Home

Columnists

Merchandise

Other Stuff

 

 Air America Radio

 Head-On Radio Network

 Search dubyaD40.com

Google


Search Web
Search dubyaD40.com

 Ads by The Google

 Take Action

 Recent Posts

 Archives

 Today's Reason To Drink



 Want to link to us?


It's easy to do.  Right click on the image below and choose "Copy."  Then paste it on your site.


 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 Today's Topics

 
Saturday, June 30, 2007
*** dubyaD40 Exclusive *** O'Reilly invents the news again!
posted by Clyde
7:52 AM

Once again the bloviating blowhard Bill O'Reilly has decided to take it upon himself to invent a news story ala the "War on Christmas."

In his "Back of the Book" segment of the O'Reilly factor on June 21, 2007, the Loofa Lothario was reporting on the increasing danger of "Lesbian Gangs" throughout the United States. At approximately 43 seconds into the segment, O'Reilly shows a film clip of a "supposed" fight between rival gangs of lesbians.



The only problem is that the clip is not a fight between lesbians but of a group of girls at the beach fighting over a guy according to the attribution on the posted clip.



The Falafel King gets it all in this one - he gets to spew "hate speech" by bashing gays while drooling over lesbians, showing sensationalist "catfight" footage, and lying all at the same time.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

"Presidential Advance Manual": Don't let critics near the event. Organize Rally Squads to drown out demonstrators
posted by Wally
6:47 AM

The ACLU got it's hands on the "Presidential Advance Manual" detailing how to keep the president and the press from ever being exposed to anyone except fawning loyal "Bushies" at public events. More proof that Republicans only believe in free speech when it supports their agenda and ideology.
The ACLU filed today's lawsuit after obtaining a heavily redacted version of the Presidential Advance Manual from the Justice Department. This manual is the Bush administration's guide for planning presidential events around the country, and it repeatedly instructs organizers about "the best method for preventing demonstrators," "deterring potential protestors from attending events," "designat[ing] a protest area . . . preferably not in view of the event site or motorcade route," and the like.

"The White House has gone too far in its attempt to make dissent invisible," said Chris Hansen, a senior ACLU attorney who is lead counsel in this case. "When taxpayers foot the bill for a public event, the president does not have the right to use a partisan litmus test to stack the audience with his political supporters."

"When the president attends a public event, the First Amendment does not allow him to speak or listen only to those who agree with him," said Arthur Spitzer, Legal Director of the ACLU of the National Capital Area and co-counsel in the lawsuit. "Public places cannot be 'cleansed' of all dissent just to make the president look popular on television."




Highlighted parts read:
First, as always, work with the Secret Service and have them ask the local police department to designate a protest area where demonstrators can be placed, preferably not in view of the event site or motorcade route.

The Rally Squad's task is to use their signs and banners as shields between the demonstrators and main press platform. If the demonstrators are yelling, the rally squads can begin and lead supportive chants to drown out the protesters (USA! USA! USA!)
I'm surprised they didn't hand out brown shirts to the "Rally Squads" to complete the picture.

Download the manual HERE
Read the whole article HERE

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, June 29, 2007
It's a man, baby!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:11 PM

Last night on the O'Reilly Factor:

O'REILLY: Right. They called in advance. We're going to do this because we're getting a little - look, it's just like me and Stuart Smalley, Franken, that idiot. I played right into his hands when he had his book out. You know, they want to get in a fight with you.

COULTER: If I could just say, I sort of object to your description of this as if I lost a fight. I don't think they would have done it to anyone else. I don't think they would have called in on…

O'REILLY: Were you surprised that she called in?

COULTER: ...your pal Al. If Al Franken were on, they wouldn't have had the wife of someone he had made a nasty joke about call in. But still I am more of a man than any liberal is. So you know, I don't care.
Transcript


Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

In a move certain to overjoy Muslims, Bush says Israel should be the model for Iraq
posted by Wally
9:48 AM

Every time I think he has achieved the ultimate pinnacle of idiocy, and that he can't possibly say or do something even more stupid and insane, he proves me wrong.
President Bush held up Israel as a model for defining success in Iraq, saying Thursday that the goal of the U.S. mission there is not eliminating attacks but enabling a democracy that can function despite continuing violence.
Aside from the level of ongoing violence in Israel (car bombings, etc) - violence which he is no longer concerned with quelling, apparently - he is holding up as a "model" the most despised nation in the region. Most of the rest of the nations in the middle east have either attempted to (or threatened to) wipe Israel off the map, or wouldn't lift a finger to stop that from happening. He is saying Iraq should become like their sworn enemies. Good plan.
"Our success in Iraq must not be measured by the enemy's ability to get a car bombing in the evening news," he said. "No matter how good the security, terrorists will always be able to explode a bomb on a crowded street."
Funny, but I don't recall a lot of car bombs going off in Baghdad before we invaded Iraq. Likewise, in spite of the lax security in much of the free world, in countries like, say, the U.S. or France or Netherlands, you don't seem to hear about the daily car-bombings happening in those countries.

It appears to me that the expectations are plummetting rapidly. One might almost begin to think that a wee bit of "reality" is beginning to creep into the White House in spite of the best efforts of the administration. Then Bush does something like suggest that Iraq be more like Israel, and there go any thoughts of a "reality-based" presidency.
There (in Israel), Bush said, "Terrorists have taken innocent human life for years in suicide attacks. The difference is that Israel is a functioning democracy and it's not prevented from carrying out its responsibilities. And that's a good indicator of success that we're looking for in Iraq."
By "good indicator of success", I wonder if he's referring to the the half-century of war and suffering, or all the car and bus bombing and mortar attacks, or maybe the 100's of billions of dollars in aid we ship to Israel every year. Come to think of it, that sounds like what's happening in Iraq right now.

Does that mean we've succeeded? Does that mean we can bring our troops home now?

Oy vey! What a quagmire

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Lewis Black on the "librul" media
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
9:42 AM

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

A first?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:06 AM

This has to be a first. In its new poll, Fox News asked what may well be the ultimate in jingoistic, rally-around-the-flag questions - and the Democrats came out on top.

If there is an all-out war between the United States and various radical Muslim groups worldwide, who would you rather have in charge - Democrats or Republicans?

Democrats 41%
Republicans 38%
Both the same
(not listed) 9%
Don't know
(not listed) 12%
TPM

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:40 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya on stage at the U.S. Naval War College

Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, June 28, 2007
In favor of universal healthcare and gays in the military, against "spreading democracy". Crazy liberals? Nope - Republican voters
posted by Wally
2:47 PM

A large nationwide poll of Republican voters shows that an increasing number consider themselves conservative, that about half favor universal healthcare and allowing gays in the military, and that the vast majority say spreading democracy shouldn't be the United States' top foreign policy goal.

Fifty-one percent of the GOPers said universal healthcare coverage should be a right of every American, and 49 percent favored allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military.

Nearly four in five Republicans said that U.S. foreign policy should be based on protecting economic and national security interests, versus 16 percent who preferred basing it on spreading democracy.
All this leads to the obvious question: Why the hell are they voting Republican? Oh yeah. They watch FucksNooze, so have no idea what's actually going on in the world - particularly the world of politics.

Morans

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Scooter Libby, Inmate No. 28301-016
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:02 AM

While the Washington, D.C. Court of Appeals considers I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby's request to remain free on bond pending the appeal of his conviction, the Justice Department has issued him an inmate number.

The United States Marshals assigned inmate number 28301-016 to the Vice President's former chief of staff and national security advisor, who was convicted in March on four felony charges of lying to the FBI, a grand jury and obstructing justice in the CIA Leak investigation.

The Bureau of Prisons will continue the process, and determine where Libby will have to report to prison. Currently a pre-sentence investigation report is being compiled by the probation office at the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.

...

If the D.C. Court of Appeals denies Libby's request to remain free on bond during the appeals process, he might have to report to prison by late July or early August.

Cornholio'd

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Showdown in D.C. - Bush claims exec. priviledge, refuses to answer Congressional subpoenas
posted by Wally
9:35 AM

In the face of Congressional subpoenas, proposed by Dems and supported by members of both parties, the Bush administration (including Dick "not in the executive branch" Cheney) did exactly what one would expect them to do based on historical precedent. Throw a temper tantrum, hold it's breath, and claim that "executive privilege" is a legitimate reason to violate the law.
President Bush, moving toward a constitutional showdown with Congress, asserted executive privilege Thursday and rejected lawmakers' demands for documents that could shed light on the firings of federal prosecutors.

Bush's attorney told Congress the White House would not turn over subpoenaed documents for former presidential counsel Harriet Miers and former political director Sara Taylor.

In reaction, Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy accused the administration of shifting "into Nixonian stonewalling" and revealing "disdain for our system of checks and balances."

"Increasingly, the president and vice president feel they are above the law," said Leahy, D-Vt., after getting the news from Fielding in an early-morning phone call. "In America no one is above law."
The claim of executive privilege and refusal to cooperate were expected and shouldn't surprise to anyone. What will be a surprise is if the Democrats in Congress show the balls to follow through and go after these guys. It will be even more of a surprise if they succeed in the face of the Bush appointed Supreme Court.

Hopefully the Dems realize that the court will almost certainly side with Bush in an "executive privilege" battle, and will act accordingly. Putting impeachment back on the table would give them a nice bit of bargaining leverage. Leaving it off the table renders them just as impotent as we've come to expect.

Call your congress-critters. Demand that they follow through on the subpoenas, and failing that, that they begin impeachment proceedings immediately. Ask your Senators and Representative, what do these guys have to do to be held accountable for their misdeeds? How many laws must they violate before they will be forced to answer for their actions? What will it take?

Clinton got a blowjob


UPDATE: At least some of the Dems are already showing chutzpah.
A statement just out from House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI):

"The President's response to our subpoena shows an appalling disregard for the right of the people to know what is going on in their government. The executive privilege assertion is unprecedented in its breadth and scope, and even includes documents that the Adminstration previously offered to provide as part of their 'take it or leave it' proposal. This response indicates the reckless disrepect this Administration has for the rule of law. The charges alleged in this investigation are serious - including obstruction of justice and misleading Congress - and the White House should be as committed to this investigation as the Congress. At this point, I see only one choice in moving forward, and that is to enforce the rule of law set forth in these subpoenas."

Update: And this just in from Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA), the chairwoman of the subcommittee that's led the House's investigation:

"It's tough to get lectured on the Constitution from the same Administration that said the Vice President is his own branch of government. The fact is that the Bush Administration, which has publicly declared its commitment to getting the truth on this issue, has stonewalled from the beginning. Mr. Fielding should understand two things: that nobody in their right mind would accept a White House offer that would condone perjury, and that saying 'take-it-or-leave-it' for months is not actually negotiation."

This Means War

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Rush?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:46 AM

"Spiderman" robs oxycontin from pharmacy

Police in Fairfax County are searching for a pharmacy robber who disguises himself in a Spiderman mask.

The robber was caught on surveillance cameras Monday afternoon at a Giant grocery store in Burke robbing the pharmacy inside the store.

.....

Wearing baseball batting gloves, a sweatshirt and shorts, police said the masked thief waited for one of the two store pharmacists to leave then crouched behind the counter and ordered another pharmacist to open the vault and hand over oxycontin.

EIB

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

News to make Colbert happy. Evidence that the ESA Works - Bald Eagle taken off Endangered Species List
posted by Wally
7:42 AM

Today we celebrate the successful recovery of the Bald Eagle, as it is officially removed from the rolls endangered species. The "delisting" is both a success story for the bird and for the Endangered Species Act, and a firm kick in the balls for the pro-business anti-environment right wing extremists like Bush and Cheney and the 29% who follow them blindly. The same people who think global warming is a hoax and evolution is "just a theory" have been arguing for decades that the act doesn't work and should be eliminated or weakened in the name of "progress" (pronounced "money"). With the recovery and delisting of our National Symbol, their arguments become harder to justify.
"The rescue of the bald eagle from the brink of extinction ranks among the greatest victories of American conservation," said John Flicker, president of the National Audubon Society.




"Like no other species, the bald eagle showed us all that environmental stewardship has priceless rewards," Flicker said. "In every state, parents and grandparents can still point to the sky and share a moment of wonder as a bald eagle soars overhead."
In the face of success, threats remain. The Bush administration is still working to weaken the ESA or find ways around it. The Roberts' Supreme Court also struck a blow when it ruled earlier this week that states can ignore the ESA when issuing water discharge permits to land developers. These things don't bode well for those species that remain endangered or threatened. Hopefully the Democratic congress will find it's spine and it's conscience, and will move to continue, and to expand these kinds of protections so that these majestic, and some not so majestic creatures are not displaced by shopping malls, Walmarts, and factories. Our grandchildren and their grandchildren deserve it.

Let the eeeaaaagle soaaaar.....

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thanks to Bush's Tax Cuts, the 3rd Richest Man In the World Pays A Lower Income Tax Rate Than You Do
posted by Wally
6:53 AM

While the middle and working classes in America struggle to put food on their families, stretching a stagnant paycheck to meet skyrocketing gas and food prices and exorbitant health care costs and insurance premiums, the Republicans are doing what they can to help out the situation. No, they're not helping out the middle and working classes, they are doing what they can to maintain the situation as it stands. They like having a poor lower class - people to clean their mansions and cook their meals.

Led by Bush and Cheney, the GOP with its tax cut policies is helping the people who don't even know how much gas or food or insurance costs. They are giving money to the people who are so rich that they pay other people to deal with that stuff.
Warren E. Buffett was his usual folksy self Tuesday night at a fundraiser for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) as he slammed a system that allows the very rich to pay taxes at a lower rate than the middle class.

Buffett cited himself, the third-richest person in the world, as an example. Last year, Buffett said, he was taxed at 17.7 percent on his taxable income of more than $46 million. His receptionist was taxed at about 30 percent.

Buffett said that was despite the fact that he was not trying to avoid paying higher taxes. "I don't have a tax shelter," he said. And he challenged Congress and his audience to see what the people who "clean our offices" are taxed, to loud applause.
Meantime, the deficit continues to grow - to the tune of 30,000 for every man, woman, and child in America. But what's 30 grand to a Warren Buffett or a Bill Gates? Especially when he is expected to pay less of it, on a percentage basis, than you are.

Enjoy that $300 rebate

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, June 27, 2007
Go ahead, try to ignore it...
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:10 PM

White House, Cheney's office, subpoenaed

WASHINGTON - The Senate Judiciary Committee subpoenaed the White House and Vice President Dick Cheney's office Wednesday for documents relating to President Bush's warrant-free eavesdropping program.

Also named in subpoenas signed by committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., were the Justice Department and the National Security Council.

The committee wants documents that might shed light on internal squabbles within the administration over the legality of the program, said a congressional official speaking on condition of anonymity because the subpoenas had not been made public.

Leahy's committee authorized the subpoenas previously as part of its sweeping investigation into how much influence the White House exerts over the Justice Department and its chief, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

Crooks

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

A desperate lay
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
9:13 AM

I can't believe someone was so depserate to knock her up. Now we're going to have 2 little "Damien's" running around. I wonder what she'll name them. Natalie & Holloway?

CNN's Nancy Grace Pregnant With Twins

TV's legal eagle, Nancy Grace, has revealed that she is four months pregnant with twins. But that's not her only headliner: she also snuck off and got married!

"I always said I wanted a family," Grace told Access Hollywood. "I grew up in happy, loving family [and] I wanted it too. But until now I just thought it wasn't meant to be for me. And as part of God's mysterious plan, I'm given this wonderful blessing late in life -- and I could not be happier."

47-years-old, and happier than ever! The CNN "Headline News" host married Atlanta-based banker David Linch in April. The couple reportedly met when they attended Mercer College together in the late 1970s.

