Home

Columnists

Merchandise

Other Stuff

 

 Go Vote!


My site was nominated for Best Political Blog!
 

 Air America Radio

 Head-On Radio Network

 Search dubyaD40.com

Google


Search Web
Search dubyaD40.com

 Ads by The Google

 Take Action

 Advertisers

 Recent Posts

 Archives

 Today's Reason To Drink



 Want to link to us?


It's easy to do.  Right click on the image below and choose "Copy."  Then paste it on your site.


 

 
 Blogroll

 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 Today's Topics

 
Thursday, May 31, 2007
Fitz: If Libby didn't purjure and obstruct, it would be Cheney going to prison instead
posted by Wally
11:42 AM

Special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald has made it clearer than ever that he was hot on the trail of a coordinated campaign to out CIA agent Valerie Plame until that line of investigation was cut off by the repeated lies from Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

In Friday's eminently readable court filing, Fitzgerald quotes the Libby defense calling his prosecution "unwarranted, unjust, and motivated by politics." In responding to that charge, the special counsel evidently felt obliged to put Libby's crime in context. And that context is Dick Cheney.

Libby's lies, Fitzgerald wrote, "made impossible an accurate evaluation of the role that Mr. Libby and those with whom he worked played in the disclosure of information regarding Ms. Wilson's CIA employment and about the motivations for their actions."

The investigation, Fitzgerald writes, "was necessary to determine whether there was concerted action by any combination of the officials known to have disclosed the information about Ms. Plame to the media as anonymous sources, and also whether any of those who were involved acted at the direction of others. This was particularly important in light of Mr. Libby's statement to the FBI that he may have discussed Ms. Wilson's employment with reporters at the specific direction of the Vice President."
I wonder if Cheney threatened to take Scooter hunting if he didn't take the dive for him?

Scooter and Shooter

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

"I see here today is progress, significant progress"
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:43 AM

Gawd I hate this little twerp. He's just like McCain. Everything is so rosey over there.....You can walk down any street......They just LOVE us! Hey Joe, why do you have to make unannounced visits to Iraq? Scared?

Lieberman Confronted By Troops In Iraq: "When Are We Going To Get Out Of Here?"

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Spc. David Williams, 22, of Boston, Mass., had two note cards in his pocket Wednesday afternoon as he waited for Sen. Joseph Lieberman. Williams serves in the 82nd Airborne Division from Fort Bragg, N.C., the first of the five "surge" brigades to arrive in Iraq, and he was chosen to join the Independent from Connecticut for lunch at a U.S. field base in Baghdad.

The night before, 30 other soldiers crowded around him with questions for the senator.

He wrote them all down. At the top of his note card was the question he got from nearly every one of his fellow soldiers:

"When are we going to get out of here?"

More quotes:

"He looks just like me," he said. "I didn't want to come back. . . . We're waiting to get blown up."

"I don't want him to snap his fingers to get things fixed," Williams said, referring to Lieberman. "But he has influence."

"We're not making any progress,"

"It just seems like we drive around and wait to get shot at."

But as he waited two chairs down from where Lieberman would sit, Hedin said he'd never voice his true feelings to the senator.

"I think I'd be a private if I did," he joked. "It's just more troops, more targets."

"It's like everything else in this war,"

"It hasn't changed."
As for Lieberman:

"Overall, I would say what I see here today is progress, significant progress from the last time I was here in December. And if you can see progress in war that means you're headed in the right direction."

"I think it's important we don't lose our will," he said. "To pull out would be a disaster."
Progress in a picture:

Sucks!

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Take another hit Junior
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
9:48 AM

On Iraq, Bush Says Public is With Him

WASHINGTON - Confronted with strong opposition to his Iraq policies, President George W. Bush decides to interpret public opinion his own way. Actually, he says, people agree with him.

Democrats view the November elections that gave them control of Congress as a mandate to bring U.S. troops home from Iraq. They are backed by evidence; election exit poll surveys by The Associated Press and television networks found 55 percent saying the U.S. should withdraw some or all of its troops from Iraq.

Bush says Democrats have it all wrong: the public does not want the troops pulled out - they want to give the military more support in its mission.

"Last November, the American people said they were frustrated and wanted a change in our strategy in Iraq," he said April 24, ahead of a veto showdown with congressional Democrats over their desire to legislation a troop withdrawal timeline. "I listened. Today, General David Petraeus is carrying out a strategy that is dramatically different from our previous course."

