic downturn, the cumulative effect of high gasoline prices during the summer driving months, and a public broadly dispirited over the course of national events, driven by the unpopular war in Iraq.
Stay the course!
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
"I want to know why I'm planning a funeral while George Bush is planning a wedding."
posted by
Wally
7:08 AM
I'm sure that Army Sgt. Princess C. Samuels' parents aren't the only ones asking that question. I am also sure that none of them will ever get an answer from George Bush.A graduate of Charles H. Flowers High School in Springdale, where she was in ROTC, Samuels, of Mitchellville, was killed by enemy fire Wednesday in Taji, Iraq. She was stationed there as an intelligence officer with Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division, according to a Defense Department statement.
(snip)
She said her daughter was terrified to be in Iraq and planned to leave the military as soon as she could. Lawal also said her daughter was not cut out to be a soldier and tried to hide her fear during their telephone calls, including their last one, on Aug. 6, when Samuels called to wish her mother a happy birthday.
"She was just like the other soldiers," Lawal said. "They can't come out and say it because they will get in trouble, but many of them don't believe in this mission. She didn't."
(snip)
"I am very upset that this has happened," Samuels's distraught mother, Anika Lawal of Waldorf, said yesterday. "I want to know why I'm planning a funeral while George Bush is planning a wedding." Because the president is a heartless thoughtless coward, and he doesn't give a rat's ass about you or your daughter. She was just another "comma" in his legacy.
Send Jenna to Iraq
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Bush tells middle class kids: Drop Dead
posted by
Wally
6:53 AM
Bush moves to restrict state health insurance programs for children, leaving 10's of thousands of kids without healthcare
Bush thinks that "states rights" are a great thing, when he's talking about abortion rights (as in, "nobody can have one"). But once the fetus pops out of the birth canal, that baby is on it's own.
A growing number of states moving to expand the SCHIP (State Children's Health Insurance Program) to cover more children, and Bush doesn't like that idea one bit. Those pesky kids should either pay bundles of cash to his buddies in the insurance business in the form of premiums, and co-pays, and deductibles, or else use Bush's "faith based health care" system - pray they stay healthy.The Bush administration, fighting efforts by states and Congress to expand a popular U.S. health program for children in low-income families, is making it more difficult for families to sign up.
The 10-year-old program was designed to provide medical insurance to children whose families earn too much to qualify for Medicaid, the federal-state program for the poor, and can't afford to buy private health coverage. President George W. Bush has threatened to veto bills passed by the House and Senate to expand funding for Schip, which now covers 6 million children.
The new policy sets more-restrictive standards for states that want to expand eligibility to households above 250 percent of the poverty level, which amounts to $51,625 in annual income for a family of four. Tens of thousands of children would become uninsured in at least 23 states that provide, or plan to provide, coverage exceeding these limits, said Rachel Klein, deputy director of health policy for Families USA, a consumer group in Washington. Sorry kids, you can't have health care. The government can't afford to keep you healthy because it needs that tax money to kill people and blow things up in far away lands, and then pay Halliburton to rebuild those things (so they can blow them up again).
Sicko
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:17 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya with Canadian Governor General Michaelle Jean

Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
|
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
|
File this under "No shiat Sherlock"
posted by
Wally
2:25 PM
Report says Tenet and CIA were unprepared for al-Qaeda threat and didn't do enough to prevent 9/11
Ya think? Anyone paying attention has been agonizingly aware of this since, oh, say September 15th 2001. Those paying close attention, like former counter-terrorism coordinator for the National Security Council Richard Clarke were aware of it long before 9/11. And now, over two years after a report was completed by the CIA's internal watchdog (and immediately classified by the Bush administration), the rest of the world gets the news too. The CIA's top leaders failed to use their available powers, never developed a comprehensive plan to stop al-Qaida and missed crucial opportunities to thwart two hijackers in the run-up to Sept. 11, the agency's own watchdog concluded in a bruising report released Tuesday.
Completed in June 2005 and kept classified until now, the 19-page executive summary finds extensive fault with the actions of senior CIA leaders and others beneath them. "The agency and its officers did not discharge their responsibilities in a satisfactory manner," the CIA inspector general found.
While blame is heaped on Tenet and his deputies, the report also says that Tenet was forcefully engaged in counterterrorism efforts and personally sounded the alarm before Congress, the military and policymakers. In a now well-known 1998 memo, he declared, "We are at war."
The trouble, the report said, was follow-up. The trouble is always about follow-up with these guys. They talk a great game, but when it comes time to put that talk into action, they sit back and hope that someone else will take charge and do something.
And for this, Bush gave Tenet the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Sleeping on the job
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Bush referring to himself?
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:03 PM
Bush today:
"And I think there's a certain level of frustration with the leadership in general, inability to work -- come together..."
.....
"The fundamental question is, will the government respond to the demands of the people," the president said. "And if the government doesn't ... respond to the demands of the people, they will replace the government." Just kidding. He was talking about Iraq. Now get back to work!

Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
58 > 29
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
9:16 AM
Last week, we told you about Rudy Giuliani's whole 29 hours as a "rescue worker" at Ground Zero after 9/11. Devoting 29 hours of your personal time to something is really generous of you Rudy:
After 9/11, Rudy wasn't a rescue worker -- he was a Yankee

On Friday, a New York Times story examined Rudy Giuliani's schedule in the months after 9/11 to verify his controversial claim that, like rescue workers, he'd spent long hours at ground zero, and so was "in that sense ... one of them." In fact, the Times found, he only spent 29 hours at the terror site between Sept. 17 and Dec. 16.
What was he doing instead? Giuliani's beloved New York Yankees made it to the World Series in 2001. We decided to compare the time he spent on baseball to the time he spent at the ruins of the World Trade Center.
The results were, considering the mayor's long-standing devotion to the Bronx Bombers, unsurprising. By our count, Giuliani spent about 58 hours at Yankees games or flying to them in the 40 days between Sept. 25 and Nov. 4, roughly twice as long as he spent at ground zero in the 90 days between Sept. 17 and Dec. 16. By his own standard, Giuliani was one of the Yankees more than he was one of the rescue workers.
During three postseason playoff series that began Oct. 10, 2001, and ended Nov. 4, 2001, Giuliani attended every one of the team's home games, with the possible exception of the third game of the American League Championship Series, for which Salon could not confirm his attendance. According to Salon's arithmetic, Giuliani spent about 33 hours in stadiums -- this includes two World Series games he watched in Phoenix -- during the Yankees' 2001 postseason run, four hours more than he spent at ground zero. (We do not know if he stayed for every pitch, but famed baseball writer Roger Angell described Giuliani in the the New Yorker as a "devout Yankee fan, a guy who stays on until the end of the game.")
Play ball!
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
It's not "political theater" when the White House does it
posted by
Wally
9:11 AM
Guess what day Patreaus will be testifying about the Iraq Progress Report
Next month, General Patreaus will issue his Iraq progress report that Congress has been eagerly anticipating, waiting to hear how well the Surge is working so that they can decide how to proceed with the Iraq occupation. Of course, the objective report will be written by the White House, so you know that it will be accurate and trustworthy - a sound basis for Congress to use for making decisions about the war. But this administration doesn't want to rely only on the fact that they get to present their own specially modified version of the story to convince Congress to keep funding and supporting endless occupation. No, they are taking it one step further and going for the emotional twist as well, shoving the General in front of Congress on, you guessed it, September 11.
But don't worry, it's not "political theater".

The White House said Monday that Gen. David Petraeus likely will testify before Congress on the sixth anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
The highly anticipated report from Petraeus and Crocker is seen as a potential turning point in America's involvement in Iraq. Several Republicans, who so far have refused to side with Democratic calls for withdrawal, have said they wanted to hear from Petraeus and Crocker before making any decisions regarding U.S. troop levels.
According to Bush spokesman Gordon Johndroe, the fact that the pair likely will appear before Congress on Sept. 11 has nothing to do with the anniversary of the attack, but was rather dictated by Congress's tight schedule. Riiiiight. It has nothing to do with it, because we all know that this administration would never ever ever be so callous, shallow, or transparent enough to use the tragedy of 9/11 for political purposes.

9/11 9/11 9/11
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Heckuva job, Sticky!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:16 AM
Brownie, Rummy, Condi, Sticky, etc. Just another world class f*ckup Bush appoints:
Federal mine safety official's credentials questioned

The families of the Crandall Canyon miner's aren't the only ones raising questions about the handling of the rescue effort.
Many news organizations and blogs are also now asking questions about the governments role and the man chosen to lead the rescue effort, Mine and Health Safety Administrator, Richard Stickler.
Increasing attention is now being paid to Stickler, the federal government's main mine man.
Stickler used to be a mining executive who - according to various media reports - ran mines which had several fatalities and "...an incident rate that was often twice the national average."
After his nomination was twice rejected by the Senate, President Bush gave Richard Stickler the mine safety job with a recess appointment.
That's a presidential appointment made when congress is not in session.
Dick Stick

Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Smoke and mirrors...
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:35 AM
What great Allies we have...
Pakistan frees 'al-Qaeda suspect'
A Pakistani computer expert alleged to have had links with al-Qaeda has been released without charge after three years in custody.
Mohammad Naeem Noor Khan, 25, has been reunited with his family in the city of Karachi, officials and his lawyer said.
Mr Khan was accused of acting as a link between al-Qaeda leaders and militants.
His detention led to the arrest of a suspect in the 1998 US embassy bombings in East Africa, and information on terror plots in the UK and US. Nothing too big, right? Then check out this...
Taliban, US in new round of peace talks
The few weeks between the visits to Pakistan of Richard Boucher, the US assistant secretary of state who left last week, and Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte, who arrives on September 10, could prove crucial in determining the fate of Afghanistan.
This is the timeline for secret three-party talks to establish teega (a Pashtu word for a peace deal that resolves a conflict) between the Western coalition forces in Afghanistan (with Pakistan), the Afghan government, and the anti-coalition insurgents of Afghanistan. The first round of talks has already begun in the southwestern Pakistani city of Quetta, Asia Times Online has learned.
The outcome of the talks will to a large extent decide the agenda of Negroponte's visit and the course of the US-led "war on terror" in the region.
The talks are based on previous Pakistan-inspired efforts to secure peace deals between the insurgents and the Western coalition in specific areas in Afghanistan with the longer-term goal of incorporating the Taliban into the political process both in Kabul and in provincial governments. I'm beginning to believe Bush wants this country attacked again before he leaves office. He can either declare martial law or help the republicans win the White House again. What I don't get is how he can do the latter. If the repukes are so tough on terror and protecting the homeland, they better hope we never get attacked again.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Times up for White House to produce subpoenad documents. Leahy threatens to make another harshly worded statement.
posted by
Wally
7:26 AM
For the third time, the White House has missed the deadline for producing subpoenad documents surrounding the Dept of Justice attorney firings. For the third time, Sen. Patrick Leahy is flapping his jaws making menacing sounding noises, threatening to hold members of the administration in contempt for ignoring the subpoena. For the third time, the White House is trying not to laugh at his threats. A top Senate Democrat on Monday threatened to hold members of the Bush administration in contempt for not producing subpoenaed information about the legal justification for President Bush's secretive eavesdropping program. The administration is like a bratty little kid who keeps grabbing cookies off the kitchen table while mom (Congress) keeps saying "You're gonna get it" "Don't make me warn you again." "I'm not going to tell you again." "This time I really mean it." "This is the last time I'm warning you." Like the bratty little kid, Cheney and the White House will continue to look Congress in the eyes, knowing damn well they're not going to do anything except issue another stern statements, and grab another handful of cookies. "When the Senate comes back in the session, I'll bring it up before the committee," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. "I prefer cooperation to contempt. Right now, there's no question that they are in contempt of the valid order of the Congress." MSNBC Oooh, I'm sure they are sooooo scared. In fact, they are so nervous about the threat of upcoming contempt charges that they are finally beginning to consider negotiating with Congress, offering to hand over "some" of the documents that have been demanded if Congress caves in and gives it even more unrestrained wiretapping power.The Bush administration yesterday signaled to Senate Democrats that it will provide the legal rationale for its domestic surveillance program if Democrats reciprocate by permanently updating the key law governing foreign spying. WashTimes Come on Leahy, you should have these guys arrested for Contempt of Congress, and you're sitting there letting them play Lets Make a Deal with you. Democrats hold the majority of both houses of Congress, have the backing of 70% of the population on this issue, and they're letting themselves be pushed around by a bunch of thugs.
Call or write your Congress-critters and insist that they stop issuing harshly worded statements and empty threats, and actually DO SOMETHING.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Monday, August 20, 2007
|
More sh*t you can't make up
posted by
Wally
12:54 PM
When I started reading this, I had to look again to make sure I wasn't reading an Onion article. Since the spoiled little rich brat is no longer getting every damn thing he wants....
George Bush says he's a "Dissident"
By the time he arrived in Prague in June for a democracy conference, President Bush was frustrated. He had committed his presidency to working toward the goal of "ending tyranny in our world," yet the march of freedom seemed stalled. Just as aggravating was the sense that his own government was not committed to his vision. Granted, that's a noble "vision". Pity that he didn't have anything resembling a "plan" or a "strategery" to help guide the way towards achieving that "vision".As he sat down with opposition leaders from authoritarian societies around the world, he gave voice to his exasperation. "You're not the only dissident," Bush told Saad Eddin Ibrahim, a leader in the resistance to Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. "I too am a dissident in Washington. Bureaucracy in the United States does not help change." That's right. George Bush - the leader of the free world - is a "dissident". The man who for the past 6 1/2 years has been shielded from all dissent - having all those who disagree with or disapprove of him shoved out of sight and out of earshot in his newly created "Free Speech Zones" - is a "dissident".
The man who will neither close Gitmo nor let those indefinitely imprisoned there defend themselves against the accusations leveled against them - or even tell them what those accusations are - is a dissident.
The man who has systematically been grasping for more, and more consolidated power - accusing all those who disagree with him or his policies "traitors" - is a dissident.
The man who has called the Constitution "just a damn peice of paper", and cast it aside when it inconveniences him with "laws" and "rules" that he doesn't like - is a "dissident".
The man who has issued over 750 "signing statements" saying that he and he alone is exempt from the bills that he is signing into law is a "dissident".
And why is he a "dissident"? Because the people in Congress, in the Judiciary, in his own Cabinet departments are no longer fawning over him and falling over each other to make his vision a reality - even though nobody really knows exactly what the fuck his "vision" is, beyond nebulous platitudes such as "ending tyranny" and "spreading democracy".
Granted, those are great and noble ideas. Just like the great and noble ideas of curing disease, ending poverty, eliminating hunger, and establishing world peace (never mind about the last one, we're talking about Bush and Cheney). They're all great ideas. Nice to dream about. Easy to talk about (and cheap). Extremely difficult, if not impossible, to accomplish. So George, how do you intend to make it happen? Oh, you have no plans? You think you can just "say" these things and your people will make them happen?
I envision George saying "Condi, go out there and end tyranny!" and smacking her on the ass and sending her on her way, like a high school football coach sending a player onto the field hoping to make the big play and win the game.

