|
Air
America Radio |
 |
|
|
|
|
Head-On
Radio Network |
 |
|
|
|
|
Search
dubyaD40.com |
 |
|
|
|
|
Ads by
The Google |
 |
|
|
|
Take
Action |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recent
Posts |
 |
|
|
|
|
Archives |
 |
|
|
|
|
Today's
Reason To Drink |
 |
|
|
|
|
Want to
link to us? |
 |
It's easy to do. Right click on the image
below and choose "Copy." Then paste it on
your site.

|
|
| |
|
Blogroll |
 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Today's
Topics |
 |
| |
|
Tuesday, July 31, 2007
|
Run for the border
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:15 PM
Rep. Jay Inslee introduces Gonzales impeachment resolution! Inslee confirms 15 co-sponsors.

More info coming soon!
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Sean Hannity's "Freedom Concert" a bust
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
9:14 AM
Hannity's Freedom Concert... Freer Than Expected?
We had a News Hounds blogger at Thursday night's Freedom Concert. He/she reported back to us that the concert was not sold out, that KFMB AM was giving out free tickets (4 packs) to listeners who called in, and that Oliver North's Freedom Alliance, the beneficiary of this supposedly charitable event, was also giving away tickets. While Hannity bragged on Hannity & Colmes that it was a benefit for Freedom Alliance's Scholarship Fund, only $4 of every ticket purchased (prices ranged from $38-78) went to the Fund. According to KFMB's news report, only hundreds attended. Our Hound got a photo of Hannity's vanity boot.

Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
No wonder Bush likes him - Chief Justice Roberts has seizure and takes a dive
posted by
Wally
7:07 AM
Chief justice "fully recovered" but hospitalized after seizure, fall
Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. was rushed to a hospital Monday afternoon after suffering a seizure at his summer island home, a Supreme Court spokeswoman said.
Roberts, 52, fell on a dock after having a "benign idiopathic seizure," said Kathleen Landin Arberg, the court's public information officer. She said that Roberts has "fully recovered from the incident" but that he would remain at Penobscot Bay Medical Center here overnight for observation.
Arberg said the chief justice, who has presided over the court for two terms, suffered minor scrapes in the fall but that a "thorough neurological evaluation ... revealed no cause for concern." Seattle Times No cause for concern? The top judge in the nation, making decisions that will affect every American for generations has a seizure and smacks his head and there's no cause for concern?Roberts fell five to 10 feet and landed on the dock of his summer home, hitting the back of his head, according to the Courier Gazette of Rockland, Maine.
He appeared ashen and was foaming at the mouth, according to the paper. Foaming at the mouth? That can't be a good thing. Could it be the stress of being Chief Justice, trying to fill William Rehnquist's shoes is getting to him? Is he trying too hard to emulate his predecessor? Did he lean too far right and fall over, or is it something more troubling?Rehnquist also dealt with a bizarre health issue during his years on the court.
While serving as an associate justice in 1981, he checked into a hospital to kick an addiction to painkillers.
FBI reports released after his death show Rehnquist was plagued by hallucinations and imagined a CIA plot against him. NY Post Great, Bush replaced a psychotic paranoid junkie as a Chief Justice with one who is "rabid". Fitting of the administration, actually.
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
FBI and IRS Search Home of Sen. Ted "Bridge to Nowhere" Stevens (R-AK)
posted by
Wally
6:17 AM
Another day, another high ranking Republican senator being investigated for corruption. But when the FBI and the IRS are both raiding your house, they're serious about the investigation. This isn't a political partisan hackjob, if even Gonzo couldn't get the DOJ to put the lid on it. Federal agents searched the home of U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens on Monday, focusing on records related to his relationship with an oil field services contractor jailed in a public corruption investigation, a law enforcement official said.
"A series of tubes..."
Stevens, 83, has been under a federal investigation for a 2000 renovation project more than doubling the size of his home in Girdwood that was overseen by Bill Allen, a contractor who has pleaded guilty to bribing Alaska state legislators.
An e-mail statement issued by Stevens through his Washington, D.C., spokesman said federal agents had alerted his attorneys that they wanted to search his home. Email? There goes Senator Stevens clogging up the internet "tubes" with emails again. Stevens, who is the longest-serving Republican in Senate history, said the interests of justice would be best served if he commented after the investigation. "I continue to believe this investigation should proceed to its conclusion without any appearance that I have attempted to influence its outcome," Stevens said. "The legal process should be allowed to proceed so that all the facts can be established and the truth determined." Translation: "I can't comment on an 'ongoing investigation'. Besides, I'll be dead by the time anything comes of this, so who cares". It's lucky that this crazy mean old codger is from Alaska, the only state big enough to fit his ego. He's managed to stay in power so long he thinks he's untouchable. For instance, he talked the state of Alaska into naming things like airports and buildings and highways after him. Normally you have to die before they start to name things after you.
I wonder if they're going to rename them when "Uncle Ted" is in the pokey with the likes of Duke Cunningham and Tom Delay, learning exactly what "a series of tubes" really means?
Couldn't happen to a nicer guy
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Monday, July 30, 2007
|
Gonzo to be impeached tomorrow?
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
3:45 PM

MSNBC just reported on-air that Rep. Jay Inslee, D-WA-01, will sponsor a resolution favoring the impeachment of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Still developing, but an interesting prospect indeed.
UPDATE: The outstanding team at ThinkProgress caught the report too:
Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA) is introducing legislation that would require the House Judiciary Committee and the House of Representatives to begin an impeachment investigation into Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, in the wake of his damaging testimony last week. The legislation reads:
Resolved: That the Committee on the Judiciary shall investigate fully whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to impeach Alberto Gonzales for high crimes and misdemeanors. We strongly applaud Inslee's action and thank him for his courageous leadership. Northwest Progressive Blog
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
PNAC is alive and well
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:29 PM
Analysis: Cheney favors attack on Iran
Diplomatic arm-wrestling between Iran and the West over the future of the Islamic republic's nuclear program has not prevented talk of the military option as a solution to the crisis, despite the tsunami-like reaction such a military adventure would generate in the Arab and Islamic world.
.....
In fact, President George W. Bush has reiterated on numerous occasions that "everything is still on the table" when it comes to discussing Iran's nuclear development and how to sanction Iran over its continuing refusal to abide by directives from the international community.
But a well-informed source tells United Press International that according to senior U.S. intelligence officials, President Bush has definitely decided not to strike any of Iran's alleged nuclear weapons production facilities this year.
The sources say the officials stressed the words "this year," meaning in 2007. That, however, does not rule out the possibility of military intervention in 2008, right until January 2009, when Bush's term in the White House comes to an end.
This information seems to back up a report published in the July 16 issue of the London Guardian that claims President Bush gave in to Vice President Dick Cheney, accepting to carry out military action against Iran before he leaves office.
Exit Strategy 
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
"Startling Progress", "Hearts and Minds" and all that crap...
posted by
Wally
12:30 PM
Nearly a third of the population of Iraq is in need of immediate emergency aid according to a new report from Oxfam and a coalition of Iraqi NGOs.
Let me repeat that, a third of the country in need of immediate emergency aid.The report said the government was failing to provide basics such as food and shelter for eight million people.
It warned of a humanitarian crisis that had escalated since the 2003 invasion.
It suggests that 70% of Iraq's 26.5m population are without adequate water supplies, compared to 50% prior to the invasion. Only 20% have access to effective sanitation.
Nearly 30% of children are malnourished, a sharp increase on the situation four years ago. Some 15% of Iraqis regularly cannot afford to eat. Meanwhile, as George and the Iraqi government look forward to their month long Summer vacations, Dubya and his pals stand up in front of the cameras and microphones and tell us how "swimmingly" things are going over there, about all the "startling progress" in Iraq.
No wonder they have no problem defending Fredo and his pathological lying under oath. They've become so accustomed to lying that they don't even recognize it or know they're doing it anymore.
Doing a heck of a job Georgie
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Mr. Lubner wusses out again
posted by
Clyde
10:20 AM
Senior GOP Senator Says Gonzales Probe Can Wait
The leading Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee has advised a wait-and-see approach to a perjury investigation of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, saying more time is needed to determine if the embattled Cabinet official lied to Congress.
Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, said he wanted to wait at least until a briefing Monday by the Bush administration on classified spy programs.
"Let's give him a chance," Specter said Sunday. "What we want to do is find out what the facts are."
Last week, four Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee asked Solicitor General Paul Clement for a special prosecutor to probe Gonzales, who they say may have perjured himself during testimony regarding a domestic spying program. The request came after FBI Director Robert S. Mueller appeared to contradict Gonzales' statements.
(born without a spine)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
The Future Looks Bright - Republican Collapse Among Young Americans
posted by
Wally
8:26 AM
A major, multi-mode survey of America's young people recently conducted by Democracy Corps (PDF format) shows young people profoundly alienated from the Republican Party and poised to deliver a significant majority to the Democratic nominee for President in 2008.
The looming disaster Republicans face among younger voters represents a setback that could haunt them for many generations to come. Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama lead Rudy Giuliani-the most acceptable of the Republican offerings among youth-by significant margins, assembling a diverse coalition of support and leading the vote among independents. Exploring attitudes toward the parties themselves, young voters' reaction to fundamental issues and their perceptions of the GOP suggest a fundamental alienation from the Republican Party, a crisis that will not leave with the Bush administration.
Young people adopt views diametrically opposed from the Republican Party on issues as diverse as the war, global warming, gay marriage and, to some extent, illegal immigration as well. In fact, there is not a single issue in this survey where younger voters line up with the Republican Party.
Partisanship and political participation are both habit-forming and this population has the numeric strength to change American politics for the next 20 to 30 years once fully engaged. Given the Republican brand crisis among younger voters, progressives are very close to locking down this vote. While Democrats will win the youth vote in 2008, this cohort needs continued outreach to increase turnout and engagement. The scale of the Democratic margin and the degree to which progressives can energize young people remain in doubt. Young voters are alienated by Republicans but waiting to see if anyone delivers on the issue that concerns them most. I hope Pelosi, Reid, Dean, and the other Democrat party leaders are are paying attention. If they follow through and deliver on their promises and potential, they can lock in power for a generation or more. If they don't deliver, and instead stick with the status quo, keep caving in to Bush and the Republicans, and fail to make the bold moves necessary to ensure the security of all Americans (financial security, medical security, etc), then both the Republican and Democratic parties can and should wither and die while someone else steps up to make the changes necessary to revitalize this country and make it great again. Call and/or write your Congresscritters (you can find a link on the left side of this web page). Make sure that they get this message. Let's give the next generation something to thank us for.
Kids These Days
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:34 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya driving Britain's Prime Minister Gordon Brown around in a golf cart

Permalink
::
6 comments
::
|
|
|
Sunday, July 29, 2007
|
At least some in the DOJ care
posted by
Clyde
7:39 AM
Mining of Data Prompted Fight Over Spying
A 2004 dispute over the National Security Agency's secret surveillance program that led top Justice Department officials to threaten resignation involved computer searches through massive electronic databases, according to current and former officials briefed on the program.
It is not known precisely why searching the databases, or data mining, raised such a furious legal debate. But such databases contain records of the phone calls and e-mail messages of millions of Americans, and their examination by the government would raise privacy issues.
The N.S.A.'s data mining has previously been reported. But the disclosure that concerns about it figured in the March 2004 debate helps to clarify the clash this week between Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales and senators who accused him of misleading Congress and called for a perjury investigation.
The confrontation in 2004 led to a showdown in the hospital room of then Attorney General John Ashcroft, where Mr. Gonzales, the White House counsel at the time, and Andrew H. Card Jr., then the White House chief of staff, tried to get the ailing Mr. Ashcroft to reauthorize the N.S.A. program.
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Typical
posted by
Clyde
7:30 AM
Bush Aide Blocked Report Global Health Draft In 2006 Rejected for Not Being Political
A surgeon general's report in 2006 that called on Americans to help tackle global health problems has been kept from the public by a Bush political appointee without any background or expertise in medicine or public health, chiefly because the report did not promote the administration's policy accomplishments, according to current and former public health officials.
The report described the link between poverty and poor health, urged the U.S. government to help combat widespread diseases as a key aim of its foreign policy, and called on corporations to help improve health conditions in the countries where they operate. A copy of the report was obtained by The Washington Post.
Three people directly involved in its preparation said its publication was blocked by William R. Steiger, a specialist in education and a scholar of Latin American history whose family has long ties to President Bush and Vice President Cheney. Since 2001, Steiger has run the Office of Global Health Affairs in the Department of Health and Human Services.
Richard H. Carmona, who commissioned the "Call to Action on Global Health" while serving as surgeon general from 2002 to 2006, recently cited its suppression as an example of the Bush administration's frequent efforts during his tenure to give scientific documents a political twist. At a July 10 House committee hearing, Carmona did not cite Steiger by name or detail the report's contents and its implications for American public health.
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Saturday, July 28, 2007
|
My version of the story
posted by
Clyde
6:04 AM
Cheney's ticker battery to be replaced
Dark Lord Darth Cheney will undergo routine cyborg maintenance and a minor surgical procedure Saturday to replace the battery in the special pacemaker he has in his chest, a spokeswoman said. Meanwhile, White House Press Secretary Tony Snow told reporters that PresiDunce Bush is looking forward to being in charge for a change.
"During the vice president's annual physical examination and oil change in June, testing of his implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with mutating capacity indicated that the device's outdated atomic battery has reached the level of critical mass where elective replacement of the device is recommended, because failure of the device could come in the form of a mushroom cloud" Megan McGinn, deputy press secretary for Cheney, said Friday.
She has said doctors and mechanics must replace the entire device to replace the battery, and that the surgery will be performed at George Washington University Hospital, while Hal E. Burton's Tire and Lube will be responsible for belt replacement and tire rotation.
During his routine checkup and dyno testing last month, Cheney underwent a stress and road course test, and doctors also checked out the defibrillator, which was implanted in June 2001 to shock his heart if he experiences an irregular heartbeat or carburetor failure. As suspected, the stress test showed no blockages in his heart as it IS an empty vessel anyhow. Doctors also said then that his defibrillator was functioning properly and that they had not had to treat any irregular beating of the vice president's heart.
(Link to the unedited for comedic effect version)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Trouble in paradise
posted by
Clyde
5:11 AM
Heated exchanges mark consultations among Iraq's PM, U.S. officials
A key aide says Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's relations with U.S. commander Gen. David Petraeus are so poor that the Iraqi leader may ask Washington to withdraw the well-regarded U.S. military leader from duty in Iraq.
The Iraqi foreign minister calls the relationship difficult.
Petraeus says his ties with al-Maliki are "very good" but acknowledges expressing "the full range of emotions" on "a couple of occasions."
U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker, who meets together with al-Maliki and Petraeus at least weekly, concedes "sometimes there are sporty exchanges."
(Rut Roh)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
UNBELIEVABLE
posted by
Clyde
5:00 AM
Army's 'Debt Of Service' Leaves Vets Perplexed
Servicemen and women who made huge sacrifices fighting in the war and now paying yet another price, even after coming home.
One soldier in particular is currently battling against a new "debt of service."
(snip)
Former Army Specialist Rodriguez started getting bills for $700 for lost or damaged government property this summer. Although he was discharged some four years ago, bills recently arrived demanding payment, but giving no details on what or why -- nor do they offer a way to dispute the charges.
"For doing my job you're going to bill me?" Rodriguez said.
(Lovin the troops)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Friday, July 27, 2007
|
Rove explains why GOP lost Congress in '06. Hint: Bush's War had nothing to do with it.
posted by
Wally
2:44 PM
I sometimes wish I was a funny enough guy to make this stuff up. Spinning like a F5 tornado, Rove denied any responsibility for the GOP losses in the 2006 election. With he and Bush physically and psychologically incapable of ever admitting error or fault, Rove gave a careful analysis of the situation, and pointed blame directly at.... Congress.Karl Rove, President Bush's political lieutenant, told a closed-door meeting of 2008 Republican House candidates and their aides Tuesday that it was less the war in Iraq than corruption in Congress that caused their party's defeat in the 2006 elections.
Rove's clear advice to the candidates is to distance themselves from the culture of Washington. Specifically, Republican candidates are urged to make clear they have no connection with disgraced congressmen such as Duke Cunningham and Mark Foley. In effect, Rove was rebutting the complaint inside the party that George W. Bush is responsible for Republican miseries by invading Iraq. Nope, it had nothing at all to do with Bush's misadventure in Iraq. In spite of myriad polls saying that the Iraq war was, if not the number one priority, one of the top priorities of American voters, Rove scurried back into his secure location, shielded from the hazards of reality and facts.
Every time I think these guys can't possibly do anything that would surprise me - that I've seen everything I could see, they manage to do it again. Amazing in their audacity.
Traitor
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
He keeps going and going and going...
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
2:41 PM
Darth Cheney's ticker battery to be replaced 
Vice President Dick Cheney will undergo a minor surgical procedure Saturday to replace the battery in the special pacemaker he has in his chest, a spokeswoman said.
"During the vice president's annual physical examination in June, testing of his implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indicated that the device's battery has reached the level where elective replacement of the device is recommended," Megan McGinn, deputy press secretary for Cheney, said Friday.
She has said doctors must replace the entire device to replace the battery, and that the surgery will be performed at George Washington University Hospital.
During his routine checkup last month, Cheney underwent a stress test, and doctors also checked out the defibrillator, which was implanted in June 2001 to shock his heart if he experiences an irregular heartbeat. The stress test showed no blockages in his heart. Doctors also said then that his defibrillator was functioning properly and that they had not had to treat any irregular beating of the vice president's heart.
Send bacon!
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
Captain F*cking Obvious!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:14 PM
I know, I know, another Mitt post. But this is getting too easy...
Romney: Americans angry with Iraq war
Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney said Friday that the country is angry over the lack of progress in the Iraq war, a stinging assessment of the Bush administration's handling of the conflict from a Republican candidate.
Campaigning in Iowa, the former Massachusetts governor also argued that despite the nation's frustration over the war, voters aren't ready to replace President Bush with a Democrat.
"I know the Democrats are getting all ready, they are measuring the drapes and getting the carpet all ready for how they are going to take over the White House, and I think they are going to get a big surprise," Romney told a crowd gathered at a golf course. "America is not happy with how the war in Iraq is going, and is angry. But America is not about to take a sharp left turn and put somebody in the White House who would turn America into a European-type state."
While Romney supported the March 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq and backs Bush's current troop increase, he has repeatedly said the post-invasion period was "mismanaged" with a lack of preparation for the insurgency and adequate planning for a government handover.
No Shit Sherlock 
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Americans now trust Democrats more than Republicans on every single issue, including national security and taxes
posted by
Wally
10:34 AM
When it comes to National Security, Democrats are now trusted more by 42% of likely voters, Republicans by 40%. This means that Democrats now enjoy at least a nominal edge on all ten issues regularly tracked by Rasmussen Reports to gauge voters' trust of the two major parties.
In late June Democrats had the edge on nine of ten issues. At that time, the GOP had a single point advantage of the National Security issue.