Shoulda pulled out

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush's Poodle Off The Leash - Blair Retires Today
posted by Wally
6:37 AM

Today's the day when Bush loses his last (and only) ally in the ever dwindling "coalition of the willing". Tony Blair will officially hop off of George's lap, slip out of the collar, and hand power over to Gordon Brown, who, we suspect and hope, will be a little less docile about being on the wrong end of the leash.

But even with Tony walking out on George, the two are parting on amicable terms. Contrary to an ugly divorce, George praised Tony while scratching him behind his big floppy ears, even pushing to make him Middle East special envoy for UN.
Tony Blair was no poodle, President Bush said in a newspaper interview published Wednesday.

"I've heard he's been called Bush's poodle," The Sun quoted Mr. Bush as saying. "He's bigger than that."

Endless Love

"Somehow our relationship has been seen as Bush saying to Blair 'jump' and Blair saying 'how high?' but that's just not the way it works," Mr. Bush said. "It's a relationship where we say were both going to jump together."
It's disturbing to imagine what he might have meant by "jump together", but I'm confident that Tony will continue to behave in his new role so that George doesn't have him put to sleep. Bush will miss you Mr. Blair. As for the rest of us.... Good riddance, and about bloody time.

Bark like a dog Tony

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:34 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya behind Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) at a fundraiser in Mobile.


Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, June 26, 2007
CIA flashes "The Family Jewels"
posted by Wally
2:31 PM

You know all those rumors you heard about the CIA secretly doing all kinds of shady and illegal things all these years? Well, the CIA released a stack of "tell all" documents giving details about all kinds of things they were up to during the 60's and 70's. Those rumors? Turns out that a lot of them were true.
The CIA released hundreds of pages of internal reports Tuesday on assassination plots, secret drug testing and spying on Americans that triggered a scandal in the mid-1970s.

The documents detail assassination plots against foreign leaders such as Fidel Castro, the testing of mind-altering drugs like LSD on unwitting citizens, wiretapping of U.S. journalists, spying on civil rights and anti-Vietnam war protesters, opening of mail between the United States and the Soviet Union and China and break-ins at the homes of ex-CIA employees and others.

The 693 pages, mostly drawn from the memories of active CIA officers in 1973, were turned over at that time to three different investigative panels _ President Ford's Rockefeller Commission, the Senate's Church committee and the House's Pike committee.

The panels spent years investigating and amplifying on these documents. And their public reports in the mid-1970s filled tens of thousands of pages. The scandal sullied the reputation of the intelligence community and led to new rules for the CIA, FBI and other spy agencies and new permanent committees in Congress to oversee them.
"Led to new rules"? As if the CIA concerned itself with such trivial things as rules or laws. I'm sure all the victims of extraordinary rendition to countries like Egypt and Syria (where torture is fun!) can tell you all about what the CIA thinks of rules and oversight.

Skeletons in the Closet

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

How the Bush Presidency will be screwing us for years - The Supreme Court shows it's colors
posted by Wally
8:16 AM

Remember this cover from The Nation magazine?


I've had it hanging above my desk for 6 1/2 years now. Unfortunately, it's only become more and more prescient as the years go by. There's as much reason as ever to worry about Bush's presidency, even as his power wanes, his popular support plummets, and his time in office winds slowly to an end. For even after Bush is long out of office, he will still be causing problems.

When we are working to clean up all of his messes, struggling to pay down the $9 Trillion national debt ($30,000 for each of us), striving to restore our tarnished reputation in the world, even if warrantless wiretapping is outlawed and stopped, we're out of Iraq and have denounced torture, endless detainments, and illegal wars, when environmental, health, and workplace safety protections are being enforced to keep us all healthy and safe, when we're working WITH the international community - maybe even leading it - in such endeavors as addressing climate change, AIDS, poverty, etc., when "Free Speech Zones" have been restored to their rightful place of "anywhere in the whole frikking country," when we think we're "making progress" to fix the damage done during his administration, Bush will still be causing problems.

Because even after George is safely out of office, tooling around in his golf cart, clearing brush in Crawford, where the most damage he can do is knocking over trees with his face when he falls off his bicycle, Justices Roberts and Alito will still be holding session. Based on their rulings over the past few days, that does not bode well for our nation or our freedoms.

Taxpayers have to pay for religious activities. We don't have the right to file suit against the government to stop them from using our tax dollars to violate the separation of church and state. SCOTUS ruled that the King President can do whatever the hell he wants with the money given to him by Congress and if you don't like it, you can suck it, even if it violates one of the primary tenets laid down in the Constitution.

In a pair of somewhat contradictory rulings, the Court declared that your "Freedom of Speech" is only protected if the speech in question agrees with the right wing ideology. If the speech involves anti-abortion ads being put on TV just before an election to help put an extremist right-wing Republican into office - that's protected by the Constitution. In that case, Justice Roberts said "Where the First Amendment is implicated, the tie goes to the speaker, not the censor." Somehow, that standard doesn't seem to apply when the court doesn't agree with what the speaker is saying. In the "Bong hits for Jesus" case, they ruled that a high school student, standing on a public sidewalk, does not have the right to hold a sign that has the words "bong" and "Jesus" in the same sentence.

And finally, when the decision came down to big business versus endangered species and the environment, you don't even need to guess which way the court went. I mean, there are hardly any of those pesky endangered species that will be impacted, as opposed to thousands of people (and billions of dollars). In a ruling that sets a potentially dangerous precedent, they ruled that states can ignore the Endangered Species Act when issuing building, development, and water discharge permits. Because you know, what gets dumped into a river or stream in one state has no impact across the border in the next state.

So, yeah. Worry.
We're stuck with Roberts and Alito for a long time after Commander-guy is gone. Be sure to thank your Democratic Congresscritters for approving them.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

GOP Stalwart Lugar (R-IN) Says The Surge Is Failing - Change Course Now
posted by Wally
8:06 AM

Sen. Richard Lugar, a senior Republican and a reliable vote for President Bush on the war, said that Bush's Iraq strategy was not working and that the U.S. should downsize the military's role.

The unusually blunt assessment Monday deals a political blow to Bush, who has relied heavily on GOP support to stave off anti-war legislation.

It also comes as a surprise. Most Republicans have said they were willing to wait until September to see if Bush's recently ordered troop buildup in Iraq was working.

"In my judgment, the costs and risks of continuing down the current path outweigh the potential benefits that might be achieved," Lugar, R-Ind., said in a Senate floor speech. "Persisting indefinitely with the surge strategy will delay policy adjustments that have a better chance of protecting our vital interests over the long term."

Surge This

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

How's that surge working out for you?
posted by Clyde
8:05 AM

Conditions in Iraq 'terrifying', says U.N. envoy

U.N. special envoy to Iraq Ashraf Qadhi depicted a gloomy picture of conditions in the country despite the ongoing U.S. and Iraqi military operations to reinstate some semblance of stability.

In an interview, Qadhi said the situation in Iraq was so 'worrying' and 'terrifying' that many countries in the world feared the current violence there might go far beyond neighboring countries if not contained.

"Conditions in Iraq are a matter of concern for the U.N.," he said, adding that there was great potential for the current violence to spread far beyond Iraqi borders.

"Iraq now passes through a very sensitive stage full of potential dangers, prompting regional and world countries to declare their great fears that Iraq's problems can no longer be confined within the country's borders," he said.

(Staying the course)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

The Kids Are Alright - High school scholars tell Bush to his face "Lay off the torture"
posted by Wally
7:52 AM

Leave it to the kids to walk up to the Emperor and tell him that he has no clothes. And he does not look happy about it.
President Bush was presented with a letter Monday signed by 50 high school seniors in the Presidential Scholars program urging a halt to "violations of the human rights" of terror suspects held by the United States.


The students had been invited to the East Room to hear the president speak about his effort to win congressional reauthorization of his education law known as No Child Left Behind.

The handwritten letter said the students "believe we have a responsibility to voice our convictions."

"We do not want America to represent torture. We urge you to do all in your power to stop violations of the human rights of detainees, to cease illegal renditions, and to apply the Geneva Convention to all detainees, including those designated enemy combatants," the letter said.
It's nice to see him have the truth shoved in his face for a change, instead of first passing through the rose colored filters of his aides and handlers. It's a shame it took a bunch of high school students to make it happen, but the fact that they did gives me hope for the future.

Do Unto Others...

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, June 25, 2007
What's old and crazy and isn't going to be president?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
3:25 PM

McCain nosedives in the polls

Republican support for presidential candidate John McCain has dropped by more than 11 percentage points since early February, according to the Web site Real Clear Politics.

The senator from Arizona now receives the support of 15 percent of Republicans, down from 26.4 percent 20 weeks ago, according to the Web site, which averages the results of major opinion surveys.

Although he has always trailed GOP front-runner Rudy Giuliani in national polls, McCain slipped to third place in recent weeks behind former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson, who has not even officially declared his candidacy.

.....

Six months ago, McCain routinely received more than twice the support of Romney in both New Hampshire and Iowa.

Bushbot

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

What are they hiding?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:21 AM

The truth of course. Like everything else...

White House opposes move to declassify report on Iraq's WMDs

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The White House is resisting a move by both Republicans and Democrats to fully declassify a Senate report on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.

Republicans say the public disclosure would help show that the CIA made honest mistakes in its 2002 assessment that Iraq owned stockpiles of WMDs, when in fact it no longer did.

But the White House believes the declassification would trigger another round of negative news media coverage and Democratic-led congressional hearings, said a Senate Republican, who asked to remain anonymous because of ongoing private discussions.

The dispute revolves around an obscure federal panel, the nine-member Public Interest Declassification Board.

Last November, incoming Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman John D. Rockefeller, D-W.Va., and the outgoing chairman, Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., signed a letter to the board asking for a review of two committee reports.

DubyaMD's
Flashback:

SEC. RUMSFELD: Not at all. If you think -- let me take that, both pieces -- the area in the south and the west and the north that coalition forces control is substantial. It happens not to be the area where weapons of mass destruction were dispersed. We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.
I still laugh at this quote. Uhhhh.....Rummy.....north, south, east, and west of Baghdad refers to ANY LOCATION on the planet Earth!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

White House says Bush, like Cheney, isn't bound by rules of Executive Branch
posted by Wally
6:50 AM

The White House said Friday that, like Vice President Dick Cheney's office, President Bush's office is exempt from a presidential order requiring government agencies that handle classified national security information to submit to oversight by an independent federal watchdog.

The executive order that Bush issued in March 2003 covers all government agencies that are part of the executive branch and, although it doesn't specifically say so, was not meant to apply to the vice president's office or the president's office, a White House spokesman said.
Sorry George and Dick, but if it doesn't specifically exempt you, it includes you. You wrote the law, now you're stuck with it. Man up and deal with it.
The order aimed to create a uniform, governmentwide security system for classifying, declassifying and safeguarding national security information. It gave the archives' oversight unit responsibility for evaluating the effectiveness of each agency's security classification programs. It applied only to the executive branch of government, mostly agencies led by Bush administration appointees, as opposed to legislative and judicial offices.

In the executive order, Bush emphasized the importance of the public's right to know what its government was doing, particularly in the global campaign against terrorism. "Our democratic principles require that the American people be informed of the activities of their government," the executive order said.
Well..... we're waiting. Inform us for a change.

President is NOT above the law

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:35 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of dubya watching violinist Tourie Escobar (one half of the brother duo "Nuttin' But Stringz") in the East Room.

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, June 24, 2007
This week in Freeperville
posted by Clyde
6:29 AM

Another peek at the hapless hacks of hokum

Praying for PresiDunce Bush
The Lord woke me at 4:30 this morning and put on my heart to pray for the President - wisdom and discernment. Also .. praying for the peace of Jerusalem. (Link)

No that was acid indigestion from the bbq opossum shanks

Ex-girlfriends support Thompson
Won't it be refreshing to hear good things from the ex's of a President for a change? (Link)

Definitely a values voter don't you think?

Bush's immigration bill
I don't know about a law suit,but I'm thinking an article of impeachment might be do-able !!! (Link)

WHOA the "I" word? Freepers are getting upset!

Bush close to shutting down Guantanamo
If they do this, this will be the last nail in the coffin of the Repupblican Party (Link)

Closing Gitmo would only help, being as most of the "Repupblican" Party is going to jail.

Military sees drop in black recruits
So we're maintaining the recruitment goals yet 30% less blacks are signing up....I guess another color is filling the gap? (Link)

Psst - your white sheet is showing.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Want to bet that Cheney's pissed
posted by Clyde
5:55 AM

US House votes to deny all aid to Saudi Arabia

The US House of Representatives has voted to deny all aid to Saudi Arabia, despite repeated assurances by the administration the desert kingdom was cooperating with the United States in the war on terror.

The ban is contained in a little-publicized amendment quietly slipped by a bipartisan group of lawmakers into a 34.2-billion-dollar bill financing US foreign operations in fiscal 2008.

The massive bill, featuring a wide range of humanitarian programs, was approved by lawmakers in the middle of the night on Friday.

Similar measures on aid to Saudi Arabia have been passed by the House before. But the current one goes a step further by closing a legislative loophole that in the past had allowed the administration of President George W. Bush to waive these bans by invoking requirements of the war on terror.

(Terror State)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, June 23, 2007
Iraqi al-Qaida number 4 gets nervous
posted by Clyde
5:14 AM

2 al-Qaida leaders captured in Iraq

U.S. and Iraqi troops captured two senior al-Qaida militants and seven other operatives Saturday in Diyala province, an Iraqi commander said, as an offensive to clear the volatile area of insurgents entered its fifth day.

The U.S. military also cracked down elsewhere in Iraq, saying in a statement that seven other al-Qaida fighters were killed and 10 suspects detained in raids in Tikrit, east of Fallujah, south of Baghdad and in Mosul.

Three other militants suspected of having ties to Iran were detained in a predawn operation by U.S. forces working with Iraqi informants in Baghdad's main Shiite district of Sadr City, the military said separately.

The Americans have accused Tehran of providing mainly Shiite militias with training and powerful roadside bombs known as explosively formed projectiles, or EFPs, that have killed hundreds of U.S. troops in recent months.

(Same story same tune)

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

So much for promoting abstinence
posted by Clyde
5:00 AM

Lawmaker urges condoms for border control

A congressman is pushing a not-so-quick fix in the debate over illegal immigrants from Mexico: free contraceptives.

"A slower rate of growth of Mexico's population would improve the economy of Mexico. It would also reduce the environmental pressure on Mexico's ecosystem. But a slower rate of growth would also reduce the long-term illegal immigration pressure on America's borders," reasoned Rep. Mark Kirk, who also supports stronger border security in the short-term.

In reality, fertility rates have plunged in Mexico since 1980, when an average couple would have five or more children. Now, the country's fertility rate has dropped to 2.5 children, compared to 2.1 for the United States, according to United Nations data.

Kirk, an Illinois Republican, made the argument on Thursday during a heated debate in the House of Representatives over whether the U.S. government should be allowed to donate condoms and other contraceptives to family planning agencies abroad that also engage in abortion.

(Pro-Life?)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, June 22, 2007
Finally, some balls
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:17 PM

White House contempt

House Judiciary Committee Democrats warned yesterday they would pursue a contempt of Congress motion if the White House fails respond to subpoenas for testimony and documents related to the firings of U.S. attorneys last year.

The deadline for a response is Thursday, June 28. If the White House does not comply, it opens the possibility of a constitutional showdown between the two branches. In an ironic twist, the Department of Justice (DoJ) would be called on to enforce the contempt motion.

During yesterday's testimony by Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty, panel Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) asked McNulty whether he would enforce such a motion. McNulty responded that he would recuse himself from handling such matters because of an internal DoJ investigation into the U.S. attorneys matter.

.....

Others who could face contempt motions include ex-White House Counsel Harriet Miers and former White House political director Sara Taylor. Last week, the House Judiciary Committee voted to subpoena testimony from Miers, while the Senate Judiciary panel voted to subpoena testimony from Taylor.