Good luck with that George. You're not a coach. You're not even a player. You're a cheerleader, just like you were a cheerleader when the other guys were playing ball in college. And as a cheerleader, if you had smacked the quarterback on the ass on the sideline, you'd probably get your ass kicked. But that doesn't make you a dissident. It just makes you a poor leader, and a crybaby, and a loser. Now STFU, have your mommy bring you a dictionary, and look up "dissident".
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
Some sh*t you can't make up.
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
12:52 PM
Fox on the other hand, can:
Fox News reports but can't confirm' Vick, Qaeda accusation 
Fox News carried a straight-faced report on Tuesday that NFL quarterback "Michael Vick is being sued for 63 trillion billion dollars" by Jonathan Lee Riches, a prisoner serving time at South Carolina's Williamsburg Federal Collection Facility.
Fox's story, in addition to inflating the damages sought by Riches--the inmate sought a mere $60 billion in damages--comes more than three weeks after the the plaintiff's court papers were filed on July 23, and arrives fairly late in the game for a story that was well-covered by bloggers as early as July 27.
Noting no new developments in the case, Fox's account added little veracity to a handwritten complaint that Vick stole two Riches' pit bulls, entered them in dog fights, subsequently sold the dogs on eBay, and, ultimately, used the proceeds to buy missiles from Iran on behalf of al Qaeda.
Shepard Smith, who recently promised he was "not going to do more crap," concluded the segment by stating, "Fox News can confirm none of this," followed by a heartfelt, "Good grief!"
Terra 1! Terra 2! Hike!
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Bush administration took less than 3 months to start using tax dollars to violate Hatch Act
posted by
Wally
8:57 AM
Bush Inaugurated January 20, 2001 Begins Violating Hatch Act March 12, 2001
From the time they took office, the Bush administration has been using federal funds for political purposes in violation of the Hatch Act, which prohibits government employees from using federal resources for election activities.Under Rove's direction, this highly coordinated effort to leverage the government for political marketing started as soon as Bush took office in 2001 and continued through last year's congressional elections.
In the past few months, revelations about a few dozen political briefings that Rove's team conducted at federal agencies and several election-related slides from those briefings have touched off investigations into whether the White House improperly politicized federal workers or misused government assets to win elections.
Investigators, however, said the scale of Rove's effort is far broader than previously revealed; they say that Rove's team gave more than 100 such briefings during the seven years of the Bush administration. The political sessions touched nearly all of the Cabinet departments and a handful of smaller agencies that often had major roles in providing grants, such as the White House office of drug policy and the State Department's Agency for International Development.
The White House has repeatedly said that Rove's team stayed within the confines of federal law and that the meetings were an effort to ensure the president's agenda and those who supported it were fully promoted. But the Office of the Special Counsel, which protects whistleblowers, has concluded that the Hatch Act was violated during one such briefing, conducted for General Services Administration political appointees by J. Scott Jennings, the White House's deputy director of political affairs. The only thing Bush, Rove, etc. were ever concerned about was winning elections. That "running the country" thing? The only part of that they cared about was how they could use it to their advantage in the next election to secure greater and more lasting power for themselves and the Republican party.
It would be nice to be able to enjoy watching how thoroughly that strategy backfired and the self-destruction of the Republican party. Unfortunately, it's not just the GOP that will pay the price for Bush's crimes. If it can be done at all, it will take generations to repair the damage done to our Constitution, our nation, our standing in the international community, our economy (yeah, it's great if you're a billionaire), the national debt, civil rights, the military, the rule of law.......
And they impeached Clinton for a blowjob.
"It was all politics, all the time." ~Henry Waxman
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Protecting Bush from dissent - now they have "Free Speech Zones" in Canada too
posted by
Wally
7:03 AM
Anti-Bush protestors march on Hill ahead of 'three amigos' summit
Between 1,000 and 2,000 demonstrators -- watched by a sizable police presence -- got a head start on the North American leaders' summit, which begins today in Montebello, Que., with meetings between Stephen Harper, George W. Bush and Felipe Calderon.
"Rallies at Parliament Hill are notoriously difficult to draw large crowds and I was impressed ... because there were events happening in other centres," Green party Leader Elizabeth May said.
"We are not anti-American," said Council of Canadians' national head Maude Barlow. "We are anti-George Bush."
Approximately 2,000 people joined a rally on Parliament Hill yesterday to protest the Security and Prosperity Partnership summit, which takes place in Montebello, Que., over the next two days Of course, even in Canada, George won't be allowed to come anywhere near anyone who might voice disagreement or disapproval, so all protesters are being sequestered off far away from the summit location. At least in Canada they have the decency to NOT call them "free speech zones" when they hide the protesters. Protesters will not be allowed near the summit site but will have their activities relayed to the leaders by a most unconventional method: video link. Actually, that might work out for the best. George has no problem ignoring "the people" but he does love his TV.Calderon will remain in Canada for an extra day after the summit to have a one-on-one meeting with Harper on Wednesday. Ostensibly so they can talk smack about the idiot warming the chair in the Oval Office.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:31 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
|
Sunday, August 19, 2007
|
How will Bush spin this?
posted by
Clyde
6:06 AM
Military commanders tell Brown to withdraw from Iraq without delay
Senior military commanders have told the Government that Britain can achieve "nothing more" in south-east Iraq, and that the 5,500 British troops still deployed there should move towards withdrawal without further delay.
Last month Gordon Brown said after meeting George Bush at Camp David that the decision to hand over security in Basra province - the last of the four held by the British - "will be made on the military advice of our commanders on the ground". He added: "Whatever happens, we will make a full statement to Parliament when it returns [in October]."
Two generals told The Independent on Sunday last week that the military advice given to the Prime Minister was, "We've done what we can in the south [of Iraq]". Commanders want to hand over Basra Palace - where 500 British troops are subjected to up to 60 rocket and mortar strikes a day, and resupply convoys have been described as "nightly suicide missions" - by the end of August. The withdrawal of 500 soldiers has already been announced by the Government. The Army is drawing up plans to "reposture" the 5,000 that will be left at Basra airport, and aims to bring the bulk of them home in the next few months.
Before the invasion in 2003, officers were told that the Army's war aims were to bring stability and democracy to Iraq and to the Middle East as a whole. Those ambitions have been drastically revised, the IoS understands. The priorities now are an orderly withdrawal, with the reputation and capability of the Army "reasonably intact", and for Britain to remain a "credible ally". The final phrase appears to refer to tensions with the US, which has more troops in Iraq than at any other time, including the invasion, as it seeks to impose order in Baghdad and neighbouring provinces.
(link)
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Help has a price tag
posted by
Clyde
5:51 AM
FEMA insurance rules change surprises local governments
In a little-noticed memo issued in June, the Federal Emergency Management Agency changed the insurance requirements that local governments and nonprofits must meet to be eligible for public assistance in times of disaster, putting groups such as hospitals, schools and parish governments on the hook for millions of dollars should another storm strike the New Orleans area.
The changes set much higher requirements for insurance coverage and essentially leave nonprofits and local governments solely responsible for paying their own insurance deductibles. Those deductibles, which FEMA used to pay, in some cases now cost tens of millions of dollars, and could leave many of these bodies financially vulnerable in the wake of a natural disaster. The regulatory changes, discovered by a New Orleans insurance agent, have public officials scrambling to intervene.
State Insurance Commissioner Jim Donelon has written to President Bush trying to get the new insurance requirements waived. Sen. Mary Landrieu's office has requested a briefing with FEMA on the issue Monday. And the local insurance agent, Hartwig Moss III, has organized a meeting Wednesday afternoon for public officials to help groups figure out what steps they need to take in advance of another hurricane to try to be exempted from the new rules.
"We believe that the vast majority of those in the not-for-profit and governmental communities are completely unaware of these issues and the potential for extremely serious consequences for their organization and indeed, for our community, as a result of these changes," said Moss, president of the Hartwig Moss Insurance Agency Ltd., which has been around for 135 years.
(link)
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
|
Saturday, August 18, 2007
|
Faith and fascism
posted by
Clyde
5:46 AM
Homeland Security Enlists Clergy to Quell Public Unrest if Martial Law Ever Declared
Could martial law ever become a reality in America? Some fear any nuclear, biological or chemical attack on U.S. soil might trigger just that. KSLA News 12 has discovered that the clergy would help the government with potentially their biggest problem: Us.
Charleton Heston's now-famous speech before the National Rifle Association at a convention back in 2000 will forever be remembered as a stirring moment for all 2nd Amendment advocates. At the end of his remarks, Heston held up his antique rifle and told the crowd in his Moses-like voice, "over my cold, dead hands."
While Heston, then serving as the NRA President, made those remarks in response to calls for more gun control laws at the time, those words live on. Heston's declaration captured a truly American value: An over-arching desire to protect our freedoms.
But gun confiscation is exactly what happened during the state of emergency following Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, along with forced relocation. U.S. Troops also arrived, something far easier to do now, thanks to last year's elimination of the 1878 Posse Comitatus act, which had forbid regular U.S. Army troops from policing on American soil.
(link)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Blaming the troops; it's what they do
posted by
Clyde
5:28 AM
Army Reports Brass, Not Bloggers, Breach Security
For years, the military has been warning that soldiers' blogs could pose a security threat by leaking sensitive wartime information. But a series of online audits, conducted by the Army, suggests that official Defense Department websites post material far more potentially harmful than anything found on a individual's blog.
The audits, performed by the Army Web Risk Assessment Cell between January 2006 and January 2007, found at least 1,813 violations of operational security policy on 878 official military websites. In contrast, the 10-man, Manassas, Virginia, unit discovered 28 breaches, at most, on 594 individual blogs during the same period.
The results were obtained by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, after the digital rights group filed a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act.
"It's clear that official Army websites are the real security problem, not blogs," said EFF staff attorney Marcia Hofmann. "Bloggers, on the whole, have been very careful and conscientious. It's a pretty major disparity."
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Friday, August 17, 2007
|
4,000
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
10:01 AM
Coalition death toll in Iraq hits 4,000

The number of coalition military deaths in the war in Iraq has reached 4,000.
The gloomy milestone was reached as a U.S. general said there has been a rise in insurgents booby-trapping houses.
Most of the fatalities throughout the Iraq war -- almost 3,704 -- have been U.S. military service members. That number also includes seven civilians working for the Pentagon.
The nearly 300 others hail from countries, such as Italy, Poland and Ukraine, that have supported the U.S. effort, which began in March 2003.
R.I.P.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
President 9/11, 2.0
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
9:10 AM
As we all remember on September 11th, NYC Mayor Judy Riuliani, I mean Rudy Giuliani, held the towers in place long enough for emergency crews to arrive on the scene. It's so refreshing to hear a presidential candidate remind us of 9/11 more times than our own President Bush. I mean, here's a guy who had been to the ruins at the World Trade Center "as often, if not more" than many clean-up workers in the months after the 9/11 attacks.
Wait a second. What's this from USA Today?
"A complete record of Mr. Giuliani's exposure to the site is not available for the chaotic six days after the attack, when he was a frequent visitor. But an exhaustively detailed account from his mayoral archive, revised after the events to account for last-minute changes on scheduled stops, does exist for the period of Sept. 17 to Dec. 16, 2001. It shows he was there for a total of 29 hours in those three months, often for short periods or to visit locations adjacent to the rubble. In that same period, many rescue and recovery workers put in daily 12-hour shifts.  Speaking of 9/11, or any variation of September 11th. Check out this article posted by Rudy this month. He mentions 9/11 over 100 TIMES! He even manages to use it in the very first sentence. If you're bored, this is a very long read. I recommend watching paint dry:
Toward a Realistic Peace Rudolph Giuliani
We are all members of the 9/11 generation.
The defining challenges of the twentieth century ended with the fall of the Berlin Wall. Full recognition of the first great challenge of the twenty-first century came with the attacks of September 11, 2001, even though Islamist terrorists had begun their assault on world order decades before. Confronted with an act of war on American soil, our old assumptions about conflict between nation-states fell away. Civilization itself, and the international system, had come under attack by a ruthless and radical Islamist enemy.
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Sick. Sick. Sick
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:46 AM
We can spend billions of dollars every month in Iraq but can't afford a $40 purple heart. This country is f*cked up:
Short of Purple Hearts, Navy tells vet to buy own
Korean War veteran Nyles Reed, 75, opened an envelope last week to learn a Purple Heart had been approved for injuries he sustained as a Marine on June 22, 1952.
But there was no medal. Just a certificate and a form stating that the medal was "out of stock."
"I can imagine, of course, with what's going on in Iraq and Afghanistan, there's a big shortage," Reed said. "At least, I would imagine so."
.....
After waiting 55 years, however, Reed decided to pay $42 for his own Purple Heart and accompanying ribbon - plus state sales taxes - at a military surplus store.
Support Our Vets! And this dumb republican-supporting bitch could care less:

Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:16 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of dubya "workin' hard" with his dad.
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Thursday, August 16, 2007
|
Open Bar!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
2:27 PM
Bush's daughter, Jenna, engaged

One of the president's daughters is getting married.
President Bush and first lady Laura Bush announced Thursday that their daughter, Jenna, is engaged to Henry Hager of Virginia.
No wedding date has been set, said Mrs. Bush's press secretary, Sally McDonough.
Jenna, one of the president's twin daughters, became engaged to Hager, the son of Mr. and Mrs. John H. Hager of Richmond, Va., on Wednesday."
Pregnant? Update:
Laura in 2005: "This is not a serious boyfriend. I hate to, I have to be the one to say it on television, but he's a very nice young man."
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
For once, Rudy Guiliani NOT in drag.
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
10:04 AM
Lion King character, yes:
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
That September Iraq report they've been promising? Never mind. They don't want you to see it.
posted by
Wally
10:03 AM
That's right. It's not even written yet, but already it's (wait for it) ....
Classified!
Senior congressional aides said yesterday that the White House has proposed limiting the much-anticipated appearance on Capitol Hill next month of Gen. David H. Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker to a private congressional briefing, suggesting instead that the Bush administration's progress report on the Iraq war should be delivered to Congress by the secretaries of state and defense.
White House officials suggested to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee last week that Petraeus and Crocker would brief lawmakers in a closed session before the release of the report, congressional aides said. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates would provide the only public testimony.
The legislation says that Petraeus and Crocker "will be made available to testify in open and closed sessions before the relevant committees of the Congress" before the delivery of the report. It also clearly states that the president "will prepare the report and submit the report to Congress" after consultation with the secretaries of state and defense and with the top U.S. military commander in Iraq and the U.S. ambassador. WaPo That's right boys and girls, the White House is proposing that General Petraeus's report be written and presented by none other than the White House! Try not to act surprised.
It get's better. According to this story in the LA Times (page 2 of the article):Despite Bush's repeated statements that the report will reflect evaluations by Petraeus and Ryan Crocker, the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, administration officials said it would actually be written by the White House, with inputs from officials throughout the government.
And though Petraeus and Crocker will present their recommendations on Capitol Hill, legislation passed by Congress leaves it to the president to decide how to interpret the report's data. So the White House not only gets to write the report. It also gets to interpret the meaning of the report that it gets to write. The implications of that are astounding. There is no longer any oversight whatsoever. No accountability. No separation of powers. No brakes on the train that Bush is driving headlong over a cliff. From where he's sitting locked securely in the engine, he can't hear all us screaming passengers.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Bush to Courts: Drop the lawsuits - state secrets! Court to Bush: Nice try, but we ain't buying it
posted by
Wally
6:16 AM
Finally, someone is showing some backbone in facing down the Bush administration's obsession with secrecy and lust for absolute unfettered power. Obviously it's not the Democrats in Congress. And most of "we the people" are too busy reading about Britney's lesbian romp with her personal assistant Shannon Funk (go ahead, you know you want to, here's the link) to do anything about it. Which leaves the Courts.
Fortunately, even with Bush stacking the Supreme Court, there are still justices in the Federal Court system who hold their oath to uphold the Constitution above their partisan loyalties to the King.
On Wednesday, Bush administration lawyers faced a Federal Appeals Court that wasn't buying it's claims of "state secrets" in it's argument that the court should drop litigation against the governments warrantless surveillance programs. "The bottom line here is the government declares something is a state secret, that's the end of it. No cases. . . . The king can do no wrong," said Judge Harry Pregerson, one of three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit who grilled administration lawyers at length over whether a pair of lawsuits against the government should go forward.
"This seems to put us in the 'trust us' category," Judge M. Margaret McKeown said about the government's assertions that its surveillance activities did not violate the law. " 'We don't do it. Trust us. And don't ask us about it.' "
At one point, Garre argued that courts are not the right forum for complaints about government surveillance, and that "other avenues" are available. "What is that? Impeachment?" Pregerson shot back. I think I like Justice Pregerson. "Well, who decides if something is a state secret or not?" Pregerson asked. "Are you saying the courts are to rubber-stamp the determination of the executive of what's a state secret? What's our job?" WaPo According to Bush, your job is to sit there and look official and keep up the front that we still have a free republic and a separation of powers. Oh, and make sure that those evil terrorists and liberals hang.
The judges weren't deciding the cases themselves, simply whether or not the cases may proceed - getting past the "Shhh, it's too secret for you to judge whether or not it's unconstitutional" phase and into the "is it unconstitutional?" phase. But the ruling is still of great significance in determining how much power the executive branch truly has, and how much the other two branches can restrict or even question that power. The appeals concern two related questions that must be answered before the merits of the challenges can be considered: whether the plaintiffs can clearly establish that they have been injured by the programs, giving them standing to sue; and whether the state secrets privilege requires dismissal of the suits on national security grounds.
Though the questions are preliminary, the impact of the appeals court's ruling may be quite broad. Should it rule for the government on either ground, the legality of the N.S.A. programs may never be adjudicated. NY Times In other words, if the courts rule in favor of the administration, the government can declare anything a "state secret", and that's it. End of story. No one can question it. No one can talk about it. No one can stop it. If that happens, Congress and the Courts may as well close up shop and go home, because at that point, Bush has achieved his goal of becoming dictator.
It's good to see the courts standing up to him. At least at this level. What happens when it hits Bush's new Supreme Court still makes me nervous.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Wednesday, August 15, 2007
|
As fresh as a Foghat concert...
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
9:57 AM
Fox's Half Hour News Hour Shelved

In a memo to senior producers this afternoon, FNC's SVP of programming, Bill Shine announced the network "will not continue the Half Hour News Hour beyond its current 15 episode run." Shine did leave the door open, however: "we are considering ways to retool the show for future scheduling needs."
The TV news satire show which airs Sunday nights, stars faux anchors Kurt McNally, played by Kurt Long, and Jennifer Lange, played by Jennifer Robertson.
The first airing, February 18 was a hit, with more than 1.4 million viewers. The show averaged 258,000 viewers (25-54 demo) in its last 10 airings, winning its timeslot all but once. FNC will air the final show September 16.
HaHa!
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Yesterday Rove. Today Fat Denny Hastert.
posted by
Wally
8:06 AM
Hastert Planning to Retire at End of 2008
After 11 1/2 terms chock full of Congressional douchebaggery, Dennis Hastert is stepping down. I don't know if he's saying he's doing it to "spend more time with his family" or so he can write a book, or because "it's time" or what. In my opinion, he's doing it for the good of the country - a cause he should have considered decades ago. Unfortunately, the good of the country has always been superseded, in Denny's mind, by the good of the Republican party and the neocon agenda.
Some examples of Hastert's reasoned and equitable use of power during his tenure as Speaker: He...set a standard for the GOP majority by only allowing legislation on the floor of the House that was backed by the "majority of the majority," an approach that all but denied Democrats a chance to help shape legislation.
The minority party had little say in conferences with the Senate during Hastert's tenure, because conference committees became an after-the-fact formality that rubber-stamped deals worked out by a handful of House and Senate Republican members who operated under the thumb of party leaders. Under his tenure, Democrats were often excluded from committee meetings and legislative negotiations completely. The Republican elite (Denny, Delay, Lott, Frist, etc) would work out the deals and bring the bills to the floor with little if any time for the Democrats to even look at what they were voting on. What amazes me is that any Democrat ever voted for anything. What they should have done is, for each time the Republicans pulled this maneuver, demand a full reading of the bill on the House floor before the vote (they have that right). But they pussed out and let fat-Denny bully them around, like they are still doing for Bush, even though they are in the majority. But I digress... Hastert further irritated the minority party by showing little desire to push committee chairmen to investigate problems in the executive branch, whether it was pre-war intelligence in Iraq or the federal response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005. In fact, once Bush took the Presidency, there wasn't a single investigation of the executive branch during Hastert's tenure. Not one. He also tried to block investigations into House scandals as well, including those involving Jack Abramoff, Tom Delay, Randy "Duke" Cunningham, Bob Ney, and let's not forget Mark Foley's little forays with Congressional pages.
He also had no problem violating House rules to strong-arm unpopular legislation that the Republican leadership wanted. In 2003, for example, Hastert held open a vote on a landmark Medicare drug bill for three hours, forcing a pre-dawn vote on a Saturday on what was then a major GOP priority. This bill, which made it illegal for the United States government to use it's massive purchasing power to negotiate better pricing on prescription drugs, was an enormous victory for the pharmaceutical industry - a huge contributor to the Republican party. By ramrodding this bill through the House, Hastert took tens of billions of dollars out of the pockets of American taxpayers and their parents and grandparents and handed it to the drug companies so they could use it to give their CEO's million dollar bonuses.
That is the legacy of Dennis Hastert. As John Edwards said yesterday in response to news of Rove's resignation....
"Goodbye, and good riddance"
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
If you still don't think Bush and Cheney want to invade Iran...
posted by
Wally
7:41 AM
...now they're calling Iran's elite Revolutionary Guard Corps a "terrorist group"
And we all know what that means. The Bush administration is preparing to declare that Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps is a foreign terrorist organization, senior administration officials said Tuesday.
If imposed, the declaration would signal a more confrontational turn in the administration's approach to Iran and would be the first time that the United States has added the armed forces of any sovereign government to its list of terrorist organizations. If the Iranian Guard is a terrorist organization, then, after invading two sovereign nations in the past 6 years and destroying their infrastructure, blowing up 1000's of buildings, markets, water and power supplies, roads, bridges, etc. and causing the death of 100's of 1,000's of people, what does that make our own military? President Bush seemed to signal a tougher approach to Iran last week when he called attention to what American officials have said was an active role by the Revolutionary Guard in providing munitions, training and other support to Shiite militants who have been attacking American troops in Iraq. "When we catch you playing a nonconstructive role, there will be a price to pay," Mr. Bush said of Iran during a news conference on Thursday. Wait a minute George. I thought that's what we were doing there - providing munitions, training, and other support. Oh, that's right, it's only okay when you do it. Anyone who tries to fight back when you attack them is a terrorist and freedom hater. I bet you were a great kid on the playground, beating up on the little kids and stealing their lunch money, and then running and crying to the teacher when one of them tried to fight back. In recent months, there has been resurgent debate within the administration about whether the diplomatic path is working, with aides to Vice President Dick Cheney said to be among those pushing for greater consideration of military options. Not that I have anything good to say about him, but with Rove gone, the last check on Cheney's power has been removed. And crazy uncle Dick really really wants to invade Iran.
Shock and Awe
I can't imagine that this would have had anything to do with it. Iran and Iraq have signed an energy accord.
The Iranian Oil Ministry said Baghdad and Teheran signed an agreement to build pipelines for the transfer of Iraqi crude oil and oil products. The ministry said the pipeline would transport crude oil from the Iraqi port of Basra to Iran's Abadan.
The accord, reported on Aug. 11, stipulated the Iranian purchase of 100,000 barrels of Iraqi crude. The crude would be refined in Iran's Bandar Abbas and resold to Iraq. No other details were reported.
In August 2006, Tehran and Baghdad signed a memorandum of understanding on energy issues that called on Iran to refine 100,000 barrels per day of Iraqi crude. In exchange, Teheran would supply two million liters per day of gasoline and other refined products to Iraq.
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
How low can he go?
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:37 AM
California's low approval rating of Bush catching on nationally

Californians' view of President Bush's performance remains dismal, according to a Field Poll released Tuesday, and now the feelings apparently are shared by much of the rest of the nation.
The Field Poll showed only about a quarter of registered voters in the Golden State give the president high marks, the same number he posted in a March survey. A CBS/New York Times poll released Tuesday showed his national approval marks dipped to 29 percent.
Field Poll Director Mark DiCamillo said Democratic-leaning California has been about 10 percentage points more negative than the national electorate about the Republican president's performance.
.....
Overall, Bush is approaching Richard Nixon as the lowest-rated president in Field Poll history. Nixon dropped to 24 percent approval in 1974 in the days before he resigned amid the Watergate scandal.
Legacy my ass
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:36 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of dubya with turd-blossom after announcing his resignation.

Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
|
Tuesday, August 14, 2007
|
Putting lipstick on the pig
posted by
Clyde
11:42 AM
The Post-Rove White House
At his emotional goodbye with George W. Bush on the South lawn of the White House Monday, Karl Rove painted a portrait of a presidency made of strong vision and epochal goals. Rove, his voice trembling, said of Bush, "I've seen a man of far-sighted courage put America on a war footing and protect us against a brutal enemy in a dangerous conflict that will shape this new century. I've seen a leader respond to an economy weakened by recession, corporate scandal and terrorist attacks by taking decisive action to strengthen the economy and create jobs. I've seen a reformer who challenged his administration, the Congress and the country to make bold changes to important institutions in great need of repair."
As the country heads into the 2008 election, the public's verdict on Bush and Rove's vision may not be nearly as kind. With poll numbers stacked against the GOP nationwide, 2008 could become as great a rejection of signature Bush policies and his party as the 2006 mid-term election was. Thanks to that threat, the post-Rove White House already finds itself preoccupied with extracting itself from the shoals where Bush and Rove's grand visions have foundered. In that sense, the Bush administration has already begun repudiating the grandest ideas, and the legacy, of the man who was its chief architect.
(Never Happen)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Michael Ware explains the real reasons why violence in Iraq is down:
posted by
Wally
9:09 AM
CNN Baghdad reporter Michael Ware talked to Anderson Cooper on Monday 8/13 about how well "the surge" is working in reducing violence in Iraq. Yes, violence is down somewhat, but not because of the reasons you're being told by the chickenhawks in the Republican party.To some degree, the surge has shown some successes. But the real success Anderson, is coming from something totally different, and that is coming from America cutting deals with its former enemies - principally the Baathist insurgents, the Sunni insurgents. It's by cutting a deal with the Baath party, on the terms that the Baath party offered America 4 years ago, and had to wait for America to be battered in to submission to accept, that the tide has been turned against Al Qaeda. It's by unleashing the Baath that the Al Qaeda bombs are calming down, that the Al Qaeda attacks are starting to slow down.
By cutting these deals, the seeds are being sowed for a much broader more entrenched civil war that America will leave behind.
Don't forget, by supporting the Sunnis in the way that they are, the American administration right now is picking sides in the Civil War. Hmmmm, not just picking sides, but picking the side of the Sunnis and the Baathists. Who was the leader of the Baath party again? What ever happened to that "de-Baathification" thing that was part of the initial plan for the new free and democratic Iraq?
About Sectarian Violence:The number of bodies tortured, mutilated, victims of sectarian death squads that are showing up on the streets of Baghdad continues to rise and fall. Right now there's less than there used to be, but by less, that's still 20 tortured people showing up every morning.
Now, the numbers are down for a number of reasons. One is 2 million people have fled the country. Another 2 million are displaced internally in refugee camps. So there's simply fewer targets. And of those who remain in the capital and in the villages surrounding, they now must live in segregated communities, heavily defended by thier own militias, be they American backed Sunni militias, or Iranian backed Shia militias.
This place has been Ethnically Cleansed and segregated. So deaths are down because it's much harder to kill each other until America withdraws, and the real battle begins. As Ann Coulter said, it's going "swimmingly" - as if swimming in blood was a good thing.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
O'Reilly loses his best friends.
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
9:00 AM

Public Letter to Harold Ford, Jr., Re: The O'Reilly Factor and Free Republic
The Honorable Harold Ford, Jr. Chairman Democratic Leadership Council 600 Pennsylvania Ave., SE, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20003
Dear Rep. Ford,
I appeared with you on the O'Reilly Factor on July 31, 2007, in my capacity as spokesman for FreeRepublic.com to discuss politics on the Internet. The host, Bill O'Reilly, falsely accused FreeRepublic.com of having the following comments on its site: "Homosexuals are dogs," "I hate blacks," "Hillary Clinton should be assassinated," and "A stray bullet should kill her."
To be blunt, those comments were made up by the O'Reilly Factor.
The O'Reilly Factor was not able to provide documentation that those comments appeared on FreeRepublic.com. A request for an on air retraction and apology has been ignored.
Let me assure you that, contrary to how the O'Reilly Factor portrayed FreeRepublic.com to you and the viewing public, FreeRepublic.com is not a site where people feel comfortable posting a comment such as "I hate blacks."
As I made clear on the broadcast, those alleged comments cited by Mr. O'Reilly would be in violation of our posting guidelines and would not be tolerated by our moderators.
It is unfortunate that the O'Reilly Factor stooped to making up comments to besmirch the reputation of FreeRepublic.com in order to appear 'fair and balanced' in its campaign against the Daily Kos. Being that the O'Reilly Factor has declined to correct the record, I am writing you personally so that any misconception you have of FreeRepublic.com is cleared up.
Sincerely,
Kristinn Taylor Spokesman FreeRepublic.com
Loofah Make sure to check out the comments. Like this one:
To: kristinn
"I stopped watching The O'Reilly Factor 2-3 years ago because he's too liberal"
18 posted on 08/11/2007 2:02:03 PM PDT by American Quilter (I want Supreme Court justices who make Clarence Thomas look liberal!) [ Post Reply Private Reply To 1 View Replies ]
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Uncle Sam Wants YOU! - Bush's "war czar" says, unlike impeachment, the "Draft" is not off the table
posted by
Wally
7:51 AM
But at least this time, it would be more "fair and equitable" than it was in Vietnam.
The hugely unpopular draft was discontinued in 1973 at the end of the Vietnam War, and today the Army recruits soldiers for its all-volunteer force-10,000 in July, with a goal of 80,000 new soldiers this year-with offers ranging from a chance to win an iPod to a $20,000 bonus to sign-ups who can start basic training before October. But incentives might not be enough to supply soldiers for the increasingly unpopular wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Last week, Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute-President Bush's "war czar"-told NPR that the draft has "always been an option on the table" and that it "makes sense to certainly consider it."
Re-implementing the draft would be the job of Selective Service System, which already aggressively enforces registration by all young men between 18 and 25. With no current risk of being called up and the relative ease of adding one's name to the roles, compliance is high, but newly eligible teenagers, lax in follow-through skills, are gently reminded that "[r]efusal to register is a federal crime" punishable by a fine of $250,000 and "up to 5 years imprisonment." The form letter (below) from SSS director William Chatfield persuasively tells one 18-year old, "our objective is to register you, not to have you prosecuted."
It may be of some comfort to the recipients of such correspondence and their parents, many of whom themselves were wary of the draft during the 1960s and early 1970s, that if the draft is reinstated, it will be "more fair and equitable" than it was during most of the Vietnam War. "There would be fewer reasons to excuse a man from service."

Slate.com
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Rove is not a "boy genius"
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:45 AM
Repeat after me, Rove is not a boy genius! All I heard yesterday was Democrats being scared he'd join another campaign for the 2008 elections. Who really cares? If I were a Repuke running for prez, I certainly wouldn't want my campaign associated with Rove. He's hated as much from the left as Hillary is hated on the right. He's NOT a boy genius! Remember, Rove didn't win the 2000 election for Bush. Daddy's Supreme Court gave it to Junior. Hell, Rove didn't even win the popular vote! And look at 2004. Fraud and voter caging across the country, especially in Ohio, kept Chucklenuts in the White House. 2006? Nuff said. Rove is NOT a boy genius.
Rove leaves more second-term blues for White House
The resignation of Karl Rove, architect of President George W. Bush's election triumphs and a crucial behind-the-scenes policy guru, is the latest sign of the White House's diminished agenda and shattered dreams of a Republican super-majority, analysts said.
Rove, the last and most prominent of Bush's inner circle of Texas advisers to quit the administration, leaves a lame-duck president suffering from low approval ratings, an unpopular war in Iraq and public rejection in the 2006 elections.
With Democrats in control of Congress and brimming with optimism about the 2008 White House race, Rove's talk of a lasting and historic shift to Republican dominance seems long ago.
"This closes the chapter where George Bush and Karl Rove thought they were building a new Republican majority that would last a generation. That is clearly off the table," said Cal Jillson, a political analyst at Southern Methodist University in Dallas.
"At this point all they are trying to do is save some of the signature items from their first term and hand off the war in Iraq to the next guy in better shape than it looks today," Jillson said.
Loser
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Monday, August 13, 2007
|
George takes another step towards Absolute Monarchy: tells courts that Warrantless Eavesdropping Can Not Be Questioned
posted by
Wally
2:02 PM
The Bush administration said Monday the constitutionality of its warrantless electronic eavesdropping program cannot be challenged.
Read that again: The Bush administration said Monday the constitutionality of its warrantless electronic eavesdropping program cannot be challenged.
Excuse me George, but according to the Constitution, everything can be challenged. That's why we have the Constitution.
You don't have to guess what the White House's rationale is for this latest ham-handed dismissal of the Separation of Powers and the Rights guaranteed by the Constitution. You know it already: National Security. As if those two words trump everything else, including the actual Security of the Nation. Two senior Justice Department officials, speaking on condition of anonymity in a teleconference with reporters, reiterated the administration's position that it was invoking the so-called "state secrets privilege" in arguing that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals must dismiss the cases because they threaten to expose information authorities say is essential to the nation's security.
"The case cannot be litigated in light of the national security interest involved," one official said.
The officials spoke on the condition that their names would not be published because, they said, it was the government's protocol not to comment on pending litigation. Not only are they saying that the Judicial Branch isn't allowed to judge whether or not illegal wiretapping violates the Constitution. They are also saying that they can't tell anyone who said they can't rule on this. By that logic, the administration can do literally ANYTHING, and never ever ever be held accountable, or even have it revealed that they ever did it. Ever. To anyone. Even the other branches of government.
If that's what they call national security, then our nation is frighteningly, desperately, insanely insecure.
Shhh. It's a secret
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
He's not being frog-marched, but at least Rove is leaving
posted by
Wally
7:20 AM
Karl Rove, the political adviser who masterminded President George W. Bush's two winning presidential campaigns, is resigning, the White House confirmed today.
In an interview published this morning in The Wall Street Journal, Mr. Rove said, "I just think it's time," adding, "There's always something that can keep you here, and as much as I'd like to be here, I've got to do this for the sake of my family." Turdblossom has a family? Maybe his wife told him to stop hanging around with all the perverts in the GOP. Or maybe it just hasn't been the same since they cut off Jeff Gannon's White House accessMr. Rove said he had first considered leaving a year ago but stayed after his party lost the crucial midterm elections last fall, putting Congress in Democratic hands, and Mr. Bush's problems mounted in Iraq and in his pursuit of a new immigration policy.
Ms. Perino said Mr. Rove would leave at the end of August. Which brings up the obvious question: Who's campaign is he going to join?
Buh Bye Karl
Permalink
::
5 comments
::
|
|
Dick Cheney '94: Invading Baghdad Would Create Quagmire
posted by
Wally
7:14 AM
In this interview from April 15th, 1994, Dick Cheney reveals the reasons why invading Baghdad and toppling Saddam Hussein wouldn't be a great idea. He also stipulates that "not very many" American soldiers' lives were worth losing to take out Saddam during the Gulf War.
Q: Do you think the U.S. or U.N. forces should have moved into Baghdad?
Cheney: No.
Q: Why not?
Cheney: Because if we'd gone to Baghdad we would have been all alone. There wouldn't have been anybody else with us. It would have been a U.S. occupation of Iraq. None of the Arab forces that were willing to fight with us in Kuwait were willing to invade Iraq.
Once you got to Iraq and took it over, and took down Saddam Hussein's government, then what are you going to put in its place? That's a very volatile part of the world, and if you take down the central government of Iraq, you can easily end up seeing pieces of Iraq fly off. Part of it the Syrians would like to have to the west. Part of eastern Iraq the Iranians would like to claim - fought over for eight years. In the north you've got the Kurds, and if the Kurds spin loose and join with the Kurds in Turkey then you threaten the territorial integrity of Turkey.
It's a, it's a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq.
The other thing was casualties. Everyone was impressed with the fact we were able to do our job with as few casualties as we had. But for the 146 Americans killed in action, and for their families it wasn't a cheap war. And the question for the president in terms of whether or not we went on to Baghdad and take additional casualties in an effort to get Saddam Hussein was how many additional dead Americans is Saddam worth? Our judgment was, not very many, and I think we got it right. You did get it right, Dick. The first time. So what's with the flip flop, Dick? Why the change of heart? And why the big push to invade Iran lately? Haven't you done enough damage to this country? Or are you truly just stark raging batshiat insane?
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:37 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of dubya and turd-blossom

Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
|
Sunday, August 12, 2007
|
The army that wasn't
posted by
Clyde
6:14 AM
Iraq contractors accused in shootings
There are now nearly as many private contractors in Iraq as there are U.S. soldiers - and a large percentage of them are private security guards equipped with automatic weapons, body armor, helicopters and bullet-proof trucks.
They operate with little or no supervision, accountable only to the firms employing them. And as the country has plummeted toward anarchy and civil war, this private army has been accused of indiscriminately firing at American and Iraqi troops, and of shooting to death an unknown number of Iraqi citizens who got too close to their heavily armed convoys.
Not one has faced charges or prosecution.
There is great confusion among legal experts and military officials about what laws - if any - apply to Americans in this force of at least 48,000.
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Woohoo... We're #42!
posted by
Clyde
6:09 AM
US slipping in life expectancy rankings
Americans are living longer than ever, but not as long as people in 41 other countries.
For decades, the United States has been slipping in international rankings of life expectancy, as other countries improve health care, nutrition and lifestyles.
Countries that surpass the U.S. include Japan and most of Europe, as well as Jordan, Guam and the Cayman Islands.
"Something's wrong here when one of the richest countries in the world, the one that spends the most on health care, is not able to keep up with other countries," said Dr. Christopher Murray, head of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington.
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Saturday, August 11, 2007
|
But... but... they're making progress!
posted by
Clyde
6:11 AM
Howard warns Maliki: act or face pullout
JOHN Howard has demanded the Iraqi Government make faster progress towards resolving the country's political differences or face the prospect of a withdrawal of Australian troops and those of other Western nations.
The Prime Minister, in a blunt letter to his Iraqi counterpart Nouri al-Maliki, urges the Iraqi Government to speed the sharing of oil wealth among all sections of the Iraqi community, including the minority Sunni population.
In the letter, sent last week, MrHoward warns that if the Iraqis fail to make progress, the public support for Australia's military deployment to Iraq may not be sustainable.
The clear implication in Mr Howard's letter is that US public support would also falter without signs of substantial political progress in Iraq.
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Say it ain't so, a liar in the White House?
posted by
Clyde
6:05 AM
Ex-White House writer accused of taking undue credit
He has been hailed as the best White House speechwriter since Theodore Sorensen, the muse behind President Bush's most famous phrases. But now Michael Gerson is accused by a former colleague of taking credit for words he did not write.
According to Matthew Scully, who worked with him for five years, Gerson is a "self-publicizing" glory hog guilty of "foolish vanity," "sheer pettiness" and "credit hounding."
In Scully's account, Gerson did not come up with the language that made him famous. "Few lines of note were written by Mike," Scully says, "and none at all that come to mind from the post-9/11 addresses - not even 'axis of evil.' "
Scully's blistering portrait of one of the president's most prominent former advisers in the new issue of the Atlantic touched off an intense pushback by the White House Friday as top Bush aides jumped to defend Gerson.
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Friday, August 10, 2007
|
Just because the new wiretapping law makes it "legal", it still doesn't change the Constitution
posted by
Wally
7:41 AM
For the past several years, at least since 9/11, the Bush administration has been performing warrantless wiretaps on American citizens, in direct violation of the FISA law and the 4th Amendment of the Constitution. . Last weekend Congress handed Bush what looks like a "Get Out Of Jail Free" card in the form of the new surveillance law, stating, for the first time in the history of our nation, that illegal search (wiretapping and email monitoring) is legal. Now Bush is claiming that the law is retroactive, making his years of lawbreaking go away. One small problem - that Damn Piece Of Paper.Four days after President Bush signed controversial legislation legalizing some warrantless surveillance of Americans, the administration is citing the law in a surprise motion today urging a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the NSA spy program.
The lawsuit was brought by lawyers defending Guantanamo Bay prisoners. The lawyers and others alleged the threat of surveillance is chilling their First Amendment rights of speech, and their clients' right to legal representation.
The Center for Constitutional Rights, the plaintiff in the lawsuit, is expected to argue today that the new law violates the Fourth Amendment's requirement that judges approve warrants for surveillance.
"Congress has ceded further power to an administration that has done nothing but abuse its power and betray the trust of the American people, center attorney Shayana Kadidal said. "Congress has given the president and attorney general virtually unchecked power to spy on international calls of Americans without any oversight or accountability from the courts." Just because the Democrats are complicit with the Republicans in trying to dismantle our Constitutional rights, this is still a country of laws, not men. If we can't find someone within the government to uphold and defend our Constitution, eventually things will reach a point where we'll do it ourselves, as has happened in the past (abolitionism, suffrage, civil rights, Boston Tea Party, etc). Just because the new law says it's no longer illegal, it doesn't mean it's no longer unconstitutional. It just means the law is bad. And it certainly doesn't mean it's the right thing to do.
Laws don't apply to King George
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Normally we avoid playing along with the "horserace", but in this case...
posted by
Wally
6:30 AM
Obama is running third in the polls in Iowa.... In the Republican primary
Perhaps most surprising of all, Obama actually finished third as the preferred general election candidate of registered Republicans, at 6.7 percent, behind Romney (21.8 percent), and Giuliani (10 percent), but ahead of Thompson (5.2 percent) and McCain (1.8 percent).
In a sign that Iowa Republicans are not happy with their field of presidential candidates, 31.1 percent declared themselves undecided, topping even Romney's total. "I think it isn't that it's unexpected, but we certainly believe that the Republicans are considerably more discontented than the Democrats," Redlawsk said. "And it's harder to find people who say they're planning to attend the Republican caucuses ... Republicans seem much less mobilized and more discontented."
"We look also at how satisfied people are with their choice, and 16.1 percent of Republicans said they were very satisfied," Redlawsk said. In contrast, 40.1 percent of Democrats said they were very satisfied. We can't wait to see how Karl Rove and FoxNews is going to spin this one.
For once, it's NOT Clinton's fault
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:26 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption

Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
|
Thursday, August 9, 2007
|
Hallelujah!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:16 PM
Can you say LANDSLIDE 2008?
Poll: Republicans starting to stand by Bush again

President Bush's approval rating has gone up slightly since his all-time low in June, according to a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll released Thursday.
Bush's approval rating in the latest poll was 36 percent, an increase from 32 percent in June. But CNN Polling Director Keating Holland explained that the improvement is entirely due to Republicans turning around and deciding to stand by their president.
"The gain in Bush's approval is due entirely to Republicans coming home," Holland said. "There was no change in the approval rating among Democrats or Independents between this poll and the last one, but Bush's approval rating went up 16 points among Republicans since June."
Lord Bush!
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
I wonder if they'll have Freedom Fries?
posted by
Wally
9:20 AM
Bush is going to flip-flop and try to break through the hostility and use his vast diplomatic skills and experience to try to forge an alliance with those evil and treacherous surrender-monkey French this weekend.
President George W. Bush and French President Nicolas Sarkozy, vacationing within miles (km) of each other in New England, will have lunch on Saturday, opening what the White House called a new era in relations between the two countries.
(snip)
"I'm sure he'll talk about some international matters, but this is not a summit, this is not something with an agenda. The agenda is come by and let's visit," Snow said. Looks like I was wrong about that diplomacy or alliance thing. I should have known
"It looks like we're on the verge of a new era of relations with the French, which is a good thing," Snow said. Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't we had "relations with the French" for some time now? Weren't they part of the coalition of the Allies in that little unpleasantness in the early part of the last century in Europe, against the original Axis? Before that, didn't the "era of relations" include being part of the Entente Powers in "The War to End All Wars"?
Even before that, didn't our "era of relations" with the French go back even further, when they helped us out with a little skirmish - of some significance from what I've been told - when we were, in fact, "fighting them here" instead of over there. What was that called again.... oh yeah, the frikking Revolutionary War.
"New era of relations" with the French my ass. 
Freedom Fries For Everybody!
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Dad?
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:04 AM
First lady, Jenna to write children's book

First lady Laura Bush and daughter Jenna Bush are writing a children's book about a boy who doesn't like to read. It is based on their experiences as teachers.
.....
She says the book is set in a school - somewhat like the Miss Nelson series by Harry Allard and James Marshall - and is about a funny, mischievous second-grader "who professes not to like books. He says he likes real things. Of course, what everyone who loves books knows is that even a fantastical character can become very real to a reader."
Bin Laden Determined To Strike In U.S.
Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
Republican priorities: Veto Children's Healthcare, Half-trillion for Iraq, More Tax Cuts for Corporations
posted by
Wally
7:35 AM
How does he sleep at night? While threatening to veto a bill to help provide health insurance for children at risk (uninsured and underinsured), because it would be "too expensive" (what is the cost of sick or dying kids?), while asking for more and more money for his little mis-adventures in the Middle East, he is now asking for more tax breaks... not for the working class struggling to put food on their families. Not for those "uniquely American" people working three jobs to try to make ends meet. Not even for upper middle class white collar workers who are hoping their jobs don't get outsourced to India so they have to become "uniquely American" to be able to pay their mortgage and health insurance for their kids.
Nope, Bush wants more tax cuts for the ones he truly cares about - Corporations. President Bush said Wednesday that he is considering a fresh plan to cut tax rates for U.S. corporations to make them more competitive around the world, an initiative that could further inflame a battle with the Democratic Congress over spending and taxes and help define the remainder of his tenure.
Advisers presented Bush with a series of ideas to restructure corporate taxes, possibly eliminating narrowly targeted breaks to pay for a broader, across-the-board rate cut. In an interview with a small group of journalists afterward, Bush said he was "inclined" to send a corporate tax package to Congress, although he expressed uncertainty about its political viability.
Democrats quickly returned fire, noting that Bush inherited a surplus that turned into a deficit and that he never vetoed a spending bill during the six years that Republicans controlled Capitol Hill, even as the budget grew 50 percent. The Haves and Have-Mores
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Wednesday, August 8, 2007
|
"Privatized" healthcare system is leaving some children behind
posted by
Wally
1:07 PM
Bush and the Republicans are so fond of the phrase "No Child Left Behind" that you can hardly get through an interview or press release from one of them without hearing that mantra at least once. Yet, when it comes to health care, that phrase seems to be conspicuously absent from their vocabulary.
Just last week Bush was threatening to veto a children's health insurance bill because "it would be too expensive and would constitute a first step toward government-funded universal health coverage." He simply refuses to adequately fund public health initiatives for anyone, even children.
Now, according to a study published in the Aug. 8 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, even children who's parents pay for health insurance for them are often unable to get the vaccines they need to prevent many easily preventable childhood illnesses.Thanks to an increasingly complex coverage system, many U.S. kids who are privately insured are actually having more trouble getting recommended vaccines than kids who have no insurance at all, experts say.
"We need to be able to support the public sector safety net so these children have some place to go, because right now, they have nowhere to go," said lead researcher Dr. Grace M. Lee, assistant professor of ambulatory care and prevention and pediatrics at Harvard Medical School, Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care.
Children with private health insurance often have plans that don't cover all the recommended vaccines, or the vaccine may be covered but not its administration.
In 2000, an estimated 14 percent of children aged 0 to 17 were underinsured in the United States, according to background information in the study. These children may be referred to public health clinics, but now, it seems, those clinics are no longer able to provide the needed vaccines. If your insurance won't even pay to have your kid immunized to help prevent them from getting sick, do you think they'll be willing to pay for needed (but expensive) treatments when they do?
I personally spend over $8,000 a year on insurance for myself and my wife (medical, dental, pharmaceutical), taken out of my paycheck. And that is subsidized through work. And I don't have kids. And I have an HMO, so who knows if that will pay for the care I need when it comes time that I need it.
The Republicans talk about not wanting to raise taxes to pay for healthcare, and how expensive it would be. Guess what, I pay 800 a year for Medicare, on top of my own private insurance premiums. I can't believe that expanding Medicare to cover everyone would cost 10 times as much. Even if it did, the 8 grand taken out of my paycheck every year in taxes to pay for Medicare for everyone would be exactly as painful as the 8 grand I pay for my own private insurance. Except then I wouldn't have to pay deductibles or co-pays on top of it. Plus, I'd be supporting the medical care of the entire community of man, and not just selfishly taking care of myself.
Like Michael Moore so aptly demonstrates in his movie Sicko, our Privatized health care system is horribly broken. And even the insured children are being left behind.
No Child Left Behind
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
"Surge of Support" for the troops, Romney style
posted by
Wally
10:08 AM
While our troops are sweltering in 130 degree heat, wearing body armor and helmets, lugging heavy packs and weaponry all over the desert halfway around the world, Mitt Romney (R-MA) and his five military aged sons are serving the country in their own special way.The former Massachusetts governor said his sons were showing their support for the country by "helping get me elected."
Romney, who did not serve in Vietnam due to his Mormon missionary work and a high draft lottery number, was posed the question by an anti-war activist after a speech in which Romney saluted a uniformed soldier in the crowd and called for donations to military support organizations.
Romney's five sons range in age from 37 to 26 and have worked as real estate developers, sports marketers and advertising executives. They are now actively campaigning for their father and have a "Five Brothers" blog on Romney's campaign Web site.
Romney noted that his middle son, 36-year-old Josh, was completing a recreational vehicle tour of all 99 Iowa counties on Wednesday and said, "I respect that and respect all those and the way they serve this great country." Give his kid a weapon, put him in a HumVee instead of an RV, and let him tour the provinces of Iraq instead of Iowa for a tour or three.
Republicans Love War, for other people...
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
"He was just, like, "Nope,'"
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:51 AM
Bridge hero turns down photo opportunity with Bush

Among the dozens of wrenching accounts to come out of the collapse of the Interstate 35W bridge in Minneapolis, the actions of 20-year-old Jeremy Hernandez were a bright spot: Trapped in a tipping school bus with 50 children, he kicked open the back door and began helping them one by one to safety.
Within a day, news outlets across the country were repeating the story of the school bus, along with a sad footnote - that Mr. Hernandez had recently been forced to drop out of an automotive repair program because he could not afford the $15,000 tuition.
That has changed. On Saturday, Mr. Hernandez learned that Dunwoody College of Technology had offered him a full scholarship toward a degree in applied science. He has also received offers of help from dozens of strangers across the country, said Molly Schwartz, communications director for Pillsbury United Communities, which employed him as a gym coordinator for one of its summer programs.
Mr. Hernandez was not available to comment on the offer; Ms. Schwartz said he left town for northern Minnesota late on Friday, overwhelmed by the attention and concerned that his co-workers were being overlooked. He spent the weekend fishing. When President Bush's staff contacted him to request a photo opportunity, "He was just, like, 'Nope,' " she said.
George Bush doesn't care about bridge collapses!
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Another one.....!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:27 AM
Young Republicans Head Resigns In Gay Sex Scandal

Glenn Murphy, 33, the newly-elected chairman of the Young Republicans National Federation, who is well known for using the gay marriage issue to promote his candidates, has abruptly resigned amid allegations that he sexually assaulted a 22-year old man at the home of the man's sister. Murphy has already been scrubbed from the YRNF's website and their Wikipedia entry, which is now protected from edits. Jessica Colon is now listed as their chair. Murphy has also resigned as chair of Indiana's Clark County Republican Party.
Responding on the blog Taking Down Words, Murphy's lawyer contends that he has not been arrested or charged with any crime. According to the lawyer, Murphy says what happened was between "two consenting adults." Yet, the police report has already been leaked. Advance In Indiana reports:
In a shocking police report filed by the Clark Co. Sheriff's office, Murphy is accused of sexually assaulting another man on Saturday, July 28, 2007, while he lay sleeping in his bed. The alleged assault of the 22-year-old man took place in the Jeffersonville, Indiana home of his sister following a Young Republican party in which both Murphy and the 22-year-old man had been in attendance. The victim's sister had urged both men to spend the night at her home because of the amount of alcohol the two had consumed during the party. The victim awoke in the morning to find Murphy performing oral sex on him according to the report. When the victim was asked what Murphy had been doing, he responded: "He was holding my dick with one hand and sucking my dick with his mouth." The victim then pushed Murphy away, gathered his personal belongings and left. Murphy was later confronted with the charges by the victim's sister according to the report. The sister says Murphy admitted to her that he performed the sex act on her brother. Taking Down Words reports Murphy is being charged with criminal deviate conduct, a Class B felony. The police report also notes that Murphy was accused of committing a very similar act on another man back in 1998. It is unclear why Murphy was not prosecuted for the 1998 incident.
It appears that Murphy was speaking more literally than anyone suspected when he was sworn in as President of the Young Republicans last month and said "I will essentially be the mouthpiece and effective leader for the tens of thousands of Young Republicans, 18 to 40, across the country."
Are there any Republican's that aren't hypocritical perverts?
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
This man now has more balls than the entire Democratic party
posted by
Wally
7:13 AM
And it took steroids for him to get the third one.
Matt Murphy of New York caught Barry Bonds' record setting 756th* home run Tuesday night.
After this past weekend, with the Democratically controlled Congress caving in to the boy king and handing unlimited and unfettered power to the Bush administration, it's obvious that there aren't three balls on the Democratic side of the aisle in both houses of Congress combined.