Mental

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

The Surge in Troop Levels and Blood Letting - May is Deadliest Month Since Nov. 2004
posted by Wally
7:03 AM

Two more US soldiers have been killed in Iraq, the military announced Thursday, confirming that May had become the deadliest month for American forces in two-and-a-half years.

The soldiers were killed Wednesday when a roadside bomb hit their foot patrol and brought US casualties for the month to 116, the most since November 2004, when marines fought a fierce battle to retake the city of Fallujah.
great progress
Speaking of Fallujah, how are things going there 2 1/2 years later?
A suicide bomber hit a police recruiting center in Fallujah on Thursday, killing at least 25 people and wounding 50, police said. U.S. forces backed by helicopter gunships clashed with suspected al-Qaida gunmen in western Baghdad in an engagement that lasted several hours.
Not So Good
It's not just the troops suffering increasing losses. A truly free and democratic society - the "shining example" that Bush says he is trying to create in Iraq - depends on the free and open exchange of news and information. This is something that tends to be more difficult when your journalists keep getting killed.
The deaths of three more Iraqi journalists were reported on Wednesday, bringing the monthly total to nine and equalling the worst month on record for reporters in the Iraq war.

Iraq is already the deadliest conflict in 25 years for journalists. RSF puts the total death toll of journalists and media assistants in Iraq at 177, while CPJ says 104 journalists have been killed. The figures do not include the latest deaths.
No News is Not Always Good News
Don't let all the bad news get you down though. According to Bush, speaking at (of course) a GOP fundraiser, things are going just honky dory in Iraq, and "there has been pretty startling progress". I have to admit, he is partly right. It's pretty frikking startling.

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

He won't resign. Bush won't fire him. Maybe they'll disbar Gonzales.
posted by Wally
6:19 AM

Like they did to Clinton for lying about Monica.
While the political world obsesses over whether Attorney General Alberto Gonzales can survive the outcry over the politically motivated dismissal of eight United States Attorneys, the legal academy has been debating a different aspect of the fallout:

Could a case be made that the chief law-enforcement officer of the United States should be disbarred?

(snip)

Bar-association rules, which are established by state associations-Mr. Gonzales is licensed in the state of Texas in addition to being admitted to the Supreme Court bar-typically forbid "conduct that involves deceit, fraud or misrepresentation." There are also various means of censuring lawyers for bad behavior that fall short of disbarment, such as a public reprimand.

"Lawyers are not allowed to lie," said Nancy Rapoport, an ethics expert and the former dean of the University of Houston Law Center. "That one, everyone agrees on."
It all comes down to how his testimony is interpreted, and what other information comes available. How many times do you have to say "I don't recall" under oath before it becomes obvious that you're either a liar and perjurer, or severely brain damaged. Either way, you are not qualified to be attorney general.

Hell, at some point (I think "74" times is beyond that point), you're practically asking to be kicked out of not only the Bar Association, but whatever hole in the wall dive-bar you happen to be sitting in (not that any of the dubyaD40.com crew would know about being kicked out of a bar, but...).

And Stay Out!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, May 30, 2007
Humpday Humor
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
3:36 PM

George W. Bush and a secret service agent are taking a stroll when they come upon a little girl carrying a basket with a blanket over it. Curious, Bush asks the girl, "What's in the basket?"

She replies, "New baby kittens," and she opens the basket to show him.

"How nice," says Bush. "What kind are they?" The little girl says, "Republicans."

Bush smiles, pats the little girl on the head and continues on.

Three weeks later, Bush is taking another stroll, this time with Karl Rove. They see the little girl again with the same basket. Bush says, "Watch this, Karl; it's really cute." They approach the little girl.

Bush greets the little girl and asks how the kittens are doing, and she says, "Fine."

Then, smirking, he nudges Rove with his elbow and asks the little girl, "And can you tell us what kind of kittens they are?"

She replies, "Democrats."

Abashed, Bush says, "But three weeks ago you said they were Republicans!"

"I know," she says. "But now their eyes are open."

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

An appropriate poster
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:42 PM

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Peace!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:58 PM

Norway is most peaceful country: study

Norway is the most peaceful country in the world and Iraq the least, according to a study launched.

The Global Peace Index, published a week before a Group of Eight (G8) summit in Germany, rates 121 countries from Algeria to Zimbabwe on factors including levels of violence, organised crime and military expenditure.