Sack

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Olbermann: Dick Cheney is a rogue nation.
posted by Wally
9:05 AM

Olbermann discusses Cheney's assertion that he's outside of the Executive Branch, and therefore not beholden to any laws whatsoever, and how this might backfire for him. "If Mr. Cheney succeeded in legally carving himself out of the Executive Branch, would he not also necessarily abdicate many of the protections of that branch? The ones that have shielded him in this cone of silence?"

The President's (poll numbers) have sunk so low we learn today he cannot even run the Vice President. A Bush Executive Order commands everyone in the Executive Branch to report on handling of classified material, but Dick Cheney has not done so since 2002. Today the House Oversight Committee revealed that in 2004 the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) tried to inspect Cheney's office but was denied entry. In fact Cheney responded by trying to destroy ISOO.

Why the lack of cooperation? His office says "the reporting requirement does not apply to Cheney's office which has both legislative and executive functions." In other words, his functions outside the Executive Branch exempt him from oversight "by" the Executive Branch.


But if he's outside the Executive Branch, he's not a legislator and not a judge, there remains only one possible alternative: Vice President Dick Cheney is a rogue nation.

Despite the recent capture of his top lieutenant, Mr. Cheney continues to defy the rule of law, attempting to destroy ISOO, an office of the US government after all, and barring inspections in true Saddam style, leaving only one possible remedy.
Invade him.
Classic K.O.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Closing Gitmo? Will they or won't they?
posted by Wally
7:58 AM

We saw the mainstream media going ga-ga over the story that Bush is planning to close Gitmo. Since they are wrong so consistently and so often with "big" stories like this, we figure that this can only mean one thing: Gitmo is staying open forever.

Then the Bush administration started denying any such thing, and our brains started to sizzle. Since they are physiologically unable to tell the truth, this has to mean that the prisoners at Gitmo are already helping to pack up the waterboards and dog leashes for the move to Leavenworth. Rather then speculate wildly (you regular readers know that we would never, ever do that), here's both sides. You figure it out.

W.H. Decision Near to Close Guantanamo
The Bush administration is nearing a decision to close the Guantanamo Bay detainee facility and move the terror suspects there to military prisons elsewhere, The Associated Press has learned.

President Bush's national security and legal advisers are expected to discuss the move at the White House on Friday and, for the first time, it appears a consensus is developing, senior administration officials said Thursday.

The advisers will consider a proposal to shut the center and transfer detainees to one or more Defense Department facilities, including the maximum security military prison at Fort Leavenworth in Kansas, where they could face trial, said the officials. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were discussing internal deliberations.
Will They?

Decision on Guantanamo not imminent, U.S. says

"No decisions on the future of Guantanamo Bay are imminent," said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino. "The president has long expressed a desire to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility and to do so in a responsible way."

"It's no longer on the schedule for tomorrow," said White House National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe. "Senior officials have met on the issue in the past, and I expect they will meet on the issue in the future."
Or Won't They?
Either way, whatever the administration decides to do, we have every bit of confidence, based on historical precedent, that they'll manage to f*ck it up and make the situation even worse.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
7:49 AM

Use the Post a Comment link to submit your caption of Bush at the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant in Athens, AL

Permalink :: 6 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, June 21, 2007
That's Not How They Teach It In Civics Class - Cheney Says The V.P. Is Not Part Of The Executive Branch
posted by Wally
3:36 PM

You can't make this shit up. The Vice President of the United States is either a complete moran who has no clue about his own job after 6 years, or he's absolutely batshit crazy. I'm leaning towards both.

Cheney told the House Oversight Committee that he doesn't have to worry about any of those silly presidential laws about safeguarding classified information, because.... well, just read the article from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform:
Vice President Exempts His Office from the Requirements for Protecting Classified Information

The Oversight Committee has learned that over the objections of the National Archives, Vice President Cheney exempted his office from the presidential order that establishes government-wide procedures for safeguarding classified national security information. The Vice President asserts that his office is not an "entity within the executive branch."

As described in a letter from Chairman Waxman to the Vice President, the National Archives protested the Vice President's position in letters written in June 2006 and August 2006. When these letters were ignored, the National Archives wrote to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales in January 2007 to seek a resolution of the impasse. The Vice President's staff responded by seeking to abolish the agency within the Archives that is responsible for implementing the President's executive order.

In his letter to the Vice President, Chairman Waxman writes: "I question both the legality and wisdom of your actions. ... [I]t would appear particularly irresponsible to give an office with your history of security breaches an exemption from the safeguards that apply to all other executive branch officials."

Documents and Links:
Chairman Waxman's Letter to the Vice President
Letter from National Archives to the Attorney General
Second Letter from National Archives to the Vice President's Office
First Letter from National Archives to the Vice President's Office
Fact Sheet on the Vice President's Efforts to Avoid Oversight and Accountability


EDIT: As my good friend Nancy pointed out last night, if Cheney's not part of the Executive Branch, how the hell can he keep crying "Executive Priviledge" everytime someone asks him for information? Can't have it both ways, Dick.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Besides little boys, the Republicans finally get behind something
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:14 PM

What's in your wallet? Here's what's in theirs...

Big oil companies spared tax hikes

WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked a $32 billion package of tax breaks for renewable energy that would have been financed mostly by new taxes on major oil companies.

Democrats came three votes short of overcoming a threatened GOP filibuster that was keeping the measure from being attached to a broader energy bill. Republican senators argued that the nearly $29 billion in additional taxes on major oil companies would have led to reduced production and higher gasoline prices.

Because of Republican opposition, Democrats needed 60 votes to allow the package to come up for a vote, but fell short, 57-36. With a number of senators not voting, Democrats could resurrect the measure later, though there was no immediate indication of that.

$3.00/g
In case you were wondering, here's a chart of Exxon stock the last five years:

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Is North Korea no longer part of the "Axis of Evil"?
posted by Wally
8:24 AM

Remember the good old days, when George W. Bush introduced us to the "axis of evil" of Iran, Iraq, and North Korea in his January 29, 2002 State of the Union speech. Oh those were the days. When we knew who our enemies were - who was "with us" and who was "with the terrorists." We knew, of course, because the president told us, and the puppy-dog media repeated it ad-nauseum.

We knew who the bad guys were, and we knew how to deal with them. Tyrants were not to be dealt with lightly. As Vice President Cheney said on 12/12/2003 "I have been charged by the President with making sure that none of the tyrannies in the world are negotiated with. We don't negotiate with evil; we defeat it."

Those were simpler times. When everything was black and white, good and evil, us and them. Of course, as often as not, the administration got them confused and tried to tell us things like we were at war to keep peace, bombing people to save them, and occupying their nation to liberate them, but that's not my point. My point is that things were simpler then. There were no shades of gray, no need for subtlety or complexity of thought. And we all knew for sure that we did NOT "negotiate with evil."

So what's this all about then?

U.S. Holds Direct Talks in North Korea
The United States' chief nuclear negotiator began a surprise two-day visit to North Korea today, saying he wanted to speed up six-nation talks aimed at dismantling North Korea's nuclear program.

In the first visit to Pyongyang by a senior American official in nearly five years, the envoy, Christopher R. Hill, was scheduled to meet senior North Korean officials, including his counterpart, Kim Kye-gwan, for one-on-one talks.

Mr. Hill's trip came just hours after the United States found a way to return to the North roughly $25 million in funds that were frozen for several years. The United States had frozen the money, saying it came from counterfeiting and trade in missiles and nuclear equipment.

In the next step, the North is supposed to provide the United States and the other participants in the six-party negotiations on the issue - Japan, South Korea, Russia and China - with a detailed list of all of its nuclear programs and facilities.
That sounds like "negotiating" to me. Which leaves only one of two options. Either North Korea has suddenly become not evil - which seems highly unlikely - or Bush and Cheney changed their minds and decided it's okay to negotiate with evil after all. What to Republicans call that again? Oh yeah....

Flip Flop

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

FBI docs show that some guy named Osama chartered the flights to get the bin Laden family out of the U.S. after 9/11
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:53 AM

Remember just a few days after 9/11, when the reality was sinking in and the shock was beginning to wear off. The airports were closed and all planes were grounded, and people were trying to figure out how to get home, or how to contact their families. Remember how we got another shock when we heard the news that just a handful of planes were allowed to fly for the sole purpose of flying the bin Laden family out of the country?

According to FBI documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act and made public by Judicial Watch (a Washington-based group that investigates government corruption) those planes may have been chartered by none other than Osama bin Laden himself.


The document states: "ON 9/19/01, A 727 PLANE LEFT LAX, RYAN FLT #441 TO ORLANDO, FL W/ETA (estimated time of arrival) OF 4-5PM. THE PLANE WAS CHARTERED EITHER BY THE SAUDI ARABIAN ROYAL FAMILY OR OSAMA BIN LADEN...THE LA FBI SEARCHED THE PLANE [REDACTED] LUGGAGE, OF WHICH NOTHING UNUSUAL WAS FOUND." The plane was allowed to depart the United States after making four stops to pick up passengers, ultimately landing in Paris where all passengers disembarked on 9/20/01, according to the document.

Overall, the FBI's most recent document production includes details of the six flights between 9/14 and 9/24 that evacuated Saudi royals and bin Laden family members. The documents also contain brief interview summaries and occasional notes from intelligence analysts concerning the cursory screening performed prior to the departures. According to the FBI documents, incredibly not a single Saudi national nor any of the bin Laden family members possessed any information of investigative value.

"Eight days after the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history, Osama bin Laden possibly charters a flight to whisk his family out of the country, and it's not worth more than a luggage search and a few brief interviews?" asked Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "Clearly these documents prove the FBI conducted a slapdash investigation of these Saudi flights. We'll never know how many investigative leads were lost due to the FBI's lack of diligence."
Judicial Watch has the latest version of the FBI Saudi Flight Documents (all 224 pages).

In case you're wondering how something like this could be allowed to happen:

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Who are they fooling?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:45 AM

Touching the line of an oxymoron:

Officials: Iraq security plan succeeding despite 3 more mosques bombed

BAGHDAD - Inside a fortified conference room and through the prism of U.S. and Iraqi military officials, a security plan to pacify the country was working on Wednesday. Outside, extremists blew up mosques, lobbed mortars into Baghdad's heavily protected Green Zone and generated a steady drumbeat of violence.

Just hours before a top U.S. military spokesman said that troop buildups, added checkpoints and other measures launched in February were showing signs of success, suspected Shiite militiamen bombed two Sunni mosques south of Baghdad. An explosion damaged a third Sunni mosque south of the capital hours later.

No deaths were reported in the morning bombings of the Usama Bin Zaid and Abdallah Al Jobori mosques in Iskandariyah and in the afternoon one at the Sfoog mosque in Jbala. But coming the day after a truck bombing outside a Shiite mosque in the capital killed at least 78 people, the attacks stoked fears that retaliatory bombings of Muslim religious sites would escalate.

Twenty-nine unidentified bodies were found dumped on Baghdad's streets

How's that Surge?™

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Bush Veto - Part III
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:17 PM


Bush doublespeak:

"Destroying human life, in the hopes of saving human life, is not ethical."

"America is also a nation founded on the principle that all human life is sacred."

Hmmm......would you like to rephrase that?

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

George W. Bush hates America
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:04 AM

After this week, George W. Bush will be batting 1,000. You see, he will be 3 for 3 by using his veto pen on issues that Americans support.

2005 - 2006:

Poll: Stem Cell Use Gains Support
Poll: Public Backs Stem Cell Research
Bush vetoes embryonic stem-cell bill
Poll: Americans Disapprove of Bush Stem-Cell Veto
2006 - 2007:

Poll: Majority wants Iraq pullout date set
Most Americans back Iraq pullout timetable: poll
CBS Poll: Public Backs Iraq Timetable
Bush vetoes Iraq timetable
Poll: Americans disapprove of Bush's Iraq veto
2007 -

Poll: American, Republican Support for Embryonic Stem Cell Research Increasing
Americans Believe President Bush Should Not Veto Stem Cell
Bush to veto stem cell bill today
Take a guess what the next headline will be. Anyone?

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Supporting the Troops, Bush style - Wife of missing soldier facing deportation
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:03 AM

Army Spc. Alex Jimenez of Lawrence, who has been missing since his unit was attacked by insurgents in Iraq on May 12, had petitioned for a green card for his wife, Yaderlin, whom he married in 2004, WBZ-TV reported.

Their attorney, Matthew Kolken, said Yaderlin illegally entered the U.S. from the Dominican Republic in 2001. Her husband's request for a green card and legal residence status for her alerted authorities to her situation, Kolken said.

The attorney said his client would not be eligible for a green card under normal circumstances, but he is seeking a hardship waiver for her. If she were to have to leave the U.S., she would have to wait 10 years before reapplying.

"I can't imagine a bigger injustice than that, to be deporting someone's wife who is fighting and possibly dying for our country," Kolken told the station.

Is this still America?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush picks another winner - nominee for CIA's top lawyer has no "specific objections" to torture
posted by Wally
8:43 AM

John Rizzo has been serving as the temporary General Council for the CIA since August 2004. Wait, "temporary" since 2004? He's finally now getting a Senate confirmation hearing after 3 years as a "temp"? Oh, that's right, Bush had a Republican rubber-stamp Congress for most of that time, so he didn't have to worry about such trivial formalities as Senate approvals of his appointments.

Sorry... where were we? Oh yeah, Mr. Rizzo stood before the Senate Intelligence Committee to argue that he should be upgraded from "temporary" to "permanent" general counsel, and told them that "he did not object to a 2002 memo authorizing interrogation techniques that stop just short of causing a sensation of impending organ failure or even death."
The August 2002 memo, written by a senior Justice Department lawyer, said that for an interrogation technique to be torture, it must inflict physical pain that is difficult to endure.

Written for then-White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales and shared with the CIA, the memo did not lay out specific techniques that could be used. Yet it drew a blurry line that could not be crossed by defining torture as any technique that produces pain equal to a serious physical injury, such as "organ failure, impairment of bodily function or even death."

After nearly two years, the Justice Department disavowed the document in 2004. Rizzo said he agreed with the conclusion reached then, that the language appeared "over-broad." But asked if he wished he had spoken up about its contents, Rizzo said no.

"I can't honestly sit here today and say I should have objected," he said.
So what he's saying is, even though the John Ashcroft / Alberto Gonzalez Justice Department said that the practices suggested by the memo crossed the line, Rizzo still, to this day, thinks they are perfectly fine, and still doesn't find them objectionable.

I say fine. This is Bush's guy. He says torture is okay. Let's see them use his approved methods when they drag Condi and Rove and Dick and George in front of a Congressional investigating committee and start asking questions, and see how "objectional" they find it.

Are those electrodes on your nuts, or are you happy to see me?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Another rat abandons ship - Bush's budget director Rob Portman resigns
posted by Wally
8:07 AM

Citing "family reasons", yet another Bush official is getting out while the getting is good.
In the latest of a string of departures of White House aides, U.S. budget director Rob Portman announced on Tuesday he is stepping down after just over a year on the job.

Portman's departure is among several changes in the White House staff recently. White House counselor Dan Bartlett, a longtime member of Bush's inner circle, plans to leave the administration within the next few weeks and will be replaced by former Republican party chief Ed Gillespie.

White House political director Sara Taylor and deputy national security adviser J.D. Crouch have also left.
While Portman had the respect of both Republicans and Democrats alike, his replacement Jim Nussle, who was the Republican Chairman of the House Budget Committee from 2001-2006, isn't held in quite so high regard.
"The legacy of President Bush and former House Budget Committee Chairman Nussle is one of $3 trillion in new debt and six years of deficit spending," said Illinois Rep. Rahm Emanuel, who is a member of the House leadership.
Reuters
In addition to his poor policy decisions leading the budget committee, he's seen as a dick. Another Bush nominee from the John Bolton school of statesmanship. Known for his combative style, he pissed off more than a few Democrats, taking pleasure in rolling over them on budget bills in the House. While this type of personality might "be just what President Bush desires for a White House budget director whose tenure will be dominated by battles with the Democratic-controlled Congress over spending," it's not going to make the confirmation hearings any easier for him.
Already, Democrats are signaling that Nussle's combativeness may place his nomination - which is subject to Senate confirmation - in peril.

