Home

Columnists

Merchandise

Other Stuff

 

 Air America Radio

 Head-On Radio Network

 Search dubyaD40.com

Google


Search Web
Search dubyaD40.com

 Ads by The Google

 Take Action

 Recent Posts

 Archives

 Today's Reason To Drink



 Want to link to us?


It's easy to do.  Right click on the image below and choose "Copy."  Then paste it on your site.


 

 

 Blogroll

 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 Today's Topics

 
Friday, March 2, 2007
Why Do The Republicans Hate The Troops?
posted by Wally
11:45 AM

Yesterday House minority leader Boehner (R-OH) threatened to get Republicans to vote against a $96.3 billion spending bill for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Boehner's comments came while Democrats were still trying to hammer out details of the huge spending package. Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., the anti-war chairman of the military appropriations subcommittee who is a close Pelosi ally, wants to attach requirements that no units could be sent back to Iraq until they are fully trained, equipped and rested.

Boehner said the conditions Murtha wants are unacceptable. "We will not support a bill that inhibits the president's ability to wage this war," he told reporters. Boehner added that if the committee bill includes such conditions, he will direct top House Republicans to press their members to vote against it.
SF Gate
"Unacceptable?" The GOP leadership thinks it's "unacceptable" to send our troops into war fully trained, equipped, and rested? Even worse, after making this threat yesterday, Boehner came out today with this beauty:
"Once again, Democrats are demonstrating their inherent reluctance - if not their outright opposition - to delivering unconditional support for American troops fighting in harm's way to ensure victory in the war on terror. Whether this is the result of a preoccupation with partisan politics in Washington or a callous disregard for the unspeakable consequences of failure, it has led to numerous backdoor attempts to hamstring our military commanders' ability to win the war and undermine our troops' mission. This is dangerous, this is irresponsible, and this is reckless."

"Our enemies in the war on terror have announced their strategy publicly: they will avoid toe-to-toe confrontations with our superior military and engage in cowardly terrorist strikes; they will wait us out to increase our costs; and they will do everything they can to destroy America's support for the troops. Establishing - and telegraphing to our enemy - arbitrary timelines for withdrawal will not help us. It will help the enemy. Micro-managing American troop movements against an enemy who hides, waits, and strives more for death rather than life, will not help us. It will help them. And cutting or hamstringing funding for our troops to force a slow-bleed withdrawal is tantamount to handing the enemy victory itself."

"Republicans will continue to stand united behind our troops for victory in the global war on terror. We will not jeopardize the safety and security of American families, or that of those to come in future generations, by giving our troops anything less than our full and unfettered support."
From Boner's own website
That quote was not taken out of context - it is the full quote from his own website. And just yesterday he threatened to cut funding because it included provisions to train and equip the troops. Help me out here - how is cutting funding and not providing adequate training and equipment "giving our troops full and unfettered support"?

How many years have they been accusing the Dems of being weak on defense and not supporting the military. How many times has the GOP railed on the Democrats for playing politics with the lives of our men and women in uniform? The hypocracy of the Republican leadership knows no bounds.

By the way, if you want to read all about Boehner's long and illustrious military service to this country, you can find it in his biography. If you don't have time to hunt for it, I'll save you time. He never served.

Permalink :: 1 comments :: Post a Comment
 

 
 
   
 
This is NOT A WAR! It's an occupation. And the same tactics he belittles the Iraqis using to get us out of their country worked fine for our own Continental Army. And since we're losing (as we must, for we can't 'win' an occupation, an illeagle one at that.) And these guys are 'cowardly'? They seem pretty ballsy, regularly cleaning our multibillion dollar clocks with jury rigged weapons, lots of them made with the explosives we left unguarded all over the country. Both sides in this "debate", if you can call it that, are cowardly, ignorant (since most of them know absolutely nothing about the military) fools, concerned not with either the troops or the country, just flailing egos trying to come out on top of an insane argument. We've already lost! 'victory' is a bullshit dream that can not happen. Stay tuned. Next on the 'victory plan'? Look for Israeli Jets with Iranian markings attacking one of our sitting duck Carrier Battle Groups. Can you say "Gulf of Tonkin"? And it'll have bipartisan support. I can just hear Hillary now...We're all Israelis! (the bitch has actually already said that) We are already through the looking glass folks, better go out and buy a magnetic yellow ribbon, you know, really sacrifice!

posted by Anonymous Pissed purple at 3:27 AM  

   
 

 

 

 

 Headlines & Comments

 
 True! by Daryl Cagle

See more TRUE cartoons by Daryl Cagle
 

Kansas City's own...
dubyaD40.com

Site Meter