While most European countries including Britain rank in the top, more peaceful, half of the league table, the United States is nearer the bottom in 96th place, while Russia is fifth from last on 118th.

The index is backed by international figures including the Dalai Lama, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, former US president Jimmy Carter and US economist Joseph Stiglitz, all winners of the Nobel peace prize. It is also supported by Queen Noor of Jordan.

Notables:

1 - Norway
2 - New Zealand
3 - Denmark
4 - Ireland
5 - Japan

.....

96 - U.S.A.
97 - Iran
121 - Iraq

We're 96! We're 96!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush actually being honest:
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:11 AM

Not that it's a good thing:

Bush envisions U.S. presence in Iraq like S.Korea

President George W. Bush would like to see a lengthy U.S. troop presence in Iraq like the one in South Korea to provide stability but not in a frontline combat role, the White House said on Wednesday.

The United States has had thousands of U.S. troops in South Korea to guard against a North Korean invasion for 50 years.

Democrats in control of the U.S. Congress have been pressing Bush to agree to a timetable for pulling troops from Iraq, an idea firmly opposed by the president.

White House spokesman Tony Snow said Bush would like to see a U.S. role in Iraq ultimately similar to that in South Korea.

50 years?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Meet the new boss....same as the old boss
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:35 AM

Yeah, he might me a "little" better than Wolfie, but he's still a Bushie:

Bush taps Zoellick for World Bank

President Bush today plans to name Robert Zoellick, a former U.S. trade negotiator and career diplomat, for the presidency of the World Bank.

Zoellick will become Bush's nominee to replace Paul Wolfowitz, the former deputy secretary of defense who became World Bank president in 2005 only to make a personnel decision that ultimately would result in his withdrawal under a cloud this summer: Wolfowitz moved girlfriend Shaha Riza from a job inside the bank to a higher-paying bank-financed role at the State Department to avert conflict in his new post.

....

Wolfowitz, as one of the architects of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq at the Defense Department, had entered the World Bank facing animosity from European leaders who opposed the war. Zoelleck, who also was among the foreign policy advisers whom Bush brought to office with him in 2001, is not viewed as representing as much of a hardliner as the neo-conservative Wolfowitz is regarded.

Still a Puke
From Wikipedia:

In a January 2000 Foreign Affairs essay entitled "Campaign 2000: A Republican Foreign Policy," he was one of the first of those now associated with Bush's foreign policy to invoke the notion of "evil," writing: "[T]here is still evil in the world - people who hate America and the ideas for which it stands. Today, we face enemies who are hard at work to develop nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, along with the missiles to deliver them. The United States must remain vigilant and have the strength to defeat its enemies. People driven by enmity or by a need to dominate will not respond to reason or goodwill. They will manipulate civilized rules for uncivilized ends." The same essay praises the "idealism" of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. Two years earlier, Zoellick was one of the signatories (who also included Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Elliott Abrams, Zalmay Khalilzad, John R. Bolton, Richard Armitage, and Bill Kristol) of a January 26, 1998 letter to President Bill Clinton drafted by the Project for the New American Century calling for "removing Saddam [Hussein]'s regime from power."
He sounds like a Dick Cheney Neo-Con to me.

UPDATE (Thx Jenna!): It seems our nominee to head the World Bank is a former Enron board member. Yup, Enron. This should end well.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
6:39 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to add your caption.

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, May 29, 2007
What color is the sky in Bush's "bizarro-world"?
posted by Wally
12:29 PM

Analysis: Bush looks at public opinion on Iraq and declares it supports his decisions

It's one thing to be handed reams of conflicting and contradictory information and come to the exactly incorrect conclution from it, especially if one side of it is blatantly factually incorrect, and intentionally misleading. It's quite another to be told "you're an asshat and an idiot" and interpret that to mean that they agree with you and think you're doing a swell job. In George W. Bush's "opposite world", however, this is the norm.
Confronted with strong opposition to his Iraq policies, President Bush decides to interpret public opinion his own way. Actually, he says, people agree with him.

