Home

Columnists

Merchandise

Other Stuff

 

 Air America Radio

 Head-On Radio Network

 Search dubyaD40.com

Google


Search Web
Search dubyaD40.com

 Ads by The Google

 Take Action

 Recent Posts

 Archives

 Today's Reason To Drink



 Want to link to us?


It's easy to do.  Right click on the image below and choose "Copy."  Then paste it on your site.


 

 

 Blogroll

 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 Today's Topics

 
Monday, April 30, 2007
Your momma's so fat....
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:38 AM

And this fat f*ck can make fun of John Edwards' $400 dollar haircut:

April 30, 2007 -- RADIO host Rush Limbaugh is far from conservative when it comes to his big appetite. The Post's Braden Keil reports that Limbaugh and a female companion lived large at Kobe Club last Thursday night, devouring bacon with truffles, Japanese strip steak, Kobe beef cheek ravioli, a large seafood platter, a combo of American, Australian and Japanese wagyu steaks and several "side" dishes. After finishing their $700 feast, Limbaugh left the server a $1,000 tip. On a previous night, Limbaugh and another female friend were spotted by patrons sharing a $4,000 bottle of wine at '21.'

Oxyboy

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush already threatening to veto the NEXT Iraq war spending bill because it might have "Benchmarks" for progress in Iraq
posted by Wally
7:52 AM

Why does Bush hate progress?

He hasn't even vetoed the first Iraq occupation emergency spending bill that the Dems will be handing to him tomorrow - the 4th anniversary of "Mission Accomplished Day" - but Bush is already threatening to veto the next one too. He refuses to accept any qualifications on the money, or any oversight whatsoever - just a completely blank check to do whatever the hell he wants. He is threatening to veto the next bill if it even has "benchmarks" that have to be met showing progress in Iraq in order to spend the money.
President George W. Bush will not sign any war spending bill that penalizes Iraq's government for failing to make progress, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Sunday, a fresh warning to the U.S. Congress about challenging him.

"To begin now to tie our own hands - and to say 'We must do this if they don't do that' - doesn't allow us the flexibility and creativity that we need to move this forward," Rice said.
Then she went on to say, apparently oblivious to the contradiction inherent in her statements:
"The United States is paying in blood and treasures," Rice acknowledged. "The Iraqi leadership is being told, and I think they understand, that the kind of Iraq that there is going to be is up to them. We can't give them a united Iraq."
That's precisely why the Dems are insisting on stipulations for getting the money - to make damn sure they know that it "is up to them" and so we can stop "paying in blood and treasures." To make sure that the money - LOTS of money - is getting results and making progress, and not just being pissed away.
"The benchmarks - the Iraqis agreed to it, the president agreed it," said Democratic Rep. John Murtha, who heads a House subcommittee that controls defense spending. "We're saying to them, 'Well, let's put some teeth into the benchmarks.'"
But Bush doesn't want teeth in it. He doesn't believe in accountability or responsibility or oversight. He just wants to be left alone to play with his toys, and when he breaks them, he wants someone else to pay for new ones. In this case, that payment is in the form of American tax dollars, and the blood of American and Iraqi soldiers and Iraqi civilians.

Let him keep vetoeing the war spending bills. Maybe our soldiers can come back home when the money runs out.

Paying For Results

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:34 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya listening to the pledge of allegiance with his hand over his.... heart?

Permalink :: 11 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, April 29, 2007
This week's headlines - Former CIA Director George Tenet
posted by Clyde
7:13 AM

ABC - Former CIA Director Says There Was Never Any Debate on Iraq

CBS - Tenet: "Slam Dunk" Comment Misused

CNN - 'Slam dunk' comment on Iraq distorted, Tenet says

MSNBC - Tenet: White House eyed Iraq long before 9/11

And from the Fairly Unbalanced

Faux News - Former CIA Director George Tenet: Al Qaeda is in America

ABSOLUTELY NO BIAS HERE - move along!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

This week in Freeperville
posted by Clyde
6:23 AM

The mental midgets of mendacity

Praying for PresiDunce Bush

Thank You Father for the faithfulness and humility of Your Servants that bring our beloved President,Mrs. Bush, our brave Troops and this great country to your Throne everyday! In Jesus Name, Amen. (Link)

"beloved" by whom - Barney?

Hooker-gate

I am going to go ahead and assume that because CNN isn't screaming at the top of their lungs that this guy is either Conservative or Republican that he must be a liberal or demoncat, so therefore we won't hear much of him. Just wait till the first guy who is a Republican gets busted though....they will act like there were orgies in the West Wing or something.

Just like they did with Gannon-gate?

Tenet: Al Qaeda is in America

They are hear as illigal's and we need them to do the work Americans won't do, blow things up, kill little children, burn buildings down. Oh wait we do have Americans to do this, the ACLU and their pedophile supporters, Rioters in East LA. Okay that the one blow things up. Besides this is the tell in his statment; "I do know one thing in my gut," He FEELS it in his gut, well show me the proof, if they were here they would be blowing things up, it is what they do. (Link)

Illigal? Jethro?

Iraq Funding and the Mission Accomplished Anniversary "Coincidence"

it was pure desiteous intent. They are losels on and all. (Link)

3 misspelled words out of 11 - Jethrine?

From a Giuliani thread

I am 30 years old, a conservative, a republican, a huge fan of Ronald Reagan, Oliver North, GW Bush, and Donald Rumsfeld. And to paraphrase Maggie Thatcher, we can't go soft now on this group of people hell bent on destroying our way of life. We need to elect another president with a set of cajones.

Shame - only 30 yrs. old! In the immortal words of Dan Quayle "a wasted mind is a terrible thing."

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, April 28, 2007
Dropping like flies
posted by Clyde
5:35 AM

Justice Dept official resigns over investigation connected with Abramoff

A senior Justice Department official has resigned after coming under scrutiny in the Department's expanding investigation of convicted super-lobbyist Jack Abramoff, according to a Justice Department official with knowledge of the case.

Making the situation more awkward for the embattled Department, the official, Robert E. Coughlin II, was deputy chief of staff for the criminal division, which is overseeing the Department's probe of Abramoff.

He stepped down effective April 6 as investigators in Coughlin's own division ratcheted up their investigation of lobbyist Kevin Ring, Coughlin's long-time friend and a key associate of Abramoff.

When contacted at his home in Washington, Coughlin said he resigned voluntarily because he was relocating to Texas. "I was not asked to resign," he said in an interview with McClatchy Newspapers. "It's important to me that it's made clear that I left voluntarily."

Criminals All

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

More from the morality crowd
posted by Clyde
5:23 AM

Senior (Bush) Official Linked to Escort Service Resigns

Deputy Secretary of State Randall L. Tobias submitted his resignation Friday, one day after confirming to ABC News that he had been a customer of a Washington, D.C. escort service whose owner has been charged by federal prosecutors with running a prostitution operation. Tobias, 65, Director of U.S. Foreign Assistance and administrator of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), had previously served as the Ambassador for the President's Emergency Fund for AIDS Relief.

A State Department press release late Friday afternoon said only he was leaving for "personal reasons." On Thursday, Tobias told ABC News he had several times called the "Pamela Martin and Associates" escort service "to have gals come over to the condo to give me a massage." Tobias, who is married, said there had been "no sex," and that recently he had been using another service "with Central Americans" to provide massages.

Tobias' private cell number was among thousands of numbers listed in the telephone records provided to ABC News by Jeane Palfrey, the woman dubbed the "D.C. Madam," who is facing the federal charges. In an interview to be broadcast on "20/20" next Friday, Palfrey says she intends to call Tobias and a number of her other prominent DC clients to testify at her trial.

"I'm sure as heck not going to be going to federal prison for one day, let alone, four to eight years, because I'm shy about bringing in the deputy secretary of whatever," Palfrey told ABC News.

Hooker-gate

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, April 27, 2007
I thought he listened to the Murkin people?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:52 PM

Poll: Most Americans Don't Want Veto of Iraq Funding Bill

The Pew Research Center has just released a poll that found six out of 10 Americans do not want President Bush to veto the Iraq spending bill that calls for a timetable for troop withdrawal. That's almost as many Americans as voted for Al Gore for president in 2000!

The challenge is that neither side seems inclined to compromise: 54 percent of withdrawl timeline supporters do not want the Senate to compromise with Bush to avoid a veto; likewise, 54 percent of those opposed to a timeline for withdrawal do not want Bush to back down on his veto promise. Not that that's very likely.

Dumbya

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Anti-Gonzales Hero Marine Arrested On Hill!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:55 AM

Hat-tip to Wonkette:

Oh no, everybody's favorite anti-war Marine maybe got arrested at the Hart building!

The photo caption from Getty has no info beyond some kind of protest happened, but a Wonkette Operative tells us Adam Kokesh got arrested by these Capitool Police. Adam, please come by and tell us that you are all right. Seriously, there is going to be some kind of mass emotional breakdown amongst Wonkette's commenters if your safety isn't established.

Update: Video of 14 people were arrested in the Hart Senate Office Building, for unlawful assembly while protesting to stop the war in Iraq and calling for impeachment.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bleeding with irony
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
6:58 AM

Just like our troops in Iraq:

'Dead before arrival'
IRAQ - Bush promises veto as Democrats pass withdrawal bill

WASHINGTON -- In a bold wartime challenge to President Bush, the Democratic-controlled Congress cleared legislation Thursday to begin withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq by Oct. 1 with a goal of a complete pullout six months later.
The White House dismissed the legislation as ''dead before arrival.''

The 51-46 Senate vote was largely along party lines, and like House passage a day earlier it underscored that the war's congressional opponents are far short of the two-thirds majority needed to override a Bush veto.

Democrats marked Thursday's final passage with a news conference during which they repeatedly urged Bush to reconsider his veto threat.

Troops held hostage

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush: God talks to me and says global warming is a hoax. Pope: Those voices in your head aren't God. And He says to quit f**king up His Creation.
posted by Wally
6:56 AM

Vatican issues new green message for world's Catholics

More evidence was revealed yesterday that the (ahem) leader of the most powerful and technologically advanced nation on earth has less scientific savvy than the top religious dude in the Western Hemisphere.
The Vatican yesterday added its voice to a rising chorus of warnings from churches around the world that climate change and abuse of the environment is against God's will, and that the one billion-strong Catholic church must become far greener.

Observers said yesterday that the Catholic church is no longer split between those who advocate development and those who say the environment is the priority. Cardinal Renato Raffaele Martino, head of the Pontifical Council of Justice and Peace, said: "For environment ... read Creation. The mastery of man over Creation must not be despotic or senseless. Man must cultivate and safeguard God's Creation."
Guardian
It will be interesting to see how all the extremist righties will deal with this, especially staunch Catholics (like my sister) who have been grovelling and worshipping at the feet of Bush and hanging on his every word. How will the holiday conversations change now that the Pope has directly contradicted their hero?

More importantly, will this have any impact on policy in the United States? Even high ranking members of the Vatican hope so.
Cardinal Renato Martino, a senior adviser to Pope Benedict, said on Thursday he believes the Pontiff should raise the dangers of climate change and global warming with U.S. President George W. Bush when the two meet in June.

The Bush administration, which did not sign up to the Kyoto Protocol on Climate change, has long been reluctant to curb the greenhouse gases blamed for swelling sea levels and causing droughts as well as floods.

Bush pulled out of the treaty, which Washington had signed under the previous, Democratic, administration, saying it would damage the economy and was unfair as it did not require rapidly developing nations like China and India to stem emissions.

Asked if willful damage of the environment is a sin, Martino said: "Yes, because not using the environment correctly is an offence not only against yourself but against all others who make use of the environment."
Reuters
Logic doesn't work. Reason doesn't work. Evidence doesn't work. Maybe putting the fear of god into him will finally get Bush to change his tune. But since that will involve admitting that he's wrong, I'm not holding my breath.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:32 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption

(click image for bigger picture and story)

Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, April 26, 2007
Bush Busts a Move - and if you thought you were embarrassed by the President before...
posted by Wally
1:39 PM

As an old white guy with no-rhythm, no "moves", and no soul (not to be confused with soul-less - that would be Cheney), I feel obligated to post this video as an inspiration to like minded people everywhere. To everyone who is afraid or embarrassed to get up and dance in public because you don't know how, or think you don't have the rhythm or moves, I offer some inspiration from the President.



Next time you feel the urge to bust a move, but aren't drunk enough, just remember, compared to this clown, you're freaking Fred Astaire.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

I voted for the continued killing of our troops.
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:29 PM

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 110th Congress - 1st Session

H.R. 1591 (U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 )

YEAs 51
NAYs 46
Not Voting 3

Lieberman (ID-CT), Nay

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

"ridiculous P.R. stunt"
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:14 PM

Dems to send Iraq bill to Bush on Mission Accomplished Day! GOP says "P.R. stunt"

GOP Pledges to Uphold Bush Iraq Veto

Senate Republicans promised Thursday to uphold President Bush's veto on a bill that would order troops home from Iraq. Democrats said they would pass it anyway.

"The president has failed in his mission to bring peace and stability to the people of Iraq," said Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.V., chairman of the Appropriations Committee. He later added: "It's time to bring our troops home from Iraq."