The GOP also lost ground on the Economy this month with Democrats now trusted more 47% to 38%. In June,the Democrats' advantage was 47% to 40%.
Forty-three percent (43%) now trust Democrats more on Taxes, 41% trust Republicans more. GOP=Losers
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
Republican to skip YouTube debate?
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
10:13 AM
What are they afraid of? Scaredy cats...
GOP Candidates Invited To Attend YouTube Debate
The Republicans take their turn answering unpredictable YouTube questions on September 17 in St. Petersburg, FL. When the the debate was announced by the state party, CNN and YouTube last Friday, Sen. John McCain immediately RSVP'd. Since then, silence from the other campaigns.
Mitt:
Republican Mitt Romney isn't sure yet whether he'll participate in the CNN/YouTube.com Republican debate in September, but he's no fan of the format.
"I think the presidency ought to be held at a higher level than having to answer questions from a snowman," he said in an interview yesterday. Rudy:
A Giuliani campaign source says that the ex-NYC mayor will most likely opt out of the 9/17 CNN/YouTube Debate in Florida. The reason: unspecified scheduling conflicts. More from TPM:
You realize why Rudy doesn't like the YouTube debate format, right? He doesn't want the NY fire fighter's to get a clean shot at him on national TV. Maybe Newt was right. Maybe pygmies is the perfect word...
One of the thoughts that occurred to me with regards to the Democratic Youtube debate was how weird the questions for the GOP candidates could potentially be. For the Democratic debates, most of the issues that are on the table are pretty mainstream, like healthcare and Iraq and poverty and global warming, and thus its pretty difficult for the standard rank-and-file member of the democratic base to ask them in an amusing viral format like Youtube and still come out as looking too bizarre (unless they happen to be a talking snowman). As far as issues like illegal immigration and "coercive interrogation techniques" go, how does one ask questions like this in a Youtube format in an amusing way? The differences between the GOP base and the political mainstream can seem less extreme when asked by someone like Wolf Blitzer, but if presented from the standard GOP rank-and-file member of the base, it seemed like a great way to show how unhinged the GOP has become on some of these issues. Personally, I'm surprised the GOP ever got close to agreeing to this format, and once the Democratic debate happened and showed the format in action, I didn't see how it could have been pulled off by the GOP.

Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Mitt won't embarrass us!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:03 AM
Like Clinton "supposedly" did:
Excerpt:
If elected, Romney vowed he would not embarrass the country as former President Bill Clinton did by having an affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.
"I will not embarrass the people of this nation by doing anything in the White House that will in any way demean the institution of marriage," Romney said. Uhhhh....Mitt:
In the wake of the House of Representatives' approval of two articles of impeachment, Bill Clinton's approval rating has jumped 10 points to 73 percent, the latest CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll shows.
That's not only an all-time high for Clinton, it also beats the highest approval rating President Ronald Reagan ever had. Mitt, your current president is an embarrassment. EVERYWHERE he goes, it's the same thing. Even in the U.S.A.
 Clinton in another country:
 Clinton here at home:
 Yup, that's an embarrassment Mitt. You stupid bitch.
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
FBI Chief's Testimony Fans the Flames On Gonzo's Pants
posted by
Wally
7:54 AM
The director of the FBI offered testimony Thursday that sharply conflicted with Attorney General Alberto Gonzales's sworn statements about a 2004 confrontation in which top Justice Department officials threatened to resign over a secret intelligence operation.
The director, Robert Mueller III, told the House Judiciary Committee that the confrontation was about the National Security Agency's counterterrorist eavesdropping program, describing it as "an NSA program that has been much discussed." His testimony was a serious blow to Gonzales, who insisted at a Senate hearing on Tuesday that there were no disagreements inside the Bush administration about the program at the time of those discussions or at any other time.
The director's remarks were especially significant because Mueller is the Justice Department's chief law enforcement official. He also played a crucial role in the 2004 dispute over the program, intervening with President George W. Bush to help deal with the threat of mass resignations that grew out of a day of emergency meetings at the White House and at the hospital bedside of John Ashcroft, who was then attorney general. Of course the Republicans - having spent 6 years and 70 million dollars investigating President Clinton's penis and Hillary's underwear drawer, and then another 6 years looking the other way while the Bush administration lied us into wars, looted the treasury, and dismantled our basic civil rights - cried foul, saying those wild-eyed vengeful crazy liberal Democrats (like Arlen Specter, for example) are on a witch hunt over nothing. It seems to me that the Republicans think more highly of Clinton's sperm than of American soldiers, since they were decidedly more upset by the spilling of that on a blue dress than by the spilling of blood on Iraqi soil. But I digress. "What we are witnessing is an out-of-control Congress which spends time calling for special prosecutors, starting investigations, issuing subpoenas and generally just trying to settle scores," said Scott Stanzel, a White House spokesman. "All the while they fail to pass appropriations bills and important issues like immigration reform, energy and other problems go unanswered." Hey Scott, that immigration reform bill to which you refer - remind me again who blocked that one. Why was it that the immigration reform bill didn't pass? Oh yeah, I remember. The Republicans blocked it. Go whine at them, not us.
As for the subpoenas and investigations, maybe if the Republicans in Congress had been doing their job for the past 6 years instead of letting the Bush administration run roughshod over the Constitution, the Democrats wouldn't be so busy trying to clean up your mess. The GOP is supposed to be the "tough on crime" party. Unless, of course, they are the ones guilty of committing the crime.
GOP = Good Old-fashioned Perjury
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:24 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya with these "Special Olympians"

Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
|
Thursday, July 26, 2007
|
The Dow takes a dump
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
3:09 PM
Stocks throttled by credit, housing fears Dow recovers around 100 points; still suffers 2nd-worst day of 2007
Stocks ended sharply lower Thursday as anxiety about shaky credit markets and the troubled housing sector swept Wall Street, pushing the Dow Jones Industrial Average down more than 400 points, its largest single-day drop this year, before recouping a chunk of its losses.
"We're seeing panic in the market today - you can almost cut the level of fear with a knife," said Al Goldman, chief market strategist at AG Edwards.
At the unofficial 4 p.m. close, the Dow Jones industrials was off 310 points to 13,474.9, with all but one of its 30 stocks in the red. The Dow earlier fell to a low of 13,335.
Flush 
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Next time a "bushie" tells you that Congress has no right to "micromanage" the war...
posted by
Wally
1:43 PM
Tell them to go back and read the frikking Constitution before they go on shooting their mouth off and sounding like a damn fool.
But don't listen to me. Listen to people who do this for a living, Law Professors and Constitutional Scholars. In a open letter to Congressional leaders (posted on the Harvard Law and Policy Review Online), "law professors from across the country argue that the Constitution's structure contemplates a robust role for Congress in funding the military, initiating war, and defining the parameters of military operations." Here are a few items of interest from that letter:
The Constitution's text is quite plain with respect to one mechanism by which Congress might give legal effect to whatever judgement it makes: Congress's spending powers. Congress clearly may cut off funds entirely and bring an armed conflict to an end. It may also take the intermediate step of providing that the President may not use military appropriations to alter the scope of nature of the conflict that Congress has authorized and funded, such as by prohibiting the President from using appropriated funds to increase troop levels or broaden a conflict into additional nations or territories.
The Constitution expressly grants Congress extensive powers relating to war, beyond the well-known appropriations power and the power to declare war. Specifically, the Constitution authorizes Congress to: - Lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States
- Define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas and offenses against the law of nations
- Declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water
- Raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years
- Provide and maintain a navy
- Make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces
- Provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions
- Provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress
- Make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States or in any department of officer thereof.
These provisions plainly set forth an extensive role for Congress that goes far beyond the initial decision to declare war and subsequent decisions regarding its funding. This mass of war powers confers on Congress an ongoing regulatory authority with respect to the war. Indeed, these powers are so extensive that Chief Justice John Marshall opined... that "The whole powers of war (are), by the Constitution of the United States, vested in Congress...." As Commander in Chief, the President's role is to prosecute the war that Congress has authorized within the legitimate parameters Congress sets forth. Congress has exercised precisely this power to define the parameters of armed conflict or war on a number of occasions, some of which concern recent military engagements. Thus, Congress may limit the scope of the present Iraq War by either of two mechanisms. First, it may directly define limits on the scope of that war, such as by imposing geographic restrictions or a ceiling on the number of troops assigned to that conflict. Second, it may achieve the same objective by enacting appropriations restrictions that limit the use of appropriated funds. Indeed, the reason that the Constitution explicitly limits appropriations for the Army to two years is in order to ensure that Congress oversees ongoing military engagements. Read the entire letter, including extensive footnotes (in pdf format) HERE. So, next time somebody says Congress has no right to "micromanage" the war, direct them to the Constitution - I'm sure they may have heard of it from time to time - and then use your First Amendment right guaranteed by that god-damned piece of paper, and tell them to blow it out their ass until they learn what the hell they're talking about.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Even Redstate.com says "It's Time To Take Fredo Out Fishing"
posted by
Wally
12:04 PM
When the extreme right wing "bushie" apologists - the ones who will defend Bush and Cheney even if they were to eat live kittens in the Rose Garden on live TV - start criticizing the "can do no wrong no matter what" administration, you know Bush is in trouble. Redstate.com, as far as I know, has never before admonished Bush or his administration or the Republicans for anything, ever. Until now....the man President Bush calls "Fredo"--was a Presidential nickname ever more apt?--should at long last be invited to spend more time with his family. Much more time. He should be a Soccer Dad, a Harry Potter Dad, a Couch Potato, Sleeping Late In The Morning The Better To Avoid Any Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings He Might Accidentally Stumble Into Dad, a Dad who doesn't leave the Gonzales family compound for any reason whatsoever without legions upon legions of intelligent adults accompanying him in a supervisory capacity.
Especially if he suddenly gets a hankering to serve his country once again. In which case, the legions upon legions of intelligent adults accompanying him in a supervisory capacity should move Heaven and Earth to convince Alberto Gonzales that "his country" is Kazakhstan. Or Portugal. Or Libya. Or Greece. Or [INSERT NAME OF ANY COUNTRY BUT THAT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Now, whatever your view concerning just how scandalous this scandal is and no matter what your opinion may be on the proposition that the U.S. Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President (and I think there is something to be said for the correctness of that proposition), it is near indisputable that Alberto Gonzales has created an Everest of a political problem for the Bush Administration with his "handling" of this issue. With the die-hard Bushies - the 25%ers who still think he's doing a heck of a job talking like this, I wonder how Cheney's heart is doing? How long until we read about Karl being caught putting in orders in the Denny's parking lot with his old pal Rush.
Hey Fredo, the fish are biting
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
The Dems are on fire today!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
11:17 AM
Let's start with John Conyers:
Conyers Outfoxes Bushie in Contempt Showdown by Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse Wed Jul 25, 2007
Rep. John Conyers is methodically setting up the legal elements for Congress to pursue statutory and/or inherent contempt proceedings against executive branch officials in a manner that essentially wipes out any claim to executive privilege to shield the truth. A few weeks ago, I wrote a diary (here) on Impeachment by Frog-Marching Congressional Oversight, which suggested that Congress had a better chance -- according to US Supreme Court precedent -- to obtain evidence and testimony from the Bush gang if it conducted a "criminal proceeding" to investigate potential criminal or unlawful conduct by executive branch officials. The beauty of the "criminal proceeding" is that Bush is not likely to prevail on executive privilege claims. Well, it looks like the US Attorney probe has now been officially transformed into a "criminal proceeding" to determine whether Bush officials have violated specific laws. Next up, Sen. Dems Call for Spec Prosecutor to Investigate Gonzales Perjury:
Dems call for probe of Gonzales' statements
A group of Senate Democrats called Wednesday for a special counsel to investigate whether Attorney General Alberto Gonzales perjured himself regarding the firings of U.S. attorneys and administration dissent over President Bush's domestic surveillance program.
"We ask that you immediately appoint an independent special counsel from outside the Department of Justice to determine whether Attorney General Gonzales may have misled Congress or perjured himself in testimony before Congress," four Democratic senators wrote in a letter Wednesday, according to a draft obtained by The Associated Press.
"It has become apparent that the Attorney General has provided at a minimum half-truths and misleading statements" to the Judiciary Committee, they added. And finally, Leahy to subpeona ROVE:
Turd Blossom to be subpoenaed
Senate Democrats called for a special counsel to investigate whether Attorney General Alberto Gonzales lied under oath and subpoenaed top presidential aide Karl Rove Thursday in a widening probe into the dismissal of federal prosecutors.
"It has become apparent that the attorney general has provided at a minimum half-truths and misleading statements," four members of the Senate Judiciary Committee wrote in a letter to Solicitor General Paul Clement.
They dispatched the letter shortly before Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., announced the subpoena of Rove, the president's top political strategist.
"We have now reached a point where the accumulated evidence shows that political considerations factored into the unprecedented firing of at least nine United States Attorneys last year," said Leahy, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
DOJ: We won't enforce a contempt citation
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
9:25 AM
DoJ Makes It Official: Contempt Stops in Congress
The Justice Department sent a letter yesterday to the House Judiciary Committee that made the administration's position official: a U.S. attorney will not enforce a citation of contempt, should it pass the House.
Or as the letter (you can read it here), sent to the committee yesterday by Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski, put it:
"As it considers the contempt resolutions, we think it is important that the Committee appreciate fully the longstanding Department of Justice position, articulated during Administrations of both parties, that "the criminal contempt of Congress statute does not apply to the President or presidential subordinates who assert executive privilege." That last quote is indeed from a 1995 opinion from Clinton's Justice Department, which The Washington Post reported on this weekend. As the Clinton-era DoJ officials behind that memo told the Post, they didn't think that Congress could force the U.S. attorney to prosecute, but did think that the president's assertion of executive privilege should be heard in court.
TPM
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
More "startling progress" on meeting those benchmarks - Iraq's largest Sunni bloc bails out of Cabinet
posted by
Wally
8:01 AM
I wonder where this fits into Georges 8 benchmarks that have to be met by September in Iraq? I can't wait to see how Tony Snow spins this to make it look like the "surge" is working. Iraq's largest bloc of Sunni politicians suspended membership in the government Wednesday, a bid that appeared timed to deepen disenchantment in Washington with the Shiite prime minister's faltering leadership.
The dramatic political development came as two suicide car bombers killed at least 50 soccer fans celebrating Iraq's ascension to the finals of a prestigious tournament. A total of 88 people were killed or found dead nationwide, according to police, morgue and hospital officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not allowed to release information.
The Iraqi Accordance Front, which has six Cabinet seats and 44 of 275 in parliament, gave Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki a week to meet its demands or see ministers quit the 14-month-old government.
In April, five ministers loyal to radical Shiite cleric cquit the government over al-Maliki's refusal to set a timeline for American forces to leave Iraq. Should the Accordance Front ministers quit, al-Maliki's so-called national unity government would be limping along with more than a fourth of the 38 Cabinet posts vacated by protest resignations. That's startling progress alright. Hey George, you're doing a heck of a job spreading democracy - both in Iraq and at home.
Benchmarks
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Wednesday, July 25, 2007
|
More Republican Corruption
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
3:07 PM
The "Culture of Corruption" continues...
Alaska's Young, Stevens Face Inquiry
WASHINGTON -- A senior House Republican has come under criminal investigation in the Justice Department's widening inquiry into alleged influence-peddling and self-dealing in Congress.
Rep. Don Young of Alaska, the former chairman of the House Transportation Committee, now is the subject of a continuing criminal inquiry involving possible political favors for a company in Alaska, people close to the case said. Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska, the powerful former chairman of the Appropriations Committee and the longest-serving Senate Republican, is also now under criminal investigation, these people said.
Federal investigators are examining whether Rep. Young or Sen. Stevens accepted bribes, illegal gratuities or unreported gifts from VECO Corp., Alaska's largest oil-field engineering firm, people close to the case said.
It isn't known what VECO allegedly may have received in return. The company has been awarded a series of federal contracts since 2000, including contracts to provide logistics support for arctic research, among other projects.
HaHa!
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
House Judiciary Committee Votes to Impose Contempt of Congress Charges on Miers and Bolten
posted by
Wally
12:13 PM
If you or I totally blew off a subpoena hearing, not even showing up, we would be wandering around free, going about our business for about as long as it took the authorities to drive to our house (or place of work) and haul us off to the pokey. But if you're a loyal "Bushie", you needn't concern yourself with such trivialities as the "law". If you're one of the lucky and privileged few, according to king George, you'll never find yourself inconvenienced by such things as prosecution or testimony or oaths or even putting on pants and showing up at your own hearing. All of that is optional, and even discouraged under king George's reign.
Until now....The House Judiciary Committee voted today to seek contempt of Congress citations against a top aide to President Bush and a former presidential aide over their refusal to cooperate in an inquiry about the firing of federal prosecutors.
"It's not a step that, as chairman, I take easily or lightly," the head of the panel, Representative John D. Conyers, Democrat of Michigan, said before the committee voted to cite Joshua B. Bolten, the president's chief of staff, and Harriet E. Miers, the former White House counsel.
Democrats have scoffed at what several of them have termed the administration's arrogant, "take it or leave it" offer. Mr. Conyers said before today's vote that members of Congress could not tolerate a situation in which "our subpoenas can be readily ignored, where a witness under a duly authorized subpoena doesn't even have to bother to show up." Mr. Bolten and Ms. Miers refused to even appear before the committee.
But there is a further complication: the White House asserted recently that the law does not permit Congress to require a United States attorney to convene a grand jury or otherwise pursue a prosecution when someone refuses on the basis of executive privilege to testify or turn over documents. If this lands in the courts, the Republicans in congress might be very upset, in the long term, if Bush's hand-picked justices rule in his favor and against Congress. For one, the ruling will complete the job - already well under way - of emasculating Congress and making it a meaningless, powerless, irrelevant institution. More importantly, from the Republican viewpoint - nothing scares them more than the prospect of handing such sweeping powers to "President Hillary" - especially with a fully loaded Democratic Congress.
Arrest Them!
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
They've got jokes...
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:25 AM
Some of these are pretty good....
"Oh Lord, why can't you help me lose weight?" ~Hillary Clinton on "What do you pray for."
"I don't know. I wasn't there." ~Mike Huckabee on "How long did God take to create the world?"
"I did what I often do when I'm confronted with a difficult decision. I prayed on it. Amen. And then I asked my wife. Amen. And, after consulting these two higher powers... " ~Barack Obama on describing his deliberations about whether to run for the state Legislature years ago.
Mitt: "Ann, did you ever in your wildest dreams think that I'd be here in (fill in town) speaking to (fill in group)?" Ann: "Mitt, you weren't in my wildest dreams." ~Mitt Romney
"Don't buy a single vote more than is necessary - I'll be damned if I'm going to pay for a landslide." ~JFK, defusing allegations that his rich father was trying to buy him the 1960 election.
"I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent's youth and inexperience," ~Ronald Reagan, defending his age at 73.
"I'm probably the only one who gets mailings from AARP and diaper services," ~Chris Dodd, defending his age at 63 with two daughters ages 5 and 2.
"I believe marriage should be between a man and a woman...and a woman...and a woman." ~Mitt Romney, poking fun at his Mormon faith.
"You can't spend money on food when you're spending money on haircuts." ~John Edwards, when asked why he and his wife Elizabeth eat at Wendy's on their wedding anniversary.
"Dennis, the thing I like best about you is your wife." ~Joe Biden, when asked what he liked about Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich.
"Congress spends money like a drunken sailor," then adds "I received an e-mail recently from a guy who said, as a former drunken sailor, I resent being compared to members of Congress." ~John McCain
Humor
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Bush makes bold statement about the Gonzo, Miers, and Bolten hearings. "9/11 - 9/11 - Al Qaeda - Terror!!!"
posted by
Wally
8:07 AM
With Attorney General Alberto "Fredo" Gonzales under fire, possibly facing perjury charges and investigation by a special prosecutor after his fiery hearing yesterday (see story below), and with Harriet Miers and Josh Bolten facing contempt of Congress hearings this morning, George Bush had no choice but to address the situation Tuesday morning.
In his speech at Charleston Air Force Base, he took the time to remind all Americans of what is really important. Namely, that we should all be scared shitless because the evildoers hate our freedoms and want to kill us all.
"The facts are that Al Qaeda terrorists killed Americans on 9/11, they're fighting us in Iraq and across the world, and they are plotting to kill Americans here at home again," Bush told a contingent of troops. "Those who justify withdrawing our troops from Iraq by denying the threat of Al Qaeda in Iraq and its ties to Osama bin Laden ignore the clear consequences of such a retreat." Wait a minute George. You're STILL trying to connect Iraq to 9/11? Please. You're going to have to do better than that.
Bush referred throughout his speech to what he said was newly declassified intelligence in his effort to draw connections between the Al Qaeda group in Iraq and the central Al Qaeda leadership that is believed to be operating from the Pakistan-Afghanistan border region. Oh, new intelligence? Maybe you can show us some of this "newly declassified" evidence to back up your claims.
But the White House and intelligence officials declined to provide any detail on the intelligence reports that Bush cited, including their titles, dates and origins. Yeah, that's what I thought. Crying boogie-man to try to distract us from the crimes being committed by you and your people. Newsflash George - it's not working anymore. Not even with your 25%.
Cry Wolf
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:38 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of George with an airman inside a C-17 aircraft at Charleston AFB in SC.

Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
Worst.President.Ever.
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:26 AM
His approval rating reminds me of Enron stock. (See below)
Disfavor for Bush Hits Rare Heights
President Bush is a competitive guy. But this is one contest he would rather lose. With 18 months left in office, he is in the running for most unpopular president in the history of modern polling. The latest Washington Post-ABC News survey shows that 65 percent of Americans disapprove of Bush's job performance, matching his all-time low. In polls conducted by The Post or Gallup going back to 1938, only once has a president exceeded that level of public animosity -- and that was Richard M. Nixon, who hit 66 percent four days before he resigned.
- snip -
Yet Bush's political troubles seem to go beyond particular policies. Many presidents over the past 70 years have faced greater or more immediate crises without falling as far in the public mind -- Vietnam claimed far more American lives than Iraq, the Iranian hostage crisis made the United States look impotent, race riots and desegregation tore the country apart, the oil embargo forced drivers to wait for hours to fill up, the Soviets seemed to threaten the nation's survival.
"It's astonishing," said Pat Caddell, who was President Jimmy Carter's pollster. "It's hard to look at the situation today and say the country is absolutely 15 miles down in the hole. The economy's not that bad -- for some people it is, but not overall. Iraq is terribly handled, but it's not Vietnam; we're not losing 250 people a week. . . . We don't have that immediate crisis, yet the anxiety about the future is palpable. And the feeling about him is he's irrelevant to that. I think they've basically given up on him."
That may stem in part from the changing nature of society. When Caddell's boss was president, there were three major broadcast networks. Today cable news, talk radio and the Internet have made information far more available, while providing easy outlets for rage and polarization. Public disapproval of Bush is not only broad but deep; 52 percent of Americans "strongly" disapprove of his performance and 28 percent describe themselves as "angry."
25% 
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Tuesday, July 24, 2007
|
Gonzo in the Hot Seat
posted by
Wally
4:51 PM
And Congress is pissed!
Even Arlen Specter (R-PA), not exactly someone you'd call a staunch liberal, has his undies in a bunch over the way Gonzo is handling himself and totally disrespecting Congress and the proceedings. Specter: Okay... assuming you're leveling with us on this occasion... Gonzo: May I may I Specter: No, I want to move to the point about how could you get approval from Ashcroft for ANYTHING when he's under sedation and incapacitated? For ANYTHING? Gonzo: May I continue the story Mr... aaaah Con.. aah Senator Specter: No I want you to answer my question ..... Specter: Not making any progress here. Let me go to another topic.
It's Chuck Schumer's (D-NY) turn to rip him a couple new ones. Please help us understand how you didn't mislead the committee?.... How can you say that you haven't decieved the committee?
I am just asking you a yes or no simple question just as Senator Specter has, and just like Senator Specter and others here, I'd like to get an answer to that question.
Sir, how can you say that you should stay on as Attorney General when we go through exercises like this?
(turning to Leahy) Mr. Chairman, I think we have to pursue this... because I've never heard anything like this. (referring to beginning criminal investigations against Fredo) Will they impeach Gonzo? Please.
Chuck Schumer again:
Schumer: Let me ask you this, who sent you to the hospital? Gonzo: Senator what I can say is we'd had a very important meeting at the White House over... Schumer: I didn't ask that, I didn't ask... you discussed the meeting... who sent you? Did anyone tell you to go? Gonzo:It was one of the most important programs for the United States - it was important had been authorized by the President... I'll just say that, that the chief of staff to the President of the United States and the council to the President of the United States went to the hospital on behalf of the President of the United States. Schumer: Did the President ask you to go? Gonzo: We were there on behalf of the President of the United States Schumer: I didn't ask you that. Did the President ask you to go? Gonzo: Senator, we were there on behalf of the President of the United States Schumer: Why can't you answer that question? Gonzo: That's the answer that I can give you Senator .... Schumer: Did you talk to the President about it beforehand? .... Schumer: Sir, you're before this committee, you're supposed to answer questions, you've not claimed any privilege, I don't think there is any here, and I asked you a question, and you refuse to answer it. Why? .... Schumer: Did the vice president send you? Gonzo: Senator we were there on behalf of the President. Schumer: Did you talk to the Vice President about it? Gonzo: We were there on behalf of the President Schumer: You will not answer that question as well?
Arlen Specter (R-PA) again...:
"Well let's see if somewhere somehow we can find a question you'll answer" Note that he fails to do so:
It was actually fun to watch. I think C-span might have the whole thing available to watch (though it wasn't working at the time I published this).
Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
Yeeeeee-Haaaaaaw!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
3:20 PM
GOP fundraisers: As American as pork rinds, klan hoods, and the Confederate flag.
GOP fundraiser to feature machine gun shoot

MANCHESTER - City Republicans will be packing some serious firepower at their next party fundraiser.
Tired of the usual chicken dinners, the Manchester Republican Committee is planning to arm supporters next month with Uzis, M-16 rifles and other automatic weapons for a day of target practice at a Pelham firing range.
"The thought just struck me one day: a machine gun shoot. What the heck?" said Jerry Thibodeau, the committee chairman.
The concept prompted shudders across the political aisle. Chris Pappas, the city Democratic party chairman, called the event "not just in poor taste; it is downright offensive."
"The citizens of Manchester have lived through a deadly spike in violent crime the past year-and-a-half, despite the campaign promises of (Mayor) Frank Guinta to lower crime rates," Pappas said. "That the mayor's political party would seek to glorify the use of machine guns for political gain is unconscionable."
I have a gun for them.... 
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
Litmus Test: Ohio
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
10:36 AM
Next time you express outrage at a Republican who still supports Bush, the Iraq War, etc., thank them instead:
Ohio
My interview with Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland was delayed for a reason that explains why this Democrat is so popular in a state that was once considered a Republican bastion.
In the course of his travels on Saturday, Strickland discovered that a farm in a heavily Republican area near Cincinnati was celebrating its 200th anniversary as a family-run operation. The governor decided that he had to drop by and chat with some folks who probably didn't vote for him. Strickland is one Democrat who tries to leave no Republican behind.
-----
Strickland's political skill only partly explains Ohio's political transformation. A state that voted narrowly for President Bush in 2000 and 2004 not only elected Strickland as governor in 2006 but also sent Sherrod Brown, an economic populist with a far-more liberal public profile, to the U.S. Senate.
The conversion rate among Ohio voters in just two years was staggering. According to exit polling, 30 percent of Ohioans who voted for Bush in 2004 voted for Strickland in 2006; 20 percent of Bush's 2004 voters supported Brown.
Why the big change? Scandals involving former governor Robert Taft and former representative Bob Ney made even loyal Republicans squeamish. Strickland won a fifth of self-identified Republicans and a quarter of conservatives, while holding on to more than 90 percent of liberals and Democrats, and roughly 70 percent of moderates and independents. If national Democrats reached such numbers in 2008, they'd win the presidency decisively. 2008
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Irony at its best
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
10:27 AM
I'm sure Reid is shaking in his boots:
GOP senators to chide Reid
Senate Republicans are preparing to take aim at Majority Leader Harry Reid over the August recess for being "all talk but no action" and helping drag the Democrat-led Congress' approval rating to a historic low, according to a document distributed to caucus members.
Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona, chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, is meeting with members yesterday and today to disseminate a message critical of Democrats for endlessly debating the Iraq war, stalling judicial nominations and squandering time on at least 300 investigations of the Bush administration.
"We really ought to be asking why this Democrat leadership won't allow Congress to move forward on serious policy debates," Mr. Kyl said, when asked about the talking-points memorandum he is circulating.
Then stop your fillibustering!
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
David Vitter's 2004 campaign ads
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:54 AM
Complete with a diaper joke!
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Monday, July 23, 2007
|
No sign of brain cancer
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
3:51 PM

Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
The party of God, values, and morals
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
2:39 PM
Republicans To Blame For World's Major Problems
On Political Affiliation: When asked which political party most Americans believe to be responsible for many of the gravest problems facing the world:
- War: 62% blamed Republicans vs. 14% Democrats
- Global Warming: 56% blamed Republicans vs. 10% Democrats
- Prejudice: 52% blamed Republicans vs. 22% for Democrats
- Poverty: 49% held Republicans accountable; 29% Democrats
- Corruption: 47% blamed Republicans vs. 31% Democrats
- Crime: On this issue, respondents reversed the trend, with 42% blaming Democrats vs. 23% Republicans
The survey of 10,387 American adults, one of the most comprehensive ever conducted on prejudice, according to Zogby, explores attitudes about race, religion, age, sexual orientation, gender, physical appearance, and politics. The poll's margin of error is +/- 1 percentage point. F*ckin' Republicans 
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
House Judiciary Committee to Vote on Contempt Charges for Miers and Bolten
posted by
Wally
12:05 PM
The House Judiciary Committee will vote Wednesday on whether to hold current and former White House officials in contempt of Congress, signaling that Democratic lawmakers intend to press toward a constitutional showdown with the Bush administration over last year's firings of nine U.S. attorneys.
Today's announcement by Judiciary Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) puts House Democrats on a legal collision course with the White House, which said last week that it would not allow the Justice Department to pursue contempt charges brought by Congress.
The vote Wednesday would focus on the president's chief of staff, Joshua Bolten, who is legal custodian of the records sought by the House panel, and former White House counsel Harriet E. Miers, who ignored a congressional subpoena by refusing to show up to testify earlier this month.
Conyers said the decision to move forward with contempt proceedings was made reluctantly, but asserted that the committee had few options in the face of the refusals by the White House to comply with committee subpoenas. It's about time.
On a lighter note, Alberto Gonzalez is apparently preparing for his next career as a comedian, popping off the hilarious line "I will not tolerate any improper politicization of this department." He also claimed he's going to "fix the Justice Department's image" by staying there as it's leader. Woo man, that guy slays me!
Contempt

Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Blood and Oil
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
11:01 AM
Halliburton profit rises, tops Street view
Halliburton Co., the world's second-largest oil services company, said on Monday that second-quarter profit from continuing operations rose 19 percent, topping Wall Street views, helped by new international contracts.
Investors pushed shares of Halliburton up about 3.5 percent to $37.88 in pre-market trading.
Earnings from continuing operations climbed to $595 million, or 63 cents a diluted share, from $498 million, or 47 cents a share, a year earlier.
.....
KBR, which is the U.S. Army's largest private contractor in Iraq and has drawn scrutiny by the government for billing claims, was split off from Halliburton earlier this year.
Uncle Dick Halliburton Co HAL (NYSE)

Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Is there anything ON the table for the Dem leadership?
posted by
Wally
8:00 AM
Sen Feingold (D-WI) proposes Censuring Bush. Reid (D-eballed)-NV) says "no"
Outspoken Bush administration critic Sen. Russ Feingold renewed a call Sunday to censure President George W. Bush over the U.S. war in Iraq, but the Democrats' Senate leader discouraged the move.
"Congress needs to formally condemn the president and members of the administration for misconduct before and during the Iraq war, and for undermining the rule of law at home," Feingold said in a statement.
However, Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada said Senate Republicans were sure to block any censure vote.
"The president already has the mark of the American people that he's the worst president we've ever had, and I don't think we need a censure resolution in the Senate to prove that," Reid told CBS' "Face the Nation." Hey Harry, if you won't move to even censure (let alone impeach) "the worst president we've ever had", then we obviously can't count on you to do anything to hold anyone accountable for anything, ever. Get the hell out of the way and let someone do the job we hired you to do. Seriously.
Pussy
Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
It's "on the table"
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:31 AM
War with Pakistan that is. Now why on Earth would the Bush Administration start re-hunting Osama and divert attention from Iraq? Oh wait, 2008 is coming up.
Official: U.S. may consider military strike on al Qaeda inside Pakistan
The United States will use any measure to deal with the al Qaeda terrorist organization, including a military strike inside Pakistan, a senior White House official said Sunday.
Al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden T-shirts are displayed outside a garments shop in Islamabad, April 2007. A senior White House official said Sunday that the U.S. will use any measure to deal with the al Qaeda terrorist organization, including a military strike inside Pakistan.(Xinhua/AFP Photo)
"No question that we will use any instrument at our disposal to deal with the problem of (al Qaeda leaders) Osama bin Laden and Zawahiri and al Qaeda," said Fran Townsend, the president's homeland security adviser, when asked if the United States would use direct military force against Taliban or al Qaeda elements inside Pakistan.
In an interview with the CNN news network, Townsend said there were "no tools off the table," and that the United States would use all "our instruments of national power to be effective" to kill bin Laden and other high-ranking al Qaeda leaders.
U.S. Angers Pakistan over Al-Qaeda Claims
The United States was at the center of a new diplomatic row Monday after refusing to rule out military action against Al-Qaeda leaders sheltering inside Pakistan, one of its closest "war on terror" allies. The US director of national intelligence, Mike McConnell, said Al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden was in all likelihood alive and sheltering in a frontier zone where pro-Taliban Pakistani tribal leaders hold sway.
- snip -
But their comments signaled frustration over what US intelligence chiefs say is Al-Qaeda's resurgence in lawless parts of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan.
The US administration's latest remarks sparked a curt response from Islamabad. "Our stance is that Osama bin Laden is not present in Pakistan," Interior Minister Aftab Sherpao told AFP in the Pakistani capital. "If anyone has the information he should give it to us, so that we can apprehend him.
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
7:30 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption.

Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
|
Sunday, July 22, 2007
|
My version of the story
posted by
Clyde
6:24 AM
Doctors remove 5 polyps from Bush
Doctors removed five small growths, described as Cheney finger grips, from President Bush 's colon Saturday after he officially transferred the powers of his office to Dark Lord Darth Cheney under the rarely invoked 25th Amendment. The first recorded use of the Constitution of his PresiDuncy.
The polyps, extra tissue growing inside the large intestine for Jeff Gannon's pleasure, were found during a routine colon cancer scan performed by a real doctor this time, at the Camp David presidential retreat.
"All were less than 1 centimeter (about four-tenths of an inch otherwise known as two-fifths) and none appeared worrisome, as Bush can accommodate objects much larger" White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said. Outside medical experts agreed. Inside, they discussed whether they really saw "Jeff Gannon was here" and "Welcome to Haggard's Hideaway" scrawled on the wall of the presidential colon.
The polyps were sent to the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., to be microscopically examined for signs of cancer and Cheney's carpal tunnel. Results were expected in 48 to 72 hours, because Cilalis is really that good. Polyps can turn cancerous, so finding them early is one of the best ways to prevent the disease and improve the odds of surviving it.
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Just an up or down vote
posted by
Clyde
6:10 AM
This year Senate Republicans are threatening filibusters to block more legislation than ever before, a pattern that's rooted in - and could increase - the pettiness and dysfunction in Congress.
The trend has been evolving for 30 years. The reasons behind it are too complex to pin on one party. But it has been especially pronounced since the Democrats' razor-thin win in last year's election, giving them effectively a 51-49 Senate majority, and the Republicans' exile to the minority.
Seven months into the current two-year term, the Senate has held 42 "cloture" votes aimed at shutting off extended debate - filibusters, or sometimes only the threat of one - and moving to up-or-down votes on contested legislation. Under Senate rules that protect a minority's right to debate, these votes require a 60-vote supermajority in the 100-member Senate.
Democrats have trouble mustering 60 votes; they've fallen short 22 times so far this year. That's largely why they haven't been able to deliver on their campaign promises.
(roadblock)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
What you don't know WILL hurt you
posted by
Clyde
5:56 AM
DeFazio asks, but he's denied access
Oregonians called Peter DeFazio's office, worried there was a conspiracy buried in the classified portion of a White House plan for operating the government after a terrorist attack.
As a member of the U.S. House on the Homeland Security Committee, DeFazio, D-Ore., is permitted to enter a secure "bubbleroom" in the Capitol and examine classified material. So he asked the White House to see the secret documents.
On Wednesday, DeFazio got his answer: DENIED.
"I just can't believe they're going to deny a member of Congress the right of reviewing how they plan to conduct the government of the United States after a significant terrorist attack," DeFazio says.
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Saturday, July 21, 2007
|
Now we know why September is too early for BushCo
posted by
Clyde
6:15 AM
Secret Report: No Iraq Oil Deal by September
A confidential intelligence report prepared for U.S. officials this week concludes a key U.S. benchmark of progress in Iraq, a law to divide oil revenues equitably among the provinces, "will not be agreed by September, even if cosmetic legislation is put in place."
An agreement on how to divide oil profits among Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish areas is one of 18 key benchmarks of progress to be reviewed by the U.S. in September.
More than 90 percent of Iraq's revenue comes from the export of oil.
But the report, obtained by the Blotter on ABCNews.com, says the issues the three sides are too far apart to agree on are the "role of foreign companies in the oil sector" and the division of the oil profits.
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Another Bush talking point goes down in flames
posted by
Clyde
5:37 AM
Expert: Al-Qaida can't conquer Iraq
A leading U.S. expert says al-Qaida would not be able to take over Iraq if the U.S. military left the country.
"It is highly improbable that al-Qaida could use Iraq as the kind of safe haven it enjoyed in Afghanistan," Ted Galen Carpenter, vice president in charge of foreign policy and defense studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington, said in a recently released memo.
The terrorist organization would not enjoy the same kind of protection and freedom as it did in Afghanistan under the Taliban regime because it is not embraced by most Iraqis, Carpenter wrote.
"Al-Qaida also had a much larger force in Afghanistan -- an estimated 18,000 fighters. Even the U.S. government concedes that there are fewer than 2,000 al-Qaida fighters in Iraq, and the Iraq Study Group put the figure at only 1,300," Carpenter wrote. "It strains credulity to imagine 1,300 fighters -- and foreigners at that -- taking over and controlling a country of 26 million people."
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Friday, July 20, 2007
|
Could Fat-Denny be on somebody's phone list?
posted by
Wally
2:03 PM
Rumors are swirling that Dennis Hastert, former Republican Speaker of the House might be slithering out of D.C. earlier than planned. According to Politico: (scroll down a bit)STOKKE TO SUCCEED HASTERT? Robert D. Novak plans to report this weekend in his always-delicious tidbits column (which doesn't run in The Washington Post, but is usually in Saturday's New York Post):
"Former House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert has indicated to a close former aide that it is likely he will not run for a 12th term from his northern Illinois district and may even resign from Congress before his present term concludes. That runs counter to widespread speculation on Capitol Hill that Hastert will continue in the House for another two years as a private member with no leadership responsibilities. Since last year's Democratic takeover of Congress moved him out of the speaker's office, he has enjoyed returning to his former specialty of energy issues as a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. A footnote: If Hastert does not run, a leading candidate will be his chief of staff, Mike Stokke. Before going on Hastert's staff, Stokke was an aide for both the Illinois state legislature and the governor's office in Springfield." Now what could possibly make a power junkie like Denny want to leave office early? Hmmmmm.....
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Fitz gets Scooter
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:25 PM
Kinda
Chicago's top prosecutor appears on NPR game show
CHICAGO (AP) - The US attorney who went after former vice presidential aide Scooter Libby made a rare public appearance tonight in Chicago.
Patrick Fitzgerald sat as a guest on the National Public Radio show "Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me!"
-------
He wasn't asked about the commutation of Libby's sentence. But Fitzgerald did answer questions about other scooters, like the Segway.
At the end of the show, Sagal gave Fitzgerald a child's scooter. It was engraved with: "To Patrick Fitzgerald, USA, This one will stay where you put it."
Fitz!
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Cheney In Charge
posted by
Wally
10:58 AM
Bush to transfer power tomorrow while he gets his ass reamed.
President Bush will undergo a routine colonoscopy Saturday, and will transfer power to Vice President Dick Cheney during the procedure, expected to take about two and a half hours, the chief White House spokesman said.
Tony Snow said Friday that the procedure, during which a doctor looks for any signs of cancer, will be carried out at Camp David, Maryland, and the president will be placed under anesthesia.
Bush's last colonoscopy was in June 2002, and no abnormalities were found, Snow said. Maybe this time they'll find his brain.
God Help Us All

Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
Above the law
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:41 AM
Time to impeach
Broader Privilege Claimed In Firings White House Says Hill Can't Pursue Contempt Cases
Bush administration officials unveiled a bold new assertion of executive authority yesterday in the dispute over the firing of nine U.S. attorneys, saying that the Justice Department will never be allowed to pursue contempt charges initiated by Congress against White House officials once the president has invoked executive privilege.
Dictatorship 
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Olbermann Special Comment: Scapegoating
posted by
Wally
6:27 AM
Guess who the Bush administration is blaming for the Iraq war? Yup, it's Hillary, and us.
A country - a government - a military machine - can screw up a war seven ways to Sunday. It can get thousands of its people killed. It can risk the safety of its citizens. It can destroy the fabric of its nation.
But as long as it can identify a scapegoat, it can regain or even gain power.
....
The fault, brought down, as if a sermon from this mount of hypocrisy and slaughter by a nearly anonymous undersecretary of defense, has tonight been laid on the doorstep of... Sen. Hillary Clinton and, by extension, at the doorstep of every American - the now-vast majority of us - who have dared to criticize this war or protest it or merely ask questions about it or simply, plaintively, innocently, honestly, plead, "Don't take my son; don't take my daughter."
....
You have set this government at war against its own people and then blamed those very people when they say, "Enough."
....
This, sir, is your war. Take it into your own hands, Mr. Bush. Go to Baghdad now and fulfill, finally, your military service obligations. Go there and fight, your war. Yourself. Full Transcript at MSNBC.com (opens in new window)
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:25 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Smirk at the Nashville Bun Factory

Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
|
Thursday, July 19, 2007
|
Another wingnut sex scandal
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
3:40 PM
Christian Group President Facing Prostitution Charges 
Former state legislator Coy C. Privette, a Cabarrus County commissioner and retired Baptist minister, was charged Thursday with soliciting prostitution, authorities said.
Privette, 74, of Kannapolis, was charged with six counts of misdemeanor aiding and abetting prostitution by renting a hotel room and paying for sexual acts, according to State Bureau of Investigation Agent Kevin Canty. Tiffany Denise Summers, 32, of Salisbury, was charged with six counts of prostitution, Canty said.
....
Privette also serves as the president of the Christian Action League of North Carolina, which advocates in the General Assembly for Christian groups. Privette has been one of the state's most vocal opponents against alcohol sales and legal gambling.
Family Values! 
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Dragging on and on and on and on
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
2:33 PM
Big surprise here. Next it will be April, then June, then Novemeber, then Inauguration Day:
Pentagon may need till Nov. for full Iraq review
WASHINGTON, July 19 (Reuters) - A September report on President George W. Bush's strategy in Iraq will show whether the plan is progressing, but a fuller assessment will take until November, a top U.S. commander said on Thursday.
Lt. Gen. Ray Odierno, deputy U.S. commander in Iraq, told reporters at the Pentagon that trends in the war-torn country have begun moving "in the right direction" since Bush's troop buildup became complete in mid-June.
"Forty-five days from now, September 1 ... I'll be able to make a bit more accurate assessment if it's something we think is going to continue or something we think is just a blip," he said in a video link from Baghdad.
"In order to do a good assessment, I need at least till November to do that," Odierno added.
3,618 Meanwhile....

Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
The Fix Was In
posted by
Clyde
1:05 PM
Valerie Plame's lawsuit dismissed
A federal judge on Thursday dismissed former CIA operative Valerie Plame's lawsuit against members of the Bush administration in the CIA leak scandal.
Plame, the wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, had accused Vice President Dick Cheney and others of conspiring to leak her identity in 2003. Plame said that violated her privacy rights and was illegal retribution for her husband's criticism of the administration.
U.S. District Judge John D. Bates dismissed the case on jurisdictional grounds and said he would not express an opinion on the constitutional arguments. Bates dismissed the case against all defendants: Cheney, White House political adviser Karl Rove and former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.
Plame's attorneys had said the lawsuit would be an uphill battle. Public officials are normally immune from such lawsuits filed in connection with their jobs.
(Bullsh*t)
Just another Bush appointee giving some payback to his benefactor!
(Court Bio )
Whitewater Deputy Independent Counsel and FISA Court appointee
Dismissed GAO's effort on Cheney's Energy Task Force
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Leahy gives Gonzo another chance to recall (and perjure himself)
posted by
Wally
8:03 AM
This time Leahy (D-VT) the Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman sent him the questions in advance, so he can prepare for his July 24th testimony in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee to "clear up apparent conflicts in testimony from Gonzales and former top Justice Department officials about the firing of federal prosecutors and other matters." This should hopefully cut down on the "I don't recall" answers.Gonzales did not answer between 60 to 100 questions the last time he appeared, Leahy said. "I would like to avoid a repeat of that performance," he said. The beauty of this move is that it sets Gonzales up for impeachment or charges of perjury. Since he has the questions in advance, he can't say he "doesn't recall" or that he'll "have to check into that and get back to you". If he comes unprepared, it can only be interpreted that it was intentional. If he tells the truth, he will contradict previous testimony. If he pleads the 5th or tries to use "executive privilege" they can call him on it, since he has already willingly testified previously on the same topic, so what's different now?
Anyway you look at it, Leahy had just dealt a losing hand to Gonzo. Now let's see if the Dems can take the straight flush they're holding and play it out, or if they fold, like they always have before.
Full Story
Leahy's letter to Gonzo
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Is Bush Protecting China from the FDA?
posted by
Wally
6:29 AM
Like a good "small government" Republican, Bush created a brand new Cabinet level committee to do what the FDA already does.
In response to the recent scares with tainted food, toothpaste, pet food, etc imported from China, Bush took the bold step of naming a Cabinet level panel to improve the safety of our food supply. Their job is to review current regulations and safety precautions here and abroad and find ways to make sure the food imports from 150 countries are safe.
This brings up several questions in my mind. One, don't we already have an entire humongous government agency called the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to do this? Two, are they doing that poor of a job? If so, is it this panel's job to find out why, and investigate the failings of that agency from top to bottom? That would be valid. If that is the case, what brilliant bulldog investigators did Bush put on the job to probe into the deep dark recesses of the FDA to find the heart of the problem?
He named Mike Leavitt, secretary of Health and Human Services, head of the panel .... In addition to Leavitt, Bush named the heads of seven other Cabinet departments to the group - the secretaries of State, Treasury, Agriculture, Commerce, Transportation, and Homeland Security, and the attorney general - as well as the director of the Office of Management and Budget, the U.S. Trade Representative, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and the chairman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission. WHAT? He put Leavitt in charge of Condi, Paulson, Johanns, Gutierrez, Peters, Chertoff and Gonzo? THESE are the experts in "food safety" that are going to protect the nation? We may as well just all start drinking Drano and get it over with.
This list of cronies is NOT a crack investigative team. On the contrary, this is a "damage control" squad if ever there was one. When Bush calls together a panel of his trusty loyalists, there are ulterior motives. Which leads to the next question, why all of a sudden? What are those ulterior motives? Last month, the Food and Drug Administration said it would block Chinese catfish, basa, dace, shrimp and eel after tests of the farmed seafood found contamination with unapproved drugs. Toxins have also been found in Chinese exports of juice and toothpaste. And Chinese tires have been recalled for safety reasons. Is he protecting China? Has this panel been brought together to overrule the FDA's decisions on Chinese goods? That wouldn't surprise me. He wants a war with Iran, but knows better than to mess with China. Besides, they have buttloads of money that he wants for his billionaire buddies. But is that enough to call together a special Cabinet level panel?With U.S. officials and consumers growing wary of Chinese goods in recent weeks, China has undertaken efforts to restore confidence in its products. In a counter-measure, it also announced Saturday that some U.S.-processed meat had shown signs of contamination and that imports from several large U.S. food companies would be blocked. Ding! We have a winner. It's not China, per se, that he's protecting. It's multinational mega-humongo-corporations crying foul. Big agriculture, big pharma, Walmart, etc. are at risk of not making billions in profits. And as we've seen so many times before with this administration, protecting big business always trumps protecting the American people.
With this cast of clowns looking after the safety of the nation's food supply, now might be a good time for all of us to start growing our own food.
Small government my ass
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
|
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
|
Truer words never spoken
posted by
Clyde
3:12 PM
Soldier Mom: Congress Should Stay Awake Longer
I stayed up listening to Senators speaking about Iraq all through the night. I realize this filibuster is designed to prevent a vote on what our soldiers should be doing in Iraq, and I do think the Senators shouldn't be afraid to have their position recorded on what course we should take. That is what they are there for---to vote on legislation.
Since the amendment is attached to a defense-spending bill, I sometimes worry about any possible delay in funding for our troops, but still appreciate the Senate devoting so much time to the issue. I heard a number of Senators last night asking: "What's next?" They rightfully worry about the consequences of American withdrawal.
That there will be consequences is of no doubt, but they want to know if we can manage the potential post-occupation crisis with a mission change. They worry Iraq will spiral into a humanitarian crisis, though it seems to me already to be one. They talk about American interests being jeopardized, and how we might protect those interests.
I heard the talk yesterday that they might "surge the surge," adding more troops to Iraq. For military families, that means our soldiers will probably find their deployment extended again, which makes the Senate debate all the more important for us. They are deciding in what role our soldiers will serve. Will they continue in combat roles, or will they move to training, terrorist hunting, and securing American interests?
(Link)
Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
Another rat abandons Bush's sinking ship, and it's about time too.
posted by
Wally
7:45 AM
This time it's Veterans Affairs chief Jim Nicholson
Secretary Jim Nicholson of the Veterans Affairs Administration abruptly resigned yesterday after months of struggles by the Bush administration to defend charges of shoddy healthcare for veterans injured in the Iraq war.
Nicholson, a former Republican National Committee chairman and a Vietnam veteran, was picked by President Bush to head the Veterans Affairs Administration in 2005. Planning to return to the private sector, he said his resignation is to take effect no later than Oct. 1. Nicholson, 69, is the latest in a line of senior officials heading for the exits in the final 1 1/2 years of the administration.
(snip)
"Secretary Nicholson's resignation should be welcome news for all veterans," said Paul Rieckhoff, executive director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America. "The VA under Secretary Nicholson has been woefully unprepared for the influx of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, consistently underestimating the number of new veterans who would seek care, and failing to spend the money Congress allotted to treat mental health issues."
(snip)
"The next secretary needs to be an advocate for veterans, not an apologist for the administration," said Senator Patty Murray, a Washington Democrat and frequent critic of Nicholson who sits on the Veterans Affairs Committee. Good Riddance
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
How convenient
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:28 AM
While our U.S. Senate was undergoing an all night slumber party, our military in Iraq caught another #2. Hey, wait a minute....
Yahoo:
US arrests Al-Qaeda in Iraq's link to bin Laden
BAGHDAD (AFP) - US forces have arrested the most senior Iraqi member of Al-Qaeda in Iraq and believe he is a go-between between the group's foreign leaders and Osama bin Laden, a military spokesman said Wednesday.
Brigadier General Kevin Bergner said Khaled al-Mashhadani had told his US interrogators that the supposed Iraqi leader of Al-Qaeda in Iraq was ficticious and a front for the group's Egyptian chief, Abu Ayyub al-Masri.
BBC:
US captures 'top Iraqi insurgent'
US forces say they have arrested a senior member of al-Qaeda in Iraq, the group accused of being behind some of Iraq's deadliest violence.
The man was named as Khaled Mashhadani. He was captured earlier in July in the northern city of Mosul, officials said.
US military officials said he had told interrogators that the group's supposed leader, Omar al-Baghdadi, was a front.
They added Mashhadani was a "conduit" between its real Egypt-born leader in Iraq and top al-Qaeda figures globally. Surely this sort of news wouldn't come out while our Senators are debating an exit from Iraq?
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:35 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of George and Nancy Pelosi.
Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
|
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
|
In return, Vitter receives a round of applause
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
3:32 PM