"Last November, the American people said they were frustrated and wanted a change in our strategy in Iraq," he said April 24, ahead of a veto showdown with congressional Democrats over their desire to legislation a troop withdrawal timeline. "I listened. Today, General David Petraeus is carrying out a strategy that is dramatically different from our previous course."
In Bush-world, increasing troop levels to what they were last year is somehow "a strategy that is dramatically different from our previous course."
"I recognize there are a handful there, or some, who just say, 'Get out, you know, it's just not worth it. Let's just leave.' I strongly disagree with that attitude. Most Americans do as well."

In fact, polls show Americans do not disagree, and that leaving - not winning - is their main goal.
Facts have never been Bush's strong suit, especially when they don't support his ideology. That might be why he doesn't go for all that "science" stuff. Twisting the truth, ignoring factual information, and outright lying are his stock in trade. But standing before the American people and the world and holding a straight face while saying "Red is blue, black is white, up is down" - that's over the top even for George. When you tell people that they don't know what their own opinions mean, even ditto-head morans take offense.

2+2=43

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Brother can you spare a half million?
posted by Wally
7:09 AM

The U.S. government recorded a $1.3 trillion loss last year, far more than the official $248 billion deficit, when corporate-style accounting standards are used, an analysis shows.

"We're on an unsustainable path and doing a great disservice to future generations," said Chris Chocola, a former Republican member of Congress from Indiana and corporate chief executive who is pushing for more accurate accounting. Modern method requires that corporations and state and local governments count expenses immediately when a transaction occurs, even if the payment will be made later.

The federal government does not follow the rule, so promises for Social Security and Medicare don't show up when the government reports its financial condition.

Taxpayers are on the hook for $59.1 trillion in liabilities, a 2.3 percent increase from 2006. That amount is equal to $516,347 for every U.S. household. By comparison, U.S. households owe an average of $112,043 for mortgages, car loans, credit cards and all other debt combined.

Fiscal Responsibility

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

5 years later - Homeland Security (lack of) Progress Report
posted by Wally
6:33 AM

Who's protecting the homeland? Who's looking after the critical infrastructure in this country and defending it from "terrorists"?

Who knows?

It looks like a bunch of untrained, minimum wage earning rent-a-cops that were hired with no background checks to me.
The security guard industry found itself involuntarily transformed after September 2001, from an army of "rent-a-cops" to protectors of the homeland. Yet, many security officers are paid little more than restaurant cooks or janitors.

(snip)

Congressional investigators reported last year that 89 private guards working at two military bases had histories that included assault, larceny, possession and use of controlled substances and forgery. The Army says it has purged guards with criminal histories from its bases.

(snip)

Bergendahl (a $19,000 a year private security guard at a skyscraper in Los Angeles) said his training usually consists of a real estate manager reading security measures to him every few months. His building rarely has evacuation drills. Management's advice? "Keep your coat buttoned. Keep your shoes shiny," Bergendahl said.
Shiny shoes will somehow protect us all from airplanes and suitcase bombs.

Feel safer?

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, May 28, 2007
Memorial Day by Michelle Keim
posted by Clyde
8:28 AM

As we stand here looking
At the flags upon these graves
Know these flags represent
A few of the true American brave

They fought for their Country
As man has through all of time
Except that these soldiers lying here
Fought for your country and mine

As we all are gathered here
To pay them our respect
Let's pass this word to others
It's what they would expect

I'm sure that they would do it
If it were me or you
To show we did not die in vein
But for the red, white and blue.

Let's pass on to our children
And to those who never knew
What these soldiers died for
It's the least we can do

Let's not forget their families
Great pain they had to bear
Losing a son, father or husband
They need to know we still care

No matter which war was fought
On the day that they died
I stand here looking at these flags
Filled with American pride.

So as the bugler plays out Taps
With its sweet and eerie sound
Pray for these soldiers lying here
In this sacred, hallowed ground.

Take home with you a sense of pride
You were here Memorial Day.
Celebrating the way Americans should
On this solemnest of days.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, May 27, 2007
This week's headlines - Memorial Day and war casualties
posted by Clyde
7:08 AM

ABC - U.S. Deaths Near Grim Memorial Day Mark

CBS - 100 U.S. Troops Killed In Deadly May

CNN - U.S. toll in Iraq for May surpasses 100

MSNBC - Nearly 1,000 soldiers killed in Iraq in past year

And from the Fairly Unbalanced

Faux News - Is Iran Hiding Something?