(snip)

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino called it a "ridiculous P.R. stunt" if Democratic lawmakers timed the sending of the bill to the anniversary of Bush's speech. "That is the height of cynicism, and absolutely so unfortunate for the men and women in uniform and their families who are watching the debate," she said Thursday morning.

Codpiece Day
Ummm.....and this is not a "p.r. stunt?"

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Poor pissypants
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:59 AM

Bush Approval Rating Falls to 28%, Lowest Level So Far, in Harris Poll

President Bush's approval rating slipped to new lows in the most recent Harris Interactive survey, but he's not alone: For the first time since the series began, all of the political figures and institutions included in the survey have negative performance ratings.

Of the 1,001 American adults polled online April 20-23, only 28% had a positive view of Mr. Bush's job performance, down from 32% in February and from a high of 88% in the aftermath of the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The current rating is his weakest showing since his inauguration.

28

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wanted: Dead Or Alive? Then why is Osama still running the show?
posted by Wally
7:41 AM

Remember these great lines from our fearless leader?

"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
~ Sept 13, 2001

"I want justice.... There's an old poster out West, as I recall, that said, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive'"
~Sept 17, 2001

"He is not escaping us. This is a guy who, three months ago, was in control of a county. Now he's maybe in control of a cave. He's on the run."
~ Dec 28, 2001

Then what's all this about then?
Osama bin Laden is orchestrating militants' operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, a senior Taliban commander said in remarks broadcast on Wednesday.

"He is drawing plans in Iraq and Afghanistan ... Praise God he is alive," Mullah Dadullah told Al Jazeera television.

Dadullah said bin Laden ordered the attack on Feb. 27 at the U.S. Bagram base during a visit by U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney to Afghanistan.

"He (bin Laden) guided us through it," he said, adding that no Afghan would have been able to penetrate the base if it was not for the world's most wanted militant.

5 1/2 Years Later

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Old News: Pentagon and Bush Admin Called Liars. New News: This Time It's By Soldiers
posted by Wally
6:37 AM

The Truth About Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman Cover-ups Revealed in Congressional Testimony

In the early stages of the Iraq war, Pat Tillman became a darling of the chickenhawk right when he gave up his NFL career to enlist in the Army, becoming a Ranger. When he was killed in action, the Pentagon claimed that he had died engaged in heroic combat in Afghanistan, and even awarded him a posthumous Silver Star. What they didn't count on was one of his fellow Rangers - one who was with him when he died - would be honest, upstanding, valiant (all those things you think of when you think of Army Rangers) - and would disobey orders to reveal the truth about his friend's death by "friendly fire".
The military at first portrayed Tillman's death as the result of heroic combat with the enemy. Army Spc. Bryan O'Neal told a congressional hearing that when he got the chance to talk to Tillman's brother, who had been in a nearby convoy on the fateful day, "I was ordered not to tell him what happened."

O'Neal said he was "quite appalled" by the order.

Kevin Tillman, in his testimony, accused the military of "intentional falsehoods" and "deliberate and careful misrepresentations" in the portrayal of his brother's death.

"Revealing that Pat's death was a fratricide would have been yet another political disaster in a month of political disasters ... so the truth needed to be suppressed," the brother said.
Tillman
Who can forget sweet little Jessica Lynch, fighting to her last bullet, then using her bayonet to fight off the enemy before finally being captured and held in an Iraqi hospital. Who wasn't mesmerized by her daring night time rescue, captured for the world to see on night vision cameras. What a great story to rally support for the war. Except that it was all a lie, made up from whole cloth. Now, in testimony before Congress, she is helping to blow the cover off of the lies and propaganda.
Ms Lynch criticised the Pentagon, saying: "I'm still confused why they lied and tried to make me into a legend." Ms Lynch said the real heroes were those who died in the attack and those who rescued her.

Initial reports also suggested that Ms Lynch had been abused after she came round in the hospital. She said the reports were lies: she had been treated well and the Iraqis had tried to return her to US forces.

"The nurses tried to soothe me and return me," she told the hearing, adding that she objected to the way in which the US military had portrayed her.

"American people don't need to be told elaborate tales" about US forces, she said.
Jessica
The very heroes that this administration "created" are coming back to haunt them. Is there anyone left, besides McCain, who will defend the actions and motivations of these incompetent arrogant warmongers in the White House?

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Sometimes you gotta love the media...
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:04 PM

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Spill the beans Condi
posted by Wally
12:26 PM

House panel votes to subpoena Rice on Iraq

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic lawmakers voted on Wednesday to subpoena Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to testify about administration justifications for the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.

On a party-line vote of 21-10, the House of Representatives' Oversight and Government Reform Committee directed Rice to appear before the panel next month.

"There was one person in the White House who had primary responsibility to get the intelligence about Iraq right -- and that was Secretary Rice who was then President George W. Bush's national security adviser," said committee Chairman Henry Waxman, a California Democrat.

"The American public was misled about the threat posed by Iraq, and this committee is going to do its part to find out why," Waxman said.
Do you think she'll try to beat Gonzo for the "Don't recall" world record?

Sing

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Spill the beans Monica!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
11:18 AM

Breaking: Goodling granted immunity

The House Judiciary Committee voted moments ago to grant immunity to Monica Goodling - former counsel to Alberto Gonzales and the Justice Department's liaison to the White House - and issue a subpoena compelling her to testify. Yesterday, fired U.S. Attorney David Iglesias said he believes that Goodling holds the "keys to the kingdom" in terms of uncovering the roots of the U.S. Attorney purge:

I think Monica Goodling is holding the keys to the kingdom. I think if they get her to testify under oath with a transcript, and have her describe the process between the information flow between the White House counsel, White House and the Justice Department, I believe the picture becomes a lot clearer.

Talk

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Jon Stewart lays the smackdown on McCain
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
9:52 AM

Part 1:


Part 2:

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Nice try Karl, but even the mainstream media is on to your games
posted by Wally
8:29 AM

The investigator investigating Rove is under investigation. Known for obstruction, stonewalling, and politicizing the Office of Special Council.

Karl Rove's tactics have become so familiar to even casual observers of the administration that within a day of the news that he had come under investigation by the Office of Special Council (see story below), even mainstream media outlets like ABC and the LA Times are questioning the motives of the investigation, and the man in charge of it, Scott Bloch.
Even as Special Counsel Scott J. Bloch moved forward with plans for a sweeping probe of the Bush administration, several advocacy groups complained that his ties to the administration and to conservative groups, as well as his record on gay rights and whistle-blowers, made him the wrong man for the job.

"There is a serious question as to whether Bloch will just provide cover for an administration that is covering for him," said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a Democratic-leaning group.
LA Times
The senior government official who says he is investigating Karl Rove for allegations he influenced government activity for partisan purposes is himself facing allegations of similar behavior.

Government watchdogs have accused Bloch himself of similar behavior. In April 2005, they and others complained the White House appointee had allowed his office to "sit on" a complaint that then-White House National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice used government funds to travel in support of President Bush's re-election bid.

By contrast, they said, Bloch ordered an immediate on-site investigation of a complaint that Bush's challenger for the White House, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., improperly campaigned in a government workplace, which had been filed around the same time.
ABC News
Now we find out that Bloch himself is under investigation. In addition to cronyism and blind loyalty to protect Bush, Rove, etc, we see that there is another, more selfish reason for him to delve into and obstruct the investigations in to White House impropriety. Protecting his own ass.
McFarland's investigation of Bloch, Miles says, "hasn't been a totally transparent process but we're hearing it's reaching a conclusion--which could be motivation for Bloch to start this investigation into the White House. If OPM does turn up any adverse information on Bloch, it would be more difficult for the White House to get rid of him while he was actively investigating them." But this could cut the other way. If Bloch is the subject of an investigation, he might be inclined to treat the White House favorably to protect his own position. In either case, there seems to be a conflict of interest. Bloch, Miles says, "may not be the appropriate person to be conducting the investigation" of Rove and the White House.

It is a dizzying situation. The investigator investigating officials who oversee the agency that is investigating the investigator.
The Nation
It took 6 years, but the public and the media are finally starting to catch on to how corrupt these people are, and the kinds of games they will play to try to cover up that corruption.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:27 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Bush at a Harlem charter school.

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Another Republican going down?
posted by Clyde
10:27 AM

FBI asks Tom Feeney about trip with Abramoff

The FBI has asked U.S. Rep. Tom Feeney for information about his dealings with Jack Abramoff as part of its ongoing investigation into the lobbyist convicted of defrauding clients.

FBI agent Kevin Luebke refused to say whether Feeney, a Republican from the Orlando area, is under federal investigation.

Federal agents also have asked the St. Petersburg Times for an email sent to the newspaper by Feeney's office describing a golfing trip the congressman took with Abramoff to Scotland in 2003.

Prison Population Explosion?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Rove On The Hot Seat? Office of Special Council Opens Investigation on Karl Rove - but could it be a Rovian trick?
posted by Wally
9:37 AM

In what at first blush sounds like reason to celebrate, the L.A. Times reported today that none other than Karl Rove is finally coming under investigation.
The Office of Special Counsel is preparing to jump into one of the most sensitive and potentially explosive issues in Washington, launching a broad investigation into key elements of the White House political operations that for more than six years have been headed by chief strategist Karl Rove.

The new investigation, which will examine the firing of at least one U.S. attorney, missing White House e-mails, and White House efforts to keep presidential appointees attuned to Republican political priorities, could create a substantial new problem for the Bush White House.

First, the inquiry comes from inside the administration, not from Democrats in Congress. Second, unlike the splintered inquiries being pressed on Capitol Hill, it is expected to be a unified investigation covering many facets of the political operation in which Rove played a leading part.
This is potentially explosive news of a potentially devastating investigation - the broadest and highest profile in the 106 year history of the Special Council. This is the kind of thing that should be keeping Rove, Bush, Cheney, and much of the GOP awake at night.

Except for one minor catch. Now that Rove is officially "under investigation" he can use the excuse that he's not at liberty to answer questions relating to any of this "during an ongoing investigation". Note that the Office of Special Council is part of the administration itself. It's not an independent council appointed by Congress or an outside body. Putting on the tinfoil hat and looking at tactics used by this administration in the past, I can not rule out the possibility that this is a Rovian trick to stonewall other inquiries. By dragging out the OSC investigation, he may be able to avoid answering any questions or answer for his actions at all.

So, while I'd love to announce this investigation as great news, I have to offer a sobering possibility. Like the misnamed "Healthy Forests" and "Clear Skies" initiatives, this investigation might be another underhanded way of intentionally avoiding the exact goal that it appears to be after. Exposing the truth. On the other hand, it really could be great news. We'll be watching.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Presidential hopefuls planning to clog up the inter-web tubes
posted by Wally
8:11 AM

Presidential debates set for cyberspace


With the growth of bloggers and online news sites (like ours, for instance), and with the growing distrust of the mainstream news media more and more people have been changing the way they get their news and information. Thanks to the likes of Fox News acting as the propaganda arm of the Republican party, and other news outlets failing to do their jobs and challenge things like the war, the Patriot Act, illegal wiretapping, etc, the public is losing faith in traditional news outlets and turning more to the independent voices on the internet. Howard Dean first took advantage of this trend in the 2004 campaign to raise buttloads of money for his own campaign. Again in '06, he used the internet for spreading information and fundraising for the Democratic party.

Campaign '08 is finally catching up and moving into the 21st century on a national level, with the first debates to be held "online".
The 2008 presidential contenders may soon be slugging it out in cyberspace, with pioneering online-only debates being planned for early next fall, a new media partnership says.

The political blog Huffington Post, online portal Yahoo and Slate Magazine will host the debates - one for Democratic candidates, one for Republicans - sometime after Labor Day, with PBS host Charlie Rose serving as moderator, the sponsors planned to announce Monday.

Voters will be invited to submit questions, and can blog in real time to share their opinions on the candidates' answers.

(snip)

Said Scott Moore, director of Yahoo's news and information service "It's a really significant, historic opportunity for the candidates to test their debate skills in a brand new format."

LINK
Another well deserved blow to Fox News. Another shot across the bow of all the mainstream networks and news outlets. With the elections still 18 months away, it's still way too early for this, in my opinion. But it's interesting to watch politics adapt to new technologies - in spite of what Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) says about the inter-tubes.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Now WE'RE the traitors?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
6:28 AM

I hope Bugman drops the soap many times in prison.

DeLay says top Dems close to treason

Democratic leaders are acting like traitors by opposing the Iraq war, and President Bush must answer with a toughened stance, former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay said Monday.

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi "are getting very, very close to treason," DeLay said in a meeting with the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

"We have people dying," he said. "Not just our soldiers, but innocent citizens dying in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hands of these evil people, and you have your elected leaders making these kinds of statements that embolden the enemy. It's unbelievable."

~snip~

Bush cannot afford to lose this fight, DeLay said. The president must demand a "clean bill" that does not set a withdrawal date or include so-called pork barrel spending on unrelated projects, he said.

"(Bush) comes back and says, 'I want a clean bill, and unless I get a clean bill with no pork in it, I'm going to veto it,' " Delay said. "See who blinks."