"Mr. Nussle has a reputation, deserved or not, of being an intense partisan, quite different from (outgoing budget director) Rob Portman," said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D. He said he had heard concerns about the nomination from about a half-dozen senators, and "there are going to be issues with this confirmation."
Guardian
I would like to hope so, but with the lack of sack the Dems have been showing since taking power (remember the great "Iraq spending bill cave-in"), it's hard to believe they'll do anything except issue a few strongly worded statements before escorting him into office.

Just what we need, another combative asshole in the administration.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Another corrupt Republican.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:32 AM

You've probably never heard of this guy but he has a high connection:

State Treasurer Suspended After Indictment on Drug Charges

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP, WLTX) -- South Carolina Treasurer Thomas Ravenel has been suspended from office, following his indictment by a federal grand jury for distribution of cocaine.

.....

The indictments accuse Ravenel, 44, and Michael Miller, 25, of distributing less than 500 grams of cocaine starting in late 2005. They're officially indicted on charges of conspiracy to possess and intent to distribute.

Officials say Ravenel bought the drugs from Miller to share with other people. U.S. Attorney Reggie Lloyd says Ravenel didn't sell any of the drugs. Lloyd says the investigation is just beginning.

.....

Thomas is also the founder of Ravenel Development Corp., a commercial real estate development company. As well, he serves as the state chairman for former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign. Late Tuesday, Giuliani's campaign announced he stepped down from that role.

Rudy! Rudy! Rudy!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:23 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, June 19, 2007
More Sopranos...
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:27 PM

This time Hillary Clinton unveils her new campaign song by spoofing the final episode of the Sopranos.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

GAO Study Finds That Bush Ignores The Law
posted by Wally
10:21 AM

In 1,100 Signing Statements, Bush Said He Can Ignore Laws
New GAO Report Finds Fed Agencies Believe Him 30% Of The Time

A new study done by the non-partisan General Accounting Office took a look at a "representative sample" of Bush's 1,100 signing statements. What they found shows that 1) the Bush administration feels that it can ignore the laws written by Congress, and 2) that signing statements can have a real, practical impact on how laws are carried out and enforced. They are not just philosophical exercises.

The GAO looked at 19 provisions of law that Bush had objected to with signing statements. They found that federal agencies disobeyed the law for 6 of those 19 provisions - over 31% of the time. While it is not clear that the signing statements were the reason for the agencies disobeying the law, in at least

"The administration is thumbing its nose at the law," said Rep. Conyers (D-MI), one of the lawmakers who commissioned the GAO study.

Bush's signing statements have drawn fire because he has used them to challenge more than 1,100 sections of bills -- more than all previous presidents combined. The sample the GAO studied represents a small portion of the laws Bush has targeted, but its report concluded that sometimes the government has gone on to disobey those laws.
Said Virginia Sloan, president of the Constitution Project -- a bipartisan think-tank that has condemned signing statements as a threat to the checks and balances that limit presidential power:
"The findings of this report should come as no great surprise: When the president tells federal agencies they don't have to follow the law, they often don't.... This report should put to rest any doubts as to the real impact of signing statements. The Constitution does not bestow upon the president the power to simply ignore portions of laws he doesn't like."
Or, as Senate Appropriations Committee chairman Robert Byrd (D-WV) said
"The White House cannot pick and choose which laws it follows and which it ignores. When a president signs a bill into law, the president signs the entire bill. The administration cannot be in the business of cherry-picking the laws it likes and the laws it doesn't."
Boston Globe
If anyone in Congress understands how our government is supposed to work, it's Byrd. He carries a copy of the Constitution in his pocket wherever he goes -and with good reason - I think he was alive when they were writing it.

What the report shows is that signing statements do matter. They do have a real impact on the way the government operates. They do have Constitutional ramifications, consolidating power in the executive branch, whittling away at the "balance of powers" envisioned by the Founding Fathers as a way to prevent the kinds of abuses inherent in giving too much power to one man. They are not just "peices of paper".
The GAO's findings are legally significant, said Bruce Fein, a conservative constitutional lawyer who served on an American Bar Association task force that excoriated the president's use of signing statements in a report last year. White House officials have dismissed such concerns as overblown, suggesting that the statements were staking out legal positions, not broadcasting the administration's intentions.

But the GAO report suggests that the dispute over signing statements is not an academic one, Fein said, adding that Congress could use the report to take collective legal action against the White House.
WashPost
Bush is still not a Dictator, but he's trying.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Secret Service Code Names
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:10 AM

I wonder why they named W that?

'Renegade' Joins Race For White House

Sen. Barack Obama has a new tag: "Renegade."

That's what Secret Service agents are calling the Illinois Democrat, in the time-honored tradition of giving "secret" code names to presidential candidates and other protected dignitaries. As is custom, the Obama moniker reflects something of the man himself (though he might prefer "progressive" or "independent").

Is the same true for a woman?

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) may hope so. Her code name is "Evergreen," given to her when her husband (former president Bill Clinton, a.k.a. "Eagle") first became a protectee.

Other candidates have not been as lucky. Sen. John F. Kerry (Mass.) was dubbed "Minuteman" after winning the Democratic nomination -- and, indeed, lasted not much longer than the name suggested. Former vice president Al Gore, sometimes derided as wooden, started out as "Sawhorse" but eventually became "Sundance" -- although the reason for the change is unclear.

President Bush, a protectee dating back to the days when his father was president (and with a reputation for rowdiness before he became a teetotaler) is "Tumbler." Former president Jimmy Carter, who taught Sunday school, is "Deacon." George H.W. Bush is "Timberwolf," and Ronald Reagan was "Rawhide."


Tumbler!


Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

House Investigation Finds "Extensive Destruction" of RNC Emails
posted by Wally
7:52 AM

Just like the infamous "18 minute gap" in the Watergate tapes that helped bring the Nixon presidency crashing down in 1973-74, the RNC has again been busted trying to bury evidence and hide what they've been doing.
E-mail records are missing for 51 of the 88 White House aides with Republican Party accounts, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee reported Monday.
Like in '73, it leads to the obvious question "What are they hiding?". Like in '73, even if they've done nothing wrong - an unlikely scenario with either this administration or Nixon's - it still lends the appearance of wrongdoing.

The difference between now and 1973, and this is a big difference, is that when Nixon lost those 18 minutes, it wasn't illegal to destroy the records. It looked bad, but there was no law prohibiting it. Now there is such a law. In response to the Watergate investigation, the Presidential Records Act was passed in 1978, saying, in essence, that all records of official White House business must be retained. By destroying, I mean "losing", all those emails, the RNC broke the law. Period. What's more damning, they not only broke the law, they did so intentionally and knowingly, after they were ordered not to.
The committee found that although then-White House counsel Alberto Gonzales ordered presidential staff to preserve official e-mails from outside accounts, he failed to enforce that policy.
Not only did they "lose" all of these emails, the RNC went the next mile and failed to acknowledge that most of the email accounts even existed.
The committee found 88 officials who held GOP e-mail accounts; the White House had acknowledged 50.
Oops! Those crazy Alzheimer's suffering Republicans, they just "couldn't recall" those 38 other people. Maybe someone "lost" the records (payroll, etc) showing that they existed too.
In a statement released Monday evening, campaign lawyer Eric Kuwana said the documents "are from a limited period of time years ago, have no articulated connection to the investigations of the committee, and very well may be the type and nature of political documents that are specifically exempt from the Presidential Records Act."
True enough, Eric. But they "very well may be the type and nature of political documents that are specifically" covered by the PRA. That's what Waxman is trying to find out. That's why the PRA says that the Archivist of the United States must give permission to destroy them. That's why it doesn't matter what was in them. Destroying them was breaking the law. And no matter how many signing statements he signs, and no matter how power hungry and arrogant he may become....

...the President is NOT above the Law

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

The Subpoenas
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:43 AM

If you're fans of The Sopranos like me, you'll love this...

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, June 18, 2007
They couldn't say it on the TV screen if it wasn't true.
posted by Wally
12:31 PM

For the past few years, Bush and friends have been repeatedly telling us that we can't believe what we see on "the TV screen" because all they ever show is bad news about Iraq, and that they never show all the great stories about schools being built and businesses booming and children riding their shiny new bicycles to the playground for a day frolicking on the monkey bars with all their friends.
You know, it's interesting, if you -- I'm sure people who watch your TV screens think the entire country is embroiled in sectarian conflict and that there's constant killing everywhere in Iraq. Well, if you listened to General Casey yesterday, 90 percent of the action takes place in five of the 18 provinces. And around Baghdad, it's limited to a 30-mile area. And the reason I bring that up is that while it seems to our American citizens that nothing normal is taking place -- and I can understand why, it's a brutal environment there, particularly that which is on our TV screens -- that there is farmers farming, there are small businesses growing, there's a currency that's relatively stable, there's an entrepreneurial class, there's commerce....there are people living relatively normal lives who I believe -- strongly believe that they want to continue that normalcy....
10/25/2006
Today Bush once again displayed his motto of "just listen to what I say, don't pay any attention to what I do". After a 52 minute video-conference with Iraqi leaders, he came away convinced that everything is rainbows and bunny rabbits over there.
President Bush had a nearly hour-long secure video teleconference with Iraqi leaders on Monday and came away impressed and reassured by the progress they're making on political, security and economic reforms, the White House said.

"It's clear that you've got an environment now where the key leaders are working together on these issues," during the 52-minute teleconference the president had with Iraq's prime minister, president and two vice presidents, White House press secretary Tony Snow said.

Snow acknowledged that U.S. officials have heard similar positive statements from Iraqi leaders before, but said: "We think they are very serious in moving on the key items.... I think the president was impressed and reassured by the sense of seriousness that he heard".

Riiiiight. He watched the Iraq leaders on the TV screen for an hour and now he knows everything he needs to know about progress in Iraq. Just like when he looked into Putin's soul and saw he was a man to trust too.

I think I'll go home and watch a couple reruns of Gilligan's Island so I can learn how to sail.

I know it's true, 'cause I saw it on TV

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Gonzo's plans to further politicize the Dept of Justice
posted by Wally
10:04 AM

Atty Gen. Alberto Gonzales so far has survived a political crisis over the firing of nine U.S. attorneys, a rare potential vote of no-confidence in the Senate and numerous calls for his resignation.

His response? Gonzales recently proposed tightening the leash on the men and women who prosecute federal crimes across the nation.

Gonzales described what he delicately calls "a more vigorous and a little bit more formal process" for annually evaluating prosecutors. What that means, as he explained it, is hauling in every U.S. attorney for a meeting to hear, among other things, politicians' beefs against the prosecutor.

(snip)

Of course, there's already an evaluation process run by the Justice Department's executive office for U.S. attorneys. But that only measures how well a prosecutor runs the office, not how loyal he or she is to the administration's agenda.
How loud would the republicans be screaming if this happened while Clinton was in office? How happy will they be when President Hillary (or Obama, or Edwards, or Gore, or...) has this kind of power?

I don't recall

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Only one book needed
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
9:58 AM

Knowing Bush, the library will cost $100 billion dollars or so....

Rove may lead Bush library

President Bush isn't leaving it to strangers to take care of his legacy project, the George W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum. Playing key roles are political aide Karl Rove, first lady Laura Bush, and former Chief of Staff Andy Card. The trio has been interviewing architects and touring similar research campuses for tips. We hear that some are urging Bush to put Rove in charge once it's built.

My Pet Goat

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sen Mitch McConnell (R-KY): Troops will come home by Sept. General Petraeus: September? Yeah right, maybe September of 2017.
posted by Wally
7:22 AM

In a classic example of Republican denial / aversion to reality, similar to the "global warming hoax" or the "evolution fallacy", the Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) still claims that the surge is working and that things will be going swimmingly in Iraq just as soon as the Iraqi's stand up so we can stand down - some time in the fall.
"I think everybody anticipates that there's going to be a new strategy in the fall," McConnell said on CBS's Face the Nation. "I don't think we'll have the same level of troops, in all likelihood, that we have now. The Iraqis will have to step up, not only on the political side, but on the military side, to a greater extent."
On the other hand, Gen. David Petraeus the man in charge of the Surge has a slightly different opinion of the situation.
The odds of building a stable Iraqi government by September are slim, even with the addition of 30,000 U.S. troops to give lawmakers in Baghdad security, said the top U.S. general in the Middle East country.
Petraeus also said we could have troops in Iraq for a decade. Others, including former U.S. General Jay Garner, who was appointed two months before the invasion to head reconstruction in Iraq, have even worse assessments of the situation.
The man who led the initial American effort to reconstruct Iraq after the war believes the country is on the brink of a genocidal civil war and its government will fall apart unless the US changes course and allows a three-way federal structure. He has also urged talks with Iran and other regional players.
And of course, the Republican Senator from Kentucky blames the Iraqi government for all the problems the country faces.
"The Iraqi government has been a pretty big disappointment. We've given them an enormous opportunity here, over the last four years, to have a normal country. And so far, they haven't been table to take advantage of this opportunity and our commitment will not be there forever", says Senator McConnell.
An opportunity to be a normal country? Excuse me, but how messed up are things in Kentucky that McConnell thinks that daily suicide bombings, random detainments, torture, kidnapping, midnight house invasions and arrests, lack of electricity, water, medical care, etc, genocide, and foreign occupation "Normal"? The Iraqi gov't is a disappointment? That should come as no surprise, seeing as half of the major players, including Prime Minister Nuri al Maliki, were hand-picked by the Bush administration. Every thing Bush does is a disappointment. At least he didn't blame Clinton.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:47 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Bush at the Boys and Girls Club

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, June 17, 2007
This week in Freeperville
posted by Clyde
6:35 AM

Biting barbs by the bigoted

This week's trip through the world of single molar politics! Can you guess what is on their mind?

Praying for PresiDunce Bush
Dear Heavenly Father: We pray that President Bush will stay away from evil men like Ted Kennedy and that he'll see the light that filling America up with illegal aliens fails to further anything good. Please, Dear Father, help him to hear the voices of the American citizens. (Link)

I never knew Christ preached xenophobia from the mount.

Stolen watch
And here is one better: who actually cares if his watch was stolen? That is what he gets from hanging around in a crowd of foreigners. More than that will be stolen if he gets away with his mexican amnesty sham. (Link)

Bush hanging around with foreigners in Albania? MORAN!

JCS Chairman Pace's forced retirement
The man is a Marine and he just got his ass kicked unjustly. What a sad, sorry White House. Not an ounce of fight in them for one of their own, but all out for the mexicans. (Link)

Now that is one hell of a segue, this boy's got talent!

Veto threat on spending
Bush : We need that money for "mis amigos". (Link)

Bi-lingual posting? Quick, someone put a fence around that guy!
Libby
How long will it take for Libby to change his name ligally to Juan Mendoza? Then he'll see some action out of the White House. Or maybe he could just call his senator on the spanish language line. (Link)

Ligally? Gradiate of the Jethro Bodine skul of Lernin?

These people take the herd mentality too seriously!

I feel icky!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Taguba comes clean
posted by Clyde
6:00 AM

Abu Ghraib Investigator Points to Pentagon

The Army two-star general who led the first investigation into detainee abuse at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq believes that senior defense officials were involved in directing abusive interrogation policies and said that he was forced to retire early because of his pursuit of the issue, says an article to be published tomorrow in the New Yorker magazine.

Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba said that he felt mocked and shunned by top Pentagon officials, including then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, after filing an exhaustive report on the now-notorious Abu Ghraib abuse that sparked international outrage and led to an overhaul of the U.S. interrogation and detention policies. Taguba's report examining the 800th Military Police Brigade put in plain terms what had been documented in shocking photographs.