NO BIAS HERE - move along!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

This week in Freeperville
posted by Clyde
6:06 AM

Idiotic idioms from the imbecilic

Praying for PresiDunce Bush

Father, I pray that you will break that spirt of stubborness in George W. Bush, which the Bible says is as the sin of idolatry, and help him to become a man who is willing to listen to wise counsel and be humble enough to repent, i.e. change his mind when it is in the best interest of this nation and it's people. (Link)

After 6 years of pushing Bush as being the next coming of Christ you start whining about idolatry? Moran

Candidates repudiate the congress that tried to save Terri Schiavo

I thought Terri was brain dead. Completely brain dead and unresponsive. I read a thread here and linked to a couple sites, and found that wasn't the case at all. I had no idea whhile this was prominent in the news. (Link)

Being completely brain dead is a must for Freeping!

Tony Snow's Press Briefing

Amazing I hate the media cause they can’t do their job, then I want them to do their job and then... they once again fall short. (Link)

See what I mean!

Gonzo-gate

President Bush is one of our greatest President ever, please take your lies to a left wing lunatic site, they will love you for it. (Link)

Love ya!

Liberals Attack Free Speech

These overgrown hippies want to ban everything from cigiretts to french fries. (Link)

No just Freedom Fries thank you very much.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, May 26, 2007
Bush diplomacy at work again
posted by Clyde
6:26 AM

Pentagon issues blunt warning to China

The Pentagon is warning China in blunt language that despite Beijing's massive military buildup, it lacks the power for a successful attack against rival Taiwan.

The annual report on China's military, released Friday, is likely to add to rising tension between Washington and Beijing at a time when U.S. lawmakers are considering bills that would punish China for what they contend are predatory trade practices.

The report was released on the day the largest high-level Chinese delegation ever to visit the United States left Washington after economic meetings with frustrated lawmakers and with senior Bush administration officials yielded few results.

In the report, the Defense Department explicitly describes what would happen if China should attack Taiwan, the self-governing democratic island that Beijing claims as its own. It says China does not yet have "the military capability to accomplish with confidence its political objectives on the island, particularly when confronted with the prospect of U.S. intervention."

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Can the draft be far behind?
posted by Clyde
6:10 AM

Some recruits to get larger bonuses starting May 29

The Army has increased the ceiling for some enlistment bonuses, while offering special seasonal bonuses of up to $15,000 for recruits who ship to basic training on short notice.

Changes to the Enlistment Bonus program for the active component take effect May 29 and apply to the inventory of bonus specialties announced May 11.

Standard enlistment bonuses are available to qualified applicants with no military service or fewer than 180 days of active federal service, and who score in the top 50 percent of the armed forces entrance exam.

Under the May 24 changes, the total bonus amount for two-year enlistments increased from $6,000 to $15,000, and for a three-year enlistment from $10,000 to $25,000.

(Link)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, May 25, 2007
A Sign From the Heavens - Bush says "I stand by Gonzo" while sparrow makes editorial comment by crapping on him
posted by Wally
12:35 PM

Bush keeps saying that he listens to God. Well George, were you listening to this?
Giving one of his rare presidential press conferences since becoming the US leader in 2000, Bush was busy defending the beleagured US attorney general, Alberto Gonzales, when the avian heckler swooped by to deliver its whiter than white verdict.

The bird is yet to be formally identified, some say it was a pigeon, others, a sparrow, but its contribution to the proceedings was brief and to the point.
Guardian
Actually, according to ABC's Ann Compton, the bird shit on him as he was saying "I've got confidence in Al Gonzales doin' the job." If that's not a sign from above....

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

How they voted - for the record.
posted by Wally
10:40 AM

Here's the list of all the Senators up for re-election in 2008, and how they voted on the Iraq Occupation supplemental spending bill yesterday:

In favor:
Republicans:
Alexander (TN), Allard (CO), Chambliss (GA), Cochran (MS), Collins (ME), Cornyn (TX), Craig (ID), Dole (NC), Domenici (NM), Graham (SC), Hagel (NE), Inhofe (OK), McConnell (KY), Roberts (KS), Smith (OR), Stevens (AK), Sununu (NH), Warner (VA)

Democrats:
Biden (DE), Durbin (IL), Harkin (IA), Landrieu (LA), Lautenburg (NJ), Levin (MI), Pryor (AR), Reed (RI), Rockefeller (WV)


Opposed:
Rebublican: Enzi (WY)
Democrat: Kerry (MA)


Didn't Vote
Republican: Coleman (MN)
Democrat: Johnson (SD) (bedridden)


This list will come in handy in 2008.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Does it really matter?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:56 AM

Ya right. When they stand up, we stand down, blah blah blah.