~snip-~

He remains under indictment in his home state of Texas on charges of money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering.

Hypocrite

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, April 23, 2007
Weeeeeeeeeee!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:52 PM

Kucinich Goes for Impeachment Against Cheney

April 23, 2007

ABC News' Jennifer Duck Reports: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) plans to hold a noon ET press conference on Tuesday to introduce articles of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney.

The noon presser is scheduled to be held in the Cannon Terrace of the Cannon House Office Building in Washington, DC.

Throes

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

SNL: TV Funhouse Torboto
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
9:13 AM

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Was Bush watching the same testimony as everyone else?
posted by Wally
9:01 AM

Arlen Specter (R-PA): "The attorney general's testimony was very, very damaging to his own credibility. It has been damaging to the administration, because without answers as to what really happened, there is a lot of speculation."

Charles Schumer (D-NY): "All of America saw why so many of us had felt for so long that he shouldn't be attorney general. He was not in command of the facts. He contradicted himself. And he doesn't really appreciate the role of attorney general."
LINK

Newt Gingrich (R-asshat): "I think it is a tremendous mistake, which this administration has made on several occasions, to have personal loyalty transcend service to this nation."
LINK
And then there is the President, who apparently lives more and more in a world isolated from the American people, isolated from his own party, isolated from reality.
Bush: Gonzales's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee "increased my confidence in his ability to do his job.... It was clear the attorney general broke no laws." "This is an honest, honorable man in whom I have confidence."
LINK

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Ronald Reagan: "Tear Down This Wall!" Dubya: "And put it up in Baghdad!" al-Maliki: "Oh no you didn't"
posted by Wally
6:38 AM

The U.S. military has been building a three-mile long 12-foot tall concrete wall in Azamiyah, a Sunni area that has frequently been the target of mortar attacks and bombings by Shiite militias. The stated intent of the wall was "protect the neighborhood", but almost immediately, area residents denounced the wall, saying it would isolate them, comparing it to the Berlin Wall and to the security wall that the Israeli's are building along the Gaza Strip. Even the Iraqi Prime Minister spoke out in opposition to it's construction.
2,000 of Iraqis took to the streets in the area in northern Baghdad to protest the wall's construction, which residents have complained would isolate them from the rest of the city.

Al-Maliki said he has ordered a halt to the U.S. military construction of the barrier Sunday in Cairo, Egypt, as he began a regional tour to shore up support from mostly Sunni Arab nations for his Shiite-dominated government.
Criticism of the wall has come from both Sunni's and Shia's
"Isolating parts of Baghdad with barbed wire and concrete barriers will inflict social and economic damage and it will lead to more sectarian tension," said the Sunni Iraqi Islamic Party. "This measure will harm the residents and it will have a negative impact on the areas instead of solving the problems."

Aides to al-Sadr, who had been a key al-Maliki backer but has since withdrawn his support, also criticized the barrier as an "unacceptable" move by the United States, saying they feared Shiite areas in Baghdad like Sadr City would be next.
Perhaps the Iraqis, unlike the U.S. occupiers, realize that cordoning the country off into a series of separate little fortresses is not going to bring the people of Iraq together as one united country. Besides, it will be hard for them to greet their liberators with flowers if they have to heave them over a 12 foot wall.

Gated Communities

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:27 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption

Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, April 22, 2007
This week's headlines - Gonzo-gate
posted by Clyde
7:11 AM

ABC - Gonzales on the Hot Seat

CBS - Gonzales' Support Among GOP Dwindling

CNN - Administration officials: Gonzales should step down

MSNBC - Support for Gonzales looking thin

And from the Fairly Unbalanced

Faux News - Gonzales Stands Firm

You'll have to scroll down to find it - wouldn't want something bad against a Republican as the lead story! No bias here - move along!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

This week in Freeperville
posted by Clyde
5:55 AM

More musings from the mildly moronic

Praying for PresiDunce Bush

Amen my precious sister. I too have the tears falling from my face as I sit here at work. I am in 100% agreement with you and what you have prayed. With your permission I would like to pass your pray on to my freinds and family.
Continued prayers and support for President Bush. What a man in these desperate times in history! Thank you God for putting him at our helm. (Link)

Yeah, what a guy

Freepers fed up with Fox

I agree with your sentiments entirely. FNC is just about the only source of reasonably unbalanced news, but the fact is, they aren't very deep in terms of staffing below the anchor level. (Link)

My sentiments exactly

Bush and Democratic fundraising

They hate the President in a way that has not been seen before in history of the country. Their hate will destroy them. (Link)

Alzheimers starting a little early?

House vote to give D.C. a congressional rep.

Hell no, I wouldn't!!!!!!!! If I had a rep, then my neighbors would have one too, and at LEAST 70% of them believe...
1. crack wan invented in a US gov. lab and spread in the cities to kill black people
2. aids was invented in a US gov. lab and spread in the cities to kill black people
3. OJ was framed
Also, better than 70% of the adult male population is under arrest, indictment, in jail, or on a court supervised program of one sort or another.
I don't want these people on the same planet as I, and I sure don't want them having congressional representation of any kind. (Link)

Imus devotee no doubt

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, April 21, 2007
More love for the troops
posted by Clyde
6:48 AM

Soldier says he was deployed with head injury

After an hour of bench-pressing a log weighing several hundred pounds during Army Special Forces selection training in February 2006, five soldiers lying on their backs at Fort Bragg, N.C., reacted quickly to the next order:

"Drop back!"

So quickly, in fact, that when they dropped the log, it landed on Spc. Paul Thurman's head. "I shook for a moment, and then went limp," Thurman told Military Times. "I was unconscious for a minute or two, and then I went back to training."

An MRI later showed that Thurman had lesions on the right parietal lobe of his brain, a condition that led to a "don't deploy" order - which the Army violated, according to Thurman. Worse, rather than providing compassionate understanding of the symptoms associated with traumatic brain injury, he said leaders at Fort Carson, Colo., have harassed him, refused him medication and pushed for an Article 15.

Cannon fodder

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

When will it stop?
posted by Clyde
6:43 AM

Analysis: Iraq surge may be extended

The Pentagon is laying the groundwork to extend the U.S. troop buildup in Iraq. At the same time, the administration is warning Iraqi leaders that the boost in forces could be reversed if political reconciliation is not evident by summer.

This approach underscores the central difficulty facing President Bush. If political progress is not possible in the relatively short term, then the justification for sending thousands more U.S. troops to Baghdad - and accepting the rising U.S. combat death toll that has resulted - will disappear. That in turn would put even more pressure on Bush to yield to the Democratic-led push to wind down the war in coming months.

If the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki does manage to achieve the political milestones demanded by Washington, then the U.S. military probably will be told to sustain the troop buildup much longer than originally foreseen - possibly well into 2008. Thus the early planning for keeping it up beyond late summer.

Link

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Shades of Ney
posted by Clyde
6:39 AM

Congressman defiant as FBI investigates

A day after stepping down from a House committee amid news that his home was searched by the FBI, Rep. John Doolittle on Friday proclaimed his innocence and vowed to stay in Congress and seek re-election.

The California Republican, a nine-term incumbent under scrutiny in the Jack Abramoff congressional corruption scandal, also said he will seek the House Ethics Committee's permission to establish a legal fund to raise money for his defense.

Doolittle agreed Thursday to resign his coveted spot on the House Appropriations Committee temporarily."I have no intention of resigning from Congress and I have every intention of running for re-election again," Doolittle told reporters from his district in a conference call.

Link

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, April 20, 2007
I want to live in his world
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
2:00 PM

Everything must be rosey. Our enemies throw flowers and magic ju-ju beans at our feet. They sure must love us.

Iraq Pullout Would Lead To Bloodbath, Bush Warns

President Bush warned Thursday that pulling out of Iraq too soon would trigger a bloodbath akin to that of the Cambodian killing fields of the 1970s, while Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid declared that it is too late to stay because the war has already been lost.

On a day that reverberated with echoes of the Vietnam War era, Bush and Reid (D-Nev.) engaged in a long-distance debate over the lessons of history and the fate of the latest overseas war as part of a struggle over $100 billion in funding for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Reid cast Iraq as another Vietnam and Bush as another Lyndon B. Johnson, while the president described dire consequences if the past repeats itself.

"I want to remind you that after Vietnam, after we left, millions of people lost their life," Bush said here when an audience member asked about comparisons between Vietnam and Iraq. "The Khmer Rouge, for example, in Cambodia. And my concern is there would be a parallel. . . . The same thing would happen. There would be the slaughter of a lot of innocent life. The difference, of course, is that this time around, the enemy wouldn't just be content to stay in the Middle East; they'd follow us here."...

AWOL
Sidenote: Where does this fugger get off saying shit like "they'd follow us here."? Remember that talking point? "We have to fight them over there instead of fighting them here." What a bunch of bullshit! I'd rather fight an invader over here. No one knows our country better than us. Just ask the British. Why do you think our boys are getting fragged so often over there? The Iraqi's know their land better than we do.

And finally, President Chucklenuts: April 2007: The deadliest month of the Iraq occupation

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Put a fork in him
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
12:19 PM



and...

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:48 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption

Permalink :: 11 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Even Rove is bailing!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
6:44 AM

That leaves Bush and Darth who think the war was a good idea. We wonder if Bush will call him "Cut-and-Run" Rove?

Rove: "I Wish The Iraq War Never Existed"

On a visit to Ohio yesterday, White House senior political adviser Karl Rove claimed he never wanted the war in Iraq:

"I wish the war were over," Rove said. "I wish the war never existed... History has given us a challenge."

(snip)

Rove also claimed yesterday that it was bin Laden, not President Bush, who decided to launch the Iraq war:

In a question-and-answer period after his speech, Rove was asked whose idea it was to start a pre-emptive war in Iraq.

"I think it was Osama bin Laden's," Rove replied.

Turd Blossom

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, April 19, 2007
Pro-life hunter Mitt Romney (R-MA) paid $250 for Dick Swett in '92
posted by Wally
1:27 PM

Another GOP Sex Scandal? No, actually, just more proof of how far the Republican presidential candidate has flipped and flopped over the years, having donated to several "solidly liberal" Democratic candidates in the past.
Willard Mitt Romney donated $250 in 1992 to then-U.S. Rep. Dick Swett's (D.-N.H.) successful re-election campaign. The one-term congressman served another term before losing to Republican Charles Bass in 1994.

In 1992, the former Massachusetts governor and current Republican presidential contender also donated $250 to Rep. John J. La Falce (D.-N.Y.) and $1,000 to Douglas Delano Anderson, an unsuccessful Democratic primary candidate for the U.S. Senate seat held by Utah Republican Jake Garn, who retired that year.

The two Democratic House members who Romney funded were solidly liberal. For 1992, Rep. Swett had a 32 rating (out of 100) from the American Conservative Union and an 85 from the liberal Americans for Democratic Action. That year, LaFalce scored a 12 ACU rating and a Swett-like 85 from the ADA.

Campaign spokesman Kevin Madden said "I think he was friendly with Dick Swett."
File that little tidbit under "too much information".

He's got balls

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wolfowitz should have learned from the GOP, nothing ruins a political career like a sex scandal
posted by Wally
12:41 PM

After all the different ways that Wolfie has royally screwed up over the years, and has gotten away with it, it looks like he's going to finally be taken down - by of all things, a sex scandal.

Now that he's in the hot seat, it's fun to watch him squirm and wriggle and try to worm his way out of it. Hell, he even looks like a weasel. First he said it was an honest mistake. Then he apologized, as if that would make it all better. Then he tried the excuse that he was operating "in new territory" and was trying to "do the right thing" for the World Bank - as if anyone could ever believe that pulling strings and calling in favors to have your friends hire your girlfriend for a $200,000 a year taxpayer paid job was anything but cronyism, and certainly not "doing the right thing".

Now, in typical Neo-con style, he's offering to fire other people to make up for his blunder.
Fighting to keep his job, World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz is offering to make management changes at the institution, officials close to the situation said Thursday.

The overture - which came during a meeting of bank vice presidents on Wednesday - was made as Wolfowitz is facing mounting calls for his resignation. The controversy is over Wolfowitz's role in arranging a high-paying job for Shaha Riza, a bank employee who he has dated.

Wolfowitz spoke in general terms for the need to improve the bank's management, including that of his inner office.
This administration is truly amazing. Every time I think they've hit rock bottom and can't possibly sink any lower, they manage to prove me wrong. This is typical of them though. Get caught red handed doing something blatantly unethical, and offer someone else's head on a block. How soon until they run out of willing necks, and have to stand and face up for their own behavior? Not soon enough if you ask me.

The Buck Stops Over There

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Hopeful sign that the Democrats have found their spine
posted by Wally
7:01 AM

Yesterday, Democratic Congressional leaders went to the White House to discuss the Iraq War Supplemental Spending Bill. In their meeting with Bush - who clearly stated that it would not be a negotiation - the Dems apparently refused to be cowed by the Bully In Chief.
President Bush sparred across the table with Democratic congressional leaders opposed to the Iraq war on Wednesday in a prelude to a veto showdown over a conflict that has claimed the lives of more than 3,200 U.S. troops.