In interviews with New Yorker reporter Seymour M. Hersh, Taguba said that he was ordered to limit his investigation to low-ranking soldiers who were photographed with the detainees and the soldiers' unit, but that it was always his sense that the abuse was ordered at higher levels. Taguba was quoted as saying that he thinks top commanders in Iraq had extensive knowledge of the aggressive interrogation techniques that mirrored those used on high-value detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and that the military police "were literally being exploited by the military interrogators."

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, June 16, 2007
Bush's private army fights its private war
posted by Clyde
6:13 AM

Iraq Contractors Face Growing Parallel War

BAGHDAD -- Private security companies, funded by billions of dollars in U.S. military and State Department contracts, are fighting insurgents on a widening scale in Iraq, enduring daily attacks, returning fire and taking hundreds of casualties that have been underreported and sometimes concealed, according to U.S. and Iraqi officials and company representatives.

While the military has built up troops in an ongoing campaign to secure Baghdad, the security companies, out of public view, have been engaged in a parallel surge, boosting manpower, adding expensive armor and stepping up evasive action as attacks increase, the officials and company representatives said. One in seven supply convoys protected by private forces has come under attack this year, according to previously unreleased statistics; one security company reported nearly 300 "hostile actions" in the first four months.

The majority of the more than 100 security companies operate outside of Iraqi law, in part because of bureaucratic delays and corruption in the Iraqi government licensing process, according to U.S. officials. Blackwater USA, a prominent North Carolina firm that protects U.S. Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker, and several other companies have not applied, U.S. and Iraqi officials said. Blackwater said that it obtained a one-year license in 2005 but that shifting Iraqi government policy has impeded its attempts to renew.

Mercenaries

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Another rat flees burning ship
posted by Clyde
6:08 AM

Official close to attorney firings quits

"When yet another significant player resigns in the U.S. attorney scandal, it only deepens the mystery of who targeted U.S. attorneys for firing, why they did it, and what exactly is going on in the highest reaches of the Justice Department and who is filling the vacuum of leadership that has developed there," said Conyers, D-Mich.

As McNulty's top aide, Elston's duties included overseeing the government's 93 U.S. attorneys nationwide. Elston helped plan and carry out the firings of seven of the eight prosecutors who were dismissed in 2006 - firings which were orchestrated by two of Gonzales' top aides beginning shortly after the 2004 elections. Elston also called several of the U.S. attorneys afterward trying to quell the growing outcry.

At least four of the prosecutors Elston contacted said they felt threatened by his calls, which they interpreted as demands to stay quiet about why they were fired. Congress is investigating the firings, which Democrats believe were politically motivated.

Elston and his attorney, Bob Driscoll, said the phone calls were never meant to be threatening.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, June 15, 2007
FOX
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
3:25 PM

No need to tell you they're bad at reporting:

You'd think they'd know the names of popular evangelists.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Half-mast 24 X 7
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
11:01 AM

Bill OKs Lowering Flags When Troops Die

Legislation passed by Congress would require all federal agencies in a state to comply with a governor's request that they fly their flags at half-staff to honor a fallen service member.

The bill, which now goes to President Bush for his signature, was crafted by Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., who was upset by what he said was the "inconsistent, patchwork display of respect" in his state toward troops killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The House passed the bill in May and the Senate approved it late Thursday _ Flag Day _ on a voice vote.

The measure would amend federal law with regard to the flying of the national flag at half-staff to allow a governor to require that federal facilities in the state lower their flags when a member of the armed forces from that state dies while on active duty.

3,513

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:54 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of dry-drunk Dubya and Bulgarian President Georgi Parvanov


Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, June 14, 2007
Walton to Scooter: Go to Jail. Go Directly To Jail. Do Not Pass Go. Do Not Collect $200
posted by Wally
12:07 PM

Scooter's lawyers spent the morning in front of Judge Walton trying to talk him into letting Scooter scoot until the appeals process has run it's course. Judge Walton heard both sides of the argument, then handed Libby one of these:



A federal judge said Thursday he will not delay a 2 1/2-year prison sentence for I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby in the CIA leak case, a ruling that could send the former White House aide to prison within weeks.

U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton's decision will send Libby's attorneys rushing to an appeals court to block the sentence and could force President Bush to consider calls from Libby's supporters to pardon the former aide.

No date was set for Libby to report to prison but it's expected to be within six to eight weeks. That will be left up to the U.S. Bureau of Prisons, which will also select a facility.

PMITA
Okay, so he didn't say "go directly to jail". He ordered Scooter to wander over to the pen in the next couple months, whenever the U.S. Bureau of Prisons can get around to fitting him in. But Judge Walton did deny Scooter's request to stay out of prison until the appeals process runs its course - which could be years. That would give Bush plenty of time to find a politically convenient occasion to give him one of these:



We fully expect the pardon from Bush anyway, but this makes the decision a whole lot harder, since, as soon as Libby is pardoned, he no longer has the option to "plead the fifth" when he's called before Congress to answer questions (the pardon means he doesn't suffer the possibility of "self-incrimination" - therefore the 5th Amendment doesn't apply). You can bet that Bush, Cheney, and Rove are thinking about that when deciding whether or not to pardon Scooter, or let him rot.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Another reason to love Angelina
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
11:07 AM

Angelina Jolie Blocks Fox News

Angelina Jolie's true colors came out Wednesday as she promoted a film about freedom of the press and then tried to censor all her interviews.

Jolie told Paramount Pictures publicists to ban FOX News Channel and all FOX News affiliates from covering the "Mighty Heart" premiere on the red carpet. It was only with the intervention of mortified Paramount staff that an FNC camera crew was allowed to be present.

Apparently, no one told Jolie of the highly positive review FOX News had given "A Mighty Heart" from Cannes.

Oh, baby!

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Conyers: "This subpoena is not a request, it is a demand...."
posted by Wally
6:55 AM

Michigan Democrat John Conyers Jr. demanded information and testimony from the White House today in the ongoing investigation into the forced resignations of at least eight federal prosecutors, issuing subpoenas which could lead to a legal battle between Congress and the president.

"Let me be clear: This subpoena is not a request, it is a demand on behalf of the American people for the White House to make available the documents and individuals we are requesting to help us answer the questions that remain," said Conyers, who issued the subpoenas for former White House counsel Harriet Miers' testimony and documents relating to the forced resignations in his capacity as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

"The breadcrumbs in this investigation have always led to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue," Conyers said today. "This investigation will not end until the White House complies with the demands of this subpoena in a timely and reasonable manner."

The White House has said it would allow current and former advisers to talk to committee staff, but only under strict guidelines - in private, without any transcript taken.
"In private with no transcript" is meaningless. I suppose they also demand that they not testify under oath too? Not that it matters, since with no transcript and no record and no witnesses, any "perjury" accusations become a matter of "he said/she said" - unprovable and unprosecutable - exactly what this administration wants. No accountability, no responsibility, no oversight, no laws applied to them. They continue to think they are above the law. They are not.

Conyers (and a very few others) occasionally try to remind them of that fact with tough words - the likes of which I'd love to hear coming from a lot more Democrats in Congress. Now if only they could turn those words into actions instead of rolling over like good puppies and capitulating to the spoiled brat in the Oval Office and the mean old Republicans.

The most disturbing part is that, even if Conyers and the Democrats get these people to answer the subpoenas and come before Congress, since this administration has no respect for Congress or the Courts or the rule of law or the Constitution, the only thing we'll hear from them in their "under oath" testimony is the new Republican battle cry....

"I don't recall"

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

"Startling progress", winning hearts and minds, liberating and building democracy and all that great stuff in Iraq? Maybe not so much.
posted by Wally
6:31 AM

NGOs unveils scathing report on impact of US-led war in Iraq

A coalition of non-governmental groups on Wednesday took the UN Security Council to task for its "shocking silence" on alleged violations of international law by US-led forces in Iraq and urged an early end to their mandate.

In a scathing report, the Global Policy Forum slammed the conduct of US-led coalition forces and their Iraqi government partners who "have held a large number of Iraqi citizens in 'security detention' without charge or trial, in direct violation of international law."

(snip)

"As a consequence, the US and its allies regularly kill Iraqi civilians at checkpoints and during military operations, on the basis of the merest suspicion," the 117-page report said.

"In addition to combat deaths, coalition forces have killed many Iraqi civilians," it said, adding that "a 2006 study estimates more than a half million 'excess' deaths since 2003."
The report also talks about torture, "massive corruption and stolen oil", the inability to rebuild or provide even basic services like electricity, water, medical care, etc. Obviously, especially in light of the recent bombings of mosques and shrines across Iraq, the surge is working. That's what George keeps telling us. Would he lie about something like that?

Startling Progress

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, June 13, 2007
28%
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
3:18 PM

American voters disapprove 65 - 28 percent of the job President George W. Bush is doing, his lowest score ever in a Quinnipiac University national poll.

"It will be interesting to see how low President Bush's numbers can drop," Carroll said.


Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Debbie does dirka dirka....
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
12:54 PM

Sad. I was really looking forward to seeing Iran's newest rising star....

Iran moves to execute porn stars

Iran's parliament on Wednesday voted in favor of a bill that could lead to death penalty for persons convicted of working in the production of pornographic movies.

With a 148-5 vote in favor and four abstentions, lawmakers present at the Wednesday session of the 290-seat parliament approved that "producers of pornographic works and main elements in their production are considered corruptors of the world and could be sentenced to punishment as corruptors of the world."

The term, "corruptor of the world" is taken from the Quran, the Muslims' holy book, and ranks among the highest on the scale of an individual's criminal offenses. Under Iran's Islamic Penal Code, it carries a death penalty.

The "main elements" refered to in the draft include producers, directors, cameramen and actors involved in making a pornographic video.

Bowchickabowbow

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Senate Seeks Justice at the Dept of Justice - 2 more subpoenas issued
posted by Wally
10:38 AM

With the plot thickening, the allegations, denials and lies swirling, new revelations percolating to the surface, and the cast of characters continuing to grow in the Dept of Justice corruption saga, it's getting to the point you practically need a scorecard to keep up. Democrats are adding two more names to that DOJ scorecard, in the form of congressional subpeonas.

The House wants to talk to former White House Council (and failde SCOTUS nominee) Harriet Miers. The Senate is interested in getting to better know a not so familiar name - former White House Political Affairs Director Sara Taylor. I'm sure we'll be hearing a lot more about her in the coming weeks.
The Senate Judiciary Committee's subpoena for Taylor compels her to testify on July 11, while the House Judiciary Committee's subpoena for Miers compels her testimony the next day.

It's the first time during the five-month investigation that Congress is compelling testimony from White House insiders over the firings. Not yet on the subpoena list is President Bush's top political adviser, Karl Rove, but only because Democrats have not yet finished interviewing those below him, the officials said.
Subpoenas
The reasons that these two are finally getting called before Congress is that the Dems are carefully and slowly peeling back the layers, like peeling an onion, getting deeper, and closer to the center with each new revelation. Digging through the layers of emails that the DOJ finally released to the Congress, it was revealed that Harriet Meirs and aides to Rove were much more involved in the inner workings of the Justice Department than they were willing to admit.
The new records provide a peek at the actions of the White House, which has repeatedly refused Democratic demands for records and sworn testimony related to the issue.

"These documents show that the White House played an integral role in the firings and their aftermath," said House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.). "This only underscores the need for White House cooperation with this investigation."

The 46 pages of e-mails show that Miers and others -- including her deputy, William Kelley, and the White House political affairs director at the time, Sara M. Taylor -- were involved in spirited and sometimes angry e-mail exchanges as the secretive firings operation began to unravel in public. Many of the exchanges also included D. Kyle Sampson, who coordinated the firings as Gonzales's chief of staff.

White House officials appeared to be particularly concerned about the political fallout over the firing of prosecutor Bud Cummins of Little Rock, who was replaced by Tim Griffin, a former Rove aide. On Feb. 16, for example, Taylor sharply criticized the testimony of Deputy Attorney General Paul J. McNulty, who had told the Senate Judiciary Committee that Cummins was removed to make way for Griffin. The subject line of the e-mails read: "McNulty Strikes Again."
WashPost
Ms. Taylor got her panties in a bunch because McNulty told the truth about Rove's old buddy, while under oath, to Congress. She's pissed because he obeyed the law and upheld his oath. That's all you need to know about this administration.

In other DOJ news:
Shlozman wants a "do-over" for his Congressional "under oath" testimony.
A former senior Department of Justice official acknowledged Tuesday that he initially provided inaccurate testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week.

Bradley Schlozman, a former acting assistant attorney general and U.S. attorney, clarified his testimony in a letter to committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.).
We knew he was lying
So he lied under oath, and now he's sending a letter correcting his lies? Why should we believe him now?

Do you think they'll let the guys stuck in Gitmo send a letter clarifying the testimony they gave during their "enhanced interrogation"?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Lieberman asked to resign from his own party
posted by Wally
7:18 AM

You can't make this stuff up.
(WTNH) _ The Connecticut for Lieberman Party is calling on Senator Joseph Lieberman to resign from the U.S. Senate following his remarks made Sunday on CBS' Face the Nation regarding military action against Iran.

Lieberman said on the national television program that, "we've got to be prepared to take aggressive military action against the Iranians."

The Connecticut for Lieberman Chair, Dr. John Orman, called for Lieberman's resignation saying that he "crossed the line" and "no longer represents the views of the citizens of Connecticut."

Orman, a longtime critic of Lieberman, took control of the minority party back in January.
Even the Connecticut for Lieberman Party thinks Joe Lieberman....

...SUCKS!

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:33 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of * and the Pope

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Your tax dollars at work - Pentagon Confirms It Sought To Build A 'Gay Bomb'
posted by Wally
1:13 PM

A Berkeley watchdog organization that tracks military spending said it uncovered a strange U.S. military proposal to create a hormone bomb that could purportedly turn enemy soldiers into homosexuals and make them more interested in sex than fighting.

"The Ohio Air Force lab proposed that a bomb be developed that contained a chemical that would cause enemy soliders to become gay, and to have their units break down because all their soldiers became irresistably attractive to one another," Hammond said after reviwing the documents.

Hammond said the government records he obtained suggest the military gave the plan much stronger consideration than it has acknowledged.

Hello Thailor!
What we want to know is:

Was George W. "Fabulous" Bush there for the test?




Aside from these pictures, there is ample evidence suggesting that the Commander Guy had more than one reason to flaunt his codpiece in front of an aircraft carrier full of sailors, or for engaging in some more intimate moments - which we would really rather not know about - with Vladimir Putin: "I looked the man in the eye.... I was able to get a sense of his soul."



Things like this, and a whole litany of "Fabulous" examples put together by Betty Bowers make us wonder, is the Pentagon hiding something? (of course they are). Did they really try to build a bomb to turn people gay? If so, was George Bush a part of the testing program?

NOTE: We at dubyaD40.com don't really give a rat's ass about Bush's, or anyone else's sexual preferences - with the exception, of course, of really hot women who we think should all find us irresistably attractive. We don't care if you're gay, bi, straight, curly.... that's your own personal thing, and none of our affair. What pisses us off is the frikking hypocracy of the right-wing christo-fascist nazi brigade telling everyone they can't love who they want to love, and then being caught with their pants down doing what they've been crusading against. People like Ted Haggard and Mark Foley, for instance.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Fox News: We distort. You abide.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
12:59 PM

Interestingly enough, I found this on their own web site:

War Takes Up Less Time on Fox News

On a winter day when bomb blasts at an Iraqi university killed dozens and the United Nations estimated that 34,000 civilians in Iraq had died in 2006, MSNBC spent nearly nine minutes on the stories during the 1 p.m. hour. A CNN correspondent in Iraq did a three-minute report about the bombings.

Neither story merited a mention on Fox News Channel that hour.