Congratulations Matt. Don't suppose you want to run for office?
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:32 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of dubya with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Laura at Camp David

Permalink
::
6 comments
::
|
|
|
Tuesday, August 7, 2007
|
This is what they're calling "Oversight" nowadays
posted by
Wally
1:59 PM
Under the new expanded warrantless wiretapping program, Alberto Gonzales and National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell will be responsible for writing up the procedures and determining who's phone calls and emails they're going to listen to and read. Does that make you feel more secure and safe from terrorists? Yeah, me neither.
But wait, it gets better.
Guess who's in charge of oversight to make sure that they comply with the very limited restrictions - making sure that they don't overstep their legal bounds and violate your Constitutional rights. Surprise! It's Alberto Gonzales and National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell!
That's right, the same guys who have been consistently and blatantly violating those very Constitutional rights when it was still illegal are now going to be monitoring themselves to make sure they don't continue to do so now that Congress has made it legal.The law, signed Sunday by President Bush after being pushed through the Senate and House over the weekend, does not contain provisions for outside oversight -- unlike an earlier House measure that called for audits every 60 days by the Justice Department's inspector general.
In a conference call with reporters yesterday, officials familiar with the program said they had not worked out all the details of internal oversight, noting that the law was only a day old. But the officials, who spoke to reporters on the condition that they not be identified, said surveillance activities would require a sworn certificate and affidavit, which would be reviewed for accuracy by inspectors general from the Justice Department or intelligence agencies.
It is left to the director of national intelligence and the attorney general to "assess compliance with such procedures" and report their assessments to the House and Senate intelligence panels, the statute states.
Gonzalez is also required to provide semiannual reports to the House and Senate intelligence and Judiciary committees, which are to include any accounts of abuse or noncompliance that Justice and intelligence officials discover in their internal reviews. Please. I can only imagine his semiannual reports. "I can't recall any instances where I violated this particular statute. Talk to you in 6 months."
Next time I get pulled over, I wonder what the cop would do if I told him that the head of DOJ says it's okay to monitor himself, so just give me your badge number and I'll send a report in 6 months telling you all the times I drove over the speed limit or didn't come to a complete stop at a stop sign. Then I'll tell my boss that I'm going to monitor and assess my compliance with regular work hours, and give a semi-annual report on how many times I was late, and assess my productivity and decide my own raise.
I'll let you know how that works out for me. Meantime, I'll be accepting donations for bail money to get my butt out of jail, since unlike the criminals in high office in this country, as a simple law abiding working class regular guy, I'll have the benefit of neither "executive privilege" nor gainful employment.
Letting the fox guard the henhouse
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Supporting the troops: Female airman charged after refusing to testify in her rape case
posted by
Wally
1:27 PM
A court-martial is scheduled next month for a female airman who said she was charged after she declined to testify against three men she accused of rape.
The woman is charged with one count of committing indecent acts and one count of consuming alcohol as a minor. The military declined to identify the men or confirm whether they were ever charged because the case in pending, said base spokesman Ed Drohan.
In her letter, the woman said she was partially clothed when she fled the room May 13, 2006. She said she reported the incident and was given a medical examination.
She said the three male airmen were charged with rape, but the charges were dropped after she refused to testify. So let me get this straight. She was in her room, serving her country, carrying out her duty like a good American when three guys attack her. Instead of going after her assailants for their criminal behavior, and to prevent other women from facing the same ordeal, the Air Force harrassed and intimidated her to prevent her from testifying against them. Now she's the one being charged with a crime, facing time in prison, and having to register as a sex offender for running away from them and trying to escape being raped? Was she just supposed to lay there and take it? Hey Air Force, why don't you just fucking stone her to death like they do in Iran? Air Force: "Do Something Amazing"
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Jack Cafferty on the new wiretapping law
posted by
Wally
10:11 AM
"I am less afraid of a terrorist attack than I am of my own government"
On the Cafferty File, Jack has plenty to say, none of it good, about the new warrantless wiretapping bill the Dems passed over the weekend - and about the Democratically controlled Congress who passed the bill.
The Question of the Hour: "Should Congress have expanded the Bush administration's authority to eavesdrop without warrants?"
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Another high ranking Republican caught leaking classified info for political purposes
posted by
Wally
9:24 AM
CREW FILES DOJ COMPLAINT AGAINST MIN. LEADER BOEHNER FOR ALLEGED ILLEGAL LEAK OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION
Today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a complaint with the Department of Justice asking that the Counterespionage Section of the National Security Division initiate an investigation into whether House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-OH) violated the law by leaking classified information.
In a July 31, 2007 interview with Fox News anchor Neil Cavuto, Rep. Boehner disclosed an aspect of a Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court's decision regarding warrantless wiretapping, stating:There's been a ruling, over the last four or five months, that prohibits the ability of our intelligence services and our counterintelligence people from listening in to two terrorists in other parts of the world where the communication could come through the United States. Rep. Boehner apparently made his remarks to Mr. Cavuto in an effort to blame Democrats for failing to pass legislation overriding the court's decision, stating: "The Democrats have known about this for months. We have had private conversations, we have had public conversations that this needs to be fixed. And Republicans are not going to leave this week until this problem is addressed."
Notably, Minority Leader Boehner has previously expressed strong concerns over illegal leaks for political gain. In discussing a long-running court case regarding an illegally intercepted phone call that Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA) released to the media, Rep. Boehner stated: "When you break the law in pursuit of a political opponent, you've gone too far. Members of Congress have a responsibility not only to obey the laws of the country and the rules of our institution, but also to defend the integrity of those laws and rules when they are violated." Theoretically, he could be facing 10 years. But really, will anything come of it?
Don't bet on it. Gonzales will refuse to investigate or prosecute for "national security" reasons - which is counterintuitive and irrational, seeing as this was a leak of classified national defense information. If an investigation does take place, either in the DOJ or Congress, Bush will say Boehner can't talk because of "executive privilege", which is again irrational since Boehner is clearly not in the executive branch. But then, logic and reason have never been the strong suits of this administration. Politics trumps everything, and this was their man making political points, and that means whatever he did, no matter how illegal, is okay.
It's okay when Republicans do it
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Ron Paul is more popular than Dubya
posted by
Wally
8:52 AM
...according to Google Trends!

Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Minneapolis school bus hero - Jeremy Hernandez
posted by
Wally
6:16 AM
On Monday, our "Caption This" picture showed Dim Son walking with Gary Babineau one of the heroes of the Minneapolis bridge collapse. We received this clarification from one of our regular readers. Saw your picture of George with Gary Babineau. He was certainly part of getting the kids off the bridge and there were many, many ordinary heroes that day, but another young man was the one responsible for getting the kids off the bus (which was sitting next to a semi engulfed in flames). So why didn't George choose that young man for his photo-op? Could it be that he's Hispanic? Why yes, I do believe it could be. George is a schmuck. (I also can't believe he took the opportunity to take a partisan swipe at the Democrats while he was here.)
Here's his story: Saved by hero, and by seconds 
While the president may not recognize Jeremy Hernandez, many others have stepped up to show their gratitude: Dunwoody College offers rescuer chance to resume studies for free
Jenna Minneapolis Thanks for the clarification Jenna, and for keeping us honest. As for the inappropriately timed partisan swipe? It's dubya. I would have been more surprised if he didn't try to blame it on the Democrats.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Monday, August 6, 2007
|
Iraq's increasingly inappropriately named "Unity Government" loses 4 more members
posted by
Wally
2:44 PM
Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's unity government plunged deeper into crisis on Monday when four secularist ministers withdrew from cabinet meetings, less than a week after the main Sunni Arab bloc quit.
A total of 17 ministers, nearly half of Maliki's cabinet, have now quit or are boycotting meetings at a time when he is under growing pressure from frustrated U.S. officials to make demonstrable progress in reconciling Iraq's warring sects.
The cabinet boycott means Maliki sets off on Tuesday for visits to Turkey and Iran this week, with signs he is losing control of his government back home. Unity?
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
FBI raids home of the man who exposed Bush's illegal wiretapping
posted by
Wally
2:02 PM
In a strangely timed coincidence, while the Democratically controlled Congress was jockeying for position, seeing who could press their nose more firmly between George Bush's buttcheeks by giving him even more power for his unconstitutional domestic spy programs, the FBI was busy taking advantage of it's already unfettered surveillance authority.FBI agents searched the home of a former Justice Department lawyer last week in an effort to determine who leaked details of the warrantless eavesdropping program to the news media, Newsweek magazine reported yesterday, citing two anonymous legal sources.
The agents, who had obtained a classified search warrant, took Thomas Tamm's desktop computer, two laptops belonging to his children and some of Tamm's personal files, Newsweek reported. I'm sure Tamm wasn't surprised by the search. As the man who blew the whistle on the illegal wiretapping program, he had to know that he would make enemies in the highest offices of government, and that he would be the subject of intense scrutiny, if not arrest."It was a shameful act for someone to disclose this very important program in a time of war," President Bush said four days after the Times report. "The fact that we're discussing this program is helping the enemy." No George, what is helping the enemy is that our Constitution is being violated by the very people sworn to uphold and defend it. What is helping our enemies - you know, the people who "hate our freedoms" - is that our "freedoms" are being taken away. Every time another of our inalienable rights is violated, our "enemies" can claim another victory.
It is a tragic indictment on our country and our government when those who uphold and defend the law are searched, arrested and called criminals by those who break and defy it. Thomas Tamm showed tremendous courage and loyalty to his country and the principles upon which it was founded. He took a tremendous personal risk to expose the criminal activity of those in the highest levels of power. As a DOJ official, he knew the likely consequences of his actions, and yet he chose to do what was right. Remember the name Thomas Tamm. He is a true American Hero. And for that he will have to pay.
Big Brother is watching
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
My Daddy is running for President..
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:35 PM
PLEASE DON'T VOTE FOR HIM!
Rudy Giuliani's daughter is supporting Barack Obama

There's one vote that Rudy Giuliani definitely can't count on in his 2008 presidential bid: his own daughter's. According to the 17-year-old Caroline Giuliani's Facebook profile, she's supporting Barack Obama.
On her profile, she designates her political views as "liberal" and-until this morning-proclaimed her membership in the Facebook group "Barack Obama (One Million Strong for Barack)." According to her profile, she withdrew from the Obama group at 6 a.m. Monday, after Slate sent her an inquiry about it.
In what may be an effort to avoid public connection to her famous father, the future Harvard freshman and recent graduate of Trinity School in Manhattan uses a slight variation of her name on the Facebook site. But she didn't lock her profile, allowing any Facebook user with access to the Harvard or Trinity School networks (more than 42,000 people) to view her detailed profile. (As a Harvard student, I was able to see it.)
9/11
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Happy Anniversary PDB!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:11 PM
On this day six years ago, Bush ignored "Bin Laden Determined To Strike In US." Instead of capturing the the man responsible, Bush would rather wiretap John Q. Public here at home:

UPDATE: As an anniversary present, an American born member of Al Qaeda sent us a new movie, warning of attacks on U.S. diplomats and embassies, calling them "spy-dens"."We shall continue to target you, at home and abroad, just as you target us, at home and abroad, and these spy dens and military command and control centers from which you plotted your aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq," said Adam Gadahn, a Californian also known as Azzan al-Amriki. I wonder if Bush will ignore this one too?
Who could have predicted...
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Another hero outed by Bushco - Abu Ghraib whistleblower was exposed, on TV, by Rummy
posted by
Wally
10:34 AM
The US soldier who exposed the abuse of Iraqi prisoners in Abu Ghraib prison found himself a marked man after his anonymity was blown in the most astonishing way by Donald Rumsfeld.
After seeing the pictures of what was going on in Abu Ghraib, Joe Darby agonized for weeks over what to do. He knew what he "should" do, but he was concerned about retribution from those involved as well as other soldiers. Finally, given promises of anonymity, he worked up the courage to do the right thing and turn in the photos. It was a ballsy move. He knew he could face serious backlash for betraying fellow soldiers, but at least he had that promise of anonymity.And then he was sitting in a crowded Iraqi canteen with hundreds of soldiers and Donald Rumsfeld came on the television to thank Joe Darby by name for handing in the photographs. So much for anonymity. Like most any reasonable person, Joe doesn't believe it was an accident or a slip of the tongue. I'm guessing that Rummy was hoping he'd be "accidentally mistaken for an enemy" and fragged, just like Tillman was after he started mouthing off about the war.Rather than turn on him for betraying colleagues, most of the soldiers in his unit shook his hand. It was at home where the real trouble started.
Mr Darby and his family have moved to a new town. They have new jobs. They have done everything but change their identities. But thanks to Rumsfeld, for doing their sworn duty as a good soldier, he was stabbed in the back. Another example of how Bush and his administration....
...supports the troops
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Clyde busts falafel-Bill lying about hate-speech
posted by
Wally
10:06 AM
With his accusations and assertions becoming more and more comical, if not insane, the self-delusional loofah-lothario's credibility has reached Homeric levels (that's Homer Simpson, not the Greek Poet). Bill O'Reilly has become little more than a caracature of himself and of the right-wing, "I'm-right-and-everyone-who-disagrees-is-a-terrorist", "shouting-opinions-and-insults-equals-journalism" bullying personality that the right wing likes to call "journalist".
Recently Bill-o went after the DailyKos, accusing them of supporting "hate-speech" because some of the comments that people post on that site are (gasp) anti-Bush and anti-Republican. Of course, in his typical "alternate reality" mode, he denies that there is anything resembling hate-speech on right wing websites.
Frequent readers of dubyaD40 might have seen the results of Clyde's occasional forays into the festering bowel that is freerepublic.com - so we're witness to the reasoned, intelligent, fair and balanced banter that is the hallmark of rightwing Bushie loyalists. Today, Clyde puts their tolerance and love to music. Enjoy.
One of the greatest fears of Clyde, Dookie, and I is that Mighty Mouth Bill-o might someday come after us. Please spare us Bill. We couldn't stand the heartbreak of being told to "shut up" by the wise and powerful Bill O'Reilly.
What a jackass.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Surge 2.0
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
10:02 AM
12,000 more Guard troops may be going to Iraq
WASHINGTON - Coming on the heels of a controversial "surge" of 21,000 U.S. troops that has stretched the Army thin, the Defense Department is preparing to send an additional 12,000 National Guard combat forces to Iraq and Afghanistan, defense officials told NBC News on Thursday.
The troops will come from four Guard combat brigades in different states, the officials told NBC News' chief Pentagon correspondent, Jim Miklaszewski. They said papers ordering the deployment, which would run for one year beginning in early 2008, were awaiting Defense Secretary Robert Gates' signature.
The deployment is sure to ignite a firestorm on Capitol Hill, where Democrats in Congress are maneuvering to scale back the U.S. commitment in Iraq. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., is pushing a proposal to end most spending on the war in 2008, limiting it to targeted operations against al-Qaida, training for Iraqi troops and protection for U.S. forces.
"I think this was all concealed until we got through the election," said retired Army Gen. Barry McCaffrey, a military analyst for NBC News. "There's no way to sustain the current rate of deployments without calling up probably nine National Guard brigades in the coming year for involuntary second tours."
Meat Grinder 
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Pussy Dems in Congress Again Cave to Bush - Make His Illegal Spying Programs Legal
posted by
Wally
7:46 AM
Remember the controversy surrounding Bush's illegal warrantless wiretapping of U.S. citizens? Remember the outrage at finding out that Bush and Gonzales were breaking the law by bypassing or ignoring FISA and the courts, and secretly spying on anyone he deemed a threat (i.e. anyone he didn't like for whatever reason)? Remember how irate we were that aside from a small handful of players, the Democrats in Congress weren't doing anything about it?
Well, you can forget all that. The Democrats have actually done something to address the illegal wiretapping that's been going on. They made it legal.US intelligence agencies will no longer need a warrant to eavesdrop on US citizens' international phone calls and emails after George Bush signed a temporary surveillance bill yesterday.
The law, which was approved by the Senate and the House of Representatives just before Congress adjourned for the summer, had been made a priority by Mr Bush and his chief intelligence officials. Guardian It wasn't enough that they could already listen in on anyone they wanted, and had 72 hours to retro-actively get a warrant from a rubber-stamp court that almost never turned down a request. It wasn't enough that the administration was violating even this already overly permissive law with secret domestic spy programs (the ones that Alberto Gonzales wasn't talking about, and wasn't able to talk about, thereby not perjuring himself when he didn't lie under oath about them because he wasn't talking about them). Bush wants total access to, and total control over everything, and the Democrats in Congress are all to happy to give it to him.
Some tidbits about the new law that you might find interesting:Intelligence agencies will no longer need a warrant to collect communications between the United States and overseas, including the conversations of Americans, so long as the intelligence investigation is directed at a person believed to be outside the U.S. The conversation does not have to be about terrorism, just a matter of foreign intelligence interest.
The administration has said its intent is not to collect information on Americans. But critics say intelligence agencies are only required to delete Americans' private information from their records if it is deemed not relevant to the investigation.
A little-noticed provision in the new law also suggests that warrantless physical searches of homes and businesses inside the United States may be allowed if the investigation concerns a foreign target of an intelligence investigation, a congressional aide said. Baltimore Sun Fortunately, the Dems won one concession. Bush wanted Gonzo to make the call on who gets spied on and who doesn't. The dems, in a stroke of obviousness, deemed that he's not trustworthy enough, so insisted that both he and the Director of National Security (another Bush thug) make the decision. Big victory there. Yippee.
Also, the bill expires in 6 months, just in time for campaign primary season - just in time for the Dems up for election to show us if it's time to vote their asses out of office.
Of course, now that the bill she allowed to pass has been signed into law, Nancy Pelosi is talking tough about changing it."Many provisions of this legislation are unacceptable, and although the bill has a six month sunset clause, I do not believe the American people will want to wait that long before corrective action is taken." Congressional Quarterly Hey Nancy, quick question: who's in charge of Congress? Specifically, who's the leader of the House? If "many provisions" were "unacceptable", why the hell did you pass it? Please step down now and let someone who will uphold their oath take your place at the House leadership.
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:27 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya with Gary Babineau, the hero that helped save the kids on the schoolbus

Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
|
Sunday, August 5, 2007
|
Shameful
posted by
Clyde
7:41 AM
Saving Soldiers' Jobs
For tens of thousands of members of the National Guard and reserves who are called up to serve in Iraq, returning home safely may be the beginning -- not the end -- of their worst nightmare. Reservists lucky enough to make it home often find their civilian jobs gone and face unsympathetic employers and a government that has restricted access to civilian job-loss reports rather than prosecuting offending employers.
The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) protects members of the guard and reserves from job loss, demotion, loss of seniority and loss of benefits when they are called to active duty.
The act is supposed to protect reservists' civilian jobs for up to five years of military service. But the government has made it difficult for veterans to enforce their legal rights. Service members who return to find their civilian jobs gone also find that the burden is on them to prove that their jobs were taken away as a result of their military service and that there is no other reason that they could have been fired.
This onerous burden of proof discourages many from filing formal complaints.
(link)
Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
Way to go George!
posted by
Clyde
7:30 AM
Another record poppy crop in Afghanistan
Afghanistan will produce another record poppy harvest this year that cements its status as the world's near-sole supplier of the heroin source, yet a furious debate over how to reverse the trend is stalling proposals to cut the crop, U.S. officials say.
As President Bush prepares for weekend talks with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, divisions within the U.S. administration and among NATO allies have delayed release of a $475 million counternarcotics program for Afghanistan, where intelligence officials see growing links between drugs and the Taliban, the officials said.
U.N. figures to be released in September are expected to show that Afghanistan's poppy production has risen up to 15 percent since 2006 and that the country now accounts for 95 percent of the world's crop, 3 percentage points more than last year, officials familiar with preliminary statistics told The Associated Press.
But counterdrug proposals by some U.S. officials have met fierce resistance, including boosting the amount of forcible poppy field destruction in provinces that grow the most, officials said. The approach also would link millions of dollars in development aid to benchmarks on eradication; arrests and prosecutions of narcotraders, corrupt officials; and on alternative crop production.
(link)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Saturday, August 4, 2007
|
Awfully stiff rules for someone who Republicans call a "paper pusher"
posted by
Clyde
6:57 AM
Ex-CIA agent Valerie Plame loses court decision Judge rules that she can't reveal the dates she worked for the spy agency in her forthcoming book.
In a setback for Valerie Plame, a federal judge ruled today that the former CIA agent cannot divulge the dates she worked for the agency in her forthcoming book, "Fair Game: My Life as a Spy, My Betrayal by the White House." The decision by U.S. District Judge Barbara S. Jones was a victory for the CIA, which had argued that such information was classified and should not be made public.
Plame was at the heart of a controversial case in which administration officials were accused of leaking news about her covert status in 2003 to several reporters after her husband, former envoy Joseph C. Wilson IV, publicly raised questions about the intelligence used to justify the U.S. invasion of Iraq.
Simon & Schuster, which is publishing Plame's memoir, said it was "disappointed in the court's ruling, which we believe runs counter to the 1st Amendment, sets a dangerous precedent and creates an unreasonable standard by which the government can disappear public information and rewrite history," according to a statement by spokesman Adam Rothberg.
The ruling by Jones came as a result of a lawsuit that the publisher and author had filed in May seeking to bar the CIA from interfering with publication of her memoir.
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Loose lips and all that crap
posted by
Clyde
6:41 AM
Officials: Boehner disclosed ruling on classified case Lawmaker says remarks on spying did not reveal anything secret
A federal intelligence court judge earlier this year secretly declared a key element of the Bush administration's wiretapping efforts illegal, according to a lawmaker and government sources, providing a previously unstated rationale for fevered efforts by lawmakers this week to expand the president's spying powers.
House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, disclosed elements of the court's decision in remarks Tuesday to Fox News as he was promoting the administration-backed wiretapping legislation. Boehner has denied revealing classified information, but two government officials privy to the details confirmed that his remarks concerned classified information.
The judge, whose name could not be learned, concluded that the government had overstepped its authority in attempting to surveil communications between two locations overseas that are passed through routing stations in the United States, according to two other government sources familiar with the decision.
The decision was both a political and practical blow to the administration, which had long held that all of the National Security Agency's enhanced surveillance efforts since 2001 were legal. The administration for years had declined to subject those efforts to the jurisdiction of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, and after it finally did so in January the court ruled that the administration's legal judgment was at least partly wrong.
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Friday, August 3, 2007
|
But it's okay when I say it!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
3:32 PM
August 3, 2007:
Bush criticises talk of US strike on Pakistan-govt
ISLAMABAD, Aug 3 (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush on Friday described the prospect of U.S. strikes against al Qaeda in Pakistan as "unsavoury", saying Washington respected its ally's sovereignty, the Pakistani government said.
Bush made the comments to Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf in a telephone call to congratulate Pakistanis ahead of the 60th anniversary of their independence on Aug. 14.
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama said this week that the United States must be willing to strike al Qaeda targets inside Pakistan.
A Pakistani foreign ministry statement said: "President Bush stated that the United States fully respected Pakistan's sovereignty and appreciated Pakistan's resolve in fighting al Qaeda and other terrorist elements. July 25th, 2007:
U.S. willing to hit terrorists inside Pakistan, officials say
Washington - Top Pentagon and State Department officials said Wednesday that U.S. special forces would enter Pakistan if they had specific intelligence about an impending terrorist strike against the United States, despite warnings from the Pakistani government that it would not accept American troops operating independently inside its borders.
The statements were the clearest assertion yet of the Bush administration's willingness to act unilaterally inside tribal areas in northwestern Pakistan where al-Qaeda's top commanders are now believed to have taken refuge. But the officials also voiced strong support for Pakistan's president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, who they said has repeatedly backed U.S. anti-terrorism efforts in the region at great political cost.
"If there were information or opportunity to strike a blow to protect the American people," U.S. forces would immediately act, Peter Verga, the acting assistant secretary of defense for international security, said during an unusual joint session held by the House Armed Services and Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Debunking this idiot is starting to bore me now. Sigh!
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Bush: I'll veto that children's health insurance bill. Senate: Suck it George
posted by
Wally
2:30 PM
In what could be a major political setback for President Bush, the Senate voted late Thursday to increase funding by $35 billion for a popular health insurance program for low-income children.
The bipartisan measure passed 68-31, with enough support from Republicans to override a promised veto by Bush.
Bush has promised to veto the legislation, saying it would be too expensive and would constitute a first step toward government-funded universal health coverage, which many Democrats support. The president and many GOP leaders prefer tax incentives to help more Americans buy coverage.
With more than 20 Republican senators up for reelection next year, it appears that the prospect of voting down a popular healthcare bill for children and facing a month of criticism from Democrats in their districts proved too daunting a challenge. Congress is scheduled to break for August recess today. Why does Bush hate the little children?
After 6 years of barely glancing at his Veto pen while the GOP was in the majority in Congress, rubber-stamping everything he said (and vice versa), it seems that old George has decided to make up for lost time, threatening to veto everything that crosses his desk.
Currently, he's threatening to veto: The above-mentioned CHIP (Child Health Insurance bill) A pair of energy bills The Water Resources Development Act (that even Inhofe supports) The Farm bill The "Eavesdropping" Bill Funding for Amtrak Spending bills
I can go on, but there's cold beer calling my name just a few short blocks away.... You get the idea.
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
The final end of the Republican Party
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
9:58 AM
2008 will be a slaughter-fest for the Republican party. Unless they start changing their views and breaking away from Bush, they may very well be extinct. Then again, this may be a good thing for us....
GOP Voters Still Back Iraq Invasion CBS News Poll Shows Republican Voters Still Support Going To War, Even If They Think It's Going Poorly 
Most Americans think the Iraq war is going badly - two-thirds say so in the latest CBS News/New York Times Poll - and for most, the bad results they see now also mean the decision to go war was wrong in the first place.
That connection doesn't hold for Republicans, though: They tend to call the war the right thing no matter how they see it going. That's not just loyalty to President Bush - many in his party do in fact question how he is handling Iraq now - but it's also because of their views on how best to fight terrorism; their still-salient memories of Saddam Hussein; and their willingness to give the administration credit for going after perceived threats, past and present.
53% of Republicans think the war in Iraq is going well.
73% of Republicans support the war by calling it the right thing to have done.
21% of Independents who see things going badly call the decision the right thing to do.
15% of Democrats who think it's going badly (nearly all of them) say the same. There were hints of this Saddam-centered calculus even early in the war, too. In the summer of 2003, when Iraq's supposed cache of weapons of mass destruction had still failed to turn up, most Republicans said it didn't matter to them. They told us that the war would still have been worth it if there were no weapons - because, they volunteered when asked why, Saddam was out of power. (Most Democrats, by comparison, said it did matter.)
Dumbazz's
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
At least he showed up. But what are they hiding?
posted by
Wally
8:27 AM
Rove Ignores Subpoena, Blows Off Senate Judiciary Hearing. Jennings Shows, but refuses to answer questions
When I say "refuses to answer questions", I mean, he even refuses to explain his basic job duties. His answers pretty much included: "Senator, pursuant to the president's assertion of executive privilege over consideration, deliberations or communications related to the U.S. attorneys matter, I must respectfully decline to answer your question at this time," or "I don't recall." The top aide to White House political adviser Karl Rove refused to answer at least a dozen questions from a Senate committee Thursday about the firings of eight U.S. attorneys last year, asserting -- as expected -- a claim of executive privilege by President Bush.
Scott Jennings, who also is a special assistant to Bush, arrived at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing with his attorney, Mark Paoletta, to avoid a contempt citation.
The panel had subpoenaed both Jennings and Rove, but Rove refused to show up.
Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Illinois, asked Jennings, "Where is Karl Rove? Why is he hiding? Why does he throw a young staffer like you into the line of fire while he hides behind the White House curtains?" Maybe because Karl's a pussy? Maybe because he's guilty and he knows it? Maybe because he's busy with Jeff Gannon? Regardless of "why", the fact is that he blatantly ignored a subpeona - something that would land any of us in the pokey.
Can somebody explain to me why they continue to let these people get away with ignoring subpoenas? Why don't they just issue arrest warrants and have them hauled off to the Capital Jail? They've got to do something, because issuing strongly worded statements isn't doing the trick.
Arrest That Man
Here's what Olbermann had to say about it:
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
I wonder if he's going to bring his guitar?
posted by
Wally
7:58 AM
As if they didn't have enough traffic problems already...
...Bush is heading up to Minneapolis to visit the collapse site on Saturday.
What this means to all you lucky Minneapolitans is that you will be the recipients of all the benefits that come with a Bush Presidential visit. First, all flights in and out of the airport will be delayed while he arrives, and again while he leaves. Since he is afraid to be seen by the public, even while being driven in a bulletproof limo surrounded by secret service, every road within a mile of Bush's planned route will be completely closed while he drives through your city, leaving you to either wait until he's gone, or find alternate routes.
Then he'll spend a few minutes standing in a nice spot that's been carefully selected and manicured by his staff to make him look more "presidential-like" for the photo-op, with a view of the fallen bridge behind him. He'll say a few phrases and clauses (I'm not giving him the benefit of "sentences") about 9/11 and terrorists and 9/11, and the dangers of terrorists in a post 9/11 world. Then he'll takes some pictures with rescue and repair workers and leave, tying up traffic on the roads and airport again.