During an hourlong meeting at the White House, the president told lawmakers directly he will not sign any bill that includes a timetable for a troop withdrawal, and they made it clear Congress will send him one anyway.
Now let's see if they follow through with what they say and refuse to back down, or if, as we've seen so often in the past, they cave in to the presidential temper tantrum and give him everything he wants to try to quiet him down.

Hope

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Today Is Gonzo's Big Day
posted by Wally
6:29 AM

After weeks of stonewalling, tapdancing, trying to weasel out of it, and finally "rehearsing" for the occasion, Alberto Gonzales will face the Senate Judiciary Committee this morning. More importantly, he'll be under oath.
The Senate Judiciary Committee scheduled a daylong hearing for Gonzales' first appearance under oath since the firings set off an uproar in February that has only escalated with a bewildering series of conflicting accounts from the attorney general, his current and former aides and White House officials.

Gonzales himself has provided differing versions of the events, first saying he had almost no involvement in them and then later acknowledging that his role was larger, but only after e-mails about meetings he attended were released by the Justice Department to House and Senate committees.
It appears that neither the Democrats nor Republicans on the committee will be lobbing him softball questions or letting him weasel out of answering.
Some Republicans acknowledge that merely sticking to the talking points in Gonzales' prepared testimony will make it hard for him to hang onto his job. The committee's senior Republican, Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, dismissed the prepared remarks as "pablum."

Pablum
It's hard to argue with Senator Specter on that. Among the things he said in his prepared statement, which was released on Sunday:
"he admitted the ousters were mishandled and that he had been 'less than precise with my words' when he first discussed them."
"Less than precise with my words"? Could there be a less precise statement than that? Did he lie? Was he wrong? Did he intentionally obfuscate the situation? Was he just babbling because he didn't have the vaguest idea what the hell he was talking about and was trying to hide his incompetence? Precisely what the hell does "less than precise with my words" mean? Pablum indeed.

The hearings are set to begin at 9:30 ET today, and will be broadcast live on C-Span. It should be fun to watch.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Hey George and Dick, Tell Us Again How Well "The Surge" is Working
posted by Wally
12:11 PM

Car bombs kill 170 in Baghdad after PM's pledge
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Car bombs killed more than 170 people in Baghdad on Wednesday in the deadliest attacks in the city since U.S. and Iraqi forces launched a security crackdown aimed at halting the country's slide into civil war.

One car bomb alone in the mainly Shi'ite Sadriya neighborhood killed 122 people and wounded 155, police said.

"The street was transformed into a swimming pool of blood," Ahmed Hameed, a shopkeeper near the scene, told Reuters.

The bombings wounded more than 200 people.

Surge

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

So it begins - Supreme Court Fires First Salvo in Bush's "War on Women's Rights"
posted by Wally
10:43 AM

Supreme Court upholds late-term abortion ban

The decision marked the first time the nation's high court has upheld a federal law banning a specific abortion procedure since its landmark Roe v. Wade ruling in 1973 that women have a basic constitutional right to abortion.

The majority opinion written by Justice Anthony Kennedy rejected arguments the law must be struck down because it imposes an undue burden on a woman's right to abortion, it is too vague or too broad and fails to provide an exception for abortions to protect the health of a pregnant woman.

Ginsburg, who called the decision alarming, took the rare step of reading parts of her dissent from the bench. "In candor, the Partial Birth Abortion Act and the court's defense of it cannot be understood as anything other than an effort to chip away at a right declared again and again by this court -- and with increasing comprehension of its centrality to women's lives," she said.

"This ruling flies in the face of 30 years of Supreme Court precedent and the best interest of women's health and safety," said Eve Gartner of Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
Women of America, your bodies and your uteruses no longer belong to you. The Supreme Court just handed them to the government. You trust your government to make the right decision for you, don't you?

Me neither

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Call Now: Republican Call Girls!
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:20 AM

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

How bad is that?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
7:26 AM

Apparently the President is so desperate for friends, all you have to do is send him a fax and he'll show up a few weeks later. Of course, it is in Ohio:

Businessman's Invitation Prompts Presidential Visit

TIPP CITY, Ohio (AP) -- A contractor in Tipp City, Ohio, faxed the White House a couple of weeks ago to invite President Bush to come speak, and was flabbergasted when the White House faxed back, accepting.

Bush plans to speak there tomorrow.

Steve Bruns is former head of the Tipp City Area Chamber of Commerce and is a Bush backer. He says he wanted the president to explain why the "fight against the terrorists and victory in Iraq are so important."

White House spokesman Alex Conant says it's a "good opportunity to visit Ohio and talk about the war."

Bruns says when he looked at the fax accepting his invitation, he thought, "You've got to be kidding me."

The president is to speak at Tippecanoe High School to local businessmen and students who take an advanced government class.

A fax?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Will Bush visit the "convocation" for these young men and women?
posted by Wally
7:11 AM

Yesterday a tragedy happened at the Virginia Tech University. Bush made his appearance and said some touching words to support the friends and families of the fallen. Ironically, and unmentioned by the President or the press, even worse violence than this is faced every day by our young men and women overseas in Iraq and Afghanistan. Just because they couldn't afford to go to college, opting instead to serve their country in the military, it doesn't make the violence they face any less tragic. Putting on a uniform doesn't make it any easier to die, or to watch your friends die around you. Yet that is what they deal with every day - at an increasing pace.
Over the past six months, U.S. troops have died in Iraq at the highest rate of the war, an indication that the conflict is becoming increasingly dangerous for U.S. forces even after more than four years of fighting.

From October 2006 through last month, 532 American soldiers were killed, the most during any six-month period of the war. March also marked the first time that the U.S. military suffered four consecutive months of 80 or more fatalities. April, with at least 58 service members killed through Monday, is on pace to be one of the deadliest months of the conflict for American forces.
3311
George Bush found time to attend the convocation at VA tech. When will he similarly honor even one soldier who has died in his war? When will he show the same compassion for those who have fallen under his command, in uniform, far away from home and family?

What happened at VA Tech was horrible. What is happening in Iraq is also horrible. Ignoring it doesn't make it any less so.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:38 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya at the memorial convocation at VA Tech

Permalink :: 7 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Why is George in such a hurry all of a sudden?
posted by Wally
2:12 PM

After 9/11 it took him 3 1/2 days to find his way to Ground Zero

After Katrina it took him 3 full days after the levees broke to visit the Gulf Coast (he didn't even cut his vacation short until New Orleans was under water)

He STILL hasn't gone to a single serviceman or servicewoman's funeral from his adventure in Iraq. Nor will he allow pictures of returning caskets.

But after the Virginia Tech shootings yesterday, he is scheduled to speak on campus at the convocation tonight. Just what they need to add to the sorrow and heartbreak - to have to deal with Bush's massive security force and the ensuing traffic tie-ups and delays, and being frisked and questioned as they go to mourn their friends and classmates. I wonder if they'll have to sign a "loyalty oath" to be allowed in.

George, for the sake of the friends and families, stay away. Give them a few days to console each other in private. Next week some time, when the shock has passed and things have begun to sink in, then head to VA and make a nice speech and take some pictures hugging some crying people pretending that you care. This is a photo op that can wait. Then again, imposing yourself in deeply personal issues has never bothered Bush before. This is the guy who flew from Crawford to D.C. in the middle of the night to sign the Terri Schaivo bill at 1:11 am.

Now that I put it all together, I think I see the pattern - the smaller the crisis, the more urgent it is to Bush.
  • A single person - already dead - gets the red-eye flight.
  • A few dozen people get next day service.
  • 100's or 1000's dead, 100's of thousands homeless warrant a 3 day wait.
  • And for an entire war, just like during Vietnam, AWOL.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

"Gun Control" by Chris Rock
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
1:58 PM

An oldie but a goodie. I agree with Chris.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Baby steps
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:37 AM

April 17, 2007

Dear Colleague:

This week I intend to introduce Articles of Impeachment with respect to the conduct of Vice President Cheney. Please have your staff contact my office at 5-5871 if you would like to receive a confidential copy of the document prior to its introduction in the House.

Sincerely,

/s/

Dennis J. Kucinich

Member of Congress

Bye Darth

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Britain bails on the "War on Terror"
posted by Wally
7:06 AM

The "coalition of the willing" is shrinking. George's only remaining ally (sorry Eritria and Morocco, sending bomb-sniffing monkeys doesn't count) is quitting the "war on terror" - or at least quitting using the phrase "war on terror".
"In the U.K., we do not use the phrase 'war on terror' because we can't win by military means alone, and because this isn't us against one organized enemy with a clear identity and a coherent set of objectives," Benn told a meeting in New York organized by the Center on International Cooperation think tank.

He said the real struggle pits the "vast majority" of the world's people "against a small number of loose, shifting and disparate groups who have relatively little in common apart from their identification with others who share their distorted view of the world and their idea of being part of something bigger."

"What these groups want is to force their individual and narrow values on others without dialogue, without debate, through violence," Benn said. "And by letting them feel part of something bigger, we give them strength."
Let's call the "terrorists" what they are. These people are not warriors in some great war. They are not heroes or martyrs. They are thugs and criminals on the fringe of society. They are outcasts and losers. They are nothing more than murderers, killing innocent bystanders. What kind of "warrior" targets women and children where they work and shop and play?

Terrorism is not an act of war, it is a cowardly criminal act. These people should be arrested and marginalized, not elevated and legitimized. Benn is right. Let's stop giving these murderers more credit than they are due. Stop giving them so much freaking attention. Ignoring them might not make them go away, but it will stop encouraging others to join them. If the goal is to stamp out terrorism, the first step should be to stop doing their recruiting for them.

Terrorists Are Not Warriors

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Justice Department Fails to Comply with House Judiciary Subpoena
posted by Wally
6:42 AM

Isn't the Department of Justice, by definition, supposed to "uphold" the law? In Bushworld, under Gonzo's (ahem) leadership, the rules have apparently changed, and the DOJ gets to make up the law on the fly
.(Washington, DC)- Today, U.S. House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) issued the following statement in response to the Justice Department's failure to comply with the Committee's subpoena response deadline of 2 p.m. today. The subpoena seeks information the Department has continued to refuse to provide or has provided only in redacted form.

"We are disappointed that the Justice Department failed to produce the documents and other materials for which we issued a subpoena last week. While we understand that the Department considers this effort a priority and we plan to continue working with them, we will review all available legal options to secure compliance with the subpoena."
If you or I ignored a subpoena, guess who it would be hauling us off to prison. The DOJ. If a corporation ignores a subpoena, guess who comes after them. The DOJ. In typical hypocritical unaccountable Bush admin manner, Gonzales thinks he can ignore the rules enforced by his own department. We can't let them get away with it. Call your House Representative and encourage him or her to demand that the Justice Department obey the law and answer the subpoena.

Justice

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, April 16, 2007
Retired Marine Corp General John J. Sheehan: Why I Declined To Serve as Bush's War Czar
posted by Wally
1:29 PM

Bush is still looking for a "War Czar" for the middle east - some one in a Cabinet level position who would manage the Iraq and Afghanistan (and maybe Iranian and Syrian) wars, make strategic and policy decisions, etc. Someone to play the role of a - "Commander in Chief" - if you will. So far, he's had no takers. Here's one retired General's explanation why he turned the job down.
When asked whether I would like to be considered for the position of White House implementation manager for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, I knew that it would be a difficult assignment, but also an honor, and that this was a serious task that needed to be done. I served as the military assistant to the deputy secretary of defense in the mid-1980s and more recently as commander in chief of the Atlantic Command during the Cuban and Haitian migrant operation and the reconstruction of Haiti. Based on my experience, I knew that a White House position of this nature would require interagency acceptance. Cabinet-level agencies, organizations and their leadership must buy in to the position's roles and responsibilities. Most important, Cabinet-level personalities must develop and accept a clear definition of the strategic approach to policy.

What I found in discussions with current and former members of this administration is that there is no agreed-upon strategic view of the Iraq problem or the region.

It would have been a great honor to serve this nation again. But after thoughtful discussions with people both in and outside of this administration, I concluded that the current Washington decision-making process lacks a linkage to a broader view of the region and how the parts fit together strategically. We got it right during the early days of Afghanistan -- and then lost focus. We have never gotten it right in Iraq. For these reasons, I asked not to be considered for this important White House position. These huge shortcomings are not going to be resolved by the assignment of an additional individual to the White House staff. They need to be addressed before an implementation manager is brought on board.

No Thanks

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

At least 22 dead, many wounded in Virginia Tech shooting
posted by Wally
12:12 PM

Tragedy and violence came home to the United States this morning when a gunman went on a shooting rampage on the Virginia Tech campus.
A gunman opened fire in a dorm and classroom at Virginia Tech on Monday, killing 21 people in the deadliest campus shooting rampage in U.S. history. The gunman was killed, bringing to death toll to 22, but it was unclear if he was shot by police or took his own life.

The name of the gunman was not immediately released, and investigators offered no motive for the attack. It was not immediately known if the gunman was a student.

FBI spokesman Richard Kolko in Washington said there was no immediate evidence to suggest it was a terrorist attack, "but all avenues will be explored."
Damn.