That wasn't unusual. Fox spent half as much time covering the Iraq war than MSNBC during the first three months of the year, and considerably less than CNN, according to the Project for Excellence in Journalism.

The difference was more stark during daytime news hours than in prime-time opinion shows. The Iraq war occupied 20 percent of CNN's daytime news hole and 18 percent of MSNBC's. On Fox, the war was talked about only 6 percent of the time.

The independent think tank's report freshens a debate over whether ideology drives news agendas, and it comes at a delicate time for Fox. Top Democratic presidential candidates have refused to appear at debates sponsored by Fox. Liberals find attacking Fox is a way to fire up their base.

Fox "News"

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Another Reason Gonzo Must Go - Broke Law by Appointing Immigration Judges Based on GOP Ties Over Qualifications
posted by Wally
8:52 AM

The Bush administration increasingly emphasized partisan political ties over expertise in recent years in selecting the judges who decide the fate of hundreds of thousands of immigrants, despite laws that preclude such considerations, according to an analysis by The Washington Post.

At least one-third of the immigration judges appointed by the Justice Department since 2004 have had Republican connections or have been administration insiders, and half lacked experience in immigration law, Justice Department, immigration court and other records show.

Two newly appointed immigration judges were failed candidates for the U.S. Tax Court nominated by President Bush; one fudged his taxes and the other was deemed unqualified to be a tax judge by the nation's largest association of lawyers. Both were Republican loyalists.

Justice officials also gave immigration judgeships to a New Jersey election law specialist who represented GOP candidates, a former treasurer of the Louisiana Republican Party, a White House domestic policy adviser and a conservative crusader against pornography.
Remember, no matter how unqualified, incompetent, biased, or corrupt a judge might be, the appointment is for life. Once these guys are in place, it takes impeachment to get rid of them.

No wonder the loyal "Bushies" in the GOP still have "confidence" in Gonzo - they're watching him stack the courts with judges that would be hesitant to rule against them even if they slaughtered babies on the 50 yard line at half-time of the Super Bowl. With him in power, they can do whatever they want without fear of prosecution. Where are the Dems? More importantly, where are the Dems' balls?

Don't impeach him. Arrest him

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush gets a "Hero's Welcome" in Albania - if by "Hero's Welcome" you mean "stealing his watch"
posted by Wally
7:46 AM

Last week in Albania, while George was being greeted by the "adoring" Albanians, he reached into the crowd to shake hands, and when he pulled his arm out, his wrist was just a little lighter than before.

You can clearly see his watch on his left arm at about the :50 second mark, but by 1:15 it is obviously missing.



They should have left the watch and took him.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Senate GOP offers "blistering criticism" of Gonzo, then flip-flops and votes to block vote of no-confidence
posted by Wally
6:15 AM

After slamming Gonzales, even going so far as to flat out say that they no longer have confidence, Republicans refused to back up their words with actions. Instead, when it came time to vote, they decided "WTF, he's a Republican, and Emperor George's handpicked man, so we support him too."

On a 53-38 vote, mostly - but not entirely - along party lines, Republicans blocked a Senate no-confidence vote on Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. The resolution fell 7 short of the 60 needed to move it to full Senate debate, even in the face of increasing criticism from both parties.
There is no confidence in the attorney general on this side of the aisle," said Arlen Specter (R-PA).

"I think his continued tenure does not benefit the department or our country," said Sen Susan Collins (R-ME).
But it did succeed in putting the Republicans on record as supporting Gonzales, showing their true loyalty - to Bush and the administration and not to the country and the Constitution - and that was at least partly the point. Seven Republicans, voted with the country. The rest voted with the boy-king. Of course, so did Lieberman, the turncoat.

Bush tried to play it off as a "political trick", declaring that like a king, he answers to no one.
"They can have their votes of no confidence, but it's not going to make the determination about who serves in my government," Bush said in Sofia, Bulgaria, the last stop on a weeklong visit to Europe.
MY government? Hey asshole - it's not "your" government. Ever hear of that whole "of the people by the people for the people" thing? It's OUR government, and you are OUR employee. Take a civics class. And take the whole Republican party with you.

While several Republicans crossed over and put their votes where their mouth is, and many more offered criticism of the Gonzales, remember the bottom line. Yesterday's vote proved one thing beyond a reasonable doubt:

The GOP Has Full Confidence In Gonzo

Here's how they voted:
Voting "yes" were 45 Democrats, seven Republicans and one independent.

Voting "no" were no Democrats, 37 Republicans and one independent.

Full Roll Call

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, June 11, 2007
US Constitution struggling to climb from the wreckage of the Bush presidency - Court rules against Bush's enemy combatant policy
posted by Wally
12:11 PM

Down but not out, the Constitution is trying to make a comeback. Little by little, one by one, through the Congress and the Courts, we are seeing the revival and restoration of the rights that were quashed by the Bush administration with the help of the GOP run Congress over the past 6 years. Last week the Senate Judiciary Committee passed a bill to restore Habeas Corpus, with plans to introduce it to the full Senate for vote later this month. Today the courts chimed in, adding another voice to the call to restore Habeas Corpus and the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
The Bush administration cannot legally detain a U.S. resident it suspects of being an al-Qaida sleeper agent without charging him, a divided federal appeals court ruled Monday.

"To sanction such presidential authority to order the military to seize and indefinitely detain civilians, even if the President calls them 'enemy combatants,' would have disastrous consequences for the constitution - and the country," the court panel said.

In the 2-1 decision, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel found that the federal Military Commissions Act doesn't strip Ali al-Marri, a Qatari national and legal U.S. resident, of his constitutional rights to challenge his accusers in court.
It's a start

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sound like someone we know?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
9:53 AM

Okay, I admit I'm ashamed to post Paris news on our site. However, the more I read about the sheriff in the case, the more I thought of the Prez and his cronies. Emphasis mine:

Sheriff under fire in Paris Hilton case

This is not the first time that Lee Baca, the sheriff who opened the jail door for Paris Hilton, has had his judgment questioned.

He's been accused of using his authority to benefit friends and supporters. Since taking office he's accepted thousands of dollars worth of freebie meals, sports tickets and trips.

-snip-

Last year, the Los Angeles Times reported Baca put one of his closest friends on the payroll as a $105,000-a-year adviser.

The newspaper also said he had accepted more than $42,000 in gifts since taking office, including some from those who do business with his department.

In 2004, he took more gifts than California's other 57 sheriffs combined.

New AG?
Paris's Grandpappy donated $1,000 to his campaign

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

After years of providing targets for Sunni insurgents in Iraq, U.S. military now also giving them weapons
posted by Wally
8:31 AM

With the four-month-old increase in American troops showing only modest success in curbing insurgent attacks, American commanders are turning to another strategy that they acknowledge is fraught with risk: arming Sunni Arab groups that have promised to fight militants linked with Al Qaeda who have been their allies in the past.

American commanders say they have successfully tested the strategy in Anbar Province west of Baghdad and have held talks with Sunni groups in at least four areas of central and north-central Iraq where the insurgency has been strong. In some cases, the American commanders say, the Sunni groups are suspected of involvement in past attacks on American troops or of having links to such groups. Some of these groups, they say, have been provided, usually through Iraqi military units allied with the Americans, with arms, ammunition, cash, fuel and supplies.

Critics of the strategy, including some American officers, say it could amount to the Americans’ arming both sides in a future civil war. The United States has spent more than $15 billion in building up Iraq's army and police force, whose manpower of 350,000 is heavily Shiite. With an American troop drawdown increasingly likely in the next year, and little sign of a political accommodation between Shiite and Sunni politicians in Baghdad, the critics say, there is a risk that any weapons given to Sunni groups will eventually be used against Shiites. There is also the possibility the weapons could be used against the Americans themselves.
Used against the Americans? Ya think that might be a possibility? I have a better idea. Leave all these weapons behind and get our troops the hell out, before they get killed by their own weapons.

Helluva strategery

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Come on Harry! Remove his committee appointments!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:40 AM

I think the Dems should weigh his removal:

Lieberman: Bomb Iran

Conn. Senator Says The U.S. Should Strike If Tehran Keeps Helping Anti-U.S. Forces In Iraq

The United States should launch military strikes against Iran if the government in Tehran does not stop supplying anti-American forces in Iraq, Sen. Joe Lieberman said Sunday on Face The Nation.

"I think we've got to be prepared to take aggressive military action against the Iranians to stop them from killing Americans in Iraq," Lieberman told Bob Schieffer. "And to me, that would include a strike into... over the border into Iran, where we have good evidence that they have a base at which they are training these people coming back into Iraq to kill our soldiers."

The Senator said he was not calling for an end to the limited diplomatic efforts that are underway between Washington and Tehran.

"We can tell them we want them to stop that, but if there's any hope of the Iranians living according to the international rule of law and stopping, for instance, their nuclear weapons development, we can't just talk to them," Lieberman said. "If they don't play by the rules, we've got to use our force, and to me that would include taking military action to stop them from doing what they're doing."
What the fuck Joe? How insane are you? Why don't you strap on that armor again, pick up a gun and head on over there with your wife and kids to help out.

Thanks a lot Connecticut.

Sucks!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:24 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of dubya in Albania

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, June 10, 2007
This week's headlines - Bush visits Albania
posted by Clyde
6:47 AM

ABC - Warm welcome for Bush on first visit to Albania

CBS - Bush Visits Friendly Countries In Europe

CNN - Bush: U.N. must act now on Kosovo

MSNBC - Bush presses for Kosovo independence

And from the fairly unbalanced

Faux News - President Bush Receives Hero's Welcome in Albania

No bias here - Move along!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

This week in Freeperville
posted by Clyde
6:18 AM

Random rumblings of the retarded

Praying for PresiDunce Bush
God bless you for your obedience to pray for our President. (Link)

From Slim Pickens in the movie "1941" A Nazi! I knew it! Ya'llz in CAHOOTS!

Democrat and NRA compromise
In CLEAR contravention of the 2nd Amendment...which we must all put FIRST! (Link)

Penis envy to the twelfth power?

Cindy Sheehan selling her property in Tx
I'm so sick of this phrase "pro-war". We support our troops and hope for victory in this conflict, and even the wire services use language to make us sound like Warmongers. (Link)

You mean the conflict that didn't need to happen but you promoted?

Libby sentenced
No, he did not lie. At least that was never proven to any level of reasonable satisfaction at trial. (Link)

Hmmm.... Satisying enough for the CONVICTION!

TAKE A REALLY DEEP BREATH BEFORE YOU READ THE NEXT ONE!

Boycotting O'Reilly for Immigration Bill support
I stopped being primarily a Fox fan a year ago when it was obvious they were shills for Bush. (Link)

And it only took you 5 years, your parents must be so proud!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, June 9, 2007
Go Go Gonzo
posted by Clyde
5:05 AM

Senate set to take politically charged vote on Gonzales

The Senate will hold a politically-charged vote Monday related to a no-confidence resolution in the embattled Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

In a statement issued Friday, Sen. Charles Schumer, D-New York, an author of the no-confidence resolution, said if all senators followed their conscience, "this vote would be unanimous.'"

"However, the president will certainly exert pressure to support the attorney general, his longtime friend," Schumer added. "We will soon see where people's loyalties lie."

The attorney general is under scrutiny by Congress over last year's dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys.

(Buh Bye)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Lawyering up can be fun for the whole administration
posted by Clyde
4:37 AM

White House Beefs Up Legal Team, Adds 5 To Counsel's Office

With Congress expected to ramp up the number of probes into the Bush administration, the White House is beefing up its legal team, creating five new positions in the office of Counsel Fred Fielding.

President George W. Bush has named nine new lawyers, including the five new spots, to serve under Fielding, including J. Michael Farren, the former general counsel of Xerox Corp., who will replace William Kelley as deputy counsel.

Kelley is stepping down by the end of June to return to Notre Dame University.

The additions to Fielding's team will bring the total number of attorneys in the counsel's office to 22. The five new positions formally announced Friday have been added by Fielding since he replaced Harriet Miers in February. In addition to Farren, the White House named two new special counsels and six new associate counsels.

(Plead the 5th)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, June 8, 2007
Another sign of how well the "surge" is working - Gen. Pace gets the boot as chairman of joint chiefs of staff
posted by Wally
1:11 PM

After 6 long years of fucking up one thing after another in Iraq and elsewhere, General Peter Pace is finally getting kicked out of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced Friday he has decided against recommending Marine Gen. Peter Pace for a new term as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Gates said he had originally intended to seek another two-year term for Pace, but concluded that would have resulted in a divisive Senate confirmation focusing on the Iraq war.

But Gates said that after consulting with senators in both parties, he had concluded that "the focus of his conformation process would have been on the past and not on the future."

Gates said the decision had "nothing to do" with Pace's leadership in the war.
WTF? Gates says that Pace is getting canned because the focus would have been on the past - the Iraq Occupation era. As chairman and vice chairman of the joint chiefs, he had been in charge of the war since the very beginning, including the early planning stages. Pace was, if you will, "leading" it right from the start. But his leadership had nothing to do with it? Is Gates really that stupid? Or does he just assume that we are?

Good riddance. It's about frikking time.

Incompetence Without Bounds

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

More Christian values....
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:02 AM

Creation Museum Actor Owns Porn Site

The man picked as Adam by a museum based on the Bible's version of Earth's history led quite a different life outside the Garden of Eden, flaunting his sexual exploits online and modeling for a line of clothing with an explicit mascot.

Registration records show that Eric Linden, who portrays Adam taking his first breath in a film at the newly opened Creation Museum, owns a graphic Web site called Bedroom Acrobat. He has been pictured there, smiling alongside a drag queen, in a T-shirt brandishing the site's sexually suggestive logo.

Linden, a graphic designer, model and actor, also sells clothing for SFX International, whose initials appear on clothing to spell "SEX" from afar and serve as an abbreviation for its mascot, who promotes "free love," "pleasure" and "Thrillz."

The museum's operators, informed Thursday by The Associated Press of Linden's online appearances, acted swiftly to suspend airing of the 40-second video in which he appeared.

The clip is one of 55 featured on tours of the museum, in Petersburg, Ky., which tells what organizers call, the Bible's version of Earth's history.

Oh God! Oh God! Oh God!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

You can't spell "CoWard" without dubya - Bush chickens out on Rome visit due to security concerns
posted by Wally
7:21 AM

Poor frightened George can't go anywhere without blocking off whole neighborhoods for a half mile around. The leader of the free world - the most powerful man in the world - is a prisoner in his own cowardice and loathing - seemingly unable to leave his own bedroom without an army of security personnel.
U.S. President George W. Bush will skip a visit on Saturday to Rome's historic Trastevere neighborhood for security reasons, a spokesman for the religious group he was to have visited there said on Friday.

Asked if the change had been made because of security concerns, Sant'Egidio spokesman Mario Marazziti said: "Yes, clearly."

Italian security officials had been nervous about Bush visiting Trastevere although they decided it would go ahead.

Rome authorities had planned to effectively shut down the entire neighborhood while Bush was there.
If it was Clinton (or even Reagan or Carter or papa Bush) they would have had to close off the neighborhood because of all the adoring fans coming to catch a glimpse of a U.S. President, not because they were afraid for his life. Oh what a difference an election makes.

Pussy

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:30 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Curious George at the G8 Summit

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, June 7, 2007
Ohio Man Finds Bin Laden - at FOX Headquarters
posted by Wally
2:35 PM

An Ohio man says he has located Osama bin Laden in the United States and wants to claim the U.S. government's $25 million reward.

Using an online person search built from phone directories and other public records, Thomas Potter of Olmsted Falls, Ohio, turned up three listings for "Usama bin Laden."


The first listing put the al Qaeda leader at the California headquarters of media giant FOX Entertainment Group. The second placed bin Laden in the office of a Bethesda, Md., Internet firm owned by the son of a former Defense Department official. And the third pinpointed bin Laden's secret hideout as an unidentified location in Hermitage, Tenn.