But wait, there's even more excitement for you lucky Viking fans! Bush is offering to help rebuild the bridge too!
President George W. Bush, who will travel to the scene of the disaster tomorrow, said the federal government would help rebuild the bridge in the city that will host next year's Republican National Convention.
"We in the federal government must respond, and respond robustly, to help the people there not only recover, but to make sure that lifeline of activity - that bridge - gets rebuilt as quickly as possible," Bush said. Translation: "lifeline of activity" means "I don't want any GOP conventioneers to be inconvenienced, so we'll get right on that and have it built in time for the convention". Fortunately he's just throwing money at it and not offering to personally get involved. After all, the White House has made it adequately clear that it's not their fault (did anyone say it was?).
Press secretary Tony Snow said while the inspection did not indicate the bridge was at risk of failing, "If an inspection report identifies deficiencies, the state is responsible for taking corrective actions." Not that I'm blaming Bush for the collapse. I'm just pointing out how fast this White House starts pointing fingers and deflecting blame. Guilty conscience perhaps?
At least he's not sending in FEMA.
In other news: Over 1,000 people were killed and millions displaced or marooned by flooding in India, Bangladesh and Nepal. At least 50 people were killed and 148 are missing after a boat capsized in Sierra Leone.
Permalink
::
5 comments
::
|
|
The "Compassionate Conservative"
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:55 AM
Bush is threatening to veto the Children's Health Insurance Program. Just like a republican, love the fetus; hate the child:
Expanded coverage faces White House veto
It is nothing short of shameful that 9 million American children are not covered by either public or private health insurance.
And now that the U.S. House of Representatives has approved legislation in a 225-204 vote largely along party lines that would expand coverage of the State Children's Health Insurance Program to insure an additional 5 million children, President Bush is threatening a veto.
Bush said in Cleveland Wednesday that he would oppose "Congress's attempt to federalize medicine."
Federalize medicine? What are the Medicare and Medicaid programs, if not federalized medicine? And where would we be without those?
Children Left Behind
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:28 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya "behind bars"

Permalink
::
6 comments
::
|
|
|
Thursday, August 2, 2007
|
Fuzzy Math - Bush Style
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
2:25 PM
As only he can do, Bush tried to slam the Democrats in reference to the budget. Luckily for the Dems, Dookie The Webmaster is here to send the b*tch slap:
THE PRESIDENT: The budget I've sent to Congress fully funds America's priorities. It increases discretionary spending by 6.9 percent. My Cabinet Secretaries assure me that this is adequate to meet the needs of our nation.
Unfortunately, Democratic leaders in Congress want to spend far more. Their budget calls for nearly $22 billion more in discretionary spending next year alone. These leaders have tried to downplay that figure. Yesterday one called this increase -- and I quote -- "a very small difference" from what I proposed. Only in Washington can $22 billion be called a very small difference. And that difference will keep getting bigger. Over the next five years it will total nearly $205 billion in additional discretionary spending. That $205 billion averages out to about $112 million per day, $4.7 million per hour, $78,000 per minute.
Put another way, that's about $1,300 in higher spending every second of every minute of every hour of every day of every year for the next five years. That's a lot of money -- even for career politicians in Washington. In fact, at that pace, Democrats in Congress would have spent an extra $300,000 since I began these remarks. Now I'm not the smartest person in the world but something tells me the war in Iraq is costing us a lot of money:
Iraq war priced at $4,700 a second
The war in Iraq is costing British and American taxpayers more than $US4000 ($4700) a second.
Washington's Congressional Budget Office estimated that as of June, up to $US500 billion ($580 billion) had been spent on combat operations in Iraq.
The tally is snowballing at the rate of $US10 billion a month, which translates to around $US4000 every second. Okay, so maybe I AM the smartest person in the world! Here's one more to back up my argument against the Chimperor-in-Chief:
Analysis says war could cost $1 trillion
The war in Iraq could ultimately cost well over a trillion dollars -- at least double what has already been spent -- including the long-term costs of replacing damaged equipment, caring for wounded troops, and aiding the Iraqi government, according to a new government analysis. So, as I understand it, it's okay to spend $4,700 per second in Iraq but not $1,300 per second on issues here at home? Why do you hate America, Bush? Why?

Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Forget Obama Girl!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
10:59 AM
Presenting.....Brownback Girl!
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
CNN's top search - Hannity Takes Anal
posted by
Wally
7:08 AM
Saw this on CNN. Click here, then on the right side select "top searches". Not sure how long he'll stay on top, but we caught the screen capture.
Here's the screen cap of the full page

And the zoom on the "most popular searches"

Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Specter: "We can do without an Attorney General for 6 months.""
posted by
Wally
6:33 AM
Even though Alberto Gonzales has now come out and written a letter admitting that he used confusing and misleading language during his testimony before the Senate Judicial Committee, Arlen Specter (R-PA) still is avoiding pressing perjury charges.Specter, too, said Gonzales misled the committee. But Specter said the attorney general's testimony did not amount to perjury; it was a crucial if reluctant vote of support.
"I don't think he did try to provide frank answers," Specter said. "It was more than confusion, it was misleading." So wait a minute Arlen. You're saying that the Attorney General intentionally misled you while testifying under oath. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't "intentionally misleading" the same thing as "lying"? If the top law enforcement agent in the nation can get away with "intentionally misleading" Congress while testifying under oath, then the law no longer exists in this country, and (as many of us have suspected for a long time) the hearings are a joke. Enough of the charade Arlen. Shut up, pack up your stuff, and go home. Your services are no longer needed.
While wimping out and not wanting to anger George or Dick or Karl with a perjury charge or call for Fredo's resignation, at least Senator Specter was able to bring himself to pay lip service to diminishing the Attorney General's powers.At one point, Specter said Gonzales should not have any say in the intelligence gathering at issue. "This is a temporary bill at most," the senator said. "I think we can do without an attorney general for six months, we've done without one for a long time." It seems that he's telling Gonzo "you can stay in your nice plush office with your high falluting title and bigass taxpayer funded paycheck, but don't do anything." Where do I sign up for that job?
Of course, it's just Arlen Specter mouthing off again. If his long history in the Senate is any indication, when it comes time to act on his words, he'll puss out again and do whatever Rove and Cheney tell him to do.
That being said, it's still fun to hear a high ranking Republican bitch-slapping Georgie's boy.
Misleading = Lying
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Wednesday, August 1, 2007
|
Happy Birthday Jerry!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
3:35 PM


GRATEFUL DEAD CHANNEL SNEAK PREVIEW
By now, you've heard that SIRIUS will be launching the Grateful Dead Channel later this summer. But from August 1 - 9, we'll be previewing the channel on Jam_ON Ch. 17.
You'll hear music spanning the band's career with unreleased concert recordings and commentary from band members Bob Weir, Mickey Hart, Phil Lesh and Bill Kreutzmann... and even rare archival interviews with Jerry Garcia!
Jam_ON will return to its regular programming on August 10.
Not yet a SIRIUS subscriber? Get a free online three-day trial to sample SIRIUS, including the Grateful Dead sneak preview on Jam_ON.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
It's not just the Iranians who are supplying weapons to the Iraqi resistance
posted by
Wally
3:03 PM
Your tax dollars at work... US cannot account for 190,000 guns in Iraq
The US government cannot account for 190,000 weapons issued to Iraqi security forces in 2004 and 2005, according to an investigation carried out by the Government Accountability Office.
According to the July 31 report, the military "cannot fully account for about 110,000 AK-47 assault rifles, 80,000 pistols, 135,000 items of body armour and 115,000 helmets reported as issued to Iraqi forces."
(snip)
US commanders often accuse foreign powers such as Iran of supplying arms to illegal militias fighting in Iraq, but the report shows they cannot fully account for the hundreds thousands of weapons they brought in themselves. That 10 Billion a month we're paying for the occupation in Iraq seems like much more of a bargain once you realize that it's supplying both sides of the fight.
Supplying the Enemy
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
If only we had such powers....
posted by
Wally
2:35 PM
Michael Weiner (thilly Thavage) claims that Justice Roberts' seizure was a Democratic plot
I can't wait to see what Olbermann, Stewart, and Colbert have to say about this. The right wing whackjobs are doing their best to make life easy for comedians lately. This time it was Michael Wiener's turn to play the retard (my apologies to retards for the comparison).On the July 30 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, Michael Savage reacted to news that Chief Justice John Roberts had suffered a seizure that day by raising the possibility that "his health was in some way tampered with by the Democrats." Savage said, "Something's wrong with this picture," after noting that Roberts' seizure occurred just three days after Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) said he would seek in general to reject any future Supreme Court nomination made by President Bush. Schumer told the American Constitution Society (ACS) in a July 27 speech: "I will recommend to my colleagues that we should not confirm any Bush nominee to the Supreme Court except in extraordinary circumstances." Schumer said that, since the confirmation of Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, the court had come to represent "what a diminishing clique of conservative ideologues wish for."
Savage asked, "Am I to believe there's no connection between Charles Schumer on Friday saying he would never appoint, or never, excuse me, approve another Bush appointment to the court, to any court? And then the chief justice suffers a so-called seizure two days later? You're telling me there's no possibility of a conspiracy by the Democrats to have caused this seizure in some manner?" He added: "Tell me it's not possible, and I'll tell you you're a liar." Hey Mike. Guess what. It's not possible, I'm not a liar, and you are both an idiot AND a liar. Media Matters has the full story.
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
If they only had a brain...
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:36 PM
Kansas Republicans will demand loyalty oath

Over the weekend, Kansas Republican leaders formed what they're calling a "loyalty committee," a move that's ticking off moderates and conservatives alike.
It is never a sign of strength when your group, country or otherwise starts imposing loyalty oaths, or so I told Kansas Republican Party Chairman Kris Kobach over the phone on Tuesday.
Yet, beginning next January, the state GOP will begin purging its leadership - all the way down to the precinct level - of any party official who actively supports non-Republicans for office.
.....
Among the loudest objections, Kobach said, was that from former Kansans for Life president Tim Golba.
Golba has proudly supported pro-life Democrats for office while continuing to vote on internal GOP matters, and he thinks he ought to be able to continue doing so.
"I helped lead tons of Bible-believing Christians into the Republican Party," Golba told me. "And what they're saying is they don't want us in the party anymore."
That's not at all what they're saying. But party loyalty comes first, Kobach said, adding, "I think it's a long time coming,' Kansans for Kris Kobach * I'm so glad I got to vote against this prick. He's a total Nazi. Just like the other repuke leaders in Johnson County, KS. With him and Phil Kline in JoCo, 2008 will be a landslide for the Dems.
Wiki: "He was heavily criticized for his work on behalf of the Federation for American Immigration Reform, Gun Owners of America, and for accepting donations from people associated with white supremacists and the founding of the militia movement."
"Kobach beat Taff and Lightner in the primary election, but later lost the election to Congressman Dennis Moore with a 55%-43% margin, Moore's largest victory to that date."
Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
More "executive privilege"
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
12:08 PM
Bush expected to claim executive privilege on Rove

President Bush is expected to claim executive privilege to prevent two more White House aides from testifying before Congress about the firings of federal prosecutors.
Thursday is the deadline for Karl Rove, Bush's top political adviser, to provide testimony and documents related to the firings, under a subpoena from the Senate Judiciary Committee. Also subpoenaed was White House political aide J. Scott Jennings. The Justice Department included both men on e-mails about the firings and the administration's response to the congressional investigation.
White House Counsel Fred Fielding has consistently said that top presidential aides- present and past - are immune from subpoenas and has declared the documents sought off-limits under executive privilege.
The House Judiciary Committee already has approved a contempt citation against two other Bush confidants, chief of staff Josh Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet Miers. The full House is expected to vote on the citation in the fall, but the Justice Department has said it won't prosecute the two.
F*cker
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
The Royals to win World Series!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:35 AM
Because it's a cold day in hell when you hear this:
Cheney admits was wrong about "last throes" in Iraq

U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney acknowledged on Tuesday he was wrong in 2005 when he insisted the insurgency in Iraq was in its "last throes."
It was Cheney's most direct public admission of how badly the administration had underestimated the strength of America's enemies in the increasingly unpopular war in Iraq.
But Cheney, an architect of the 2003 U.S.-led invasion, otherwise gave no ground in an interview on CNN's "Larry King Live" as he defended President George W. Bush's Iraq policy.
He said the Bush administration would still send troops into Iraq if it could do it all over again, even knowing what it knows now, including that more than 3,000 U.S. military personnel would be killed.
"I firmly believe," Cheney said, "that the decisions we've made with respect to Iraq and Afghanistan have been absolutely the sound ones in terms of the overall strategy."
Burrrrrr
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:32 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya going for a walk with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown

Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headlines
& Comments |
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Store |
 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Amazon.com |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|