Our hearts go out to the victims and their families, friends, and fellow students.

Likewise, our hearts go out to the victims and families in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as Darfur, Somalia, and other violent hot-spots - people who face this type of tragedy and violence every day.

Tragedy

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Just sign it
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
12:07 PM

Does this dipshit realize the troops will have plenty of money? Does he realize the timeline is non-binding? Does he realize the "pork projects" in the bill were left out of his budget? Sign it chucklenuts. It's not like there's a bridge to nowhere in it. Just ask this poor guy.

Bush makes impassioned plea for war cash

U.S. President George W. Bush issued an impassioned plea to Congress on Monday for emergency cash to boost efforts in the Middle East.

In an emotive speech, Mr. Bush said the consequences of failure in Iraq "would be death and destruction in Iraq" and in the United States.

"Congress needs to put partisanship on hold. Send me an emergency spending bill that I can sign that gives our troops the support they need and gives the commanders the tools they need to complete this mission," Mr. Bush said.

The call came on the same day that England distanced itself from Mr. Bush's "war on terror" mantra.

Your War

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

The Abramoff Scandal Will Not Die - and That Should Make the White House Nervous
posted by Wally
8:06 AM

Justice Probes Abramoff Ties To White House

The Justice Department's Public Integrity Section is investigating connections between disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff and the White House, a probe that may be affected by missing White House emails.

Lawyers involved in the case said that beginning more than a year ago, federal prosecutors and Federal Bureau of Investigation agents interviewed Mr. Abramoff and other cooperating witnesses at length about numerous contacts between Mr. Abramoff and White House officials, including presidential adviser Karl Rove.

(snip)

Mr. Abramoff pleaded guilty in January 2006 to conspiracy to bribe public officials, including a member of Congress and several congressional staffers. He was sentenced to prison and, as required by his plea agreement, he has cooperated extensively with prosecutors.

Several former Abramoff associates who have pleaded guilty in related cases and are cooperating also have been questioned by prosecutors about Mr. Abramoff's ties to the White House.

Sing Jack, Sing

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Proving that Iraq's new government is stable and secure, al-Sadr's followers quit Iraqi Cabinet
posted by Wally
6:47 AM

In a show of dissent and dissatisfaction for Bush's hand-picked man Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, followers of Muqtada al-Sadr will "withdraw immediately" from the Iraqi Cabinet.
Al-Rubaie, speaking to reporters in Baghdad's heavily fortified Green Zone, said the Sadrists' withdrawal from the Cabinet was because the prime minister did not respond to demands made at last week's demonstration.

He also relayed a demand by al-Sadr's movement, that all detainees held by "occupation forces" be transferred to Iraqi authorities "because this is part of sovereignty."

"We will have a major role in working on a timetable in parliament. This will be our message to the government," al-Rubaie said. "Setting a timetable for the withdrawal will be done in parliament."

Other legislators said the withdrawal was likely to further destabilize al-Maliki's already shaky hold on power.
They want the U.S. out of their country. Most of us in the U.S. want us out of their country. We've overstayed our welcome - if we ever had a welcome to begin with. Bush is like the last drunk at the party - the guy who refuses to leave because there's still beer left, even though everyone else is gone. Stumbling around in a stupor, oblivious to the hints from the host and the people he came with that it's time to go.

We've done enough damage George. Let's go home.
Unfortunately, we're not going to be able to "sleep this one off"

But Don't Call It A Civil War

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:28 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya and U.N. Sec. General Ban Ki-moon

Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, April 15, 2007
In the news - Rove deleted emails
posted by Clyde
8:01 AM

ABC - Missing: Karl Rove's Emails

CBS - Rove Lawyer: E-Mail Deletion Unintentional

CNN - White House: Millions of e-mails may be missing

MSNBC - Lawyer: Rove didn't mean to delete e-mail

And from the Fairly Unbalanced

Faux News - Giuliani in a Dress: Will Voters Care?

I had to post something because there is not a single story about missing White House emails to be found. No bias here - move along!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

This week in Freeperville
posted by Clyde
6:18 AM

A plethora of platitudes from the pathetic!

Imus firing - Hillary's fault?

I was hoping to see some actual facts connecting Shrillary to the firing. Too bad they aren't there. Also, Mecca must be destroyed. (Link)

Don't try to figure this out, you'll only pop a blood vessel.

Bush defending Wolfowitz

He should be defending Goncalves, who is twisting in the wind over nothing. (Link)

OMG - It isn't even close! BWAHAHAHA

Bush slams Dems over war funds

For all of his faults on illegal immigration, Bush is a good good man and a GREAT president, determined and resolute. I am afraid we will not see another president like him in decades.

Let's hope not, where do they get these people?

A day in the life of the PresiDunce

This is one of the only places on FR where we can come and be sure that our President will be treated with the respect he deserves and has earned, and where WE will be treated with respect as well. (Link)

Sounds like there's some division in Freeperville!

Praying for PresiDunce Bush

Prayers up for our visionary president! (Link)

Visionary? Eating Turdblossom's mushrooms again, no doubt!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, April 14, 2007
These guys just do not know when to stop
posted by Clyde
5:47 AM

Bush asks Congress to alter 1978 eavesdropping law

The Bush administration asked Congress on Friday to expand the number of people it can subject to electronic surveillance in the United States.

The request was contained in a proposed bill authored by intelligence and Justice Department officials that also protects companies that cooperate with spy operations.

Legislation submitted a week ahead of a Senate hearing on government surveillance practices calls for the 1978 law that governs eavesdropping operations to be updated to combat the threat from Islamist militants who use computer and wireless technology that did not exist in the 1970s.

It was not clear what kind of reception the proposal would receive in Congress, where Democrats took over in January for the first time since 1994.

Big Brother

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Holy Joe kisses up again
posted by Clyde
5:32 AM

Key Senator (Lieberman SUCKS) backs creation of "czar" for Iraq

Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., says he supports the idea of appointing a senior-level official in the Bush administration to manage operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, adding that his committee might be able to play "a constructive role" in creating the new post.

"I like the idea," Lieberman told CongressDaily in an interview Thursday. "For all the people who have argued that the administration has been too focused on the military aspect of Iraq and Afghanistan, this is a way of saying, as I understand it, that ultimate victory is going to come not just because of military success but also . . . mostly because of political and economic success."

The Washington Post reported this week that aides to President Bush are evaluating a plan to create a so-called czar for Iraq and Afghanistan who would be empowered to cut through bureaucratic obstacles.

Lieberman, an independent who parts with Democrats on Iraq, said he envisions such a czar being primarily responsible for the non-military aspects of "post-conflict management," particularly in supporting provisional reconstruction teams. "This is a line that I think is unique and interesting to me and to our committee and so you can count on us to follow it," he said.

Loser

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, April 13, 2007
No one could have anticipated that....
posted by Clyde
1:06 PM

Rove didn't mean to delete email

Karl Rove's lawyer on Friday dismissed the notion that President Bush's chief political adviser intentionally deleted his own e-mails from a Republican-sponsored computer system.

The attorney said Rove believed the communications were being preserved in accordance with the law.

The issue arose because the White House and Republican National Committee have said they may have lost e-mails from Rove and other administration officials. Democratically chaired congressional committees want those e-mails for their probe of the firings of eight federal prosecutors.

"His understanding starting very, very early in the administration was that those e-mails were being archived," Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin, said.

Link

Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Works for me
posted by Clyde
9:34 AM

Immunity for a Key Gonzales Aide?

Will Congress grant Monica Goodling immunity from prosecution in order to compel her to testify about the Bush Administration's firing late last year of eight U.S. Attorneys?

Sources tell TIME that discussions are under way on Capitol Hill about whether to offer just such a deal to the key former aide to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. The discussions - still largely informal - follow Goodling's assertion of her Fifth Amendment privilege to refuse to testify about her role in the controversial firings. Were Goodling to receive some form of immunity, she could be legally compelled to testify or risk facing charges of contempt of Congress.

No decision to seek immunity for Goodling has yet been made. But the question of immunity may be inevitable, because of what some observers see as an endgame for Gonzales, who is scheduled to deliver crucial testimony on his role in the firings next Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Democrats have stressed that even if Gonzales resigns, their investigation into the dismissal of the U.S. attorneys will continue. In that event, the investigation's focus would likely shift to the role of the White House in the firings, and Goodling's contacts with the office of former White House counsel Harriet Miers and of top political advisor Karl Rove might be crucially important.

In fact, Goodling's testimony could prove more important than ever, given today's White House acknowledgement that numerous e-mails to and from key White House staff may have been lost or deleted in a violation of internal rules. What those messages might prove is uncertain, but many apparently involve Karl Rove, who reportedly used e-mail accounts as well as a Blackberry provided by the Republican National Committee for much of his computer traffic.

Link

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Good news for a change
posted by Clyde
9:29 AM

College Students Know More About Politics Than American Idol

The stereotype of the self-involved, culture-obsessed U.S. college student is wrong, according to a new study.

American college students today are actually very engaged in politics to the point that they are much more likely to know the names of their U.S. senators or congressional representatives than the names of winners of "American Idol," says political scientist Kent E. Portnoy of Tufts University.

His analysis of a national survey of 1,000 non-military men and women ages 18 to 24 included equal mixes of college students and non-college students and drew upbeat conclusions about the youngest cohort of potential voters.

"Young people seem to know more about politics than they know about popular culture," he said in a prepared statement. "This level of political knowledge stands in stark contrast to the image of young people as uninterested in and ignorant about politics and government."

Link

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:41 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, April 12, 2007
Olbermann: Bush Holds Troops Hostage
posted by Wally
1:15 PM

Bush still insists the Democratic congress and senate are sending him a bill that doesn't support the troops in Iraq. (In fact, it gives him every nickel he's asking for - just a provision to get the hell out of there).


Bush now is playing out a fake scenario - that after he vetoes the bill, it'll be the Democrats' fault for troops being redeployed or extended, thereby keeping them away from their families. As opposed to what you've been doing for the past four-plus years, Mr. President?

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

White House: "We lost 1000's of emails" Waxman: "You got some 'splainin' to do". IT guys (Dookie and Wally): "good luck trying to 'lose' an email"
posted by Wally
7:38 AM

The White House is trying to weasel out of having to provide the private RNC emails that were allegedly used - in violation of "The Hatch Act"* - to discuss the firing of federal prosecutors who weren't loyal enough to Bush. This time they are trying a novel approach. Normally they would go with the old standby "national security" reasons. That won't work in this case, because even this incompetent administration realizes that if they tried that excuse they'd have to answer why national security issues were being discussed across the unsecured RNC email system.

Instead, this time they are using the "dog ate my homework" excuse.
The White House said Wednesday that it may have lost what could amount to thousands of messages sent through a private e-mail system used by political guru Karl Rove and at least 50 other top officials, an admission that stirred anger and dismay among congressional investigators.
The same people who handed down Executive Orders saying the NSA, FBI, and CIA can read your emails and listen to your phone calls - is trying to claim that they "lost" these emails. Waxman was not amused.
"This is a remarkable admission that raises serious legal and security issues," said Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Los Angeles), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which is investigating the role of electoral politics in administration policymaking. "The White House has an obligation to disclose all the information it has."

Loss of the e-mail files would create a potential legal problem for the Bush White House: compliance with the Presidential Records Act, which was passed in 1978 in response to the Watergate scandal that enveloped Richard M. Nixon's presidency. The law was designed to ensure that presidential papers were preserved for historical and investigative purposes.
Between Dookie and I, we have over 30 years of IT experience. We have more than a passing familiarity with this kind of thing. Based on our experience and knowledge, we feel safe in saying that it is nearly impossible, short of a concerted, focused, overwhelming effort to "lose" an email.

Deleting an email doesn't make it go away. Formatting a hard drive doesn't make it go away, because you sent it to someone (or they sent it to you) Even if you format the hard drive of everyone who got the email it doesn't go away, because somewhere the email is backed up. Even if they lost or destroyed the "backup" from the email server, the email can still almost certainly be recovered with effort. If these emails were sent over the internet, the ISP still has them, in accordance with the new laws recently passed - you know, for "Homeland Security" issues. Any server they passed through will likely have some sort of record of them that can be used to recover them.

In short, you cannot "accidentally lose" an email. You cannot even purposely lose an email without involving a lot of people and a lot of effort and money. Let there be no doubt whatsoever, if those emails are truly gone, it was intentional.

It looks like the Patriot Act might backfire on these clowns, and actually do some good for the country after all. Who would have thought?

Cover Up

Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Top Generals turn down Bush for new "war czar" position to oversee Iraq and Afghani wars
posted by Wally
6:28 AM

The President is looking for someone to fill a new high level post, reporting directly to him, to oversee the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan - a sort of "Commander in Chief", if you will. But nobody is interested. When top ranking generals tell the President "thanks, but I'd rather die in a fire" it's a pretty safe bet that things aren't going as "swimmingly" in those two countries as some would have you believe.
Three retired generals approached by the White House about a new high-profile post overseeing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and reporting directly to the president have rejected the proposed post, leaving the administration struggling to find anyone of stature willing to take it on.