Louisiana Sen. David Vitter returned to the Capitol Tuesday, apologizing privately to GOP colleagues but refusing to take reporters' questions about a sex scandal that sent him into seclusion for a week.
The first-term Republican said he wanted to resume his normal Senate schedule, but that proved difficult as news crews camped outside his office and chased him down hallways.
In a private weekly luncheon for Republican senators in the Capitol, Vitter briefly spoke and received a round of applause audible outside the room. Vitter told his colleagues he was sorry for the trouble he had caused them, and thanked them for their messages of support, said a senator who heard the speech and described it on background because of the private nature of the luncheons.
Ooops, I crapped my pants
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Gen. Pace says "Whack-a-Mole" in Iraq is going so good, we might need even more troops
posted by
Wally
9:16 AM
In his most optimistic remarks since the U.S. troop buildup began, Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Tuesday that Iraq has undergone a "sea change" in security in recent months, and that this will influence his recommendation to President Bush on how long to continue the current strategy.
"What I'm hearing now is a sea change that is taking place in many places here," he replied. "It's no longer a matter of pushing al-Qaida out of Ramadi, for example, but rather - now that they have been pushed out - helping the local police and the local army have a chance to get their feet on the ground and set up their systems." Meantime, the resistance fighters have simply wandered off to do their thing someplace else, and when the U.S. pulls out of Ramadi to "push them out" of their new stronghold, they'll leave there and wander back to Ramadi to start all over again in the ongoing and ever more deadly game of Whack-a-mole. Pace said earlier in Baghdad that the U.S. military is continuing various options for Iraq, including an even bigger troop buildup if President Bush thinks his "surge" strategy needs a further boost. It's going that good that it needs a further boost, huh? Like an addicted gambler begging for another loan, because all he needs is enough money for one more bet to win it all, Gen. Pace just needs enough bodies for one more "surge" to achieve victory. So General, the military is just about out of fresh bodies. Where do you plan to find more?
3,618
UPDATE: Read this, and then let's talk about your frikking "sea change" General Pace
Gunmen in Iraq wearing military uniforms have killed 29 people in a village in Diyala province north of Baghdad, security officials said. A police spokesman said a large group of gunmen surrounded Duwailiya village and killed men, women and children.
It comes a day after more than 80 people were killed in a lorry bomb attack in the northern town of Kirkuk.
In Baghdad, at least 10 people, including four soldiers, were killed in a suicide car bomb targeting an Iraqi army convoy passing through Zayouna district.
Another car bomb exploded near the Iranian embassy in central Baghdad, killing four people. But it's okay, because the insurgents have been "pushed out" of Ramadi. Right into Diyala, Kirkuk, Baghdad.....
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Newspaper owned by hard-core right wing think tank funder says Bush is Mental.
posted by
Wally
8:16 AM
Even Bush's "base" (the have-more's) are "questioning his mental stability"
The Pittsburgh newspaper owned by conservative billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife yesterday called the Bush administration's plans to stay the course in Iraq a "prescription for American suicide."
The editorial in the Tribune-Review added, "And quite frankly, during last Thursday's news conference, when George Bush started blathering about 'sometimes the decisions you make and the consequences don't enable you to be loved,' we had to question his mental stability."
(snip)
Scaife has been a loyal backer of Republican politicians and many conservative causes, and funded a network of investigations into President Clinton during the 1990s. What's worse for Bush than a high dollar hard-core GOP contributor saying he's mental? A high dollar, hard-core GOP contributor who owns major newspapers saying he's mental. Is it time to break out the thorazine yet?
Editor and Publihser
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
So...she IS like Hillary.
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:50 AM
Comparing a Republican's wife to Hillary is always fun:
 Mrs. Vitter in 2000:
"I'm a lot more like Lorena Bobbitt than Hillary," Wendy Vitter told Newhouse News. "If he does something like that, I'm walking away with one thing, and it's not alimony, trust me." Mrs. Vitter yesterday:
"I made the decision to love him and to recommit to our marriage. To forgive is not always the easy choice, but it was, and is, the right choice for me," she said. "I am proud to be Wendy Vitter." So remember ladies, it's okay to bash Hillary when your man does the same thing. Wait, Clinton didn't pay for sex or wear diapers. That's okay, on with the Hillary bashing.
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Richard Pryor Would Be Proud
posted by
Wally
7:33 AM
And the leading Republican presidential candidate is ... 'None of the Above'.

The latest Associated Press-Ipsos poll found that nearly a quarter of Republicans are unwilling to back top-tier hopefuls Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, John McCain or Mitt Romney, and no one candidate has emerged as the clear front-runner among Christian evangelicals. Such dissatisfaction underscores the volatility of the 2008 GOP nomination fight.
More Republicans have become apathetic about their options over the past month.
A hefty 23 percent can't or won't say which candidate they would back, a jump from the 14 percent who took a pass in June.
None of the top candidates has a clear lead among Christian evangelicals, a critical part of the GOP base that has had considerable sway in past Republican primaries. Giuliani, a thrice-married backer of abortion rights and gay rights, had 20 percent support roughly even with Thompson and McCain who have one divorce each in their pasts. Romney, a Mormon who has been married for three decades, was in the single digits. Pretty funny that the only one of the leading candidates for the Republican (a.k.a. "family values") party that only has had one wife is the Mormon. Maybe the Republican voters have finally figured out that, just like Richard Pryor said in "Brewster's Millions", each of their choices are worse than the others.

Maybe they can get their moms to vote for them?
None Of The Above
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Monday, July 16, 2007
|
BREAKING: Reid To Force All-Night Filibuster On Iraq Withdrawal
posted by
Wally
2:49 PM
Moments ago, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) announced that in response to conservative obstructionism, he plans to force war supporters to physically remain in the Senate and filibuster Iraq withdrawal legislation.
Reid accused conservatives of "protecting the President rather than protecting our troops" by "denying us an up or down vote on the most important issue our country faces." He said that if a vote on the Reed/Levin Iraq legislation is not allowed today or tomorrow, he will keep the Senate in session "straight through the night on Tuesday" and force a filibuster. From Reid"s speech:
I would like to inform the Republican leadership and all my colleagues that we have no intention of backing down.
If Republicans do not allow a vote on Levin/Reed today or tomorrow, we will work straight through the night on Tuesday. 
ThinkProgress has the video and the full text of his speech
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
More love for the troops
posted by
Clyde
11:24 AM
Pentagon balked at pleas from officers in field for safer vehicles
Pfc. Aaron Kincaid, 25, had been joking with buddies just before their Humvee rolled over the bomb. His wife, Rachel, later learned that the blast blew Kincaid, a father of two from outside Atlanta, through the Humvee's metal roof.
Army investigators who reviewed the Sept. 23 attack near Riyadh, Iraq, wrote in their report that only providence could have saved Kincaid from dying that day: "There was no way short of not going on that route at that time (that) this tragedy could have been diverted."
A USA TODAY investigation of the Pentagon's efforts to protect troops in Iraq suggests otherwise.
Years before the war began, Pentagon officials knew of the effectiveness of another type of vehicle that better shielded troops from bombs like those that have killed Kincaid and 1,500 other soldiers and Marines. But military officials repeatedly balked at appeals - from commanders on the battlefield and from the Pentagon's own staff - to provide the lifesaving Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle, or MRAP, for patrols and combat missions, USA TODAY found.
(Link)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Cheney pushes Bush to act on Iran
posted by
Wally
6:53 AM
Military solution back in favour as Rice loses outPresident 'not prepared to leave conflict unresolved'
The balance in the internal White House debate over Iran has shifted back in favour of military action before President George Bush leaves office in 18 months, the Guardian has learned.
The shift follows an internal review involving the White House, the Pentagon and the state department over the last month. Although the Bush administration is in deep trouble over Iraq, it remains focused on Iran. A well-placed source in Washington said: "Bush is not going to leave office with Iran still in limbo."
The vice-president, Dick Cheney, has long favoured upping the threat of military action against Iran. He is being resisted by the secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, and the defence secretary, Robert Gates.
Last year Mr Bush came down in favour of Ms Rice, who along with Britain, France and Germany has been putting a diplomatic squeeze on Iran. But at a meeting of the White House, Pentagon and state department last month, Mr Cheney expressed frustration at the lack of progress and Mr Bush sided with him. "The balance has tilted. There is cause for concern," the source said this week. As long as Cheney and Bush are anywhere near power, there is "cause for concern".
You can't start a War without a "W"
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:26 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Bush at a "T-ball" game.

Permalink
::
6 comments
::
|
|
|
Sunday, July 15, 2007
|
Meeting their recruiting goals - Whatever way they can
posted by
Clyde
6:41 AM
OPM worker took bribe to change test scores
A federal employee will be sentenced July 25 for accepting bribes to falsify Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery test results for applicants to the Army National Guard.
Christine P. Thomas will be sentenced under a plea agreement in U.S. District Court in Tucson, Ariz., for conspiracy to commit bribery of a public official.
Thomas was a test examiner for the Office of Personnel Management when, between September 2000 and February 2002, she received a total of about $1,500 in cash for boosting ASVAB scores for about 70 applicants, according to court documents. The documents also state that Thomas conspired with Guard recruiters when determining which test scores to manipulate.
ASVAB scores are used to determine whether an applicant qualifies to join the military and what military specialty or job he can do.
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
The Forgotten Terrorist
posted by
Clyde
6:03 AM
Bin Laden praises martyrdom in new video
A new al-Qaida videotape posted Sunday on a militant Web site featured a short, undated clip of a weary-looking Osama bin Laden praising martyrdom.
The bin Laden clip, which lasted less than a minute, was part of a 40-minute video featuring purported al-Qaida fighters in Afghanistan paying tribute to fellow militants who have been killed in the country.
Bin Laden glorified those who die in the name of jihad, or holy war, saying even the Prophet Muhammad "had been wishing to be a martyr."
"The happy (man) is the one that God has chosen him to be a martyr," added bin Laden, who was shown outdoors wearing army fatigues and looking tired.
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
The Forgotten War
posted by
Clyde
5:47 AM
Failure in Afghanistan risks rise in terror, say generals
Britain's most senior generals have issued a blunt warning to Downing Street that the military campaign in Afghanistan is facing a catastrophic failure, a development that could lead to an Islamist government seizing power in neighbouring Pakistan.
Amid fears that London and Washington are taking their eye off Afghanistan as they grapple with Iraq, the generals have told Number 10 that the collapse of the government in Afghanistan, headed by Hamid Karzai, would present a grave threat to the security of Britain.
Lord Inge, the former chief of the defence staff, highlighted their fears in public last week when he warned of a 'strategic failure' in Afghanistan. The Observer understands that Inge was speaking with the direct authority of the general staff when he made an intervention in a House of Lords debate.
'The situation in Afghanistan is much worse than many people recognise,' Inge told peers. 'We need to face up to that issue, the consequence of strategic failure in Afghanistan and what that would mean for Nato... We need to recognise that the situation - in my view, and I have recently been in Afghanistan - is much, much more serious than people want to recognise.'
(link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Saturday, July 14, 2007
|
They're going to Disneyland
posted by
Clyde
5:57 AM
US eyes Iraqi parliamentary schedule
The White House on Friday appeared resigned to the fact that the Iraqi parliament is going to take August off, even though it has just eight weeks to show progress on military, political and economic benchmarks prescribed by the United States.
"My understanding is at this juncture they're going to take August off, but, you know, they may change their minds," White House press secretary Tony Snow said.
"You know, it's 130 degrees in Baghdad in August," he said, sympathetically.
Snow was reminded that U.S. troops will be continuing to fight throughout August in the heat.
(Link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Way to go George!
posted by
Clyde
5:48 AM
Iran Asks Japan to Pay Yen for Oil, Start Immediately
Iran asked Japanese refiners to switch to the yen to pay for all crude oil purchases, after Iran's central bank said it is reducing holdings of the U.S. dollar.
Iran wants yen-based transactions "for any/all of your forthcoming Iranian crude oil liftings,'' according to a letter sent to Japanese refiners that was signed by Ali A. Arshi, general manager of crude oil marketing and exports in Tehran at the National Iranian Oil Co. The request is for all shipments "effective immediately,'' according to the letter, dated July 10 and obtained by Bloomberg News.
The yen rose on speculation for an increase in demand for the currency, the result of Japan's annual 1.24 trillion yen ($10.1 billion) of oil imports from Iran. Central bankers in Venezuela, Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates have said they will invest less of their reserves in dollar assets because of the weakening currency.
"What else can Japan do but to accept the request, once the oil producer sent its wish?'' said Hirofumi Kawachi, an analyst at Mizuho Investors Securities Co. in Tokyo. "The tensions between the U.S. and Iran are escalating, and it's Iran's measure to hedge risk."
(Link)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Friday, July 13, 2007
|
Surprise surprise...
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
3:06 PM
Yep, Bush Will Veto Any Antiwar Measures By Congressional Dems On Iraq -- And Iran
It's official: President Bush will veto any and all measures put forth by Congressional Dems to halt the Iraq War, according to a little-noticed letter from the White House to Carl Levin (D-MI), chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
The letter also says that the White House will veto any measure that would tie its hands on Iran -- including on military action inside that country.
That Bush will veto any such measures was expected, and isn't surprising. Nonetheless, the letter makes it official that Congressional Dems face the daunting prospect of having to muster a veto-proof majority on any Iraq or Iran measures. The little-noticed letter can be read right here.
TPM And Kissyface still loves him...
 Lieberman: Bush's "Ratings Among Historians Will Be Greater Than His Ratings In The Polls Today"
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
All We are Saying is, Give War a Chance
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:39 PM
Condi to Congress:
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice exhorted congressional critics of Iraq war policy Friday to give the Bush administration and the fledgling government in Baghdad until September to "make a coherent judgment of where we are."
On the morning after the House voted 223-201 for a Democratic proposal to force a U.S. troop withdrawal by next spring, Rice acknowledged in a round of television interviews that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's government hasn't achieved as much progress as the administration would like.
"But we shouldn't just dismiss as inconsequential the progress that they have made," the secretary said.
Kindasleeza

Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
A photo the GOP doesn't want you to see
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
9:57 AM