Bush: 'US would leave if Iraq asks'
May 24th, 2007

Washington - US President George W Bush, who has warned that a hasty US pullout from Iraq would be catastrophic, said on Thursday that US forces would leave if the fledgling Baghdad government asked them to.

"We are there at the invitation of the Iraqi government. This is a sovereign nation," he said at a White House press conference.

"If they were to say 'leave', we would leave."
Hey President Pissypants! Don't you remember this? We do:

Iraqi Bill Demands U.S. Troops Withdraw
May 10th, 2007

BAGHDAD (AP) - A majority of Iraqi lawmakers have endorsed a bill calling for a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign troops and demanding a freeze on the number of foreign troops already in the country, lawmakers said Thursday.

The legislation was being debated even as U.S. lawmakers were locked in a dispute with the White House over their call to start reducing the size of the U.S. force here in the coming months.

The Iraqi bill, drafted by a parliamentary bloc loyal to anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, was signed by 144 members of the 275-member house, according to Nassar al-Rubaie, the leader of the Sadrist bloc.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

T R A I T O R S !
posted by Wally
7:45 AM

The Democratic Leadership just gave a big F-U to the troops, to the American people, and to their constitutional responsibilities to uphold their end of the "Balance of Power".

The Democratic Leadership just gave King Bush everything he asked for and then some, including a crown and scepter.


They gave him his unrestricted blood money.
They gave it to him with no timelines.
They gave it to him with no benchmarks.
They gave it to him with no "troop readiness" requirements.
They gave it to him with no restrictions.
They gave it to him with no accountability or responsibility.
They gave his Iraq occupation legitimacy.
They gave him credibility by going along with his straw man of "cutting off funding for the troops" bullshit.
They gave him strength by cowering before him and caving to his tantrum.

The only thing they didn't give to him was a fucking blowjob, because then they'd have grounds for impeachment. And impeachment is "off the table."

Traitors and cowards

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friggin' Democrats
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:26 AM

Repeat after me....

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:32 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of the boy king getting cozy with Chinese Vice Premier Wu Yi while Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson watches.


Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, May 24, 2007
Bush / Broken Record* - The next few months will be a critical time
posted by Wally
10:49 AM

This morning King George celebrated his victory over the Democratically controlled Congress, and their apparent upcoming coronation of him as King - seeing as they've abdicated all authority, responsibility, and governing power to him - by pulling another "Friedman", announcing that the next few months were the critical ones in Iraq. Which is the exact same thing we've been hearing from he and his royal family for the past 4 years. The same "critical few months" over and over and over. It's like "Groundhog Day", but with explosions and gunfire and dead and mutilated bodies and blood and gore and violence and fear.... We're watching an extremely violent, bloody, and expensive remake of "The Money Pit", with the phrase "two weeks" replaced by "next few months".
Bush told a news conference that the last troops in a 30,000-troop buildup should be in place by mid-June, and said "This summer is going to be a critical time for the new strategy."

"We expect heavy fighting in the weeks and months" ahead, Bush said. He said more American and Iraqi casualties should be expected.
What does he care about casualties, they're not his kids. Just a bunch more "commas".

Two Weeks

* (if you don't know what a "broken record" is, ask your parents)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

We will now OWN this WAR.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:16 AM

In general, this bill makes us sick to the stomach. From giving Bush a blank check like he wanted to turning their back on the will of the American people. I can't believe, in less than 6 months time, the Democratic majority has already caved in to one of the most unpopular presidents of all time. Not to mention, he may be the second worst hated man in the world's history. Nancy? Harry? Where is that "accountability" you so proudly wore as a badge?

To make things worse, read this:

VOTE ALERT: Dick Cheney Dems Plan to Hide Votes On Iraq TODAY

Today is the day House Democrats are expected to vote on Iraq - except, news out of Washington this morning says the leadership has come up with a nifty little trick to try to prevent the public from seeing who voted for giving Bush a blank check, and who voted against it. If you thought Democrats were behaving like cowards by caving into a President at a three-decade low in presidential polling and giving him the very blank check they explicitly promised not to give him during the 2006 election, you ain't seen nothing yet. We are watching the rise of the Dick Cheney Democrats - that is, the rise of Democrats who endorse governing in secret and hiding the public's business from the public itself.