One of the four-star generals said he declined because of the chaotic way the war was being run and because Dick Cheney, the vice-president and the leading hawk in the Bush administration, retained more influence than pragmatists looking for a way out.

The deputy White House spokeswoman, Dana Perino, confirmed yesterday that George Bush was considering restructuring the administration to create a new post, dubbed the war tsar by US media. It would involve co-ordinating the work of the defence, state and other departments at what she described as a critical stage in the wars. One of the retired generals approached, Marine General John Sheehan, told the Washington Post: "The very fundamental issue is they don't know where the hell they're going."

The unwillingness of the generals to take the job undermines recent attempts by the Bush administration to put a positive spin on the Iraq war. Mr Bush has claimed repeatedly over the past few weeks that there are signs his strategy of pouring extra US troops into Baghdad and neighbouring Anbar province is working.

Help Wanted

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, April 11, 2007
A Craigslist post from one VERY angry Marine
posted by Wally
8:18 AM

I'm having the worst damn week of my whole damn life so I'm going to write this while I'm pissed off enough to do it right.

I am SICK of all this bullshit people are writing about the Iraq war. I am abso-fucking-lutely sick to death of it. What the fuck do most of you know about it? You watch it on TV and read the commentaries in the newspaper or Newsweek or whatever god damn yuppie news rag you subscribe to and think you're all such fucking experts that you can scream at each other like five year old about whether you're right or not. Let me tell you something: unless you've been there, you don't know a god damn thing about it. It you haven't been shot at in that fucking hell hole, SHUT THE FUCK UP!

How do I dare say this to you moronic war supporters who are "Supporting our Troops" and waving the flag and all that happy horse shit? I'll tell you why. I'm a Marine and I served my tour in Iraq. My husband, also a Marine, served several. I left the service six months ago because I got pregnant while he was home on leave and three days ago I get a visit from two men in uniform who hand me a letter and tell me my husband died in that fucking festering sand-pit. He should have been home a month ago but they extended his tour and now he's coming home in a box.

You fuckers and that god-damn lying sack of shit they call a president are the reason my husband will never see his baby and my kid will never meet his dad.

And you know what the most fucked up thing about this Iraq shit is? They don't want us there. They're not happy we came and they want us out NOW. We fucked up their lives even worse than they already were and they're pissed off. We didn't help them and we're not helping them now. That's what our soldiers are dying for.

Oh while I'm good and worked up, the government doesn't even have the decency to help out the soldiers whos lives they ruined. If you really believe the military and the government had no idea the veterans' hospitals were so fucked up, you are a god-damn retard. They don't care about us. We're disposable. We're numbers on a page and they'd rather forget we exist so they don't have to be reminded about the families and lives they ruined while they're sipping their cocktails at another fund raiser dinner. If they were really concerned about supporting the troops, they'd bring them home so their families wouldn't have to cry at a graveside and explain to their children why mommy or daddy isn't coming home. Because you can't explain it. We're not fighting for our country, we're not fighting for the good of Iraq's people, we're fighting for Bush's personal agenda. Patriotism my ass. You know what? My dad served in Vietnam and NOTHING HAS CHANGED.

So I'm pissed. I'm beyond pissed. And I'm going to go to my husband funeral and recieve that flag and hang it up on the wall for my baby to see when he's older. But I'm not going to tell him that his father died for the stupidty of the American government. I'm going to tell him that his father was a hero and the best man I ever met and that he loved his country enough to die for it, because that's all true and nothing will be solved by telling my son that his father was sent to die by people who didn't care about him at all.

Fuck you, war supporters, George W. Bush, and all the god damn mother fuckers who made the war possible. I hope you burn in hell.

Craigslist

Permalink :: 11 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:42 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption of Dubya looking into the camera of a border patrol unmanned drone.

Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, April 10, 2007
Feingold Introduces Bill To End U.S. Military Involvement In Iraq
posted by Wally
1:43 PM

Senate Majority Leader Reid Cosponsors Legislation Forcing President to Safely Redeploy Troops by March 31, 2008

Washington, D.C. - U.S. Senator Russ Feingold introduced legislation today to effectively end U.S. military involvement in Iraq. The bill, supported by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, requires the President to begin safely redeploying U.S. troops from Iraq 120 days from enactment, as required by the emergency supplemental spending bill passed by the Senate. The bill ends funding for the war, with three narrow exceptions, effective March 31, 2008. In addition to Reid, the bill is cosponsored by Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Chris Dodd (D-CT), Ted Kennedy (D-MA), John Kerry (D-MA), Pat Leahy (D-VT), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI). If the President vetoes the emergency supplemental spending bill, Reid has said he will work to ensure Feingold's bill gets a vote in the Senate before Memorial Day.


"The President says he will veto legislation already passed by the Senate that both funds the troops and responds to Americans' demands for an end to the Iraq war," Feingold said. "Since the President refuses to change his failed Iraq policy, that responsibility falls on Congress. By setting a date after which funding for the President's failed Iraq policy will end, we can give the President the time and funding he needs to safely redeploy our troops so we can refocus on the global terrorist networks that threaten the lives of Americans."

The language of the legislation reads:

(a) Transition of Mission - The President shall promptly transition the mission of United States forces in Iraq to the limited purposes set forth in subsection (d).

(b) Commencement of Safe, Phased Redeployment from Iraq - The President shall commence the safe, phased redeployment of United States forces from Iraq that are not essential to the purposes set forth in subsection (d). Such redeployment shall begin not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

(c) Prohibition on Use of Funds - No funds appropriated or otherwise made available under any provision of law may be obligated or expended to continue the deployment in Iraq of members of the United States Armed Forces after March 31, 2008.

(d) Exception for Limited Purposes - The prohibition under subsection (c) shall not apply to the obligation or expenditure of funds for the limited purposes as follows:

(1) To conduct targeted operations, limited in duration and scope, against members of al Qaeda and other international terrorist organizations.

(2) To provide security for United States infrastructure and personnel.

(3) To train and equip Iraqi security services.

CommonDreams.Org

Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Gonzo gets served
posted by Clyde
1:08 PM

House panel subpoenas Gonzales documents

The House Judiciary Committee subpoenaed new documents Tuesday from Attorney General Alberto Gonzales as part of its investigation into the firings of federal prosecutors, with the panel chairman saying he had run out of patience.

"We have been patient in allowing the department to work through its concerns regarding the sensitive nature of some of these materials," Rep. John Conyers (news, bio, voting record), D-Mich., wrote Gonzales in a letter accompanying the subpoena. "Unfortunately, the department has not indicated any meaningful willingness to find a way to meet our legitimate needs.,"

"At this point further delay in receiving these materials will not serve any constructive purpose," Conyers said. He characterized the subpoena as a last resort after weeks of negotiations with Justice over documents and e-mails the committee wants.

The Justice Department did not have an immediate comment.

Link

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Don't know how long this will work, but...
posted by Wally
9:43 AM

Google put a lot of effort into fixing the "Google bomb" problem, but thanks to the ineptitude of the Bush White House, they managed to outsmart the good people at Google. We have no idea how long it will last, but for now, try this:

Go to Google
Enter the word "failure" (without the "").
Click on "I'm Feeling Lucky".
Wipe hands on pants.


(Thanks to our good friend Sam for this tip)

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Quote of the year from Katrina vanden Heuvel of The Nation on Colbert
posted by Wally
8:12 AM

What is it with Katrina's, the Bush administration, and a good blow?

After tearing into the Defense Department, the Bush administration, the 2000 election, she shuts Colbert up (no small feat) with this.
"Stephen, you know what I believe in? Truthiness. And you know what? The Nation Magazine opposed this war from the outset because we understood what a disaster it would be. We never lost our head, while too much of the media gave head."


Thank you Katrina, for pointing out to the world that the entire main stream media is wearing the blue dress now.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Supporting the Troops the Bush Way
posted by Wally
7:53 AM

Injured troops shipped back into battle
Salon has uncovered further evidence that the military sent soldiers with acute post-traumatic stress disorder, severe back injuries and other serious war wounds back to Iraq.
On March 9, Army Spc. Thomas Smith was ordered to board a plane from Fort Benning, Ga., to deploy back to Iraq, even though he was known to be suffering from chronic post-traumatic stress disorder from a previous tour there. Only weeks prior, military doctors determined that Smith should not be allowed around weapons because of his PTSD symptoms, which included bouts of sudden, extreme anger. Smith's medical records, obtained by Salon, also show that doctors had "highly recommended" that Smith not be deployed because of his condition.

But that did not stop Smith's commanders from ordering him to Iraq as his unit, the 3,900-strong 3rd Brigade of the 3rd Infantry Division, was rushing to move out as part of President Bush's so-called surge plan for securing Baghdad.

...one injured soldier who was deployed to Iraq in March wrote in an e-mail to Salon that her back condition has worsened significantly. "Now my left leg has started to go numb and they are telling me to double up on my meds, which I can't," she wrote. "They are not putting us in safe jobs at all. I still wear all of my gear and by the end of the day the pain is more than unbearable," she added. "I break my [physical] profile pretty much on a daily basis. At this point I will either go back [home] in a wheel chair or paralyzed or worse."

"Do what you can," she pleaded in the e-mail, "for the [injured soldiers] that come after me."
Even through her suffering, she is still thinking more of others than herself. These are the heroes who's lives are being wasted on this senseless war. And this is how they are being treated by this administration. Someone please explain to me again why the military keeps voting Republican.

Support the Troops

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

"Freeway-Blogging" in Chicago
posted by Wally
7:00 AM

Seen hanging over the inbound Kennedy Expressway (I-90) between O'Hare Airport and downtown.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Gonzo getting called out from all sides
posted by Wally
6:25 AM

Poor poor Alberto Gonzales taking heat everywhere he turns. First the mean old Democrats in Congress had the gall to actually try to perform their "oversight" responsibilities and investigate wrongdoing, wanting to speak to Dept of Justice officials (gasp) "under oath" and have a look at their documents. Then a handful of GOP Congressmen denounced his handling of the crisis du jour - as if there weren't already a boxcar-load of reasons for his denouncement. Even his old Texas buddy G. Dubya turned his back on him saying that Gonzo would have to go to the Capital and clear up his own damn problems.

He's progressed from idiots calling for his ouster, to criminals, to lower primates. Now he's hit a new low. When lower life forms start calling for your removal, it's time to go. When you can't even manage to maintain an ethical and competency level satisfactory for a Newt, you might be in a position for which you are uniquely unqualified.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Sunday that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales should consider resigning. The possible presidential candidate said the botched firing of U.S. attorneys has destroyed Gonzales' credibility as the nation's top law enforcer.

"I think the country, in fact, would be much better served to have a new team at the Justice Department, across the board," Gingrich said. "I cannot imagine how he is going to be effective for the rest of this administration."

Ouch
At the same time, Senators from both sides of the aisle are calling for still more documentation from the Justice Department. They are accusing the department of withholding relevant information, and they have their subpoena pens ready for action.
Specifically, the senators want the internal rankings of all 93 U.S. attorneys that were made by the Justice Department over the years, as well as employment charts that Monica Goodling, a top aide to Gonzales, provided for department officials as they decided which prosecutors to fire.

They also are seeking the department's ratings of all 93 prosecutors from last December, when seven of the eight were terminated.

Three Democrats on the committee -- Chairman Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Dianne Feinstein of California and Charles Schumer of New York -- and the panel's top Republican, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, asked that the documents be turned over by Wednesday so committee investigators can review them before Gonzales' scheduled testimony next Tuesday.
Chicago Trib
And thru all this, Gonzo is frantically cribbing for the grilling he's going to get in front of the Senate - and apparently it's not going so well.
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has virtually wiped his public schedule clean to bone up for his long-awaited April 17 testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee-a session widely seen as a crucial test as to whether he will survive the U.S. attorney mess. But even his own closest advisers are nervous about whether he is up to the task. At a recent "prep" for a prospective Sunday talk-show interview, Gonzales's performance was so poor that top aides scrapped any live appearances. During the March 23 session in the A.G.'s conference room, Gonzales was grilled by a team of top aides and advisers-including former Republican National Committee chair Ed Gillespie and former White House lawyer Tim Flanigan-about what he knew about the plan to fire seven U.S. attorneys last fall. But Gonzales kept contradicting himself and "getting his timeline confused," said one participant who asked not to be identified talking about a private meeting. His advisers finally got "exasperated" with him, the source added. "He's not ready."
Ready or not....

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, April 9, 2007
Chris Wallace Exposes Newt Gingrich's Pelosi Hypocrisy
posted by Wally
1:35 PM

CrooksandLiars.com has the video


On "FOX News Sunday" today, Chris Wallace confronted Newt Gingrich with the statements he made in 1997 on a trip to China in which he directly contradicted President Clinton's policy regarding Taiwan. Newt Gingrich — along with the right-wing echo chamber and short-memoried MSM — spent the week condemning Speaker Pelosi for doing what Speaker Gingrich did just a decade before. Only then, Gingrich carried a message that was in stark contrast to US foreign policy; something that Nancy Pelosi didn't do, despite baseless right-wing accusations to the contrary.

