Home

Columnists

Merchandise

Other Stuff

 

 Air America Radio

 Head-On Radio Network

 Search dubyaD40.com

Google


Search Web
Search dubyaD40.com

 Ads by The Google

 Take Action

 Recent Posts

 Archives

 Today's Reason To Drink



 Want to link to us?


It's easy to do.  Right click on the image below and choose "Copy."  Then paste it on your site.


 

 

 Blogroll

 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 Today's Topics

 
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Today Is Gonzo's Big Day
posted by Wally
6:29 AM

After weeks of stonewalling, tapdancing, trying to weasel out of it, and finally "rehearsing" for the occasion, Alberto Gonzales will face the Senate Judiciary Committee this morning. More importantly, he'll be under oath.
The Senate Judiciary Committee scheduled a daylong hearing for Gonzales' first appearance under oath since the firings set off an uproar in February that has only escalated with a bewildering series of conflicting accounts from the attorney general, his current and former aides and White House officials.

Gonzales himself has provided differing versions of the events, first saying he had almost no involvement in them and then later acknowledging that his role was larger, but only after e-mails about meetings he attended were released by the Justice Department to House and Senate committees.
It appears that neither the Democrats nor Republicans on the committee will be lobbing him softball questions or letting him weasel out of answering.
Some Republicans acknowledge that merely sticking to the talking points in Gonzales' prepared testimony will make it hard for him to hang onto his job. The committee's senior Republican, Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, dismissed the prepared remarks as "pablum."

Pablum
It's hard to argue with Senator Specter on that. Among the things he said in his prepared statement, which was released on Sunday:
"he admitted the ousters were mishandled and that he had been 'less than precise with my words' when he first discussed them."
"Less than precise with my words"? Could there be a less precise statement than that? Did he lie? Was he wrong? Did he intentionally obfuscate the situation? Was he just babbling because he didn't have the vaguest idea what the hell he was talking about and was trying to hide his incompetence? Precisely what the hell does "less than precise with my words" mean? Pablum indeed.

The hearings are set to begin at 9:30 ET today, and will be broadcast live on C-Span. It should be fun to watch.

Permalink :: 0 comments :: Post a Comment
 

 
   
 

 

 

 

 Headlines & Comments

 
 True! by Daryl Cagle

See more TRUE cartoons by Daryl Cagle
 

Kansas City's own...
dubyaD40.com

Site Meter