Here's how it is expected to work today in a process only Dick Cheney could love (though you never know - it could change at the last minute). Every bill comes to the House floor with what is known as a "rule" that sets the terms of the debate over the legislation in question. House members first vote to approve this parliamentary rule, and then vote on the legislation. Today, however, Democrats are planning to essentially include the Iraq blank check bill IN the rule itself, by making sure the underlying bill the rule brings to the floor includes no timelines for withdrawal, and that the rule only allows amendments that fund the war with no restrictions - blank check amendments that House Democratic leaders know Republicans will have the votes to pass.

Puke
Thanks alot Nancy and Harry!!!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

KEITH OLBERMANN - THE PRESIDENT HAS FAILED - CONGRESS HAS FAILED
posted by Wally
7:45 AM

K.O. tees off on Bush and the Democratic leadership over the Iraq occupation "compromise" in a special comment. Click the image to watch.



......The Democratic majority has agreed to finance the deaths of Americans in a war that has only reduced the security of Americans. The Democratic leadership has given Mr. Bush all that he wanted, with the only caveat being not merely meaningless symbolism about benchmarks for the Iraqi government, but OPTIONAL meaningless symbolism about benchmarks for the Iraqi government.

The Democratic leadership has in sum claimed a compromise with the administration where the only things truly compromised are the trust of the voters, the ethics of the Democrats, and the lives of our brave and doomed friends and family in Iraq.

You, the men and women elected with the simplest of directions - stop the war - have traded your strength, your bargaining position, and the uniform support of those who elected you for a handful of magic beans.

You may trot out ever political cliche from the soft soap inside the beltway dictionary of boilerplate sound bites about how this is the beginning of the end of Mr. Bush's carte blanche in Iraq, about how this is a first step. Well Senator Reid, the only end at it's beginning is our collective hope that you and your colleagues would do what is right, what is essential, what you were each elected, or re-elected to do, because this "first step" is a step right off a cliff.

(Much much more in the video)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Priorities
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:36 AM

Bush Threatens Veto of Gas Gouging Bill

WASHINGTON (Dow Jones) -- President Bush is likely to veto legislation that would create hefty fines and criminal penalties for gasoline price-gouging, the White House said Wednesday.

The threat came as the House prepared to vote on a Democratic plan aimed at battling rising gasoline prices by requiring the Federal Trade Commission to define "price gouging." The bill would create fines and criminal penalties, including jail time, for industry executives found guilty of gouging.

The White House, in a formal statement of administration policy, said the legislation amounted to price controls that would hinder oil companies and retailers from responding to market signals, potentially worsening fuel shortages.

"Gasoline price controls are an old -- and failed -- policy choice that will exacerbate shortages and increase fuel hoarding after natural disasters, denying fuel to people when they most need it," the White House said, adding that Bush's senior advisers would recommend a veto of the House bill or any similar legislation that makes it to his desk.

$3.36

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Mary Cheney gives birth to Anakin Skywalker
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
3:23 PM

Get it?

Mary Cheney's baby is born

Vice President Cheney's daughter Mary gave birth today to Samuel David Cheney.

Under Virginia law, Mary's partner of 15 years, Heather Poe, "will have no legal relationship with her child. She can't adopt as a second parent. She won't have her name on the birth certificate." President Bush will still not say whether or not he supports gay adoption.

Death Star

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Greg Palast: Goodling/Sampson Obstruction of Justice evidence?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
3:09 PM

Goodling/Sampson Obstruction of Justice evidence?

BBC Television's Newsnight has 500 "missing" Rove office emails including a series of self-incriminating notes which provide "the keys to the kingdom" behind the prosecutor firings.

In the opening to today's testimony before Congress, Monica Goodling, former Department of Justice White House Liaison, testified that Deputy Attorney General Kyle Sampson lied. At issue was, says Goodling, Sampson's denial "that he had some knowledge of allegations that Tim Griffin had been involved in vote 'caging' during the work on the President's 2004 campaign."

What is 'caging'? Why is it so important that it lead Goodling's testimony? Why is Tim Griffin's involvement kept secret? And what are 'the allegations'?