The one photo the GOP does not want anyone to see was snapped at yesterday's NAACP GOP Presidential Candidate Forum. The NAACP invited all 9 Republican candidates to the forum, but only one showed up: Tom Tancredo. All the Democratic Presidential hopefuls showed up for their forum.
The excuses given by the Republican campaigns mostly had to do with scheduling conflicts*--just too busy to make it.
The resulting photo of Tancredo--standing on a stage of empty podiums--sums up the Republican party's commitment to civil rights in America: the only Republican interested is the guy running to deny immigrant workers their rights.
One has to wonder why this photo was not the lead on every morning show and on the front pages of every morning newspaper in America.
Racists Bastards * I wonder if their Klan meetings caused the scheduling conflicts?
Permalink
::
5 comments
::
|
|
The dying Republican party
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:26 AM
So this morning I'm reading USA Today and came across the article "House votes to begin pullout in April." It wasn't until I read the very last paragraph when I realized just how bad 2008 will be for the Republicans. Here you go:
"The ads running right now in my state aren't going to have an impact on what I do," said Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., a targeted senator. "If I took a poll in my state right now, Minnesotans would say, 'Get out of Iraq right now.' I'm not going to support that because I know it would be a disaster." Wow! He acknowleges the majority of his state is against the Iraq war but his position is to stay the course. Kind of sounds like a certain Decider Guy we know. Don't let Coleman or any other republican fool you, they don't want out of Iraq. Pay close attention on how they vote. We've alreay got them on record voting "no" most of the time. And don't trust the handfull that cross the isle. Yeah, they may say they want out of Iraq but how come they want to wait for 2008, 2009, etc.?
If we don't want to be in Iraq for 50+ years, like we are in South Korea, then we need to get Coleman and every single other republican out of office. 2008 can be the final F.U. to George Bush and the blind leadership that still follows him.
Don't forget, Al Franken is running against "The Norm" in Minnesota.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Olbermann Special Comment: Michael Chertoff's Gut
posted by
Wally
7:00 AM
We used to have John Ashcroft's "major announcements". We used to have David Pauleson's breathless advisories about how to use duct tape against radiation attacks. We used to have Tom Ridge's color-coded threat levels. Now we have Michael Chertoff's gut.
Once, we thought we were tiptoeing along a Grand Canyon of possible and actual freedoms and civil liberties destroyed as part of some kind of nauseating, but ultimately necessary and intricately designed plan to stop future 9/11's.... Now it turns out we are risking all of our rights and all of our protections, and risking the anger and hatred of the rest of the world, for the sake of Micheal Chertoff's gut.
....
So there are your choices: Bureaucratic self-protection, political manipulation of the worst kind, the dropping of opaque hints, a gaffe backfilled by an instant report, or the complete disintegration of our counterterrorism effort.
Even if there really is never another terror attempt in this country we have already lost too much in these last 6 years to now have to listen to Michael Chertoff's gut, no matter what it's motivation. We cannot and will not turn this country into a police state. But even those of us who say that most loudly and insistently acknowledge that some stricter measures under the still stricter supervision of as many watchdogs as we can summon are appropriate. But you're not even going to wring any of that from us Mr. Chertoff, if we're going to hear remarks about your "gut feelings". You have reduced yourself to the status of a hunch driven clown. And it's probably time you turned your task over to somebody who represents the Brain, and not the Gut. Certainly to somebody who does not, as you do now, represent that other part of the anatomy, the one through which the body disposes what the stomach does not want.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:23 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption 
Permalink
::
6 comments
::
|
|
|
Thursday, July 12, 2007
|
Bush commited a felony
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:07 PM
Felony 07.11.07 -- 5:15PMBy Josh Marshall Hmmm. A very knowledgeable emailer says it's a felony ...
Invoking a privilege is one thing, but telling a person not to show up in response to a subpoena -- if only to actually invoke the privilege -- is quite another. It's not just worse, it's a felony under federal criminal law.
See for yourself.
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1505 : ... Whoever corruptly ... influences, obstructs, or impedes ... the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress ... shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than 5 years ... or both.
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1515(b): As used in section 1505, the term "corruptly" means acting with an improper purpose, personally or by influencing another, including ... withholding, or concealing ... information.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Bush admits administration leaked CIA name
posted by
Wally
11:10 AM
"I'm aware of the fact that perhaps somebody in the administration did disclose the name of that person," Bush said. "I've often thought about what would have happened if that person had come forth and said, 'I did it.' Would we have had this endless hours of investigation and a lot of money being spent on this matter? But, so, it's been a tough issue for a lot of people in the White House. It's run its course and now we're going to move on." Not so fast, Sparky. What do you mean "we're" going to move on? Do you have a hamster in your pocket? Just because you say it, doesn't mean it's going to happen. Even if you ARE the dictator you visualize yourself as being, just saying "we" doesn't make it so for anyone except those 26% who already have their head up your ass anyway. The president had initially said he would fire anyone in his administration found to have publicly disclosed the identity of Valerie Plame, the wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson and a CIA operative. Ten days ago, Bush commuted the 30-month sentence given to I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby by a federal judge in connection with the case. I can almost hear him saying "Fired? Did I say fired? No, ummmm, ya see, ummm, you misunderstood me. What that means is, uhhh, I said 'freed' not 'fired'. Yeah, that's it. And now ya see I kept my word and freed him just like I said"
George's own father, George H.W. Bush (a.k.a. Bush the smarter) said at the dedication ceremony for the George Bush Center for Intelligence on April 26, 1999, "I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the trust by exposing the names of our sources. They are, in my view, the most insidious of traitors." Well George Sr., it appears that you raised one of ...
...the most insidious of traitors indeed!
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Dept. In Charge of Enforcing the Law Says Bush's White House Can Ignore the Law
posted by
Wally
10:45 AM
Disregard subpoenas, Justice Dept. says
In a broadly worded legal opinion, the Justice Department has concluded that President Bush's former top lawyer, and possibly other senior White House officials, can ignore subpoenas from Congress to testify about the firings of U.S. attorneys.
The three-page opinion raises questions about whether the Justice Department would prosecute senior administration officials if Congress voted to hold them in contempt for not cooperating with the investigation into the firing last year of eight top prosecutors.
The opinion was prepared this week by the department's Office of Legal Counsel, in response to questions from former White House Counsel Harriet E. Miers, who was subpoenaed to testify today before the House Judiciary Committee. Miers told the panel in a letter faxed Tuesday night that she would not appear, citing the Justice memo and advice from the White House. If Congress allows this to stand, they have become a meaningless facade of a branch of government. If the Justice Department refuses to enforce the law, then law enforcement in this country has just become irrelevant, the President has just become the King, and is above the law and untouchable. If he can tell his people to completely ignore Congress, then Congress has just become irrelevant. The Republic has taken one giant step towards becoming a dictatorship."The privilege does not entitle you to refuse to appear. The privilege entitles you to refuse to answer questions when you appear if those questions call for privileged information," said Stephen Gillers, a legal ethics professor at New York University law school. "No one can claim the privilege entitles you to ignore the body that subpoenas you." Miers did, in fact, refuse to show up for the hearing this morning. Now it's up to Congress. If they don't have the spine to do something about this, it's time for every last one of them to pack up, go home and get real jobs, because they're sure not earning the salary we're paying them.
Contempt Of Congress
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Is it time to raise the terror alert to "Everybody Panic" yet?
posted by
Wally
10:01 AM
On the heels of the following two tidbits, and in light of Bush's and the GOP's plummetting approval ratings, how long can it be until the terror alert goes to Elmo, or at least to Ernie?
U.S. Intel Warns al-Qaeda Rebuilt
U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded al-Qaeda has rebuilt its operating capability to a level not seen since just before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, The Associated Press has learned.
Al-Qaeda is "considerably operationally stronger than a year ago" and has "regrouped to an extent not seen since 2001," the official said, paraphrasing the report's conclusions. "They are showing greater and greater ability to plan attacks in Europe and the United States."
The group also has created "the most robust training program since 2001, with an interest in using European operatives," the official quoted the report as saying. Be Afraid 
Chertoff has "gut feeling" about increased risk of attack
Fearing complacency among the American people over possible terror threats, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said in Chicago Tuesday that the nation faces a heightened chance of an attack this summer.
"I believe we are entering a period this summer of increased risk," Chertoff told the Chicago Tribune's editorial board in an unusually blunt and frank assessment of America's terror threat level. Be very afraid Perhaps the reason for the "complacency" is because of all the times that the Bush administration has cried wolf about imminent terrorist threats and impending doom every time the poll numbers take a dive. Maybe it's not "complacency", but the realization that everyone associated with the Bush administration is suffering from "pants on fire" syndrome.
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
GOP Senators "support the troops" by refusing to give them a break
posted by
Wally
9:13 AM
Senators rejected a proposal Wednesday by Democratic Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia and Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, both Vietnam veterans, that would have guaranteed troops equal time posted in the United States as they spend deployed in war zones overseas.
The amendment was defeated when it failed in a procedural cloture vote 56-41 to reach the de facto 60 threshold votes required for most legislation in the bitterly divided Senate.
"Who is bearing the burden of this war?" asked Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid at a news conference this morning with veterans groups. "It's not the administration. It's certainly not Congress. It's certainly not the Iraqi government. It's our troops, being deployed again and again and again."
"You would have a situation where 535 people thinking about their next election would be telling the commander in chief, 'No, don't go.' What would have happened in Bosnia if the Republican Congress had been able to dictate what President Clinton did," said Sen. Lindsey Graham(R-SC).
LINK Hey Lindsey, pop quiz time: how many U.S. troops were killed in Bosnia? How long did that war last after our troops moved in? How much did that war cost? Answers: "U.S. forces have sustained only one hostile fatality, a soldier who picked up an unexploded munition." LINK (pdf)
"The bombing between August 30 and September 14, 1995, induced the Serbs to negotiate an end to the war in Bosnia, In December 1995 a settlement was signed at Dayton Ohio." So nearly 4 months. "From FY1992 through FY2003, approximately $13.92 billion has been appropriated for Bosnia-related operations." LINK (pdf) We spend almost that much every month in Iraq.
Let's see what these Republicans who are and were so eager for war in Iraq were saying back then, about going into Bosnia to stop the ongoing genocide: "Explain to the mothers and fathers of American servicemen that may come home in body bags why their son or daughter have to give up their life?" ~ Sean Hannity, Fox News
"The President...is once again releasing American military might on a foreign country with an ill-defined objective and no exit strategy. He has yet to tell the Congress how much this operation will cost. And he has not informed our nation's armed forces about how long they will be away from home. These strikes do not make for a sound foreign policy." ~ Sen Rick Santorum (R-PA)
"I cannot support a failed foreign policy. History teaches us that it is often easier to make war than peace. This administration is just learning that lesson right now. The President began this mission with very vague objectives and lots of unanswered questions. A month later, these questions are still unanswered. There are no clarified rules of engagement. There is no timetable. There is no legitimate definition of victory. There is no contingency plan for mission creep. There is no clear funding program. There is no agenda to bolster our over-extended military. There is no explanation defining what vital national interests are at stake. There was no strategic plan for war when the President started this thing, and there still is no plan today" ~ Rep Tom Delay (R-TX)
"Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." ~ Governor George W Bush (R-TX) So fuck you Lindsey Graham, and all you sonsabitches who slap yellow ribbons on your SUV's claiming to support the troops, while giving them the big shaft when it comes to actually "supporting" them. Thank you to all the Democrats who voted to give our troops a break, and to the seven Republicans who joined them.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Rudy's 9/11 Failures of Leadership Exposed by Fire Fighters
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
9:07 AM
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Family Values Party-Time
posted by
Wally
6:26 AM
Republican FL State Rep Arrested For Soliciting Sex In Men's Room
State Rep. Bob Allen (R-Merritt Island) was arrested Wednesday afternoon at a local park after offering to perform a sex act on an undercover officer in exchange for $20, police said.
Titusville police were at Veteran's Memorial Park on East Broad Street on a burglary detail when they noticed an unshaven man acting suspicious, going in and out of the restroom three times, said Lt. Todd Hutchinson.
An undercover officer decided to go into one of the bathroom stalls, Hutchinson said. Moments later, Allen knocked on the stall door and offered to perform oral sex on the officer for $20, according to the police spokesman. Just like a Republican - cheating on his wife. With a dude. Being so cheap that he's only offering $20 bucks. And so stupid that he's "giving" 20 bucks to "give" a blowjob. Tell me again how the GOP is the "party of morals".
but... but... but... Clinton...

Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Wednesday, July 11, 2007
|
U.S. rep to Int'l Boundary Commission fired by Bush for protecting border security
posted by
Wally
8:42 AM
In a bizarre twist to a dispute over a four-foot-high fence near the U.S.-Canada border in Whatcom County, President Bush on Tuesday fired Dennis Schornack as U.S. Commissioner to the International Boundary Commission and member of the International Joint Commission. What the IBC and IJC do, essentially, is maintain the 5,000 mile border between the U.S. and Canada. In the 1925 Treaty of Washington between the U.S. and Canada, they were directed to maintain a 10 foot wide "clear boundary vista" between the two countries. Arguing that Bush overstepped his authority, the legal council to the IBC stated that council members like Schornack hold a "quasi-judicial position with an international body"."First of all, he can't fire him: He can appoint him but he can't fire him," said Elliot Feldman, the IBC's legal counsel.
But Schornack appears to have run afoul of a powerful right-wing legal group with deep, longstanding ties to the Republican Party. The firing came about when an American couple built a wall that intrudes into the 10 foot wide, 100 year old "clear boundary vista" area, and Schornack told them to take it down. The right-wingers cried foul, saying this poor couple was having thier rights violated (don't even get me started on the hypocracy of these bastards whining about rights violations) by not being able to build their little wall and violate a long-standing treaty with the only country that still (hopefully) likes us. Hell, the IBC even offered to pay to bring the wall into compliance.In its defense, the IBC said in a statement: "Sooner rather than later, the Administration will be seen to prefer private property rights over national security and ready to undo an international treaty with Canada to serve that preference." In short, Bush fired a guy he has no authority to fire because he was defending national security and upholding the law.
Is this phase one of Bush's plan to invade Canada?
Blame Canada
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Louisiana GOP committee member: "We're the party of hypocrites"
posted by
Wally
8:05 AM
"Vote for us and we'll lie to you, we'll engage prostitutes and we'll cheat on our wives."
In the wake of U.S. Sen. David Vitter's apology after his phone number turned up in an escort service's call list, (Vincent Bruno) a member of the Republican State Central Committee called for him to resign.
Bruno said Vitter's actions violate the Republican Party's "Family Values" stance but he doesn't expect the party leadership to do anything about it. "We had David Duke and couldn't do anything about it."
"They think more of the party than the right thing to do," he said. "If they're not going to enforce family values, they ought to take it out of the vocabulary." How novel and refreshing. Of course, that's just one lonely Republican in a swarm of apologists for Vitter's behavior.But several Republican colleagues rallied to Vitter's side in Washington. "It's really an issue between he and his family and God, and that has been dealt with, thankfully," said Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C. "He's a very good friend. He's a great legislator. So certainly I accept his apology, and hopefully it won't have any effect on his service here." Funny, but I don't recall anyone accepting apologies from Clinton or rallying to his side when he was caught cheating. The big differenc is that Clinton didn't break any laws when he got his blowjob. Last time I checked, hiring hookers was illegal in D.C., which makes Vitter not only a cheater and a hypocrite, but also a felon. Welcome to the party, Vitter.
Republican Values
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Back to Africa
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:59 AM
I wonder why Bush picked him? Maybe there's a certain "qualification" I'm missing here:
Bush picks black general to lead Africa operations
U.S. President George W. Bush on Tuesday nominated Army Gen. William Ward, the highest ranking black in the U.S. military, to lead the new Africa Command and coordinate military operations on the continent.
Bush's decision in February to create Africa Command came after months of discussion inside the Pentagon and reflected increasing U.S. strategic interest in the continent and worry that Islamic militants were finding safe haven there.
Ward, who must be confirmed by the Senate, is only the fifth black man to attain a fourth star, making him a full general.
"I am honored by President Bush's and (Defense) Secretary (Robert) Gates' confidence and look forward to the confirmation process," Ward said in a prepared statement.
Profilin'
 And I certainly can't end a post without this Bush quote from 2002:
"Do you have blacks, too?" ~Bush, speaking to President Fernando Henrique Cardoso of Brazil
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Ex-aides to cover Bush's ass - claim executive priviledge in Senate hearings
posted by
Wally
6:21 AM
Sara Taylor, former political director, and former White House council Harriet "George Bush is the smartest man I've ever met" Miers have stated that they'll take their chances with the newly stacked courts, and that they are more afraid of pissing off the Bush White House than the sackless Democratic led Congress. Taylor said she will respect Bush's claims of executive privilege and won't answer any questions that would violate that privilege during Senate testimony.Former White House aide Sara M. Taylor will refuse to testify today about matters President Bush has deemed shielded by executive privilege, but she will offer to respond to other questions from senators that do not breach White House confidentiality, her attorney said yesterday.
"In light of the president's direction, I will answer faithfully those questions that are appropriate for a private citizen to answer while also doing my best to respect the president's directive that his staff's communications be privileged." According to the way Bush views it, that leaves her with "name, rank, and serial number". Could be an interesting day on CSPAN today.
No Comment
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:11 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of "brain surgeon" Bush. 
Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
|
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
|
Thou shall only speak what thou is told!
posted by
Clyde
1:07 PM
Former Bush surgeon general says he was muzzled
The first U.S. surgeon general appointed by President George W. Bush accused the administration on Tuesday of political interference and muzzling him on key issues like embryonic stem cell research.
"Anything that doesn't fit into the political appointees' ideological, theological or political agenda is ignored, marginalized or simply buried," Dr. Richard Carmona, who served as the nation's top doctor from 2002 until 2006, told a House of Representatives committee.
"The problem with this approach is that in public health, as in a democracy, there is nothing worse than ignoring science, or marginalizing the voice of science for reasons driven by changing political winds. The job of surgeon general is to be the doctor of the nation, not the doctor of a political party," Carmona added.
Carmona said Bush administration political appointees censored his speeches and kept him from talking out publicly about certain issues, including the science on embryonic stem cell research, contraceptives and his misgivings about the administration's embrace of "abstinence-only" sex education.
(stay away from small aircraft)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Darth @ 13%
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
10:46 AM
When it gets this low, should they really call it an "approval rating?"
Polls: Cheney Nears Quayle as Least Popular Veep
The highest rating for Mr. Cheney was 56 percent in August 2002. Mr. Cheney's favorability among Americans has also suffered - it fell to 13 percent in May, from a high of 43 percent in October 2000. Update: Was Cheney on the DC Madamm's list while CEO of Halliburton?

Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
Sleep well Senator...
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:15 AM
US Senator David Vitter (R-LA) issues statement on DC Madam case
U.S. Sen. David Vitter made the following statement today about his telephone number being on the old phone records of Pamela Martin and Associates prior to his running for the U.S. Senate. He respectfully requests that the statement be used in full without editing or paraphrasing.
"This was a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible. Several years ago, I asked for and received forgiveness from God and my wife in confession and marriage counseling. Out of respect for my family, I will keep my discussion of the matter there-with God and them. But I certainly offer my deep and sincere apologies to all I have disappointed and let down in any way," Vitter said.
But Clinton! And this little gem:
His wife, Wendy, was asked by the Newhouse News reporter: If her husband was as unfaithful as former President Bill Clinton, would she be as forgiving as Hillary Clinton?
"I'm a lot more like Lorena Bobbitt than Hillary," Wendy Vitter told Newhouse News. "If he does something like that, I'm walking away with one thing, and it's not alimony, trust me."
"I think fear is a very good motivating factor in a marriage," she added. "Don't put fear down."

Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Michael Moore slaps down CNN
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:00 AM
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
What's it going to take to get rid of this guy? Gonzo caught lying about Patriot Act abuse.
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
6:30 AM
As he sought to renew the USA Patriot Act two years ago, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales assured lawmakers that the FBI had not abused its potent new terrorism-fighting powers. "There has not been one verified case of civil liberties abuse," Gonzales told senators on April 27, 2005.
Six days earlier, the FBI sent Gonzales a copy of a report that said its agents had obtained personal information that they were not entitled to have. It was one of at least half a dozen reports of legal or procedural violations that Gonzales received in the three months before he made his statement to the Senate intelligence committee, according to internal FBI documents released under the Freedom of Information Act. Technically, Gonzo was correct - there was not one verified case, there were many.The reports also alerted Gonzales in 2005 to problems with the FBI's use of an anti-terrorism tool known as a national security letter (NSL), well before the Justice Department's inspector general brought widespread abuse of the letters in 2004 and 2005 to light in a stinging report this past March.
Each of the violations cited in the reports copied to Gonzales was serious enough to require notification of the President's Intelligence Oversight Board, which helps police the government's surveillance activities. The format of each memo was similar, and none minced words. So Gonzo either couldn't recall any of "at least a half dozen" reports about serious abuses in the 3 months before he testified, or he lied about them. Either he's a corrupt perjurer, or he's incompetent. There is no third option (except for "all of the above"). Not only that, but since these reports were also sent to the President's Intelligence Oversight Board, the same can be said about Bush.
What will Congress do about it? From what we've seen so far, maybe a harshly worded letter or two. That'll show 'em.
Don't impeach them, arrest them
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Monday, July 9, 2007
|
"Progress"
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:00 PM
Here's to you Bush, McCain, Lieberman, etc:
U.S. Military Losses Hit 4,000 in Iraq, Afghanistan
Four thousand U.S. service members have died in U.S. President George W. Bush's "war on terror" in Iraq and Afghanistan 5 1/2 years after American forces ousted the Taliban in December 2001.
A total of 3,596 have died in Iraq since the March 2003 invasion that removed Saddam Hussein from power. Some 2,957 of that number were killed in action, according to the latest Department of Defense figures. More than 26,500 personnel have been wounded in that conflict, 11,959 of them so seriously they couldn't return to duty.
In Afghanistan, 404 American personnel have died, of which 224 were killed in action. Those deaths include 61 personnel who died in Pakistan and Uzbekistan in support of the operation. Some 1,361 have been injured; 813 of them couldn't return to duty.
In Iraq, an insurgency rages against U.S. and coalition forces. The first six months this year were the deadliest yet for the American military, with more than 580 killed.
Hague
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
Bush stamps his feet, holds his breath, and refuses to comply with Congressional subpeonas
posted by
Wally
9:42 AM
The petulant spoiled brat in the White House doesn't like having to follow rules or obey laws or be told what to do. He just wants to keep playing president forever, without actually having to be accountable or responsible for what he does and says. So when Congress issued subpoenas for Harriet Miers and Sara Taylor to testify, as expected, Bush threw a tantrum and essentially told Congress to go f**k themselves.President Bush invoked executive privilege Monday to deny requests by Congress for testimony from two former aides about the firings of federal prosecutors.
The White House, however, did offer again to make former counsel Harriet Miers and one-time political director Sara Taylor available for private, off-the-record interviews. So what he's saying is that Miers and Taylor can't testify due to "executive priviledge", but they CAN be interviewed off the record to talk about the exact same subject matter. Doesn't that offer for an interview nullify the "executive priviledge" claim?
We can't be the only people who see that blatant contradiction. In fact, we suspect that Rep John Conyers (D-MI) among others is also taking note. He's looking at "contempt of Congress" charges against the White House - which would likely land in the courts. Unfortunately, the newly appointed right-wing hacks that bush installed would almost certainly overturn the precedent set when they shot down Clinton's "executive priviledge" claim, and let King George off the hook.
Until Congress puts impeachment back on the table (which I suspect Conyers is about to do), they will have no leverage for negotiations. Until they at least start to consider the possibility of impeachment, Bush will be able to continue to act like a defiant 13 year old, and get away with it. The republicans impeached Clinton for staining a dress. No amount of dry-cleaning can erase the stains that Bush continues to leave on the country and the world.
Call your congressmen and let them know you are not willing to sit idly and watch the president defy the will of congress and the will of the nation. Insist that they hold them accountable. You can find contact information for your congress-critters on the left side of this page under the "Take Action" banner.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
"Startling Progress": Not a single one of 18 goals expected to be achieved in Iraq
posted by
Wally
7:07 AM
More evidence of how "swimmingly" things are going in Iraq, and how well the "surge" is working - according to this article in the Boston Globe.The Iraqi government is unlikely to meet any of the political and security goals President Bush set for it in January when he announced a major shift in US policy, according to senior administration officials closely involved in the matter. That's 0 for 18. So what is Bush doing about it? Trying to move the goalposts again.As US combat deaths have escalated, violence has spread far beyond Baghdad, and sectarian political divides have deepened, the administration must persuade lawmakers to use more flexible, less ambitious standards. Just like when they were selling the war, changing the rationale for invading from "imminent threat" to "wmd's" to "Saddam is arming al Qaeda" to "liberating the Iraqi people" to.... with nothing going as planned, they'll just try to change the plan and hope nobody notices. With the Dems in charge of Congress now, the question isn't whether they'll notice - they will - but will they find the sack to do anything about it, or just cave in with their tails between their legs as soon as mean old Georgie furrows his brow at them?
If Congress or the media or the public need more ammo for pulling out, or for convincing themselves that this has become, unquestionably, a civil war, there is this little bit of news from Iraq.Prominent Shiite and Sunni Muslim politicians called on Iraqi civilians to take up arms to defend themselves after a weekend of violence that claimed more than 220 lives. You read that right, both Sunnis and Shiites are being encouraged to arm themselves.The idea of organizing local communities for their own defense has caught on here in recent months following the success of Sunni Arab tribes in Anbar province that took up arms to help drive al-Qaida from their towns and villages. The United States has effectively driven Iraq back into an era of tribalism.
But there is some promising news - if you can call anything happening in Iraq promising. Now that we have effectively blown an entire nation back into the stone ages (except with guns), the White House is pondering a grand "flip-flop" on the war.Debate is growing in the White House on whether President George W. Bush should announce a pullout of U.S. troops from parts of Iraq, The New York Times said.
The debate is driven in part by fear that Bush's Iraq strategy is losing what support remains among Senate Republicans, the Times said, citing administration officials.
The debate concerns whether Bush should try to prevent further defections in Congress by announcing his intention to begin a gradual withdrawal of troops from parts of Baghdad and other cities, the newspaper reported. Of course, if it happens, the 26% bush-leaguers and the cowering lap-dog news media will call Bush a big hero for ending the war. The war that he started.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:36 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of dubya talking to National Guard families.

Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
|
Sunday, July 8, 2007
|
This week in Freeperville
posted by
Clyde
6:37 AM
Annoying anecdotes from the acidic
Praying for PresiDunce Bush Thank You, Father, for the ability to "agree as touching" and know that You cause these things to come to pass. We honor You this day in Jesus' name. Amen. (Link)
I don't know what this is supposed to mean but the "agree as touching" part is a bit creepy!
Bush and Pooty-Poo I'm sure that Bush's apparent 'man crush' on Putin is merely strategery. Bush is playing Putin like a bull fiddle, and soon will have Russia as a firm ally to the USA. (Link)
Obviously a "shaken baby" survivor!
Olberman's Special Comment I'm laughing at when Olbermann spewed that Bush ceased to be president when he "pardoned" (sic) Libby. Who else but the president can pardon (or grant clemency)? (Link)
And you ain't got no legs Lt. Dan!
Tony Snowjob Tony Snow is an arrogant, condescending blowhard, paid to shill for an arrogant, condescending blowhard. (Link)
You are banished - Intelligence will not be tolerated at Free Republic!
Impeachment We xenophobic, bigoted, racist chickens-who don't want what's best for the country-might be on the sidelines chewing Redman, spitting in empty Betty Crocker vanilla frosting cups, and cheering on the visiting team. (Link)
An apt description if I have ever heard one!
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
He just doesn't spend that much time on him
posted by
Clyde
5:50 AM
U.S. Aborted Raid on Qaeda Chiefs in Pakistan in '05
A secret military operation in early 2005 to capture senior members of Al Qaeda in Pakistan's tribal areas was aborted at the last minute after top Bush administration officials decided it was too risky and could jeopardize relations with Pakistan, according to intelligence and military officials.
The target was a meeting of Qaeda leaders that intelligence officials thought included Ayman al-Zawahri, Osama bin Laden's top deputy and the man believed to run the terrorist group's operations.
But the mission was called off after Donald H. Rumsfeld, then the defense secretary, rejected an 11th-hour appeal by Porter J. Goss, then the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, officials said. Members of a Navy Seals unit in parachute gear had already boarded C-130 cargo planes in Afghanistan when the mission was canceled, said a former senior intelligence official involved in the planning.
Mr. Rumsfeld decided that the operation, which had ballooned from a small number of military personnel and C.I.A. operatives to several hundred, was cumbersome and put too many American lives at risk, the current and former officials said. He was also concerned that it could cause a rift with Pakistan, an often reluctant ally that has barred the American military from operating in its tribal areas, the officials said.
(Link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Pot calling kettle
posted by
Clyde
5:43 AM
Bush Rips Democratic Lawmakers' Failures
President Bush accused Democratic lawmakers on Saturday of being unable to live up to their duties, citing Congress' inability to pass legislation to fund the federal government.
"Democrats are failing in their responsibility to make tough decisions and spend the people's money wisely," Bush said in his weekly radio address. "This moment is a test."
The White House has said the failure of a broad immigration overhaul was proof that Democratic-controlled Capitol Hill cannot take on major issues. "We saw this with immigration, and we're seeing it with some other issues where Congress is having an inability to take on major challenges," said spokesman Tony Fratto.
The main reason the immigration measure died, however, was staunch opposition from Bush's own base - conservatives. The president could not turn around members of his own party despite weeks of intense effort.
(Link)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Saturday, July 7, 2007
|
Can you say double jeopardy
posted by
Clyde
7:40 AM
Judge: Army can try Watada again
Trying 1st Lt. Ehren Watada again for his refusal to deploy to Iraq won't violate his constitutional right not to be prosecuted twice for the same crime, an Army judge ruled Friday.
Watada's new lawyers, Kenneth Kagan and James Lobsenz, immediately filed notice they will appeal that double jeopardy ruling to the Army Court of Criminal Appeals in Arlington, Va.
Watada is charged with missing his unit's deployment in June 2006 and with conduct unbecoming an officer for comments he made about President Bush and the Iraq war. If convicted, he could be sentenced to six years in prison and be dishonorably discharged.
The lieutenant contends the war is illegal and that he would be party to war crimes if he participated. His first trial ended in a mistrial.
(Link)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Winning Hearts and Minds?
posted by
Clyde
7:14 AM
Errant Afghan civilian deaths surge U.S. and NATO troops killed more noncombatants in the last six months than did Taliban insurgents, several tallies indicate.
After more than five years of increasingly intense warfare, the conflict in Afghanistan reached a grim milestone in the first half of this year: U.S. troops and their NATO allies killed more civilians than insurgents did, according to several independent tallies.
The upsurge in deaths at the hands of Western forces has been driven by Taliban tactics as well as by actions of the American military and its allies.
But the growing toll is causing widespread disillusionment among the Afghan people, eroding support for the government of President Hamid Karzai and exacerbating political rifts among NATO allies about the nature and goals of the mission in Afghanistan.
(Link)
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Friday, July 6, 2007
|
Friday humor!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
3:44 PM
This made me laugh. Credit to whoever did this...

Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Nancy....please put IT back on the table!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
12:59 PM
POLL: ARG Pardon/Impeachment
Scooter:
31% of approve of "President George W. Bush commuting the 30-month prison sentence of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby while leaving intact Mr. Libby's conviction for perjury and obstruction of justice in the CIA leak case;" 64% disapprove
11% favor a complete presidential pardon for Libby; 84% oppose Impeachment:
45% favor the idea of the House of Representatives beginning impeachment proceedings against President Bush...while 46% oppose.
54% favor the idea of the House of Representatives beginning impeachment proceedings against Vice-President Cheney...while only 40% oppose.
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
It's hard work!
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
11:00 AM
I hope Chimpy doesn't forget to read his PDB's like the summer of 2001. Remember that? He took a month-long vacation and then whammo, we get attacked. It must be nice to have so much vacation as president:
Camp David is supreme getaway

When summer sunlight hits, the museum-like White House can seem more confining than ever.
So with temperatures high, President Bush is continuing a routine that has become a notable feature of his presidency: the weekend getaway to Camp David.
Today, Bush is departing for his 124th visit as president to the secluded compound in the Catoctin Mountains. Since his inauguration, he has spent all or part of 386 days at Camp David, according to records kept by Mark Knoller of CBS News in Washington, considered an authoritative source on such statistics. Only President Ronald Reagan spent more days there.
.....
But Camp David is not quite the top getaway destination for Bush. That would be his ranch in Crawford, Texas, where he has spent all or part of 416 days since the start of his presidency, according to the White House - roughly a month more than at Camp David.
Now watch this drive!
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
Where do they come up with this sh*t?
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
8:38 AM
Fox News: Universal health care breeds terrorists.
Today on Fox News's Your World With Neil Cavuto, National Review Online columnist Jerry Bowyer attacked Michael Moore's movie SiCKO and its positive portrayal of the health care in countries such as Britain and France. He argued that national health care systems are breeding grounds for terrorists because they are "bureaucratic." "I think the terrorists have shown over and over again...they're very good at gaming the system with bureaucracies," said Bowyer.
 Bowyer also claimed that in the United States, "if one of your doctors is spending all the time online reading Osama bin Laden fatwas, someone's going to notice that."
Co-pay!
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
President Chucklenuts turns 61 today
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:47 AM

Happy Birthday to you. You belong in a zoo. You look like a monkey... and you think like one too!
Permalink
::
4 comments
::
|
|
|
Thursday, July 5, 2007
|
Halliburton stock comes in handy
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
1:12 PM
Libby pays $250,000 fine