Glenn Greenwald documents the original news accounts of Gingrich's trip at Salon. It should also be noted that Dennis Hastert traveled to Columbia in 1997 to undermine President Clinton's policy towards that country. He even went so far as to say that the Columbian government should bypass the excutive and deal directly with Congress. IOKIYAR, though.

Thanks to CrooksandLiars.com

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

So much for rose petals
posted by Wally
6:37 AM

Iraqis Protest U.S. Occupation of Iraq

Tens of thousands of people marched to the city of Najaf today to protest the American occupation of Iraq.

The demonstrators marched to Najaf, 100 miles south of Baghdad, from neighboring Kufa, with two cordons of Iraqi police lining the route. The protest comes on the fourth anniversary of the fall of Baghdad.

Iraqi soldiers in uniform joined the crowd, which was led by at least a dozen turbaned clerics — including one Sunni, according to the A.P. Many marchers danced as they moved through the streets.

The demonstration was peaceful, but two ambulances could be seen moving slowly with the marching crowd, poised to help if violence or stampedes broke out, the A.P. reported.
We're not wanted there. We're not welcome there. We're not doing any good there. We should never have gone in the first place. We can't "win" there because nobody - including Chimpster McWarhardon - has defined what "winning" in this instance means. Why is there even a freaking debate about this?

Bring them home

UPDATE: The Guardian UK gives a slightly different number.
Hundreds of thousands of supporters of the radical Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr took to the streets of two Shia holy cities in Iraq today and protested against "US occupiers".

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:31 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit a caption

Permalink :: 8 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Sunday, April 8, 2007
In the news - Pope delivers Easter message
posted by Clyde
7:55 AM

ABC - Happy Easter? Pope Bemoans 'Continual Slaughter' in Iraq

CBS - Pope's Easter Message Decries War, Unrest

CNN - Pope: 'How much suffering' in the world

MSNBC - Pope laments 'slaughter'

And from the Fairly Unbalanced

Faux News - Pope Ushers in Easter

And they wonder why Edwards refuses to attend the debate. (Link)

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

This week in Freeperville
posted by Clyde
6:43 AM

Another review of rightwing retardation

Paying for PresiDunce Bush

My first time to respond to this thread - I see it and always grateful it is here. I pray for this president and the burdens he carries at least once a day. Your prayer is so uplifting - I can only say AMEN. (Link)

The English language is the burden for the Chief Chimp in charge!

Legal advice for Monica Goodling

What happens if your issued a subpoena and don't show up?
Nothing,Ha! (Link)

Hmmm Contempt of Congress perhaps? Moran, this is a series issue!!1!

McCain's Baghdad

So sue him for being an optomist. It could be worse or course. He is a high ranking senator so of course he will be guarded heavily. Maybe he is is trying to sell the new Iraq to people. (Link)

A gradiate of the Jethro Bodine Skool of Lernin?

15 British Marines Released

That is an excellent point. Society no longer wants to raise boys with what it takes to become war heros. (Link)

Former Hitler Youth?

Be Careful on this next one!

Found this on a thread about a GOP congressman urging Gonzo to resign

I'm not referring to Gonzales here, but just once I'd like to see the Pubs stand by an lying Republican crook until the bitter end just to stiff the DIms.
What refreshing change that would be. (Link)


If ignorance is bliss, these retards are positively giddy.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Saturday, April 7, 2007
Way to call it McCain
posted by Clyde
4:28 AM

U.S. general: Terrorists now need less help

Infiltration of arms and fighters from Syria into Iraq has slowed, but a major reason is that the terrorists of al-Qaida in Iraq now need less foreign help, a senior U.S. general said April 6.

Visiting this remote outpost, just a stone's throw from the border, Marine Maj. Gen. Walter E. Gaskin said the change has made persistent infiltration of men, weapons and money less of a concern to U.S. forces here.

However, it also suggests a troubling maturation of al-Qaida in Iraq, the main terrorist organization targeted by American troops in the country.

"Al-Qaida has become self-sufficient inside the country," Gaskin said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Stay the course

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Bush has no honor
posted by Clyde
4:17 AM

An about-face on honoring fallen troops

In a reversal by the US government four years into the war in Iraq, America's fallen troops are being brought back to their families aboard charter jets instead of ordinary commercial flights, and the caskets are being met by honor guards in white gloves instead of baggage handlers with forklifts.

That change -- which took effect quietly in January and also applies to members of the US military killed in Afghanistan -- came after a campaign waged by a father who was aghast to learn that his son's body was going to be unloaded like luggage.

John Holley said an airline executive told him that was the "most expeditious" way to get the body home.

"I said: 'That's not going to happen with my son. That's not how my son is coming home,' " said Holley, an Army veteran from San Diego whose son, Specialist Matthew Holley, was killed by a roadside bomb in Iraq in 2005. "If it was 'expeditious' to deliver them in garbage trucks, would you do that?"

Shame

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Friday, April 6, 2007
It will take a lot more than this to do the trick
posted by Wally
10:20 AM

Minnesota to Take Pigeon Eggs From Nests to Avoid Poop at Republican National Convention
ST. PAUL, Minn. - Pigeon poop has long sullied downtown St. Paul sidewalks, but the slippery, smelly mess is gaining urgency with the Republican National Convention coming to town next year.

Sticky foam, hawk balloons and nets haven't gotten rid of the birds, so officials have a new plan: stealing pigeon eggs.

After pigeons lay their eggs on rooftop nesting grounds, maintenance workers plan to sneak up through trap doors and grab the next generation before it hatches.

"We'll build them little condos. We'll keep taking the eggs, and they won't have little ones," said Bill Stephenson, the city's animal control supervisor. "Slowly they'll die off."

City officials also considered feeding contraceptives to the pigeons but rejected that idea on fears of also inadvertently sterilizing eagles or hawks.
What are they going to do about all the poop inside the convention? And what are they going to do with all the aborted pigeon fetuses they collect?

G.O.Poop

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:34 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption



Permalink :: 5 comments :: Post a Comment
 

But Dick, what about this?
posted by Clyde
6:24 AM

Hussein's Prewar Ties To Al-Qaeda Discounted
Pentagon Report Says Contacts Were Limited

Captured Iraqi documents and intelligence interrogations of Saddam Hussein and two former aides "all confirmed" that Hussein's regime was not directly cooperating with al-Qaeda before the U.S. invasion of Iraq, according to a declassified Defense Department report released yesterday.

The declassified version of the report, by acting Inspector General Thomas F. Gimble, also contains new details about the intelligence community's prewar consensus that the Iraqi government and al-Qaeda figures had only limited contacts, and about its judgments that reports of deeper links were based on dubious or unconfirmed information. The report had been released in summary form in February.

The report's release came on the same day that Vice President Cheney, appearing on Rush Limbaugh's radio program, repeated his allegation that al-Qaeda was operating inside Iraq "before we ever launched" the war, under the direction of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the terrorist killed last June.

"This is al-Qaeda operating in Iraq," Cheney told Limbaugh's listeners about Zarqawi, who he said had "led the charge for Iraq." Cheney cited the alleged history to illustrate his argument that withdrawing U.S. forces from Iraq would "play right into the hands of al-Qaeda."

Liars!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Thursday, April 5, 2007
DOOKIE'S A DADDY!!!!!
posted by Wally
1:04 PM

Congratulations to Dookie, Mrs. Dookie, and the little Dookette.

Pass the cigars and toss back a cold one - another little liberal has just entered the planet.

(let's give this a little bump and keep it up top)

Permalink :: 10 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Rewarding failure
posted by Clyde
10:40 AM

Ford CEO: $28M for 4 months work

Struggling Ford Motor Co., which posted a record $12.7 billion net loss in 2006, gave its new CEO Alan Mulally $28 million for four months on the job, according to a proxy statement with the SEC Thursday.

In addition, Chairman Bill Ford Jr. took only a 21 percent pay cut even though he gave up the CEO post for the last third of the year. His total compensation came in at $10.5 million, down from $13.3 million in 2005. The great-grandson of the company's founder, Ford took no base salary or bonus in either year.

Mulally, the former head of commercial aircraft for Boeing (Charts), joined Ford (Charts) at the beginning of September. His pay package at Ford included an $18.5 million bonus, as well as salary of $666,667, which works out to annual pay of about $2 million. He also received stock awards of $920,404, and stock options valued at $7.8 million.

It comes as Ford moves ahead with plans to close plants and cut more than 30,000 hourly positions from the company in an effort to stem losses. It also comes as Ford, General Motors (Charts) and DaimlerChrysler's (Charts) Chrysler Group prepare to start negotiations with the United Auto Workers union to see concessions and labor cost savings when their current contracts end in September.

Bush campaign contributor

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

New Rule: Traitors don't get to question my patriotism"
posted by Wally
10:27 AM

Bill Maher has a new rule for Bush and Cheney.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

In Their Own Words
posted by Wally
9:01 AM

On the Supplementary Iraq War Spending Bill
It has now been 57 days since I requested that Congress pass emergency funds for our troops. Instead of passing clean bills that fund our troops on the front lines, the House and Senate have spent this time debating bills that undercut the troops.

In a time of war, it's irresponsible for the Democrat leadership in ... Congress to delay for months on end while our troops in combat are waiting for the funds."
Let's set the "WayBack machine to the last Congress (the one controlled by Republicans).
February 14, 2005: Bush submits $82 billion supplemental bill
May 11, 2005: Bush signs the supplemental
Total time elapsed: 86 days

February 16, 2006: Bush submits $72 billion supplemental bill
June 15, 2006: Bush signs the supplemental
Total time elapsed: 119 days

After the 119 day delay, Bush did not say an "irresponsible" Congress had "undercut the troops" or that military families had "paid the price of failure." Instead, Bush told the conservative-led Congress, "I applaud those Members of Congress who came together in a fiscally responsible way to provide much-needed funds for the War on Terror."
ThinkProgress.org
On Military Readiness
Our men and women in uniform love their country more than their comfort. They have never failed us, and we must not fail them. But the best intentions and the highest morale are undermined by back-to-back deployments, poor pay, shortages of spare parts and equipment, and rapidly declining readiness.... these are signs of a military in decline ..... The reasons are clear. Lack of equipment and material. Undermaning of units. Overdeployment. Not enough time for family. Soldiers who are on food stamps, and soldiers who are poorly housed.
~ George W. Bush - August 21, 2000
On "micromanaging" and funding the military.
House debates measure to cut off Kosovo funding
Senate: U.S. will not pay for rebuilding Serbia

The House debated Wednesday a GOP measure to cut off future funding for U.S. military operations in the Balkans, even as Yugoslav and NATO officials finalized an agreement on the withdrawal of Serb troops from Kosovo and suspension of NATO airstrikes.
CNN

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Wednesday, April 4, 2007
I thought we didn't support terrorists?
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
12:36 PM

The Secret War Against Iran

American officials have been advising and encouraging a militant group to attack Iran. Based on how they operate - kidnapping, guerrilla raids, executions - they sure sound an awful lot like a "terrorist" group.
A Pakistani tribal militant group responsible for a series of deadly guerrilla raids inside Iran has been secretly encouraged and advised by American officials since 2005, U.S. and Pakistani intelligence sources tell ABC News.

It has taken responsibility for the deaths and kidnappings of more than a dozen Iranian soldiers and officials.

U.S. officials say the U.S. relationship with Jundullah is arranged so that the U.S. provides no funding to the group, which would require an official presidential order or "finding" as well as congressional oversight.

A senior U.S. government official said groups such as Jundullah have been helpful in tracking al Qaeda figures and that it was appropriate for the U.S. to deal with such groups in that context.
And Bush berated Pelosi for visiting Syria. Maybe the problem was that she passed along to them a message about peace negotiations from Israel. Everyone knows he has no tolerance for that "peace" thing.

Terra Terra Terra

Permalink :: 2 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Makin Bacon
posted by Clyde
10:44 AM

Unrelated Items Part of Iraq Bills Since War Began

To President Bush, they are "pork-barrel projects completely unrelated to the war," items in the House and Senate war-spending bills such as peanut storage facilities and aid to spinach farmers that insult the seriousness of the conflict and exist only to buy votes.

But such spending has been part of Iraq funding bills since the war began, sometimes inserted by the president himself, sometimes added by lawmakers with bipartisan aplomb. A few of the items may have weighed on the votes for spending bills that have now topped half a trillion dollars, but, in almost all cases over the past four years, special-interest funding provisions have been the fruits of congressional opportunism by well-placed senators or House members grabbing what they could for their constituents on the one bill that had to be passed quickly.

"Frankly, I don't see a lot of vote-buying here. And if that was what they were after in some cases, it didn't seem to work," said Scott Lilly, who was a longtime senior House Appropriations Committee aide and is now at the liberal-leaning Center for American Progress.

The president's own request last year for emergency war spending included $20 billion for Gulf Coast hurricane recovery, $2.3 billion for bird flu preparations, and $2 billion to fortify the border with Mexico and pay for his effort to send National Guardsmen to the southern frontier.

Link

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Big trouble for Gonzo
posted by Clyde
10:39 AM

House GOP skeptical of Gonzales

House Republicans don't believe that the Justice Department did anything illegal by firing eight federal prosecutors last year, but they also don't believe that Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales is telling the truth about why the attorneys were dismissed.

