Home

Columnists

Merchandise

Other Stuff

 

 Air America Radio

 Head-On Radio Network

 Search dubyaD40.com

Google


Search Web
Search dubyaD40.com

 Ads by The Google

 Take Action

 Recent Posts

 Archives

 Today's Reason To Drink



 Want to link to us?


It's easy to do.  Right click on the image below and choose "Copy."  Then paste it on your site.


 

 

 Blogroll

 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 Today's Topics

 
Saturday, March 15, 2008
Call your House Rep and Thank Them
posted by Wally
7:48 AM

(or chastise them, depending on how they voted) for upholding the Constitution and finally defying the Boy King
House Rejects Eavesdropping Immunity

After its first secret session in a quarter-century, the House on Friday rejected retroactive immunity for the phone companies that took part in the National Security Agency's warrantless eavesdropping program after the Sept. 11 attacks, and it voted to place greater restrictions on the government's wiretapping powers.

The decision, by a largely party-line vote of 213 to 197, is one of the few times when Democrats have been willing to buck up against the White House on a national security issue. It also ensures that the months-long battle over the government's wiretapping powers will drag on for at least a few more weeks and possibly much longer.

With President Bu sh and Democratic leaders squaring off almost daily on the wiretapping question, neither side has shown much inclination to budge. The question now moves to the Senate, where lawmakers passed a bill last month that was much more to the liking of the White House. Unlike the bill approved Friday by the House, it would give legal immunity to the phone providers that helped in the National Security Agency's wiretapping program, which President Bush says is essential to protect national security.

The House bill approved Friday includes three key elements: it would refuse retroactive immunity to the phone companies, providing special authority instead for the courts to decide the liability issue; it would add additional judicial restrictions on the government's wiretapping powers while plugging certain loopholes in foreign coverage; and it would create a Congressional commission to investigate the N.S.A. program.
Also call your Senator and tell him/her to support the House's version of the bill, with no immunity for violating the Constitution and breaking the law. While the bill won't hold up to a veto, forcing Bush to veto it will mean that HE is the one who is not "protecting national security" by killing a bill passed by both houses of Congress. It will also slow the approval of wiretapping by another several months while a new bill is written. Keep handing him bills he doesn't like and make him veto them until January 2009, when we'll (hopefully) have a sane person in the White House.

Thank you House of Reps

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

 
   
 

 

 

 

 Headlines & Comments

 
 True! by Daryl Cagle

See more TRUE cartoons by Daryl Cagle
 

Kansas City's own...
dubyaD40.com

Site Meter