WASHINGTON - Convicted former top White House aide I Lewis "Scooter" Libby has paid his fine of $250,400.
The U.S. District Court posted the canceled check on the docket this afternoon.
In commuting Libby's sentence, President Bush said that the former vice presidential aide had suffered enough and that the 30-month prison term ordered up by a federal judge was "excessive."
And the White House still wanted Libby to pay a fine of $250,000.00, and a $400 special assessment. But now there is a question on whether he will have to serve two years of supervised probation imposed by the trial judge.
Slap on the wrist
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Friends in high places
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
9:16 AM
Bush lobbied court to uphold 30-month sentence for perjury, obstruction. In 2006. For a sick Marine. With 25 years of service. And 35 medals....
Sen. Joe Biden:
Tony Snow said that President Bush decided to commute Scooter Libby's two and a half year-prison sentence for perjury and obstruction of justice, because it was "excessive."
Yet last year the Bush Administration filed a "friend-of-the-court brief" with the Supreme Court, in an attempt to uphold a lower court's ruling that a 33-month prison sentence for Victor Rita, who was convicted of the same exact charges, perjury and obstruction of justice, was "reasonable." Pres. Bush cited Libby's "years of exceptional public service" in commuting his prison sentence. But Libby is the classic Bushie chickenhawk - a neocon bureaucrat with no service record whose fingerprints are all over the worst military planning in American history.
Conversely, Victor Rita is the real deal:
Victor Rita is a very sympathetic defendant: he served 24 years in the Marine Corps, had tours of duty in Vietnam and the first Gulf war, and has received over 35 military metals and awards. Also, he is an elderly gentleman who suffers serious health problems. Asshole
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Bush is finally right about something. Iraq is just like the Revolutionary War.
posted by
Wally
7:54 AM
When Bush compared the situation in Iraq to the Revolutionary war in his Independence Day speech in W.VA yesterday, it was the most accurate statement he's made in a long time. The only problem is, he doesn't understand why it's accurate. President Bush on Wednesday equated the war in Iraq with the U.S. war for independence. Like those revolutionaries who "dropped their pitchforks and picked up their muskets to fight for liberty," Bush said that American soldiers were also fighting "a new and unprecedented war" to protect U.S. freedom. Yup, Iraq is just like the Revolutionary war, when a ragtag group of farmers, ranchers, and regular citizens of all ages picked up whatever arms they could muster, and at great risk to themselves and their families, fought against the military occupation of the most powerful nation in the world. In an incredible show of resistance, they defended their homes and their land, and defeated the mightiest military of the day. The comparison is even more fitting when you remember that the American revolutionaries were fighting a nation who's leader was named King George.
Once again, Bush finds himself on the wrong side of his own example.
Revolution
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
They better start listening to us...
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:38 AM
Or this won't mean a damn thing:
A Stark Edge in Race for '08 Cash New Numbers Heavily Favor The Democrats
Campaign contributors to the 2008 presidential candidates heavily favored Democrats in the three-month period that ended Saturday, giving three dollars to the party's leading contenders for every two dollars they gave to the top Republican candidates.
Democratic Sen. Barack Obama's 258,000 contributors since January exceed the combined number of donors of former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney and Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), according to estimates provided by the campaigns.
Romney announced yesterday that he has lent his campaign $6.5 million from his personal fortune to supplement the $14 million he raised from April through June. Giuliani's campaign said it raised about $15 million during the quarter. Last week, McCain announced a dramatic staff shake-up after raising only $11 million, leaving him with just $2 million in the bank.
.....
Political observers said the Democratic enthusiasm is being fueled by anger over the Iraq war, while dissatisfaction among conservative Republicans with their choices has dampened the mood of traditional GOP givers.
2008
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
|
Wednesday, July 4, 2007
|
Olbermann Special Comment to Bush: Resign!
posted by
Wally
6:55 AM
Please stay out of small planes Keith.
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Happy 4th of July everyone
posted by
Clyde
5:01 AM
 IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776 The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. - That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, - That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. - Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
Rest of the text
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
It's not over yet
posted by
Clyde
4:56 AM
Technicality may wipe out Libby's probation
President Bush forced the CIA leak case into uncharted legal territory when he commuted the prison sentence of former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, a federal judge said Tuesday.
Bush eliminated Libby's 2 1/2-year prison term and left in place his two years of supervised release. But supervised release - a form of probation - is only available to people who have served prison time. Without prison, it's unclear what happens next.
U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton posed the question to Libby's attorneys and to Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald: Does this mean Libby won't actually be required to serve supervised release? Should he just have to report to probation officials as if he spent time in prison?
(Link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Tuesday, July 3, 2007
|
Just like his 3 vetos...
posted by
Dookie The Webmaster
7:46 AM
Bush goes against the majority of the nation:
CNN poll:
Was President Bush right to commute Lewis "Scooter" Libby's prison sentence?
Yes 20% No 80%
Total Votes: 51030 MSNBC poll:
Do you agree with President Bush's decision to commute former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby's prison sentence?
Yes 28% No 72%
207866 responses Wall Street Journal poll:
Do you agree with President Bush's decision to spare "Scooter" Libby prison time?
Yes 28% No 72%
Total Votes : 12878 Funny how the "yes" votes mirror Bush's approval rating..

Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Bush Let's Scooter Walk
posted by
Wally
6:22 AM
He pardoned Libby for purjury and obstruction of justice. Will he now also pardon Clinton for the same crimes?
President Bush let Scooter off the hook yesterday, just 5 hours after Libby lost his appeal to stay out of prison during his appeal process. He said that even though a jury of his peers found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, his 2 1/2 year stint in country club federal pen was too harsh for a loyal friend of Bush (especially one who had fell on his sword to protect the president and his administration)."Others point out that a jury of citizens weighed all the evidence and listened to all the testimony and found Mr. Libby guilty of perjury and obstructing justice. They argue, correctly, that our entire system of justice relies on people telling the truth. And if a person does not tell the truth, particularly if he serves in government and holds the public trust, he must be held accountable." Must be held accountable, that is, unless he's part of the Bush cabal."I respect the jury's verdict," Bush said lied in a statement. "But I have concluded that the prison sentence given to Mr. Libby is excessive. Therefore, I am commuting the portion of Mr. Libby's sentence that required him to spend thirty months in prison."
Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald disputed the president's assertion that the prison term was excessive. Libby was sentenced under the same laws as other criminals, Fitzgerald said. "It is fundamental to the rule of law that all citizens stand before the bar of justice as equals," the prosecutor said.
"Libby's conviction was the one faint glimmer of accountability for White House efforts to manipulate intelligence and silence critics of the Iraq war," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. "Now, even that small bit of justice has been undone." House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was more to the point, saying that the pardon proves that Bush "condones criminal conduct." More accurately Nancy, he condones criminal conduct only among his own close-knit gang, who are above the law. As far as Bush is concerned, everyone else can hang.
Get out of jail free
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
Monday, July 2, 2007
|
Court to Scooter: Go to Jail. Go Directly to Jail.
posted by
Wally
12:27 PM
Former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby cannot delay his 2-year prison term in the CIA leak case, a federal appeals court unanimously ruled Monday.
The decision is a dramatic setback for Libby, who likely will have to surrender to prison in weeks. The ruling puts pressure on President Bush, who has been sidestepping calls by Libby's allies to pardon the former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney. At least they're giving him a few weeks - ample time to stock up on much needed supplies, such as smokes, lube, and soap on a rope.

And for all you 26%'ers out there who are still calling this a partisan hack job: Like Libby's trial judge, two of the three judges who ruled against him Monday were Republican nominees. The question remains, will Bush pardon Scooter and prove how much he condones and encourages corruption and purjury, or will he turn his back on the man who took the dive to protect him and his administration?
Either way he's an asshole, same as he ever was.
PMITA
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
How Sane Governments Deal With Terrorism
posted by
Wally
8:06 AM
After 2 days, the Brits have 7 people in custody. After 7 years, the U.S. has spent a half trillion dollars, got stuck in 2 wars, and still hasn't captured Osama
On Friday, British police defused a pair of car bombs in downtown London. Saturday, a couple of guys drove a Jeep filled with propane into the Glasgow airport and tried to blow it up. Rather than rounding up a massive military force and invading a couple of random countries that the British government didn't like, they chose a more reasoned, less dangerous and expensive route. They figured out who was responsible for the criminal acts and started arresting them. The two latest arrests, made on Sunday night in Paisley, took the number detained to seven. Police said the men, aged 25 and 28, were not believed to be of Scottish origin.
A police source said the investigation was going very well and that they expected to make more arrests. The source said the plot bore "all the hallmarks" of al Qaeda and that there had been no warning of the attack on Glasgow airport on Saturday.
"This continues to be a fast-moving investigation," said Assistant Chief Constable John Malcolm of Strathcylde police in Scotland. "I would continue to urge people to be vigilant." Those sissy Brits - arresting criminals as if they were, well, criminals. Here they have the perfect excuse to go play with their army toys and kill a bunch of brown people, and all they do is track down and arrest those responsible for the crime.
The Brits are being big pussies just like Clinton was after the 1993 WTC bombing. Proving how weak on terror Clinton was, the terrorists waited barely a month before attacking us here on our home shores. What did he do to retaliate? Sent in the ATF to "investigate" the scene and identify the perpetrators. All this military might at his disposal, and just like those pansy Brits, he sent in the police.
Within a few years, "ten militant Islamist conspirators were convicted for their part in the bombing, each receiving prison sentences of a maximum of 240 years." Remember the names Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman and Ramzi Yousef? Yeah, me too - just barely. Names relegated to the dustbin of history - all but forgotten while they rot in prison.
Meantime, 3,580 US troops, 100's of 1,000's of Iraqi civilians, half a trillion dollars, and 7 years after 9/11, where the fuck is Osama bin Laden? Oh yeah, he's frikking everywhere. Thanks to the Bush administration, instead of a lonely nobody wasting away in a prison cell somewhere, he's become the greatest hero of our worst enemies. Instead of a fringe whacko scorned by his countrymen as an embarrasment, he's been made into a role model for many thousands or millions of young Muslims who have lived through the horror having their country destroyed and their friends and family killed by U.S. forces. He has gone from lunatic to leader, from extremist to mainstream - the poster child for defiance against the infidel Americans. As his followers grow up, with the horrors of their youth forever burned into memory, how many more Osama's will we have to deal with?
How many generations will it take to recover? How many lives have been and will be lost? How much death and destruction will result from George W. Bush's insane arrogance, and his failure to simply arrest the criminals responsible?
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Another "Bushie" faces potential indictment. Leahy threatens Dubya with "Criminal Contempt of Congress" charge over subpoenas
posted by
Wally
7:05 AM
Yet another Bush administration official is facing possible indictment on criminal charges. This time it's not some mid-level lackey. It's Georgie hisownself. When Congress issues subpoenas last week demanding that the White House turn over Dept of Justice documentation regarding the attorney firing scandal, it wasn't a question of "pretty please could they have them." It was a frikking subpoena. If you or I ignore one of those, we'd be immediately hauled off and locked up. We're not so lucky in the case of the Bush administration, so he's still walking around free as a menace to humanity, but the President is still a citizen of this country, and bound by the same laws as every other citizen - in spite of his 1100 signing statements.
When Bush refused to comply with the subpoenas, he lit a fire under Congress, and now it's game-time.The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee signaled today that he would seek to hold White House officials in contempt of Congress if they do not comply with congressional subpoenas.
"If they don't cooperate, yes, I'll go that far," said Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), when asked on NBC's "Meet the Press" if he would ask Congress to hold President Bush in contempt if he refuses to respond to subpoenas.
"The president and vice president are not above the law anymore than you and I are," Leahy said.
If the White House continues to assert executive privilege, he said, the next step for Congress is to determine whether the claim is legitimate. "Based on the court cases," it is not, he said. If his colleagues agree, the Judiciary Committee and Congress will have to vote on whether to hold Bush in contempt, and if they vote in the affirmative, the case will be relayed to the U.S. attorney for prosecution. Pretty strong words. But can and will they follow through? If they do, what will Bush's newly appointed "activist" judges on the SCOTUS say?
Arrest that man
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
Caption This
posted by
Wally
6:29 AM
Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of dubya working hard at presidentin' and sacrificing for the war effort.

Permalink
::
3 comments
::
|
|
|
Sunday, July 1, 2007
|
Bush's Summer Reading: "Troublesome Young Men" about Churchill. The author says Bush is the anti-Churchill.
posted by
Wally
8:08 AM
George W. Bush always wanted to be like a wartime British prime minister. He is. But it's not the one he had in mind.
George Bush has been reading "Troublesome Young Men" by Lynne Olson. The book is "a history of the small group of Conservative members of Parliament who defied British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's policy of appeasing Adolf Hitler, forced Chamberlain to resign in May 1940 and helped make Churchill his successor." While dubya likes to compare himself to Churchill, the book's author, Ms. Olson, says he's comparing himself to the wrong guy. "The more you understand the historical record, the more the parallels leap out -- but they're between Bush and Chamberlain, not Bush and Churchill."Like Bush and unlike Churchill, Chamberlain came to office with almost no understanding of foreign affairs or experience in dealing with international leaders. Nonetheless, he was convinced that he alone could bring Hitler and Benito Mussolini to heel. He surrounded himself with like-minded advisers and refused to heed anyone who told him otherwise.
In the months leading up to World War II, Chamberlain and his men saw little need to build up a strong coalition of European allies with which to confront Nazi Germany -- ignoring appeals from Churchill and others to fashion a "Grand Alliance" of nations to thwart the threat that Hitler posed to the continent. Can you say "your with us or against us"? Bush did manage to build a "coalition" of such military giants as Eritrea and Micronesia though. Oh, and "don't forget about Poland". Like Bush, Chamberlain also laid claim to unprecedented executive authority, evading the checks and balances that are supposed to constrain the office of prime minister. He scorned dissenting views, both inside and outside government. When Chamberlain arranged his face-to-face meetings with Hitler in 1938 that ended in the catastrophic Munich conference, he did so without consulting his cabinet, which, under the British system, is responsible for making policy. He also bypassed the House of Commons, leading Harold Macmillan, a future Tory prime minister who was then an anti-appeasement MP, to complain that Chamberlain was treating Parliament "like a Reichstag, to meet only to hear the orations and to register the decrees of the government of the day."
As was true of Bush and the Republicans before the 2006 midterm elections, Chamberlain and his Tories had a large majority in the Commons, and, as Macmillan noted, the prime minister tended to treat Parliament like a lapdog legislature, existing only to do his bidding. "I secretly feel he hates the House of Commons," wrote one of Chamberlain's most fervent parliamentary supporters. "Certainly he has a deep contempt for Parliamentary interference." The comparison between Bush and the characters in Lynne Olson's "Churchill" book are certainly apt. The problem is, George isn't smart enough to realize that he's on the wrong side of that comparison.
On a positive note, Great Britain recovered from Chamberlain's vast failings, even though it took the likes of Churchill, and a few decades to do so. That fact gives me hope that the United States can and will recover from the catastrophe that is the Bush administration. Who will be our Churchill?
Bush = Churchill Chamberlain
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
This week in Freeperville
posted by
Clyde
7:35 AM
New noxious nuggets of nonsense
Praying for PresiDunce Bush DO NOT POST HATEFUL COMMENTS ON THIS OR ANY PRAYER THREAD. Failure to comply may result in suspension or banishment. (Link)
Rut Roh not banishment! Anything but that!
Ann-Dee Coulter flap The left can't deal with truth, so they resort to character assassination. Goebbles would be proud of them. (Link)
She started it! Geez
Illegal immigration I'd round up the illegals, their families, dogs, cats, chickens and goats, drug them and plant RFI chips and GPS locators subcutaneously in all of them and deport them in handcuffs and chains or throw them all in prison and make them work to pay back all that they've cost us and taken in jobs. (Link)
You like Big Brother just a little too much don't ya?
Dick Morris and Iraq Okay, Dick's been huffing the OdorEaters again, hasn't he? (Link)
That's just plain funny!
Scooter Libby pardon I say the Judge was a crook, The prosecutor is an agent of the DNC and the liberal Washington DC jury would convict Mother Theresa if they could hurt George Bush by doing it. (Link)
You were abused as a child weren't you?
Permalink
::
1 comments
::
|
|
She deserves better
posted by
Clyde
7:06 AM
For woman HIV, Navy meds, care dwindle
Richelle Starnes' cell phone alarm beeps to interrupt her three times a day. It's her reminder: Take the medication.
Richelle is 26, a red-headed forward on the semi-pro Orlando Falcons soccer team, and the ring is an interruption she's used to, a reminder she has HIV.
Now, however, her supply of pills dwindles at each alarm. She has enough to last into mid-August. After that? That's a question she's wrestling over with the Navy.
It's the Navy that has been treating Richelle since she was 10. That's when she learned she was infected with HIV, an infection she and her family blame on the Navy. But as Richelle has become an adult, the Navy has questioned its responsibility to her. As for the pills she needs, the Navy says it won't pay for them any more.
(Link)
Permalink
::
2 comments
::
|
|
There's hope for the future yet
posted by
Clyde
6:28 AM
Young Americans Are Leaning Left, New Poll Finds
Young Americans are more likely than the general public to favor a government-run universal health care insurance system, an open-door policy on immigration and the legalization of gay marriage, according to a New York Times/CBS News/MTV poll. The poll also found that they are more likely to say the war in Iraq is heading to a successful conclusion.
The poll offers a snapshot of a group whose energy and idealism have always been as alluring to politicians as its scattered focus and shifting interests have been frustrating. It found that substantially more Americans ages 17 to 29 than four years ago are paying attention to the presidential race. But they appeared to be really familiar with only two of the candidates, Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton, both Democrats.
They have continued a long-term drift away from the Republican Party. And although they are just as worried as the general population about the outlook for the country and think their generation is likely to be worse off than that of their parents, they retain a belief that their votes can make a difference, the poll found.
(Link)
Permalink
::
0 comments
::
|
|
|
|
|
Headlines
& Comments |
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Store |
 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Amazon.com |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|