"I understand that the FBI is offering $25 million," Potter wrote in an e-mail to the Department of Justice, alerting them to his findings. "I would like to know if the reward is tax free and if I could please receive it in cash."


Working as O'Reilly's Loofah Boy?

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

It's a start: Senate Judiciary Committee Votes to Restore Habeas Corpus
posted by Wally
11:39 AM

Today the Senate took a small step forward in the effort to try to restore some of the inalienable rights and liberties guaranteed in the Constitution that have been systematically dismantled over the past 6 years. In a 11-8 vote, the Senate Judiciary Committee decided that upholding the Constitution is more important than kissing Bush's ass and cowering in fear every time he uses the words "9/11" or "terror".
Today the Senate Judiciary Committee passed an important bill to restore habeas corpus, the sacrosanct Constitutional right to challenge government detention in court, by a vote of eleven to eight.

Habeas corpus was revoked by last year's Military Commissions Act, which has been assailed as unconstitutional and un-American by leaders across the political spectrum. Today's habeas bill was backed by the Judiciary Committee's Democratic Chairman, Patrick Leahy, and its Republican Ranking Member, Arlen Specter. "The drive to restore this fundamental right has come from both sides of the aisle," said Sharon Bradford, an attorney at the bipartisan Constitution Project, in response to today's vote. "Restoring America's commitment to the rule of law is not a partisan cause; it is a patriotic one," she added.

Today's vote means the habeas bill can now be brought to the Senate floor at any time. One source with knowledge of the legislative plan said Majority Leader Harry Reid has committed to bringing the bill to a vote within the month.

Some Democrats are pushing Reid to go further, advocating more comprehensive human rights protections and a repeal of the entire Military Commissions Act. Senator Chris Dodd, the most aggressive defender of the Constitution in the presidential race, is pushing legislation that would not only restore habeas, but also ban the use of evidence obtained through torture and recommit the U.S. to the Geneva Conventions. "We must recognize that our security is enhanced by upholding our nation's historic legal principles as we vigorously pursue terrorists," he said in a statement today.
Senator Leahy was quoted by this article in the Wash Post saying that the bill removing the right to Habeas Corpus
violated the U.S. Constitution, ignored centuries of legal practice and conflicted with U.S. calls for other nations to respect human rights.

"I implore those who supported this change to think about whether eliminating habeas truly makes America safer in the world, and whether it comports with the values, liberties ad legal traditions we hold most dear," he said.
To quote Benjamin Franklin, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Old Ben is talking to the 29%ers.

We'll be keeping an eye on this legislation, and keeping you up to date. Be sure to call and/or write your Senators and Representatives encouraging them to support this effort to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, in accordance to their sworn oath of office. It's just a start, but even the longest journey begins with one step.

Liberty and Justice For All

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Rove Named in Alabama Controversy
posted by Wally
7:56 AM

In the rough and tumble of Alabama politics, the scramble for power is often a blood sport. At the moment, the state's former Democratic governor, Don Siegelman, stands convicted of bribery and conspiracy charges and faces a sentence of up to 30 years in prison. Siegelman has long claimed that his prosecution was driven by politically motivated, Republican-appointed U.S. attorneys.

Now Karl Rove, the President's top political strategist, has been implicated in the controversy. A longtime Republican lawyer in Alabama swears she heard a top G.O.P. operative in the state say that Rove "had spoken with the Department of Justice" about "pursuing" Siegelman, with help from two of Alabama's U.S. attorneys.

The allegation was made by Dana Jill Simpson, a lifelong Republican and lawyer who practices in Alabama.


In an interview with TIME, Simpson confirmed that the "Karl" cited in her sworn statement was Karl Rove. "There's absolutely no question it was Karl Rove, no doubt whatsoever," she said. She also said she has phone records to back up the date and duration of her phone calls.

Book 'em, Dano!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

You expect "Disappearances" to happen in third world dictatorships, not the U.S.
posted by Wally
7:32 AM

Then again, Bush said more than once "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." Now we're finding out, thanks to a coalition of human rights groups, that he wasn't just kidding around.
A coalition of human rights groups is demanding the United States account for 39 so-called "ghost detainees," terror suspects it believes have been secretly imprisoned, and has published their names in a report released Thursday.

Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and four other groups have drawn up a list of 39 people they claim are held by U.S. authorities and are still missing.

"What we're asking is where are these 39 people now, and what's happened to them since they 'disappeared'?" Joanne Mariner of Human Rights Watch said in a statement.
Stories like this make me wonder how Bush sleeps at night, let alone chastises other nations for human rights violations. They also make me wonder how and why we, as Americans, stand for it and allow it to happen.

Dictator

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Even Bush's "War Czar" was skeptical about "the Surge"
posted by Wally
7:19 AM

Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute, picked by President Bush as his White House war adviser, said Wednesday he had been skeptical of Bush's decision to send thousands more U.S. troops into Iraq.

In a written response to questions by the Senate Armed Services Committee, Lute confirmed news reports that he had voiced doubts during a White House-led policy review that led to Bush's Jan. 10 announcement that 21,500 more combat troops would go to Baghdad and Anbar province.

"During the review, I registered concerns that a military 'surge' would likely have only temporary and localized effects unless it were accompanied by counterpart 'surges' by the Iraqi government and the other, nonmilitary agencies of the U.S. government," Lute wrote in a document obtained by The Associated Press.

"I also noted that our enemies in Iraq have, in effect, 'a vote' and should be expected to take specific steps to counter from our efforts," he added. "The new policy took such concerns into account. It is too soon to tell the outcome."

Quagmire

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, June 6, 2007
"Fair (skinned) and Balanced" - they all look alike to Fox News
posted by Wally
12:12 PM

Fox News mistakes one black lawmaker for another in report on indictment

In yesterday's report on the corruption indictment of Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., Fox News Channel aired footage from its archive that actually showed another black lawmaker, Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich.



A clip of the mistaken identification was posted to YouTube by a liberal blog, Talking Points Memo.

A network spokesman tells USA TODAY that this was an inadvertent error. The footage aired once, during The Live Desk w/Martha MacCallum, he says.

The network plans to apologize to Conyers and says it will acknowledge the error during this afternoon's broadcast.

Fox - where journalism goes to die

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Today's Priorities in the U.S. Military: Support the Troops + Family Values + No Child Left Behind < Bush's Iraq Occupation
posted by Wally
9:32 AM

National Guard mom arrested for refusing to abandon her 7 year old daughter

In spite of the administration's big talk about supporting the troops and family values and no child left behind, when it comes time to act they won't let any of that, or even all of that combined, get in the way of their War.
In a rare legal clash pitting a mother against the US military, Specialist Lisa Hayes of the New Hampshire National Guard surrendered yesterday to Army authorities after being charged as a deserter for refusing to fight in Iraq until a custody case involving her 7-year-old daughter was resolved.

In February, Hayes received emergency leave from her second deployment to Iraq after an alleged domestic violence incident at her former husband's house, where her daughter, Brystal Knight, was staying. As the resulting custody case moved slowly through the courts, the military ordered her back to Iraq.

Hayes, 32, a licensed nursing assistant in civilian life from Rindge, N.H., could face up to two years in a military prison if found guilty of desertion in a court martial, though an Army spokeswoman said yesterday that she would probably be discharged instead.


As the custody case unfolded, the Guard extended her leave three times before ordering her back to Iraq. Hayes did not report for duty, and on March 25, she was declared absent without leave. A month later, that charge was upgraded to desertion, in accordance with military rules.
Bush deserted the National Guard during Vietnam to go partying and now he's President. She deserts to protect her child, and she's a criminal. That, my friends, is Republican "Family Values". If you're from the right family, you're valuable. As for the rest of us....?

"Warm bodies on the front line"

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush: We're staying in Iraq as long as they want us there. Iraq Parliament: GTF Out
posted by Wally
7:46 AM

Bush didn't listened to the American people in November when we told him at the voting booth to get out of Iraq. He didn't listen to Congress when they asked him to pretty please get out of Iraq if he felt like it. He has never listened to the generals, soldiers on the ground, or "real" intelligence (not to be confused with cherry-picked intelligence supporting his pre-defined decisions) when they've told him Iraq was a losing proposition. So what makes anyone think that he'll listen to the Iraqi Parliament now that they're telling us to get the hell out?

Bush has been saying things like "We're going to stay in Iraq to get the job done, so long as the government wants us there." for some time now. We'll get out when they ask us to get out. Well George, they're asking us.
Iraqi politicians have passed a resolution requiring the government to seek parliamentary permission before asking the UN to extend the mandate for US-led forces in Iraq.

The measure was approved on Tuesday and reflects a growing disenchantment with the US-backed government.
Aljazeera
Apparently the Iraqi government thinks that they are actually sovereign over the country which they allegedly govern. They may not think that their opinion matters to Bush, but they do think they can do what they want within their own borders. And what they want is for the U.S. occupation to end.
The parliament today passed a binding resolution that will guarantee lawmakers an opportunity to block the extension of the U.N. mandate under which coalition troops now remain in Iraq when it comes up for renewal in December. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, whose cabinet is dominated by Iraqi separatists, may veto the measure.

The law requires the parliament's approval of any future extensions of the mandate, which have previously been made by Iraq's prime minister. It is an enormous development; lawmakers reached in Baghdad today said that they do in fact plan on blocking the extension of the coalition's mandate when it comes up for renewal six months from now.

Reached today by phone in Baghdad, Nassar al Rubaie, the head of Al-Sadr bloc in Iraq's Council of Representatives, said, "This new binding resolution will prevent the government from renewing the U.N. mandate without the parliament's permission. They'll need to come back to us by the end of the year, and we will definitely refuse to extend the U.N. mandate without conditions." Rubaie added: "There will be no such a thing as a blank check for renewing the U.N. mandate anymore, any renewal will be attached to a timetable for a complete withdrawal."

Without the cover of the U.N. mandate, the continued presence of coalition troops in Iraq would become, in law as in fact, an armed occupation, at which point it would no longer be politically tenable to support it.
Alternet
Not that the "Commander Guy" cares about politically tenable, or U.N. mandates, or international law, but with elections looming in '08, and with far more Republican than Democratic seats being challenged in the Senate, a "veto-proof majority" grows more and more likely. There might also be some people paying very close attention to all of this at the Hague.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:33 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption

Permalink :: 7 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, June 5, 2007
Watch out for your cornhole
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
11:08 AM

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

We can all sleep easier now that Bush has declared "The Cold War is Over"
posted by Wally
8:18 AM

PRAGUE, Czech Republic (AP) - President Bush on Tuesday challenged Russia's criticism of a proposed U.S. missile shield in Europe, saying Russia has nothing to fear from such a system and declaring "the Cold War is over."
Whew. We can all come out from under our desks and our of our bomb shelters now. I feel so much safer knowing that Bush has declared the war over, after all these years wondering "is it really over, or is that just that damn liberal media saying it over and over. If only someone trustworthy like George W. Bush would reassure me."
"It ended," Bush said in his stop at this former Soviet satellite. "The people of the Czech Republic don't have to choose between being a friend of the United States or a friend with Russia. You can be both. We don't believe in a zero-sum world."
Hey wait a minute, that's in direct contradition of when he said "you are either with us or you are against us". Now what am I supposed to believe?
Bush said he would make case directly to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"My message will be Pootie-Poot - I call him Pootie-Poot - you shouldn't fear a missile defense system," Bush said. "As a matter of fact, why don't you cooperate with us on a missile defense system."
Maybe because he's seen how you "cooperate" with Congress, and how you "cooperate" with the UN, and how you "cooperate" with NATO, and with everyone else. To Bush, "cooperation" means "you do it my way and we'll get along just fine" - or to put it another way "either you are with us or you are against us".

Cold War is hopefully not starting again

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Keith Olbermann - The Nexus of Politics and Terror
posted by Wally
7:04 AM

Keith Debunks Bush's Entire American Terror Threat

Olbermann runs through the terror timeline, showing how the White House has played the fear and terror card over and over again to counter bad news for the Bush administration and to gain political advantage.

From the mindbending idea that four guys dressed as pizza delivery men were going to out-gun all the soldiers at Fort Dix, to the not too thought out plan to blow up JFK Airport by lighting a match 40 miles away, here we go again.

Time for an update on our segment "The Nexus of Politics and Terror", instances now 13 in number, when those two worlds have overlapped and we are reminded by our government, with or without justification, that we should always fear fear-itself.


Part I (8 minutes 59 seconds)




Part II (7 minutes 52 seconds)


Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, June 4, 2007
Vet Vows To Continue Speaking Out (updated)
posted by Wally
11:25 AM

Remember this guy from the Gonzales hearing?


As most of you who do remember him are undoubtably aware, the retired Marine is in trouble. Adam Kokesh foolishy chose to exercise the First Amendment rights for which he fought so valiantly over in Iraq. Like a good Marine and a true patriotic American defending his rights and his nation, he's not backing down.
"If it is not safe for a combat veteran to come home and speak his mind, then it is not safe for anyone."
Apparently, it's not safe for anyone.
Marine Cpl. Adam Kokesh, who has already received an honorable discharge from active duty but remains part of the inactive military reserves, has been charged with being photographed wearing fatigues, with military badges removed, during a protest of the Iraq war.
The guy was wearing plain old fatigues for god's sake. You or I could buy the exact same thing at any military surplus store and wear them wherever the hell we want. Unless we're military veterans. Then our First Amendment rights apparently get overruled by military stupidity. Even the VFW, normally staunch supporters of Bush and the GOP, are speaking out in favor of Kokesh.
The nation's largest combat veterans group on Friday urged the military to "exercise a little common sense" and call off its investigation of a group of Iraq war veterans who wore their uniforms during anti-war protests.

"Trying to hush up and punish fellow Americans for exercising the same democratic right we're trying to instill in Iraq is not what we're all about," said Gary Kurpius, national commander of the 2.4 million-member Veterans of Foreign Wars.
But the Pentagon is maintaining it's stance, holding a hearing today in Kansas City to try to figure out what the hell it's supposed to do with a freedom-loving American with the balls to stand up to enemies at home as well as in foreign lands. Said Col. Dave Lapan, a Marine Corps spokesman:
"It's the political activity that is prohibited, not the type of event that it was," Lapan said. "If it had been a pro-war rally, it would still have been a violation."
Oh really? Then arrest these men and women!

They were photographed wearing full military uniforms, including military badges to support such partisan political statements as this:
To score political points, the Democratic majority in the House has shown it is willing to undermine the gains our troops are making on the ground.

The Democrats have sent their message, now it's time to send their money.
If he's guilty, they are doubly so.

Good reading: Kokesh's reply to the Marines when they told him to stop wearing his uniform at protests.

Check out his blog at http://kokesh.blogspot.com/

UPDATE:
After a daylong hearing Monday, a three-person Marine board recommended he receive a general discharge under honorable conditions, one step below an honorable discharge. It would let Kokesh keep all of his benefits.

"What that means is he is not dishonorable, and he's only kind of honorable, so in effect, the board picked the safe route," said Kokesh's attorney, Mike Lebowitz.

Said Kokesh about the ruling "I do not think it was in the Marine Corps spirit to take the easy road or to not take a stand. In the words of Dante, the hottest layers of hell are reserved for those who in times of moral crisis maintain their neutrality, and I think that's what happened here today."
LINK
Note that the ruling was just a "recommendation" and could be ignored by the two officers deciding his fate.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Uggghhhh.....
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
9:36 AM

Here's 1 of his 28%:

Arkansas GOP head: We need more 'attacks on American soil' so people appreciate Bush

In his first interview as the chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party, Dennis Milligan told a reporter that America needs to be attacked by terrorists so that people will appreciate the work that President Bush has done to protect the country.

"At the end of the day, I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001]," Milligan said to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, "and the naysayers will come around very quickly to appreciate not only the commitment for President Bush, but the sacrifice that has been made by men and women to protect this country."