Lot More

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

U.S. Navy sends carriers near Iran - this should end well
posted by Wally
11:54 AM

The U.S. Navy staged its latest show of military force off the Iranian coastline on Wednesday, sending two aircraft carriers and landing ships packed with 17,000 U.S. Marines and sailors to carry out unannounced exercises in the Persian Gulf.


The carrier strike groups led by the USS John C. Stennis and USS Nimitz were joined by the amphibious assault ship USS Bonhomme Richard and its own strike group, which includes landing ships carrying members of the 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit.

The Navy said nine U.S. warships passed through the narrow Strait of Hormuz on Wednesday. Merchant ships passing through the busy strait carry two-fifths of the world's oil exports.

Aircraft aboard the two carriers and the Bonhomme Richard were to conduct air training while the ships ran submarine, mine and other exercises.


War starts with Dubya

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Goodling Says Deputy Attorney General Misled Congress
posted by Wally
11:44 AM

Deputy Attorney General Paul J. McNulty knew about extensive White House involvement in the firings of U.S. attorneys before he provided inaccurate information about the issue to Congress, a former senior Justice aide testified this morning.

Monica M. Goodling, speaking publicly for the first time about her role in the prosecutor firings, also said McNulty urged her not to attend a private Senate briefing, saying that her status as White House liaison would raise questions among lawmakers about possible White House involvement in the dismissals.

"I believe the deputy was not fully candid about his knowledge of the White House's involvement," Goodling testified at the House Judiciary Committee, which has granted her immunity from prosecution in exchange for her testimony.

Under Oath

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Comblicker to Homewrecker
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
11:17 AM

Wolfowitz splits from girlfriend

Washington, May 23 : Outgoing World Bank president Paul Wolfowitz has not only lost his job, but his girlfriend, too.

Wolfowitz was asked to resign from the World Bank over a controversial pay and promotion package that he had arranged for his brunette girlfriend, Shaha Ali Riza.

Sources were quoted by the New York Post as saying that Riza, a brilliant feminist with a promising diplomatic career, was upset by all the publicity and the implication that she was getting ahead with the help of a powerful man.

"She was furious about the embarrassment," one source was quoted, as saying.

Does he have a blonde girlfriend?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Why didn't anyone think of this before?
posted by Wally
10:00 AM

This would have been a great suggestion before the war. I'm sure Bush would have been receptive to it, if only someone, anyone, had thought of it.

Bush may turn to UN in search for Iraq solution
If troop surge fails, strategy is to involve other nations under UN umbrella

The Bush administration is developing plans to "internationalise" the Iraq crisis, including an expanded role for the United Nations, as a way of reducing overall US responsibility for Iraq's future and limiting domestic political fallout from the war as the 2008 election season approaches.

(snip)

Four years after bypassing a hostile security council, the Bush administration is expected to take the Iraq question back to the UN at the annual opening of the general assembly in September.

"We foresee a very significant role for the UN and its agencies. The UN has great expertise that is badly needed in Iraq," a senior US diplomat said at the weekend. The World Bank and IMF would also be asked to do more, he said.
Isn't that exactly what every sane person was saying back in 2002 when Bush was doing things like bugging phones in efforts to strong-arm the U.N. into going along with, and thereby legitimizing his unilateral invasion of Iraq? Weren't the voices on the left, and the center, telling him that without UN approval, his war was illegal?

Instead of paying attention, he called those of us who weren't "with him" traitors and terrorist appeasers. When the United Nations balked at his war, he said they were "irrelevant", and without waiting for a vote (destined to fail) on a second resolution giving international approval, he ordered inspectors and diplomats out of Iraq and issued a final warning. Thus began Bush's war.

Now that it's working out exactly as predicted - a failure on a massive scale - Bush is flip-flopping and crying to the U.N. for help. He's even reaching out to France!

Times sure have changed since the old days when John Bolton was the ambassador to the U.N., holding such diplomatic beliefs about the organization to which he was the U.S. representative as "There is no such thing as the United Nations....If the U.N. secretary building in New York lost 10 stories, it wouldn't make a bit of difference." (he actually said that).

The question now is, will the U.N. agree to help, or will they tell us the same thing Colin Powell warned Bush about before the invasion "you broke it, you bought it".


Side note: the article also mentions that a former White House official who is familiar with administration thinking, predicted Mr Bush would ask Congress to agree to another "Friedman", extending the surge for 6 more months after Gen Petraeus presents his "progress report" in early September. Is anyone surprised?

Permalink ::