Several House Republicans are scoffing at Justice Department assertions that a principal reason for several of the dismissals was that the lawyers were not aggressively prosecuting immigration violations.

"It stretches anybody's credibility to suggest that this administration would have retaliated against U.S. attorneys for not enforcing immigration laws," Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, California Republican, told The Washington Times. "This administration itself is so lax in its attitude towards immigration laws and controlling the border."

Rep. Tom Tancredo, Colorado Republican, said he didn't think immigration cases had "a single thing to do with" the firings. "I really just think it was political -- filling political jobs with political appointees," said Mr. Tancredo, who is running for president mostly on his stand against illegal aliens.

Buh bye

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

The Slacker in Chief berates Dems for taking break before passing Iraq bill - then goes on vacation
posted by Wally
10:09 AM

As if he was going to stick around in Washington to sign veto it anyway? This is the guy who set the record for the most vacation days of any President in history - by the time he finished his 5th year. This is the leader of the party that was in control of the laziest Congress in history - working on average 2 1/5 days a week. He's got a lot of balls criticizing the Democrats for taking a week off - especially since after making his statement, he promptly hopped on Air Force One so that we, the taxpayers, could pay to fly him to his make-believe "ranch" in Texas (the one with no livestock - two dogs and a cat do not a "ranch" make).
In a time of war, it's irresponsible for the Democrat leadership in ... Congress to delay for months on end while our troops in combat are waiting for the funds," said Bush, counting his 57th day since delivering a war spending request to Congress.
This, coming from the guy who couldn't be bothered to shorten his month-long vacation by a couple days while Katrina was literally drowning New Orleans. From the man who couldn't be bothered to leave his ranch after hearing that "Bin Laden determined to strike in US" in August of 2001. Though, I'll give him credit, he did make the red-eye flight from Crawford to D.C. to sign that all important "Terry Schiavo" bill.
"Congress' failure to fund our troops on the front lines will mean that some of our military families could wait longer for their loved ones to return from the front lines, and others could see their loved ones headed back to the war sooner than they need to." Bush said. "That is unacceptable to me, and I believe it is unacceptable to the American people."
If it's unacceptable to you, then why won't you 1) sign the spending bill they give you - the one that not only funds the war effort, but also calls for better training and equipment for the troops, and for a way to bring them home to their families. 2) tell the military to knock off this shit with "stop-loss" and "extended tours" that make families "wait longer for their loved ones to return from the front lines", and also tell them to stop with the early deployments, sending troops back on their 2nd or 3rd stint in Iraq with only 7 or 8 months break between. That's what is making their families "see their loved ones headed back to the war sooner than they need to" - not a spending bill that gives you even more than you asked for. In a week or two, Bush will have a "reasonable" bill handed to him. If he vetoes it, the delay will be as much his fault as anyone's. Hell, it is entirely his fault that the troops are in Iraq in the first place.
"Democrats will send President Bush a bill that gives our troops the resources they need and a strategy in Iraq worthy of their sacrifices," Reid said. "If the president vetoes this bill, he will have delayed funding for troops and kept in place his strategy for failure."

Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) said, "The president says he supports our troops, yet he wants to keep them in the middle of an Iraqi civil war indefinitely."
If Bush cared about the troops, he would be vigourously negotiating with Congress to work out an acceptable deal instead of acting like a defiant 3 year old brat. Hey George, shut up and go take a "time out" - you can even call it a vacation if you want. Getting out of Washington and staying as far away as possible, for as long as possible is the best thing you can do for this country.

Hypocrite

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:35 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit a caption

Permalink :: 3 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Tuesday, April 3, 2007
Tora Tora Tora!
posted by Clyde
10:33 AM

Fury at RAF Kamikaze plan

RAF Top Guns were stunned last night after being asked to think of being Kamikaze pilots in the war on terror.

Elite fliers were shocked into silence when a senior RAF chief said they should consider suicide missions as a last resort against terrorist targets.

Air Vice Marshal David Walker put forward the attacks - like those flown by desperate Japanese pilots in World War Two - as a "worst case scenario" should they run out of ammo or their weapons failed.

He asked aircrews at a conference: "Would you think it unreasonable if I ordered you to fly your aircraft into the ground in order to destroy a vehicle carrying a Taliban or al-Qaeda commander?"

Bonzai!

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Corn shaped rafts seen sailing away from turds in the punchbowl
posted by Clyde
10:29 AM

A Defector From the Bush Inner Circle
Does Matthew Dowd's startling public criticism of the President signal that a broader rebellion is stirring among former supporters?

Most Americans probably never heard of Matthew Dowd. But his harsh criticisms of President Bush, published on Page One of the New York Times on Sunday, are rippling through the political world and causing quite a stir among bloggers of all stripes and among many Republicans in Washington.

The buzz is strong because Dowd is the first defector from Bush's political inner circle, which has always been known for its loyalty. He was Bush's chief strategist in the 2004 re-election campaign and a Bush adviser dating back to the president's years as governor of Texas. Dowd seemed to embody a central part of Bush's appeal in 2000-his track record of reaching out to the other side. Dowd said he was moved to change his party affiliation from Democrat to Republican specifically because he was so impressed with Governor Bush and his promise to be a "uniter not a divider" as president.

Row Row Row your boat

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

McCain's One Hour Iraq Fantasyland vs Daily Realities
posted by Wally
6:52 AM

In a trip to the region, surrounded by 100 U.S. soldiers, 3 Blackhawks and 2 Apache Gunships, John McCain walked around a Baghdad market on foot. Within one day, what was supposed to have been a public relations effort to regain momentum for Bush's Iraq policy turned into utter disaster.



As CNN's Michael Ware reported last night, as McCain spoke over the weekend about progress, violence erupted all over Iraq:

MICHAEL WARE: On the day his Congressional delegation made its PR visit to the Baghdad market, across the country six American troops and a British soldier were killed; 15 Iraqi soldiers died in a truck bombing in Mosul; a police officer in Diabla Province was killed by a hidden bomb; and three civilians blown apart in another market. And back in Baghdad, the same morning of the Congressional visit, Iraqi police found 17 bullet-riddled bodies on the city streets......It may be just as well Senator McCain's delegation had heavy protection. According to the Reuters news agency, the market was hit just 24 hours later with sniper fire -- a regular event, locals say.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Monday, April 2, 2007
Republican Hypocrisy So Blatant Fox News Points It Out
posted by Wally
2:05 PM

Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) flip flops on White House aid testimony so blatantly that even Faux News' Chris Wallace called him on it. In '96, McConnell was adamant that Clinton's aides should testify under oath, but now he says that Bush should decide whether it's "appropriate" for his aides should do the same. Watch Biden try not to laugh out loud at Mitch's rationalization.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Reader Rants
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
10:46 AM

Short and sweet. We like it:

To: dubyaD40.com

This is the first time I have been ashamed of a president since Nixon. This is not my president. I did not vote for him. Mark Twain said " Patriotism is always suppoting your country, but only supporting your government when they deserve it".

From: Mauro
Want to contact us with a tip or a rant? Use the "Contact Us" form on the middle right-side of this page!

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

But these guys think it's rosey...
posted by Dookie The Webmaster
8:02 AM

15 Percent Increase in Iraq Deaths Despite Surge
6 US GIs killed over weekend
McCain Continues Magical Mystery Tour


For all those journalists and politicians who keep insisting that there are new "glimmers" of "hope" in Iraq because of the new security plan started 6 weeks ago, here is a sobering statistic from the Iraqi government. (I'm looking at you, John McCain. See below for more on McCain).

Iraqis killed in February: 1806 (64.5/day)
Iraqis killed in March: 2078 (67/day)

That is a 15% increase!

(Of course, the real numbers are much higher than these government statistics suggest, since passive information gathering on casualties only catches a fraction).

While 44 Iraqi soldiers died in action, the total for US troops in March was 85. AFP is suspicious about the disparity given that US and Iraqi authorities have said that Iraqi troops are leading the security crackdown. If that were true, they should have more casualties than the Americans.

(snip)

This grandstanding trip that John McCain took to Baghdad on Sunday is another occasion for propaganda to shore up his falling poll numbers in his presidential campaign. He said, "Things are better and there are encouraging signs. I've been here . . . many times over the years. Never have I been able to drive from the airport, never have I been able go out into the city as I was today."

He said that only three days after the US embassy issued an order that personnel are to wear 'personal protective equipment' when moving between buildings inside the Green Zone! He said it the day two suicide belt bombs were found inside the Green Zone. So he could ride in an armored car in from the airport. That's the big achievement? What about when he gets to the Green Zone? Then he has to put on PPE to go to the cafeteria.

Juan Cole

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

McCain still delusional about Iraq - Update
posted by Wally
6:57 AM

Senator John McCain showed further evidence that he is the perfect man to represent the Republican party in the 2008 presidential race by continuing to deny reality, even when faced directly with it.


After a heavily guarded trip to a Baghdad market, Sen. John McCain insisted Sunday that a U.S.-Iraqi security crackdown in the capital was working and said Americans lacked a "full picture" of the progress. The U.S. military later reported six soldiers were killed in roadside bombings southwest of Baghdad.

[Newsweek reported that "it didn't take the insurgents long to send their reply. Less then 30 minutes after McCain wrapped up, a barrage of half a dozen mortars peppered the boundaries of the Green Zone, where the senators held their press conference."]
So wait a minute John - you spend one hour, surrounded by troops and security forces, in an area just swept clean by the "crackdown", and you tell us that we're not getting the "full picture"? We've spend nearly half a trillion dollars and are losing a couple troops a day, and you claim it's a success because there are a few small patches where you can spend one hour, travelling in armored vehicles under heavy guard without getting shot at or blown up? That's a hell of a "full picture" you're looking at there Senator. Coming to the Senator's defense was Brig. Gen. Qassim al-Moussawi.

"The fact that the violence decreased in Baghdad, the terrorists went to the surrounding areas and these areas are breeding grounds for violence," he said. "The terrorist elements are backed into a corner and we are going to continue to carry out these operations."
Apparently, everything that is not Baghdad is now considered "a corner" by the General. Perhaps he needs a lesson in geometry.

The "full picture" that I see, Senator McCain, is that we're playing a very high dollar, very high risk game of "Whack-a-mole" - chasing the resistance from one place to another. Senator, I invite you to spend a few weeks travelling across Iraq on your own, in an unarmored, unguarded car. Spend it like a tourist, exploring the beautiful countryside, taking in the scenery, visiting the historical sites, dining in the fine restaurants and staying at the posh hotels. Then come back and tell us about the "full picture". Please. I'm sure you'll enjoy your stay. And the inevitable results will benefit all of us.

Great Progress

UPDATE: Here's a picture of the brave, strong, fearless Senator "walking free" during his trip to Iraq




The story points out that accompanying McCain were: "100 American soldiers, with three Blackhawk helicopters, and two Apache gunships overhead." And that's either a fishing vest or body armour he's wearing.

Nonetheless, McCain told reporters: "that his visit to the market today was proof that you could indeed 'walk freely' in some areas of Baghdad."
Next week we expect to see John McCain walking freely through the National Zoo in D.C., telling us how harmless lions and grizzlies are.

Walk Free

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Calling Bush's bluff - Dems promise to push for withdrawal
posted by Wally
6:29 AM

With Bush threatening to veto (only his third ever) the Iraq War supplemental spending bill offered by the Democratic led Congress, the Dems look like they're going to call his bluff - practically "daring" the self-proclaimed "War-President" to veto a "war spending" bill. Why doesn't the President want to support the troops?
Senate Democratic leaders said Sunday they will keep pushing for a withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq even if President Bush vetoes legislation calling for a pullout.

Meanwhile, the Senate's top Republican leader dismissed as unacceptable any legislation that sets deadlines for a troop withdrawal. He called on Democrats to cut short their Easter recess so lawmakers can quickly send a final version to Bush for a veto.
It's funny to hear cries of "get back to work" from the leadership of the party that brought you record vacation days for Congress - that worked on average nearly 2 1/2 days a week for the past 6 years - that whined about how working full week was "bad for families" when Nancy Pelosi first introduced the idea just a few months ago. Not to be outdone in the Republican hypocricy department, we have this from White House Counselor Dan Bartlett.
What we haven't seen from this Democratic leadership is a willingness to drop this very restrictive language...
Which is funny coming from a White House that imposed some "very restrictive language" of its own, promising to
"veto any funding legislation with timelines"
Let's hope the Dems do the right thing. Dare Bush to veto a bill supporting the military. Prove that he cares more for his war than the troops. The reintroduce the same damn bill, only rename it. Instead of the "Iraq War" spending bill, call it what it really is, the "Iraq Occupation" spending bill. Reframe the issue and put the Republicans on the spot to see who votes for it, and who votes against it in that context.

Support the Occupation?

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

Caption This
posted by Wally
6:18 AM

Use the "Post a Comment" link to submit your caption.

Permalink :: 4 comments :: Post a Comment
 

 

 

 Headlines & Comments

 
 True! by Daryl Cagle

See more TRUE cartoons by Daryl Cagle
 

Kansas City's own...
dubyaD40.com

Site Meter