Milligan, who was elected as the new chair of the Arkansas Republican Party just two weeks ago, also told the newspaper that he is "150 percent" behind Bush in the war in Iraq.

Wacko

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Plot to blow up JFK Airport more bluster than danger
posted by Wally
9:35 AM

Just like the Fort Dix plot - all talk, no capacity for action.

This looks like another overblown distraction to drum up support for Bush's wars, make it look like the dismantling of civil rights is in the interest of the country, and keep the likes of Gonzo out of the news.

While we're glad to see our law enforcement agencies doing their jobs to protect us, we don't feel it serves the greater good when a group of unfunded, untrained, unarmed, unqualified, and not even necessarily dedicated wannabe criminals are held up as bastions of terror that threaten our nation, as was quoted in this NY Times article.
"Had the plot been carried out, it could have resulted in unfathomable damage, deaths and destruction," Roslynn R. Mauskopf, the United States attorney in Brooklyn, said in a news release that announced charges against four men. She added at a news conference, "The devastation that would be caused had this plot succeeded are just unthinkable."
Be afraid! Be VERY afraid! The Bogey-Man is at the door! Trust Bush to protect you! Unthinkable. Unfathomable. Devastation. Words usually reserved for such cataclysmic events as a nuclear blast over New York City. Or maybe a major hurricane wiping out New Orleans. Using such language to describe a handful of guys with no weapons, no money, no backing, and not much more than a poorly conceived plan to blow up some fuel tanks is cowardly fear-mongering.
But the criminal complaint filed by the federal authorities against the four defendants in the case ... suggests a less than mature terror plan, a proposed effort longer on evil intent than on operational capability.

(Ms. Mauskopf noted in her news release that the "public was never at risk" and told reporters that law enforcement "had stopped this plot long before it ever had a chance to be carried out.")
Oh really? Never at risk? In that case, it's "unfathomable" and "unthinkable" that she should have used such inflammatory language.
"It has a bit of the gang that couldn’t shoot straight to it," Mr. Sonnett said. "It would have served the federal government well to say that."
Thank you for that bit of sanity, Mr. Sonnett. Even in the extremely unlikely event that they had been able to carry out their plot in it's entirety, it would have been more fizzle than bang. According to Mike Ackerman, a former CIA terrorism expert:
"Nothing could be as bad as the authorities made it sound. The fact is that pipelines are hit all the time. The leftists in Colombia have hit pipelines dozens, probably hundreds, of times, and the technology is such that sensors in the pipelines shut them down. To suggest they'd blow up half of Queens and probably all the way to Pennsylvania was ridiculous."
Aside from the blatant fear-mongering and over-hyping of this Three Stooges of terrorism, we question the revelation of all of the details of how they were caught. In the past, in so many instances, the government has been loathe to reveal even the most miniscule vagueries of terror investigations - refusing to even talk about all the myriad of plots that they had broken up, or about the details of those they did reveal.
In telling the American public about this foiled plot, we have to be sensitive to the need to protect sources and methods since we are dealing with the ongoing threat from al Qaeda -- and you'll appreciate that's why the President doesn't name the countries, the particular allies or the particulars of the sources and methods to glean the operational leads that led to the disruption of the plot.
Feb 9, 2006
But it's okay in this case to tell us that the informant was a twice convicted drug offender awaiting sentencing (pending cooperation with the feds), that he infiltrated the group, made several trips overseas, drove with the ringleader to the fuel tanks at night, made videos and did surveillance of the airport, etc etc. (More here).

Could it be that the White House realizes it has zero credibility and zero trust, and they have to reveal more an more details (thereby putting our nation at more and more risk) in order to keep drumming up support for their wars and occupations? Fear is the only way they know how to govern. The American people are no longer heeding the cries of "wolf" - at least without evidence. The worst part of this charade won't be revealed until we are faced with a real threat, and the nation rolls over from it's slumber, yawns, scratches it's balls, says "yeah whatever" and goes back to sleep.

In the meantime, if the United States government is afraid of guys like these, we're in worse trouble than any of us suspect. If this motley gang is seriously considered a "threat", than Bush is obviously failing miserably in his sworn job of protecting the nation. But we already knew that.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:23 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption

Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, June 3, 2007
This week in Freeperville
posted by Clyde
7:02 AM

Vapid vemon of the vitriolic

Praying for Presidunce Bush
Prayers for our dear president with grateful hearts for all he has done for our nation. He has sacrificed much of his health & happiness in doing so. (Link)

You want his health to improve? Take his bike away!

Rice - no war with Iran
Hmmm. Looks like a political decision was reached. Great. I should have just voted for Kerry, I guess... (Link)

You guessed right!

Why Fred Thompson?
I think there are a lot of people who think that he is the only true conservative, or conservatarian, who can win. (Link)

Conservatarian? Is George blogging at Free Republic?

Marine's discharge
PING! Was this the marine that the Eagles saw over on the Anti-War side during the Rally in D.C. on March 17th?
Procecute! Procecute! Procecute! (Link)

Procecute? Intelligence has no basement in Freeperville!

I almost soiled myself on the next one!

SecDef on war with Iran
Contrary to popular belief, Bill Gates did not invent the Internet or computers. Him and his associates created DOS. An awesome legacy. Dear Bill Gates, please debug DOS (now commonly known as Windows) and prove that you are perfect before you get back on your high horse and continue to torture us with your opinions. It ain't as if we have not given you enough money already. (Link)

It's BOB GATES you ignorant POS! It's like trying to match wits with an unarmed opponent.

Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Surge yields results
posted by Clyde
6:53 AM

Number of Unidentified Bodies Found in Baghdad Rose Sharply in May

The number of unidentified corpses discovered in Baghdad soared more than 70 percent during May, according to new statistics from the Iraqi Ministry of Interior, an indication that sectarian killings are rising sharply as militias return to the streets after lying low during the first few months of the troop "surge."

In May, 726 unidentified bodies were found in Baghdad, many bound and shot in the head or showing signs of torture and execution, compared with 411 during April, according to figures provided by a ministry official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to release the information.

The Bush administration and military have cited a decline in sectarian killings as proof that the troop escalation is working. And despite May's increase in corpses, the numbers remain far below the peak of sectarian executions last year. In July and August, for example, a total of 5,106 people died violent deaths in Baghdad alone, according to the United Nations, including 3,391 reported by the city's morgue.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush foreign policy jump starts new Cold War
posted by Clyde
6:49 AM

Putin threatens to target Europe with missiles

In an interview with the Globe and Mail, Russian President Vladimir Putin has threatened to target Europe with missiles, including potentially nuclear weapons, in a dramatic escalation of his Cold War-style showdown with the United States.

Mr. Putin, in an interview at his country residence outside Moscow, said he considers U.S. plans to build an eastern European anti-missile site to shoot down Iranian missiles a provocation aimed at Russia.

Asked what he might do to retaliate, he said he would return Russia to the Cold War status where missiles were aimed at European targets.

"It is obvious that if part of the strategic nuclear potential of the United States is located in Europe, and according to our military experts will be threatening us, we will have to respond," he said.

(Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, June 2, 2007
Family values vs Army regs
posted by Clyde
5:26 AM

Spc. fights Army to donate kidney to mother

A soldier from New Hampshire says the Army is standing in the way of lifesaving kidney donor surgery for his mother.

Army Spc. Frank Chapman, 27, is a match to his mother, Patricia Chapman, who suffers from kidney disease and is on dialysis three days a week. They are scheduled for transplant surgery June 13 in Florida, where Patricia Chapman lives.

Chapman, his wife and her two children are all packed up to move - he had sought a compassionate reassignment from the Army so they could care for Patricia, who lives in Dunnellon, Fla., after the surgery. But the plans are in limbo after the family learned last month that Army medical officials are denying permission for the surgery, which they say could lead to medical problems for Chapman down the road.

"How would you tell your mom two weeks before the surgery that, 'Oop, I can't give you a kidney,' " Chapman told KSWO-TV in Lawton.

(Link)

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Common sense at the DoD?
posted by Clyde
5:16 AM

Gates considers roots of terrorism

Declining to say whether the U.S. and its partners are winning the war on terror, Defense Secretary Robert Gates called Saturday for more focus on combating poverty and other underlying causes of extremism.

"I think we are still early in this contest," Gates said in a question-and-answer session with attendees of a conference on Asian security, an annual gathering that took on an unusual dimension with the participation of a senior Chinese general who offered a pointed defense of his country's military buildup.

In a speech to the gathering known as the Shangri-la Dialogue, Gates called on Asian nations to contribute more to the war on terrorism and to ensure that Afghanistan not be allowed to slip back into chaos. He touched only lightly on China, whose military buildup had been a central focus of previous conferences.

And while Gates mentioned the Iraq war and warned of security risks posed by the nuclear ambitions of North Korean and Iran, he focused more on broader themes of terrorism and U.S. commitments in Asia.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, June 1, 2007
Unpopular among the dead
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:00 PM

R.I.P. Barbara:

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

More Congressional Hearings: Chairman Nadler Announces Hearings Series: "The Constitution in Crisis: The State of Civil Liberties in America"
posted by Wally
9:50 AM

Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Subcommittee to Explore Administration Programs Threatening Americans' Liberties

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, Congressman Jerrold Nadler (NY-08), Chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, announced a series of hearings titled "The Constitution in Crisis: The State of Civil Liberties in America." In these hearings, the Subcommittee will examine the Bush Administration's policies, actions and programs that threaten Americans' fundamental constitutional rights and civil liberties and also hear proposals for potential legislative fixes.

The series will begin with a hearing on June 7, 2007, which will examine the National Security Agency's wiretapping program and the Administration's proposals for expanding it.

"This Congress must void the blank check the White House has enjoyed for the last six years," said Rep. Nadler. "The time for real accountability and meaningful oversight is now, and this Subcommittee will fulfill its constitutional duty to protect the fundamental freedoms of all Americans."

Topics to be covered by the hearings include:

· The National Security Agency's wiretapping program and proposed expansions;
· The erosion of Habeas Corpus through the Military Commissions Act;
· The sanctioning of torture through the Military Commissions Act and other government policies;
· The practice of "extraordinary rendition," or government sponsored kidnapping;
· PATRIOT Act threats to privacy rights, including the FBI's abuses of the National Security Letter authority and intrusions into Americans' "Freedom to Read";
· Government surveillance of First Amendment-protected activities; and
· The gutting of the Justice Department's Civil Rights and Voting Rights Divisions.

"Most importantly, we will carefully examine this White House's seeming disregard for the Constitution and the rule of law," added Rep. Nadler. "Secret, warrantless spying, the erosion of habeas corpus, the sanction of torture, and this Administration's contempt for the other two branches of government - these issues demand close scrutiny and congressional action."

Rep. Nadler has already introduced a number of important pieces of legislation in the 110th Congress to restore some of the basic civil liberties that the Bush Administration has stripped from the Constitution. Along with Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA-36), Rep. Nadler introduced H.R.1415, the Restoring the Constitution Act of 2007 along with H. R. 1416, the Habeas Corpus Restoration Act of 2007. Both bills would fix many of the problems contained in the Military Commissions Act.


What: House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, Oversight Hearing on the Constitutional Limitations on Domestic Surveillance

Who: Steven G. Bradbury, Assistant Attorney General, Office of General Counsel

Bruce Fein, former Assistant Deputy Attorney General

Jameel Jaffer, Director, National Security Project, American Civil Liberties Union

Lou Fisher, American Law Division, Library of Congress

When: Thursday, June 7, 2007 - 2:00 p.m.

Where: 2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Coming June 7 to a Congress near you

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tonight's the Night: Iraq's Leader Had Told Reporters U.S. Could Start Pullout By June 1
posted by Wally
9:39 AM

By E&P Staff

Published: May 31, 2007 4:30 PM ET

NEW YORK Last November 30, as the Iraq Study Group was about to release its report -- and talk of a U.S. escalation still a few weeks off -- the press gave a lot of weight to the words of Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki when he vowed that his country's forces would be able to assume security command by June 2007, which could allow the United States to start withdrawing its troops.

"I cannot answer on behalf of the U.S. administration but I can tell you that from our side our forces will be ready by June 2007," Maliki told ABC television after meeting President Bush in Amman, Jordan.

Maliki had replied to a question about whether U.S. troops could start withdrawing at that time.

As his promised deadline approached this month, the handover was as far from reality as ever and the U.S. suffered its highest rate of casualties in years.
Or, maybe not

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

So much for "Open Government" - or - You don't need to know what Cheney is up to
posted by Wally
7:56 AM

It took less than two weeks for the "Accountability Administration" to get started on closing the doors on the "open government" envisioned by the Founding Fathers. In Bush's second week in office, he set up Cheney's top secret energy task force. After 6 years of lawsuits and Freedom of Information Act requests, we still don't know what they did, what they talked about, or even know WHO was present on that (here's a hint - Bush is an oil man, Condi used to have an oil tanker named after her, and we all know about Dick). That's the M.O. by which they've run their administration ever since.

Now, in a move that should surprise no-one, we find out that the White House has been working behind the scenes to completely prevent the public from finding out who has been visiting the Vice President and others in the administration.
A newly disclosed effort to keep Vice President Dick Cheney's visitor records secret is the latest White House push to make sure the public doesn't learn who has been meeting with top officials in the Bush administration.
It's not that they don't want us to know what went on or what was discussed in the meetings - that might be justifiable in some cases - but they don't even want us to know WHO was in the meetings. They could be meeting with Osama bin Laden for all we know. What are they hiding?

Of course when Clinton was in office, they wouldn't hear of such secrecy. He got a blowjob, after all. It was important to dig through the visitor logs, the meetiung minutes, Hillary's underwear drawers - they were living in "our" house, after all. But now things are different, because instead of a sex scandal, we're merely talking about Jack Abramoff style corruption.
"The question it raises is 'what are these guys hiding?'" said Christopher Lehane, former special assistant counsel to President Clinton, now a Democratic consultant. "They can live with it because they've only got a year or so left, but it doesn't do a lot for public confidence in open government."

White House spokesman Tony Fratto said Thursday, "I can't comment on a case in litigation, and I can't speak to the decisions made by other administrations."
Oh puhlease - they are never at liberty to comment on anything, ever, for any reason, because it is, or was in the past, or might some day in the future, be under investigation. That is, of course, unless commenting on it is in their interest - then it's perfectly reasonable to do so.

What's worse, they are not only hiding this information from the public, they are actively destroying all documentation and evidence of their activities and meetings.

So what they are saying is it's perfectly okay for them to listen to our phone conversations, read our emails, go through our financial transactions and medical records, track our internet usage, and secretly search our homes when we're not there - without a warrant - but they don't even have to tell us who they are meeting or what they are doing as part of the job we are paying them to do? And it's okay for them to do it in the house that still, in spite of their feelings to the contrary, belongs to "We The People". Yeah, that's fair.

What are they hiding?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Another slap in the face....
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:51 AM

Can he get any more rude?

Bush to mother: Don't sell on eBay

Several mothers who have lost children at war in Iraq took part in a new talk show today on National Public Radio.

One of them, Elaine Johnson, recounted a meeting that she had with President Bush in which he gave her a presidential coin and told her and five other families: "Don't go sell it on eBay."

........

"My son was killed November 2, 2003,'' Johnson said. "After they had my son's memorial in Colorado Springs -- that's Fort Carson -- I was interviewed by the Gazette Newspaper, and that started it all.

"They said they had a mother or a person to ever lashed out at the president, criticize the president of being insensitive,'' she said. "So a couple of days after that they called me and said that President Bush would like to meet me. And I said well okay, only at his cost because I was not spending my money to meet him.''

Laddy-freaking-da

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:30 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

 

 

 Headlines & Comments

 
 True! by Daryl Cagle

See more TRUE cartoons by Daryl Cagle
 

Kansas City's own...
dubyaD40.com

Site Meter